Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feillet-Coudray, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rayssiguier, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feillet-Coudray, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rayssiguier, Y.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2000;130:2306-2311.)
© 2000 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Article

Exchangeable Magnesium Pool Masses Reflect the Magnesium Status of Rats

Christine Feillet-Coudray1, Charles Coudray, Fabienne Brûlé, Elyett Gueux, Andrzej Mazur, Steven A. Abrams* and Yves Rayssiguier

Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine d’Auvergne, Unité Maladies Métaboliques et Micronutriments, INRA, Theix, 63122 St Genès Champanelle, France and * U.S. Department of Agriculture/ARS Children’s Nutrition Research Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030

1To whom correspondence should be addressed.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A sensitive and valid marker to assess magnesium (Mg) status in humans is not available. The kinetically determined exchangeable pool masses have been used for other minerals, such as zinc and selenium, as markers of whole-body mineral status. To evaluate the validity of this relationship for Mg, we measured the exchangeable pools of Mg in rats over a range of magnesium dietary intakes. Rats weighing ~170 g were fed a control diet (500 mg Mg/kg), a marginally Mg-deficient diet (200 mg/kg) or a severely Mg-deficient diet (60 mg Mg/kg) for 2 wk. Subsequently, rats were administered an intravenous injection of 25Mg, and the plasma 25Mg disappearance curve was followed for the next 7 d. The following two methods were employed to analyze the exchangeable pools of Mg: 1) formal compartmental modeling and 2) a simplified determination of the total mass of the rapidly exchangeable Mg pool (EMgP). The mass of the three exchangeable pools (two extracellular pools and one intracellular pool) determined by compartmental analysis decreased in proportion to dietary Mg intake. EMgP, the combined pools of Mg that exchange with the plasma Mg within 48 h, decreased significantly as dietary Mg was lowered. It was positively correlated with conventional markers of Mg status (total Mg in plasma, erythrocyte and tibia Mg levels). Compartmental analysis assesses Mg exchangeable pools more accurately, but determination of EMgP is simpler and faster. Our findings demonstrate that the exchangeable pools of Mg constitute a good marker of Mg status in rats.


KEY WORDS: • magnesium • exchangeable pool • status • rats


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Magnesium (Mg), a biologically essential micronutrient, is critical for phosphorylation reactions, protein synthesis, energy transfer, and lipid and carbohydrate metabolism (Wilkinson et al. 1990Citation ). Mg deficiency leads to severe biochemical changes and neuromuscular disorders, and increasing evidence suggests that Mg deficiency as well as abnormalities in Mg metabolism may play an important role in alcoholism, diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases (Durlach 1988Citation , Rude 1998Citation ). In developed countries, marginal Mg intake may increase the prevalence of Mg deficiency (Galan et al. 1997Citation , Pennington and Schoen 1996Citation ). Conventional Mg status markers represent only the extracellular Mg level (plasma and urinary Mg). Only severe deficiencies can be detected using these markers or erythrocyte Mg as a marker of Mg status. The assessment of deep tissue Mg status is more interesting. However, although Mg tissue measurements are available for animal studies, the use of tissue markers is not practical in humans (Rude 1998Citation , Shils 1994Citation ).

The concept of the exchangeable pool, measured using either radioactive or stable isotopes, has been developed to estimate mineral bioavailability and status in humans, including growing children (Abrams and Ellis 1998Citation ). We showed recently, using severely Mg-deficient rats, that exchangeable pool measurement of Mg status can be performed in rats (Feillet-Coudray et al. 2000Citation ). The purpose of this study was to explore the exchangeable pools of Mg in rats of varied Mg status (control, marginal and severe deficiency). The following two methods were employed to analyze exchangeable pools of Mg: 1) compartmental analysis with a model described by Avioli and Berman (1966)Citation and 2) determination of the total size of the rapidly exchangeable Mg pool (EMgP), using the method of Miller et al. (1994)Citation .


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Reagents and equipment.

Enriched Mg (200 mg; 96.7% 25Mg, 2.2% 24Mg and 1.1% 26Mg) in the oxide form, was obtained from Chemagas (Paris, France). Suprapure HNO3, suprapure H2O2, suprapure HCl, lanthanum oxide and standard solutions of Mg (1 g/L) were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). All other chemicals were of the highest quality available, and demineralized water was used throughout. The Mg isotope-ratio measurements were performed using an inductively coupled plasma/mass spectrometry (ICP/MS) instrument (Plasma Quad-II System, Fisons Instruments, Manchester, UK), equipped with a Meinhard nebulizer. An atomic absorption spectrometer, Perkin Elmer 560 (Perkin Elmer, St-Quentin en Yvelines, France), was used for total Mg measurements.

