![]() |
|
|

*
Department of Environmental Health Science, College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602 and
Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
3To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: dmac{at}uga.edu
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: copper aggregate daily intake longitudinal temporal variation reliability humans
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Few reports have been published on direct measurements of copper intake
in community settings, especially variation of intake on the temporal
dimension. To improve public health protection worldwide, more
information on increased inspection of copper intake by oral pathways
should be obtained (3)
. In this article, we present the
results of a longitudinal investigation of aggregate daily intake of
copper. The objectives of our research were to assess aggregate daily
intake of copper from ingestion of drinking water, beverage and solid
food; to compare copper intake among those pathways; to characterize
temporal variability of aggregate copper intake; and to evaluate the
reliability of a short-term measure of aggregate intake for
assessment of long-term average intake. Aggregate daily intake of
copper was assessed from concurrent measurements of copper in drinking
water, beverage and solid food samples collected from the study
population.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A stratified random sample of 80 individuals selected from four
contiguous counties and the city of Baltimore, Maryland was enrolled in
the study in September 1995. All participants provided informed consent
under protocols approved by an institutional review board. Details of
the sampling strategy and demographic characteristics of the
participants are reported elsewhere (5)
. Briefly, study
participants included 45 females and 23 males ranging in age from 15 to
84 y (mean = 45) and representing three racial groups:
African-American (n = 13), Caucasian
(n = 54) and Asian/Pacific Islander
(n = 1). All participants were healthy except for
one that provided a self-report of an unspecified cancer. We are
not aware that any participants consumed atypical diets because of
disease status or any other reason. Income of all participants was
above the federal poverty level. As part of a larger questionnaire, all
participants responded in the negative to a question about use of
dietary supplements. Samples from selected environmental and biological
media, as well as questionnaire data, were collected from each
participant in as many as six 1-wk long periods (cycles) approximately
equally spaced between September 1995 and September 1996. Cycles 16
correspond to September 20 through December 23, 1995, January 15
through February 23, 1996, March 27 through April 20, 1996, April 22
through June 15, 1996, June 18 through July 27, 1996 and July 30
through September 18, 1996, respectively.
Sample collection and analysis.
As described in detail by Ryan et al. (6)
, a 1-L
water sample was obtained on d 1 of each sampling period from the
primary source of drinking water identified by the respondent. Aliquots
of samples were directly injected for multielement analysis by
inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry following U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency method 200.8 (7)
. A
questionnaire on daily time budgets and behavior patterns was
administered to participants on each day of the 7-d sampling period for
a given cycle. Responses to the question "How many glasses of water
did you drink today?" were used to obtain drinking water consumption
rates. A nominal serving size of 0.3 L (
10 fl oz) per glass was used
to convert from glasses of water to liters of water consumed per day.
Participants were requested to prepare a duplicate portion of all foods
consumed on four consecutive days during each sampling cycle including
eating events outside of the home. Beverages were collected and stored
separately from solid food samples. The weight of each 4-d solid food
and beverage sample was recorded by a field technician in cycles 26.
Samples were homogenized (solid food separate from beverages) and
analyzed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry for selected
elements in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration laboratory in Kansas
City, Missouri (8)
. Participants in the National Human
Exposure Assessment Survey in Maryland
(NHEXAS-MD)4
self-reported the number of servings of various beverages and solid
food consumed using a food checklist questionnaire. Details of the food
sample collection and questionnaire procedures are reported elsewhere
(6
,9)
. The weights of duplicate beverage and solid samples
were recorded commencing with cycle 2; therefore, aggregate intake
analysis for copper was based on cycles 26.
Quality assurance.
To ensure traceability and accuracy of the data, a series of quality assurance steps was performed. A chain-of-custody form followed each sample and questionnaire from the field, to the laboratory, and, finally, to the database manager. A sample data point not accompanied by a completed chain-of-custody, or vice versa, was omitted from subsequent analysis. Of the samples, 9% were reported as incomplete for reasons including illness, travel, not eating at home, limited food availability and fatigue. No adjustments were made to account for this noncompliance with diet collection protocols.
