Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milner, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milner, J. A.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2001;131:1027S-1031S.)
© 2001 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Supplement: Recent Advances on the Nutritional Effects Associated with the Use of Garlic as a Supplement

A Historical Perspective on Garlic and Cancer1

J. A. Milner

Nutrition Department, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802

ABSTRACT

Epidemiological and laboratory studies provide insight into the anticarcinogenic potential of garlic and its constituent compounds. Both water- and lipid-soluble allyl sulfur compounds are effective in blocking a myriad of chemically induced tumors. Part of the protection from these compounds probably relates to a block in nitrosamine formation and metabolism. However, blockage in the initiation and promotion phases of the carcinogenicity of various compounds, including polycyclic hydrocarbons, provide evidence that garlic and its constituents can alter several phase I and II enzymes. Their ability to block experimentally induced tumors in a variety of sites including skin, mammary and colon, suggests a general mechanism of action. Changes in DNA repair and in immunocompetence may also account for some of this protection. Some, but not all, allyl sulfur compounds can also effectively retard tumor proliferation and induce apoptosis. Changes in cellular thiol and phosphorylation stains may account for some of these antitumorigenic properties. The anticarcinogenic potential of garlic can be influenced by several dietary components including specific fatty acids, selenium, and vitamin A. Since garlic and its constituents can suppress carcinogen formation, carcinogen bioactivation, and tumor proliferation it is imperative that biomarkers be established to identify which individuals might benefit most and what intakes can occur with ill consequences..


KEY WORDS: • garlic • allyl sulfur • carcinogenesis • lipid • tumorigenesis

Garlic has long been revered for its medicinal properties as evidenced by ancient writings from Egypt, Greece, China and India extolling its merits. This reverence has escalated in recent years as a result of the emergence of data indicating that garlic may influence the risk of heart disease and cancer (Fenwick and Hanley 1985Citation , Milner 1996 and 1999Citation Citation , Orekhov and Grunwald 1997Citation , Yoshida et al. 1999Citation ). Although significant limitations exist in defining the precise role that garlic has in the cancer process, the likelihood of its significance as a protective agent is supported by both epidemiologic and preclinical studies. Epidemiologic findings about garlic as an anticancer dietary component are presented by Fleischauer and Arab (2001)Citation in this issue. Preclinical studies with cancer models appear to provide some of the most compelling evidence that garlic and related sulfur constituents can suppress cancer risk and alter the biological behavior of tumors.

Experimentally, garlic and its associated sulfur components are reported to suppress tumor incidence in breast, colon, skin, uterine, esophagus and lung cancers (Amagase and Milner 1993Citation , Hussain et al. 1990Citation , Ip et al. 1992Citation , Liu et al. 1992Citation , Shukla et al. 1999Citation , Song and Milner 1999Citation , Sumiyoshi and Wargovich 1990Citation , Wargovich et al. 1988Citation ). This protection may arise from several mechanisms including the following: blockage of N-nitroso compound (NOC)2 formation, suppression in the bioactivation of several carcinogens, enhanced DNA repair, reduced cell proliferation and/or induction of apoptosis. It is likely that several of these cellular events are occurring simultaneously and account for the widespread protection that is observed experimentally after garlic supplementation. Nevertheless, it is also apparent that the allyl sulfur compounds in garlic do not function in isolation but are influenced by several components of the diet. Thus, it is not surprising that inconsistencies exist in the literature about the true physiologic importance of garlic as a modifier of the cancer process. This review will focus on evidence that garlic is anticarcinogenic and antitumorigenic and identify some dietary components that should be considered as important variables when assessing the true anticancer potential of garlic.

Nitrosamine formation and bioactivation

Considerable information points to the ability of garlic to suppress the formation of NOC (Atanasova-Goranova et al. 1997Citation , Dion et al. 1997Citation , Kolb et al. 1997Citation , Shenoy and Choughuley 1992Citation ). NOC are suspect carcinogens in a variety of biological systems and may be a critical environmental factor influencing cancer risk in humans (Brown 1999Citation ; Ferguson 1999Citation ). Exposure to these potential carcinogens can occur through either ingestion or inhalation of preformed nitrosamines or by the ingestion of their precursors (Lijinsky 1999Citation ). A reduction in nitrosamines may occur as a result of the enhanced formation of nitrosothiols after ingestion of garlic or other allium foods. Williams (1983)Citation demonstrated that several sulfur compounds fostered nitrosothiols formation, thereby minimizing the amount of nitrite for NOC synthesis. Studies by Dion et al. (1997)Citation provided evidence that several allium foods contained compounds that were effective in blocking nitrosamine formation. Their studies also documented that not all allyl sulfur compounds were effective in retarding the formation of NOC. S-Allyl cysteine (SAC) and its non-allyl analog S-propyl cysteine retarded NOC formation, but diallyl disulfide (DADS), dipropyl disulfide and diallyl sulfide were ineffective. These data provide evidence of the critical role that the cysteine residue has in retarding NOC formation (Dion et al. 1997Citation ). Because the content of allyl sulfur can vary among preparations, it is likely that not all garlic sources will be equally protective against nitrosamine formation. It should also be pointed out that some of the protection against carcinogenic nitrosamine exposure may occur secondarily to a depression in microbes within the gastrointestinal tract. Mounting evidence indicates that several microorganisms can enhance the synthesis of nitrosoamines. Dion et al. (1997)Citation and many others have provided evidence that several oil-soluble allyl sulfur compounds are effective antimicrobial agents. Thus, the ability of garlic to depress NOC may arise from a number of physiologic events.

