![]() |
|
|
Reproductive Endocrinology Center, Department of Ob/Gyn and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0556
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: monosodium glutamate arcuate nucleus median eminence glutamate receptor CD1 mouse
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA)
selective glutamate receptor (GluR) channels (Ankacrona et al. 1995
Regions of the brain most susceptible to glutamate exposure are the
specialized neurohemal contact zones found at several sites between the
cerebral ventricles and the external surface of the brain (Olney 1979
, Weindl and Joynt 1972
). These highly
vascularized areas sit outside the blood-brain barrier, which is
formed at their inner surfaces by tight junctions between the modified
astroglial cells called tanycytes lining their ventricular boundaries.
Most sensitive among them is the median eminence (ME), which receives
axon terminals from the nearby arcuate nucleus (ARC) and other
hypothalamic neurosecretory neurons. The fenestrated capillary
endothelium of the ME renders it totally accessible to plasma-borne
amino acids, so that initial glutamate-induced neuronal damage most
likely results from circulating levels rather than cerebroventricular
pools.
The ARC-ME region of the early postnatal rodent has often been used
for studies of monosodium glutamate (MSG) neurotoxicity
(Holzwarth-McBride et al. 1976
, Olney 1979
, Reynolds et al. 1976
, Takasaki et al. 1979
) because of its heightened responsiveness, consistent
cytoarchitecture and conspicuous anatomical landmarks (Heywood and Worden 1979
, Olney 1979
, Weindl and Joynt 1972
). Although the tanycytic framework is already
established in neonatal mice, ARC and other neuronal axons continue to
invade the ME during the first 25 d of postnatal life
(Eurenius and Jarskar 1971
). Administration of high
doses of MSG to immature infants causes no obvious harm to tanycytes or
ME axon terminals, but neurons in the ARC nucleus can be severely
damaged, with most deteriorating within 6 h
(Holzwarth-McBride et al. 1976
, Olney 1979
, Reynolds et al. 1976
). Because many early
studies employed excessive and destructive amounts of MSG, however,
little was learned about the events leading to neuronal death. To help
understand mechanisms involved in selective neuronal injury during this
developmental period, we investigated the effects after exposure to low
but deleterious amounts of MSG in the maximally sensitive 7-d-old
postnatal mouse (Takasaki et al. 1979
). The aims of
these studies were as follows: 1) to determine peak blood
glutamate levels after subcutaneous injection of a
minimum-effective glutamate dose-range; 2) to
characterize the pattern of arcuate neuronal damage in relation to
increasing glutamate exposure; and 3) to evaluate our
hypothesis that ventral ARC damage occurs if the ventral ARC-ME
tanycytes are exposed to effective glutamate concentrations for a
sufficient length of time. A report of some of these studies was
published previously (Hu et al. 1998
).
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The experimental protocols here were reviewed and approved by the
Committee on Animal Research at the University of California, San
Francisco (Approval #A54710644), and were performed in compliance
with the NIH guidelines (NRC 1985)
.
Experienced, lactating female CD1 mice were caged individually with a litter of ten 5-d-old, nursing pups (Charles River, Hollister, CA) under standard conditions. Two days later, the cages were brought to the laboratory between 0930 and 1030 h. The 7-d-old mice were chosen in random order, weighed and injected subcutaneously (s.c.) with graded amounts of aqueous MSG or an equivalent volume (3050 µL) of water alone (n = 93). The MSG dosages administered (mg MSG/g body wt) were as follows: 0.1 (n = 48), 0.2 (n = 31), 0.3 (n = 93), 0.4 (n = 49), 0.5 (n = 83) and 2.0 (n = 18). Mice were encoded with their treatment and reunited with their mothers in the home cages to continue nursing.
Glutamate administration.
To determine the optimal MSG treatment period, neuronal damage in the
ARC was assessed hourly after s.c. injection of 0.0, 0.2. 0.5 or 2.0 mg
MSG/g body wt. Reproducible microscopic evidence of ARC cell loss was
first observed 5 h after injection, a time course consistent with
published reports (Takasaki 1978
, Takasaki et al. 1979
). Accordingly, mothers were removed from their litters
5 h after treatment and given an overdose of sodium pentobarbital
by intraperitoneal injection. Pups were selected in random order and
their treatment and gender recorded before rapid decapitation with
scissors. Intact brains were removed from the cranial cavity within
~30 s and fixed by immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde plus 0.2%
glutaraldehyde in 0.1 mol/L sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Frontal
(coronal) tissue sections through the ARC-ME region were cut at a
thickness of 70 µm on an oscillating tissue slicer
(OTS 300003, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Philadelphia, PA) and
stored in fixative at 4°C before routine microscopy or
immunocytochemistry.
