|
|
|
|


*
U. S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service, Childrens Nutrition Research Center, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030;
Division of Physiology, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark, NJ 07103; and Departments of
**
Animal Sciences and
Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801
3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dburrin{at}bcm.tmc.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: protein degradation cell proliferation growth factor protein synthesis disaccharidase pigs
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the developing neonatal intestine, several factors have been shown
to affect the expression and activity of LPH, including diet
(5
,8
9
10)
, the proximal-distal location
(11
,12)
and stage of enterocyte differentiation along the
crypt-villus axis (13)
. At the cellular level, the
production of LPH is subject to multiple sites of regulation at the
transcriptional, translational and posttranslational levels. In pigs,
at least two isoforms of prolactase-phlorizin hydrolase (pro-LPH),
one mannosylated and the other bearing complex glycosidic side chains,
have been isolated from the small intestinal mucosa. Furthermore, the
complex glycosylated precursor form is cleaved proteolytically before
insertion into the brush-border (BB) membrane as BB-LPH. Thus,
in vivo, a long time can elapse between translation of pro-LPH and
final insertion, and a number of studies (9
,14)
have indicated that <100% of pro-LPH eventually appears in the BB
membrane. Our studies in newborn pigs have shown that feeding colostrum
stimulates the synthesis of pro-LPH, but its posttranslational
processing to BB-LPH form is disrupted (8
,9)
. This
observation prompted us to examine the factors in colostrum that may
increase the synthesis and activity of lactase in the neonate.
Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) is abundant in colostrum
(15)
, and a number of recent studies with neonatal pigs
and rodents have demonstrated that orally administered IGF-I
stimulates intestinal growth (16
17
18)
, lactase activity
(19
20
21
22)
and glucose transport activity (23)
.
In contrast, some studies with neonatal rodents have shown very limited
effects of oral IGF-I on either intestinal growth or lactase
activity (24
,25)
. In neonatal pigs, the effect of oral
IGF-I on intestinal growth and lactase activity is
dose-dependent, in that intestinal growth seems to be stimulated
only at pharmacological doses (16)
, whereas lactase
activity responds to a physiological dose of the peptide
(19)
. A subsequent study demonstrated that the increased
lactase activity was associated with increased abundance of pro-LPH
and LPH mRNA, implying that oral IGF-I increases lactase gene
expression (24)
. However, the effects of IGF-I on
pro-LPH synthesis and posttranslational processing have not been
measured. Therefore, the main objective of the current study was to
quantify the effects of IGF-I supplemented in formula at two doses
on pro-LPH synthesis and the efficiency of its transfer to the BB
membrane. We measured the synthesis rate of pro-LPH and the
proportion transferred to BB-LPH in neonatal pigs, using a recently
developed multiple stable isotopic approach (15)
that
allows detailed kinetic analysis in a single tissue sample. In
addition, we assessed whether the potential effects of oral IGF-I
on LPH synthesis and activity were associated with changes in cell
proliferation rate and villus morphometry.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Pregnant sows were purchased from the Texas Department of Criminal
Justice (Huntsville, TX). The sows were fed a commercial nonpurified
diet (Purina Mills, St. Louis, MO). Pregnant sows were housed in the
Childrens Nutrition Research Center (Houston, TX) at 24°C in
free-standing farrowing crates; they consumed food and water ad
libitum. Pigs were delivered vaginally between 113 and 114 d of
gestation and allowed to suckle the dam naturally to obtain colostrum
for 2436 h. They were then weaned completely from their dams and
randomly assigned to receive either a cows milk formula (Litterlife;
Merrick, Uniondale, WI; control group) or formula supplemented with a
low (0.5 mg IGF-I/L; low IGF) or high (12.0 mg IGF-I/L; high IGF) dose
of human recombinant IGF-I (Genentech, San Francisco, CA) for
14 d. Pigs were housed individually in stainless steel cages in a
