Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckhardt, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eckhardt, R. B.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2001;131:336S-339S.)
© 2001 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Supplement

Genetic Research and Nutritional Individuality1

Robert B. Eckhardt

Department of Kinesiology, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Genetic diversity in human...
 Some sources of genetic...
 Practical implications of...
 Comparative genomics
 REFERENCES
 
Recent genetic research builds on a base established over the last century by physicians and nutritional scientists, who introduced the concept of biochemical individuality and documented its significance for understanding a wide variety of problems in human health. Current comparative genomic investigations on a variety of organisms (Haemophilus influenzae, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans, Drosophila melanogaster, Homo sapiens) have established the existence of numerous orthologs (proteins in different organisms that show significant sequence similarities over 80% of their lengths), suggesting significant conservation of structure and probably some of function as well. At the same time, molecular comparisons among individuals within our own species show the existence of abundant molecular variants, many of which have been shown to have functional significance in nutritional and related metabolic contexts. The combination of biochemical individuality and known functional utilities of allelic variants should converge to create a situation in which nutritional optima can be specified as part of comprehensive lifestyle prescriptions tailored to the needs of each person.


KEY WORDS: • biochemical individuality • euphenics • genetic polymorphisms • genomics • molecular evolution


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Genetic diversity in human...
 Some sources of genetic...
 Practical implications of...
 Comparative genomics
 REFERENCES
 
Basic scientific discoveries in genomics hold great therapeutic promise, through direct modification of gene products or even of the underlying inherited allelic variants themselves. Early gene-based therapies included administration of exogenously produced gene products such as erythropoietin. Subsequent therapies may be based on transfer of the genes themselves, using plasmid vectors. A major objective will remain elucidation of regulatory mechanisms so that alleles at various loci can be expressed when desired, as with reactivation of the {gamma}-chain found in fetal hemoglobin as a replacement for the {beta}-chain variant that is protective against malaria in single dose but produces sickle cell anemia in double dose (Cerami and Washington 1974Citation ). Regulation of gene expression will lead eventually to control of tissue differentiation and regeneration of organs from somatic cells.

The hemoglobin variants are among many genes (Woolf 1996Citation ) initially characterized as defective, yet proving beneficial in certain environmental settings, undercutting a major thesis of the earlier eugenic movement (Eckhardt 1992Citation ). Genetic research also holds great promise for progress in another realm, i.e., euphenics. First conceived in contradistinction to eugenics, the euphenic approach to human health holds that knowledge of individual nucleotide sequences can be used to optimize elements of each person’s lifestyle. Strategies of this sort have been employed to a limited degree for several decades with the objective of maximizing the human potential of patients with rare genotypes, such as those underlying the expression of phenylketonuria (Scriver et al. 1996Citation ). It is now evident that significant improvements in human health can be made by nutritional scientists using knowledge about the human genome but emphasizing manipulation of environmental factors, particularly dietary elements.

As amply documented by other contributions to this symposium, some nutritionists already are working at the cutting edge of genetic research, in a conceptual framework that sees our expanding knowledge of human diversity as broadening the concept of normality rather than as documenting an expanded array of infirmities. In reading these papers, many other researchers in the field of nutrition science may come to realize that they are in the same metaphorical position as the character in Molière’s (1670) classic French farce "Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme" who exclaims "Good Heavens! For more than forty years I have been speaking prose without knowing it." Although not generally realized, the concept of nutritional (or biochemical) individuality has been virtually coeval with the evolution of genetics as a field of science, and contributions to conceptual progress have been made by nutritionists and physicians as well as by geneticists.

The primary purpose of this paper is to provide a general conceptual framework for the further integration of genetic and nutritional research, first by making explicit some of the important steps that already have been taken toward this end, and then by making suggestions about future prospects. Several key questions are posed here and answered in the course of the paper:

1. What is the extent of gene-based diversity in nutritional requirements?

2. Why do these levels of diversity exist?

3. What are the practical implications of nutritional individuality—both in general, and in the specific context of understanding the basis of biological variation in connection with obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease?


