Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vezzani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Samanin, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vezzani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Samanin, R.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2000;130:1046S-1048S.)
© 2000 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Supplement

Modulatory Role of Neuropeptides in Seizures Induced in Rats by Stimulation of Glutamate Receptors1

Annamaria Vezzani2, Massimo Rizzi, Mirko Conti and Rosario Samanin

Department of Neuroscience, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Milan, Italy

2To whom correspondence should be addressed.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Stimulation of glutamate receptors has been reported to modulate the expression of neuropeptides and their receptors in neurons. On the other hand, neuropeptides are known to regulate the presynaptic glutamate release and neuronal responses to excitatory neurotransmission. This evidence indicates a functional interaction between glutamatergic and neuropeptidergic transmission in the central nervous system (CNS). In this report, we provide pharmacologic evidence in experimental models of seizures, suggesting that somatostatin (SRIF) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) are endogenous modulators of glutamate-mediated hyperexcitability in the CNS. Electroencephalographic (EEG) and behavioral seizures were induced in rats by intrahippocampal or systemic injection of kainic acid, a glutamate analog. The number of EEG seizures and their total duration were inhibited significantly by intracerebral application of a SRIF1 receptor agonist. Similarly, kainate seizures were reduced by N[-2-(diphenylacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl-D-arginamide] (BIBP 3226), a NPY Y1 receptor antagonist. Enhanced seizure susceptibility to pentylentetrazol, ensuing in rats after a systemic administration of kainic acid, was reduced significantly by intracerebral application of RC 160, a SRIF1 receptor agonist, or NPY 13–36, a Y2/Y5 receptor agonist. This evidence suggests that neuropeptide analogs may be of value for controlling seizures and possibly in other pathologic conditions associated with excessive glutamate function.


KEY WORDS: • somatostatin receptors • neuropeptide Y receptors • epilepsy • neuropeptide Y • somatostatin • rats


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Various neuropeptides have been identified in the central nervous system (CNS)3 where they coexist primarily with classical neurotransmitters (Hökfelt 1980Citation ). Functional evidence suggests that some neuropeptides act by inhibiting or facilitating classical neurotransmitter functions (Hökfelt 1980Citation ). In particular, recent evidence suggests that somatostatin (SRIF) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) affect synaptic transmission and neuronal excitability and that these effects are mediated significantly by their interaction with glutamatergic neurotransmission (Epelbaum 1986Citation , Mancillas et al. 1986Citation , Olpe et al. 1980Citation , Vezzani et al. 1999Citation ). Because an increase in glutamatergic function is involved in both seizure initiation and propagation in the CNS (Schwarcz and Meldrum 1985Citation ), it is of interest to investigate the functional role of SRIF and NPY in epilepsy and whether pharmacologic modifications of peptidergic function may control seizures by reducing glutamate action.

Recent electrophysiologic and biochemical findings have indeed shown that SRIF may act presynaptically by reducing glutamate release at hippocampal synapses (Boehm and Betz 1997Citation ), as well as postsynaptically by depressing glutamate responses and baseline firing (Mancillas et al. 1986Citation ). These inhibitory effects appear to be mediated by the SRIF1 family of receptors (Hoyer et al. 1995Citation ). Similarly, NPY reduces glutamate release acting on presynaptic Y2 receptors (Klapstein and Colmers 1993Citation ), whereas an excitatory component of NPY appears to be mediated by postsynaptic Y1 receptor subtypes (Brooks et al. 1987Citation , Gariboldi et al. 1998Citation ).

Seizures in experimental models and humans profoundly affect the functional status of neuropeptide-containing neurons particularly those neurons that also contain {gamma}-aminobutyric acid (GABA) (DeLanerolle et al. 1989Citation , Schwarzer et al. 1996Citation , Sloviter, 1991Citation ) and induce the ectopic expression of NPY in glutamatergic granule cells of the dentate gyrus (Schwarzer et al. 1996Citation , Sperk et al. 1992Citation ).

In this report, we describe the pharmacologic evidence showing that SRIF and NPY analogs, acting on specific receptor subtypes, inhibit seizures induced by glutamate receptor stimulation. This suggests that selective ligands for neuropeptide receptors may be of value for controlling excessive glutamate function.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Experimental animals.