Animals and diets.

Male Wistar rats (IFFA-CREDO, L’Arbresle, France) weighing ~170 g were used. They were housed under conditions of constant temperature (20–22°C), humidity (45–50%) and a standard dark cycle (2000–0800 h). Our institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were observed.

Rats were assigned randomly to three groups of 20. For 2 wk, each was fed a semipurified diet containing 500 mg Mg/kg (control group), 200 mg Mg/kg (marginally Mg-deficient group) or 60 mg Mg/kg (Mg-deficient group) (Rock et al. 1995Citation ). All rats had free access to distilled water and food. The semipurified diets contained the following (g/kg): casein 200, starch 650, corn oil 50, alphacel (cellulose) 50, DL-methionine 3, choline bitartrate 2, modified AIN-76 mineral mix 35, AIN-76A vitamin mix 10 (ICN Biomedicals, Orsay, France) (AIN 1977Citation ). The Mg level in the three experimental diets was checked by flame atomic absorption spectrometric analysis (Perkin Elmer 560, St-Quentin en Yvelines, France).

Preparation of stable isotope solution.

Enriched Mg (200 mg; or 328 mg of MgO) was moistened with 2 mL of demineralized water; 2 mL of 12 mol/L HCl (suprapure) was added to transform the oxide into the soluble chloride of Mg. The solution was then neutralized with 2 mL of NaOH (1 mol/L) and 25 mL of NaHCO3 (1.67 mol/L), and adjusted to 100 mL with physiologic solution (NaCl, 9 g/L). The pH and the osmolarity of the obtained solution were 7.0 and 320 mOs, respectively. The concentration of Mg in this solution was 2 g/L. This solution was then filtered (0.45 µm) and distributed into seven bottles of 14–15 mL each. Total Mg concentration and isotope ratio were checked before use.

Isotope injection and sampling.

After 2 wk of consuming the experimental diets, each rat was administered an intravenous injection of 1.37 mg 25Mg. Because the number of blood samples that can be obtained from each rat is limited, it was necessary to use 20 rats/group. Half of each group was sampled at the following times: 15, 30, 60, 90 min and 2, 3, 4, and 6 h after 25Mg injection (short-term kinetics). The other half of each group was sampled at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7 d after 25Mg injection (long-term kinetics). Rats in both groups were anesthetized at each time point and blood (0.5 mL) was collected by a catheter in the left carotid for the short-term kinetic and from the retroorbital sinus for the long-term kinetic. Blood samples were centrifuged (2500 g x 15 min) and the plasma was separated. Erythrocytes were collected at 6 h and 7 d, twice washed with saline solution and hemolized. The anesthetized rats were then killed, and the tibiae were collected at the end of the long-term kinetics for total Mg determination.

Analysis.

The 25Mg concentration of plasma samples was determined by ICP/MS (PlasmaQuad II systems) (Coudray et al. 1997Citation ). Before analysis, the plasma was diluted in 0.16 mol/L HNO3; natural Mg and beryllium were used as external and internal standards, respectively. Total Mg concentrations in the analyzed samples were ~50 µg/L. Within- and between-run percentage residual standard deviations were as follows: 0.45 and 0.71% for 25Mg/26Mg for Mg standard solution, respectively, and 0.58 and 0.86%, respectively, for plasma dilution.

For total Mg determination, plasma and hemolized erythrocytes were simply diluted in 1 g/L lanthanum chloride. For tibia analysis, the bone was first dried, dry-ashed, dissolved with HNO3 and H2O2 and heated at 110°C, and then dried down. The dry residue was then taken up with concentrated HNO3 and adequately diluted in 1 g/L of lanthanum chloride. Mg concentration was determined by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (Perkin Elmer 560) at 285 nm. Within- and between-run percentage residual standard deviations were as follows: 2.5 and 3.71% for Mg standard solution, 3.2 and 5.1% for plasma Mg, 3.7 and 5.6% for erythrocyte hemolysate Mg and 3.5% and 4.9%, respectively, for bone Mg measurements.

Kinetic analysis.

