![]() |
|
|
,**2
*
Cell Biology and Aging Section (151E), Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA 94121;
Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, CA; and
**
Centre International de Recherche Daniel Carasso, 92350, Le Plessis-Robinson, France.
2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: coach{at}itsa.ucsf.edu.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
0.05).
This difference was associated with enhanced in vitro antibody
secretion by cultured lymphocytes isolated from the Peyers patches
and the intestinal lamina propria (+180%, P
0.05). These enhanced responses were found only in the young rats.
However, the nonspecific serum IgG titer was higher (>120%,
P
0.05) and the anti-CT IgG titer was lower
(-80%, P
0.05), in both young and old
kefir-fed rats compared with their respective controls.
Nevertheless, these results demonstrate that a kefir-supplemented
diet affects the intestinal mucosal and systemic immune responses to
intraduodenal CT differently in young and old rats. Most importantly,
our data suggest that orally administered kefir enhances the specific
intestinal mucosal immune response against CT in young adult, but not
in senescent rats.
KEY WORDS: kefir intestinal immunity cholera toxin aging rats
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Kefir is a stirred beverage made from milk fermented with a complex
mixture of bacteria, including various species of lactobacilli,
lactococci, leuconostocs, and aceterobacteria and yeasts (both
lactose-fermenting and nonlactose-fermenting). Kefir differs from
yogurt and other fermented milks in that kefir grains (small clusters
of microorganisms held together in a polysaccharide matrix) or mother
cultures from grains are added to milk and cause fermentation
(Hallé et al. 1994
). Despite the lack of data,
recent studies suggest antibacterial, immunologic and antitumor effects
of kefir in animals (Furukawa et al. 1990 and 1991
,
Zacconi et al. 1995
). Kefir and sphingomyelin isolated
from the lipids in kefir have been reported to stimulate the immune
system in both in vitro and in vivo studies (Furukawa et al. 1991
, Osada et al. 1994
). Kefir also exhibits
antimicrobial activity in vitro against a wide variety of
gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria and some fungi
(Cevikbas et al. 1994
, Zacconi et al. 1995
).
Aging compromises the intestinal mucosal immune response in animals and
humans [see Schmucker and Owen (1997)
for a review].
Consequences of this immune dysfunction include a decline in the
efficacy of mucosal vaccines, as well as increases in the incidences of
infectious diseases and in the associated rates of morbidity and
mortality in the elderly (Jeandel et al. 1996
,
Owen and Lew 1995
, Schmucker et al. 1985
). Although serum IgA levels increase in the elderly, the
mucosal responses to antigenic challenges decline in rodents, primates
and humans as a function of increasing age (Arranz et al. 1992
, Ebersole et al. 1985
, Paganelli et al. 1994
, Smith et al. 1983
, Taylor et al. 1992
). Significant declines in the intestinal IgA antibody
responses to intraduodenal cholera holotoxin (CT) have been
demonstrated in rats (Schmucker et al. 1988)
and rhesus
macaques (Taylor et al. 1992
). Although the perception
persists that eating functional foods has beneficial effects on health
maintenance during aging, there are few studies in which the effects of
probiotic consumption have been examined. Therefore, this study was
designed to assess the immumodulatory effect of kefir on the intestinal
mucosal immune response to cholera toxin in young adult and senescent
rats.