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (225–250 g, Charles River, Calco, Italy) were used. Procedures involving animals and their care conformed with the institutional guidelines, in compliance with national and international laws and policies.

Electrode implantation, EEG recording and intracerebral injection of drugs.

Surgical procedures for electrodes and injection cannula implantation have been described elsewhere (Vezzani et al. 1991Citation ). The procedures for recording the EEG and the intracerebral injection of drugs in unanesthetized rats have been described (Vezzani et al. 1991Citation ). Kainic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO; 0.04 µg in 0.5 µL 0.1 mol/L PBS, pH 7.4) was infused (60 s) into the dorsal hippocampus in the region of granule cells. This was the smallest dose found to induce EEG seizures in all of the animals (Vezzani et al. 1991Citation ). Seizures consisted of high frequency and/or multispike complexes and/or high voltage synchronized spike or wave activity in cortical and hippocampal leads and provided a sensitive measure of the anticonvulsant activity of drugs (Vezzani et al. 1991Citation ). EEG recordings were made for at least 30 min to assess the spontaneous EEG pattern representing a control baseline period, then continuously for at least 180 min after kainic acid. Seizures were quantified by calculating the latency to the first seizure, the total number of seizures and the total time spent in seizures (the duration of all ictal episodes) during the EEG recording period.

Systemic injection of kainic acid and evaluation of seizures.

Kainic acid or saline was injected subcutaneously into rats at a dose of 12 mg/kg. Rats showing repeated episodes of severe generalized limbic seizures with rearing and/or loss of postural control during the 3 h after drug injection were selected for further studies. These rats were tested for their increase in seizure susceptibility 30 d after kainic acid injection. A normally subconvulsive dose of pentylentetrazol (30 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) was injected into rats and their behavior observed for 30 min. Myoclonic (all body twitch) convulsions were counted separately from generalized tonic-clonic seizures (tonic-clonichindlimb extension with loss of posture). The onset time to the first seizure episode was also measured (Vezzani et al. 1994Citation ).

Schedule of treatment with peptide analogs.

N-2-(diphenylacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl-D-arginamide] (BIBP 3226) (Rudolf et al. 1994Citation ; Dr. Karl Thomae GmbH, Biberach an der Riss, Germany) (5 and 10 µg in 1 µL) was dissolved in 25% polyethyleneglycol and infused intrahippocampally at the same site as kainic acid, 10 min before the convulsant. Octreotide (SMS 201–995; Novartis Pharma, Basel, Switzerland; 2.5–20 µg/L) was dissolved in PBS and infused intrahippocampally at the same site as kainic acid (in 0.5 µL) or in the ipsilateral entorhinal cortex (2 µL) 10 min before the convulsant. Seglitide (RC-160; RBI, Natick; 6 µg in 1 µL) and NPY 13–36 (Sigma-Aldrich; 50 µg in 10 µL) were dissolved in saline and infused into the hippocampus or given intracerebroventricularly, respectively, 15 min before pentylentetrazol. Controls received corresponding amounts of vehicles before the convulsants.

After the experiments, the position of the electrodes and the track of the injection needle were checked visually in cryostat brain sections from each rat.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Table 1Citation shows the anticonvulsant effects of BIBP 3226, a selective NPY Y1 receptor antagonist (Rudolf et al. 1994Citation ) and of SMS 201–995, an agonist at SRIF1 receptors (Reubi 1985Citation ), on EEG seizures induced by intrahippocampal kainic acid in rats. EEG seizures were measured in this study because they have been found to be the most significant, reproducible and quantifiable of the epilepsy-like sequelae after kainic acid administration in the rat hippocampus. EEG seizures provide a sensitive measure of the anticonvulsant activity of drugs (Vezzani et al. 1991Citation ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of BIBP 3226 (a Y1 antagonist) and SMS 201-995 (an SRIF1 agonist) on seizures induced by intrahippocampal administration of 0.04 µg kainic acid in rats12

