![]() |
|
|
3To whom correspondence and reprint request should be addressed: AREDS Coordinating Center, The EMMES Corporation, 11325 Seven Locks Road, Suite 214, Potomac, MD 20854. [A complete list of authors is provided in The Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group (1999
).]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: zinc age-related macular degeneration cataract clinical trial antioxidants vitamin C vitamin E beta-carotene
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
There is no known effective prophylaxis for AMD, and there is
no effective treatment for most cases of AMD. Laser photocoagulation
has been documented to be beneficial in a small proportion of patients
with well-defined CNV (Macular Photocoagulation Study Group 1991
, 1990b
, 1993
), but
recurrence of CNV is common and often results in further vision loss
(Macular Photocoagulation Study Group 1986
,
1990a
). There is no proven treatment for persons with
the non-neovascular form of the disease. Zinc supplementation was
assessed in a small clinical trial because the RPE, the tissue under
the retina that nourishes the rods and cones, normally has a
particularly high zinc content. It was hypothesized that poor zinc
intake in elderly persons might result in zinc deficiency and the loss
of zinc-dependent coenzymes in the RPE, resulting in development or
worsening of AMD. Results from this randomized clinical trial suggested
that pharmacological doses of zinc might provide some protection
against vision loss from this non-neovascular form of the disease.
(Newsome et al. 1988
) In addition, before the start of
AREDS, several epidemiological studies published data suggesting a
possible role of antioxidants in reducing the risk of cancer,
cardiovascular disease and eye disease. (both AMD and cataract)
(Buring and Hennekens 1995
, Sperduto et al. 1990
, Stampfer et al. 1993
) With limited
treatment options and no prophylaxis available for AMD, the findings
from these studies led to the widespread use of vitamin and mineral
formulations containing antioxidants and zinc. This increased use
occurred despite an admonition by the authors of the zinc trial that,
"it is definitely premature to recommend widespread use of zinc"
(Newsome et al. 1988
). Extensive marketing of high dose
commercially available preparations of antioxidant vitamins and zinc
increased the visibility and availability of these products and
contributed to their widespread use. An objective assessment of the
efficacy and safety of nutritional intervention for preventing the
development and progression of these conditions was judged to be
needed. Because both AMD and cataract progress slowly, it appeared that
a large and prolonged trial would be necessary to test the effect of
nutritional supplementation. Details of the rationale for the eventual
study sample size have been published elsewhere.3
| Age-Related Eye Disease Study |
|---|
|
|
|---|
When the planning for AREDS began, pharmaceutical companies were marketing several formulations of the vitamins and minerals of interest. The formulation chosen for the AREDS clinical trials was based on recommendations from expert nutritionists, ophthalmologists and biochemists who reviewed basic science, clinical trial and epidemiological data at a series of meetings sponsored by the NEI. Two carotenoids, lutein and zeaxanthin, which are known to be present in the central retina, were strong candidates for inclusion in the AREDS formulation, but they were not commercially available when AREDS started. Beta-carotene, a carotenoid with systemic antioxidant properties, was chosen because the manufacturers of ophthalmic nutritional supplements were promoting its effectiveness, clinical trials of heart disease and cancer were studying it and it was commercially available. In addition, it was decided to include pharmacological doses of the antioxidant vitamins C and E. This vitamin/antioxidant formulation was expected to possibly affect the progression of both cataract and AMD.
Zinc had been reported to be beneficial for AMD, but there was no
evidence of an effect on lens opacities. It was decided to assess
whether zinc, alone or in combination with the vitamin/antioxidant
formulation, could slow the progression of AMD. Formulations that
included zinc also had copper added to offset potential
zinc-induced copper deficiency anemia. Study participants who were
thought to be at risk of vision loss from AMD on the basis of the
presence of drusen or RPE changes were part of a factorial design that
evaluated both the zinc formulation and the vitamin/antioxidant
formulation. Study participants without these AMD lesions were not
assigned to receive zinc because of possible toxicity and no evidence
of potential ocular benefit. They were assigned to receive either the
vitamin/antioxidant formulation or placebo. The 3640 participants at
risk of AMD progression were randomly assigned in a factorial design to
receive zinc alone, antioxidants alone, zinc and antioxidants, or
placebo (Fig. 1
). The exact doses of the ingredients in these formulations are
currently proprietary. The daily dosage of zinc oxide in the
formulation is
5 times the current recommended daily allowance
(RDA). The clinical trials are double masked in that neither the AREDS
participant nor the study investigators know the participants
treatment assignment.
