![]() |
|
|
Swiss Federal Station for Animal Production, Posieux, 1725 Switzerland
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: sows conjugated linoleic acids gestation and lactation milk adipose tissue
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Additionally, consumption of CLA during lactation has been shown to
increase the concentration of CLA in the rats milk (Chin et al. 1994
). In dairy cows, infusion of CLA into the abomasum
altered milk fatty acid composition and markedly depressed the total
content and yield of milk fat (Chouinard et al. 1999
,
Loor and Herbein 1998
). Compared with ruminants, sows
milk is devoid of short-chain fatty acids and CLA; instead, it is
dominated by oleic, palmitic and linoleic acids (Darragh and Moughan 1998
, Jahreis et al. 1999
). The levels
of those fatty acids have been shown to be affected most by dietary CLA
(Loor and Herbein 1998
).
Because the fatty acid composition of colostral and mature milk depends
on the type of fat supplied by the diet (Pettersen and Opstvedt 1991
) and in view of the results from studies in cows and rats,
it seems likely that supplementing the sow diet with CLA may result in
CLA enrichment of sows milk. Because milk is the sole or main source
of nutrients for piglets during the first 24 wk of life, it is
important that the nutrients in milk meet the substantial requirements
for structural and functional development of the rapidly growing
neonate. Essential fatty acids (EFA) of the (n-3) and (n-6) families
are particularly important for the development of the brain and retina
and are integral constituents of the central nervous system
(Alessandri et al. 1998
, Goustard et al. 1999
). Because of the many similarities between pigs and humans
(Purvis et al. 1982
), results of dietary supplementation
with CLA in sows may serve as a model for the effects of CLA
supplementation on human milk composition. Therefore, the objectives of
this study were to determine the influence of a commercial source of
CLA supplied in the gestation and lactation period on the incorporation
rate into adipose tissue during pregnancy and into milk fat during
lactation.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Two basal gestation and lactation diets were formulated; they were
supplemented with either a linoleic acid (LA)- or CLA- enriched oil (2
g/100 g diet) (Table 1
). A commercial source of CLA was used to supplement the diet
(SELIN-CLA, Grünau Jllertissen GmbH, Germany). The LA was derived
from sunflower oil and served as the source material to produce CLA.
The basal diets contained no fat supplements and were formulated to
meet Swiss requirements for sows during gestation and lactation
(Boltshauser et al. 1993
).
|
Measurements and sampling.
A shot-biopsy was taken from the backfat (5 cm caudal to the last rib and also 5 cm off the midline) on d 7 and 97 of gestation. Biopsies were frozen immediately and stored at -20°C. On d 2 (colostrum), 9, 16 and 23 (mature milk) after farrowing, milk samples were collected. The milk collections took place at 1100 h for sows who farrowed in the morning or at 1500 h for those who farrowed in the afternoon. Milk (10 mL) was obtained by milking several udders after milk let-down was induced by intramuscular injection of 3 mL oxytocin (Oxytocin-20, Graeub, Switzerland). Samples were frozen immediately for lipid extraction and fatty acid analysis.
Sample analysis.
Milk and adipose tissue lipids were extracted as described by
Winter (1963)
with minor modifications. Briefly, 5 g of milk and 300 mg of adipose tissue were homogenized in 1 mL of
triundecanine (internal standard) and 60 mL of dichloromethane/methanol
(1:2, v/v) for 30 s. After 15 min, the filtered sample was added
to 1 mL MgCl2 (20 g/L) and 20 mL water. The organic phase
containing the lipid extract was removed and reduced in volume under
vacuum (550 x 102 Pa at 40°C). The fatty acid
methyl esters (FAME) were prepared by transesterification by methanolic
sodium hydroxide and boron trifluoride according to the method of
Metcalfe and Smith (1961)
. The FAME were determined
using a gas chromatograph (HP 5860 A GC; Hewlett-Packard, Urdora,
Switzerland), equipped with a flame ionization detector and separated
on a 30 m x 0.32 mm i. d. Supelcowax TM 10 fused-silica
capillary column (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA). The oven temperature was as
follows: initial temperature 170°C for 1 min; raised to 250°C at
2.5°C/min; 250°C held for 7 min. The detection temperature was at
250°C and split at 250°C.
