(Journal of Nutrition. 2001;131:2764S-2765S.)
© 2001 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences
Supplement
Carbohydrate: Friend or Foe? Summary of Research Needs1
Barbara O. Schneeman2
Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
2To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: boschneeman{at}ucdavis.edu
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
This symposium evaluated the current state of science relative to the
role of carbohydrates in human health and identified priority research
topics to address gaps in our knowledge about carbohydrates and health.
Future revisions of dietary guidelines will benefit from an expanded
research agenda leading to a better understanding of the benefits and
risks of consuming diets high in carbohydrates.
KEY WORDS: carbohydrates fiber triglycerides dietary guidelines
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
The traditional view of dietary carbohydrates has focused on
carbohydrate as an energy source or as nondigestible bulk associated
with dietary fiber. Research in the past 2030 y has expanded our
understanding of carbohydrates in the diet. This emerging view of
carbohydrate encompasses the traditional view of energy source and bulk
but has expanded to several new areas. These emerging areas include
consideration of the glycemic effects of carbohydrate-rich foods,
the importance of fermentable carbohydrate for bowel health and the
changes in physical characteristics of gut contents, such as viscosity,
as well as recognition that carbohydrate-rich foods contain a
variety of physiologically active phytochemicals that may be involved
in lowering the risk of chronic disease.
Dietary guidelines in the United States and other countries have
consistently encouraged diets in which carbohydrates are the primary
source of energy as well as adequate in fiber. However, as evidenced in
the report from the 2000 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee
(1)
, some concern has been raised about the sources of
carbohydrate in the diet. The objectives of this symposium were to
evaluate the current state of science relative to the role of
carbohydrates in human health and to identify priority research topics
to address gaps in our knowledge about carbohydrates and health. The
presentations focus on areas of current interest related to
carbohydrate intake, including the changes in carbohydrate intake in
the U. S. population, the effect of modifying carbohydrate intake
on triglyceride and insulin concentrations and the role of
carbohydrates in food intake regulation and energy balance. Each
presentation outlines specific research needs identified by the author.
This summary highlights four themes for future research that cut across
the presentations.
 |
Adequacy of our monitoring data
|
|---|
We are interested in linking carbohydrate intake to health
outcomes, yet our databases provide only limited information on the
types of carbohydrates in foods. Much of the data are based on
measurements of carbohydrate by difference. Newer analytical approaches
are available and should be used to create new databases of the various
chemical forms of carbohydrates in foods (2)
. In addition,
we must develop new ways to monitor intake among the populations,
especially given the complications due to underreporting of certain
food categories. Energy intake values are typically reported in
absolute amounts, which are difficult to compare across study
variables, such as age, sex, body mass index, physical activity, etc.
Researchers need to develop standardized approachessuch as energy
reported relative to body weightto improve the interpretation of
studies and comparability of data used to develop guidelines
(3)
. It is only with improvements in food composition and
monitoring approaches that we will be able to adequately answer
questions about carbohydrate intake and health outcomes, including
energy balance.
 |
Variability in response to carbohydrate-rich diets
|
|---|
The benefits of increasing carbohydrate intake seem to vary
among individuals. In some cases, this variability in the response to
diets relatively high in carbohydrate have been used to challenge
recommendations to consume diets moderate in energy from fat and high
in energy from carbohydrates (4)
. However, the variability
highlights that research is needed on the interaction of genetic,
dietary and lifestyle factors that influence individual response to
dietary change. For example, factors brought up during the discussion
that might influence the response to high carbohydrate diets include
level of physical activity, types and sources of carbohydrate, body
mass index and weight loss associated with dietary change, lipoprotein
particle phenotype and other genetic variables. Elucidating the effects
of these factors as well as their interactions will enable better
prediction of individuals who might benefit from increases in
carbohydrate consumption. The relative definition of high vs. low
carbohydrate diets is needed to clarify comparisons being made. In the
2000 Dietary Guidelines, low and moderate fat diets were defined as
< 20% energy and 2030% energy, respectively; however, various
investigators may differ in how they have defined high or low
carbohydrate diets.