Detection limits (DL) and recovery efficiencies for copper in each
medium were determined throughout the study. In drinking water, the DL
for copper was constant over the course of the study and equal to 0.2
µg/L. Recovery efficiency from drinking water as measured by samples
fortified with copper at
40 µg/L, a concentration that is within
the range of observed copper levels in drinking water, was 99.5%
(n = 64, SD 5.7%). The average DL for
copper in beverage was 0.9 µg/kg and ranged from 0.78 to 1.04
µg/kg, while the DL for solid food samples was 4.8 µg/kg
(4.205.06 µg/kg). The magnitude of the DL variability in beverage
and solid food was small compared with copper concentrations measured
in field samples. The spike recoveries centered near 100% and varied
little over the study, with cycle-specific means that ranged from
94.0% to 101.0% for beverage and 86.5% to 99.2% for solid food.
Data analysis.
To evaluate temporal variation of copper intake from ingestion of drinking water, beverage and solid food, data analysis was restricted to observations from those individuals with quality-assured data in all three media from at least two monitoring cycles. Each observation in the dataset contained the copper concentration (µg/kg of sample) and average daily consumption (kg of sample/d) for drinking water, beverage and solid food. Copper concentrations in each medium below the respective DL were set to one-half the DL. Average daily intake of copper (µg/d) from each medium was computed as the product of copper concentration and consumption of the sample medium. Aggregate daily intake was computed as sum of average daily intake of copper from those three media. Because the mass of the duplicate solid food and beverage samples was not obtained in cycle 1, the dataset was restricted to observations from cycles 26 for a maximum number of five observations per participant.
Sample weights were determined through consideration of the sampling
design with appropriate weights reflecting differential probability of
selection from the initial population for each stratum. Specific
weights for each participant and cycle combination can be obtained from
the authors. Descriptive statistics for copper concentration and intake
in each medium, aggregate daily intake and food consumption rates were
generated for overall results and for each cycle. The observed data
exhibited positive skewness, while natural log-transformed values
were approximately normally distributed. Therefore, statistical
analyses were performed on natural log-transformed values.
Following Scanlon et al. (9)
, a repeated-measure mixed
model was used to test for significant variability of
log-transformed mean consumption rates, copper concentrations and
average daily copper intake for each medium and aggregate daily intake
among sampling cycles. In mixed model analyses, we treated cycle as a
fixed effect and participants as a random effect. A two-way
generalized linear model was used to test for significant
interindividual variability for each exposure metric controlling for
the effect of sampling cycle. Differences with P
< 0.05 were considered significant.
The statistical analyses and simulation procedures described below were used to evaluate the ability of short-term measures of aggregate copper intake to represent long-term average intake for individuals and to represent the distribution of long-term average intake for the population. These analyses were restricted to individuals who participated in each of cycles 2 through 6 and, thus, provided a complete set of observations from each cycle. In this article, we define long-term average intake as the mean of the five measures of aggregate intake obtained over the year-long study.
Reliability is a concept used to describe the degree to which a
randomly selected single measure of intake taken from a set of measures
for an individual represents their long-term average intake. To
estimate the reliability of a short-term measure of aggregate daily
intake of copper for individuals, we computed the intraclass
correlation coefficient of reliability (R).
R is the ratio of between-person variance to the
total variance observed in a repeated measure study (10)
.
R ranges from 0 to 1, with values near 0 indicating low
reliability and values near 1 indicating high reliability. In this
work, the temporal variability observed is a characterization of
within-person variability, while the total variability is a
combination of the temporal variability and the between-person
variability.
In addition to computing R, simulation was used to describe empirically the accuracy of long-term intake estimates based upon short-term measures for individuals as well as for a population. Four simulations were performed in which one through four cycles of aggregate intake of copper were selected at random from each participant. In the first simulation, one measure of aggregate intake for each individual was selected at random and compared with the corresponding long-term average aggregate intake using methods described later. In the second simulation, two measures of aggregate intake were selected at random for each individual and their mean was compared with the corresponding long-term average aggregate intake. In the third and fourth simulations, three and four measures of aggregate intake were selected at random for each individual and the respective means were compared with the corresponding long-term average intake. In this way, we evaluated concordance between estimates of long-term average based on one through four observations for each person and the reference value of long-term average intake based on five repeated-measures of intake for each person.