From the same lipid extract CLA-FAME were separated on the same gas chromatograph mentioned above but using different oven temperatures, i.e., initial temperature 200°C for 15 min; raised to 250°C with 20°C/min; 250°C held for 10 min. The detection temperature was at 250°C and split at 250°C. CLA standards (Matreya, Pleasant Gap, PA) and CRM 163 (Commission of the European Communities, Community Bureau of Reference, Brussels, Belgium) were used to validate the measurements. The following CLA isomers were measured: cis9,trans11 (c9,t11)-, trans10,cis12 (t10,c12)-, cis9,cis11 (c9,c11)- and cis10,cis12 (c10,c12)-18:2. The trans9,trans11 (t9,t11) and trans10,trans12 (t10,t12)-18:2 could not be separated and are reported as the sum of both isomers.
Statistical analysis.
The fatty acid profile of the adipose tissue samples (biopsies) and
milk were analyzed with the PROC MIXED procedure of SAS (1998)
with treatment and time as fixed effects and block
(block = sows body weight at mating) as random factor
(Littell et al. 1998
). Data for preweaning growth were
analyzed by the General Linear Models procedure of SAS (1998)
with treatment as fixed effect and block as random
factor. Differences with probability levels of P
0.05 were considered significant. Data are reported as least-square
means ± SEM.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
There were no significant differences in feed consumption, weight gain (gestation) or weight loss (lactation) by sows among treatment groups (data not shown). Similarly, pig birth weights (1.56, 1.58 ± 0.13kg; P = 0.87, for LA and CLA groups, respectively) and weaning weights (7.91, 8.26 ± 0.20 kg; P = 0.32, for LA and CLA groups, respectively) did not differ between treatments.
Fatty acid composition of the backfat.
The fatty acid profile of the backfat biopsies at d 7 and 97 of
gestation are presented in Table 3
. The content of the main fatty acids at d 7 of gestation did not differ
between treatments. Inclusion of the CLA in the gestation diet
increased the level of myristic acid (14:0), palmitic acid and total
SFA [treatment (T) x gestation day (D) interaction: P
0.01 for each], whereas that of oleic acid and total
monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) (T x D interaction:
P
0.02 for each) were decreased. The eicosanoic
(20:0), palmitoleic [16:1(n-7)] and eicosenoic acid [20:1(n-9)]
levels were not affected by dietary CLA. At d 97 of gestation, the
contents of linoleic and arachidonic acid [(20:4(n-6)] were
significantly greater in the LA than in the CLA group (T x D
interaction: P
0.05 for each), and
-linolenic
acid [18:3(n-3)] concentration tended to be lower only in the CLA
group (T x D interaction: P = 0.07).
|
Fatty acid composition of colostrum and mature milk.
Regardless of dietary treatment, mature milk had markedly more SFA and
less polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) compared with colostrum
[lactation week (W) effect: P < 0.01 for each],
whereas total MUFA level did not differ between colostral and mature
milk (W effect: P = 0.20; Table 4
). The presence of CLA in the lactation diet increased the stearic and
eicosenoic acid contents (T effect: P
0.04 for each)
whereas those of linoleic and arachidonic acid were lower in the
colostrum and mature milk (T effect: P < 0.01 for
each); myristic acid was increased and palmitoleic acid was lower only
in the mature milk (T x W effect: P
0.04 for
each). The levels of palmitic, oleic acid and
-linolenic acids did
not differ between the two treatment groups, but were lower in the
mature milk than in the colostrum (W effect: P < 0.01
for each).
|
0.02 for
each), whereas that of the c9,c11 and
t10,c12 was lower than in the colostrum (W
effect: P < 0.01 for each). The
c10,c12 isomer was present in the colostrum, but
not in the mature milk. | DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In this study, the fatty acid profile of backfat tissue of pregnant
sows was not affected after a 90 d of supplementation with a
linoleic acidrich dietary fat (Table 3)
, except for a slight increase
in the PUFA content, which was related predominantly to the high
linoleic acid content of the diet. The reason for the lack of effect
over time seen in the LA group can be attributed to the similar fatty
acid profile of the gestation and lactation diets offered to all sows
before their assignment to this experiment. Therefore, no change in the
fatty acid profile of the backfat lipid was anticipated because the
backfat tissue composition already reflected the diet; even with tissue
turnover, it continued to reflect the diet throughout this study. On
the contrary, dietary CLA supply in the gestation period markedly
increased myristic, palmitic and total SFA content of the backfat
lipid, but decreased that of oleic acid and total MUFA (Table 3)
. The
level of total SFA was likely determined by the rate of the de novo
synthesis because the SFA content of the CLA and LA gestation diets was
similar, differing by only 2 g/100 g total fatty acids.
