Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernandes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wolever, T. M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernandes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wolever, T. M. S.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2000;130:1932-1936.)
© 2000 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Article

Different Substrates and Methane Producing Status Affect Short-Chain Fatty Acid Profiles Produced by In Vitro Fermentation of Human Feces1 ,2

Judlyn Fernandes*, A. Venketeshwer Rao* and Thomas M. S. Wolever*,{dagger}3

* Department of Nutritional Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada M5S 3E2 and {dagger} Clinical Nutrition and Risk Factor Modification Centre and Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Canada M5C 2T2

3To whom correspondence should be addressed.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Five different substrates, i.e., lactulose, rhamnose, cornstarch, guar and ileostomy effluent, were used to determine whether methane producing status alters the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) in methane producers (MP; n = 6) and nonproducers (MNP; n = 5). Fecal samples from MP and MNP were fermented with the five substrates using an in vitro fermentation method. Subjects with a mean breath methane concentration > 0.045 µmol/L above ambient air were classified as MP. Fermentation was stopped and samples were obtained at 3, 5 and 24 h. An HPLC method was used to measure the SCFA, acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, butyrate, valerate and isocaproate. A significant interaction between methane producing status and time for acetate production from lactulose was observed. There were no differences in fermentation of the four remaining substrates between MP and MNP, but there were significant differences among substrates in the two groups combined. Acetate production from lactulose was significantly greater than from the four other substrates, whereas that from ileostomy effluent was significantly less than the four other substrates. The amount of propionate produced from rhamnose was significantly higher than from the other substrates. The amount of butyrate produced from lactulose and cornstarch was significantly higher than from the other substrates. We conclude that differences exist in the fermentation patterns of lactulose, rhamnose, cornstarch, guar and ileostomy effluent. Methane producing status may influence fermentation patterns only of substrates that are largely fermented to acetate and not others.


KEY WORDS: • humans • methane • short-chain fatty acids • in vitro fermentation


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The principal end products of colonic fermentation are short-chain fatty acids (SCFA),4 carbon dioxide, hydrogen and methane. The last-mentioned is produced by highly anaerobic methanogenic bacteria via the reduction of carbon dioxide. Excretion of methane in the breath can be used as a simple indicator of methane production in the colon (Bond et al. 1971Citation ). All humans harbor methanogens in the colon, but pulmonary methane excretion is observed only in subjects with >108 Methanobrevibacter smithii/g dry feces (Miller and Wolin 1986Citation ).

A higher fasting serum acetate concentration was observed in methane producers (MP) compared with methane nonproducers (MNP) by Wolever et al. (1993)Citation , and it was suggested that this may be due to an increased rate of colonic production of acetate in producers compared with nonproducers. The mechanism for the increased rate of colonic acetate production was hypothesized to be due to the presence of methane-producing bacteria, which enhance acetate production from other species as observed by Chen and Wolin (1977)Citation using pure cultures of rumen bacteria.

Very few human studies have looked at the pattern of colonic SCFA production in methane producers compared with nonproducers. Wolin and Miller (1983)Citation found no significant differences in the proportion of SCFA in the feces of producers and nonproducers. Weaver et al. (1989)Citation studied fermentation of glucose and cornstarch in a producer and nonproducer over a 3.5-y period and observed that methanogenesis was accompanied by less propionate and more acetate production. Thus, our aim was to compare SCFA profiles in methane producers and nonproducers after in vitro fecal fermentation with different types of substrate.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We studied 11 healthy subjects (6 MP and 5 MNP) using a protocol approved by the Human Subjects Review Committee of the University of Toronto. Subjects with a history of diabetes, a thyroid disorder, liver disease, any gastrointestinal disorders or antibiotic use in the 3 mo before the study were excluded. Subjects were classified as MP and MNP using alveolar breath samples collected in 20-mL syringes by the subjects after fasting and at hourly intervals for 4 h using a modified Haldane-Priestly tube (Metz et al. 1976Citation ). Before collection, subjects were asked to breathe normally to prevent precollection hyperventilation. Breath hydrogen and methane were measured against known standards by gas chromatography (Quintron Microlyser, Model DP, Milwaukee, WI) on the same day the sample was collected. Subjects also collected a sample of room air in a 20-mL syringe to measure breath methane and hydrogen concentrations in room air. Breath methane concentration was determined by subtracting the methane of room air from the average concentration in the samples collected. Subjects whose mean corrected breath methane concentrations were <0.045 µmol/L above ambient air were considered MNP. MP were defined as subjects with a corrected breath methane concentration > 0.045 µmol/L.

