![]() |
|
|
Station de Recherches Avicoles, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Centre de Tours-Nouzilly, 37380 Nouzilly, France
4To whom correspondence should be addressed.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: muscle protein turnover ambient temperature dietary protein chickens
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To our knowledge, in chickens as in other homeothermic species, few
investigations have been performed to investigate the impact of ambient
temperatures on protein metabolism. In rats, muscle protein synthesis
and degradation were increased by cold stress (Millward et al. 1983
). In young chicks (15-d-old), whole-body protein
turnover rates were increased by lowering ambient temperature from 30
to 20°C (Aoyagi et al. 1988
). Similarly, Hayashi et al. (1992)
reported in 15-d-old chicks that the rates of myofibrillar
protein turnover, estimated from 3-methylhistidine excretion, were
higher at 20 than at 30°C. In tube-fed chickens aged 2 to 3 wk,
muscle protein turnover rates (estimated from 3-methylhistidine
excretion) were also affected by ambient temperature (Yunianto et al. 1997
). Thus, environmental temperature influences both
protein synthesis and breakdown in chicks, even with equalized food
intake. However, protein metabolism has never been estimated in
individual skeletal muscles, which could respond differently.
We have recently shown (Temim et al. 1999
), in finishing
broilers, a significant effect of heat on muscle ribosomal capacities
(Cs)5
independently of feed intake. To extend these findings and to
understand the regulation of protein deposition in chickens subjected
to chronic heat exposure, we studied protein turnover in different
skeletal muscles and the potential effect of dietary crude protein
(25% vs. 20%) in these conditions. Protein synthesis and proteolysis
were measured in vivo in three skeletal muscles: the Pectoralis
major (breast muscle, entirely fast-twitch glycolytic fiber
type), the Gastrocnemius and the
Sartorius (leg muscles, mixed-fiber type).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Three hundred and fifty 1-d-old male broiler chicks (ISA JV15),
obtained from a local hatchery (Sicamen, Bouloire, France), were raised
conventionally in battery cages in controlled environment rooms. They
consumed water and a complete starter diet ad libitum (12.7 MJ
metabolizable energy/kg and 220 g crude protein/kg) for the first
28 d. The ambient temperature was reduced gradually from 32 to
26°C at 21 d of age. A relative humidity of ~55% and a
23 h light, 1 h dark cycle were maintained until the end of
the experiment. On d 28, birds were weighed after 4 h of food
deprivation and 168 were selected and divided into four experimental
groups of similar weight (1165 ± 12 g). They were then
placed into individual battery cages in controlled environment rooms
maintained at a constant temperature of either 22°C (thermoneutral
temperature) or 32°C (high temperature). They were provided free
access to a control (C) or a high-protein diet (HP) from 4 to 6 wk
of age. These two diets were isocaloric and had the same amino acid
proportions in relation to lysine content (compositions are given in
Table 1
). Growth performance was measured for each group (n = 2530) throughout the experimental period (from 28 to 42 d of
age). At 56 wk of age, five to six chicks, with growth performances
close to the group mean, were used to determine muscle characteristics
and rates of muscle protein turnover. All experiments were carried out
with due regard to legislation governing the ethical treatment of
animals, and investigators were certified by the French government for
carrying out animal experiments (n° 04601).
|
Protein fractional synthesis rates (FSR) were measured in vivo
according to the flooding-dose method (Garlick et al. 1980
and 1994). This method, previously validated in
chickens by Muramatsu and Okumura (1985), has been adapted in our
laboratory (Tesseraud et al. 1992
). At 20 min before
slaughter, birds that had not eaten for 4 to 6 h received a single
intravenous injection (0.8 mL/100 g body weight) of a
radioactive-phenylalanine solution (150 mmol/L; 1.671.85 kBq/L).