room maintained at 2930°C and fed 300350 mL of formula per kg
body daily, using an artificial feeding device similar to that
described previously (19)
. Briefly, a fluid reservoir was
connected with tubing to an infant bottle nipple that was attached to
the side of the cage. The piglet obtained liquid formula by sucking on
the nipple. The reservoir was filled four times daily to ensure that
formula was constantly available. The formula was prepared daily and
mixed with water at the ratio of 120150 g powder/L. The dry matter
content of the formula was gradually increased in the first 7 d of
feeding to minimize diarrhea. The nutrient content of the formula
ranged from 30 to 37.5 g protein/L and from 500 to 630 kcal
(2.092.63 MJ) gross energy/L. After 9 d of dietary treatment,
all pigs were deprived of food overnight. The following morning, a
polyvinyl chloride catheter (1.78 mm o.d.) was surgically implanted in
the carotid artery and external jugular vein of the pigs under general
anesthesia. The pigs were ambulatory within 46 h and resumed their
presurgical rates of formula intake within 24 h after surgery. A
total of 17 pigs from three litters was studied, and within each litter
all three treatment groups were replicated (control, n
= 5; low IGF, n = 6; high IGF,
n = 6). The protocol was approved by the Animal
Care and Use Committee of Baylor College of Medicine and was conducted
in accordance with the National Research Councils Guide for
the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Stable isotope infusion protocol.
After 14 d of treatment, pigs were given a multiple overlapping
infusion of stable isotopes similar to that described previously
(15)
. Pigs were infused intravenously with a total of six
stable amino acid isotopomers, and the total infusion time was 360 min.
All isotopes were the L-form of the amino acid and were
purchased from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Andover, MA). Two stable
isotopomers of leucine were infused at the following rates:
[5,5,5-2H]-leucine (2H3-Leu) at
30 µmol · kg-1 · h-1 for 360 min;
[1-13C]-leucine (13C1-Leu) at 30
µmol · kg-1 · h-1 for 240 min. Four
stable isotopomers of phenylalanine were infused at the following
rates: [1-13C]-phenylalanine
(13C1-Phe) at 20 µmol · kg-1
· h-1 for 180 min; [ring
D5-2H]-phenylalanine
(2H5-Phe) at 20 µmol · kg-1
· h-1 for 90 min; [ring
-13C6]-phenylalanine
(13C6-Phe) at 20 µmol · kg-1
· h-1 for 60 min; U-[13C]-phenylalanine
(U-13C9-Phe) at 30 µmol · kg-1
· h-1 for 30 min. During the infusion protocol, pigs
were fed by gavage half of the total daily intake (150 mL/kg) of their
respective dietary treatments as follows: 75 mL/kg at time 0 and 37.5
mL/kg at 120 min and 240 min into the infusion. Arterial blood samples
were collected for baseline tracer enrichments and at the end of the
360-min infusion period. Blood was centrifuged at 2000 x g for 10 min at 4°C and the plasma was removed and
frozen at -70°C. To measure crypt cell proliferation,
5-bromo-deoxyuridine (BrdU) was injected (50 mg/kg body) via the
arterial catheter at 120 min before killing the pigs. Pigs were killed
at the end of the infusion with an overdose of sodium pentobarbital
(200 mg/kg), and tissues were collected as described previously
(16)
. Briefly, the small intestine was removed, flushed
with ice-cold saline and divided into two equal segments; the
proximal and distal halves were designated as jejunum and ileum,
respectively. Sections from the proximal region of each segment were
fixed in a buffered formalin solution for histology, and additional
tissue was frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept at -70°C.
Analyses of plasma and tissue.
The IGF-I concentration in plasma samples was determined using a
two-site immunoradiometric assay (IRMA; Diagnostic Systems,
Webster, TX). The IGF-I IRMA assay involves an acid-ethanol
extraction of the sample and recognizes both the human and porcine
IGF-I peptides, which have an identical amino acid sequence.
Aliquots of the control formula and the IGF-I-supplemented formulas
were centrifuged at 20,000 x g for 15 min at
4°C, and the IGF-I concentration in the supernatant was measured
using the IGF-I IRMA. All samples of plasma and formula were
analyzed in one assay with a CV of 6.5%. The immunoisolation,
purification and quantification of LPH polypeptides have been described
previously (9
,27)
. BB membranes were prepared by magnesium
chloride precipitation as described previously (28)
.