    Genetic diversity in human nutritional requirements
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Genetic diversity in human...
 Some sources of genetic...
 Practical implications of...
 Comparative genomics
 REFERENCES
 
It is widely known that the field of genetics was established by the pioneering research of the Augustinian monk, Gregor Mendel, whose discoveries, published in 1866, remained in obscurity until rediscovered in 1900 by Hugo de Vries, Carl Correns and Erich von Tschermak. Often overlooked, however, is the fact that immediately after the significance of Mendel’s work was grasped, a British physician, Archibald Garrod (1902)Citation expressed the view that alkaptonuria was "an alternative form of metabolism" belonging to a category "... of variations of chemical behavior which are probably present everywhere in minor degrees and just that as no two individuals of a species are absolutely identical in bodily structure neither are their chemical processes carried out on exactly the same lines."

Half a century later, this same theme was picked up by Williams (1956)Citation in a book titled Biochemical Individuality. This work was published just three years after the discovery by Watson and Crick (1953)Citation of the double helical structure of DNA, and several years before the work of Livingstone (1957)Citation and 1958Citation and others confirmed the hypothesis of Haldane (1949)Citation concerning the importance of balanced polymorphisms for the maintenance of genetic variation. In a premolecular era, Williams could not draw upon the wealth of knowledge now available; he had to posit it. His thesis was as follows: "Individuality in nutritional needs is the basis for the genetotrophic approach and for the belief that nutrition applied with due concern for individual genetic variations, which may be large, offers the solution to many baffling health problems" (Williams, 1956Citation ). He noted that the most commonly accepted line of demarcation between "normal" and "abnormal" in biological work is the 95% level, with any individual lying outside this limit being regarded as a deviate. Yet a paradox arises when multiple requirements exist (as in the case of a human diet requiring various vitamins, minerals, essential amino acids and so on). By the stated criterion of normality, if 100 uncorrelated attributes are considered jointly, the probability of meeting all of the criteria together is < 1% (0.95100 = 0.0059). This realization was the basis for Williams’ "... hypothesis that practically every human being is a deviate in some respect ... with an important bearing upon the susceptibility of the individual ... to disease later in life." (Williams 1956Citation ). The data that Williams had to support these powerful ideas were limited to anatomical variants (in the form and placement of the stomach and other internal organs) and physiologic observations (including inorganic and organic composition of the blood concentrations of vitamins in it as well as variations in salivary amino acid patterns), many of which showed sample ranges exceeding 50% of the mean values.

We are now in a strikingly different era of knowledge. The human genome has just been completely sequenced. Approximately 3 billion nucleotides are distributed sequentially among 23 pairs of chromosomes in the nucleus of each body cell. Current estimates are that this mass of material holds ~80,000 operational genes as well as large stretches of unknown function. The activities of ~8000 of these loci already are known, and the race is on to understand the rest as rapidly as possible. In the nutritional realm, progress has been swift. We already are aware of inherited variants affecting metabolism of the sugar fructose (producing disorders known as fructosuria and fructose intolerance), protein components such as the amino acid phenylalanine (leading to phenylketonuria), and fats (resulting in hypobetalipoproteinemia, associated with lower than average risk of cardiovascular disease but higher risk for several cancers as well as pulmonary and gastrointestinal disorders; and related conditions that result in vitamin E deficiency). Variants of this sort are so common that The Journal of Nutrition now includes a category of articles titled Nutrient-Gene Expression; from January through April 2000, four such papers have appeared (Bonnet et al. 2000Citation , Kudo et al. 2000Citation , Metón et al. 2000Citation , Sciaudone et al. 2000Citation ).