Some of the most convincing evidence that garlic is able to reduce nitrosamine formation in humans comes from studies by Mei et al. (1989)Citation . They reported that providing 5 g garlic/d completely blocked the enhanced urinary excretion of nitrosoproline arising from the ingestion of supplemental nitrate and proline. The significance of this observation rests on the importance of nitrosoproline excretion as a predictor of the overall capacity for nitrosamine synthesis (Ohshima and Bartsch 1999Citation ). Evidence for the importance of this reduction in cancer comes from the ability of garlic to block DNA adducts arising from precursors to a nitrosamine known to induce liver cancer (Lin et al. 1994Citation ).

The anticancer benefits attributed to garlic are also consistent with its ability to suppress carcinogen bioactivation. Several publications point to the effectiveness of garlic in blocking DNA aklylation, a primary step in nitrosamine carcinogenesis (Haber-Mignard et al. 1996Citation , Hong et al. 1992Citation , Lin et al. 1994Citation ). Consistent with this reduction in bioactivation, Dion et al. (1997)Citation found that both water-soluble SAC and lipid-soluble DADS retarded the mutagenicity of nitrosomorpholine in Salmonella typhimurium TA100. Similarly, reduced mutagenicity after aqueous garlic extract exposure has been reported to occur during exposures to ionizing radiation, or treatment with peroxides, adriamycin and N-methyl-N'-nitro-nitrosoguanidine (Knasmuller et al. 1989Citation ).

A block in nitrosamine bioactivation may reflect changes in several enzymes. Cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) appears to be one that is particularly vulnerable to the effects of allyl sulfur compounds (Chen et al. 1994Citation , Jeong and Lee 1998Citation , Yang 2001Citation ). An autocatalytic destruction of CYP2E1 has been demonstrated and may account for the chemoprotective effects of diallyl sulfide, and possibly other allyl sulfur compounds against some chemical carcinogens (Jin and Baillie 1997Citation ). Understanding the variation in the content and overall activity of P450 2E1 would assist in determining who might benefit most from an intervention strategy using garlic or isolated components.

Other carcinogens are also influenced

Allyl sulfur compounds arising from garlic have also been found to effectively block the bioactivation and carcinogenicity of several non-nitrosamines (Table 1Citation ). The diverse array of compounds and target tissues involved suggests either that garlic or associated constituents have multiple mechanisms of action or, more logically, influence a fundamental step in the overall cancer process. Metabolic activation is a necessary event for many of these carcinogens used in animal studies, and possibly for environmental exposures faced by humans. Thus, phase I and II enzymes involved in carcinogen bioactivation and removal may be key in explaining the response to garlic and allyl sulfur compounds. However, few studies have noted significant changes in cytochrome P450 1A1, 1A2, 2B1, or 3A4 activities after supplementation with garlic or related sulfur compounds (Manson et al. 1997Citation , Pan et al. 1993, Wang et al. 1999Citation ). Therefore, other enzymes involved in the bioactivation or removal of carcinogenic metabolites may play a role. Singh et al. (1998)Citation provided evidence that the efficacy of various organosulfides to suppress benzo(a)pyrene tumorigenesis correlated with their ability to suppress NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase, an enzyme involved with the removal of quinones associated with this carcinogen. Depressed carcinogen bioactivation because of reduction in cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase activity may also account for some of the lower incidence of tumors after treatment with some carcinogens (Hughes et al. 1989Citation , Joseph et al. 1994Citation , Liu et al. 1995Citation , McGrath and Milner 1999Citation , Rioux and Castonguay 1998Citation , Roy and Kulkarni 1999Citation ). Enhanced glutathione availability and an elevation in the activity of specific glutathione-S-transferase (GST), both factors involved in phase II detoxification, may also be significant in the protection provided by garlic and associated allyl sulfur components. Ingestion of garlic by rats increases the activity of GST in both liver and mammary tissue (Hatono et al. 1996Citation , Manson et al. 1997Citation , Singh and Singh 1997Citation ). It should be noted that not all GST isozymes are influenced equally. Hu et al. (1997)Citation provided evidence that the induction of GST pi may be particularly important in the anticarcinogenic properties associated with garlic and allyl sulfur components.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Cancer causing agents known to be influenced by garlic and/or associated allyl sulfur compounds1

 
Garlic has also been found to reduce the incidence of tumors resulting from the treatment with methylnitrosurea (MNU), a known direct-acting carcinogen (Lin et al. 1994Citation ). Water-soluble SAC (57 µmol/kg diet) and lipid-soluble DADS cause a comparable reduction in MNU-induced O6-methylguanine adducts bound to mammary cell DNA (Schaffer et al. 1996Citation ). Most recently, SAC was not found to provide protection against MNU-induced mammary tumors (Cohen et al. 1999Citation ). The reason for this discrepancy is unknown but may relate to the quantity of lipid in the diet or the quantity of carcinogen provided. If there truly are effects of DADS and SAC on MNU carcinogenesis, the mechanism(s) by which it brings about this effect are likely related to changes in DNA repair and/or cell signaling because this is a direct-acting carcinogen. It is possible that garlic could influence mammary gland terminal end bud formation and/or cause a change in rates of DNA repair. Clearly, additional information is required to determine whether garlic and its related compounds can alter the carcinogenicity of direct-acting carcinogens.