Lactase activity in the intestinal tissue homogenate and BB membranes
was measured as described previously (27)
. All intestinal
tissue homogenization buffers contained protease inhibitors (348 g/L
PMSF, 25 mg/L leupeptin, 25 mg/L aprotinin; Sigma Aldrich Chemical, St.
Louis, MO). The intestinal tissue protein and DNA assays, villus
morphometry measurement and immunohistochemical assay of
BrdU-positive crypt cells have also been described previously
(29)
. Crypt cell proliferation was expressed as the number
of BrdU-positive stained enterocytes expressed as a percentage of
the total cells in the crypt.
The preparation of plasma, mucosal-free and mucosal
protein-bound amino acid fractions and LPH polypeptides for
GC-MS analysis has been described previously (15
,27)
.
Mass spectrometry was conducted with the n-propyl ester
heptafluorobutyramide derivative using methane negative chemical
ionization as previously described (15)
. The analyses were
performed with a 5890 series II gas chromatograph linked to a model
5989B (Hewlett-Packard, Palo Alto, CA) quadrupole mass spectrometer.
The isotope ratios were calculated using the abundance of ions at a
mass-to-charge ratio of 349, 350 and 352 for leucine isotopomers and
383, 384, 388, 389 and 392 for the isotopomers of phenylalanine. The
data on the ion abundances of each amino acid isotopomer were converted
to tracer-to-tracee ratio expressed as mole percent (mol%) by the
matrix method.
Calculations.
The details of the isotopic approach and calculations are discussed
extensively by Dudley et al. (15)
. Briefly, the principle
of the method is that by substituting the relative isotopic enrichments
of multiple tracer forms of the same amino acid that have been infused
for different periods of time, the kinetics of equilibration and
incorporation into both the free and protein-bound amino acid pools
can be discerned. In other words, the method substitutes multiple
tracers for multiple time points. In the present study, we used a
simplified approach to the calculation, the modeling being carried out
with the numerical routine of SAAM II (SAAM Institute, University of
Washington, Seattle, WA). The fit involved weighting, using the pooled
standard deviation of the respective isotopic enrichments at each time
point.
In the initial analysis, the tracer enrichments of the three
phenylalanine and two leucine tracers were normalized to a standard
infusion rate of 20 µmol · kg-1 · h-1
and combined by multiplying the tracer enrichments of the phenylalanine
isotopomers by the ratio of the measured plasma phenylalanine:leucine
flux, which was 0.37. Values of the isotopic enrichments of the plasma
and mucosal free amino acid pools in individual animals were then
fitted to the equation:
![]() | (1) |
in which P is the predicted isotopic enrichment at steady state,
t the time of isotope administration (min) and k the rate constant of
equilibration. The values for the plateau labeling and the rate
constants shown in the tables are means ± SD
calculated from the data for each animal, rather than those calculated
from pooled labeling data. The kinetics of pro-LPH synthesis then
were calculated by fitting the ratio of the isotopic enrichments of
pro-LPH: free amino acid to the equation:
![]() | (2) |
in which y is the ratio of the isotopic enrichments of the precursor and product, t is time (min), R the predicted steady-state ratio and b a time delay (min). Because there was a long (>100-min) delay in the appearance of tracer in BB-LPH, the precursor isotopic enrichment used in the calculation of the BB-LPH fractional synthesis rate was that of pro-LPH predicted by Eq. 2 at time tthe predicted delay in the appearance of tracer in BB-LPH. Once again, the data from each animal were analyzed separately. Thereafter, the fractional synthesis rate of BB-LPH was calculated from the slope of the line of the ratio of the isotopic enrichment of BB-LPH to that of pro-LPH.