Each simulation was comprised of numerous iterations, the exact number being the minimum number of iterations required such that each possible combination of aggregate intake measures for an individual was represented in the simulation. For example, the first simulation, in which one observation of aggregate intake was selected for each participant, consisted of five iterations because there were five observations of aggregate intake per person and there are only five ways (combinations) that one object can be selected from a set of five objects. The second and third simulations consisted of 10 iterations each because there are 10 combinations of pairs and triplets from a set of five observations. The final simulation consisted of five iterations because there are five combinations of quartets drawn from a set of five observations. For each iteration, the mean of the intake measures selected at random for each individual was taken as an estimate of their long-term average intake. In addition, for each iteration, the estimated population distribution of long-term average intake was summarized as the mean and SD of the individual-specific intake estimates. Pearson correlation analysis was used to describe the association between predicted and observed long-term average intake for individuals. Relative differences between predicted averages and observed averages were used to quantify the accuracy of the simulated intake for individuals. Relative differences between predicted and observed population means and SD were used to quantify the accuracy of the simulated intake at the population level.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Short-term and long-term average copper concentrations and intake.
Copper was present at detectable levels in all beverage and solid food
samples and 99% of the drinking water samples. Distributions of copper
concentrations in drinking water, beverage and solid food samples,
consumption rates of these media and intake and aggregate daily intake
contributed from those media are summarized in Table 1
. The distribution of copper concentrations in each medium was skewed
right and ranged over two to three orders of magnitude. The average
daily drinking water consumption rate based on all 263 observations was
1.04 L/d with a range of 0.044.10 L/d, while the mean weights of
average daily duplicate beverage and solid food samples were 0.92 kg/d
and 0.72 kg/d, respectively. As the product of concentration and
consumption of sample medium, the distributions of intake of copper
from the three media were skewed right and ranged over approximately
three to four orders of magnitude. Aggregate daily intake computed as
the sum of intake from the three media was also skewed right and ranged
from 183 µg/d to 6632 µg/d with the mean 923 ± 690 µg/d
(mean ± SD).
|
|
Descriptive statistics of intake of copper from drinking water,
beverage and solid food and aggregate daily intake for each cycle are
shown in Table 2
. Cycle-specific median intake from drinking water varied by a
factor of four across cycles (8.1433.4 µg/d), while those from
beverage ranged from 54.5 to 59.3 µg/d and those from solid food
ranged from 597 to 712 µg/d. In summary, intake through water
exhibited substantial variability but only a small contribution to
aggregate intake; beverage intake was relatively constant and accounted
for < 10% of aggregate intake; and solid food accounted for the
majority of the aggregate intake and most of the variability. In the
repeated-measures mixed model, mean log-transformed intake from
drinking water, solid food and aggregate daily intake varied
significantly (P
0.0024) across cycles, while
variation of mean intake from beverages was marginally significant
(P = 0.0586). Temporal variability of aggregate daily
intake of copper and the medium-specific intake was explored more
fully by fitting the models to the 90 observations obtained from the 18
subjects who participated in all five sampling cycles, i.e., a balanced
dataset. Analyses of copper intake among cycles in the balanced dataset
were consistent with results from the full dataset, suggesting that the
limited number of observations in cycle 5 did not bias the temporal
analysis findings. The interindividual or between-person
variability of intake was highly significant (P < 0.0001) for intake from each medium and for aggregate daily intake.