Rarely has a comparison of water- and oil-soluble compounds been undertaken. Nevertheless, available evidence suggests that major differences are not likely (Amagase and Milner 1993Citation , Balasenthil et al. 1999Citation , Liu et al. 1992Citation , Schaffer et al. 1996 and 1997Citation Citation , Singh and Shukla 1998Citation ). Although subtle differences among garlic preparations can and do occur, quantity rather than source appears to be the key factor influencing the degree of protection (Liu et al. 1992Citation ). Variations that surface among preparations likely relate to the content and effectiveness of specific sulfur compounds. More attention must be given to defining the actual active allyl sulfur compounds that bring about the anticancer properties. Clearly, the number of sulfur atoms on the molecule can influence the degree of protection, with diallyl trisulfide > diallyl disulfide > diallyl sulfide (Sakamoto et al. 1997Citation , Sundaram and Milner 1995Citation , Tsai et al. 1996Citation ). Similarly, the presence of the allyl group generally enhances protection over that provided by the propyl moiety (Hu et al. 1997Citation , Sundaram and Milner 1995Citation ). Overall, bioavailability will be important in determining the overall efficacy of various allyl sulfur compounds as anticancer agents.

Antiproliferative effects of garlic

Cancer is best characterized as uncontrolled proliferating cells. Several lines of evidence point to allyl sulfur compounds as potentially important antitumorigenic agents (Dirsch et al. 1998Citation , Knowles and Milner 1998Citation , Lea and Ayyala 1997Citation , Lea et al. 1999Citation , Li et al. 1995Citation , Pinto et al. 1997Citation , Sakamoto et al. 1997Citation , Scharfenberg et al. 1990 and 1994Citation Citation , Sigounas et al. 1997Citation , Sundaram and Milner 1993 and 1996Citation Citation , Takeyama et al. 1993Citation , Welch et al. 1992Citation ). Table 2Citation provides a list of some of the allyl sulfur compounds that have been found to alter significantly the proliferation of neoplastic cells. The ability of these compounds to depress tumor cells of different origin suggests that a critical stage in the cancer process is being modified. Active cellular proliferation appears to be a factor in enhancing the growth inhibitory affects ascribed to allyl sulfides (Sigounas et al. 1997Citation ). Scharfenberg et al. (1990)Citation found that A549 lung and BJA-B Burkitt lymphoma cells were more than twice as sensitive to the antiproliferative effects of DATS and ajoene than were nonneoplastic MRC-5 lung and FS4/BHK fibroblasts cells. In vivo studies provide evidence that the observations made in vitro have physiologic significance (Riggs et al. 1997Citation , Singh et al. 1996Citation , Sundaram and Milner 1996Citation , Weisberger and Pensky 1958Citation ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Allyl sulfides with antineoplastic properties

 
Studies from Sundaram and Milner (1996)Citation and Pinto et al. (1997)Citation provide evidence that the allyl group is instrumental in bringing about the growth depression. However, not all allyl sulfides are equal in their ability to reduce tumor proliferation (Pinto et al. 1997Citation , Sundaram and Milner 1993Citation ). Studies by Sundaram and Milner 1993Citation demonstrated that diallyl sulfide, DADS and diallyl trisulfide (DATS) were far more effective in retarding the growth of neoplasms than were water-soluble allyl sulfur compounds such as SAC. Shifts in the cell cycle have been found to correlate with the depression in growth of neoplasms treated with DADS (Knowles and Milner 1998Citation ).

The loss of cancer progression after treatment with allyl sulfur compounds likely relates to several epigenetic changes. Two extensively examined mechanisms for epigenetic gene regulation are patterns of DNA methylation and histone acetylations/deacetylations. Several studies indicate that DNA hypermethylation is an important factor involved in the activity of key regulatory genes. DNA methylation and histone acetylation can be modified by enhanced intake of garlic and/or related allyl sulfur compounds. Ludeke et al. (1992)Citation reported that DAS inhibited the formation of O6-methyldeoxyguanosine in esophagus (26%), nasal mucosa (51%), trachea (68%) and lung (78%) that arose after treatment with N-nitrosomethylbenzylamine. Similarly, studies by Lin et al. (1994)Citation and Schaffer et al. (1996)Citation provide evidence that DADS, SAC and deodorized garlic are effective in retarding the DNA methylation caused by NMU. Lea et al. (1999)Citation reported that at least part of the ability of DADS to induce differentiation in DS19 mouse erythroleukemic cells might relate to its ability to increase histone acetylation. Diallyl disulfide caused a marked increase in the acetylation of H4 and H3 histones in DS19 and K562 human leukemic cells, consistent with other studies showing that the disulfide was more effective that the monosulfide. Similar results were also obtained with rat hepatoma and human breast cancer cells. Allyl mercaptan was a more potent inhibitor of histone deacetylase than diallyl disulfide. Interestingly, DADS has been also been reported to inhibit the growth of H-ras oncogene–transformed tumors in nude mice (Singh et al. 1996Citation ). This inhibition correlated with the inhibition of p21H-ras membrane association in the tumor tissue. As the molecular targets for allyl sulfur compounds become more evident, it will become easier to determine who might benefit most from their exaggerated intake.