Magnesium kinetics were determined using a multicompartmental model as described by Avioli and Berman (1966)Citation and Sojka et al. (1997)Citation . A schematic of the model is shown in Figure 1Citation . Compartmental modeling of the data was performed with the aid of the SAAM II (Stimulation, Analysis, and Modeling) program (SAAM Institute, Seattle, WA) (Barrett et al. 1998Citation ). Plasma data were expressed as tracer/tracee, with tracer = (25Mg from the injection) and tracee = (Mg total - 25Mg from the injection). The mean values (n = 8) at each sampling time were used in the model development because of the use of different rats for the short and long kinetic experiments. The mass of the different pools (M1, M2, M3), the fractional transport rate [exchange constant between pools (k1,2; k2,1; k1,3; k3,1) and the irreversible loss of Mg from pool 3 (k 0,3)] were determined from the model using the SAAM II program. Irreversible loss from pool 1 (k 0,1) was approximated using the urinary excretion values obtained from previous studies in rats subjected to the same experimental conditions in our laboratory (data not shown). Endogenous fecal losses were not taken into account in this calculation.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Three-compartment model of Mg kinetics from Avioli and Berman (1966)Citation . Arrows represent intercompartmental movements of the cation, determined by appropriate rate constants and irreversible loss.

 
Exchangeable Mg pool (EMgP).

We evaluated EMgP size according to the method of Miller et al. (1994)Citation developed for zinc metabolism. EMgP is the system of pools that exchange with the plasma at a rate fast enough to essentially intermix completely within a 48-h period. EMgP size is equivalent to the mass of isotope administered divided by the tracer/tracee value at the y-intercept of the linear regression of a semilog plot of the plasma tracer/tracee data between d 3 and 7 (Fig. 2Citation ).



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Method to calculate exchangeable Mg pool (EMgP). EMgP size is equivalent to the mass of isotope administered divided by the tracer/tracee value at the y-intercept of the linear regression of a semilog plot of the plasma tracer/tracee data between d 3 and 7, with tracer = (25Mg from the injection) and tracee = (Mg total - 25Mg from the injection).

 
Statistical analysis.

Results were expressed as means ± SD. Statistical analyses were based on one-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey-Kramer multiple comparisons test and on Spearman’s correlation coefficients. The limit of statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad program (V3.00, GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Characteristics of the rats and conventional biomarkers of Mg.

The weight of rats fed the Mg-deficient diet was significantly less than that of those fed the control diet (Table 1Citation ). However, the weight of the marginally Mg-deficient group was not significantly different from that of the other groups. Conventional Mg markers (Mg concentration in plasma, erythrocytes and tibia) were significantly lower in the Mg-deficient group compared with the control group. In the marginally Mg-deficient rats, Mg concentrations in plasma and in tibia were significantly lower than those observed in the controls. However, the erythrocyte Mg concentration did not differ between marginally Mg-deficient and control rats.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristics of the rats fed diets containing differing levels of Mg for 2 wk1

 
Compartmental model of Mg metabolism.

Semilogarithmic plots of the model fit to plasma data for control, marginally Mg-deficient and Mg-deficient rats are shown in Figure 3Citation . The pattern of the curve was similar in appearance for the three experimental groups, showing a rapid disappearance of tracer during the first 10 h, followed by a slow decline that extended through at least 170 h. However, all tracer/tracee values were greater for Mg-deficient rats compared with control rats and the marginally Mg-deficient group. Tracer/tracee values were also higher for marginally Mg-deficient rats compared with control rats.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Semilogarithmic plot of the model fit to plasma data for control rats (500 mg Mg/kg), marginally Mg-deficient (200 mg Mg/kg) and Mg-deficient rats (60 mg Mg/kg). The mean values (n = 8) at each sampling time were used in the model development because of the use of different rats for the short and long kinetic experiments. Plasma data were expressed as tracer/tracee. Compartmental modeling of the data was performed with the aid of the Stimulation, Analysis, and Modeling (SAAM II) program (SAAM Institute, Seattle, WA) (Barrett et al. 1998Citation ).

