![]() |
|
|


*
Laboratory of Food and Biodynamics, Nagoya University Graduate School of Bioagricultural Sciences, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan and
Department of Pathology and Biology of diseases, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan
1To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: osawat{at}agr.nagoya-u.ac.jp
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: curcumin tetrahydrocurcumin lipid peroxidation oxidative stress rats
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Curcumin is a major yellow pigment in turmeric (the ground rhizome of
Curcuma longa Linn), which is widely used as a spice and
coloring agent in several foods, such as curry, mustard and potato
chips, as well as cosmetics and drugs. A wide range of biological and
pharmacological activities of curcumin has been investigated
(7
,8)
. Curcumin is a potent inhibitor of mutagenesis and
chemically induced carcinogenesis (9
10
11)
. It possesses
many therapeutic properties including anti-inflammatory and
anticancer activities (12)
. Curcumin is currently
attracting strong attention due to its antioxidant potential as well as
its relatively low toxicity to rodents. Curcuminoids also exhibited
antioxidant activities in some in vitro lipid peroxidation systems
(13
,14)
and suppressed
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol 13-acetate-induced
hydrogen peroxide production and oxidized DNA formation in the mouse
epidermis (15)
. Curcumin is an inhibitor of neutrophil
responses (16)
and superoxide generation in macrophages
(17)
.
Tetrahydrocurcumin (THU1; Fig. 1
), one of the major colorless metabolites of curcumin (U1), in the form
of glucuronide conjugate, had stronger antioxidant activity than
curcumin in several in vitro systems (13
,14)
. Therefore,
THU1 has been hypothesized to be one of the major metabolites with
greater physiological and pharmacological activities than U1 in the
intestine. However, there are few data concerning the metabolism and
antioxidant functions of U1 and THU1 in vivo. Furthermore, there is a
controversy as to which molecule would be more effective as a
chemopreventive agent. THU1 has recently been reported to be a less
effective chemopreventive agent in the mouse skin than curcumin
(18
,19)
. However, feeding 0.5% THU1 in the diet
significantly inhibited 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced mouse colon
carcinogenesis, whereas the inhibitory effect of U1 was not significant
(20)
.
|
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 54 male ddY mice (Shizuoka Laboratory Animal Center,
Shizuoka, Japan), weighing 2535 g (6 wk old) were used. Groups were
housed jointly (n = 6) in plastic cages at a
temperature of 23 ± 2°C and an alternating 12 h/12 h light and
dark cycle. All the mice were allowed free access to food and deionized
water (Millipore Japan, Osaka, Japan) for 1 wk to adapt to the new
environment. The mice were divided into three diet groups of 18 mice
each and consumed ad libitum control or experimental diets containing
0.5% U1 or 0.5% THU1 (Table 1
) for 1 mo. Each group was further divided into three groups
of six: untreated control, killed 1 h or 3 h after Fe-NTA
treatment. Mice were killed by cervical dislocation. Blood was taken
from the abdominal aorta and the serum was separated. The liver and
both kidneys of each mouse were immediately removed. The kidneys were
homogenized with a Teflon homogenizer in 10 volumes of 50 mmol/L sodium
phosphate buffer (pH 7.2). The homogenate was centrifuged at 10,000
x g for 10 min and the supernatant was used for the
enzyme activity and thiobarbituric acid assay. The supernatant was
centrifuged at 105,000 x g for 60 min to obtain the
microsome fraction, while the supernatant was considered the cytosolic
fraction.
|
U1 and THU1 were kind gifts of Nikken Fine Chemicals (Shizuoka, Japan),
THU1 (>99% pure) was prepared from U1 (>99% pure) obtained from the
rhizomes of turmeric by hydrogenating the two double bonds conjugated
to the ß-diketone (Fig. 1)
. Ferric nitrate enneahydrate and sodium
carbonate were from Wako (Osaka, Japan) and nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA)
disodium salt was from Nacalai Tesque (Kyoto, Japan). The protein
concentration was measured using the bicinchoninic acid protein
assay reagent obtained from Pierce (Rockford, IL). All the chemicals
used were of analytical quality.
