Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawey, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sawey, M. J.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2001;131:167S-169S.)
© 2001 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Supplement

Role of Gap-Junctional Communication in Breast Cancer Progression and Chemoprevention1 ,2

Mary Jean Sawey

Department of Radiation Oncology, Temple University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19140


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Although the etiology of breast cancer is varied, it is likely that the modulation of oncogene and tumor suppressor gene expression may play an important role in mammary tumorigenesis. Consistent with this possibility is the finding of gene amplification or the enhanced expression of various oncogenes in primary human breast tumors and breast tumor cell lines (Callahan 1987Citation , Callahan and Campbell 1989Citation ). Overall, these human tissue and animal studies suggest that mammary tumors arise in a multistep process and may involve the activation and inactivation of multiple oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes.

Tumor suppressor genes are considered likely to be important in human breast cancer (Marshall 1991Citation , Sager 1992Citation ). In contrast to oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes inhibit cell proliferation, and their loss is associated with tumorigenesis. A screen for tumor suppressor genes from human mammary epithelial cells resulted in the cloning of a gene encoding a gap junction protein (Lee at al. 1991Citation ). It has long been speculated that gap junctions mediate cell-cell interactions important in growth suppression and regulation (Loewenstein 1979Citation ). For example, coculturing of transformed cells with normal cells can suppress cell proliferation and other characteristics associated with the transformed phenotype (Mehta et al. 1986Citation , Stoker et al. 1966Citation ). In one study, growth suppression was correlated with the efficiency of gap-junctional coupling between the transformed and nontransformed cells (Mehta et al. 1986Citation ). Other studies also showed that the transfection of connexin gene expression vectors into tumor cells can restore normal cell growth in vitro (Hirischi et al. 1996Citation , Mehta et al. 1991Citation , Zhu et al. 1991Citation ) and reduce tumorigenicity in vivo (Eghbali et al. 1991Citation , Rose et al. 1993Citation ).

Gap junctions are composed of proteins known as the connexins (Bennett et al. 1991Citation , Beyer et al. 1990Citation , Kumar and Gilula 1992Citation ). One of the most widely expressed connexin genes, connexin (Cx) 43, is also found in the mammary epithelium (Lee et al. 1991Citation and 1992Citation ). In addition, the mammary epithelium also contains Cx26 (Lee et al. 1991Citation and 1992Citation ), a connexin gene often coexpressed with Cx43 or Cx32. Moreover, gap junction gene expression in human breast cancer tissue and cells is consistently down-regulated (Lee et al. 1992Citation , Wilgenbus et al. 1992Citation ). A role for gap-junctional perturbation in mammary tumorigenesis is suggested by the finding that all mammary tumors are deficient in gap junctions (Wilgenbus et al. 1992Citation ), and cells derived from mammary tumors do not exhibit gap junction–mediated cell-cell communication (Lee et al. 1992Citation ). These findings further indicate the possible importance of gap junctions in the regulation of mammary epithelial cell proliferation.

Chemoprevention is a new area of breast cancer research that shows great promise. In particular, tamoxifen, progestins and retinoids have been shown to be effective in lowering the risk of breast cancer (Dickens and Colletta 1993Citation ). Another class of compounds that may be useful for breast cancer chemoprevention is the trypsin and chymotrypsin protease inhibitors derived from various vegetables. The efficacy of protease inhibitors in cancer prevention is well documented (Kennedy 1993aCitation ). For example, protease inhibitors have been shown to suppress carcinogen-induced malignant transformation of tissue culture cells (Kennedy 1993Citation ). There is also a large body of data from animal studies that demonstrates the anticarcinogenic activity of protease inhibitors (Kennedy 1993Citation ).

In this study, we examined a soybean-derived protease inhibitor, the Bowman-Birk inhibitor (BBI), as a possible breast cancer chemopreventive agent. Bowman-Birk inhibitor suppresses tumorigenesis in several experimental carcinogenesis model systems (Kennedy 1993aCitation ). In addition and of particular significance to these studies is the observation that a soybean diet rich in protease inhibitors (e.g., BBI) lowered the breast tumor incidence in irradiated rats (Troll et al. 1980Citation ). Our interest in BBI is further motivated by several considerations of a more practical nature. First, BBI, a product derived from a natural food source (soy beans), is likely to be nontoxic to humans. Second, the animal studies of Kennedy and co-workers (Kennedy 1993bCitation , Oreffo et al. 1991Citation ) have shown the efficacy and safety of BBI as a cancer chemopreventive agent. Third, these studies also demonstrated that BBI can maintain its cancer chemopreventive potency even when administered as a dietary supplement (Kennedy et al. 1993Citation ). Hence, it is likely that BBI will be eminently suitable as a cancer chemopreventive agent for use in humans.