 |
Variability related to disease and risk factors
|
|---|
Several studies point to an increase in plasma triglycerides when
high carbohydrate, low fat diets are consumed. However, we do not know
whether this increase in triglycerides is predictive of cardiovascular
risk and we do not understand its consequence in the face of decreases
in plasma cholesterol, including both LDL and HDL cholesterol. Does the
increase in triglyceride in individuals with normal triglyceride
concentrations have similar or different implications from elevated
triglyceride levels in hypertriglyceridemic individuals? Various forms
of insulin resistance existdoes carbohydrate play a role in all
situations or only in certain types of disorders? Frequently, the
long-term effects of carbohydrate-containing diets are
extrapolated from short-term studies. This dilemma is especially a
challenge in understanding the role of carbohydrate on food intake
regulation and energy balance and how the source and type of
carbohydrate will influence energy balance over the long-term.
 |
Metabolic response to various forms of carbohydrates
|
|---|
Not only do we need to determine whether the different chemical
forms of carbohydrate have differential effects on metabolism, but we
also need to understand these distinctions in the context of sources of
carbohydrate. Do other factors in foods interact with the metabolic
response to carbohydrate feeding?
The 2000 Dietary Guidelines for Americans encourage consumption of
diets that are high in fruits, vegetables and grainsfoods that are
typically good sources of carbohydrates, including dietary fiber.
However, these guidelines also encourage sensible choices to moderate
intake of foods and beverages that provide primarily sugars and few
additional nutrients. Future revisions of the dietary guidelines will
benefit from an expanded research agenda, leading to a better
understanding of the benefits and risks of consuming diets high in
carbohydrates.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
1 Presented as part of the symposium entitled
"CarbohydratesFriend or Foe" given at the Experimental
Biology 2001 Meeting held March 31 through April 4, 2001 in
Orlando, FL. This symposium was sponsored by the American Society for
Nutritional Sciences and the International Life Sciences Institute
Research Foundations Human Nutrition Institute. The proceedings of
this symposium are published as a supplement to The Journal of
Nutrition. The views expressed herein are those of the authors
and do not necessarily reflect those of the ILSI Research Foundation.
Guest editor for the symposium publication was Suzanne Harris, ILSI
Research Foundation, Human Nutrition Institute, Washington, DC. 
 |
LITERATURE CITED
|
|---|
1.
Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (2000) Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2000 2000 U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Beltsville, MD .
2.
Food and Agriculture Organization and World Health Organization (1998) Carbohydrates in Human Nutrition: Food and Agricultural Organization Nutrition Paper 66 1998 Food and Agriculture Organization Rome, Italy .
3.
Grandjean A. C. (1997) Diets of elite athletes: has the discipline of sports nutrition made an impact?. J. Nutr. 127:874S-877S.[Medline]
4.
Taubes G. (2001) The soft science of dietary fat. Science 291:2536-2545.[Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Neuhouser, L. F. Tinker, C. Thomson, B. Caan, L. V. Horn, L. Snetselaar, L. M. Parker, R. E. Patterson, R. Robinson-O'Brien, S. A. A. Beresford, et al.
Development of a Glycemic Index Database for Food Frequency Questionnaires Used in Epidemiologic Studies
J. Nutr.,
June 1, 2006;
136(6):
1604 - 1609.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. S. Volek, M. J. Sharman, and C. E. Forsythe
Modification of Lipoproteins by Very Low-Carbohydrate Diets
J. Nutr.,
June 1, 2005;
135(6):
1339 - 1342.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Sharman, W. J. Kraemer, D. M. Love, N. G. Avery, A. L. Gomez, T. P. Scheett, and J. S. Volek
A Ketogenic Diet Favorably Affects Serum Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Disease in Normal-Weight Men
J. Nutr.,
July 1, 2002;
132(7):
1879 - 1885.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|
Copyright © 2001 by American Society for Nutrition