The absolute rates of synthesis of pro- and BB-LPH were calculated
from the product of their respective pool sizes and their respective
rate constants of synthesis. The pool size of each protein was
calculated as the product of the lactase activity and the fractional
contribution of pro-LPH and BB-LPH to the total lactase
activity (10)
. This is because purified standards for
pro-LPH and BB-LPH are not available and, thus, direct
measurements of their protein content from the SDS-PAGE are not
possible. In effect, the results of mass and synthesis are expressed in
arbitrary units and represent the amount of the isoform per gram of
tissue protein and rate of synthesis per day. Thus, the ratio of the
absolute rates of synthesis of BB-LPH to that of pro-LPH
measures the efficiency with which newly synthesized pro-LPH is
converted to the BB form of the enzyme.
Statistical analysis.
Data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA with treatment (control, low IGF, high IGF) and site of intestine (jejunum vs. ileum) as main effects. Results are expressed as means ± pooled SD unless otherwise indicated. Differences with probability values of <0.05 were considered significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Formula and plasma IGF-I concentrations.
The cows milk formula contained a small amount of immunoreactive IGF-I (3.38 ± 0.22 nmol/L) compared with that in the low IGF (113 ± 8 nmol/L) and high IGF (1795 ± 84 nmol/L) formulas. This resulted in significantly (P < 0.01) different calculated mean daily IGF-I intakes (nmol/kg) in the control (1.13 ± 0.01), low IGF (38.0 ± 0.4) and high IGF (614 ± 18) groups. Despite the marked differences in IGF-I intake, the plasma IGF-I concentrations (nmol/L) measured after 14 d did not differ among the control (18.7 ± 4.1), low IGF (16.4 ± 6.0) and high IGF (14.6 ± 2.9) groups.
Intestinal mass and morphometry.
The masses of wet tissue, protein and DNA were significantly higher in
the ileum than in the jejunum (Table 1
). In addition, when pooled across treatments, the ratio of protein to
DNA was
40% greater (P < 0.01) in the ileum (30.5
± 6.0) than in the jejunum (21.9 ± 2.4). The villus height
and cell proliferation index were higher, whereas the crypt depth was
lower in the ileum than in the jejunum (Table 2
). There were no significant differences among the three treatment
groups in the masses of the small intestinal wet tissue, protein or DNA
(Table 1)
or in intestinal morphometric or cell proliferation indices
of mucosal growth (Table 2)
.
|
|
Administration of IGF-I did not affect any of the indices of LPH
activity (Table 3
). However, when averaged across IGF-I treatments, the total lactase
activity per segment (698 ± 262 vs. 308 ± 122) and specific
enzyme activity (215 ± 71 vs. 145 ± 45) were significantly
(P < 0.005) higher in the ileum than in the jejunum.
However, when the measurements were confined to the LPH in isolated BB
membranes, activity was lower in the ileum than in the jejunum (Table 3)
.
|
There were no differences among the treatment groups in either the
plateau enrichments or the amino acid turnover rates in the plasma
(Fig. 1
). As expected, there was substantial dilution of the tracer amino acid
in the mucosal free amino acid pool compared with plasma (Fig. 2
). There was no segmental difference in the rate of equilibration, yet
the steady-state dilution of the tracer was significantly greater
in the ileum than in the jejunum. In both segments, the plateau amino
acid isotopic enrichment and the ratio of the tissue to plasma amino
acid labeling at plateau were significantly higher in the high IGF
group than in the controls and showed a quasilinear dose relationship
(Table 4
).
|
|
|
In all three treatment groups, the relative enrichments of pro-LPH
came to plateau values rapidly between 90 and 180 min of tracer
infusion (data not shown). In the controls, the isotopic enrichment at
steady state in pro-LPH was significantly higher than that of the
free amino acid (i.e., the ratio of tissue to plasma was >1.0;
Table 5
). Treatment with IGF-I, mainly high IGF, was associated with a fall
in the ratio of the plateau isotopic enrichments of the pro-LPH-bound
and tissue-free amino acids. In both segments, the fractional
synthesis rate of pro-LPH was lower in both the low and high
IGF-treated groups than in the control group.