Although the mechanisms by which protease inhibitors suppress carcinogenesis are unknown, they are thought to act as antipromotional agents in many of the in vitro and in vivo two-stage carcinogenesis experimental models (Kennedy 1984Citation , Troll et al. 1970Citation ). The suppression of malignant transformation by BBI and other anticarcinogenic protease inhibitors has been suggested to be mediated via their effects on the expression of c-myc and other genes or oncogenes involved in the initiation, promotion or progression of the malignant phenotype (St. Clair and St. Clair 1991Citation ).

In this paper, we report our finding that the expression of a gap junction gene Cx43 is induced in human mammary epithelial cells after BBI treatment. This observation is particularly intriguing because gap junctions are proposed to play a role in growth suppression and tumor promotion. Moreover, as mentioned above, human breast cancer cells have been shown to be deficient in gap junctions (Lee et al. 1992Citation , Wilgenbus et al. 1992Citation ).


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell culture.

Cells were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and antibiotics (penicillin, 100 U/mL; streptomycin, 100 mg/L). Each cell line was cultured under two different conditions. The control condition was growth in their respective media. The treated condition was growth in their media with the addition of BBI (100 mg/L). Cells were grown to 80% confluence and then starved of serum for 24 h. They were subsequently serum stimulated for 4 h in medium containing twice (20%) the initial serum concentration. The cells were scraped, pelleted and flash-frozen at the end of the 4 h for subsequent RNA isolation for Northern analysis.

Northern analysis.

We isolated total cellular RNA by the RNAzol B Method (Cinna/Biotecx, Houston, TX). Total RNA (10 µg) were denatured and resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis and then blotted onto Duralose-UV nitrocellulose membranes (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The blots were hybridized to human Cx43 riboprobes. In addition, each Northern blot was rehybridized to a riboprobe for the ribosomal protein gene rpl32 (obtained from S. Liebhaber, Washington University, St. Louis) to control for possible variations in RNA loading.

Functional analysis in cell lines.

Gap-junctional communication was examined by using microelectrode impalements to iontophoretically inject fluorescent dye tracer (such as carboxyfluorescein or Lucifer yellow) into individual cells and then monitoring the movement of the fluorescent dye between cells. The efficiency of gap-junctional communication was quantitated by determining the rate at which cells that were 1st-, 2nd- and 3rd-order removed from the impalement site were filled with the fluorescent dye tracer.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Modulation of connexin 43 expression by Bowman-Birk inhibitor.

In preliminary experiments, we observed by Northern blot hybridization that treatment of a rodent fibroblast cell line (C3H/10T1/2) with the protease inhibitor BBI resulted in a four- to fivefold increase in the expression of transcripts from the gap junction gene Cx43 (Fig. 1ACitation , BCitation ). A similar induction of Cx43 transcripts was seen when these cells were treated with a synthetic protease inhibitor, Antipain (Fig. 1ACitation , BCitation ). In contrast, we noted that there was only a low level of Cx43 transcripts in the radiation-transformed C3H/10T1/2 cell line (Fig. 1BCitation ), a characteristic of transformed cell lines in general. We also determined that the BBI-mediated increase in Cx43 transcripts was correlated with an increase in the level of gap-junctional coupling in BBI-treated C3H/10T1/2 cells (data not shown). This was demonstrated with the examination of dye coupling using intracellular microelectrode impalements to inject the fluorescent dye tracer carboxyfluorescein. These microelectrode impalement studies showed that the BBI-treated cells exhibited an increased level of gap-junctional communication, as indicated by the very extensive spread of the fluorescent dye tracer. In comparison, the nontreated cells exhibited only a low level of dye transfer.



View larger version (50K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Northern blot analysis of RNA isolated from C3H10T1/2 cells treated with the protease inhibitors/Bowman-Birk inhibitor (BBI) and Antipain. Each lane was loaded with 10 µg of total RNA, and hybridization was carried out using a 32P-radiolabeled mouse Cx43 riboprobe (p132). The expected position of the 3.2-kb Cx43 transcript is denoted by the arrowhead. Note that the blot in panel B includes RNA sample isolated from a radiation transformed C3H10T1/2 cell line (10T-TR 2–5 Rad Trans). Also note that the blot in panel B was washed at a lower stringency to permit visualization of the 18S ribosomal RNA band.