Plasma glutamate measurements.
Using the same protocol, pups chosen at random were decapitated at 15
min postinjection of 0.0, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.5 mg MSG/g body wt. Trunk
blood (50100 µL) was collected individually in
1.5-mL EDTA-coated microcentrifuge tubes and each plasma fraction
frozen and stored at -80°C. Plasma glutamate concentrations were
determined using a Beckman Model 6300 Amino Acid analyzer
(Beckman Coulter Bioresearch, Fullerton, CA) equipped for fluorometric
detection of o-phthalaldehydederivatized amino acids
as previously described (Hu et al. 1998
). The glutamate
concentration (nmol/mL) in each sample and the mean and SEM
for each dose were calculated; the differences were tested using
one-factor ANOVA by the Fisher protected least significant
difference test and the Scheffé F-test (Hu et al. 1998
), with P < 0.01 considered
significant.
Glutamate penetration: co-injection of vital dyes.
Studies were performed in 7-d-old CD1 mice (n = 40) to assess the effective penetration of MSG into the brain. An aqueous solution of 0.94 µmol/L bis-benzimide (Hoechst 33258, Cat. #H-1398, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and 0.73 µmol/L propidium iodide (Cat. # P-1304, Molecular Probes) was used as the MSG vehicle to ensure exact correlation between the amount of dye and MSG (169.12 Da) delivered. Bis-benzimide (533.9 Da, excitation 352 nm; emission 461 nm), a live-cell nuclear-permeant, blue-fluorescent stain, avidly labels the nucleus of every cell contacted. Propidium iodide (688.4 Da, excitation 535 nm; emission 617 nm), a live-cell nuclear-impermeant, red-fluorescent marker, stains only nuclei in dead cells. Mice were decapitated at 15 or 30 min after s.c. injection of the dye vehicle containing 0.0 (control), 0.2, 0.5 and 2.0 mg MSG/g body wt. Brains were fixed by immersion in buffered aldehyde solution, embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 6-µm thickness through the mid-ARC-ME region in the frontal plane; two to three sections were mounted sequentially on microscope slides.
Experiments in additional infant mice (n = 40) employed treatment with the same MSG dosages (0.0, 0.2, 0.5 and 2.0 mg/g body wt) in an aqueous solution of 1.0 g/L methylene blue (Polysciences, Warrington, PA), a supravital stain for axons and terminals which fluoresces red, and 0.75 mmol/L propidium iodide to label nuclei in dead cells. Because an advancing dye front was not evident, it appeared necessary to use a more concentrated dye solution. Subcutaneous injections of 30 µl Paragon Multiple Stain for Frozen Sections (Cat. #PS1301, Paragon C. & C., New York, NY) failed to gain access to the brain (n = 30) even after 60 min. Because MSG must first enter the vascular compartment to reach the ARC-ME, we performed direct intracardiac injections of 100 µL of undiluted Paragon Multiple Stain alone or together with 0.2, 0.3 or 0.5 mg MSG/g body wt (n = 15). Although mice expired within 2 min postinjection, probably due to cardiac tamponade, brains were immediately removed and immersed in fixative, embedded in paraffin, sectioned at a thickness of 6 µm and mounted as before. Ethanol extraction of Paragon Multiple Stain was avoided by examining paraffin-embedded ARC-ME sections by fluorescence microscopy without the standard deparaffinization.
Immunocytochemical staining.
Vibratome sections were rinsed (3 x 10 min) in Tris-HCl
buffer plus 0.9% NaCl (TBS), pH 7.4, before and after sequential
pretreatments (30 min each) in TBS solutions containing 50 mmol/L
glycine, 50% ethanol, 0.1% saponin plus 0.5% hydrogen peroxide, and
3% normal serum or 1% fish gelatin (G-7765, Sigma Chemical, St.