|
There were no significant effects of either IGF-I treatment or site
of intestine on the fractional synthesis rate of total mucosal protein
(Table 6
). The fractional synthesis rate of BB-LPH was significantly
(P < 0.01) higher in the jejunum (91 to 97% per d)
than in the ileum (2251%/d). Although IGF-I administration did
not alter the fractional synthesis rate of BB-LPH in the jejunum,
both low and high IGF-I treatments were associated with a more than
100% increase in BB-LPH synthesis in the ileum.
|
Based on scanning densitometric analysis, the relative abundances of
pro-LPH in both segments were lower, and those of BB-LPH were
higher in IGF-treated pigs than in controls (data not shown). The
absolute synthesis rates of pro-LPH did not differ between
segments, but were significantly lower in both the low and high
IGF-treated pigs than in controls (Table 7
). In control pigs, the absolute synthesis rate of BB-LPH in the
ileum was significantly lower than in the jejunum and as a result, the
efficiency of processing of newly synthesized pro-LPH to the BB was
lower in the more distal region of the small intestine. The high
IGF-I treatment increased the processing efficiency from 14% to
40% in the jejunum and from 4% to 19% in the ileum.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast to previous findings of Houle et al. and others
(19
,26)
, we found no significant effect of oral IGF-I
on LPH activity, whether expressed as total activity per region, as
specific activity per unit of mucosal protein or as per unit of BB
protein. In addition, oral IGF-I had no effect on any measures of
intestinal tissue mass, crypt cell proliferation or villus height, a
finding that contrasts with some studies in neonatal pigs
(16
,19
,26)
but confirms other reports in both neonatal
pigs and rodents (23
24
25)
.
The explanation for the discrepancy between our findings and those of
Houle et al. (19
,26)
is not clear. The low dose of
IGF-I in the present study was similar to the high dose used by
Houle et al. (19)
, and the ages and period of treatment
were similar. However, there were some potentially important
differences in the respective experimental protocols. First, we used
vaginally born pigs that had suckled on the dams for 2436 h before
entering the study whereas Houle et al. (19
,26)
used
cesarean-derived, colostrum-deprived pigs. Another, perhaps
critical difference between the two studies was that in the present
study the intestinal tissue used to assess lactase expression and
synthesis was obtained in fed pigs, whereas Houle et al.
(19
,26)
studied pigs after overnight food deprivation. In
the present study, we reasoned that is was most logical to test the
effect of oral IGF-I on lactase processing in the fed rather than
the overnight food-deprived state, because that is when both the
growth factor and the substrate (i.e., lactose) are presented to the
mucosal epithelium. Given the present findings, if indeed lactase
activity is only up-regulated by oral IGF-I in the
food-deprived state, then the response to oral IGF-I is of
limited relevance to the functional capacity to digest lactose.
Despite the lack of an effect on intestinal protein mass or LPH
activity, oral IGF-I had a number of effects on LPH synthesis and
processing. First, chronic administration of oral IGF-I suppressed
the fractional and absolute synthesis rates of pro-LPH and lowered
the relative contribution of the pro-peptide to total
immunoprecipitable LPH. At the same time, IGF-I treatment increased
the rate of mature BB-LPH synthesis, particularly in the ileum.