Palmitoleic and oleic acid originate from uptake of dietary lipid and
desaturation from a portion of the respective saturated fatty acids,
which is regulated by the fatty acyl-CoA
9-desaturase complex. The palmitoleic to
palmitic acid [16:1(n-7)/16:0] ratio in the adipose tissue of the CLA
group decreased from d 7 (0.10) to 97 (0.05) of gestation and was
comparable to the dietary ratio (0.05), implying that the ratio was
dictated primarily by the dietary lipids. On the contrary, in the LA
group, the ratio did not change over the experimental period in the
backfat (0.10) and was higher than in the diet (0.04), suggesting an
increased desaturation activity. The oleic to stearic acid
[18:1(n-9)/18:0] ratio in the adipose tissue of both treatments was
lower than in the diet. In the LA group, the ratio was virtually
identical at d 7 and 97 of gestation, but decreased over time from 2.97
to 2.01 in the CLA group. These findings might indicate that the
presence of CLA in the diet depressed synthesis of oleic acid in the
adipose tissue lipids, possibly by decreasing stearoyl-CoA
desaturase activity.
In the backfat tissue of the LA group, CLA isomers were not detected on
either d 7 or 97 of gestation, confirming results of earlier studies
with growing finishing pigs that tissue is devoid of CLA if not
supplied by the diet (Kramer et al. 1998
). Conversely,
in the CLA group at d 97 of gestation, all measured isomers could be
detected in the adipose tissue. To estimate the utilization of CLA
isomers for lipid synthesis in the adipose tissue, we calculated a
discrimination factor (CLA isomers to PUFA ratio in the adipose tissue
as a percentage of the ratio in the diet) as proposed by
Pettersen and Opstvedt (1991)
for trans fatty
acids. The discrimination factors were similar for the
c9,c11 (0.42), t10,c12
(0.41) and t9,t11/t10,t12
(0.41) CLA isomers (Table 5
). By contrast, the c9,t11 (0.52) isomer was
incorporated into the adipose tissue at a higher level.
|
As reported in previous studies (Fritsche et al. 1993
,
Hartmann and Holmes 1989
, Pettersen and Opstvedt 1991
), regardless of diet, colostrum had a higher percentage of
PUFA and lower level of SFA than mature milk. However, in contrast to
these earlier studies, the MUFA level of the colostrum was not
different from that of mature milk. The distinct difference between the
treatments in the total SFA content of colostral and mature milk was
due mainly to the markedly higher stearic acid content in the CLA
compared with the LA group. The effect was independent of lactation
stage.
When sows are not in a negative energy balance, the fatty acids in the
milk are derived from the following two sources: 1) the
blood lipids, both endogenous and dietary fatty acids, and
2) de novo synthesis in the mammary glands (Boyd and Kensinger 1998
). As reviewed by Hartmann and Holmes (1989)
, most of the fatty acids in the colostral and mature
milk lipids are found to reflect closely those of blood
triacylglycerols, which in turn are influenced by the type of fat
ingested by the sow. The fatty acid profile of the milk lipids
suggested an increased synthesis of stearic acid by elongation from
palmitic acid and/or by de novo synthesis in the mammary gland of the
CLA-fed sows because dietary fat intake, and consequently intake of
the respective fatty acids, in the lactation period was similar for
both groups. In addition, the palmitoleic to palmitic acid and oleic to
stearic acid ratios were lower in the CLA group compared with the LA
group and corroborate the effects found in adipose tissue (Table 3)
.
In the lactation diet, no detectable levels of arachidonic acid were
present; however, the amount excreted by the mammary gland was
significantly different between treatments. Arachidonic acid derives
primarily from the diet or from synthesis from linoleic acid via
-linolenic acid (18:3, n-6) and dihomo-
-linolenic acid 20:3(n-6)
(Enser 1984
) by one elongation and two specific
desaturation steps (
6-and
5-desaturase). The question arises whether the
lower arachidonic acid level in the milk of the CLA group was due to
the lower dietary supply of the substrate or the result of inhibition
of one or both of the specific desaturases. Belury and Kempa-Steczko (1997)
suggested that CLA may compete with
linoleic acid for the
6-desaturase because
radiolabeled CLA was desaturated to a similar extent as radiolabeled
linoleic acid. In support of these findings, they reported reduced
arachidonic acid in the liver, which might have been the effect of
lower conversion of linoleic to arachidonic acid. Interestingly, in
their in vitro assay, CLA was converted to an unidentified 18:3
product, which might not be a suitable substrate for elongation or
desaturation by
5-desaturase.