Fresh fecal samples, collected individually from subjects who had been consuming their regular diet, were used as an innoculum source. A batch-culture fermentation technique (McBurney and Thompson 1987Citation ) was used, and the fecal samples were fermented with five different types of substrate, lactulose (4-O-ß-D-galactopyranosyl D-fructofuranose), {alpha}-L-rhamnose (6-deoxy-L-mannose), gum guar and cornstarch, which were obtained from Sigma Chemical (St. Louis, MO) and freeze-dried ileostomy effluent. On analysis, ileostomy effluent on a freeze-dried basis was composed of 56% carbohydrate, 21.8% protein, 2.3% fat, 35% fiber, 20.8% available carbohydrate, 5.8% moisture and 14.4% ash. Replicates were analyzed for each substrate at each time. Fermentation was stopped and samples were collected at 0 h and after 3, 5 and 24 h of fermentation. The fermentation samples were stored at -70°C until analysis.

The fermentation samples were prepared using a method modified from Chen and Lifschitz (1989)Citation . The frozen fermentation samples were thawed and ~15 mL was centrifuged at 9000 x g at 4°C for 20 min. The supernatant was filtered through a Millex-GS 0.22-µm filter unit (Millipore, Bedford, MA) attached to a syringe to remove bacterial cells. Another filtration was then done through a microconcentrator (centricon-3, Amicon, Danvers, MA) with a molecular-mass cutoff of 3000 Da, by centrifugation (7000 x g at 4°C for 1 h). The filtrate was then analyzed using a HPLC method for the SCFA, acetic, propionic, isobutyric, butyric, valeric and isocaproic. Ethyl-butyric acid was used as an internal standard. The HPLC system consisted of a Waters Model 510 HPLC Pump (Waters Division of Millipore, Milford, MA), Aminex HPX-87H Ion Exclusion Column (7.8 mm i.d. x 30 cm, Biorad, Richmond, CA), a Micro-Guard Cation-H guard column (4.6 mm i.d. x 30 mm, Biorad) and a HPLC column heater (Biorad) and a Model 787A Variable Wavelength detector (Micromeritics Instrument, Norcross, GA), which was set at a wavelength of 210 nm and a sensitivity of 2.56 AUFS. The mobile phase was 0.005 mol/L sulfuric acid (Fisher Scientific, Nepean, ON, 95.5–96.5% pure) filtered, degassed and pumped at a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min through the column heated to 60°C. Quantification of the peaks by height was achieved by a HP 3396 Series II Integrator (Hewlett-Packard, Avondale, PA) and CPS 100 software (A.I.M. Instruments, Calgary, Canada) using the internal standard method.

SCFA amounts are expressed as mmol/g carbohydrate (mmol/g CHO). We assumed that lactulose, rhamnose and cornstarch were 100% carbohydrate; from published values, guar was 89.4% carbohydrate (McBurney and Thompson, 1989Citation ) and carbohydrate in freeze-dried ileostomy effluent was calculated to be 56%.