The latest nutritional guidelines (Murphy 2001Citation ) incorporate recommended daily allowances for some 30 nutrients. If the metabolic pathway influencing nutritional requirements for each of these nutrients was affected independently by only two alternative alleles at a single genetic locus (almost certainly a substantial underestimate of systemic complexity), then we should expect that the number of alternative genotypes would be 330 or in excess of 200 trillion; three alternative alleles would raise the level of potential diversity to 6 30, i.e., over a billion times higher. The advancing wave of knowledge about the human genome has confirmed the idea that each of us must be genetically unique in our nutritional needs.


    Some sources of genetic influence on human nutritional requirements
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Genetic diversity in human...
 Some sources of genetic...
 Practical implications of...
 Comparative genomics
 REFERENCES
 
Genetically influenced human nutritional requirements include some that are not unique to our species. Although humans may exhibit deficiency symptoms such as scurvy because we cannot synthesize ascorbic acid, this ability was not lost in the course of the 6–8 million years of human existence as a separate evolutionary lineage. Rather, the resultant nutritional requirement is part of our anthropoid heritage; as such, it has been fixed for >30 million years (Jukes 1990Citation ). Jukes and King (1975)Citation proposed that this loss occurred as a result of neutral evolutionary change in which sporadically arising mutations were fixed by genetic drift in some vertebrate populations but not in others, as long as adequate dietary sources of the compound were available continuously. A question might be raised as to whether changes of this sort are strictly neutral because the loss of an unused metabolic pathway can confer a minute gain in energy efficiency, but that is too complex a question to pursue here.

Evidence that inherited influences on nutritional requirements have entered the gene pool of our species at very different times is supported by the hemoglobin alleles. The most widely known expression of these inherited variants is sickle cell disease, which has a genetic trigger and broad systemic ramifications, some with nutritional implications. Compared with ascorbic acid, this marks a relatively new metabolic change. The underlying {beta}-chain mutation became widespread only ~10,000 years ago; its pattern of distribution was attributable chiefly to the origin of swidden horticulture in Africa (Livingstone 1957Citation and 1958Citation ), which replaced tropical forests with clearings and altered the ecological balance in other ways that promote the spread of malarial parasites by mosquito vectors. The gene that causes sickle cell anemia in the homozygous condition confers resistance to malaria in the heterozygous state, so that two alternative alleles are retained in some populations as the result of opposed selective forces. This is the classic example of balanced polymorphism predicted by Haldane (1949)Citation and confirmed by the work of Livingstone and others.


    Practical implications of nutritional individuality
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Genetic diversity in human...
 Some sources of genetic...
 Practical implications of...
 Comparative genomics
 REFERENCES
 
In addition to providing another example of the temporal scale over which genes influencing human nutritional needs have accumulated, as well as illustrating how genetic polymorphism can be maintained in our species, the hemoglobin variants have several other practical implications for nutrition scientists. Some of these arise from the phenomenon of epistasis, in which genes at one locus influence the expression of those at loci elsewhere in the genome. Sauberlich (1994)Citation noted that in patients with sickle cell anemia, RBC membranes are more oxidatively stressed than are those of normal cells. Reportedly, sickle cells spontaneously generate more reactive oxygen variants, including hydrogen peroxide, superoxide anions and hydroxy radicals. Of 18 patients with sickle cell anemia, 50% had leukocyte ascorbic acid levels sufficiently low to be considered consistent with vitamin C deficiency. Given adequate dietary intakes of vitamin C in these patients, utilization of vitamin C must have increased, suggesting that alteration of a single nucleotide base is sufficient to trigger an elevated vitamin requirement.

The various metabolic consequences of hemoglobin variants also illustrate pleiotropy, the technical term for the concept that genes have multiple phenotypic effects. This complication commonly is ignored when we speak of a gene "for" some disease. Thus the allele coding for the hemoglobin S variant commonly is referred to as the "gene for sickle cell anemia," whereas it really is a gene that confers malarial resistance in single dose and has increased in frequency for this reason.