The plasma-free [3H]-phenylalanine specific
radioactivity in each group was at least 95% of that of the injected
phenylalanine. Just before slaughter, the birds were anesthetized with
1 mL of Pentobarbital (intravenous injection in the leg); then they
were decapitated and exsanguinated. Blood was collected in heparinized
tubes which were immediately centrifuged. The left Pectoralis
major, Sartorius and Gastrocnemius muscles
were quickly excised, weighed, frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at
-20°C until analysis.
Analytical methods.
Analytical procedures were described previously (Tesseraud et al. 1996
). Briefly, frozen tissues were finely pulverized in
liquid N2. The acid-soluble fraction
containing free amino acids was separated from the protein precipitate
(extraction in 0.2 mol/L-perchloric acid). The FSR were determined
using the measurements of the free and protein-bound phenylalanine
specific radioactivities after conversion into ß-phenylethylamine
(Garlick et al. 1980
). This compound was measured
fluorimetrically (SFM 25 fluorimeter; Kontron Instruments, St. Quentin
Yvelines, France) by a modification of the method of Suzuki and Yagi (1976)
and quantified for radioactivity by liquid-scintillation
counting (Tricarb 2300TR; Packard Instruments, Meriden, CT). Tissue
protein content was measured according to Smith et al. (1985)
by the
colorimetric reaction with bicinchoninic acid (Pierce, Rockford, IL).
Tissue RNA content was measured from the UV absorbance at 260 nm, with
a correction for peptide material based on the UV absorbance at 232 nm,
as described by Munro and Fleck (1969)
. The fractional protein growth
rates (FGR) were estimated from the increases in tissue-protein, as
described by McDonald and Swick (1981)
and Tesseraud et al. (1996)
.
Briefly, during the experimental period, the growth linearity was
verified for each experimental group, which allowed the correlation of
muscle protein content to body weight. The regressions (muscle protein
mass vs. body weight) were established for each group, and calculations
included the same five to six chicks per group used for synthesis
measurements and additional chicks killed 23 d before and after
protein synthesis measurements to better estimate muscle protein
deposition. The tissue protein gained per day was calculated for each
chick from its daily growth rate. This method provides a crude
estimation of muscle protein gain. Finally, the fractional breakdown
rates (FBR) were calculated as the difference between FSR and FGR.
For each studied muscle, absolute rates of protein turnover, i.e., the total amounts of protein synthesized, gained or degraded each day (ASR, AGR or ABR, respectively, in mg protein/d) were calculated by multiplying FSR, FGR or FBR by the muscle protein content present on the day of the experiment. The capacity for protein synthesis, i.e., ribosomal capacity (Cs, mg/g), was estimated as the RNA/protein ratio. The translational efficiency (kRNA) was determined by calculating the amount of protein synthesized daily (mg) per mg RNA.
Statistical methods.
Values are given as means with standard errors. The homogeneity of variance between treatments was verified by Bartletts test. Data were analyzed using a classical two-way ANOVA to study the effects of temperature (32 vs. 22°C), dietary crude protein (25 vs. 20%) and their interaction (StatView, 5.0 version; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). When the interaction was significant, a posthoc analysis (Student-Newman-Keuls test) was conducted to identify the difference among the groups. When not otherwise specified, the level of significance used was P < 0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Body weights and growth rates were significantly lower at 32 than at
22°C; ~ -16 and -40%, respectively, irrespective of diet
(Table 2
; P < 0.001). Muscle weights and protein and RNA
contents generally were also reduced in heat-exposed birds. These
reductions were more pronounced and were significant in the P.
major muscle (-25, -26 and -45%, for muscle weight, protein
and RNA contents, respectively; P < 0.001). RNA
contents were significantly lower at 32°C than at 22°C in the
Sartorius (-20%, P < 0.01) and
Gastrocnemius (-25%, P < 0.001) muscles.
When muscle weights were expressed relative to body weight (data not
shown), the proportion of P. major was lower in hot
conditions, ~ -10% (P < 0.01), whereas those of
the two leg muscles were significantly greater: +11% for
Sartorius (P < 0.05) and + 15% for
Gastrocnemius (P < 0.01).
|
Muscle protein turnover.