|
Eligible participants were 5580 y old at enrollment and had to be free of any illness or condition that would make long-term followup or compliance with study medications unlikely or difficult. On the basis of fundus photographs graded at a central reading center, best-corrected visual acuity measured with a standard protocol and ophthalmological evaluations, participants were enrolled in one of several AMD categories. Details of the retinal classification of participants in the study are provided elsewhere.3
An important design feature of AREDS is the inclusion of participants who, at the time of screening, were current users of dietary supplements containing nutrients that are also contained in the study medication. Fifty-five percent of enrolled AREDS participants were supplementing their diet with at least one AREDS ingredient at the time of screening, and half of these participants were taking RDA dosages rather than the pharmacological dosages of the study medication. To accommodate such persons and to standardize the use of nonstudy supplements, a daily dose of a widely available multivitamin tablet (Centrum) is provided to each participant who wishes to take or continue taking a multivitamin. Approximately 60% of AREDS participants chose to take Centrum. Persons in the "placebo" group who take Centrum will have a dietary intake of vitamins C and E, beta-carotene and zinc plus an additional RDA amount that is contained in Centrum. Similarly, persons in the "active" treatment groups will be increasing their intake by an RDA amount of the study vitamins and minerals if they take Centrum. The statistical power of the study to test its primary hypothesis regarding pharmacological doses of these nutrients may be reduced to the extent that prior use or the continued use of RDA dosages of these nutrients affects the outcomes of interest. However, by including such persons in the study population, the AREDS population more closely resembles the supplementation habits of the general population in this age group.
Study outcomes.
The main study outcome variables for the zinc trial are change in visual acuity and change in AMD. An eye is considered as having progressed to advanced AMD when vision-threatening lesions have developed. These lesions include signs of geographic atrophy involving the center of the macula or signs of CNV (defined as the presence beneath the RPE or sensory retina of fluid, blood or fibrovascular or fibrous tissue). Centrally graded fundus photographs are used to assess the progression of retinal disease. Four comparisons of the effect of treatment on primary outcomes will include the following: (1) progression to advanced AMD in a comparison of the antioxidant and no-antioxidant groups, (2) progression to advanced AMD in a comparison of the zinc and no-zinc groups, (3) a 15-letter decrease in visual acuity score in a comparison of the antioxidant and no-antioxidant groups and (4) a 15-letter decrease in visual acuity score in a comparison of the zinc and no-zinc groups.
If there is evidence of a statistically significant interaction between zinc and antioxidants, then analyses will be restricted to outcomes within each of the four treatment cells.
Data collection.
Baseline data and data on potential risk factors for the development
and progression of AMD were obtained by examination and interview at
the time of randomization. These data, which were collected for all
participants, included comorbidity (e.g., history of malignancy,
cardiovascular disease), current and past medication and hormone use
and an assessment of nutrient intake using a modified Block Food
Frequency Questionnaire, which assessed dietary intake during the year
before randomization. Then 24-h dietary recall interviews were
conducted by telephone by workers at the nutrition center on a sample
of 197 participants from the three clinical centers at which serum
samples are collected (see later). An interview designed to calculate
mean annual effective ocular sunlight exposure (Carson et al. 1996
, Rosenthal et al. 1991
) was implemented in
1996. Starting in 1998, study participants were asked to donate blood
samples for DNA isolation and the creation of immortalized cell lines
to be used in current and future studies of genetic markers for AMD and
cataract.
The 25-item NEI Visual Function Questionnaire with an appendix of 11
additional questions (NEI VFQ-25, 1996
) was incorporated
in 1997 to measure the effect of vision on daily living activities. The
questionnaire is administered to all participants at the 5-y followup
visit and on two occasions at a 3-y interval. Best-corrected visual
acuity is measured at randomization and at yearly intervals using a
standard protocol adapted from the Early Treatment of Diabetic
Retinopathy Study (Ferris et al. 1982
). The AREDS
researchers made minor modifications to the Early Treatment of Diabetic
Retinopathy Study protocol, including the use of a rear-lighted
instead of a front-lighted box (Ferris and Sperduto 1982
). Standard lens and fundus photographs are taken at
baseline and at yearly follow-up visits, beginning 2 y after
enrollment.
Possible adverse experiences are monitored in all participants through
interview data (e.g., fatigue, gastric complications, skin color
change) every 6 mo. Hematocrit levels are measured annually for all
participants to assess possible copper deficiency anemia, which may be
associated with the administration of zinc. At 3 of the 11 AREDS
clinical centers, additional serum samples were collected before
randomization, and they are collected at each annual visit after a 12-h
limited fast and a 4-h complete fast. Tests on these samples include
measurement of serum levels of zinc, copper, cholesterol, vitamins E
and C and carotenoids, including lutein/zeaxanthin and
alpha-carotene. Lutein/zeaxanthin and alpha-carotene are
measured because pharmacological doses of beta-carotene may affect
the serum levels of other carotenoids. HDL, total cholesterol and
triglycerides are also measured because of reports that zinc use may
affect serum lipid levels (Black et al. 1988
,
Freeland-Graves et al. 1982
, Goodwin et al. 1985
, Hooper et al. 1980
). Hospitalization data,
including discharge summaries, are obtained. Staff at the Coordinating
Center use International Classification of DiseaseNinth
Revision coding to assign the causes of hospitalization.