 
BIBP 3226 (10 µg in 0.5 µL) significantly reduced the number of seizures and the time spent in seizures by two thirds (P < 0.01). BIBP 3226 (5 µg) decreased the time spent in seizures by 50% (P < 0.05), without significantly modifying the other seizure variables (data not shown). A similar, though less pronounced protective effect was achieved by injecting SMS 201–995 (5 µg in 0.5 µL) into the hippocampus. Thus, the number of seizures and their total duration were reduced by one third and one half, respectively (P < 0.05). Doses <5 µg were ineffective (not shown). SMS 201–995 reduced kainate-induced seizures more notably when administered into the entorhinal cortex ipsilateral to the kainate injected hippocampus (though at a higher dose). Seizure parameters were reduced significantly by 60 and 75%, respectively (P < 0.01; see Table 1Citation ). The onset time to seizures was delayed significantly by BIBP 3226 (kainic acid, 12 ± 0.3 min; BIBP 3226, 33.4 ± 5.4 min, P < 0.01) and by 20 µg, but not 10 µg, SMS 201 995 in the entorhinal cortex (SMS 201–995, 39.8 ± 6.9 min, P < 0.01).

Table 2Citation shows the effects of NPY 13–36 and RC 160, which act as agonists at NPY Y2/Y5 and SRIF1 (Reubi 1985Citation ) receptors (Michel et al. 1998Citation ), respectively, on the enhanced susceptibility to pentylenetetrazol seizures ensuing in rats 30 d after a systemic administration of kainic acid (Vezzani et al. 1994Citation ). Each compound reduced seizure susceptibility significantly by decreasing the number of rats showing tonic-clonic seizures (i.e., RC 160) or by increasing the number of rats without seizures (i.e., NPY 13–36). NPY 13–36 also significantly delayed the time to onset of seizures (P < 0.05).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of neuropeptide Y (NPY) 13-36 (a Y2/Y5 agonist) and seglitide (RC 160) (an SRIF1 agonist) on chronically enhanced susceptibility to pentylenetetrazol-induced seizures

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our results indicate that stimulation of SRIF1 and NPY Y2/Y5 receptors using preferential agonists reduces acute seizures and the chronically enhanced predisposition to generalized convulsions in rats. In addition, protection from acute seizures can be achieved by blocking NPY Y1 receptors selectively. Seizures in these models depend significantly on increased glutamatergic neurotransmission. Thus, our findings support previous electrophysiologic and biochemical evidence showing that SRIF and NPY interact functionally with glutamate in CNS.

SRIF has been reported to depress glutamate responses as well as baseline firing in both rat cortex and hippocampus (Mancillas et al. 1986Citation ) and to inhibit glutamate release acting on SRIF1 presynaptic receptors in the hippocampus (Boehm and Betz 1997Citation ). Similarly, NPY, acting on presynaptic Y2 receptors on glutamatergic terminals, reduces glutamate release in a highly selective manner (Greber et al. 1994Citation , Klapstein and Colmers 1993Citation ). These effects appear to be mediated by changes in Ca2+ entry through voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (Boehm and Betz 1997Citation , Klapstein and Colmers, 1993Citation ) and by modifications in K+ currents (Moore et al. 1988Citation , Vezzani et al. 1999Citation ). Seizure protection by NPY Y1 antagonists may be achieved by blockade of an excitatory component mediated by the endogenous peptide, [i.e., a reduction of Ca2+-dependent K+ currents by NPY acting on postsynaptic Y1 receptors on glutamatergic neurons (Gobbi et al. 1996Citation , McQuiston 1996Citation ) would enhance neuronal excitability].

Recent evidence has shown that glutamate, in turn, affects neuropeptide-expressing neurons and their receptors. Thus, the synthesis of SRIF and NPY in cortical and hippocampal neurons and the release of these peptides are enhanced by stimulation of metabotropic and/or ionotropic glutamate receptors using selective agonists (Fontana et al. 1996Citation , Gemignani et al. 1997Citation , Greber et al. 1994Citation ). Changes in NPY receptor subtypes, similar to those occurring after seizures (Vezzani et al. 1999Citation ), are induced by glutamate analogs acting at metabotropic receptors (Schwarzer et al. 1998Citation ). These findings suggest that the plastic changes in NPY and SRIF receptors (Peréz et al. 1995Citation , Piwko et al. 1996Citation , Vezzani et al. 1999Citation ) and the functional and morphological alteration in peptidergic neurons found in epileptic brain tissue of experimental models and humans (DeLanerolle et al. 1989Citation , Schwarzer et al. 1996Citation , Sperk et al. 1992Citation ) are mediated by glutamate released during seizures.