In the P. major muscle, chronic heat exposure significantly
(P < 0.001) depressed FSR (-35 and -45% for C and
HP diets, respectively), Cs (~ -25% for both diets), and kRNA (-10
and -25% for C and HP diets, respectively) (Table 3
). Similarly, the fractional rates of breakdown and gain were
significantly (P < 0.001) lower under hot conditions:
-45 and -60% for FBR and ~ -25% for FGR. The same result
was found when the protein turnover rates were expressed in absolute
rates: ASR, ABR and AGR were much lower at 32 than at 22°C (Table 3)
.
Because protein deposition was decreased less than protein synthesis,
the efficiency of protein deposition (100 x FGR/FSR) was greater in
heat-exposed chickens compared to chickens maintained at 22°C
(+15 and +37%, dependent on the diet; P < 0.01).
There was no significant interaction between temperature and diet, and
no significant diet effect for FSR and FBR. Conversely, there was an
interaction between temperature and diet for ASR (P < 0.05). Thus, ASR was increased in chickens fed the HP diet at 22°C
(+21%, P < 0.05), whereas it was not affected at
32°C. There was also a weak interaction between temperature and diet
for ABR (P = 0.06): ABR tended to be greater in
chickens fed the HP diet at 22°C (+23%, P = 0.09)
but not at 32°C. Therefore, independent of the variation in protein
turnover, the HP diet improved protein deposition in the P.
major muscle.
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In the present experiment, breeding conditions and experimental
procedures were selected based on previous studies (Geraert et al. 1996a
, b
). The effect of chronic heat exposure was
investigated by comparing two ambient temperatures (22 or 32°C)
maintained for 2 wk. We used chickens in the finishing period (4- to
6-wk-old), during which they are more sensitive to higher ambient
temperatures than younger birds. Under these conditions, and as
expected, the negative effect of high environmental temperatures on
growth performance was observed, as previously reported (Austic 1985
, Geraert 1991
, Geraert et al. 1996a
, Temim et al. 1999
). Moreover, chronic
heat exposure significantly altered the weight of the P.
major muscle, with a decrease in both protein and RNA contents.
When expressed as a percentage of body weight, the proportion of the
P. major was lower (P < 0.01) at 32°C
than at 22°C but those of the Sartorius and
Gastrocnemius were higher (P < 0.05;
P < 0.01, respectively). Aïn Baziz et al. (1996)
had observed a similar decrease in the proportion of breast
muscle, with a significant increase in proportion of leg muscles in
birds exposed to hot conditions. A reduced breast meat yield was also
found by Howlider and Rose (1989)
.
In this study, we attempted to understand the regulation of muscle
protein deposition under warm conditions. In chronic heat-exposure
experiments, the choice of appropriate control chickens is difficult to
solve because of the heat-related decrease in food intake. To
abolish the effect of food-intake reduction, two alternative
techniques could be used: pair- or tube-feeding. Unfortunately,
these both induce a diurnal cycling, with successive postprandial and
postabsorptive states, i.e., short-term fasting. In addition, it is
well-established that skeletal muscle protein synthesis is highly
sensitive to short-term variation in supply (Grizard et al. 1995
) and, as this measurement is performed at a precise chosen
time, feeding ad libitum was preferred in our study. Furthermore, using
the same experimental model, we previously found that the reduced food
intake did not explain the whole effect of high temperature on growth
performance, nitrogen retention and ribosomal capacity (Temim et al. 1999
), i.e., there was probably a direct effect of heat
exposure on these parameters. Now we have clearly shown that the
fractional rates of protein synthesis are depressed by chronic heat
exposure in the three muscles studied (P < 0.001
for P. major and Gastrocnemius;
P < 0.01 for Sartorius). The
depression in FSR was principally related to a reduced capacity for
protein synthesis (~ -20%; P < 0.01), i.e.,
RNA content was lowered more than protein by heat stress. Translational
efficiency was not significantly altered by heat exposure for the leg
muscles but was for the breast tissue. The calculated fractional rate
of proteolysis was clearly decreased by the hot environment at least in
P. major (P < 0.001) and
Sartorius (P < 0.01). So, under
these conditions, muscle protein turnover was lower in heat-exposed
chickens compared to those maintained at thermoneutrality. These
declines in both protein synthesis and breakdown are consistent with
earlier studies performed on younger birds (Aoyagi et al. 1988
, Hayashi et al. 1992
, Yunianto et al. 1997
). In these previous studies, significant decreases in
rates of whole-body or muscle protein turnover occurred when the
ambient temperature was increased from ~20 to 3032°C. However, in
the current experiment, we have shown that the response in protein
metabolism to heat exposure depends on the muscle studied. First, the
P. major muscle was more sensitive to high ambient
temperatures than the Sartorius and
Gastrocnemius muscles. These differential responses may
relate to the energy characteristics of these muscles and their
fiber-type composition: entirely fast-twitch glycolytic fibers
for P. major; mixed fiber-type for the
Sartorius and Gastrocnemius muscles.