Statistical analysis was done using Systat for Windows Version 5 (Systat, Evanston, IL). The main end point was SCFA at 24 h. For SCFA at 24 h, significance was assessed by ANOVA using the General Linear Model and testing for the effects of group (i.e., methane producer status), substrate and group x substrate interactions. Within substrates, a similar ANOVA was performed testing for group, time and time x group interactions. For comparing individual means, the Newman-Kuels procedure was used to adjust for multiple comparisons. Unpaired Student’s t test using a computer spreadsheet in Microsoft Excel 97 (Microsoft, Seattle, WA) was used to analyze the data in Table 1Citation . Results are expressed as means ± SEM. Differences were considered significant at P <= 0.05.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Age, body mass index (BMI), and breath hydrogen and methane in methane producers (MP) and methane nonproducers (MNP)1

 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We studied 6 MP (3 men and 3 women) and 5 MNP (2 men and 3 women). There were no differences between MP and MNP in age or body mass index (Table 1)Citation .

There were no significant differences in production of acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, butyrate, valerate and isocaproate from lactulose, rhamnose, cornstarch, guar and ileostomy effluent at 3, 5 and 24 h between MP and MNP (Fig. 1Citation ). However, there was a significant interaction between methane producing status and time for production of acetate from lactulose (P = 0.01); at 5 h, MNP produced significantly more acetate compared with MP, whereas at 24 h, MNP produced significantly less acetate than MP. The amount of individual SCFA produced in vitro in MP and MNP as a percentage of total SCFA did not differ.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Acetate, propionate and butyrate produced at 3, 5 and 24 h from lactulose, rhamnose, cornstarch, gum guar and ileostomy effluent (I Effluent) in feces of methane producers (MP) and nonproducers (MNP). Values are means ± SEM, n = 6 for MP and n = 5 for MNP; CHO, carbohydrate. *Significant interaction between methane producing status x time, P = 0.01.

 
Lactulose fermented in vitro at 24 h produced significantly increased concentrations of acetate compared with the other substrates (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2ACitation ). Rhamnose produced significantly more propionate compared with the other substrates (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2ACitation ). Significantly increased concentrations of butyrate were produced by lactulose and cornstarch at 24 h compared with the other substrates (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2ACitation ).



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Branched-chain and total short chain fatty acids produced from lactulose, rhamnose, cornstarch, gum guar and ileostomy effluent in human feces in vitro at 24 h. Panel A: Acetate, propionate and butyrate produced expressed as mmol/g carbohydrate (mmol/g CHO). Panel B: Isobutyrate, valerate and isocaproate produced as a percentage of total SCFA in the whole group expressed as mmol/gm carbohydrate (mmol/g CHO). For Panels A and B, values are means ± SEM, n = 11. Means not sharing a common letter superscript are significantly different, upper case letters, P < 0.01; lower case letters, P < 0.001. Panel C: Total short-chain fatty acids (acetate, propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate, valerate and isocaproate) produced in the two groups combined. Values are means ± SEM, n = 11. Means not sharing a common letter superscript are significantly different (P < 0.05).

 
Because isobutyrate, valerate and isocaproate were produced in small amounts, they were combined for statistical purposes. There was no significant difference in the total amounts of these branched-chain acids produced at 24 h among the substrates. As a percentage of total SCFA produced at 24 h, ileostomy effluent produced significantly greater amounts of the branched-chain acids compared with the other substrates (P < 0.01) (Fig. 2BCitation ).

Total SCFA (i.e., acetate, propionate, butyrate, isobutyrate, valerate and isocaproate) production from lactulose and guar were significantly higher compared with cornstarch and ileostomy effluent at 24 h in the groups combined (P < 0.05) (Fig. 2CCitation ).

The PR:AC (propionate:acetate) ratio at 24 h was significantly higher with rhamnose compared with lactulose, rhamnose, cornstarch, guar and ileostomy effluent in the group combined.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study shows that methane producing status does not alter SCFA production patterns during in vitro fermentation with rhamnose, cornstarch, guar and ileostomy effluent. However, we did see a significant interaction between methane producing status and time for acetate production with lactulose. Acetate production was greater in MNP than MP early on (5 h), but the rise was delayed in MP and seen only at 24 h, probably because methanogens are slow-growing bacteria. Lactulose is fermented mainly to acetate, and in vitro work indicates that the presence of methanogens may increase acetate production (Chen and Wolin 1977Citation , Weaver et al. 1989Citation ). It may very well be that methanogens increase acetate production only from substrates that are largely fermented to acetate in vitro. This observation has not been reported before and requires further study. It will be of interest in MP and MNP in vivo, when substrates that increase colonic acetate production are consumed.