Diet as a modifier

The effect of garlic and allyl sulfur components on the cancer process cannot be considered in isolation; rather, it is clearly dependent on several environmental and dietary variables. Among the dietary factors are total fat, selenium, methionine and vitamin A (Amagase et al. 1996Citation , Ip et al. 1996Citation , Schaffer and Milner 1997Citation ). Amagase et al. (1996)Citation and Ip et al. (1996)Citation reported that selenium supplied either as a component of the diet or as a constituent of the garlic supplement enhanced the protection against 7,12 dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA) mammary carcinogenesis over that provided by garlic alone. Suppression in carcinogen bioactivation, as indicated by a reduction in DNA adducts, may account in part for this combined benefit of garlic and selenium (Schaffer et al. 1997Citation ). However, both selenium and allyl sulfur compounds alter cell proliferation and induce apoptosis (Ganther 1999Citation , Knowles and Milner 1998Citation , Sundaram and Milner 1996Citation )

Dietary fatty acid supply can also dramatically influence the bioactivation of DMBA to metabolites capable of binding to rat mammary cell DNA. A significant portion of the enhancement in mammary DNA adducts caused by increasing dietary corn oil consumption can be attributed to linoleic acid intake (Schaffer and Milner 1996Citation ). The ability of selected fatty acids to alter DMBA bioactivation may provide clues to a plausible mechanism by which garlic and its allyl sulfur compounds retard chemically induced tumors. As indicated previously, it does not appear that changes in cytochrome P450 enzymes account for the protection provided by supplemental garlic, except for the autocatalysis of CYP2E1. During the past decade Smith et al. (1991)Citation found that prostaglandin H synthase could metabolize the bay region diol of benzo(a)pyrene to electrophilic diol epoxides that would bind to DNA. Most recently, our laboratory has reported that DMBA bioactivation appears to depend on cyclooxygenase activity (Schaffer and Milner 1997Citation ) and lipoxygenase activity (McGarth and Milner 1999Citation ). This evidence is consistent with studies by Ali (1995)Citation that garlic could inhibit cyclooxygenase activity. Studies by McGrath and Milner (1999)Citation provided evidence that both water- and lipid-soluble allyl sulfur compounds could retard the ability of cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase to bioactivate DMBA. Evidence already existed that lipoxygenase was involved in the bioactivation of several carcinogens (Rioux and Castonguay 1998Citation , Roy and Kulkarni 1999Citation ), including benz(a)pyrene (Hughes et al. 1989Citation , Joseph et al. 1994Citation ), a carcinogen similar to DMBA. Interestingly, the activation caused by lipoxygenase was ~10 times greater than that caused by cyclooxygenase. Although limited, there are some data indicating that garlic and associated sulfur components can inhibit lipoxygenase activity (Belman et al. 1989Citation ). Finally, evidence for the involvement of lipoxygenase in the bioactivation of DMBA comes the data of Song (1999)Citation who reported that feeding the known lipoxygenase inhibitor, nordihydroguaiaretic acid, was accompanied by a marked reduction in DMBA-induced DNA adducts in rat mammary tissue. Collectively, these studies pose interesting questions about the role of both cyclooxygenase and lipoxygenase not only in forming prostaglandins, and therefore modulating tumor cell proliferation and immunocompetence, but also from their involvement in the bioactivation of carcinogens. Clearly, additional attention is warranted to clarify what role, if any, these enzymes have in determining the biological response to dietary garlic.

FOOTNOTES

1 Presented at the conference "Recent Advances on the Nutritional Benefits Accompanying the Use of Garlic as a Supplement" held November 15–17, 1998 in Newport Beach, CA. The conference was supported by educational grants from Pennsylvania State University, Wakunaga of America, Ltd. and the National Cancer Institute. The proceedings of this conference are published as a supplement to The Journal of Nutrition. Guest editors: John Milner, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA and Richard Rivlin, Weill Medical College of Cornell University and Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY. Back

2 Abbreviations used: CYP2E1, cytochrome P450 2E1; DADS, diallyl disulfide; DATS, diallyl trisulfide; DMBA, dimethylbenz[a]anthracene; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; MNU, methylnitrosurea; NOC, N-nitroso compounds; SAC, S-allyl cysteine. Back