Louis, MO). Sections were incubated in primary antibodies against
important ARC-ME phenotypic markers for 4872 h at 4°C on an
orbital shaker. The specificity of the mouse antiglutamate antibody
(1:500 Glu-2, #22523, Incstar, Stillwater, MN) has been described
previously (Goldsmith et al. 1994
, Goldsmith and Thind 1995
). To identify NMDA receptors, we used a mouse
anti-NMDAR1 immunoglobulin G (IgG) (1:250 #54.1, PharMingen, San Diego,
CA); to identify AMPA receptors, we employed a mouse anti-GluR2/4 IgG
(1:250 #3A11, PharMingen). The specificity of both antibodies has been
described previously (Hu et al. 1998
). In addition, to
label intermediate filaments in (astrocytic) tanycytes, we used a goat
anti-glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) antibody (1:50 #C-19,
sc-6170, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), whose specificity
was established by the supplier.
After the samples were rinsed well in TBS, immunofluorescent staining
for glutamate was completed using 1:100 goat anti-mouse IgG coupled
to CY-2 (excitation peak 490 nm; emission peak 505 nm; Biological
Detection Systems, Pittsburgh, PA). Immunostaining for GluR and GFAP
was continued with the avidin-biotin-peroxidase method (IgG Elite Kits,
Vector, Burlingame, CA) or the peroxidase-antiperoxidase technique
as previously described (Goldsmith and Thind 1995
).
Biotinyl tyramide signal amplification (TSA-Indirect Signal
Amplification Kit, NEW Life Science Products, Boston, MA) was
used if required. Antigenic sites were revealed by incubation in 0.05%
3,3'-diaminobenzidine-4HCl (DAB) and 0.01% hydrogen peroxide, without
or with 0.03% NiSO4 (nickel DAB) as the chromogen.
Immunostained tissue sections were routinely dehydrated and mounted
permanently on glass slides.
Microscopy and analysis.
Hematoxylin and eosin staining and DAB immunocytochemistry were evaluated at low and high magnifications using a Leica DMRB photomicroscope (Leica, Deerfield, IL). Histochemical and immunofluorescence staining were analyzed using epifluorescence and appropriate filter sets for bis-benzimide (blue: wide band UV excitation 340380 nm; barrier filter 430 nm), for propidium iodide and Paragon Multiple Stain for Frozen Sections (red: narrow band green excitation 530560 nm, FITC excluded; barrier filter 580 nm) and for CY-2 (green: narrow band blue excitation 450490 nm; barrier filter 515 nm). Color images were captured using a DEI-470 CCD camera (Optronics, Goleta, CA) and the Scion Image 1.62a version of NIH Image, and brought to grayscale in Adobe Photoshop 4.0 to compose and label figures.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The s.c. injection of water or 0.1 mg MSG/g body wt produced no
evidence of ARC-ME injury, whereas light microscopic examination of
tissue sections taken 5 h after treatment with 0.2 mg MSG/g dose
showed initial injury in small bilateral groups of cells close to the
lateral recesses of the third ventricle. Signs of cytological damage
included reduced cytoplasmic volume, swollen subcellular organelles,
pyknotic nuclei and, in some cases, fragmented and condensed nuclear
material (Hu et al. 1998
). These injured cells were
presumably neurons because they were immunonegative for the astrocytic
marker GFAP (data not shown). Doses of 0.30.5 mg MSG/g body wt
produced dose-related increases in the number of damaged neurons
within an area expanding outward from the initial site. Even after the
0.5 mg dose, however, injured neurons remained confined to the
ventromedial ARC nucleus (Fig. 1A
).
|
Because plasma glutamate concentrations had returned to near normal by
5 h post-treatment (data not shown), they were measured at 15
min after s.c. injection when they are reportedly near maximal
(Stegink et al. 1979
). Water-injected controls
(n = 10) had a baseline glutamate level of 0.122
± 0.10 mmol/L, and single doses of 0.2 (n = 8),
0.3 (n = 10) and 0.5 (n = 10) mg MSG/g
body wt raised plasma glutamate concentrations to 2.10 ± 0.236,
4.57 ± 0.492 and 6.29 ± 0.257 mmol/L, respectively. Mean
15-min elevations were significantly different from baseline and from
each other (P < 0.01), and constituted increases of
16-, 36- and 51-fold, respectively, above the basal level. A single
injection of 0.2 mg MSG/g body wt, which produced a rapid 16-fold
increase in the plasma glutamate level to 2.10 mmol/L was the lowest
dose tested to initiate injury of specific medial basal hypothalamic
neurons in these 7-d-old mice.