Earlier work in a small group of subjects suggested that there are differences in fasting serum SCFA concentrations in MP and MNP; these may be due to differences in colonic production, absorption or peripheral utilization between the two groups (Wolever et al. 1993Citation ). Subsequently, it was observed that fasting serum SCFA measured in 66 MP and 63 MNP consuming regular diets were not different (Fernandes et al. 1998Citation ). Because differences in colonic production of SCFA may be difficult to observe in peripheral blood from fasting subjects, this study looked at in vitro production as an alternative way of examining differences between the two groups. Our results with the substrates other than lactulose agree with other earlier and recent studies in the literature. Wolin and Miller (1983)Citation suggested that in humans, the amount of methane produced is rarely sufficient to influence significantly the species that produce the major fermentation products. They found no significant differences in the ratios of acetate:propionate:butyrate (56:21:19 vs. 55:22:23) in feces of producers and nonproducers and concluded that this may be due to a considerable amount of acetate being produced by homoacetate fermentation in nonproducers. In methane producers, this homoacetate fermentation is displaced by an acetate-producing methanogenic fermentation. An alternative pathway of CO2 reduction to acetate has been shown to exist in methane nonproducers, which may compensate for the increased acetate produced in methane producers (Lajoie et al. 1988Citation ). It is becoming increasingly evident that acetate produced by homoacetate fermentation may be a major source of acetate and an important pathway for hydrogen disposal in the colon of subjects harboring low numbers of methanogens (Bernalier et al. 1996Citation , Lajoie et al. 1988Citation , Miller and Wolin 1996Citation ). The highest populations of acetogens were observed in the feces of methane nonproducers (Doré et al. 1995aCitation ). It has also been suggested that there might be a competitive interrelation in the human colon between methanogenic and acetogenic bacteria (Doré et al. 1995bCitation ). Studies have suggested that acetogenesis may contribute 25–33% of total acetate produced (Leclerc et al. 1997Citation , Miller and Wolin 1996Citation ).

We also studied the effect of the different substrates (lactulose, rhamnose, cornstarch, gum guar and ileostomy effluent) on SCFA production profiles in the two groups combined. The substrates used in our in vitro system either mimicked normal dietary constituents available for fermentation in the colon (cornstarch and ileostomy effluent) or were mono- (rhamnose) or disaccharides (lactulose or 4-O-ß-D-galactopyranosyl D-fructofuranose), and a dietary fiber supplement (gum guar). The type of substrate affected SCFA production in vitro because the monosaccharide composition of fiber largely influences SCFA production patterns (Barry et al. 1989Citation , Mortensen et al. 1988Citation ). At 24 h, lactulose fermentation produced significantly more acetate than the other substrates we studied. In addition, the total production of butyrate by lactulose fermentation, as well as butyrate produced as a percentage of total SCFA at 24 h from lactulose (18.2%), was not significantly different from cornstarch (20.9%). Fermentation of cornstarch is widely known to yield more butyrate (Macfarlane and Englyst 1986Citation , Weaver et al. 1989Citation and 1992Citation ), but, only one other study has reported significant butyric acid production from lactulose (Sahota et al. 1982Citation ). Butyrate is important as a source of energy to colonocytes; it regulates differentiation of cultured cells and inhibits tumor growth in vitro and possibly inflammation (Mortensen and Clausen 1996Citation ).