Because SRIF, NPY and glutamate appear to be linked functionally, changes in peptidergic transmission likely play a significant role in modulating neuronal excitability that is altered in epilepsy. This suggests that SRIF and NPY analogs may provide novel pharmacologic tools for controlling excessive glutamate function.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Presented at the International Symposium on Glutamate, October 12–14, 1998 at the Clinical Center for Rare Diseases Aldo e Cele Daccó, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research, Bergamo, Italy. The symposium was sponsored jointly by the Baylor College of Medicine, the Center for Nutrition at the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, the Monell Chemical Senses Center, the International Union of Food Science and Technology, and the Center for Human Nutrition; financial support was provided by the International Glutamate Technical Committee. The proceedings of the symposium are published as a supplement to The Journal of Nutrition. Editors for the symposium publication were John D. Fernstrom, the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, and Silvio Garattini, the Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research. Back

3 Abbreviations used: BIBP 3226, N-2-(diphenylacetyl)-N-[(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl-D-arginamide]; CNS, central nervous system; EEG, electroencephalographic; GABA, {gamma}-aminobutyric acid; NPY, neuropeptide Y; RC-160, seglitide; SMS 201–995, octreotide; SRIF, somatostatin. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

1. Boehm S., Betz H. Somatostatin inhibits excitatory transmission at rat hippocampal synapses via presynaptic receptors. J. Neurosci. 1997;17:4066-4075[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Brooks P. A., Kelly J. S., Allen J. M., Smith D.A.S., Stone T. W. Direct excitatory effects of neuropeptide Y (NPY) on rat hippocampal neurons in vitro. Brain Res 1987;408:295-298[Medline]

3. DeLanerolle N. C., Kim J. H., Robbins R. J., Spencer D. D. Hippocampal interneuron loss and plasticity in human temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain Res 1989;495:387-395[Medline]

4. Epelbaum J. Somatostatin in the central nervous system: physiology and pathological modifications. Prog. Neurobiol. 1986;27:63-100[Medline]

5. Fontana G., De Bernardi R., Ferro F., Gemignani A., Raiteri M. Characterization of the glutamate receptors mediating release of somatostatin from cultured hippocampal neurons. J. Neurochem. 1996;66:161-168[Medline]

6. Gariboldi M., Conti M., Cavaleri D., Samanin R., Vezzani A. Anticonvulsant properties of BIBP 3226, a non-peptide selective antagonist at neuropeptide Y Y1 receptors. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1998;10:757-759[Medline]

7. Gemignani A., Marchese S., Fontana G., Raiteri M. Neuropeptide Y release from cultured hippocampal neurons: stimulation by glutamate acting at N-methyl-D-aspartate and AMPA receptors. Neuroscience 1997;81:23-31[Medline]

8. Gobbi M., Monhemius R., Samanin R., Mennini T., Vezzani A. Cellular localization of neuropeptide Y receptors in the rat hippocampus: long-term effects of limbic seizures. NeuroReport 1996;7:1475-1480[Medline]

9. Greber S., Schwarzer C., Sperk G. Neuropeptide Y inhibits potassium-stimulated glutamate release through Y2 receptors in rat hippocampal slices in vitro. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1994;113:737-740[Medline]

10. Hökfelt T., Johansson O., Ljungdahl A., Lundberg J. M., Schultzberg M. Peptidergic neurones. Nature (Lond.) 1980;284:515-521[Medline]

11. Hoyer D., Bell G. I., Berelowitz M., Feniuk W., Humphrey P.P.A., O’Carroll A. M., Patel Y. C. Classification and nomenclature of somatostatin receptors. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 1995;16:86-88[Medline]

12. Klapstein G. J., Colmers W. F. On the site of presynaptic inhibition by neuropeptide Y in the rat hippocampus in vitro. Hippocampus 1993;3:103-112[Medline]