Preparation and injection of Fe-NTA.
The Fe-NTA solution was prepared immediately before use as
previously described (5)
. Briefly, ferric nitrate
enneahydrate and the NTA disodium salt were each dissolved in deionized
water to form 300- and 600-mmol/L solutions. They were mixed at the
volume ratio of 1:2 (molar ratio, 1:4) and the pH was adjusted with
sodium hydrocarbonate to 7.4. Each mouse was given an intraperitoneal
injection of Fe-NTA at a dose of 5 mg Fe/kg body.
Quantitative analysis of curcuminoids.
A JASCO MD-910 multiwavelength detector (Tokyo, Japan) was used with
the HPLC instrument. A Devolosil ODS-HG-5 column (0.46 cm o.d. x 25
cm; Nomura Chemical, Aichi, Japan) was used for the analysis. The
tissue homogenates or the serums with or without
glucuronidase/sulfatase treatment were used for the analysis
(21)
. The enzyme treatment was performed as follows: 200
µL of 2 volumes tissue homogenates or serums were treated with
ß-glucuronidase (500 U) and sulfatase (40 U) in 10 mmol/L PBS (pH 5.0
containing 20 g/L ascorbic acid, 0.1 g/L EDTA). The analysis was
carried out with a mobile phase of acetonitrile/H2O (1 g/L
trifluoroacetic acid); (50:50 v/v) at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. The
peak corresponding to U1 was detected at 430 nm after 13 min and THU1
at 280 nm after 10 min.
Measurement of antioxidative activity.
In previous study, single intraperitoneal Fe-NTA treatment (5 mg
Fe/kg body) caused oxidative stress, monitored by the accumulation of
lipid peroxidation products and by the formation of 8-OHdG in the time
course study (22)
. The renal 2-thiobarbituric acid
reactive substances (TBARS) or 8-OHdG content has been shown to reach
the highest level 3 h or 1 h after intraperitoneal injection
of Fe-NTA, respectively. Hence, we subsequently assessed the
formation of the 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE)-modified proteins, as one of
the major oxidatively modified proteins, in the kidney of mice treated
with Fe-NTA. Amounts of TBARS, HNE-modified proteins and 8-OHdG
levels were measured by the assays as previously described
(22)
.
Electron spin resonance (ESR) spectral measurement.
ESR spectra were measured at room temperature with an ESR spectrometer
(JES-TE2000; JEOL,Tokyo,Japan) according to the method of Kawabata et al. (23)
after slight modification.
5,5'-Dimethyl-1-pyrroline-1-oxide (DMPO; 10 µL), a radical trapping
agent, was added to 200 µL of each tissue homogenate
(n = 4, 10 g protein/L). Then, Fe-NTA
(final concentration 10 mmol/L as Fe) was added and mixed well for 10
min. Formation of the DMPO-trapping radical spectra was calculated
as the integrated area of the signal.
Enzyme assays.
Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) activity was measured by NADPH oxidation
in a coupled reaction system containing t-butyl hydroperoxide and
oxidized glutathione (24)
. Assays of NADPH:quinone
reductase (QR) activity was determined by a procedure reported by
Benson et al. (25)
after slight modification. The
glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity toward
1-chloro-2, 4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) as a substrate was measured
according to the method of Habig et al. (26)
, and GST
activity toward 4-HNE was measured according to the method of Alin et
al. (27)
. Catalase (28)
and superoxide
dismutase (29
,30)
activities were determined as described.
Statistical analysis.
Data are expressed as means ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed by means of a two-way ANOVA. All post hoc multiple comparisons were made with the Scheffé test. The statisitical significance level was set at 5% (P < 0.05). StatView software (StatView J-4.5; Abacus Concepts, Berkeley, CA) was used for the analysis in each case.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Body weight and weights of liver and kidney were not different among the three groups of mice (data not shown), suggesting that the U1 and THU1 diets were not negatively affect food consumption.