 
We also examined the effects of the protease inhibitor BBI on Cx43 expression in the human mammary epithelial cell lines, MCF-10, MCF-7 and BT-20. MCF-10 is a spontaneously immortalized mammary epithelial cell line derived from human fibroblastic mammary tissue. It is nontumorigenic and likely represents cells that have been initiated along the pathway to malignancy but are still premalignant (Soule et al. 1990Citation ). In contrast, MCF-7 and BT-20 are tumorigenic cells derived from human breast cancer tissues (Soule et al. 1973Citation ). Northern blot analysis revealed that BBI treatment of MCF-10 led to an induction of Cx43 transcript expression, whereas no Cx43 transcripts were detected in MCF-7 or BT-20, either with or without BBI treatment (Fig. 2Citation ) These findings are particularly intriguing because in previous studies, BBI was shown to exert its anticarcinogenic effects only at the initiation and promotional stages of tumor progression, with no suppressive effects elicited on fully malignant cells or tumors (Kennedy 1984Citation , Troll et al. 1970Citation ).



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Northern blot analysis of RNA isolated from various human mammary epithelial cell lines. Each lane was loaded with 10 µg of total RNA, and hybridization was carried out using a 32P-radiolabeled human Cx43 cDNA riboprobe (transcribed from plasmid HCJ2; obtained from G. Fishman, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, N.Y.). Note that although the Cx43 transcript (3.2-kb band denoted by arrowhead) was observed only in the MCF-10 sample treated with Bowman-Birk inhibitor, the same amount of RNA was loaded in each lane. This was confirmed by the finding of a similar ethidium bromide staining intensity in each lane for the two rRNA bands.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
These observations suggest that gap junction genes may indeed be a target for regulation by BBI. Moreover, the up-regulation of gap junction gene expression by BBI is consistent with the observations from Sager’s laboratory (Lee et al. 1991Citation ), suggesting that gap junctions may be categorized as tumor suppressor genes. Overall, these preliminary results suggest that the MCF-10 mammary epithelial cell line is an excellent model system for examining the effects of BBI on gap junction gene expression. We hypothesize that gap junctions may play a role in early events in the progression of mammary tumorigenesis and that these events may be modulated by protease inhibitors.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
I wish to acknowledge Cecilia Lo, University of Pennsylvania, for carrying out the functional cellular communications experiments.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Presented at the American Institute for Cancer Research 10th Annual Research Conference, The Role of Nutrition in Preventing and Treating Breast and Prostate Cancer, held in Washington, DC, August 31–September 1, 2000. This symposium was sponsored by the American Institute for Cancer Research. The proceedings of the conference are published as a supplement to The Journal of Nutrition. The guest editor for the supplement publication was Ritva Butrum, American Institute for Cancer Research, Washington, DC. Back

2 Supported by a grant from the American Institute for Cancer Research. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

1. Bennett M.V.L., Bargiello T. A., Barrio L., Spray D. C., Hertzberg E. L., Saez J. C. Gap junction: new tools, new answers, new questions. Neuron 1991;6:305-320[Medline]

2. Beyer E. C., Paul D. L., Goodenough D. A. Connexin family of gap junction proteins. J. Membr. Biol. 1990;116:187-194[Medline]

3. Callahan R. Retrovirus and proto-oncogene involvement in the etiology of breast neoplasia. Neville M. Daniel C. W. eds. The Mammary Gland Development, Regulation and Function 1987:323-351 Plenum Press New York, NY.

4. Callahan R., Campbell G. Mutations in breast cancer: an overview. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1989;81:1780-1786[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Dickens T.-A., Colletta A. A. The pharmacological manipulation of members of the transforming growth factor beta family in the chemoprevention of breast cancer. BioEssays 1993;15:71-74[Medline]

6. Eghbali B., Kessler J. A., Reid L. M., Roy C., Spray D. C. Involvement of gap junctions in tumorigenesis: transfection of tumor cells with Cx32 cDNA retards growth in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991;88:10701-10705[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Hirischi K. K., Xu C.-E., Tsukamoto T., Sager R. Gap junction gene Cx26 and Cx43 individually suppress the cancer phenotype of human mammary carcinoma cells and restore differentiation potential. Cell Growth Differ 1996;7:861-870[Abstract]

8. Kennedy A. R. Promotion and other interactions between agents in the induction of transformation in vitro in fibroblasts. Slaga T. J. eds. Mechanisms of Tumor Promotion, Vol. III, Tumor Promotion and Carcinogenesis in Vitro 1984:13-55 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL.