| Immunocytochemical staining |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Glutamate penetration: co-injection of vital dyes |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our results elucidate earlier work showing MSG-induced ARC lesions
in infant mice (Holzwarth-McBride et al. 1976
,
Takasaki 1978
, Takasaki et al. 1979
) by
correlating MSG doses with peak plasma glutamate levels and the extent
of neuronal damage achieved. ARC neuronal damage in mice does not occur
if the plasma glutamate level remains <0.5 mmol/L (Stegink et al. 1974
). Administration of 0.2 mg MSG/g body wt here produced
a 15-min plasma glutamate concentration of 2.10 mmol/L, an increase of
> 16-fold above baseline (0.122 mmol/L). Injury with this dose is
consistent with previous work showing that ARC neuronal damage in mice
appears when the plasma level exceeds baseline by ~20-fold
(Bizzi et al. 1977
).
Interestingly, an eightfold rise in the plasma glutamate concentration
to 2.37 mmol/L, a value similar to that observed after our lowest
effective MSG dose, was observed previously not to affect hypothalamic
glutamate levels (McCall et al. 1979
). Even a 12-fold
increase in plasma glutamate was reported to cause only a slight
elevation in the glutamate content of the ARC nucleus (~0.12
µmol/mg protein) (Airoldi et al. 1979
).
Because the blood-brain barrier glutamate carrier is nearly
saturated under normal circumstances, it may not allow transport of
additional glutamate into the brain (McCall et al. 1979
). Moreover, because glutamate flux out of the brain is at
least seven times that into the brain, even large doses of MSG may fail
to produce measurable increases in hypothalamic glutamate
concentrations (McCall et al. 1979
).
A careful analysis across the MSG dose range studied suggested to us that the intensity of glutamate-induced NMDAR1 immunostaining was related to the degree of neuronal injury. Although basal receptor expression in controls was barely detectable, effective doses of 0.20.5 mg MSG/g body wt increased NMDAR1 staining intensity in a dose-dependent fashion. Enhanced expression was first seen consistently at the site of initial ARC neuronal injury, and advanced outward into the ventromedial ARC nucleus with escalating amounts of MSG. Weak immunostaining, which coexisted with the initial signs of neuronal damage, became progressively intense in neurons at the same location with higher doses of MSG. This increase in NMDAR1 expression apparently was specific because similar dose-related increases in immunostaining intensity were not observed for other substances present in unaffected ARC neurons (e.g., tyrosine hydroxylase) or with incubation in DAB substrate alone.
An increase in neuronal NMDAR1 expression levels has previously been
related to ordinary developmental changes, as seen with certain GluR
subunits (Seeburg 1993
) and postsynaptic metabotropic
GluR (McDonald et al. 1993
, Smirnova et al. 1993
). A correlation between NMDAR1 immunostaining and neuronal
injury was also reported in an earlier study in which pretreatment with
the NMDA receptor-selective antagonist MK-801 blocked
glutamate-induced ARC neurotoxicity more effectively than did the
AMPA receptor-selective antagonist NBQX (Lehmann and Jonsson 1992
). Immunostaining evidence of enhanced NMDAR1 subunit
expression therefore may serve not only to identify affected neurons,
but the intensity of staining may also reflect their state of
neurodegeneration.
Our results showed that the highly membrane-permeant "live
cell" dye bis-benzimide gained access to the entire brain by 15
min postinjection in 7-d-old mice. Comparable staining of all brain
nuclei at this time of peak plasma glutamate concentrations suggested
that bis-benzimide entry into the brain was neither dependent upon
nor affected by the amount of coadministered MSG. Consequently, these
data provided no substantive evidence about the concomitant entry of
glutamate. Several reports have suggested that the sodium introduced by
much higher dosages of MSG might elevate plasma osmolarity and
compromise function of the anatomical blood-brain barrier present
in mice from birth (McCall et al. 1979
, Pardridge 1979
). Increased glutamate concentrations in minute brain areas
might promote neuronal injury in the cerebral cortex, cerebellum and
amygdala without affecting overall brain glutamate concentrations
(McCall et al. 1979
). However, no such glutamate
penetration and damage occurred as a result of the low dose range of
MSG used here.