Another interesting finding, observed in an earlier study in humans, was that in vitro fermentation of rhamnose produced significantly more propionate (Mortensen et al. 1988Citation ). It also produced a significantly higher PR:AC ratio compared with the other substrates we studied. This observation has significance for in vivo study in view of the hypocholesterolemic effects of propionate. Studies in isolated rat hepatocytes have shown that propionate at various concentrations inhibits cholesterol synthesis (Beynen et al. 1982Citation , Nishina and Freedland 1990Citation , Wright et al. 1990Citation ). Rectal infusion studies show that colonic acetate is incorporated into serum cholesterol and triglycerides, acutely raises the levels of serum lipids and these effects are blocked by propionate (Wolever et al. 1991Citation and 1995Citation ). In animal studies, decreased serum cholesterol concentrations were observed in rats fed diets supplemented with propionate (Illman et al. 1988Citation ), or cholesterol and propionate (Chen et al. 1984Citation ). In pigs, orally administered propionate appeared to depress cholesterol synthesis only when tallow was included in the diet (Boila et al. 1981Citation ) and also lowered serum cholesterol (Thacker et al. 1981Citation ). In obese hyperinsulinemic rats, propionate induced a significant lowering of the liver cholesterol pool when propionate was fed orally (1 g/d) or infused rectally (0.15 g/d) for 19 d together with diets high in cholesterol and fat compared with a control group (Berggren et al. 1996Citation ). Feeding propionate in the form of calcium propionate (75mmol/d for 15 d) to humans with a serum cholesterol > 5.5 mmol/L reduced serum cholesterol by 5% (Stephen et al. 1994Citation ), although no effect of propionate feeding was seen in other studies (Todesco et al. 1991Citation , Venter et al. 1990Citation ). In the context of these studies, feeding rhamnose, which is fermented largely to propionate in vitro, to humans may provide answers to a number of basic questions.

Ileostomy effluent, which contains more protein (21.8%) compared with the other substrates, produced the greatest amount of isobutyric, valeric and isocaproic acid as a percentage of total SCFA at 24 h. In humans under normal conditions, colonic fermentation leads to the production of small amounts of isobutyrate, valerate and isocaproate, and it has been suggested that they originate from protein and polypeptide breakdown (Mortensen et al. 1988Citation , Rasmussen et al. 1988Citation ).

In conclusion, our study shows that in vitro methane producing status may affect colonic SCFA production profiles only from substrates that are largely fermented to acetate but not other substrates. It does not rule out the possibility, however, that there might be altered SCFA absorption in methane producers compared with nonproducers. This study has shown that depending on the type of substrate fermented in vitro, significantly different SCFA profiles can be produced. This finding has large implications in the planning of future studies to examine the in vivo effect of feeding these substrates to humans, altering colonic SCFA patterns and studying the potential effects on serum concentrations of SCFA and lipids.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Presented in part in abstract form at Experimental Biology 97, April 1997, New Orleans, LA [Fernandes, J., Wolever, T.M.S. & Rao, A. V. (1997) In vitro production of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) from lactulose and rhamnose in methane producers and nonproducers. FASEB J 11: A611 (abs.)] and at the 16th International Congress of Nutrition, [Fernandes, J., Wolever, T.M.S. & Rao, A.V. (1997) Differences in in vitro production of short chain fatty acids (SCFA) from lactulose, rhamnose, cornstarch, guar and ileostomy effluent. PR.216]. Back

2 Supported by a grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. Back

4 Abbreviations used: MNP, methane nonproducer; MP, methane producer; PR:AC, propionate:acetate ratio; SCFA, short-chain fatty acids. Back

Manuscript received December 14, 1999. Initial review completed January 26, 2000. Revision accepted March 28, 2000.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

1. Barry J.-L., Chourot J.-M., Bonnet C., Kozlowski F., David A. In vitro fermentation of neutral monosaccharides by ruminal and human fecal microflora. Acta Vet. Scand. 1989;86(suppl.):93-95

2. Berggren A. M., Nyman E.M.G.L., Lundquist I., Björck I.M.E. Influence of orally and rectally administered propionate on cholesterol and glucose metabolism in obese rats. Br. J. Nutr. 1996;76:287-294[Medline]

3. Bernalier A., Lelait M., Rochet V., Grivet J. P., Gibson G. R., Durand M. Acetogenesis from H2 and CO2 by methane- and non-methane-producing human colonic bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1996;19:193-202