Lactobacilli may stimulate intestinal mucosal immunity in elderly
humans (De Simone et al. 1992 and 1993
, Van de Water et al. 1999
). De Simone et al. (1992)
noted an increase in the B-cell concentration of peripheral blood
and a decrease in colonic inflammatory infiltration in a group of
elderly subjects (>70 y) after ingestion of Bifidobacterium
bifidum and L. acidophilus. Long-term yogurt
consumption increases interferon-
production by adult human T
lymphocytes and decreases allergic symptoms in elderly people
(Halpern et al. 1991
, Van de Water et al. 1999
). However, there is little information concerning the role
of probiotics as adjuvants or the mechanisms whereby these organisms
enhance mucosal immunity, including in the elderly.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Kefir was prepared by the Centre International de Recherche Daniel Carasso, Le Plessis-Robinson, France. It consisted of ultrahigh temperature sterilized bovine milk with a fat content of < 2% (commercial source) fermented overnight by the addition of kefir grains. Each batch was made with the same starter kefir grains, using the same fermentation conditions to ensure that the probiotic constituents were similar, stored at 4°C and used within 3 wk. The proximate composition of the kefir corresponds to the milk composition used during the fermentation, i.e., 3.5 g/kg protein, 4 g/kg carbohydrate and 2 g/kg fat.
Animals
Male Fischer 344/NHsd rats from the National Institute on Aging colony (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) were used throughout these studies. Rats, in good health and showing no signs of disease, were divided into young adult (6 mo old) and senescent (26 mo old) age groups. Rats aged 26 mo are beyond 50% survivorship and are considered senescent. The rats were housed individually under barrier conditions and consumed the standard NIH-31 open formula (18 g/kg protein, 4 g/kg fat, 5 g/kg fiber, 8 g/kg vitamin and minerals, NIH national stock number 871001-0058438) and water ad libitum. All rats were maintained in accordance with the guidelines of the Committee on Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources.
Experimental design
Diets. Rats were acclimated for 1 wk before initiation of experiments. They were segregated into four groups of 5 rats each as follows: young kefir, old kefir, young control and old control. The young and old kefir groups received kefir in addition to drinking water each night for 7 d (d 17) before immunization and throughout the remainder of the study, i.e., until killed on d 28.
Cholera toxin immunization.
Rats were immunized intraduodenally with CT (100 µg,
List Biological Laboratories, Campbell, CA) in 0.5 mL 0.01mol/L PBS (pH
7.4) containing 2g/L gelatin. A small midabdominal laparotomy was
performed under isofluorane anesthesia (Marsam Pharmaceuticals, Cherry
Hill, NJ), and CT was introduced directly into the duodenum immediately
distal to the sphincter of Oddi using a tuberculin syringe with a
28-gauge needle (Schmucker et al. 1988
). Rats were
primed on d 7 and boosted on d 21. Seven days after boosting (d 28),
groups of rats were food deprived overnight and killed by isofluorane
anesthesia followed by bilateral thoracotomy.
Serum collection and preparation of cell suspensions
Blood samples were collected from the inferior vena cava while
the rats were under anesthesia. After overnight incubation at 4°C and
centrifugation at 1000 x g for 15 min, the serum was
isolated, divided in aliquots and stored at -80°C until used. Single
mononuclear cell suspensions were prepared from spleen (SP) and
mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN) by teasing the tissue through sterile
100-µm cell strainers (Falcon, Becton Dickinson, Bedford,
MA). The resulting single-cell suspensions were centrifuged at 2500
x g for 28 min over a density separation medium
(Lympholyte-Rat, Cerdarlane Laboratories Limited, Toronto, Canada). The
cells were washed 3 times and suspended in RPMI-1640 medium containing
10% fetal bovine serum, 25 mmol/L HEPES, 2 mmol/L glutamine, 1 x 105 U/L penicillin, 100 mg/L
streptomycin and 50 mg/L gentamicin (complete medium). Peyers patches
(PP) were excised from the small intestine and cell suspensions were
prepared by mechanical disruption using a syringe, a 19-gauge needle
and a sterile cell strainer. Tissue fragments were removed by filtering
the cell suspension through a glass wool column. Lamina propria (LP)
lymphocytes were isolated from PP-free small intestinal segments
previously flushed with calcium/magnesium-free Hanks balanced salt
solution as described previously (Lycke 1986
). The
tissue was dissociated by several consecutive incubations in complete
medium containing 1 x 104 U/L
of collagenase (type VII, Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO). The resultant
cell suspensions were diluted to final concentrations in complete
medium, and cell viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion.