|
R was 0.50 for aggregate daily intake of copper. In the
simulation method used to illustrate empirically the reliability of
short-term measures of aggregate copper intake, the correlation
coefficient between one randomly selected aggregate intake measure and
observed annual average for individuals was 0.70, and 95% of the
estimates were within 67.0% of the observed values (Table 3
). The correlation coefficient increased to 0.96, and the 95%
confidence interval of the relative difference between estimated and
observed intake decreased to 16.8% when a sample of four observations
was drawn for each respondent (Table 3)
.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals 19941996
(CSFII) conducted by the Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department
of Agriculture is the most recent in a series of U.S. Department of
Agriculture surveys designed to monitor food use and food consumption
patterns in the U.S. population (12)
. Based on 2 or 3-d
food diaries and food composition tables from the CSFII, the mean
copper intake from food and beverage for U.S. adults is estimated to be
1.2 mg/d (13)
. Copper intake reported in the CSFII is 30%
greater than the mean aggregate intake of short-term measures
observed in our study and is equal to the 87th percentile of
short-term aggregate intake in this population drawn from greater
Baltimore, Maryland. In comparison to other U.S. nutrition surveys, our
results are lower than the mean copper intake assessed by the Third
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (female and male
3150 y intake of 1.2 and 1.7 mg/d, respectively) and are comparable
with intake estimates from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Total
Diet Study (female and male 3150 y intake of 0.8 and 1.1 mg/d,
respectively) (14)
. Mean copper intake reported for other
countries and assessed using duplicate diet methods are 1.7 mg/d in
Bangkok, Thailand (15)
, 1.1 mg/d in northeast Spain
(16)
and 1.0 mg/d for children in Duisburg, Germany
(17)
.
The aggregate daily intake of copper observed in this investigation
also can be compared with published levels of acceptable or safe
intake. RDA is defined for essential nutrients at amounts sufficient to
cover individual variations in requirements and provide a margin of
safety above minimal requirements (18)
. In early 2001, a
new RDA for copper of 0.9 mg/d was published by the National
Academy of Sciences (14)
. In the NHEXAS-MD
study, the mean aggregate daily intake of copper based on the
short-term measures (i.e., 4-d composites) was 0.923 mg/d, with a
median of 0.759 mg/d. Annual average aggregate daily intake of copper
was < 0.9 mg/d for 60% of the NHEXAS-MD population. It is
important to note that values similar to the RDA, such as safe
and adequate daily intake, are not recommended for individual
assessment but are instead intended to ensure adequate intake for all
members of a population rather than for specific persons
(11)
.
Weighed food records over multiple days can provide solid data
for nutrient assessment if the recording process does not influence
food consumption choices (11)
. The duplicate plates
collected in this investigation are a form of weighed food record. The
corresponding copper assays provide a more direct measure of copper
intake than can be obtained from the combination of food diary or
questionnaire data and food composition tables. Nevertheless, the
duplicate plate methodology used here is prone to its own types of
errors. First, as stated earlier, 9% of the respondents indicated that
at least some food or beverage was not included in the duplicate plate
composite samples. Second, good quality compliance with duplicate plate
protocols has been reported for up to four consecutive days, but not
much longer (19)
. In our study, the average weight of
duplicate solid food and beverage samples decreased by 16% and 13%,
respectively, from cycles 2 through 6 (9
,20)
. Therefore,
compliance with sampling protocols may have waned with each additional
sampling cycle. Third, the absence of data from October through
November could be a source of error due to seasonal effects on food
availability and use (11)
. We suspect that potential error
resulting from these factors is relatively small, although the
likelihood and magnitude cannot be quantified with a high degree of
confidence.
The principal objective of this study was to determine whether there is
temporal variation in aggregate daily intake of copper and the
medium-specific intake. We found mean log-transformed aggregate
daily intake varied significantly among five sampling periods over a
year and absolute values varied within a range of 30%. Mean
log-transformed copper intake from drinking water and solid food
also varied significantly, while intake from beverage varied marginally
significantly during this period. These results indicate that the
timing of data collection should be considered in copper intake and
risk assessments. Information on periodicity of temporal variation in
aggregate copper intake would be useful; however, multiple years of
data are required to perform such an evaluation. Although statistically
significant, variability of the aggregate copper intake across cycles
may not be substantive in the context of some nutrition and
environmental health applications. Other errors or uncertainties in
health risk assessments (e.g., outcome measurements and
dose-response relationships) may be much larger. For example, only
limited information, primarily from animal models, is available to
determine a safe level of maximum copper intake (3)
.