Sows milk is naturally devoid of CLA, if not supplied by the diet
(Jahreis et al. 1999
). The accumulation of the different
CLA isomers identified, reflected that of the diet. However, contrary
to the fat biopsy, the c10,c12 isomer could be
detected only in the colostrum and not in the mature milk. The
estimated transfer or incorporation efficiency of the different isomers
from the diet to the lipids excreted by the mammary gland was lower in
the colostrum than in the mature milk (Table 5)
. Compared with the
dietary supply via the lactation diet and in agreement with the results
found for adipose tissue, relatively more c9,t11
was excreted than c9,c11;
t9,t11/t10,t12 and
t10,c12 in the mature milk. In the colostral
milk, the transfer seemed to be higher for the
c9,c11 followed by the
c10,c12; c9,t11;
t10,c12 and
t9,t11/t10,t12 CLA isomers.
This finding is in contrast to the previously estimated incorporation
(adipose tissue) and transfer efficiency rate (mature milk) and might
be the effect of the transition state of the mammary gland at the
beginning of the lactation period. However, the overall transfer
efficiency seemed to be higher in sows compared with cows in which the
transfer rate was estimated to reach 2226% for most of the infused
isomers (Chouinard et al. 1999
).
In conclusion, the data show that feeding sows a CLA-enriched diet during gestation and lactation can increase the concentration of CLA and markedly affect the fatty acid composition of backfat tissue, colostrum and mature milk lipids. The effect on the lipid composition was similar for adipose tissue and milk. Compared with the LA group, significantly more SFA and less MUFA were deposited in the tissue and excreted in the milk, whereas changes in the PUFA content were minimal, except for a significant decrease in the arachidonic acid level. Estimated transfer efficiency for adipose tissue and mature milk ranged from 41 to 52% and 55 to 69%, respectively, and seemed to be higher than that measured in cows.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
Manuscript received January 7, 2000. Initial review completed March 3, 2000. Revision accepted April 21, 2000.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Alessandri J. M., Goustard B., Guesnet P., Durand A. Docosahexaenoic acid concentrations in retinal phospholipids of piglets fed an infant formula enriched with long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids: effects of egg phospholipids and fish oils with different ratios of eicosapentaenoic acid to docosahexaenoic acid. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998;67:377-385[Abstract]
2. Bee G., Messikommer R., Gebert S. Dietary fats and energy levels differently affect tissue lipogenic enzyme activity in finishing pigs. Fett Lipid 1999;101:336-342
3. Belury M. A., Kempa-Steczko A. Conjugated linoleic acid modulates hepatic lipid composition in mice. Lipids 1997;32:199-204[Medline]
4. Boltshauser M., Jost M., Kessler J., Stoll P. Fütterungsempfehlungen und Nährwerttabellen für Schweine 1993 Landwirtschaftliche Lehrmittelzentrale Switzerland.
5. Boyd R. D., Kensinger R. S. Metabolic precursors for milk synthesis. Verstegen M.W.A. Moughan P. J. Schrama J. W. eds. The Lactating Sow 1998:71-95 Wageningen Pers Wageningen, The Netherlands.
6. Camara M., Mourot J., Fevrier C. Influence of two dairy fats on lipid synthesis in the pig: comparative study of liver, muscle and the two backfat layers. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 1996;40:287-295[Medline]
7. Chin S. F., Storkson J. M., Albright K. J., Cook M. E., Pariza M. W. Conjugated linoleic acid is a growth factor for rats as shown by enhanced weight gain and improved feed efficiency. J. Nutr. 1994;124:2344-2349
8.