Because the rate of pro-LPH synthesis was not increased by
IGF-I, the increase in BB-LPH synthesis reflected a substantial
increase in the proportion of newly synthesized pro-LPH that was
processed and inserted in the BB membrane. The net effect of these two
opposing kinetic responses was no change in the calculated mass of
BB-LPH, a conclusion that is consistent with the LPH-specific
activity measurements. The mechanism for decreased pro-LPH
synthesis is unknown and contrary to the previous finding that oral
IGF-I increased mRNA abundance (26)
. In the jejunum,
there was a IGF-I dose-dependent increase in the mucosal free pool
tracer enrichment. In addition, the mucosal free pool tracer enrichment
was much higher in the jejunum than in the ileum. Given that there were
no differences in the circulating arterial plasma tracer enrichment,
there are three possible explanations for these differences in the
mucosal free pool tracer enrichment: 1) IGF-I increased
the rate of basolateral transport of tracer amino acid from the
arterial circulation into the cell, 2) IGF-I increased
the rate of apical transport of unlabeled tracee amino acid from the
intestinal lumen into the cell, or 3) IGF-I suppressed
the rate of intracellular proteolysis and release of unlabeled tracee
amino acid. Based on evidence that IGF-I has been shown to increase
amino acid transport (31)
, it is conceivable that the
increased mucosal tracer enrichments resulted from increased
basolateral transport from the circulation. However, if IGF-I were
to increase the apical transport of amino acid from the lumen into the
epithelial cells, then this would dilute or decrease the tracer
enrichment. However, we found it to be increased by IGF-I, making
this second possibility seem unlikely. The third, and in our opinion
most likely, possibility is that IGF-I suppressed proteolysis and
the intracellular release of unlabeled amino acid, which led to the
increased mucosal tracer enrichments. The same holds true for the
regional differences along the intestine, suggesting higher rates of
proteolysis in the ileum than in the jejunum. In support of this
interpretation, the processing efficiency of pro-LPH to BB-LPH
was consistently and positively correlated with the mucosal free tracer
enrichments with respect to both IGF-I and regional site
differences. Thus, we postulate that the increased processing
efficiency to BB-LPH is a likely consequence of suppressed
intracellular proteolysis.
Although the focus of this study was IGF-I, perhaps the most
remarkable observations were the differences in the kinetics of LPH
synthesis and processing between the jejunum and ileum. The first
observation of note was that the total segment and tissue-specific
activity of lactase in all treatment groups was between 50% and 100%
higher in the ileum than in the jejunum. The differences between
segments in both of these measures of lactase activity were associated
with substantially longer villi. A longer villus implies a longer
enterocyte lifespan, and, hence, a greater number of differentiated
enterocytes expressing lactase activity. Interestingly, however, the
lactase activity measured in the BB fraction was significantly lower in
the ileum than in the jejunum. Consistent with BB activity
measurements, we found that the absolute and fractional synthesis rates
of BB-LPH were also significantly slower in the ileum than in the
jejunum. Thus, it seems that although there is a much greater mass of
lactase activity in the ileum, the activity of lactase per villus
enterocyte is much lower than in the jejunum, reflecting a much lower
efficiency of processing of pro-LPH to BB-LPH form. Of
additional interest is the fact that our estimates of the efficiency of
LPH processing are consistent with the reports implicating
posttranslational control in the general decline in the activity of
LPH, despite elevated expression of LPH mRNA, along the
proximal-to-distal axis of the intestine (11
,12)
.
In summary, the current results demonstrate that chronic oral IGF-I supplementation significantly decreases the synthesis of pro-LPH but increases the efficiency of its posttranslational processing to BB-LPH, resulting in increased BB-LPH synthesis in the ileum. Despite this, however, all measurements of intestinal lactase activity were unaffected by oral IGF-I treatment. Our current findings confirm several previous reports, which together strongly suggest that oral IGF-I supplementation does not affect any aspect of intestinal growth or morphology in healthy well-nourished neonates.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Supported by the U. S. Department of Agriculture Agricultural Research Service under Cooperative Agreement 58-6250-6001. ![]()
4 Present address: Ming Z. Fan, Department of Animal and Poultry Science, Room 250, Animal Science/Nutrition Building, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1. ![]()
5 Abbreviations used: BB-LPH, brush-border lactase-phlorizin hydrolase; IGF-I, insulin-like growth factor I; IRMA, immunoradiometric assay; LPH, lactase-phlorizin hydrolase; pro-LPH, prolactase-phlorizin hydrolase. ![]()
Manuscript received March 2, 2001. Initial review completed April 13, 2001. Revision accepted May 30, 2001.
| LITERATURE CITED |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Sangild P. T., Fowden A. L. & Trahair J. F. (2000) How does the foetal gastrointestinal tract develop in preparation for enteral nutrition after birth?. Livestock. Prod. Sci. 66:141-150.
2.