REFERENCES

1. Ali M. Mechanism by which garlic (Allium sativum) inhibits cyclooxygenase activity. Effect of raw versus boiled garlic extract on the synthesis of prostanoids. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 1995;53:397-400[Medline]

2. Amagase H., Milner J. A. Impact of various sources of garlic and their constituents on 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene binding to mammary cell DNA. Carcinogenesis 1993;14:1627-1631[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Amagase H., Schaffer E. M., Milner J. A. Dietary components modify garlic’s ability to suppress 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene–induced mammary DNA adducts. J. Nutr. 1996;126:817-824

4. Atanasova-Goranova V. K., Dimova P. I., Pevicharova G. T. Effect of food products on endogenous generation of N-nitrosamines in rats. Br. J. Nutr. 1997;78:335-345[Medline]

5. Balasenthil S., Arivazhagan S., Ramachandran C. R., Nagini S. Effects of garlic on 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced hamster buccal pouch carcinogenesis. Cancer Detect. Prev. 1999;23:534-538[Medline]

6. Belman S., Solomon J., Segal A., Block E., Barany G. Inhibition of soybean lipoxygenase and mouse skin tumor promotion by onion and garlic components. J. Biochem. Toxicol. 1989;4:151-160[Medline]

7. Brown J. L. N-Nitrosamines. Occup. Med. 1999;14:839-848

8. Chen L., Lee M., Hong J. Y., Huang W., Wang E., Yang C. S. Relationship between cytochrome P450 2E1 and acetone catabolism in rats as studied with diallyl sulfide as an inhibitor. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1994;48:2199-2205[Medline]

9. Cohen L. A., Zhao Z., Pittman B., Lubet R. S-Allylcysteine, a garlic constituent, fails to inhibit N-methylnitrosourea-induced rat mammary tumorigenesis. Nutr. Cancer 1999;35:58-63[Medline]

10. Dion M. E., Agler M., Milner J. A. S-Allyl cysteine inhibits nitrosomorpholine formation and bioactivation. Nutr. Cancer 1997;28:1-6[Medline]

11. Dirsch V. M., Gerbes A. L., Vollmar A. M. Ajoene, a compound of garlic, induces apoptosis in human promyeloleukemic cells, accompanied by generation of reactive oxygen species and activation of nuclear factor kappaB. Mol. Pharmacol. 1998;53:402-407[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Fenwick G. R., Hanley A. B. The genus Allium—Part 3. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1985;23:1-73[Medline]

13. Ferguson L. R. Natural and man-made mutagens and carcinogens in the human diet. Mutat. Res. 1999;443:1-10[Medline]

14. Fleishchauer A. T., Arab L. Garlic and cancer: a critical review of the epidemiologic literature. J. Nutr. 2001;131:1032S-1040S[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Ganther H. E. Selenium metabolism, selenoproteins and mechanisms of cancer prevention: complexities with thioredoxin reductase. Carcinogenesis 1999;20:1657-1666[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Haber-Mignard D., Suschetet M., Berges R., Astorg P., Siess M. H. Inhibition of aflatoxin B1- and N-nitrosodiethylamine-induced liver preneoplastic foci in rats fed naturally occurring allyl sulfides. Nutr. Cancer 1996;25:61-70[Medline]

17. Hatono S., Jimenez A., Wargovich M. J. Chemopreventive effect of S-allylcysteine and its relationship to the detoxification enzyme glutathione S-transferase. Carcinogenesis 1996;17:1041-1044[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Hong J. Y., Wang Z. Y., Smith T. J., Zhou S., Shi S., Pan J., Yang C. S. Inhibitory effects of diallyl sulfide on the metabolism and tumorigenicity of the tobacco-specific carcinogen 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) in A/J mouse lung. Carcinogenesis 1992;13:901-904[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Hu X., Benson P. J., Srivastava S. K., Xia H., Bleicher R. J., Zaren H. A., Awasthi S., Awasthi Y. C., Singh S. V. Induction of glutathione S-transferase pi as a bioassay for the evaluation of potency of inhibitors of benzo(a)pyrene-induced cancer in a murine model. Int. J. Cancer 1997;73:897-902[Medline]

20. Hughes M. F., Chamulitrat W., Mason R. P., Eling T. E. Epoxidation of 7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo[a]pyrene via a hydroperoxide-dependent mechanism catalyzed by lipoxygenases. Carcinogenesis 1989;10:2075-2080[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Hussain S. P., Jannu L. N., Rao A. R. Chemopreventive action of garlic on methylcholanthrene-induced carcinogenesis in the uterine cervix of mice. Cancer Lett 1990;49:175-180[Medline]

22. Ip C., Lisk D. J., Stoewsand G. S. Mammary cancer prevention by regular garlic and selenium-enriched garlic. Nutr. Cancer 1992;7:279-286

23. Ip C., Lisk D. J., Thompson H. J. Selenium-enriched garlic inhibits the early stage but not the late stage of mammary carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 1996;17:1979-1982[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Jeong H. G., Lee Y. W. Protective effects of diallyl sulfide on N-nitrosodimethylamine-induced immunosuppression in mice. Cancer Lett 1998;134:73-79[Medline]