Above all, the hemoglobin variants illustrate that multiple genetic alternatives at polymorphic frequencies (by common convention, >1%) signal functional significance, although under the influence of neutral theory (Kimura 1983Citation ) it has been convenient for several decades to ignore this point. Genes are there because they do things, and as a corollary, alternative alleles are there because there is a value to performing common functions in slightly different ways (e.g., enzymes with different pH or temperature optima) that are made possible by sections of DNA that have slightly different base sequences (Gillespie 1991Citation , Eckhardt 2000Citation ).


    Comparative genomics
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Genetic diversity in human...
 Some sources of genetic...
 Practical implications of...
 Comparative genomics
 REFERENCES
 
Current genetic research is documenting exhaustively the correspondences among genomes of various organisms as well as the extent of genetic variation that exists within species—confirming hypotheses about the functional value of diversity. As recently pointed out by Lander and Weinberg (2000)Citation , when sequencing of the human genome first began to be contemplated seriously around 1985, the project seemed both logistically unlikely and informationally unpromising. In the context of the 3 billion DNA bases comprising the human genome, technological ability to sequence only 300 bases at a time seemed daunting. Similarly, with as much as 95% of the human genome commonly labeled "junk DNA," believed not to either encode for proteins or to hold regulatory information, it seemed that much work would be required for little scientific or practical reward. Nevertheless, investigators pressed on, passing the following milestones: In 1995 sequencing of the first bacterial genome, that of Haemophilus influenzae, with 1.8 million bases (1.8 Mb) was completed (Fleischmann et al. 1995Citation ). In 1996, collaboration among laboratories around the world produced the sequence of the first eukaryote, the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae with a genome of 12 Mb (Clayton et al. 1997Citation ). The next year saw completion of sequencing for the first multicellular organism, the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans, with a genome of 97 Mb (The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium 1998Citation ). In the week of 24 March, 2000 the Drosophila genome sequence was published in the form of three largely complementary papers (Adams et al. 2000Citation , Myers et al. 2000Citation , Rubin et al. 2000Citation ). In the week of June 26, 2000 the human genome sequence was accomplished.

Each genome sequenced represented a gain in size over ones done previously, yet some of the greatest implications for human health lie in the commonalities rather than in the differences. About 30% of Drosophila genes have orthologs (proteins in different organisms that show significant sequence similarities over 80% of their lengths) in the worm Caenorhabditis. Nearly 20% of fly proteins have orthologs in both worms and yeast. To date, Drosophila shows orthologs to 177 of 289 human genes that influence diseases. In the context of this symposium, note that there are Drosophila homologs for insulin, somatostatin, vasopressin, leutotropin and a number of hormones. The future of nutritional studies will in all likelihood be tied to the study of such loci, with data on their variations supplementing family histories and baseline physiologic data already available. The results will be unbelievably rewarding (Sander 2000Citation ).


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Presented at the symposium, Nutritional and Metabolic Diversity: Understanding the Basis of Biologic Variance in the Obesity/Diabetes/Cardiovascular Disease Connection, given at Experimental Biology 2000, April 15–19, 2000 in San Diego, CA. This symposium was sponsored by the American Society for Nutritional Sciences and was supported by an educational grant from Dairy Management, Incorporated. The proceedings of this conference are published as a supplement to The Journal of Nutrition. Guest editors for the supplement publication were Brian W. Tobin, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, GA and Gregory D. Miller, Dairy Management, Incorporated, Rosemont, IL. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Genetic diversity in human...
 Some sources of genetic...
 Practical implications of...
 Comparative genomics
 REFERENCES
 

1. Adams M. D., et al The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. Science (Washington, DC) 2000;287:2185-2195[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Bonnet M., Leroux C., Faulconnier Y., Hocquette J.-F., Martin P., Chilliard Y. Lipoprotein lipase activity and mRNA are up-regulated by refeeding in adipose tissue and cardiac muscle of sheep. J. Nutr. 2000;130:749-756[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Cerami A., Washington E. Sickle Cell Anemia 1974:27 The Third Press New York, NY.

