Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Uthus, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davis, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Uthus, E.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2001;131:1872.)
© 2001 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Articles

Reply to Craig A. Cooney

Cindy D. Davis and Eric Uthus

Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center Grand Forks, ND 58203


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 REFERENCES
 
Dear Editor:

We appreciate Dr. Cooney’s interest in our article and thank him for his positive comments. We agree with Dr. Cooney that determining the role for dietary arsenic on the methylation of DNA in vivo is important for understanding human health effects and for determining safe exposure limits for arsenic. In our study, arsenic tended (P < 0.08, two-way ANOVA) to cause hypomethylation of liver DNA in vivo (1)Citation . Dr. Cooney suggests that additional statistical analysis would show a significant effect of dietary arsenic on liver DNA methylation [Fig. 3 of (1)Citation ] based on a mathematical approach using 5 coin tosses as an example. However, comparing the means (heights of the bar graphs) ignores the variability in the data. Although graphically the means for the rats fed 5 µg/g dietary arsenic appear larger than the means for those not supplemented with dietary arsenic, there were no significant differences in any of the five selenium groups when assessed by t-tests. Thus, his analogy is not valid because it assumes that there are differences in each of the treatments between the arsenic-supplemented and nonsupplemented rats, when in fact no differences exist.

Because determining the role of dietary arsenic on methylation of DNA in vivo is important, we want to emphasize that the diets referred to by Dr. Cooney as "arsenic free" actually contain ~44 ng As/g (1)Citation . This amount of arsenic is similar to a proposed requirement for arsenic (25–50 ng/g) by Uthus (2)Citation . Recent findings in Uthus’ laboratory showed that compared with rats fed adequate arsenic, those fed either deficient (<5 ng/g) or excess (50 µg/g) arsenic had global DNA hypomethylation in the liver. Thus, it is possible that the trend of greater methyl acceptance (indicative of hypomethylation) seen in the rats fed supplemental arsenic [Fig. 3 of (1)Citation ] is a similar phenomenon. That is, those fed the diets supplemented with 5 µg As/g received an amount of arsenic that started to induce DNA hypomethylation. Perhaps if the rats were fed diets containing >5 µg As/g, the change would have been significant. On the other hand, it should be noted that recent findings by Uthus (unpublished observations) showed that low arsenic intake (<5 ng/g diet) also induced hypomethylation compared with rats fed 0.5 µg/g. To summarize, arsenic is thought to have a role in methionine metabolism and it has been proposed by one of us (E.O.U.) that feeding diets containing too little or too much arsenic will cause DNA hypomethylation [that is, you will see a response similar to that shown in Fig. 1 of (1)Citation ]. Studies are ongoing at the USDA, ARS Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center by Dr. Uthus to ascertain the consequences of hypomethylation of DNA caused by feeding laboratory animals very low (<5 ng/g) or moderately elevated (>5 µg/g) arsenic.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 REFERENCES
 

1. Davis C. D., Uthus E. O., Finley J. W. Dietary selenium and arsenic affect DNA methylation in vitro in Caco-2 cells and in vivo in rat liver and colon. J. Nutr. 2000;130:2903-2909[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Uthus E.O. Estimation of safe and adequate daily intake for arsenic. Mertz W. Abernathy C. O. Olin S. S. eds. Risk Assessment of Essential Elements 1994:273-282 ISLI Press Washington, DC.





This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Uthus, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Davis, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Uthus, E.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2001 by American Society for Nutrition