25. Jin L., Baillie T. A. Metabolism of the chemoprotective agent diallyl sulfide to glutathione conjugates in rats. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1997;10:318-327[Medline]

26. Joseph P., Srinivasan S. N., Byczkowski J. Z., Kulkarni A. P. Bioactivation of benzo(a)pyrene-7,8-dihydrodiol catalyzed by lipoxygenase purified from human term placenta and conceptual tissues. Reprod. Toxicol. 1994;8:307-313[Medline]

27. Knasmuller S., de Martin R., Domjan G., Szakmary A. Studies on the antimutagenic activities of garlic extract. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 1989;13:357-365[Medline]

28. Knowles L. M., Milner J. A. Depressed p34cdc2 kinase activity and G2/M phase arrest induced by diallyl disulfide in HCT-15 cells. Nutr. Cancer 1998;30:169-174[Medline]

29. Kolb E., Haug M., Janzowski C., Vetter A., Eisenbrand G. Potential nitrosamine formation and its prevention during biological denitrification of red beet juice. Food Chem. Toxicol. 1997;35:219-224[Medline]

30. Lea M. A., Ayyala U. M. Differentiating and growth inhibitory effects of diallyl disulfide on cancer cells. Int. J. Oncol. 1997;11:181-185

31. Lea M. A., Randolph V. M., Patel M. Increased acetylation of histones induced by diallyl disulfide and structurally related molecules. Int. J. Oncol. 1999;15:347-352[Medline]

32. Li G., Qiao C. H., Lin R. I., Pinto J., Osborne M. P., Tiwari R. K. Anti-proliferative effects of garlic constituents in cultured human breast cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 1995;2:787-791

33. Lijinsky W. N-Nitroso compounds in the diet. Mutat. Res. 1999;443:129-138[Medline]

34. Lin X.-Y., Liu J. Z., Milner J. A. Dietary garlic suppresses DNA adducts caused by N-nitroso compounds. Carcinogenesis 1994;15:349-352[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Liu J. Z., Lin R. I., Milner J. A. Inhibition of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)-anthracene induced mammary tumors and DNA adducts by garlic powder. Carcinogenesis 1992;13:1847-1851[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Liu Y., Levy G. N., Weber W. W. Activation of 2-aminofluorene by prostaglandin endoperoxide H synthase-2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995;215:346-354[Medline]

37. Ludeke B. I., Domine F., Ohgaki H., Kleihues P. Modulation of N-nitrosomethylbenzylamine bioactivation by diallyl sulfide in vivo. Carcinogenesis 1992;13:2467-2470[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Manson M. M., Ball H. W., Barrett M. C., Clark H. L., Judah D. J., Williamson G., Neal G. E. Mechanism of action of dietary chemoprotective agents in rat liver: induction of phase I and II drug metabolizing enzymes and aflatoxin B1 metabolism. Carcinogenesis 1997;18:1729-1738[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. McGrath B. C., Milner J. A. Diallyl disulfide, S-allyl sulfide and conjugated linoleic acid retard 12/15-lipoxygenase-mediated bioactivation of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA) in vitro. FASEB J 1999;13:A540(abs.)

40. Mei X., Lin X., Liu J, Lin X. Y., Song P. J., Hu J. F., Liang X. J. The blocking effect of garlic on the formation of N-nitrosoproline in humans. Acta Nutr. Sin. 1989;11:141-145

41. Milner J. A. Garlic: its anticarcinogenic and antitumorigenic properties. Nutr. Rev. 1996;54:S82-S86[Medline]

42. Milner J. A. Functional foods and health promotion. J. Nutr. 1999;129(suppl.):1395S-1397S

43. Ohshima H., Bartsch H. Quantitative estimation of endogenous N-nitrosation in humans by monitoring N-nitrosoproline in urine. Methods Enzymol 1999;301:40-49[Medline]

44. Orekhov A. N., Grunwald J. Effects of garlic on atherosclerosis. Nutrition 1997;13:656-663[Medline]

45. Pan J., Hong J. Y., Li D., Schuetz E. G., Guzelian P. S., Huang W., Yang C. S. Regulation of cytochrome P450 2B1/2 genes by diallyl sulfone, disulfiram, and other organosulfur compounds in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1997;45:2323-2329

46. Pinto J. T., Qiao C., Xing J., Rivlin R. S., Protomastro M. L., Weissler M. L., Tao Y., Thaler H., Heston W. D. Effects of garlic thioallyl derivatives on growth, glutathione concentration, and polyamine formation of human prostate carcinoma cells in culture. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997;66:398-405[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Riggs D. R., DeHaven J. I., Lamm D. L. Allium sativum (garlic) treatment for murine transitional cell carcinoma. Cancer 1997;79:1987-1994[Medline]

48. Rioux N., Castonguay A. Inhibitors of lipoxygenase: a new class of cancer chemopreventive agents. Carcinogenesis 1998;19:1393-1400[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Roy P., Kulkarni A. P. Co-oxidation of acrylonitrile by soybean lipoxygenase and partially purified human lung lipoxygenase. Xenobiotica 1999;29:511-531[Medline]