In vitro cell cultures
Suspensions of SP, MLN, PP and LP mononuclear cells (1 x 104 and 1 x 106 cells/well) were incubated in complete medium in 96-well round-bottom culture plates for 5 d at 37°C in a 5% CO2 environment.
Detection of antibody-secreting cells by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT)
The numbers of IgA- and anti-CT IgAsecreting cells were
determined by ELISPOT assay (Czerkinsky et al. 1983
).
Nitrocellulose plates (Millititer HA, Millipore, Bedford, MA) were
coated overnight with either sheep anti-rat IgA (5 mg/L, The
Binding Site, San Diego, CA) for IgA-secreting cells or
monosialoganglioside-GM1 (Sigma) followed by CT (5 mg/L) for CT
IgAsecreting cells. The plates were blocked with complete medium (3 h
at 37°C) and inoculated with 100 µL of diluted cell
suspensions. After overnight incubation (37°C), the cells were washed
10 times with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20. IgA-secreting cells
were detected by incubating in 100 µL of biotinylated goat
anti-rat IgA (2 g/L at 1:2000 dilution, Rockland Immunochemicals,
Gilbertsville, PA) in PBS-Tween 20 (2 h), followed by
avidin-horseradish peroxidase (1:1000, Zymed Laboratories, South
San Francisco, CA) for 1 h at room temperature. The ELISPOT
was developed by adding 100 µL of 1.6 mmol/L
3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole in 0.1mol/L sodium acetate buffer containing
0.015% H2O2 (Kit AEC,
Sigma) to each well. After the wells were flushed with water, the
secreting cells were counted using a stereomicroscope; data were
expressed as the mean ± SEM of IgA- or anti-CT
IgAsecreting cells per 106 cells.
Detection of antibodies by ELISA
Nonspecific IgA and IgG levels, as well as anti-CT IgA and anti-CT IgG antibody titers, in the culture media and sera were measured by ELISA. Microtiter wells were coated with CT (10 mg/L), sheep anti-rat IgA or IgG (2.5 mg/L, The Binding Site) and incubated sequentially with 20 g/L bovine serum albumin, 75 µL of serially diluted serum or culture supernate, biotinylated goat anti-rat IgA or IgG (1:5000, Rockland Immunochemicals), avidin-horseradish peroxidase (1:1000, Zymed Laboratories) and reacted with o-phenylenediamine (Zymed Laboratories). Rats fed the vehicle alone were used as negative controls. Values for nonspecific Ig concentrations and antibody titers were calculated from the linear portions of IgA or IgG standard curves and expressed as mg Ig/L of serum or ng Ig/106 cells.
Statistical analysis
All results are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
Statistical analyses were performed using two-way ANOVA followed by
the Student-Newman-Keuls test (InStat software, version 2.01, GraphPad
Software, San Diego, CA). Differences were considered significant when
P
0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Consumption of kefir was 41.8 ± 1.3 mL/d in the young and
46.9 ± 1.3 mL/d in the old rats (Table 1
). When these data were normalized for body weight, the ratio was
similar in the two age groups [10 mL/(100g · d), P
> 0.05]. Although young rats gained 2% of initial body weight
and old rats lost 10% of initial body weight over the 28-d experiment,
these changes in weight were not significant over time. There was no
significant difference in the pattern of body weight change between the
control and kefir-fed rats within each age group (data not shown).