9. Kennedy A. R. Anticarcinogenic activity of protease inhibitors. Troll W. Kennedy A. R. eds. Protease Inhibitors as Cancer Chemopreventive Agents 1993a:65-91 Plenum Publishing New York, NY.

10. Kennedy A. R. Cancer prevention by protease inhibitors. Prev. Med. 1993b;22:796-811[Medline]

11. Kennedy A. R., Szuhaj B. F., Newberne P. M., Billings P. C. Preparation and production of a cancer chemopreventive agent, Bowman-Birk inhibitor concentrate. Nutr. Cancer 1993;19:281-302[Medline]

12. Kumar N. M., Gilula N. B. Molecular biology and genetics of gap junction channels. Semin. Cell Biol. 1992;8:3-19

13. Lee S., Tomasetto C., Paul D., Keyomarsi K., Sager R. Transcriptional downregulation of gap-junction proteins block junctional communication in human mammary tumor cell lines. J. Cell Biol. 1992;118:1213-1221[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Lee S. W., Tomasetto C., Sager R. Positive selection of candidate tumor-suppressor genes by subtractive hybridization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991;88:2825-2829[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Loewenstein W. Junctional intercellular communication and the control of growth. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1979;561:1-65[Medline]

16. Marshall C. J. Tumor suppressor genes. Cell 1991;74:313-326

17. Mehta P. P., Bertran J. S., Loewenstein W. R. Growth inhibition of transformed cells correlates with their junctional communication with normal cells. Cell 1986;44:187-196[Medline]

18. Mehta P. P., Holtz-Wagenblatt A., Rose B., Shalloway D., Loewenstein W. R. Incorporation of the gene for a cell-cell channel protein into transformed cells leads to normalization of growth. J. Membr. Biol. 1991;124:207-225[Medline]

19. Oreffo V.I.C., Billings P. C., Kennedy A. R., Witschi H. Acute effects of the Bowman-Birk protease inhibitor in mice. Toxicology 1991;69:165-176[Medline]

20. Rose B., Mehta P., Loewenstein W. R. Gap-junction protein gene suppresses tumorigenicity. Carcinogenesis 1993;14:1073-1075[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Sager R. Tumor suppressor genes in the cell cycle. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1992;4:155-160[Medline]

22. Soule H. D., Maloney T. M., Wolman S. R., Peterson W. D., Brenz R., McGrath C. M., Russo J., Pauley R. J., Jones R. F., Brooks S. C. Isolation and characterization of a spontaneously immortalized human breast epithelial cell line, MCF-10. Cancer Res 1990;50:6075-6086[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Soule H. D., Vazquez J., Long A., Albert S., Brennan M. A human cell line from a pleural effusion derived from a breast carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1973;51:1409-1413

24. St. Clair W. H., St. Clair D. K. Effect of the Bowman-Birk protease inhibitor on the expression of oncogenes in the irradiated mouse colon. Cancer Res 1991;51:4539-4543[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Stoker M., Shearer M., O’Neill C. Growth inhibition of polyoma-transformed cells by contact with static normal fibroblasts. J. Cell Sci. 1966;1:297-310[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Troll W., Klassen A., Janoff A. Tumorigenesis in mouse skin: inhibition by synthetic inhibitors of proteases. Science (Washington, DC) 1970;169:1211-1213[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Troll W., Wiesner B., Shellabarger C. J., Holtzman S., Stone J. S. Soybean diet lowers breast tumor incidence in irradiated rats. Carcinogenesis 1980;1:469-472[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Wilgenbus K. K, Kirkpatrick C. J., Knuechel R., Willecke K., Traub O. Expression of Cx26, Cx32 and Cx43 gap junction proteins in normal and neoplastic human tissues. Int. J. Cancer 1992;51:522-529[Medline]

29. Zhu D., Caveney S., Kidder G. M., Naus C.C.G. Transfection of C6 glioma cells with connexin 43 cDNA: analysis of expression, inter-cellular coupling and cell proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991;88:1883-1887[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Vet PatholHome page
L. N. Torres, J. M. Matera, C. H. Vasconcellos, J. L. Avanzo, F. J. Hernandez-Blazquez, and M. L. Z. Dagli
Expression of Connexins 26 and 43 in Canine Hyperplastic and Neoplastic Mammary Glands
Vet. Pathol., September 1, 2005; 42(5): 633 - 641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawey, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sawey, M. J.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2001 by American Society for Nutrition