Concentrations of U1 and THU1.
In liver and serum, most of the U1 and THU1 was present as conjugated
glucuronides or sulfates; only a small amount of the free forms were
detected (Tables 2
and
3
). A small amount of U1 and its conjugates (as sulfates and
glucuronides) were found in the serum of the U1 diet group, but it was
not detected in the liver (Table 2)
or kidney (data not shown). The
THU1 concentrations and its conjugates were larger than those of U1 of
the liver and serum of the U1 group. Thus, when U1 is fed, it is
transformed into its metabolite, THU1. The concentrations of THU1 and
its conjugates in the liver and serum were higher in THU1 group than in
the U1 group (Table 3)
. U1 and THU1 were not detected in the kidney
because of the limited sensitivity of HPLC analysis.
|
|
The THU1 diet significantly suppressed the increase in lipid
peroxidation and oxidative modification of DNA induced by Fe-NTA
(Fig. 2
). The U1 diet significantly suppressed the HNE-modified protein
concentration in kidney but did not significantly decrease TBARS or
8-OHdG concentrations relative to the Fe-NTA-treated controls. Thus,
THU1 generally had stronger inhibitory effects than U1.
|
Figure 3A
shows the TBARS levels in the renal homogenates of controls
after treatment with U1 or THU1 at the concentrations indicated,
followed by direct Fe-NTA administration. The TBARS contents in the
control renal homogenates decreased dose dependently. The effect of
THU1 was not significantly different from that of U1. Figure 3B
, and C
shows the ESR spectra of radical spin adducts of DMPO generated from Fe-NTA treatment in the presence of
U1 and THU1. THU1 inhibited the formation of the DMPO-trapping
radicals mediated by Fe-NTA treatment (Fig. 3C
). U1 was
not significant.
|
Activities of superoxide dismutase and catalase were decreased by
Fe-NTA treatment and did not differ between the U1 and THU1 diet
groups (data not shown). However, suppression of GPx activity was less
in U1 and THU1 groups than in controls (Fig. 4A
). Cytochrome P450 activity, the phase I detoxification
enzyme, was not affected (data not shown), while suppression of the
NADPH:QR and GST activities, the phase II detoxification enzymes, were
inhibited in the THU1 group (Fig. 4B
, C
, D
). U1 was not
significant. In the THU1 group, the phase II enzymes generally were
induced more than in the U1 group. The THU1 diet not only inhibited the
decrease in whole GST activity due to Fe-NTA treatment, but also
induced stronger GST activity toward HNE (Fig. 4D
) than
those of the untreated control kidney sample.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The results of our studies suggest that THU1 has better absorption
properties than U1 (Tables 2
and 3)
. If the same amount of THU1 diet
was given as that of U1, the amounts of THU1 and its conjugates (as
sulfates and glucuronides) were larger in the THU1 group than in the U1
group. In contrast, the amounts of U1 and its conjugates were small in
both groups. THU1 had the same level of antioxidant capacity as U1 in
vitro (Fig. 3A
). However, THU1 was more effective than U1.
Indeed, ESR spectra signal of the radical spin adducts of DMPO mediated
by Fe-NTA was more reduced in the THU1-mixed kidney homogenate than
in the U1-mixed homogenate, which did not differ from the control
(Fig. 3B
, and C
).
Preferential induction of phase II biotransformation enzymes such as
GST and NADPH:QR (as opposed to phase I biotrans-formation enzymes
of the cytochrome P450 systems) has been suggested to be a possible
mechanism for the effects of a number of antioxidants in cancer
prevention (32
33
34)
. Orally administered U1 has been shown
to slightly increase GST activity toward CDNB in mouse liver even with
a high dose (35)
. However, GST activity toward HNE is
relatively high in mouse liver (36)
. GST consist of
several catalytically distinct isozymes, each of whose expression is
differentially regulated by the oxidant or antioxidant environment
within the cell (37)
. Therefore, the present studies were
designed to investigate the effects of oral U1 and THU1 administration
on GSH-linked antioxidant defenses, including GPx activity and GST
activities toward CDNB and toward HNE in the mouse kidney after
Fe-NTA injection.