No diarrhea, loss of appetite or discomfort was observed during the
feeding trial.
|
Nonspecific total serum IgA titers did not differ between the
control and kefir-fed rats within each age group (Table 2
). The serum anti-CT IgA concentration was lower in old
kefir-fed rats compared with the age-matched controls (-40%,
P
0.01). This decline was reflected in the lower
anti-CT IgA/nonspecific IgA ratio in the old group. On the
contrary, feeding kefir to young rats enhanced the mucosal immune
response as evidenced by a significantly higher serum anti-CT IgA
titer compared with the respective controls (+86%, P
0.05). Interestingly, the nonspecific total serum IgG titers in
both young and old kefir-fed groups were much greater compared with
their respective controls (+125% and + 520%, respectively,
P
0.01) (Table 2)
. However, feeding kefir to young
and old rats decreased the systemic IgG response to CT; the anti-CT
IgG titers were significantly lower in both kefir-fed groups
compared with their age-matched cohorts (-80%, P
0.01).
|
IgA secretion by cultured lymphocytes was not affected by diet
because there were no differences between cells isolated from control
and kefir-fed rats in either age group (Table 3
). In old rats, the kefir-supplemented diet did not influence in
vitro anti-CT IgA secretion. However, anti-CT IgA antibody
secretion by intestinal LP cells isolated from kefir-fed old rats
was 25% greater than that by similar cells isolated from control old
rats (P = 0.55). In vitro antibody CT IgA secretion by
PP and intestinal LP cells from young kefir-fed rats was
180%
greater (P
0.05) than that measured in the control
rats and secretions by the SP of kefir-fed rats were
50%
(P
0.05) greater.
|
Although the differences in numbers of antibody-secreting
cells were not significant in most cases, kefir-fed young rats
yielded more anti-CT IgA antibody-secreting cells in the SP
(+15%, P = 0.38), MLN (+42%, P = 0.096), PP (+21%, P = 0.24) and LP (+22%,
P = 0.32) compared with their age-matched controls
(Table 4
). However, the number of anti-CT IgA secreting cells was lower in
the SP (-32%, P = 0.19), MLN (-55%, P
= 0.02), PP (-17%, P = 0.42) and LP (-23%,
P = 0.23) of kefir-fed old rats compared with their
controls.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Increased immunoglobulin secretion appears to be associated with a
higher number of antibody-secreting cells in the gut-associated
lymphoid tissues. Mice fed yogurt for up to 10 d exhibited a
marked infiltration of plasma cells and lymphocytes into the intestinal
mucosa (Perdigón et al. 1994
). After 7 d,
there was an increase in the number of IgA-secreting cells,
although the numbers of IgG- and IgM-secreting cells, as well as T
cells, were unaffected. Our results with kefir, together with data from
others studying different fermented milks, suggest that these probiotic
foods may have a common adjuvant effect on the mucosal immune system.
Our results suggest that kefir enhances the serum nonspecific total IgG titer in both young and old rats, whereas the nonspecific total IgA titer is similar in kefir-fed and control groups. On the contrary, the anti-CT IgA antibody titer is enhanced in kefir-fed young rats, whereas the IgG antibody titer is diminished. The serum anti-CT IgA titer most likely reflects circulating antibodies destined for mucosal sites. Our interpretation is supported by the observation that kefir increases anti-CT IgA secretion in cells isolated from the inductive and effector sites of the small intestine (PP and LP).
Cholera holotoxin stimulates both mucosal and systemic immunity and
serves as a strong adjuvant, i.e., it induces an intestinal secretory
IgA response to itself and to coadministered antigens, and it mediates
an IgA memory response (Elson and Dertzbaugh 1999
,
Snider 1995
). The decline in the serum anti-CT IgG
titer despite the increase in the nonspecific serum IgG titer in
kefir-fed rats, likely reflects the adjuvant effect of CT, i.e.,
enhancing systemic immune responses against antigens present in the
kefir. However, at the mucosal site, CT is recognized as a potent
antigen and kefir appears to function as an adjuvant. Other
investigators have reported that nonspecific serum IgG titers remain
unchanged in animals consuming fermented milk or yogurt (Portier et al. 1993
, Tejada-Simon et al. 1999
).
