![]() |
|
|
Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center Grand Forks, ND 58203
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We appreciate Dr. Cooneys interest in our article and thank him for
his positive comments. We agree with Dr. Cooney that determining the
role for dietary arsenic on the methylation of DNA in vivo is important
for understanding human health effects and for determining safe
exposure limits for arsenic. In our study, arsenic tended (P
< 0.08, two-way ANOVA) to cause hypomethylation of liver DNA
in vivo (1)
. Dr. Cooney suggests that additional
statistical analysis would show a significant effect of dietary arsenic
on liver DNA methylation [Fig. 3 of (1)
] based on a
mathematical approach using 5 coin tosses as an example. However,
comparing the means (heights of the bar graphs) ignores the variability
in the data. Although graphically the means for the rats fed 5
µg/g dietary arsenic appear larger than the means for
those not supplemented with dietary arsenic, there were no significant
differences in any of the five selenium groups when assessed by
t-tests. Thus, his analogy is not valid because it assumes
that there are differences in each of the treatments between the
arsenic-supplemented and nonsupplemented rats, when in fact no
differences exist.
Because determining the role of dietary arsenic on methylation of DNA
in vivo is important, we want to emphasize that the diets referred to
by Dr. Cooney as "arsenic free" actually contain
44 ng As/g
(1)
. This amount of arsenic is similar to a proposed
requirement for arsenic (2550 ng/g) by Uthus (2)
. Recent
findings in Uthus laboratory showed that compared with rats fed
adequate arsenic, those fed either deficient (<5 ng/g) or excess (50
µg/g) arsenic had global DNA hypomethylation in the liver.
Thus, it is possible that the trend of greater methyl acceptance
(indicative of hypomethylation) seen in the rats fed supplemental
arsenic [Fig. 3 of (1)
] is a similar phenomenon. That
is, those fed the diets supplemented with 5 µg As/g
received an amount of arsenic that started to induce DNA
hypomethylation. Perhaps if the rats were fed diets containing >5
µg As/g, the change would have been significant. On the
other hand, it should be noted that recent findings by Uthus
(unpublished observations) showed that low arsenic intake (<5 ng/g
diet) also induced hypomethylation compared with rats fed 0.5
µg/g. To summarize, arsenic is thought to have a role in
methionine metabolism and it has been proposed by one of us (E.O.U.)
that feeding diets containing too little or too much arsenic will cause
DNA hypomethylation [that is, you will see a response similar to
that shown in Fig. 1 of (1)
]. Studies are ongoing at the
USDA, ARS Grand Forks Human Nutrition Research Center by Dr. Uthus to
ascertain the consequences of hypomethylation of DNA caused by feeding
laboratory animals very low (<5 ng/g) or moderately elevated (>5
µg/g) arsenic.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Davis C. D., Uthus E. O., Finley J. W. Dietary selenium and arsenic affect DNA methylation in vitro in Caco-2 cells and in vivo in rat liver and colon. J. Nutr. 2000;130:2903-2909
2. Uthus E.O. Estimation of safe and adequate daily intake for arsenic. Mertz W. Abernathy C. O. Olin S. S. eds. Risk Assessment of Essential Elements 1994:273-282 ISLI Press Washington, DC.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||