13. Mancillas J. R., Siggins G. R., Bloom F. E. Somatostatin selectively enhances acetylcholine-induced excitations in rat hippocampus and cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1986;83:7518-7521[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. McQuiston R. A., Petrozzino J. J., Connor J. A., Colmers W. Neuropeptide Y1 receptors inhibit N-type calcium currents and reduce transient calcium increases in rat dentate granule cells. J. Neurosci. 1996;16:1422-1429[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Michel M. C., Beck-Sickinger A., Cox H., Doods H. N., Herzog H., Larhammar D., Quirion R., Schwartz T., Westfall T. XVI. International Union of Pharmacology recommendations for the nomenclature of neuropeptide Y, peptide YY, and pancreatic polypeptide receptors. Pharmacol. Rev. 1998;50:143-150[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Moore S. D., Madamba S. G., Joels M., Siggins G. R. Somatostatin augments the M-current in hippocampal neurons. Science (Washington DC) 1988;239:278-280[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Olpe H. R., Balcar V. J., Bittiger H., Rink H., Sieber P. Central actions of somatostatin. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1980;63:127-133[Medline]

18. Peréz J., Vezzani A., Civenni G., Tutka P., Rizzi M., Schupbach E., Hoyer D. Functional effects of D-Phe-c-(Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Lys-Val-Cys)-Trp-NH2 and differential changes in somatostatin receptor messenger RNAs, binding sites and somatostatin release in kainic acid-treated rats. Neuroscience 1995;65:1087-1097[Medline]

19. Piwko C., Thoss V. S., Samanin R., Hoyer D., Vezzani A. Status of somatostatin receptor messenger RNAs and binding sites in rat brain during kindling epileptogenesis. Neuroscience 1996;75:857-868[Medline]

20. Reubi J. C. New specific radioligand for one subpopulation of brain somatostatin receptors. Life Sci 1985;36:1829-1836[Medline]

21. Rudolf K., Eberlein W., Engel W., Wieland H., Willim K. D., Entzeroth M., Wienen W. The first highly potent and selective non-peptide neuropeptide Y Y1 receptor antagonist: BIBP 3226. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1994;271:R11-R13[Medline]

22. Schwarcz R., Meldrum B. Excitatory amino acid antagonists provide a therapeutic approach to neurological disorders. Lancet 1985;2:140-143[Medline]

23. Schwarzer C., Kirchmair E., Sperk G. Metabotropic receptors mediate activation of NPY-Y2 receptor expression in rat dentate gyrus. NeuroReport 1998;9:2347-2351[Medline]

24. Schwarzer C., Sperk G., Samanin R., Rizzi M., Gariboldi M., Vezzani A. Neuropeptides-immunoreactivity and their mRNA expression in kindling: functional implications for limbic epileptogenesis. Brain Res. Rev. 1996;22:27-50[Medline]

25. Sloviter R. S. Permanently altered hippocampal structure, excitability, and inhibition after experimental status epilepticus in the rat: the "dormant basket cell" hypothesis and its possible relevance to temporal lobe epilepsy. Hippocampus 1991;1:41-66[Medline]

26. Sperk G., Marksteiner J., Gruber B., Bellman R., Mahata M., Ortler M. Functional changes in neuropeptide Y and somatostatin containing neurons induced by limbic seizures in the rat. Neuroscience 1992;50:831-846[Medline]

27. Vezzani A., Civenni G., Rizzi M., Monno A., Messali S., Samanin R. Enhanced neuropeptide Y release in the hippocampus is associated with chronic seizure susceptibility in kainic acid treated rats. Brain Res 1994;660:138-143[Medline]

28. Vezzani A., Serafini R., Stasi M. A., Vigano G., Rizzi M., Samanin R. A peptidase-resistant cyclic octapeptide analogue of somatostatin (SMS 201–995) modulates seizures induced by quinolinic and kainic acids differently in the rat hippocampus. Neuropharmacology 1991;30:345-352[Medline]

29. Vezzani A., Sperk G., Colmers W. F. Neuropeptide Y: emerging evidence for a functional role in seizure modulation. Trends Neurosci 1999;22:25-30[Medline]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vezzani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Samanin, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vezzani, A.
Right arrow Articles by Samanin, R.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2000 by American Society for Nutrition