Although our results suggest that kefir does not enhance the intestinal
mucosal immune response to CT in old rats, there are several inherent
caveats in this study. First, the marked heterogeneity of responses
within the old-age groups diminishes the number of significant
differences detected within this age group, i.e., between kefir-fed
and control rats. Second, we examined only two ages, young adult and
old rats; as a result, we may have missed changes associated with
maturation. Such studies should be performed across the entire life
span of the animal model, rather than at the extremes. Third, the
absence of rats fed nonfermented milk precludes our eliminating an
effect attributable to milk alone. However, many other studies have
demonstrated specific effects due to fermented milk compared with diets
supplemented with nonfermented milk only (Furukawa et al.1991
, Perdigon at al. 1993
, Portier et al., 1993
, Tejada-Simon at al. 1999
,
Thoreux et al. 1998
). Our preliminary experiments
require further investigation with both a nonfermented milk control
group and a middle-aged group.
Our study suggests that kefir, like other fermented milk products, may
stimulate mucosal immunity, although the mechanism(s) has not been
resolved. The general consensus suggests that probiotic organisms must
be ingested continuously to realize their health benefits
(Fuller 1991
). Furthermore, viable probiotic organisms
may not be required to enhance the immune response. Improved lactose
digestion and the modulation of certain immune activities have been
reported with nonviable probiotic organisms (Sanders 2000
). Unfortunately, we have no information concerning the
survivability of the yeast and LAB strains present in the kefir grains
employed in this study.
Differences in the genus, species or strain of probiotic bacteria can
contribute to differences in traits such as stability, enzyme
expression, carbohydrate fermentation patterns, acid production,
colonizing ability and, perhaps most important, clinical efficacy. The
composition of kefir varies dramatically depending on a variety of
factors, including the source of the milk, its fat content and the
composition of the grains or starters. Kefir grains include LAB
(lactobacilli, lactocci, leuconostocs), yeasts, acetic acid bacteria
and possibly other microorganisms (Marshall and Cole 1985
). The predominant lactobacilli in kefir grains are
L. Paracasei subsp. paracasei, L.
acidophilus, L. delbrueckii subsp.
Bulgaricus, L. plantarum and L.
kefiranofaciens (Hallé et al. 1994
). These
strains account for 90% of the population in the grains, but only 20%
of the lactobacilli in the final fermented beverage. The remaining 80%
of these LAB consists of L. kefir. The predominant yeasts in
both the beverage and the kefir grains are Saccharomyces
cerevisiae, S. unisporus, Candida kefir and
Kluyveromyces marxianus marxianus (Hallé et al. 1994
). Although the complexity of the bacterial and yeast
populations in the kefir grains, as well as in the kefir milk,
precludes the identification of a specific probiotic agent responsible
for immunomodulation, one possible source of adjuvant activity may be
bacterial wall components.
Preservation of the normal intestinal flora, resistance to colonization
and the production of antibacterial substances are critical events in
the generation of a successful probiotic effect in the intestine.
Despite a lack of knowledge concerning the mechanism(s) whereby
probiotic organisms elicit their beneficial effects, the consumption of
yogurt and fermented milks has increased in recent years and reflects
perceived health benefits (Sanders 2000
). The results of
our study show that orally administered kefir enhances the specific
intestinal mucosal immune response against cholera holotoxin in young
adult, but not senescent rats. Subsequent investigations should address
the mechanisms responsible for the suspected health benefits of
probiotic foodstuffs, as well as the credibility and suitability of
such dietary supplements for enhancing the intestinal immune response
to vaccination in immunocompromised individuals.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