The temporal dimension of intake of substances in the environment is of interest because biological response to a nutritional deficiency or an environmental challenge can be associated with the duration and timing of the intake. The findings from repeated-measure studies have implications for epidemiology and quantitative risk assessment, tools used to evaluate likelihood of disease as a function of nutritive status or intake of environmental contaminants.
The objective of exposure assessment in epidemiology often is to
categorize (e.g., the upper or lower quartile) or rank individuals by
degree of intake or exposure to the factor hypothesized to be
associated with likelihood of disease. If the intake is reasonably
constant over time, then accurate determination of intake for an
individual can be obtained from a single short-term intake measure.
In the NHEXAS-MD study, we found moderate (r = 0.50) within-person variability of aggregate daily intake of copper
over time, indicating that within-person and between-person
variation contributed equally to total variance in the short-term
measures of aggregate daily intake of copper. Results of the
simulations summarized in Table 3
indicate that the mean of three
short-term copper intake measures for an individual is strongly
correlated (r = 0.90) with the observed long-term
average intake. This information can be used in the design of future
epidemiological studies of copper and health following methods
described elsewhere (10)
.
In quantitative risk assessment, intake data are typically required for
populations rather than for individuals. Emphasis is often placed on
the central tendency or the tails of the intake for a population. The
adverse health effects of chronic copper deficiency are well known;
thus, information on the distribution of chronic copper intake for the
U.S. population is of interest for evaluating public health and
nutritional status. Short-term intake data ascertained through
population-based surveys like the CSFII are a principal source of
information for this type of evaluation. The degree to which a
distribution of short-term (e.g., 24 d) estimates of copper
intake represents the distribution of chronic copper intake is not well
known. The summary of simulation results shown in Table 4
provides
information relevant to this knowledge gap. The estimated population
mean based on five iterations in which one short-term aggregate
copper intake measure selected at random per person was within
20%
of the mean of long-term average intakes based on five
repeated-measures per person. However, the SD for
distributions of single short-term intake measures was only in
marginal agreement with the SD of long-term average
copper intake. Thus, in this population, reliance on short-term
intake measures as surrogates for long-term average intake could
lead to erroneous conclusions about the number of people or fraction of
the population at risk of health effects from copper deficiency or
copper toxicity.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Supported by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under Cooperative Agreement R822038-1, the U.S. Department of Agriculture Hatch Project Number GEO00843 and the University of Georgia Research Foundation. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used: CSFII, Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals; DL, detection limit; NHEXAS-MD, National Human Exposure Assessment Survey in Maryland; R, intraclass correlation coefficient of reliability. ![]()
Manuscript received February 5, 2001. Initial review completed March 8, 2001. Revision accepted April 23, 2001.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Swerts J., Benemariya H., Robberecht H., van Cauwenbergh R., Deelstra H. Daily dietary intake of copper and zinc by several population groups in Belgium: preliminary reports. J. Trace Elem. Electrolytes Health Dis. 1993;7:165-169[Medline]
2. Johnson M. A. Physiology of copper. Encyclopaedia of Food Science, Food Technology and Nutrition 1993:1243-1247 Academic Press London; San Diego;
3. World Health Organization Environmental Health Criteria 200, Copper 1998 World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland.
4. Pettersson R., Rasmussen F. Daily intake of copper from drinking water among young children in Sweden. Environ. Health Perspect. 1999;107:441-446[Medline]
5. Echols S. L., MacIntosh D. L., Hammerstrom K. A., Ryan P. B. Temporal variability of microenvironmental time budgets in Maryland. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1999;9:502-512[Medline]
6. Ryan P. B., Huet N., MacIntosh D. L. Longitudinal investigation of exposure to arsenic, cadmium, and lead in drinking water. Environ. Health Perspect. 2000;108:731-735[Medline]
7. Long S., Martin T. EPA method 200.8: determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by inductively coupled plasmamass spectrometry. Methods for the Determination of Metals in Environmental Samples 1991 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Cincinnati, OH.
