Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pointing, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pointing, G.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2001;131:127-131.)
© 2001 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Article

Wheat Aleurone Flour Increases Cecal ß-Glucuronidase Activity and Butyrate Concentration and Reduces Colon Adenoma Burden in Azoxymethane-Treated Rats

Graeme H. McIntosh, Peter J. Royle and Greg Pointing1

CSIRO Health Sciences and Nutrition, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia

1To whom correspondence should be addressed at P.O. Box 10041. E-mail: graeme.mcintosh{at}hsn.csiro.au


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Processed wheat aleurone flour (WAF) is a source of insoluble fermentable dietary fiber that comes from the outer layers of the wheat kernel. A study was designed to evaluate WAF, wheat bran (WB) and {alpha}-cellulose as the source of dietary fiber (5 g/100 g of diet) in a semipurified high fat (20 g/100 g of as 1:1 lard/sunflower seed oil) diet fed to male Sprague-Dawley rats in which intestinal tumors were induced using azoxymethane (AOM). WAF at 33 g/100 g of diet (WAF33) and WB at 16 g/100 g of diet (WB16) increased the weight of feces and produced significantly higher concentrations in the cecum of the short-chain fatty acid butyrate (P < 0.001) than did no fiber (NF) and WAF added at only 10 g/100 g (1.5 g of dietary fiber) (WAF10). Cecal and fecal pH were both significantly lower in the WAF33 and WB16 treatments relative to control and no fiber treatments (P < 0.001). The intestinal tumors in the rats were assessed at 6 mo after the study began, and the WAF33- or WB16-fed rats showed a trend (P = 0.06) with 43% fewer colon adenomas relative to control. There was a significant inverse relationship between ß-glucuronidase activity and colon adenomas in the rat colon (r2 = 0.37, P = 0.001). WAF fiber influenced some metabolic markers of fermentation in the colon in a manner similar to that of WB, which, independent of the bulking effect, was associated with a trend to reduced colon adenomas. Significantly increased cecal ß-glucuronidase activity and/or butyrate concentrations may have protective influences in this context by mechanisms not yet fully elucidated.


KEY WORDS: • azoxymethane • colon tumors • wheat aleurone flour • ß-glucuronidase • rats


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Wheat bran (WB)2 is generally recognized as being protective against colon cancer, an effect attributable to it being a relatively concentrated source of insoluble dietary fiber (DF) (1Citation 2Citation 3Citation 4)Citation . Other components of the fiber-rich outer layers of wheat have also been proposed as having a protective role, e.g., phytate, phenolics, lignans, phytosterols and vitamins such as E and the B group (5Citation 6Citation 7Citation , 35Citation ). Wheat aleurone flour (WAF) is a product of milling and processing that represents primarily the aleurone layer of wheat but also some germ, which accounts for 6–7% of the kernel. It is an excellent source of DF, proteins and some minerals and vitamins, as well as phenolic compounds (8Citation , 9Citation ).

It often is not possible to investigate the influence of dietary components on colon cancer risk in humans through human intervention studies. Animal studies of chemically induced colon cancer may provide a useful lead in identifying potentially preventative dietary strategies and in helping to clarify likely mechanisms by which protection might be achieved. The rat azoxymethane (AOM) model of colon cancer is used experimentally for this purpose (10Citation , 11Citation ). AOM is a metabolite of the procarcinogen 1,2-dimethylhydrazine and is one metabolic step closer to the proximate carcinogen capable of inducing colon tumors (adenomas and adenocarcinomas).

WAF was tested in this model along with WB, {alpha}-cellulose and a no-fiber (NF) treatment to assess its protective potential. AIN-93 diet is regularly used in such cancer studies (7)Citation . High fat diets (20 g/100 g) increase tumor expression in this experimental model (12Citation , 13Citation ). Previous studies have established that 5% DF should be sufficient to prevent the promotional influence of a high fat diet (7)Citation . WAF was provided at two concentrations of DF (1.5 and 5 g/100 g) to evaluate its effect against induced colon tumorigenesis.