3 Abbreviations used: CT, cholera toxin; ELISPOT,
enzyme-linked immunospot; Ig, immunoglobulin; LAB, lactic acid
bacteria; LP, lamina propria; MLN, mesenteric lymph nodes; PP, Peyers
patches; SP, spleen. ![]()
Manuscript received October 19, 2000. Initial review completed October 27, 2000. Revision accepted December 4, 2000.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Arranz E., OMahony S., Barton J., Ferguson A. Immunosenescence and mucosal immunity: significant effects of old age on secretory IgA concentrations and intraepithelial/lymphocyte counts. Gut 1992;33:882-886
2. Cevikbas A., Yemni E., Ezzedenn F. W., Yardimici T. Antitumoural, antibacterial and antifungal activities of kefir and kefir grain. Phytother. Res. 1994;8:78-82
3. Czerkinsky C., Nilsson L. A., Nygren H., Ouchterlony , Ö. & Tarkowski A. A solid-phase enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay for enumeration of specific antibody-secreting cells. J. Immunol. Methods 1983;65:109-121[Medline]
4. De Simone C., Ciardi A., Grassi A., Lambert-Gardini S., Tzantzoglou S., Trinchieri V., Moretti S., Jirillo E. Effect of Bifidobacterium bifidum and Lactobacillus acidophilus on gut mucosa and peripheral blood B lymphocytes. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 1992;14:331-340[Medline]
5. De Simone C., Vesely R., Bianchi B. S., Jirillo E. The role of probiotics in modulation of the immune system in man and in animals. Int. J. Immunother. 1993;9:23-28
6. Ebersole J., Smith D., Taubman M. Secretory immune responses in ageing rats. I. Immunoglobulin levels. Immunology 1985;56:345-350
7. Elson C. O., Dertzbaugh M. T. Mucosal adjuvants. Ogra P. L. Mestecky J. Lamm M. E. Strober W. Bienenstock J. McGhee J. R. eds. Mucosal Immunology 1999:817-838 Academic Press San Diego, CA.
8.
Fuller R. Probiotics in human medicine. Gut 1991;32:439-442
9. Furukawa N., Matsuoka A., Takahashi T., Yamanaka Y. Effects of orally administered yogurt and kefir on tumor growth in mice. J. Jpn. Soc. Nutr. Food Sci. 1990;43:450-453
10. Furukawa N., Matsuoka A., Takahashi T., Yamanaka Y. Effects of fermented milk on the delayed-type hypersensitivity response and survival in mice bearing Meth-A. Anim. Sci. Technol. 1991;62:579-585
11. Hallé C., Leroi F., Dousset X., Pidoux M. Les kéfirs: des associations bactéries lactiques-levures. Bactéries Lactiques: Aspects Fondamentaux et Technologiques 1994:169-182 Lorica Uriage, France.
12. Halpern G. M., Vruwink K. G., Van de Water J., Keen C. L., Gershwin M. E. Influence of long-term yoghurt consumption in young adults. Int. J. Immunother. 1991;7:205-210
13. Isolauri E., Joensuu J., Suomalainen H., Luomala M., Vesikari T. Improved immunogenicity of oral D x RRV reassortant rotavirus vaccine by Lactobacillus casei GG. Vaccine 1995;13:310-312[Medline]
14. Isolauri E., Majamaa H., Arvola T., Rantala I., Virtanen E., Arvilommi H. Lactobacillus casei strain GG reverses increased intestinal permeability induced by cow milk in suckling rats. Gastroenterology 1993;105:1643-1650[Medline]
15. Jeandel C., Laurain M. C., Decottignies F. Infectious diarrhea in the aged. Rev. Prat. 1996;46:184-188[Medline]
16. Link-Amster H., Rochat F., Saudan K. Y., Mignot O., Aeschlimann J. M. Modulation of a specific humoral immune response and changes in intestinal flora mediated through fermented milk intake. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 1994;10:55-63[Medline]
17. Lycke N. A sensitive method for the detection of specific antibody production in different isotypes from single lamina propria plasma cells. Scand. J. Immunol. 1986;24:393-403[Medline]
18. Marshall V. M., Cole W. M. Methods for making kefir and fermented milks based on kefir. J. Dairy Res. 1985;52:451-456
19. Osada K., Nagira K., Teruya K., Tachibana H., Shirahata S., Murakami H. Enhancement of interferon-ß production with sphingomyelin from fermented milk. Biotherapy 1994;7:115-123
20. Owen R., L & Lew J. Gastrointestinal infections in the elderly. Surawicz C. Owen R.L. eds. Gastrointestinal and Hepatic Infections 1995:551-564 W. B. Saunders Philadelphia, PA.