Second, for P. major and Gastrocnemius
muscles, protein synthesis was more affected than proteolysis under hot
conditions, resulting in a lower protein deposition. Conversely, in the
Sartorius muscle, the heat-related decrease in
protein gain was not observed.
In the present study, increasing dietary protein content significantly
improved muscle FGR: significant diet effect for the P.
major muscle and significantly greater values in chickens fed
the HP diet than in chickens fed the C diet, at least in hot
conditions, for the Sartorius and
Gastrocnemius muscles. This beneficial effect of the HP
diet at 32°C is probably related to a reduced muscle protein
breakdown. This observation needs to be confirmed using more direct
measurements of proteolysis. In any case, at 32°C the HP diet did not
significantly affect either FSR, Cs or kRNA, irrespective of muscles
studied, although it compensated the heat-related reduction in
protein intake: ~30.5 g protein/d both at 32°C with the HP diet and
at 22°C with the C diet compared to 22.5 g protein/d at 32°C
with the C diet. It may be surprising that the HP diet did not
stimulate protein synthesis since this stands in contrast with data
obtained under thermoneutral conditions. Indeed, when dietary protein
supply was lower than the protein requirement, increasing protein
intake improves skeletal muscle FSR in rats (Jepson et al. 1988
).
It has been clearly demonstrated that an acute heat stress affects
protein synthesis, i.e., changes in ribosomal gene transcription
leading to lower protein synthesis capacity (Jacob 1995
). However, prolonged heat treatment could result in some
degree of thermotolerance and in a different regulation of protein
synthesis. The mechanisms underlying muscle protein synthesis
reductions following chronic heat exposure have not yet been
established. It is worthwhile to note that in warm ambient
temperatures, several metabolic and hormonal parameters are altered and
they may in part contribute to the protein turnover changes. First, the
reduction in protein synthesis might involve the depressed plasma amino
acid concentrations observed at high ambient temperatures, particularly
for the branched-chain and sulfur amino acids plus glutamine
(Geraert et al. 1996b
). However, in our study, the
heat-related decrease in muscle protein synthesis was not enhanced
by increasing dietary protein content. Second, the lower muscle protein
synthesis might originate from a failure in the energy supply to the
muscle under hot conditions. Peripheral glucose uptake by muscles may
be reduced; this would affect the glycolytic P. major
muscle more, and this is where the largest effects on protein synthesis
were noted. Finally, the heat-induced changes in endocrine profiles
or in sensitivity to exogenous insulin (Geraert et al. 1996b
) may contribute to a significant modification in the
hormonal control of protein metabolism. In addition,
hot-temperature conditions decreased plasma triiodothyronine
concentrations and increased plasma corticosterone, factors which are
known to reduce protein deposition through alterations in protein
turnover in birds and other species (Grizard et al. 1995
, Yunianto et al. 1997
).