Potential mechanisms of protection could involve the fermentation in the cecum and colon of DF to produce potentially antineoplastic products. For example, high concentrations of butyrate in the colon may offer protection (4Citation , 13Citation ). This and lowered pH are potentially useful markers of fermentation (4Citation , 14Citation ), whereas ß-glucuronidase activity is a marker of enzyme activity that may release from bound form (diglycosides) factors such as lignans (diphenolics), which are potentially protective (15Citation , 16Citation ). These biomarkers have therefore been included in this study, along with other measures routinely used in this type of tumor end point study.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Diets.

WAF (WAF-Nature’s Gold; Goodman Fielder, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia) was assayed for composition and used as the DF source in comparison with WB and {alpha}-cellulose (C-8002; Sigma Chemicals Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia) when supplied at 5 g of DF/100 g of diet. The WAF and WB were supplied by the Milling and Baking Group of Goodman Fielder, New South Wales. On analysis, the composition of WAF was found to be 15.4 g of DF (as non–starch polysaccharide)/100 g, 23.6 g of protein/100 g, 36.5 g of starch/100 g, 6.5 g of fat/100 g, 5.1 g of moisture/100 g of and 2.36 g of phytate/100 g. The composition of WB was 31.6 g of DF/100 g, 17.8 g of protein/100 g, 21.6 g of starch/100 g, 5.2 g of fat/100 g, 10.4 g of moisture/100 g of and 1.96 g of phytate/100 g.

WAF was mixed into a semipurified diet based on AIN-93 formulation, modified to contain high fat (20 g/100 g of as equal parts lard and sunflower seed oil), DL-methionine in place of L-cystine at 0.3 g/100 g of and no added ultra trace elements (AIN-93G). The experimental diets were as follows: 1) the control diet contained 5 g of {alpha}-cellulose/100 g of as fiber source, 2) NF with extra corn starch in place of fiber, 3) WAF (WAF10) contained 10 g of WAF/100 g of diet, which provided 1.5% DF, 4) WAF33 (33 g of WAF/100 g of diet), which provided 5% of DF and 5) WB16 (16 g of WB/100 g of diet), which provided 5% DF. All diets were equally balanced for the levels of protein, fiber, fat, energy and the proportionally larger micronutrients such as calcium, phosphate, iron and sodium. The full compositions of the diets are shown in Table 1Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Composition of experimental diets

 
Experimental design.

Weanling specific-pathogen–free male Sprague-Dawley rats were supplied by the Animal Resource Center (Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia). They were housed in the small animal colony facility at CSIRO Health Sciences and Nutrition (Adelaide, South Australia) in stainless steel wire cages and were maintained in an air-conditioned environment at 23°C with a 12-h light/dark cycle. One hundred rats were divided into five groups matched for body weight and consumed ad libitum the experimental diets in powdered form. All procedures used in this study were reviewed and approved by the Animal Experimentation Ethics Committee before commencement and met the principles of the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes (AGPS, Canberra, Australia).

Gastrointestinal tumors were induced by subcutaneously injecting AOM in saline adjusted to pH 7. In this experiment, two doses of AOM at 20 mg/kg body were administered 1 week apart to the rats 4 wk after they were established on the experimental diets. Daily food intakes and fecal outputs were measured midway through the experiment by placing the rats in metabolism cages for two 24-h periods.

Body weights were measured weekly throughout the experiment (6 mo), and with five rats per cage, any potential competition for feed was minimized. At the end of the experiment, signs of tumors appeared, and the rats were anesthetized with halothane. Blood samples were removed via exsanguination from abdominal aorta, and the rats subsequently killed. Tissue and blood samples were stored at -20°C for subsequent biochemical analysis. Tumors were assessed for malignancy using Dukes’ classification (17)Citation , after being fixed and processed for histopathological assessment. The tumors were categorized into adenomas (or polyps) and adenocarcinomas (malignant tumors). Tumor mass index was assessed as the log transformed summed area of colon tumors in each rat. Other indices used were colon tumors/rat (burden) and percentage of rats with total intestinal and colonic tumors (incidence).