4. Clayton R. A., White O., Ketchum K. A., Venter J. C. The first genome from the third domain of life. Nature (Lond.) 1997;387:459-462[Medline]

5. Eckhardt R. B. Human quantitative genetics: a century of research. Seth P. K. Seth S. eds. Human Genetics 1992:21-34 Omega Scientific Publishers New Delhi, India.

6. Eckhardt R. B. Human Paleobiology 2000 Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK.

7. Fleischmann R. D. et al. Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science (Washington, DC) 1995;269:496-512[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Garrod A. E. The incidence of alkaptonuria: a study in chemical individuality. Lancet 1902;11:1616-1620

9. Gillespie J. H. The Causes of Molecular Evolution 1991 Oxford University Press New York, NY.

10. Haldane J.B.S. The rate of mutation of human genes 1949 Proc. 15th Int. Congr. Genet pp. 267–273. Stockholm, Sweden.

11. Jukes T. H. Nutrition science from vitamins to molecular biology. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1990;10:1-20[Medline]

12. Jukes T. H., King J. L. Evolutionary loss of ascorbic acid synthesizing ability. J. Hum. Evol. 1975;4:85-88

13. Kimura M. The Neutral Allele Theory of Molecular Evolution 1983 Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

14. Kudo H., Doi Y., Nishino T., Nara S., Hamasaki K., Fujimoto S. Dietary zinc deficiency decreases glutathione S-transferase expression in the rat olfactory epithelium. J. Nutr. 2000;130:38-44[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Lander E. S., Weinberg R. A. Genomics: journey to the center of biology. Science (Washington, DC) 2000;287:1777-1782[Free Full Text]

16. Livingstone F. B. Sickling and malaria. Br. Med. J. 1957;1:762-763

17. Livingstone F. B. Anthropological implications of sickle-cell gene distribution in West Africa. Am. Anthropol. 1958;60:553-562

18. Metón I., Caseras A., Cantó E., Fernández F., Baanante I. V. Liver insulin-like growth factor-I mRNA is not affected by diet composition or ration size but shows diurnal variations in regularly fed gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata). J. Nutr. 2000;130:757-760[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Murphy S. P. How consideration of population variance and individuality affects our understanding of nutritional requirements in human health and disease. J. Nutr. 2001;131:361S-365S[Free Full Text]

20. Myers E. W. A whole-genome assembly of Drosophila. Science (Washington, DC) 2000;287:2196-2204[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Rubin G. M., et al Comparative genomics of the eukaryotes. Science (Washington, DC) 2000;287:2204-2218[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Sander C. Genomic medicine and the future of health care. Science (Washington, DC) 2000;287:1977-1978[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Sauberlich H. E. Pharmacology of vitamin C. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1994;14:371-391[Medline]

24. Sciaudone M. P., Chattopadhyay S., Freake H. C. Chelation of zinc amplifies induction of growth hormone mRNA levels in cultured rat pituitary tumor cells. J. Nutr. 2000;130:158-163[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Scriver C. R., Byck S., Prevost L., Hoang L., the PAH Mutation Analysis Consortium The phenylalanine hydroxylase locus: a marker for the history of phenylketonuria and human genetic diversity. Chadwick D. Cardew G. eds. Variation in the Human Genome 1996:73-96 John Wiley & Sons New York, NY.

26. The C. elegans Sequencing Consortium Genome sequence of the nematode C. elegans: a platform for investigating biology. Science (Washington, DC) 1998;282:2012-2018[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Watson J. D., Crick F.H.C. Molecular structure of nucleic acids. Nature (Lond.) 1953;171:737-738[Medline]

28. Williams R. J. Biochemical Individuality 1956 John Wiley & Sons New York, NY.

29. Woolf L. I. The heterozygote advantage of phenylketonuria. American Journal of Human Genetics 1996;38:628-630





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eckhardt, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eckhardt, R. B.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]