50. Sakamoto K., Lawson L. D., Milner J. Allyl sulfides from garlic suppress the in vitro proliferation of human A549 lung tumor cells. Nutr. Cancer 1997;29:152-156[Medline]

51. Schaffer E. M., Liu J. Z., Green J., Dangler C. A., Milner J. A. Garlic and associated allyl sulfur components inhibit N-methyl-N-nitrosourea induced rat mammary carcinogenesis. Cancer Lett 1996;102:199-204[Medline]

52. Schaffer E. M., Liu J. Z., Milner J. A. Garlic powder and allyl sulfur compounds enhance the ability of dietary selenite to inhibit 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced mammary DNA adducts. Nutr. Cancer 1997;27:162-168[Medline]

53. Schaffer E. M., Milner J. A. Impact of dietary fatty acids on 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced mammary DNA adducts. Cancer Lett 1996;106:177-183[Medline]

54. Schaffer E. M., Milner J. A. Cyclooxygenase-mediated formation of 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene (DMBA)-induced mammary DNA adducts. FASEB J 1997;11:A440(abs.)

55. Scharfenberg K., Ryll T., Wagner R., Wagner K. G. Injuries to cultivated BJA-B cells by ajoene, a garlic-derived natural compound: cell viability, glutathione metabolism, and pools of acidic amino acids. J. Cell Physiol. 1994;158:55-60[Medline]

56. Scharfenberg K., Wagner R., Wagner K. G. The cytotoxic effect of ajoene, a natural product from garlic, investigated with different cell lines. Cancer Lett 1990;53:103-108[Medline]

57. Shenoy N. R., Choughuley A. S. Inhibitory effect of diet related sulphydryl compounds on the formation of carcinogenic nitrosamines. Cancer Lett 1992;65:227-232[Medline]

58. Shukla Y., Singh A., Srivastava B. Inhibition of carcinogen-induced activity of gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase by certain dietary constituents in mouse skin. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 1999;12:110-115[Medline]

59. Sigounas G., Hooker J., Anagnostou A., Steiner M. S-Allylmercaptocysteine inhibits cell proliferation and reduces the viability of erythroleukemia, breast, and prostate cancer cell lines. Nutr. Cancer 1997;27:186-191[Medline]

60. Singh A., Shukla Y. Antitumor activity of diallyl sulfide in two-stage mouse skin model of carcinogenesis. Biomed. Environ. Sci. 1998;11:258-263[Medline]

61. Singh A., Singh S. P. Modulatory potential of smokeless tobacco on the garlic, mace or black mustard-altered hepatic detoxication system enzymes, sulfhydryl content and lipid peroxidation in murine system. Cancer Lett 1997;118:109-114[Medline]

62. Singh S. V., Mohan R. R., Agarwal R., Benson P. J., Hu X., Rudy M. A., Xia H., Katoh A., Srivastava S. K., Mukhtar H., Gupta V., Zaren H. A. Novel anti-carcinogenic activity of an organosulfide from garlic: inhibition of H-ras oncogene transformed tumor growth in vivo by diallyl disulfide is associated with inhibition of p21H-ras processing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996;225:660-665[Medline]

63. Singh S. V., Pan S. S., Srivastava S. K., Xia H., Hu X., Zaren H. A., Orchard J. L. Differential induction of NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase by anti-carcinogenic organosulfides from garlic. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998;244:917-920[Medline]

64. Smith B. J., Curtis J. F., Eling T. E. Bioactivation of xenobiotics by prostaglandin H synthase. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 1991;79:245-264[Medline]

65. Song K. Factors Influencing Garlic’s Anticancer Properties. Master’s thesis 1999 The Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA.

66. Song K., Milner J. A. Heating garlic inhibits its ability to suppress 7, 12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced DNA adduct formation in rat mammary tissue. J. Nutr. 1999;129:657-661[Abstract/Free Full Text]

67. Sumiyoshi H., Wargovich M. J. Chemoprevention of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colon cancer in mice by natural occurring organosulfur compounds. Cancer Res 1990;50:5084-5087[Abstract/Free Full Text]

68. Sundaram S. G., Milner J. A. Impact of organosulfur compounds in garlic on canine mammary tumor cells in culture. Cancer Lett 1993;74:85-90[Medline]

69. Sundaram S. G., Milner J. A. Diallyl disulfide inhibits the proliferation of human tumor cells in culture. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995;1315:15-20

70. Sundaram S. G., Milner J. A. Diallyl disulfide induces apoptosis of human colon tumor cells. Carcinogenesis 1996;17:669-673[Abstract/Free Full Text]

71. Takeyama H., Hoon D. S., Saxton R. E., Morton D. L., Irie R. F. Growth inhibition and modulation of cell markers of melanoma by S-allyl cysteine. Oncology 1993;50:63-69[Medline]

72. Tsai S. J., Jenq S. N., Lee H. Naturally occurring diallyl disulfide inhibits the formation of carcinogenic heterocyclic aromatic amines in boiled pork juice. Mutagenesis 1996;11:235-240[Abstract/Free Full Text]