We found that the antioxidant effects of U1 generally were augmented
through restoration of decreased GPx and the HNE-metabolizing GST
isozymes activities by Fe-NTA (Fig. 4)
. The effect of THU1 was
stronger than that of U1 in these antioxidant enzyme inductions. In the
present study, it was also shown that there was a significant effect of
oral THU1 exposure during phase II enzyme induction (Fig. 4)
. Namely,
in the THU1 group, the GST activity toward HNE was induced more than in
the untreated control group. This induction might result from THU1
exposure alone. More detailed study to clarify the molecular mechanisms
concerning how these antioxidants induce enzymes is currently in
progress.
Phase I enzymes inactivate a foreign substance by a redox reaction and
hydrolysis. Cytochrome P450, one of the major phase I enzymes, is,
thus, induced by factors, such as drugs, industrial chemical
substances, food additives, tobacco, alcohol and various food
components. However, a variety of chemical substances is also activated
by cytochrome P450. Compounds of this kind have been classified either
as bifunctional inducers, which elevate both the phase I and phase II
enzymes, or monofunctional inducers, which selectively elevate the
phase II enzymes. The induction of the phase I enzymes, such as
cytochrome P450 isozymes, is required for the metabolic disposal of
xenobiotics (38)
, but is also considered to be a risk
factor due to the potential of activating procarcinogens
(39)
. Therefore, the finding of U1 and THU1 as
monofunctional inducers gives them biologically important merit.
In conclusion, the present study provided clear evidence for the suppression of oxidative stress-induced renal damage by dietary U1 and THU1. U1 and THU1 are probably working in two different ways: direct chelating or scavenging effects and induction of the antioxidant enzymes (monofunctional inducers). The in vivo antioxidant effects of THU1 were greater than were those of U1. THU1 may be more easily absorbed than U1 from the gastrointestinal tract. THU1 also has some advantages as a food additive because it is colorless and yet is easily prepared by the standard hydrogenation of U1. Additional studies of the effects of curcuminoids on oxidative stress, especially on their molecular mechanisms, are necessary. We believe that THU1 has the potential to be used as a chemopreventive agent in humans.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Manuscript received January 12, 2001. Initial review completed February 8, 2001. Revision accepted May 14, 2001.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Halliwell B., Gutteridge J.M.C. Free Radicals in Biology and Medicine 1999 Clarendon Press Oxford, England.
2. Okada S., Midorikawa O. Induction of rat renal adenocarcinoma by Fe-nitrilotriacetate (Fe-NTA). Jpn. Arch. Intern. Med. 1982;29:485-491
3.
Li J.-L., Okada S., Hamazaki S., Ebina Y., Midorikawa O. Subacute nephrotoxicity and induction of renal cell carcinoma in mice treated with ferric nitrilotriacetate. Cancer Res 1987;47:1867-1869
4. Ebina Y., Okada S., Hamazaki S., Ogino F., Li J. L., Midorikawa O. Nephrotoxicity and renal cell carcinoma after use of iron- and aluminum-nitrilotriacetate complexes in rats. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1986;76:107-113
5.
Toyokuni S., Uchida K., Okamoto K., Hattori-Nakakuki Y., Hiai H., Stadtman E. R. Formation of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal-modified proteins in the renal proximal tubules of rats treated with a renal carcinogen, ferric nitrilotriacetate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994;91:2616-2620
6. Uchida K., Fukuda A., Kawakishi S., Hiai H., Toyokuni S. A renal carcinogen ferric nitrilotriacetate mediates a temporary accumulation of aldehyde-modified proteins within cytosolic compartment of rat kidney. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1995;317:405-411[Medline]
7. Govindarajan V. S. Turmeric chemistry, technology and quality. CRC Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1980;12:199-301
8. Huang M. T., Rovertson F. M., Lysz T., Ferraro T., Wang Z. Y., Georgiadis C. A., Laskin J. D., Conney A. H. Inhibition effects of curcumin on carcinogenesis in mouse epidermis. Huang M. T. Ho C. T. Lee C. Y. eds. Phenolic Compounds in Food and Their Effects on Health II: Antioxidants and Cancer Prevention 1992;2:338-349 American Chemical Society Washington, DC.