Chouinard P. Y., Corneau L., Barbano D. M., Metzger L. E., Bauman D. E. Conjugated linoleic acids alter milk fatty acid composition and inhibit milk fat secretion in dairy cows. J. Nutr. 1999;129:1579-1584
9. Darragh A. J., Moughan P. J. The composition of colostrum and milk. Verstegen M.W.A. Moughan P. J. Schrama J. W. eds. The Lactating Sow 1998:3-21 Wageningen Pers Wageningen, The Netherlands.
10. Dugan M.E.R., Aalhus J. L., Jeremiah L. E., Kramer J.K.G., Schaefer A. L. The effects of feeding conjugated linoleic acid on subsequent pork quality. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1999;79:45-51
11. Dugan M.E.R., Aalhus J. L., Schaefer A. L., Kramer J.K.G. The effect of conjugated linoleic acid on fat to lean repartitioning and feed conversion in pigs. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1997;77:723-725
12. Enser M. The chemistry, biochemistry and nutritional importance of animal fats. Wiseman J. eds. Fats in Animal Nutrition 1984:23-51 Butterworths London, UK.
13. Fontanillas R., Barroeta A., Baucells M. D., Codony R. Effect of feeding highly cis-monounsaturated, trans, or n-3 fats on lipid composition of muscle and adipose tissue of pigs. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997;45:3070-3075
14. Fritsche K. L., Huang S. C., Cassity N. A. Enrichment of omega-3 fatty acids in suckling pigs by maternal dietary fish oil supplementation. J. Anim. Sci. 1993;71:1841-1847[Abstract]
15. Goustard L. B., Guesnet P., Durand G., Antoine J. M., Alessandri J. M. n-3 and n-6 fatty acid enrichment by dietary fish oil and phospholipid sources in brain cortical areas and nonneural tissues of formula-fed piglets. Lipids 1999;34:5-16[Medline]
16. Hartmann P. E., Holmes M. A. Sow lactation. Barnett J. L. Hennessy D. P. eds. Manipulating Pig Production II 1989:72-97 Australasian Pig Science Association Albury, NSW, Australia.
17. Ip C., Scimeca J. A., Thompson H. J. Conjugated linoleic acid. A powerful anticarcinogen from animal fat sources. Cancer 1994;74:1050-1054[Medline]
18. Jahreis G., Fritsche J., Mockel P., Schone F., Moller U., Steinhart H. The potential anticarcinogenic conjugated linoleic acid, cis-9,trans-11 C18: 2, in milk of different species: cow, goat, ewe, sow, mare, woman. Nutr. Res. 1999;19:1541-1549
19. Kramer J.K.G., Sehat N., Dugan M.E.R., Mossoba M. M., Yurawecz M. P., Roach J. A., Eulitz K., Aalhus J. L., Schaefer A. L., Ku Y. Distributions of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) isomers in tissue lipid classes of pigs fed a commercial CLA mixture determined by gas chromatography and silver-ion high-performance liquid chromatography. Lipids 1998;33:549-558[Medline]
20. Lee K. N., Kritchevsky D., Pariza M. W. Conjugated linoleic acid and atherosclerosis in rabbits. Atherosclerosis 1994;108:19-25[Medline]
21.
Littell R. C., Henry P. R., Ammerman C. B. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci. 1998;76:1216-1231
22.
Loor J. J., Herbein J. H. Exogenous conjugated linoleic acid isomers reduce bovine milk fat concentration and yield by inhibiting de novo fatty acid synthesis. J. Nutr. 1998;128:2411-2419
23. Metcalfe L. D., Smith J. F. The rapid preparation of fatty acid esters for gas chromatographic analyses. Anal. Chem. 1961;33:363-364
24. Miller C. C., Park Y., Pariza M. W., Cook M. E. Feeding conjugated linoleic acid to animals partially overcomes catabolic responses due to endotoxin injection. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1994;198:1107-1112[Medline]
25. Morgan C. A., Noble R. C., Cocchi M., McCartney R. Manipulation of the fatty acid composition of pig meat lipids by dietary means. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1992;58:357-368
26. Mourot J., Peiniau P., Mounier A. Effets de lacide linoleique alimentaire sur lactivité des enzymes de la lipogenese dans les tissus adipeux chez le porc [Effects of dietary linoleic acid on lipogenesis enzyme activity in adipose tissue in the pig]. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1994;34:213-220
27.