4. Beynen A. C., Beuchler K., Van Der Molen A. J., Geelen M.J.H. The effects of lactate and acetate on fatty acid and cholesterol biosynthesis by isolated rat hepatocytes. Int. J. Biochem. 1982;14:165-169[Medline]

5. Boila R. J., Saolmons M. D., Milligan I. P., Aherne F. X. The effect of dietary propionic acid on cholesterol synthesis in swine. Nutr. Rep. Int. 1981;23:1113-1121

6. Bond J. H., Jr, Engel R. R., Levitt M. D. Factors influencing pulmonary methane excretion in man. J. Exp. Med. 1971;133:572-588[Abstract]

7. Chen H.-M., Lifschitz C. H. Preparation of fecal samples for assay of volatile fatty acids by gas-liquid chromatography and high-performance liquid chromatography. Clin. Chem. 1989;35:74-76[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Chen M., Wolin M. J. Influence of CH4 production by Methanobacterium ruminantium on the fermentation of glucose and lactate by Selenomonas ruminantium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1977;34:756-759[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Chen W.J.L., Anderson J. W., Jennings D. Propionate may mediate the hypocholesterolemic effects of certain soluble fibers in cholesterol-fed rats. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1984;175:215-218[Abstract]

10. Doré J., Morvan B., Rieu-Lesme F., Goderel I., Gouet P., Pochart P. Most probable number enumeration of H2-utilizing acetogenic bacteria from the digestive tract of animals and man. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1995a;130:7-12[Medline]

11. Doré J., Pochart P., Bernalier A., Goderel I., Morvan B., Rambaud J.C. Enumeration of H2-utilizing methanogenic archaea, acetogenic and sulfate-reducing bacteria from human feces. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 1995b;17:279-284

12. Fernandes J., Wolever T.M.S., Rao A. V. Increased serum cholesterol in healthy human methane producers is confounded by age. J. Nutr. 1998;128:1349-1354[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Illman R. J., Topping D. L., McIntosh G. H., Trimble R. P., Storer G. B., Taylor M. N., Cheng B.-Q. Hypocholesterolaemic effects of dietary propionate: studies in whole animals and perfused rat liver. Ann. Nutr. Metab. 1988;32:97-107

14. Lajoie S. F., Bank S., Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Acetate production from hydrogen and [13C]carbon dioxide by the microflora of human feces. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1988;54:2723-2727[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Leclerc M., Bernalier A., Lelait M., Grivet J.-P. 13C-NMR study of glucose and pyruvate catabolism in four acetogenic species isolated from the human colon. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1997;146:199-204[Medline]

16. Macfarlane G. T., Englyst H. N. Starch utilization by the human large intestinal microflora. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1986;60:195-201[Medline]

17. McBurney M. I., Thompson L. U. Effect of human faecal innoculum on in vitro fermentation variables. Br. J. Nutr. 1987;58:233-243[Medline]

18. McBurney M. I., Thompson L. U. In vitro fermentabilities of purified fiber supplements. J. Food Sci. 1989;54:347-350

19. Metz G., Gassul M. A., Leeds A. R., Blendis L. M., Jenkins D.J.A. A simple method for measuring breath hydrogen in carbohydrate malabsorption by end-expiratory sampling. Clin. Sci. Mol. Med. 1976;50:237-240[Medline]

20. Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Methanogens in human and animal intestinal tracts. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1986;7:223-229

21. Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Pathways of acetate, propionate and butyrate formation by the human fecal microbial flora. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996;62:1589-1592[Abstract]

22. Mortensen P. B., Clausen M. R. Short-chain fatty acids in the human colon: relation to gastrointestinal health and disease. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1996;31(suppl. 216):132-148

23. Mortensen P. B., Holtug K., Rasmussen H. S. Short-chain fatty acid production from mono- and disaccharides in a fecal incubation system: implications for colonic fermentation of dietary fiber in humans. J. Nutr. 1988;118:321-325