The biochemical assays used in this study have been previously published (7)Citation . Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) were assayed by gas chromatography, and ß-glucuronidase was assayed according to the method of Goldin and Gorbach (18)Citation as modified by Jenab and Thompson (17)Citation but with 0.3 mol trichloroacetic acid/L excluded in the final step, before phenolphthalein color development and spectrophotometric assay.

The pH of fecal samples taken from the rectum at autopsy and cecal samples were measured by homogenizing samples in pure water and measuring with a calibrated pH meter. The results are expressed as mg phenolphthalein released/(g cecal contents · h).

Statistical analysis.

Tumor incidence and burden data (adenomas and adenocarcinomas per treatment group) were analyzed by {chi}2 test. Tumor incidence was calculated as contingency tables for the total number of rats with colon tumors. This was tested for differences in counts using a generalized linear model with binomial error distribution. A generalized linear model with a Poisson distribution of errors was used to analyze the differences between the diets using the number of colon tumors observed in each rat, as well as the number of adenomas and adenocarcinomas. A log transformation was required for ß-glucuronidase to obtain homogeneity, because non-normality was observed, with the error proportional to the mean. Back-transformed values were corrected for bias by multiplying the back-transformed mean by the correction e1/2{varsigma}2 (31Citation ,32Citation ). The relationship between the number of colon adenomas and ß-glucuronidase activity was examined using regression analysis. The other biochemical data were analyzed by parametric analysis with ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparisons. P-values for ANOVA of differences between means of each treatment are shown in tables, with significant difference at P < 0.05, unless otherwise indicated. Values are given as means ± SEM.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The body weights of rats at the end of the experiment did not differ between experimental treatments. Body weight for all treatment groups was 626 ± 16 g. There were no differences among groups in blood hematocrits (overall mean of 0.36 ± 0.06).

The incidence of rats with small and large intestinal tumors did not differ between treatments, with 80–90% of rats being affected (Table 2Citation ). The incidence of rats with colon tumors fed the WAF33 diet tended to be lower than the control group (P = 0.10). Tumor burden (adenomas/group and adenomas/rat) for WAF33 rats tended to be lower than the control (P = 0.06 and P = 0.07, respectively).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Indices of azoxymethane-induced intestinal tumorigenesis in male Sprague-Dawley rats fed diets containing no fiber (NF) wheat aleurone flour (WAF) or wheat bran (WB)12

 
WB-fed rats tended to have fewer colon tumors with a 15% reduction in incidence (P = 0.10) and a 40% reduction in colon tumor burden (P = 0.06). For the WAF33-fed rats, the number of colon adenomas was 43% lower than the control and WAF10-fed rats (P = 0.07). Colon adenocarcinomas were not different in number and there was no difference in tumor mass index among groups.

Fecal weights were significantly (P < 0.001) greater in control ({alpha}-cellulose), WAF33 and WB16 groups than in WAF10 and NF groups (Table 3Citation ). That is, there was a significant fecal bulking effect evident with the addition of 5% DF, whether as {alpha}-cellulose, WAF or WB. There were no significant differences in weight of cecal contents among groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Metabolic and biochemical indices of fermentative activity in feces and cecal contents of rats fed diets containing no fiber (NF), wheat aleurone flour (WAF) or wheat bran (WB)12

 
A significant reduction (P < 0.001) in fecal pH occurred with WAF10 (6%), WAF33 (11%) and WB16 (12%) relative to control and NF groups. A significant reduction (P < 0.05) was also seen in cecal pH for WAF10 (3.4%), WAF33 (6%) and WB (7%) relative to control and NF groups. Cecal SCFA were also affected: propionate was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in the NF group than in the WB16 or control group. Cecal butyrate concentrations were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in control, WAF33 and WB16 groups than in NF or WAF10 groups. Acetate concentrations in cecal contents or in feces did not differ among groups. SCFA concentrations in cecal samples were approximately twice those of the feces, except for WAF10 and WAF33, where the difference was ~3-fold.