8. Food and Drug Administration Standard Operating Procedure for Determination of Trace Elements in NHEXAS Food Composites by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry 1997 U.S. Food and Drug Administration Washington, DC.
9. Scanlon K. A., MacIntosh D. L., Hammerstrom K. A., Ryan P. B. A longitudinal investigation of solid-food based dietary exposure to selected elements. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1999;9:485-493[Medline]
10. Fleiss J. L. Reliability of measurement. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments 1986:1-32 John Wiley & Sons New York, NY.
11. National Academy Press Dietary Reference Intakes: Applications in Dietary Assessment 2000 National Academy Press Washington, DC.
12. Casey P. H., Goolsby S. L., Lensing S. Y., Perloff B. P., Bogle M. L. The use of telephone interview methodology to obtain 24-hour dietary recalls. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1999;99:1406-1411[Medline]
13. U.S. Department of Agriculture Continuing Survey of Food Intakes by Individuals and the Diet and Health Knowledge Survey 19941996 1998 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Beltsville Human Nutrition Research Center/ARS Beltsville, MD.
14. Institute of Medicine Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium, and Zinc 2001:177-204 National Academy Press Washington, DC.
15. Songchitsomboon S., Komindr S., Piaseu N. Zinc and copper intake and sources in healthy adults living in Bangkok and surrounding districts. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1998;61:97-104[Medline]
16. Schuhmacher M., Domingo J. L., Llobet J. M., Corbella J. Dietary intake of copper, chromium and zinc in Tarragona Province, Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 1993;132:3-10[Medline]
17. Laryea M. D., Schnittert B., Kersting M., Wilhelm M., Lombeck I. Macronutrient, copper, and zinc intakes of young: German children as determined by duplicate food samples and diet records. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 1995;39:271-278[Medline]
18. National Academy of Sciences Recommended Dietary Allowances 10th ed. 1989:285 National Academy Press Washington, DC.
19. Thomas K. W., Sheldon L. S., Pellizzari E. D., Handy R. W., Roberds J. M., Berry M. R. Testing duplicate diet sample collection methods for measuring personal dietary exposures to chemical contaminants. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 1997;7:17-36[Medline]
20. MacIntosh D. L., Kabiru C., Scanlon K. A., Ryan P. B. Longitudinal investigation of exposure to arsenic, cadmium, chromium and lead via beverage consumption. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2000;10:196-205[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. M. Klevay Homocysteine Is Not So Paradoxical Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol., October 1, 2008; 28(10): e160 - e160. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Jiang, C. Reynolds, C. Xiao, W. Feng, Z. Zhou, W. Rodriguez, S. C. Tyagi, J. W. Eaton, J. T. Saari, and Y. J. Kang Dietary copper supplementation reverses hypertrophic cardiomyopathy induced by chronic pressure overload in mice J. Exp. Med., March 19, 2007; 204(3): 657 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhou, Y. Jiang, and Y. J. Kang A BRIEF COMMUNICATION: Copper Inhibition of Hydrogen Peroxide-Induced Hypertrophy in Embryonic Rat Cardiac H9c2 Cells Experimental Biology and Medicine, March 1, 2007; 232(3): 385 - 389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. T. Saari, P. G. Reeves, W. T. Johnson, and L. K. Johnson Pinto Beans Are a Source of Highly Bioavailable Copper in Rats J. Nutr., December 1, 2006; 136(12): 2999 - 3004. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Klevay Heart failure improvement from a supplement containing copper Eur. Heart J., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 117 - 117. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Li, L. Wang, D. A. Schuschke, Z. Zhou, J. T. Saari, and Y. J. Kang Marginal Dietary Copper Restriction Induces Cardiomyopathy in Rats J. Nutr., September 1, 2005; 135(9): 2130 - 2136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||