 
Pools 1 and 2 are composed primarily of extracellular fluid, whereas pool 3 represents intracellular Mg (Avioli and Berman 1966Citation ). Mg-deficient rats had smaller pool masses compared with control rats, and marginally Mg-deficient rats had intermediate masses (Table 2Citation ). Pool 3 accounted for 89% of total exchangeable Mg in control rats, for 91% in marginally Mg-deficient rats and for 88% in Mg-deficient rats. In the Mg-deficient group, the masses of pools 1, 2 and 3 were 40, 32 and 40% lower, respectively, than those of control group, and in the marginally Mg-deficient group the masses were 32, 29 and 16% lower, respectively. M3 was positively correlated with plasma Mg (Table 3Citation ). The correlation tended to be significant (P = 0.07) between M3 and tibia Mg. No correlation was obtained for M1 and M2 with plasma, erythrocytes or tibia Mg levels.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Calculated tricompartmental model parameters of rats fed a control diet, marginally Mg-deficient diet or a Mg-deficient diet1

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Correlation between pool sizes and conventional markers of Mg status in rats fed a control diet, marginally Mg-deficient diet or Mg-deficient diet1

 
The fractional transport rate of Mg from pool 1 to pool 3 increased as the Mg level in the diet decreased (Table 2)Citation . Moreover, irreversible loss from pool 1 (calculated from a previous experiment, results not published) was ~89% lower in Mg-deficient rats and 50% lower in the marginally Mg-deficient group than in control rats. A slight decrease was observed for irreversible loss from pool 3 as the Mg level in the diet decreased.

EMgP and classical markers of Mg status.

EMgP was significantly different among the experimental groups (Table 2)Citation . It decreased with dietary Mg restriction. EMgP was positively correlated with plasma Mg concentration, erythrocyte Mg concentration and tibia Mg concentration on an individual animal basis (Table 3)Citation . It was positively correlated with plasma Mg and tended to be correlated with tibia Mg (P = 0.06) on a mean data basis. Moreover, EMgP was positively correlated with M3 (r = 0.9998, P < 0.05).

Variations of conventional markers of Mg status and pool sizes with dietary Mg intake.

The relationships between conventional markers of Mg status and pool sizes with dietary Mg intake relative values (the value 1 was given to the control group) were calculated for each variable. As expected, plasma Mg decreased the most as dietary Mg decreased (Fig. 4Citation ). EMgP and M3 decreased similarly to tibia Mg. The variation of erythrocyte Mg with dietary Mg was of lower magnitude and was less sensitive.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Variations of conventional markers of Mg status (A) and pool sizes (B) with Mg dietary intake in control rats (500 mg Mg/kg), marginally Mg-deficient (200 mg Mg/kg) and Mg-deficient rats (60 mg Mg/kg). M1, M2 and M3 are the masses of the different exchangeable pools and were determined from the model of Avioli and Berman (1966)Citation using the Simulation, Analysis, and Modeling Software (SAAM II) program. The exchangeable Mg pool (EMgP) is the total mass of the rapidly exchangeable pool; its size is equivalent to the mass of isotope administered divided by the tracer/tracee value at the y-intercept of the linear regression of a semilog plot of the plasma tracer/tracee data between d 3 and 7. Relative value: the value 1 was given to the control group.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Despite the importance of Mg status in nutrition and health, there is no sensitive and specific marker with which to assess that status in humans. In theory, determination of the exchangeable pools of Mg could be used to estimate Mg tissue status. To assess whether this concept is valid, we utilized rats to evaluate the relationship between the exchangeable pools of Mg and Mg dietary status. We found that these were closely related; therefore, isotopic assessment of magnesium pool masses may represent a practical method for determining whole-body Mg status.

Various biochemical markers of Mg status are available. However, they have some important limitations. Serum Mg represents <1% of total body Mg; thus, the serum Mg concentration may not reflect intracellular magnesium status. Because ionized Mg is physiologically active, the measurement of ionized Mg would be useful. Recently, Mg ion-selective electrodes have become available. However, it has been demonstrated that ionized Mg concentration measured in serum depends on the analyzer used (Huijgen et al. 1999Citation ). Therefore, improvements are still necessary. Routine determinations of the Mg in the blood constituents (erythrocytes and peripheral lymphocytes) (Mazur et al. 1997Citation ) are inconsistently correlated with each other, and may vary in different physiologic and pathologic conditions (Elin 1991Citation ). The parenteral Mg load test has been suggested as a diagnostic test for Mg status. This test is based on the fact that the normal kidney regulates the body stores of Mg, excreting an excess in normal subjects and retaining the mineral in deficient subjects. However, applied tests vary among laboratories and a standardized procedure is not available (Mazur et al. 1997Citation ). Skeletal muscle and bone biopsies are invasive markers, they are time consuming, and there is a poor correlation between these two methods (Alfrey and Miller 1973Citation ). Thus, there is a pressing need to develop additional and potentially more suitable methods for assessment of Mg tissue status. The concept of the exchangeable pool of a given element has been developed to estimate trace element status and has been validated for selenium (Janghorbani 1990Citation ) and zinc (Fairweather-Tait et al. 1993Citation , Lowe et al. 1991Citation ). In our initial studies in rats, we evaluated the exchangeable pool in severely Mg-deficient rats (Feillet-Coudray et al. 2000Citation ). We observed alterations in both pool masses and turnover rates with Mg deficiency.