The influence of dietary treatments on ß-glucuronidase activity [µmol phenolphthalein released/(h · g cecal contents)] in cecal contents were measured. There was a significantly higher activity (P < 0.001) in the WB16 and WAF33 groups relative to control and NF groups. A similar result was observed when the ß-glucuronidase activity was expressed relative to cecal protein content (data not shown). An assessment of ß-glucuronidase activity relative to colon adenomas showed that they were inversely correlated (r2 = 0.37, P < 0.05) (see Fig. 1Citation ). The lowest numbers of adenomas were associated with the highest activity of the cecal enzyme. An analysis of the individual rat data showed a significant (P < 0.05) inverse relationship existed between cecal butyrate concentration and adenocarcinomas; rats with higher cecal butyrate concentrations had fewer adenocarcinomas (P < 0.05) (Table 4Citation ).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Relationship between total number of colon adenomas and ß-glucuronidase activity [µmol phenolphthalein/(h/g cecal contents)] in linear regression analysis showed an inverse correlation, r2 = 0.37, P < 0.05, n = 8. NF = no fiber; WAF33 = 33g/100g diet; WB16 = 16g/100g diet; WAF10 = 10g/100g diet.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Cecal butyrate concentration in rats with and without colon adenocarcinomas1

 
Visualization by polarized light microscopy of cereal fibers was undertaken in stained cross sections of rat feces (Fig. 2Citation ). The difference in size and shape of fibers can be seen for {alpha}-cellulose relative to WAF and WB. WB fibers were coarser in texture than for WAF and {alpha}-cellulose. Cereal fiber was virtually absent from the feces of NF rats. Protein levels (observed histologically as Ponceau red–stained material) were also assessed in the cross sections of feces of rats fed the various diets but showed no differences.



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Low power microscopy (10x magnification) of rat feces from a rat in each dietary treatment. Dietary fiber appears white using polarized light. NF = no fiber; WAF10 = 10g/100g diet; WAF33 = 33g/100g diet; WB16 = 16g/100g diet.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The introduction of WAF at 33% of the diet tended to reduce colon adenoma burden in AOM-treated rats. This response was similar in magnitude to the response observed when WB was added at the same fiber level and relative to control ({alpha}-cellulose) and NF dietary treatments. Previous studies have shown that a 5–6% cereal DF addition to a high fat diet was sufficient to produce a significant tumor reduction in this model, when added as wheat, rice or barley bran (7Citation ,19Citation , 20Citation ). Reduction in the barley study by commercial barley bran was relative to other byproducts of barley processing added at the same fiber level as in this study. Although previous research has shown that {alpha}-cellulose was protective (21)Citation , the fact that these results were obtained relative to a {alpha}-cellulose control somewhat strengthens the evidence for protection shown by the cereal fiber sources tested. Others have added higher percentages of cereal fiber (8–12% DF) to demonstrate a significant effect in these animal cancer models (13Citation , 22Citation , 23Citation ,33Citation ,34Citation ). The source of cereal DF is important, because some sources, such as oat bran, with a high proportion of soluble fiber do not offer protection with this cancer model (24Citation , 25Citation ). It is possible that a greater addition of WAF (e.g., 10% DF) could have enhanced the present findings. However, this would have involved more than half of the diet as wheat aleurone, whereas the level used here translates in human diet terms to an equivalent intake of 25 g DF, a recommended human intake. WB usually has a higher concentration of DF (48–50 g/100 g) than the source used here, and it may be that the lower dietary fiber product (less than one third) used here diminished its effectiveness in this context.