9. Azuine M. A., Bhide S. V. Chemopreventive effect of turmeric against stomach and skin tumors induced by chemical carcinogens in Swiss mice. Nutr. Cancer 1992;17:77-83[Medline]
10.
Rao C. V., Rivenson A., Simi B., Reddy B. S. Chemoprevention of colon carcinogenesis by dietary curcumin, a naturally occurring plant phenolic compounds. Cancer Res 1995;55:259-266
11. Nakamura Y., Ohto Y., Murakami A., Osawa T., Ohigashi H. Inhibitory effects of curcumin and tetrahydrocurcuminoids on the tumor promoter-induced reactive oxygen species generation in leukocytes in vitro and in vivo. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 1998;89:361-370[Medline]
12. Srimal R. C., Dhawan B. N. Pharmacology of diferuloyl methane (curcumin), a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory activity of curcumin analogues. Indian J. Med. Res. 1973;75:574-578
13. Osawa T., Sugiyama Y., Inayoshi M., Kawakishi S. Antioxidative activity of tetrahydrocurcuminoids. Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 1995;59:1609-1612[Medline]
14. Sugiyama Y., Kawakishi S., Osawa T. Involvement of the ß-diketone moiety in the antioxidative mechanism of tetrahydrocurcuminoids. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1996;52:519-525[Medline]
15.
Huang M. T., Wei M., Yen P., Xie J. G., Han J., Frenkel K., Grunberger D., Conney A. H. Inhibitory effects of topical application of low doses of curcumin on 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced tumor promotion and oxidized DNA bases in mouse epidermis. Carcinogenesis 1997;18:83-88
16. Srrivastava R. Inhibition of neutrophil response by curcumin. Agents Actions 1989;28:298-303[Medline]
17. Joe B., Lokesh B. R. Role of capsaicin, curcumin and dietary n-3 fatty acids in lowering the generation of reactive oxygen species in rat peritoneal macrophages. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1994;1224:255-263[Medline]
18.
Huang M. T., Wei M., Lu Y. P., Chang R. L., Fisher C., Manchand P. S., Newmark H. L., Conney A. H. Effects of curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, bisdemethoxycurcumin and tetrahydrocurcumin on 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced tumor promotion. Carcinogenesis 1995;16:2493-2497
19. Conney A. H., Lou Y.-R., Xie J.-G., Osawa T., Newmark H. L., Liu Y., Chang R. L., Huang M. T. Some perspectives on dietary inhibition of carcinogenesis: studies with curcumin and tea. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1997;216:234-245[Abstract]
20.
Kim J. M., Araki S., Kim D. J., Park C. B., Takasuka N., Toriyama H. B., Ota T., Nir Z., Khachik F., Shimidzu N., Tanaka Y., Osawa T., Uraji T., Murakoshi M., Nishino H., Tsuda H. Chemopreventive effects of carotenoids and curcumins on mouse colon carcinogenesis after 1,2-dimethylhydrazine initiation. Carcinogenesis 1998;19:81-85
21. Ahmadi M., Nichollus P. J., Smith H. J., Spencer P.S.J., Ryatt M. S., Spragg B. P. Metabolism of beclamide after a single oral dose in man: quantitative studies. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 1995;47:876-878[Medline]
22.
Okada K., Wangpoengtrakul C., Osawa T., Toyokuni S., Tanaka K., Uchida K. 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal-mediated impairment of intracellular proteolysis during oxidative stress. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:23787-23793
23. Kawabata T., Awai M., Kohno M. Generate of active oxygen species by iron nitrilotriacetate. Acta Med. Okayama 1986;40:163-173
24. Tappel A. L. Glutathione peroxidase and hydroperoxides. Methods Enzymol 1978;11:506-513
25.