In this study, we found that plasma, erythrocyte and tibia Mg concentrations were considerably lower in Mg-deficient rats compared with control rats. These conventional markers of Mg status confirmed a severe Mg deficiency in the Mg-deficient rats. In marginally Mg-deficient rats, plasma and tibia Mg concentrations were also significantly decreased, whereas erythrocyte Mg concentrations were not different from control levels. Thus, erythrocyte Mg was not sensitive enough to detect a marginal Mg deficiency. Moreover, most studies have shown no correlation between erythrocyte Mg concentration and other tissue pools of Mg (Elin 1989Citation ); an apparent genetic regulation of erythrocyte Mg may be a factor in this lack of correlation (Henrotte 1982Citation ).

The exchangeable pools of Mg can be measured according to the model of Avioli and Berman (1966)Citation . Using 28Mg as a tracer, these authors first proposed a multicompartmental model of exchangeable magnesium. However, the short half-life of 28Mg (21.3 h) did not allow the determination of turnover rates of Mg in the slowly exchangeable pool. Moreover, 28Mg tracer studies had been limited as a result of their apparent inability to identify Mg-deficient conditions clinically (Wallach 1987Citation ). Recently, with improvements in analytical techniques, the use of the Mg stable isotopes, 25Mg and 26Mg, has been developed. The multicompartmental model described by Avioli and Berman (1966)Citation was validated by Sojka et al. (1997)Citation and Abrams and Ellis (1998)Citation using stable isotopes of Mg in children and adolescents. This technique has the disadvantage of requiring a large number of blood samples but allows accurate characterization of exchangeable pools and turnover rates. In this model, there are three exchangeable Mg pools with varied rates of turnover. In fact, the plasma concentration of 25Mg fit a sum of three exponentials (Avioli and Berman 1966Citation ). Pools 1 and 2 represent pools with a relatively fast turnover. Together, these pools approximate extracellular fluid distribution. Avioli and Berman (1966)Citation demonstrated in several individual studies that plasma 28Mg consisted of at least two compartments because the integral of the plasma curve was not proportional to the cumulative urine curve. Pool 3 is an intracellular pool containing >70% of the exchanging Mg, with a turnover one half that of the most rapid pool. There is also a pool 5, which is a loss pathway representing deposition into tissues (Sojka et al. 1997Citation ).

We demonstrated that the sizes of pools 1, 2 and 3 decreased in proportion to Mg deficiency. Unfortunately, statistical analysis was not performed because two groups of rats were used (short kinetic and long kinetic) as a result of limitations on venesection. Determination of exchangeable pool sizes of Mg does appear sufficiently sensitive to assess Mg status in either marginal or severe Mg deficiency. The size of the exchangeable pools better reflects the state of Mg storage in the body than do plasma, erythrocyte and tibia levels of Mg. Indeed, the third exchangeable pool of Mg represents the Mg level in deep tissue, which the conventional markers of Mg cannot measure. The assessment of this deep body Mg is important to gain a better understanding of Mg metabolism and to link to it the effect of Mg intake and status. The fractional transport rate of Mg from pool 1 to pool 3 increased with marginal and severe Mg deficiency, suggesting a higher avidity of compartment 3 for Mg, which may prevent excessive depletion of intracellular Mg. On the other hand, the fractional transport rate from pool 3 to pool 1 was not modified by Mg deficiency. Moreover, the irreversible loss from pool 1 decreased with marginal and severe Mg deficiency. This irreversible loss accounts in large part for fecal and urinary excretions of Mg. This is in agreement with the compensatory mechanism occurring in the kidney, in the case of Mg deficiency, in which Mg is conserved when Mg status is low, resulting in a low urinary excretion of Mg.