Other significant functional effects in the colon were observed in the WAF33 and WB16 groups that are considered beneficial in terms of bowel health. These included a significant reduction in fecal and cecal pH evident with WB and WAF at the 5% added fiber level, an effect associated with reduced tumorigenesis (26)Citation . The elevated cecal (but not fecal) butyrate concentrations in the rats fed WAF and WB suggested a possible protective influence of the butyrate generated in the cecum and proximal colon, as has been reported previously (4Citation , 7Citation , 13Citation , 27Citation ). The experimental evidence in this study and elsewhere (36)Citation that adenocarcinomas were significantly fewer in rats with high cecal butyrate concentrations deserves more investigation as to its relevance. In addition, the cecal ß-glucuronidase activity was inversely proportional to the number of colonic adenomas. The potential for a higher ß-glucuronidase activity to enhance protectiveness by release of certain phytochemicals from conjugated form (e.g. lignans) in the colon lumen was proposed by Jenab and Thompson (15)Citation . Others (14Citation , 28Citation , 29Citation ) have proposed or inferred the opposite: that increased colonic ß-glucuronidase activity is associated with a Western diet (high meat and fat) and possibly reflects an undesirable influence on colonic health, by releasing toxic or mutagenic compounds. More work is needed to elucidate the nature and relevance of this observation.

In conclusion, WAF when added at a 5% DF level to a high fat rat diet produces some significant changes that were associated with a trend for tumor burden reduction. Given the relatively low fiber content (it contained DF at approximately half the concentration of WB), further concentration of the fiber in such a product may improve its functionality with regard to reducing colon cancer risk. However, the possibility that other associated factors contributed to this response leaves the question open for further investigation. WAF appears to be a desirable food component for improving bowel health, equivalent to WB, with fermentable DF and possible associated factors capable of offering protective effects.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Goodman Fielder for the support provided for this research, Ben Scherer for the invaluable technical support and Richard Le Leu for his assistance. The statistical help of Rosalind Miller and Ray Correll of CSIRO Mathematical and Information Sciences (Urrbrae, South Australia) is acknowledged.


    FOOTNOTES
 
2 Abbreviations: AOM, azoxymethane; DF, dietary fiber; NF, no fiber; SCFA, short-chain fatty acids; WAF, wheat aleurone flour; WB, wheat bran. Back

Manuscript received May 15, 2000. Initial review completed July 20, 2000. Revision accepted October 20, 2000.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

1. DeCosse J. J., Miller H. H., Lesser M. L. Effect of wheat fiber and vitamins C and E on rectal polyps in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1989;81:1290-1297[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Freudenheim J. L., Graham S., Horvath P. J., Marshall J. R., Haughey B. P., Wilkinson G. Risks associated with source of fiber and fiber components in cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer Res 1990;50:3295-3300[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Kritchevsky D. Epidemiology of fiber, resistant starch and colorectal cancer. Eur. J. Cancer Prevent. 1995;4:345-352[Medline]

4. Cummings J. H. The Large Intestine in Nutrition and Disease 1997 Institut Danone Bruxelles, Belgium.

5. Thompson L. U. Antioxidants and hormone mediated health benefits of whole grains. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1994;34:473-497[Medline]

6. Ferguson L. R., Harris P. J. Protection against cancer by wheat bran: Role of dietary fiber and phytochemicals. Eur. J. Cancer Prevent. 1999;8:17-25[Medline]

7. McIntosh G. H., Le Leu R. K., Royle P.J.H., Young G. P. A comparative study of the influence of differing barley brans on DMH-induced intestinal tumors in male S-D rats. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 1996;11:113-119[Medline]

8. Fenech M., Noakes M., Clifton P., Topping D. Aleurone flour is a rich source of bioavailable folate in humans. J. Nutr. 1999;129:1114-1119[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Pedersen B., Knudsen K. E., Eggum B. O. Nutritive value of cereal products with emphasis on the effect of milling. World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 1989;60:1-91

10. Goldin B. R. Chemical indicators of colon tumors in animals: Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1988;279:319-333

11. Trudel J. L., Senterman M. K., Brown R. A. The fat/fiber antagonism in experimental colon carcinogenesis. Surgery 1983;94:691-696[Medline]

12. Reddy B. S. Nutritional factors and colon cancer. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1995;35:175-190[Medline]