Buller H. A., Kothe M. J., Goldman D. A., Grubman S. A., Sasak W. V., Matsudaira P. T., Montgomery R. K. & Grand R. J. (1990) Coordinate expression of lactase-phlorizin hydrolase mRNA and enzyme levels in rat intestine during development. J. Biol. Chem. 265:6978-6983.
3.
Kien C. L., McClead R. E. & Cordero L. (1996) In vivo lactose digestion in preterm infants. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 64:700-705.
4. Shulman R. J. (1999) In vivo measurements of glucose absorption in preterm infants. Biol. Neonate 76:10-18.
5. Shulman R. J., Schanler R. J., Lau C., Heitkemper M., Ou C. N. & Smith E. O. (1998) Early feeding, feeding tolerance, and lactase activity in preterm infants. J. Pediatr. 133:645-649.[Medline]
6. Kien C. L. (1990) Colonic fermentation of carbohydrate in the premature infant: possible relevance to necrotizing enterocolitis. J. Pediatr. 117:S52-S58.[Medline]
7. Kliegman R. M., Walker W. A. & Yolken R. H. (1993) Necrotizing enterocolitis: research agenda for a disease of unknown etiology and pathogenesis. Pediatr. Res. 34:701-708.[Medline]
8. Burrin D. G., Dudley M. A., Reeds P. J., Shulman R. J., Perkinson S. & Rosenberger J. (1994) Feeding colostrum rapidly alters enzymatic activity and the relative isoform abundance of jejunal lactase in neonatal pigs. J. Nutr. 124:2350-2357.
9. Dudley M. A., Burrin D. G., Quaroni A., Rosenberger J., Cook G., Nichols B. L. & Reeds P. J. (1996) Lactase phlorizin hydrolase turnover in vivo in water-fed and colostrum-fed newborn pigs. Biochem. J. 320:735-743.
10.
Dudley M. A., Wykes L. J., Dudley A. W., Jr, Burrin D. G., Nichols B. L., Rosenberger J., Jahoor F., Heird W. C. & Reeds P. J. (1998) Parenteral nutrition selectively decreases protein synthesis in the small intestine. Am. J. Physiol. 274:G131-G137.
11. Freund J. N., Duluc I. & Raul F. (1991) Lactase expression is controlled differently in the jejunum and ileum during development in rats. Gastroenterology 100:388-394.[Medline]
12.
Nudell D. M., Santiago N. A., Zhu J. S., Cohen M. L., Majuk Z. & Gray G. M. (1993) Intestinal lactase: maturational excess expression of mRNA over enzyme protein. Am. J. Physiol. 265:G1108-G1115.
13. Rings E. H., de Boer P. A., Moorman A. F., van Beers E. H., Dekker J., Montgomery R. K., Grand R. J. & Buller H. A. (1992) Lactase gene expression during early development of rat small intestine. Gastroenterology 103:1154-1161.[Medline]
14.
Dudley M. A., Burrin D. G., Wykes L. J., Toffolo G., Cobelli C., Nichols B. L., Rosenberger J., Jahoor F. & Reeds P. J. (1998) Protein kinetics determined in vivo with a multiple-tracer, single-sample protocol: application to lactase synthesis. Am. J. Physiol. 274:G591-G598.
15. Donovan S. M. & Odle J. (1994) Growth factors in milk as mediators of infant development. Ann. Rev. Nutr. 14:147-167.[Medline]
16.
Burrin D. G., Wester T. J., Davis T. A., Amick S. & Heath J. P. (1996) Orally administered IGF-I increases intestinal mucosal growth in formula-fed neonatal pigs. Am. J. Physiol. 270:R1085-R1091.
17.
Philipps A. F., Anderson G. G., Dvorak B., Williams C. S., Lake M., Lebouton A. V. & Koldovsky O. (1997) Growth of artificially fed infant rats: effect of supplementation with insulin-like growth factor I. Am. J. Physiol. 272:R1532-R1529.