EMgP decreased significantly as Mg was lowered in the diet. EMgP is defined as the combined pools of Mg that exchange with the plasma Mg within 48 h. This method requires determination of the coefficient of the simple exponential decay function fitting plasma enrichment data between 3 and 7 d after administration of the Mg stable isotope tracer (Miller et al. 1994Citation ). Collection of plasma samples starting at day 3 is more feasible than the rapid early sampling required for compartmental analysis, and analysis of the data is easier and faster. However, this method of determining the size of EMgP is accurate only to the extent that the following two conditions are met: 1) the loss of tracer from EMgP occurs at a monoexponential rate from the moment of tracer administration to the end of the measurement period; and 2) the tracer is homogeneously mixed throughout the EMgP during the measurement period (Miller et al. 1994Citation ). Because the initial rapid loss of tracer from plasma is not accounted for by extrapolation of the monoexponential loss rate during the measurement period, and because it is extremely unlikely that the tracer exists at equal concentrations in all compartments of the EMgP at any time, there are two potential sources of error inherent in this method (Miller et al. 1994Citation ), which result in an overestimation of EMgP size. In fact, the Mg exchangeable pool size is overestimated with the method of Miller by ~25% for control and marginally deficient rats. Nevertheless the overestimation is only 5% for Mg-deficient rats.

We also showed that EMgP is positively correlated with conventional markers of Mg status on an individual animal basis. The higher correlation was obtained with the tibia Mg concentration. Moreover, sensitivity to dietary Mg variation was the same for EMgP and tibia Mg concentration. This is an important result, because tibia Mg concentration is an excellent tissue marker that is not accessible in humans. Moreover, EMgP is at least as sensitive as M3 to dietary Mg variation.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the exchangeable pools of Mg represent a good marker of Mg status in rats. In fact, Mg exchangeable pool sizes vary with dietary Mg intake and are reduced by restriction of dietary Mg. M3 is adequate to reveal differences that depend on Mg status and represents the deep tissue Mg level, which conventional markers of Mg cannot measure. Compartmental modeling of Mg metabolism allows accurate characterization of exchangeable pools and turnover rates; however, its determination necessitates numerous blood samples. EMgP determination is a simple and alternative method and permits rapid determination of Mg status. Studies are now warranted to validate the utilization of the Mg exchangeable pool concept as a Mg status biomarker in humans.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank D. Pépin (Faculté de Pharmacie, Université d’ Auvergne) and V. Ducros (Center Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble) for their contribution to this study. They also thank C. Lab and J. C. Tressol for technical assistance.

Manuscript received March 8, 2000. Initial review completed March 24, 2000. Revision accepted April 25, 2000.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

1. Abrams S. A., Ellis K. J. Multicompartmental analysis of magnesium and calcium kinetics during growth: relationships with body composition. Magnes. Res. 1998;4:307-313

2. Alfrey A. C., Miller N. L. Bone magnesium pools in uremia. J. Clin. Investig. 1973;52:3019-3027

3. American Institute of Nutrition Report of the American Institute of Nutrition ad hoc committee on standards for nutritional studies. J. Nutr. 1977;107:1340-1348

4. Avioli L. V., Berman M. Mg28 kinetics in man. J. Appl. Physiol. 1966;21:1688-1694[Free Full Text]

5. Barrett P. H., Bell B. M., Cobelli C., Golde H., Schumitzky A., Vicini P., Foster D. M. SAAM II: Simulation, Analysis, and Modeling Software for tracer and pharmacokinetic studies. Metabolism 1998;47:484-492[Medline]

6. Coudray C., Pepin D., Tressol J. C., Bellanger J., Rayssiguier Y. Study of magnesium bioavailability using stable isotopes and the inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry technique in the rat: single and double labelling approaches. Br. J. Nutr. 1997;77:957-970[Medline]

7. Durlach J. Durlach J. eds. Magnesium in Clinical Practice 1988:1-360 John Libbey London, UK.

8. Elin R. J. Assessment of magnesium status. Itokawa Y. Durlach I. eds. Magnesium in Health and Disease 1989:137-146 John Libbey London, UK.