13. McIntyre A., Gibson P. R., Young G. P. Butyrate production from dietary fiber and protection against large bowel cancer in a rat model. Gut 1993;34:386-391[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Rowland I. R. Leeds A. R. Rowland I. R. eds. Gut flora and health—past, present and future 1996 Royal Soc. Med. Press Ltd London

15. Jenab M., Thompson L. U. The influence of flaxseed and lignans on colon carcinogenesis and ß-glucuronidase activity. Carcinogenesis 1996;17:1343-1348[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Jenab M., Rickard S. E., Orcheson L. J., Thompson L. U. Flaxseed and lignans increase cecal ß-glucuronidase activity in rats. Nutr. Cancer 1999;33:154-158[Medline]

17. Young G. P., Rosen P., Levin B. Young GP Rozen P Levin B eds. Prevention and Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer 1996:14-15 WB Saunders Co Ltd London

18. Goldin B. R., Gorbach S. L. The relationship between diet and rat fecal bacterial enzymes implicated in colon cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1976;57:371-375

19. Aoe S., Oda T., Tojima T., Tanaka M., Tatsumi K., Mizutani T. Effects of rice bran hemicellulose on 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced intestinal carcinogenesis in Fischer 344 rats. Nutr. Cancer 1993;20:41-49[Medline]

20. Zoran D. L., Turner N. D., Taddeo S. S., Chapkin R. S., Lupton J. R. Wheat bran reduces tumor incidence in a rat model of colon cancer independent of effects on distal luminal butyrate concentrations. J. Nutr. 1997;127:2217-2225[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Heitman D. W., Ord V. A., Hunter K. E., Cameron I. L. Effect of dietary cellulose on cell proliferation and progression of 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats. Cancer Res 1989;49:5581-5585[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Sinkeldam E. J., Kuper C. F., Bosland M. C., Hollanders M. H., Vedder D. M. Interactive effects of dietary wheat bran and lard on N-methyl-N-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats. Cancer Res 1990;50:1092-1096[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Watanabe K., Reddy B. S., Weisburger J. H., Kritchevsky D. Effect of dietary alfalfa, pectin and wheat bran on azoxymethane or methylnitrosourea-induced intestinal carcinogenesis in F344 rats. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1979;63:151-156

24. Jacobs L. R., Lupton J. R. Relationship between colon lumen pH, cell proliferation and colon carcinogenesis in 1,2-dimethylhydrazine treated rats with high fiber diets. Cancer Res 1986;46:1727-1734[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. McIntyre A., Young G. P., Taranto T., Gibson P. R., Ward P. B. Different fibers have different regional effects on luminal content of rat colon. Gastroenterol 1991;101:1274-1281[Medline]

26. Newmark H. L., Lupton J. R. Determinants and consequences of colonic luminal pH: Implications for colon cancer. Nutr. Cancer 1990;14:161-173[Medline]

27. Bartram H.-P., Scheppach W., Schmid H., Hoffman A., et al Proliferation of human colonic mucosa as an intermediate biomarker of carcinogenesis: Effects of butyrate, deoxycholate, calcium, ammonia and pH. Cancer Res 1993;53:3283-3288[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Hambly R. J., Rumney C. J., Fletcher J.M.E., Rijken P. J., Rowland I. R. Effects of high- and low-risk diets on gut microflora-associated biomarkers of colon cancer in human flora-associated rats. Nutr. Cancer 1997;27:250-255[Medline]

29. Kulkarni N., Reddy B. S. Inhibitory effect of Bifidobacterium longum cultures on the azoxymethane-induced aberrant crypt foci formation and fecal bacterial ß-glucuronidase. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1994;207:278-283[Medline]

30. American Institute of Nutrition AIN 93 Purified diets for laboratory rodents: Final report of the American Institute of Nutrition Ad-Hoc Writing Committee on the Reformulation of the AIN-76A Rodent Diet. J. Nutr. 1993;123:1939-1951

31. Finney, D. J. (1941) On the distribution of a variate whose logarithm is normally distributed. Roy. Stat. Soc. J. Supp 7.