In conclusion, in finishing broiler chickens, chronic heat exposure induced a marked decrease in protein synthesis rates, as measured directly in different muscles. This was mainly related to a lower ribosomal capacity. Muscle protein turnover was lower under hot conditions than at thermoneutrality. At 32°C, protein synthesis was more affected than proteolysis, at least in the P. major and the Gastrocnemius muscles, thereby reducing muscle protein deposition. Increasing dietary protein intake under high ambient temperatures generally improved muscle protein gain, without any change in protein synthesis rate, ribosomal capacity or translational efficiency. The underlying mechanisms involved in the regulation of muscle protein turnover by nutrients and ambient temperatures require more investigation at the cellular and molecular levels.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Funded by SYPRAM (France), an association
created by the Association pour le maintien de lélevage en
Bretagne, the Syndicat National des Industriels de la Nutrition
Animale and the Syndicat des coopératives dAliments
Composés. ![]()
3 Supported by grant from: Ministère de lEnseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique dAlgérie. ![]()
5 Abbreviations used: ABR, absolute breakdown rate; AGR, absolute growth rate; ASR, absolute synthesis rate; C diet,
control diet; Cs, capacity for protein synthesis; FBR, fractional
breakdown rate; FGR, fractional growth rate; FSR, fractional synthesis
rate; HP diet, high-protein diet; kRNA, translational efficiency. ![]()
Manuscript received September 27, 1999.
Initial review completed November 7, 1999.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Aïn Baziz H., Geraert P. A., Padilha J. C. F., Guillaumin S. Chronic heat exposure enhances fat deposition and modifies muscle and fat partition in broiler carcasses. Poult. Sci. 1996;75:505-513[Medline]
2. Alleman F., Leclercq B. Effect of dietary protein and environmental temperature on growth performance and water consumption of male broiler chickens. Br. Poult. Sci. 1997;38:607-610[Medline]
3. Aoyagi A., Tasaki I., Okumura J. I., Muramatsu T. Effect of low ambient temperature on protein turnover and heat production in chicks. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1988;89A(3):433-436
4. Austic R. E. Feeding poultry in hot and cold climates. Youssef M. K. eds. Stress Physiology in Livestock 1985:123-136 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL.
5. Cahaner A., Pinchasov Y., Nir I., Nitsan Z. Effects of dietary protein under high ambient temperature on body weight, breast meat yield and abdominal fat deposition of broiler stocks differing in growth rate and fatness. Poult. Sci. 1995;74:968-975[Medline]
6.
Garlick P. J., McNurlan M. A., Essen P., Wernerman J. Measurements of tissue protein synthesis rates in vivo: critical analysis of contrasting methods. Am. J. Physiol. 1994;266:E287-E297
7. Garlick P. J., McNurlan M. A., Preedy V. R. A rapid and convenient technique for measuring the rate of protein synthesis in tissues by injection of [3H]-Phe. Biochem. J. 1980;192:719-723[Medline]
8. Geraert P. A. Energy metabolism of broilers under hot environmental conditions (in French). INRA Prod. Anim. 1991;4:257-267
9. Geraert P. A., Padilha J. C. F., Guillaumin S. Metabolic and endocrine changes induced by chronic heat exposure in broiler chickens: growth performance, body composition and energy retention. Br. J. Nutr. 1996a;75:195-204[Medline]
10. Geraert P. A., Padilha J. C. F., Guillaumin S. Metabolic and endocrine changes induced by chronic heat exposure in broiler chickens: biological and endocrinological variables. Br. J. Nutr. 1996b;75:205-216[Medline]
11. Grizard J., Dardevet D., Papet I., Mosoni L., Patureau-Mirand P., Attaix D., Tauveron I., Bonin D., Arnal M. Nutrient regulation of skeletal muscle protein metabolism in animals. The involvement of hormones and substrates. Nutr. Res. Rev. 1995;8:67-91
12. Hayashi K., Kaneda S., Otsuka A., Tomita Y. Effects of ambient temperature and thyroxine on protein turnover and oxygen consumption in chicken squeletal muscle. Mulder R. eds. Proceeding 19th Worlds Poultry Congress 1992;vol. 2:93-96 Ponsen & Looijen Amsterdam.