9. Elin R. J. Laboratory tests for the assessment of magnesium status in humans. Magnes. Trace Elem. 1991;10:172-181[Medline]

10. Fairweather-Tait S. J., Jackson M. J., Fox T. E., Wharf S. G., Eagles J., Croghan P. C. The measurement of exchangeable pools of zinc using the stable isotope 70Zn. Br. J. Nutr. 1993;70:221-234[Medline]

11. Feillet-Coudray C., Coudray C., Gueux E., Mazur A., Abrams S. A., Rayssiguier Y. Compartmental analysis of magnesium kinetics in Mg-sufficient and Mg-deficient rats. Metabolism 2000;49:1-5

12. Galan P., Preziosi P., Durlach V., Valeix P., Ribas L., Bouzid D., Favier A., Hercberg S. Dietary magnesium intake in a French adult population. Magnes. Res. 1997;10:321-328[Medline]

13. Henrotte J. G. Genetic regulation of red blood cell magnesium content and major histocompatibility complex. Magnesium 1982;1:69-80

14. Huijgen H. J., Sanders R., Cecco S. A., Rehak N. N., Sanders G. T., Elin R. J. Serum ionized magnesium: comparison of results obtained with three ion-selective analyzers. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 1999;37:465-470[Medline]

15. Janghorbani M., Martin R. F., Kasper L. J., Sun X. F., Young V. R. The selenite-exchangeable metabolic pool in humans: a new concept for the assessment of selenium status. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1990;51:670-677[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Lowe N. M., Bremner I., Jackson M. J. Plasma 65Zn kinetics in the rat. Br. J. Nutr. 1991;65:445-455[Medline]

17. Mazur A., Felgines C., Feillet C., Boirie Y., Bellanger J., Beaufrère B., Gueux E., Rock E., Rayssiguier Y. Magnesium loading test in the assessment of magnesium status in healthy French subjects. Magnes. Res. 1997;10:59-64[Medline]

18. Miller L. V., Hambidge K. M., Naake V. L., Hong Z., Westcott J. L., Fennessey P. V. Size of the zinc pools that exchange rapidly with plasma zinc in humans: alternative techniques for measuring and relation to dietary zinc intake. J. Nutr. 1994;124:268-276

19. Pennington J. A., Schoen S. A. Total diet study: estimated dietary intakes of nutritional elements, 1982–1991. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 1996;66:350-362[Medline]

20. Rock E., Astier C., Lab C., Vignon X., Gueux E., Motta C., Rayssiguier Y. Dietary magnesium deficiency in rats enhances free radical production in skeletal muscle. J. Nutr. 1995;125:5.1205-1210

21. Rude R. K. Clinical review. Magnesium deficiency: a cause of heterogeneous disease in humans. J. Bone Miner. Res. 1998;13:749-758[Medline]

22. Shils M. E. Magnesium. Shils M. E. Olson J. A. Shike M. eds. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease 1994:164-184 Lea & Febiger Philadelphia, PA.

23. Sojka J., Wastney M., Abrams S., Lewis S. F., Martin B., Weaver C., Peacock M. Magnesium kinetics in adolescent girls determined using stable isotopes: effects of high and low calcium intake. Am. J. Physiol. 1997;273:R710-R715[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Wallach S. Magnesium exchangeability and bioavailability in magnesium deficiency. Altura B. M. Durlach J. Seelig M. S. eds. Magnesium in Cellular Processes and Medicine 1987:27-49 Karger Basel, Switzerland.

25. Wilkinson S. R., Welch R. M., Mayland H. F., Grunes D. L. Magnesium in plants: uptake, distribution, function and utilization by man and animals. Sigel H. Sigel A. eds. Compendium of Magnesium and Its Role in Biology, Nutrition and Physiology 1990:33-56 Marcel Dekker New York, NY.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. Feillet-Coudray, C. Coudray, E. Gueux, A. Mazur, and Y. Rayssiguier
A New In Vitro Blood Load Test Using a Magnesium Stable Isotope for Assessment of Magnesium Status
J. Nutr., April 1, 2003; 133(4): 1220 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. Coudray, C. Feillet-Coudray, D. Grizard, J. C. Tressol, E. Gueux, and Y. Rayssiguier
Fractional Intestinal Absorption of Magnesium Is Directly Proportional to Dietary Magnesium Intake in Rats
J. Nutr., July 1, 2002; 132(7): 2043 - 2047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. Feillet-Coudray, C. Coudray, J.-C. Tressol, D. Pepin, A. Mazur, S. A Abrams, and Y. Rayssiguier
Exchangeable magnesium pool masses in healthy women: effects of magnesium supplementation
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2002; 75(1): 72 - 78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Feillet-Coudray, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rayssiguier, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Feillet-Coudray, C.
Right arrow Articles by Rayssiguier, Y.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2000 by American Society for Nutrition