32. Neyman, J. & Scott, E. L. (1960) Corrections for bias introduced by a transformation of variables. Annals Maths. Statis. 31.

33. Alabaster O., Tang Z. C., Frost A., Shivapurkar N. Effect of ß-carotene and wheat bran fiber on colonic aberrant crypt and tumor formation in rats exposed to azoxymethane and high dietary fat. Carcinogenesis 1995;16:127-132[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Madar Z., Timar B., Nyska A., Zusman I. Effects of high fiber diets on pathological changes in DMH-induced rat colon cancer. Nutr. Cancer 1993;20:87-96[Medline]

35. Jacobs D. R., Maquart L., Slavin J., Kushi L. H. Whole grain intake and cancer: an expanded review and meta-analysis. Nutr. Cancer 1998;30:85-96[Medline]

36. Medina V., Alfonso J. J., Alvares A. H., Hernandez C., Gonzalez F. Sodium butyrate inhibits carcinoma development in 1,2-dimethylhydrazine induced rat. J. Parent. Enteral. Nutr. 1998;22(1):14-17[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
J. M. Clarke, D. L. Topping, A. R. Bird, G. P. Young, and L. Cobiac
Effects of high-amylose maize starch and butyrylated high-amylose maize starch on azoxymethane-induced intestinal cancer in rats
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2008; 29(11): 2190 - 2194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
R. H. Dashwood, M. C. Myzak, and E. Ho
Dietary HDAC inhibitors: time to rethink weak ligands in cancer chemoprevention?
Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2006; 27(2): 344 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. E. B. Knudsen, A. Serena, A. K. B. Kjaer, H. Jorgensen, and R. Engberg
Rye Bread Enhances the Production and Plasma Concentration of Butyrate but Not the Plasma Concentrations of Glucose and Insulin in Pigs
J. Nutr., July 1, 2005; 135(7): 1696 - 1704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
B. L. Pool-Zobel, V. Selvaraju, J. Sauer, T. Kautenburger, J. Kiefer, K. K. Richter, M. Soom, and S. Wolfl
Butyrate may enhance toxicological defence in primary, adenoma and tumor human colon cells by favourably modulating expression of glutathione S-transferases genes, an approach in nutrigenomics
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2005; 26(6): 1064 - 1076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
H. Zeng and M. Briske-Anderson
Prolonged Butyrate Treatment Inhibits the Migration and Invasion Potential of HT1080 Tumor Cells
J. Nutr., February 1, 2005; 135(2): 291 - 295.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. N. Ebert, A. Klinder, W. H.M. Peters, A. Schaferhenrich, W. Sendt, J. Scheele, and B. L. Pool-Zobel
Expression of glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) in human colon cells and inducibility of GSTM2 by butyrate
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2003; 24(10): 1637 - 1644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. Verghese, D. R. Rao, C. B. Chawan, and L. Shackelford
Dietary Inulin Suppresses Azoxymethane-Induced Preneoplastic Aberrant Crypt Foci in Mature Fisher 344 Rats
J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2804 - 2808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. J. Coleman, E. K. Landstrom, P. J. Royle, A. R. Bird, and G. H. McIntosh
A Diet Containing {alpha}-Cellulose and Fish Oil Reduces Aberrant Crypt Foci Formation and Modulates Other Possible Markers for Colon Cancer Risk in Azoxymethane-Treated Rats
J. Nutr., August 1, 2002; 132(8): 2312 - 2318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
N. J. Emenaker, G. M. Calaf, D. Cox, M. D. Basson, and N. Qureshi
Short-Chain Fatty Acids Inhibit Invasive Human Colon Cancer by Modulating uPA, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, Mutant p53, Bcl-2, Bax, p21 and PCNA Protein Expression in an In Vitro Cell Culture Model
J. Nutr., November 1, 2001; 131(11): 3041S - 3046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pointing, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McIntosh, G. H.
Right arrow Articles by Pointing, G.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2001 by American Society for Nutrition