Self-reported adverse experiences are recorded if the participant
or the participants health care provider reports a possible
relationship with the study medication. Deaths are reported to the
Coordinating Center within 24 h after the clinical center is
notified. Death certificates are obtained and causes of death are
assigned by Coordinating Center staff according to International
Classification of DiseaseNinth Revision codes.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Supported by contracts from the National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health. ![]()
4 Abbreviations used: AMD, age-related macular degeneration; AREDS, Age-Related Eye Disease Study; CNV, choroidal neovascularization; NEI, National Eye Institute; RDA, recommended daily allowance; RPE, retinal pigment epithelial or epithelium. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Black M. R., Medeiros D. M., Brunett E., Weeke R. Zinc supplements and serum lipids in young adult white males. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1988;47:970-975
2. Buring J. F., Hennekens C. H. Prasad K. eds. Nutrients in Cancer Prevention and Treatment 1995:223-234 Humana Press, Inc. Totowa, NJ.
3. Carson C., Lee S., Livingston P., Bissinella M., Taylor H. R. Ocular exposure to UV-B in sunlight: the Melbourne visual impairment model. Bull. World Health Organ. 1996;74:53-60
4. Ferris F. L., Kassoff A., Bresnick G. H., Bailey I New visual acuity charts for clinical research. Am. J. Ophthalmol 1982;94:91-96[Medline]
5. Ferris F. L., Sperduto R. D. Standardized illumination for visual acuity testing in clinical research. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 1982;94:97-98[Medline]
6.
Freeland-Graves J. H., Friedman B. J., Han W. H., Shorey R. L., Young R. Effect of zinc supplementation on plasma high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and zinc. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1982;35:988-992
7. Goodwin J. S., Hunt W. C., Hooper P., Garry P. J. Relationship between zinc intake, physical activity, and blood levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in a healthy elderly population. Metabolism 1985;34:519-523[Medline]
8.
Hooper P. L., Visconti L., Garry P. J., Johnson G. E. Zinc lowers high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1980;244:1960-1961
9. Kahn, H. A. & Moorhead, H. B. (1973) Statistics on Blindness in the Model Reporting Area: 19691970. U.S. Department of Health, Education & Welfare, U.S. Public Health Service publication No. (NIH) 73-427, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
10.
Macular Photocoagulation Study Group Recurrent choroidal neovascularization after argon laser treatment for neovascular maculopathy. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1986;104:503-512
11.
Macular Photocoagulation Study Group Persistent and recurrent neovascularization after krypton laser photocoagulation for neovascular lesions of age-related macular degeneration. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1990a;108:825-831
12.
Macular Photocoagulation Study Group Krypton laser photocoagulation for neovascular lesions of age-related macular degeneration: results of a randomized clinical trial. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1990b;108:816-824
13.
Macular Photocoagulation Study Group Argon laser photocoagulation for neovascular maculopathy: five-year results from randomized clinical trials. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1109-1114
14.
Macular Photocoagulation Study Group Laser photocoagulation of subfoveal neovascular lesions of age-related macular degeneration: updated findings from two clinical trials. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:1200-1209
15. National Advisory Eye Council (1984) Report of the Retinal and Choroidal Diseases Panel: Vision ResearchA National Plan: 19831987. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, MD.
16.
Newsome D. A., Swartz M., Leone N. C., Elston R. C., Millor E. Oral zinc in macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 1988;106:192-198
17. Rosenthal F., West S., Munoz B., Emmett E. A., Strickland P. T., Taylor H. R. Ocular and facial skin exposure to ultraviolet radiation in sunlight: a personal exposure model with application to a worker population. Health Physics 1991;61:77-86[Medline]
18. Sorsby A. (1966) Reports on Public Health and Medical Subjects. No. 114, Her Majestys Stationery Office, London.
19.
Sperduto R. D., Ferris F. L., Kurinij N. Do we have a nutritional treatment for age-related cataract or macular degeneration?. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1990;108:1403-1405
20.
Stampfer M. J., Hennekens C. H., Manson J. E., Colditz G. A., Rosner B., Willet W. C. Vitamin E consumption and the risk of coronary disease in women. N. Engl. J. Med. 1993;328:1444-1449
21. The Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group The Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS). Design implications. Control. Clin. Trials 1999;20:573-600
22. The National Eye Institute 25-Item Visual Function Questionaire (VFQ-25). Santa Monica, Calif; RAND, 1996.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y.-Z. Wang, E. Wilson, K. G. Locke, and A. O. Edwards Shape Discrimination in Age-Related Macular Degeneration Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2002; 43(6): 2055 - 2062. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. SOUBRANE and N. M BRESSLER Treatment of subfoveal choroidal neovascularisation in age related macular degeneration: focus on clinical application of verteporfin photodynamic therapy Br J Ophthalmol, April 1, 2001; 85(4): 483 - 495. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Hyun, J. H. Sohn, D. W. Ha, Y. H. Ahn, J.-Y. Koh, and Y. H. Yoon Depletion of Intracellular Zinc and Copper with TPEN Results in Apoptosis of Cultured Human Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2001; 42(2): 460 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||