21. Paganelli R., Scala E., Quinti I., Ansotegui I. Humoral immunity in aging. Aging 1994;6:143-150[Medline]
22. Perdigón G., Medici M., Bibas Bonet de Jorrat M. E., Valverde de Buduguer M., Pesce de Ruiz Holgado A. Immunomodulating effects of lactic acid bacteria on mucosal and tumoral immunity. Int. J. Immunother 1993;9:29-52
23. Perdigón G., Rachid M., De Budeguer M. V., Valdez J. C. Effect of yogurt feeding on the small and large intestine associated lymphoid cells in mice. J. Dairy Res. 1994;61:553-562[Medline]
24. Popova P., Guencheva G., Davidkova G., Bogdanov A., Pacelli E., Opalchenova G., Kutzarova T., Koychev C. Stimulating effect of DEODAN (an oral preparation from Lactobacillus bulgaricus "LB51") on monocytes/macrophages and host resistance to experimental infections. Int. J. Immunopharmacol. 1993;15:25-37[Medline]
25. Portier A., Boyaka N. P., Bougoudogo F., Dubarry M., Huneau J. F., Tome D., Dodin A., Coste M. Fermented milks and increased antibody responses against cholera in mice. Int. J. Immunother. 1993;9:217-224
26. Sanders M. E. Effect of consumption of lactic acid cultures on human health. Kinsella J.E. eds. Advances in Food and Nutrition Research 1993:67-130 Academic Press San Diego, CA.
27. Sanders M. E. Considerations for use of probiotic bacteria to modulate human health. J. Nutr. 2000;130:384S-390S
28. Schmucker D. L., Daniels C. K., Wang R. K., Smith K. Mucosal immune response to cholera toxin in ageing rats. I Antibody and antibody-containing cell response. Immunology 1988;64:691-695[Medline]
29. Schmucker D. L., Gilbert R., Jones A. L, Hradek G., Bazin H. Effect of aging on the hepatobiliary transport of dimeric immunoglobulin A in the male Fischer rat. Gastroenterology 1985;88:436-443[Medline]
30. Schmucker D., L & Owen R. L Aging and gastrointestinal mucosal immune response. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 1997;13:534-541
31. Smith D., Ebersole J., Taubman M. Local and systemic immune response in aged hamsters. Immunology 1983;50:407-413[Medline]
32. Snider D. P. The mucosal adjuvant activities of ADP-ribosylating bacterial enterotoxins. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 1995;15:317-348[Medline]
33. Takahashi T., Nakagawa E., Nara T., Yajima T., Kuwata T. Effects of orally ingested Bifidobacterium longum on the mucosal IgA response of mice to dietary antigens. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1998;62:10-15[Medline]
34. Taylor L. D., Daniels C., K & Schmucker D. L Ageing compromises gastrointestinal mucosal immune response in the rhesus monkey. Immunology 1992;75:614-618[Medline]
35. Tejada-Simon M. V., Lee J. H., Ustunol Z., Pestka J. J. Ingestion of yogurt containing Lactobacillus acidophilus and Bifidobacterium to potentiate immunoglobulin A responses to cholera toxin in mice. J. Dairy Sci. 1999;82:649-660[Abstract]
36. Thoreux K., Bouley C., Balas D., Senegas-Balas F. Diet supplemented with yogurt or milk fermented by Lactobacillus casei DN-114 001 stimulates growth and brush border activities of mouse small intestine. Digestion 1998;59:349-359[Medline]
37. Van de Water J., Keen C. L., Gershwin M. E. The influence of chronic yogurt consumption on immunity. J. Nutr. 1999;129:1492S-1155S
38. Zacconi C., Parisi M. G., Sarra P. G., Dallavalle P., Bottazzi V. Competitive exclusion of Salmonella kedougou in kefir fed chicks. Microbiol. Alim. Nutr. 1995;12:387-390
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||