73. Wang B. H., Zuzel K. A., Rahman K., Billington D. Treatment with aged garlic extract protects against bromobenzene toxicity to precision cut rat liver slices. Toxicology 1999;132:215-225[Medline]

74. Wargovich M. J., Woods C., Eng V. W., Stephens L. C., Gray K. Chemoprevention of N-nitrosomethylbenzylamine-induced esophageal cancer in rats by the naturally occurring thioether, diallyl sulfide. Cancer Res 1988;48:6872-6875[Abstract/Free Full Text]

75. Weisberger A. S., Pensky J. Tumor inhibition by a sulfydryl-blocking agent related to an active principle of garlic (Allium sativum). Cancer Res 1958;18:1301-1308

76. Welch C., Wuarin L., Sidell N. Antiproliferative effect of the garlic compound S-allyl cysteine on human neuroblastoma cells in vitro. Cancer Lett 1992;63:211-219[Medline]

77. Williams D. H. S-Nitrosation and the reactions of S-nitroso compounds. Chem. Soc. Rev. 1983;15:171-196

78. Yang C. S. Mechanisms of inhibition of chemical toxicity and carcinogenesis by diallyl sulfide (DAS) and related compounds from garlic. J. Nutr. 2001;131:1041S-1045S[Abstract/Free Full Text]

79. Yoshida H., Katsuzaki H., Ohta R., Ishikawa K., Fukuda H., Fujino T., Suzuki A. An organosulfur compound isolated from oil-macerated garlic extract, and its antimicrobial effect. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1999;63:588-590[Medline]

80. You W. C., Blot W. J., Chang Y. S., Ershow A., Yang Z. T., An Q., Henderson B. E., Fraumeni J. F., Jr, Wang T. G. Allium vegetables and reduced risk of stomach cancer. J Natl. Cancer Inst. 1989;81:162-164[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
G. Filomeni, G. Rotilio, and M. R. Ciriolo
Molecular Transduction Mechanisms of the Redox Network Underlying the Antiproliferative Effects of Allyl Compounds from Garlic
J. Nutr., November 1, 2008; 138(11): 2053 - 2057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
C. D. Davis
Nutritional Interactions: Credentialing of Molecular Targets for Cancer Prevention
Experimental Biology and Medicine, February 1, 2007; 232(2): 176 - 183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
P. Zhang, M.-L. Noordine, C. Cherbuy, P. Vaugelade, J. M. Pascussi, P.-H. Duee, and M. Thomas
Different activation patterns of rat xenobiotic metabolism genes by two constituents of garlic
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2006; 27(10): 2090 - 2095.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
D. J. Greenblatt, R. A. Leigh-Pemberton, and L. L. von Moltke
In Vitro Interactions of Water-Soluble Garlic Components with Human Cytochromes P450
J. Nutr., March 1, 2006; 136(3): 806S - 809S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. J. Wargovich
Diallylsulfide and Allylmethylsulfide Are Uniquely Effective among Organosulfur Compounds in Inhibiting CYP2E1 Protein in Animal Models
J. Nutr., March 1, 2006; 136(3): 832S - 834S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. Hosono, T. Fukao, J. Ogihara, Y. Ito, H. Shiba, T. Seki, and T. Ariga
Diallyl Trisulfide Suppresses the Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis of Human Colon Cancer Cells through Oxidative Modification of {beta}-Tubulin
J. Biol. Chem., December 16, 2005; 280(50): 41487 - 41493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. A. Milner
Molecular Targets for Bioactive Food Components
J. Nutr., September 1, 2004; 134(9): 2492S - 2498S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
A. Svilaas, A. K. Sakhi, L. F. Andersen, T. Svilaas, E. C. Strom, D. R. Jacobs Jr., L. Ose, and R. Blomhoff
Intakes of Antioxidants in Coffee, Wine, and Vegetables Are Correlated with Plasma Carotenoids in Humans
J. Nutr., March 1, 2004; 134(3): 562 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
A. W. Hsing, A. P. Chokkalingam, Y.-T. Gao, M. P. Madigan, J. Deng, G. Gridley, and J. F. Fraumeni Jr.
Allium Vegetables and Risk of Prostate Cancer: A Population-Based Study
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 6, 2002; 94(21): 1648 - 1651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
C. Bose, J. Guo, L. Zimniak, S. K. Srivastava, S. P. Singh, P. Zimniak, and S. V. Singh
Critical role of allyl groups and disulfide chain in induction of Pi class glutathione transferase in mouse tissues in vivo by diallyl disulfide, a naturally occurring chemopreventive agent in garlic
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2002; 23(10): 1661 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
B. L. Halvorsen, K. Holte, M. C. W. Myhrstad, I. Barikmo, E. Hvattum, S. F. Remberg, A.-B. Wold, K. Haffner, H. Baugerod, L. F. Andersen, et al.
A Systematic Screening of Total Antioxidants in Dietary Plants
J. Nutr., March 1, 2002; 132(3): 461 - 471.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Milner, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Milner, J. A.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2001 by American Society for Nutrition