13. Howlider M.A.R., Rose S. P. Rearing temperature and the meat yield of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 1989;30:61-67
14. Jacob S. T. Regulation of ribosomal gene transcription. Biochem. J. 1995;306:617-626
15. Jepson M. M., Bates P. C., Millward D. J. The role of insulin and thyroid hormones in the regulation of muscle growth and protein turnover in response to dietary protein in the rat. Br. J. Nutr. 1988;59:397-415[Medline]
16. McDonald M. L., Swick R. W. The effect of protein depletion and repletion on muscle-protein turnover in the chick. Biochem. J. 1981;194:811-819[Medline]
17. Millward D. J., Bates P. C., de Benoist B., Brown J. G., Cox M., Halliday D., Odedra B., Rennie M. J. Protein turnover: the nature of the phenomenon and its physiological regulation. Arnal M. Pion R. Bonin D. eds. Proceeding 4th International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition 1983;vol. 1:69-96 INRA Publications Paris.
18. Munro H. N., Fleck A. Analysis of tissues and body fluids for nitrogenous constituents. Munro H. N. eds. Mammalian Protein Metabolism 1969;vol. 3:424-525 Academic Press New York.
19. Muramatsu T., Okumura J. Whole-body protein turnover in chicks at early stages of growth. J. Nutr. 1985;115:483-490
20. National Research Council Nutrient Requirements of Poultry 9th rev. ed. 1994 National Academy Press Washington, D.C.
21. Smith P. K., Krohn R. I., Hermanson G. T., Mallia A. K., Gartner F. H., Provenzano M. D., Fujimoto E. K., Goeke N. M., Olson B. J., Klenk D. C. Measurements of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal. Biochem. 1985;150:76-85[Medline]
22. Suzuki O., Yagi K. A fluorimetric assay for phenylethylamine in rat brain. Anal. Biochem. 1976;75:192-200[Medline]
23. Temim S., Chagneau A. M., Guillaumin S., Michel J., Peresson J., Geraert P. A., Tesseraud S. Effects of chronic heat exposure and protein intake on growth performance, nitrogen retention and muscle development in broiler chickens. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1999;39:145-156
24. Tesseraud S., Larbier M., Chagneau A. M., Geraert P. A. Effects of dietary lysine on muscle protein turnover in growing chickens. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1992;32:163-175
25. Tesseraud S., Peresson R., Lopes J., Chagneau A. M. Dietary lysine deficiency greatly affects muscle and liver protein turnover in growing chickens. Br. J. Nutr. 1996;75:853-865[Medline]
26. Waldroup P. W. Influence of environmental temperature on protein and amino acid needs of poultry. Fed. Proc. 1982;41:2821-2823[Medline]
27. Waldroup P. W., Mitchell R. J., Payne J. R., and Hazen K. R. Performance of chicks fed diets formulated to minimize excess levels of essential amino acids. Poult. Sci. 1976;55:243-253[Medline]
28. Yunianto V. D., Hayashi K., Kaneda S., Ohtsuka A., Tomita Y. Effect of environmental temperature on muscle protein turnover and heat production in tube-fed broiler chickens. Br. J. Nutr. 1997;77:897-909[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Gao, H. Lin, Z. G. Song, and H. C. Jiao Corticosterone Alters Meat Quality by Changing Pre-and Postslaughter Muscle Metabolism Poult. Sci., August 1, 2008; 87(8): 1609 - 1617. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Garriga, R. R. Hunter, C. Amat, J. M. Planas, M. A. Mitchell, and M. Moreto Heat stress increases apical glucose transport in the chicken jejunum Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, January 1, 2006; 290(1): R195 - R201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||