18. Xu R. J., Mellor D. J., Birtles M. J., Breier B. H. & Gluckman P. D. (1994) Effects of oral IGF-I or IGF-II on digestive organ growth in newborn piglets. Biol. Neonate 66:280-287.[Medline]
19. Houle V. M., Schroeder E. A., Odle J. & Donovan S. M. (1997) Small intestinal disaccharidase activity and ileal villus height are increased in piglets consuming formula containing recombinant human insulin-like growth factor-I. Pediatr. Res. 42:78-86.[Medline]
20. Ma L. & Xu R. J. (1997) Oral insulin like growth factor-I stimulates intestinal enzyme maturation in newborn rats. Life Sci 61:51-58.[Medline]
21. Park Y. K., Monaco M. H. & Donovan S. M. (1999) Enteral insulin-like growth factor-I augments intestinal disaccharidase activity in piglets receiving total parenteral nutrition. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 29:198-206.[Medline]
22. Young G. P., Taranto T. M., Jonas H. A., Cox A. J., Hogg A. & Werther G. A. (1990) Insulin-like growth factors and the developing and mature rat small intestine: receptors and biological actions. Digestion 46:240-252.
23.
Alexander A. N. & Carey H. V. (1999) Oral IGF-I enhances nutrient and electrolyte absorption in neonatal piglet intestine. Am. J. Physiol. 277:G619-G625.
24.
Burrin D. G., Hadsell D. L. & Fiorotto M. L. (1999) Transgenic hypersecretion of des(13) human insulin-like growth factor I in mouse milk has limited effects on gastrointestinal growth in suckling pups. J. Nutr. 129:51-56.
25. Steeb C. B., Lamb J., Shoubridge C. A., Tivey D. R., Penttila I. & Read L. C. (1998) Systemically but not orogastrically delivered insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and long [Arg3]IGF-I stimulates intestinal disaccharidase activity in two age groups of suckling rats. Pediatr. Res. 44:663-672.[Medline]
26. Houle V. M., Park Y. K., Laswell S. C., Freund G. G., Dudley M. A. & Donovan S. M. (2000) Investigation of three doses of oral insulin-like growth factor-I on jejunal lactase phlorizin hydrolase activity and gene expression and enterocyte proliferation and migration in piglets. Pediatr. Res. 48:497-503.[Medline]
27.
Dudley M. A., Jahoor F., Burrin D. G. & Reeds P. J. (1994) Brush-border disaccharidase synthesis in infant pigs measured in vivo with 2H-leucine. Am. J. Physiol. 267:G1128-G1134.
28. Fan M. Z., Adeola O., McBurney M. I. & Cheeseman C. I. (1998) Kinetic analysis of L-glutamine transport into porcine jejunal enterocyte brush-border membrane vesicles. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Mol. Integr. Physiol. 121:411-422.
29.
Burrin D. G., Stoll B., Jiang R., Hartmann B., Holst J. J., Greeley G. H. & Reeds P. J. (2000) Minimal enteral nutrient requirements for intestinal growth in neonatal piglets: how much is enough?. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 71:1603-1610.
30. MacDonald R. S. (1999) The role of insulin-like growth factors in small intestinal cell growth and development. Horm. Metab. Res. 31:103-113.[Medline]
31.
Jones J. I. & Clemmons D. R. (1995) Insulin-like growth factors and their binding proteins: biological actions. Endocrinol. Rev. 16:3-34.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. L. Hartke, M. H. Monaco, M. B. Wheeler, and S. M. Donovan Effect of a short-term fast on intestinal disaccharidase activity and villus morphology of piglets suckling insulin-like growth factor-I transgenic sows J Anim Sci, October 1, 2005; 83(10): 2404 - 2413. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Donovan, J. L. Hartke, M. H. Monaco, and M. B. Wheeler Insulin-like Growth Factor-I and Piglet Intestinal Development J Dairy Sci, July 1, 2004; 87(13_suppl): E47 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Lane, B. Dvorak, N. K. MacLennan, K. Dvorakova, M. D. Halpern, T. D. Pham, and A. F. Philipps IGF alters jejunal glucose transporter expression and serum glucose levels in immature rats Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): R1450 - R1460. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||