24. Nishina P. M., Freedland R. A. Effects of propionate on lipid biosynthesis in rat hepatocytes. J. Nutr. 1990;120:668-673

25. Rasmussen H. S., Holtug K., Mortensen P. B. Degradation of amino acids to short-chain fatty acids in humans. An in vitro study. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1988;23:178-182[Medline]

26. Sahota S. S., Bramley P. M., Menzies I. S. The fermentation of lactulose by colonic bacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol. 1982;128:319-325[Medline]

27. Stephen A. Propionate-sources and effect on lipid metabolism. Binder H. J. Cummings J. H. Soergel K. H. eds. Short Chain Fatty Acids-Falk Symposium 73 1994:260-271 Kluwer Academic Lancaster, UK.

28. Thacker P. A., Salomons M. O., Aherne F. X., Milligan L. P., Bowland J. P. Influence of propionic acid on the cholesterol metabolism of pigs fed hypercholesterolemic diets. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 1981;61:969-975

29. Todesco T., Rao A. V., Bosello O., Jenkins D.J.A. Propionate lowers blood glucose and alters lipid metabolism in healthy subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991;54:860-865[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. Venter C. S., Vorster H. H., Cummings J. H. Effects of dietary propionate on carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in healthy volunteers. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1990;85:549-553[Medline]

31. Weaver G. A., Krause J. A., Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Constancy of glucose and starch fermentation by two different human faecal microbial communities. Gut 1989;30:19-25[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Weaver G. A., Krause J. A., Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Cornstarch fermentation by the colonic microbial community yields more butyrate than does cabbage fiber fermentation; cornstarch fermentation rates correlate negatively with methanogenesis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1992;55:70-77[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Wolever T.M.S., Robb P. A., Ter Wal P., Spadafora P. G. Interaction between methane-producing status and diet on serum acetate concentration in humans. J. Nutr. 1993;123:681-688

34. Wolever T.M.S., Spadafora P. J., Cunnane S. C., Pencharz P. B. Propionate inhibits incorporation of colonic [1,2-13C]acetate into plasma lipids in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995;61:1241-1247[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Wolever T.M.S., Spadafora P., Eshuis H. Interaction between colonic acetate and propionate in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991;53:681-687[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Wolin M. J., Miller T. L. Carbohydrate fermentation. Hentges D. J. eds. Human Intestinal Microflora in Health And Disease 1983:147-165 Academic Press London, UK.

37. Wright R. S., Anderson J. W., Bridges S. R. Propionate inhibits hepatocyte lipid synthesis (43113). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1990;195:26-29[Abstract]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. A. Vogt, K. B. Ishii-Schrade, P. B. Pencharz, P. J. H. Jones, and T. M. S. Wolever
L-Rhamnose and Lactulose Decrease Serum Triacylglycerols and Their Rates of Synthesis, but Do Not Affect Serum Cholesterol Concentrations in Men
J. Nutr., August 1, 2006; 136(8): 2160 - 2166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. A Vogt, K. B Ishii-Schrade, P. B Pencharz, and T. M. Wolever
L-Rhamnose increases serum propionate after long-term supplementation, but lactulose does not raise serum acetate
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2004; 80(5): 1254 - 1261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. A Vogt, P. B Pencharz, and T. M. Wolever
L-Rhamnose increases serum propionate in humans
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2004; 80(1): 89 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
J. A. Vogt and T. M. S. Wolever
Fecal Acetate Is Inversely Related to Acetate Absorption from the Human Rectum and Distal Colon
J. Nutr., October 1, 2003; 133(10): 3145 - 3148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T. M. Wolever, K. B Schrade, J. A Vogt, E. B Tsihlias, and M. I McBurney
Do colonic short-chain fatty acids contribute to the long-term adaptation of blood lipids in subjects with type 2 diabetes consuming a high-fiber diet?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2002; 75(6): 1023 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fernandes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wolever, T. M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fernandes, J.
Right arrow Articles by Wolever, T. M. S.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]