Ostrowska E., Muralitharam M., Cross R. F., Bauman D. E., Dunshea F. R. Dietary conjugated linoleic acids increase lean tissue and decrease fat deposition in growing pigs. J. Nutr. 1999;129:2037-2042
28. Pettersen J., Opstvedt J. Trans fatty acids. 4. Effects on fatty acid composition of colostrum and milk. Lipids 1991;26:711-717[Medline]
29. Purvis J. M., Clandinin M. T., Hacker R. R. Fatty acid accretion during perinatal brain growth in the pig. A model for fatty acid accretion in human brain. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1982;72:195-199
30. SAS Institute Inc. SAS Users Guide: Statistics, version 6.12 1998 SAS Institute Cary, NC.
31. Scimeca J. A., Thompson H. J., Ip C. Effect of conjugated linoleic acid on carcinogenesis. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1994;364:59-65[Medline]
32. Sugano M., Tsujita A., Yamasaki M., Yamada K., Ikeda I., Kritchevsky D. Lymphatic recovery, tissue distribution, and metabolic effects of conjugated linoleic acid in rats. J. Nutr. Biochem. 1997;8:38-43
33.
Warnants N., Van Oeckel M. J., Boucque C. V. Incorporation of dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids into pork fatty tissues. J. Anim. Sci. 1999;77:2478-2490
34. West D. B., Delany J. P., Camet P. M., Blohm F., Truett A. A., Scimeca J. Effects of conjugated linoleic acid on body fat and energy metabolism in the mouse. Am. J. Physiol. 1998;44:R667-R672
35. Winter E. Über ein neues Verfahren zur Bestimmung und Untersuchung von Fetten in Lebensmitteln. Z. Lebensm.-Unters.-Forsch. 1963;123:205-210
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. E. Weber, B. T. Richert, M. A. Belury, Y. Gu, K. Enright, and A. P. Schinckel Evaluation of the effects of dietary fat, conjugated linoleic acid, and ractopamine on growth performance, pork quality, and fatty acid profiles in genetically lean gilts J Anim Sci, March 1, 2006; 84(3): 720 - 732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Bontempo, D. Sciannimanico, G. Pastorelli, R. Rossi, F. Rosi, and C. Corino Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid Positively Affects Immunologic Variables in Lactating Sows and Piglets J. Nutr., April 1, 2004; 134(4): 817 - 824. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. H. Gillis, S. K. Duckett, J. R. Sackmann, C. E. Realini, D. H. Keisler, and T. D. Pringle Effects of supplemental rumen-protected conjugated linoleic acid or linoleic acid on feedlot performance, carcass quality, and leptin concentrations in beef cattle J Anim Sci, March 1, 2004; 82(3): 851 - 859. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Demaree, C. D. Gilbert, H. J. Mersmann, and S. B. Smith Conjugated Linoleic Acid Differentially Modifies Fatty Acid Composition in Subcellular Fractions of Muscle and Adipose Tissue but Not Adiposity of Postweanling Pigs J. Nutr., November 1, 2002; 132(11): 3272 - 3279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. W. Perfield II, G. Bernal-Santos, T. R. Overton, and D. E. Bauman Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Rumen-Protected Conjugated Linoleic Acid in Dairy Cows during Established Lactation J Dairy Sci, October 1, 2002; 85(10): 2609 - 2617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Evans, X. Lin, J. Odle, and M. McIntosh Trans-10, Cis-12 Conjugated Linoleic Acid Increases Fatty Acid Oxidation in 3T3-L1 Preadipocytes J. Nutr., March 1, 2002; 132(3): 450 - 455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Raes, G. Huyghebaert, S. De Smet, L. Nollet, S. Arnouts, and D. Demeyer The Deposition of Conjugated Linoleic Acids in Eggs of Laying Hens Fed Diets Varying in Fat Level and Fatty Acid Profile J. Nutr., February 1, 2002; 132(2): 182 - 189. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. M. Brown, Y. D. Halvorsen, Y. R. Lea-Currie, C. Geigerman, and M. McIntosh Trans-10, Cis-12, But Not Cis-9, Trans-11, Conjugated Linoleic Acid Attenuates Lipogenesis in Primary Cultures of Stromal Vascular Cells from Human Adipose Tissue J. Nutr., September 1, 2001; 131(9): 2316 - 2321. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bee Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid Consumption during Pregnancy and Lactation Influences Growth and Tissue Composition in Weaned Pigs J. Nutr., December 1, 2000; 130(12): 2981 - 2989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||