Benson A. M., Hunkeler M. J., Talalay P. Increase of NAD(P)H: quinone reductase by dietary antioxidants: possible role in protection against carcinogenesis and toxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1980;77:5216-5220
26.
Habig W. H., Pabst M. J., Jakoby W. B. Glutathione S-transferases: the first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 1974;249:7130-7139
27. Alin P., Danielson U. H., Mannervik B. 4-Hydroxyalk-2-enals are substrates for glutathione transferase. FEBS Lett 1985;179:267-270[Medline]
28.
Suzuki K., Miyazawa N., Nakata T., Seo H. G., Sugiyama T., Taniguchi N. High copper and iron levels and expression of Mn-superoxide dismutase in mutant rats displaying hereditary hepatitis and hepatoma (LEC rats). Carcinogenesis 1993;14:1881-1884
29. Beutler E. Red Cell Metabolism: A Manual of Biochemical Methods 1975:89-90 Grune and Stratton Orland USA.
30. Aebi H. Catalase Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, II 1974:673-683 Academic Press New York, NY.
31. Nakayama T., Haraguchi I., Hashimoto K., Sugiyama Y., Osawa T. Suppresion of hydrogen peroxide-induced cytotoxity toward chinese hamster lung fibroblasts by chemically modified curcumin. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 1997;3:74-76
32.
Song L. L., Kosmeder J. W., Lee S. K., Gerhauser C., Lantvit D., Moon R. C., Moriarty R. M., Pezzuto J. M. Cancer chemopreventive activity mediated by 4'-bromoflavone, a potent inducer of phase II detoxification enzymes. Cancer Res 1999;59:578-585
33.
Wattenberg L. W. Chemoprevention of cancer. Cancer Res 1985;45:1-8
34. Talalay P. Mechanisms of induction of enzymes that protect against chemical carcinogenesis. Adv. Enzyme Regul. 1989;28:237-250[Medline]
35. Susan M., Rao M.N.A. Induction of glutathione S-transferase activity by curcumin in mice. Drug Res 1992;42:962-964[Medline]
36. Piper J. T., Singhal S. S., Salameh M. S., Torman R. T., Awasthi Y. C., Awasthi S. Mechanisms of anticarcinogenic properties of curcumin: the effect of curcumin on glutathione linked detoxification enzymes in rat liver. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 1998;30:445-456[Medline]
37. Hayes J. D., Pulford D. J. The glutathione S-transferase supergene family: regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Molec. Biol. 1995;30:445-600[Medline]
38. Williams R. T. Comparative patterns of drug metabolism. Fed. Proc. 1967;26:1029-1039[Medline]
39. Yang C. S., Smith T. J., Hong J. Y. Cytochrome P-450 enzymes as targets for chemoprevention against chemical carcinogenesis and toxicity: opportunities and limitations. Cancer Res 1994;54:1982-1986
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. N. Begum, M. R. Jones, G. P. Lim, T. Morihara, P. Kim, D. D. Heath, C. L. Rock, M. A. Pruitt, F. Yang, B. Hudspeth, et al. Curcumin Structure-Function, Bioavailability, and Efficacy in Models of Neuroinflammation and Alzheimer's Disease J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., July 1, 2008; 326(1): 196 - 208. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V Eybl, D Kotyzova, P Cerna, and J Koutensky Effect of melatonin, curcumin, quercetin, and resveratrol on acute ferric nitrilotriacetate (Fe-NTA)-induced renal oxidative damage in rats Human and Experimental Toxicology, April 1, 2008; 27(4): 347 - 353. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. K. Basu, L. Kole, S. Kubota, and I. S. Owens HUMAN UDP-GLUCURONOSYLTRANSFERASES SHOW ATYPICAL METABOLISM OF MYCOPHENOLIC ACID AND INHIBITION BY CURCUMIN Drug Metab. Dispos., July 1, 2004; 32(7): 768 - 773. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||