According to our hypothesis, ventral ARC damage occurs if the ventral
ARC-ME tanycytes are exposed to effective glutamate (MSG)
concentrations for a sufficient length of time. Our results using
Paragon Multiple Stain suggested that tanycytes may begin to sequester
blood-borne substances very soon after (0.5 min) intracardiac
injection, perhaps on their first pass through the
hypophysial-portal circulation. Furthermore, immunostaining
evidence (see Fig. 4B
) indicated that elevated glutamate
concentrations persist in the tanycytic compartment for 5 h after
MSG administration, long after peak plasma levels and any ARC increases
have abated (Heywood and Worden 1979
).
One theory of neurotoxicity is based on the assumption that lesions
occur only within the ARC nucleus and other regions thought to be
unprotected by an anatomic blood-brain barrier (McCall et al. 1979
). In the ARC-ME region, the lateral limits of the
barrier are represented by the cytoplasmic processes of tanycytes,
shown arching ventrolaterally through the middle of the ARC nucleus by
our methylene blue staining (Eurenius and Jarskar 1971
,
Pardridge 1979
, Weindl and Joynt 1972
).
Therefore, only ventromedial ARC neuronal perikarya and their axon
terminals in the ME are vulnerable to elevated concentrations of
circulating glutamate because they lie outside the blood-brain
barrier. Because a functional blood-brain barrier is already
present in newborn mice (McCall et al. 1979
), other
developmental conditions must render ventromedial ARC neurons in infant
mice highly susceptible to MSG-induced excitotoxicity, whereas the
same neurons in mature adults are relatively refractory.
The tanycytic framework of the ARC-ME region is well established in
neonatal mice and rats. However, elongating axons of ARC and other
neurons invade and terminate in the rodent ME throughout the first 34
wk of postnatal life (Eurenius and Jarskar 1971
). This
period, which corresponds to both reproductive maturation and
heightened glutamate responsiveness (Holzwarth-McBride et al. 1976
, Takasaki 1978
), is likely to include a
transient episode of inordinately high tanycyte-to-neurite ratios that
confer maximal glutamate sensitivity between postnatal d 5 and 10
(Eurenius and Jarskar 1971
). Elevated GFAP expression in
tanycytes may also contribute to ARC neuronal vulnerability before
adulthood. Phenotypically mature tanycytes in neonatal mice display
GFAP-containing intermediate filaments known to participate in
intracellular uptake and transport processes (de Vitry et al. 1981
). Tanycytic GFAP expression reaches a peak between d 5 and
10 of postnatal life, the period of greatest glutamate sensitivity
(de Vitry et al. 1981
). Ventromedial ARC neurons and
axon terminals may therefore experience unusually high glutamate levels
in infant mice due to peak GFAP expression in local tanycytes.
Our studies showed a conspicuous correspondence between the
"confluence of tanycytic processes" at the initial site of neuronal
injury and the restriction of neuronal damage to the portion of the
ventromedial ARC nucleus traversed by tanycytes. Although tanycytic
glia are resistant to injury themselves (Levi and Patrizio 1992
), their excessive number and intimate neuroglial
association may jeopardize neighboring ventromedial ARC neurons during
early postnatal life. Anatomic disruption of the blood-brain
barrier by hyperosmotic plasma need not occur; functional disruption,
especially of the efflux mechanism, for example, by reversal of
tanycytic glutamate transporters (Attwell et al. 1993
,
Kanai and Hediger 1992
, Levi and Raiteri 1993
, Pardridge 1979
), could be sufficient to
increase extraneuronal glutamate concentrations in discrete brain areas
(McCall et al. 1979
) and exacerbate injurious
conditions.
In summary, our results show that minimally harmful and higher plasma glutamate levels cause dose-related increases in the number of damaged neurons in the medial basal hypothalamus of infant mice. Ventromedial ARC neurons of 7-d-old mice appear particularly sensitive to elevated concentrations of circulating glutamate for the following reasons: 1) they lie outside the blood-brain barrier; 2) the area is traversed by tanycytes; 3) the tanycytes express high levels of GFAP; and 4) there may be particularly high tanyctye-to-neuron/terminal ratios at this time. Enhanced NMDAR1 receptor expression also coincides with the initial injury of selected neurons and accompanies progressive neurodegeneration. Because glutamate is sequestered by tanycytes and remains elevated for up to 5 h after administration, our results support the hypothesis that glutamate-induced neuronal injury is precipitated by unique neurotanycytic interrelationships in the ventromedial ARC nucleus in early postnatal mice.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Supported by International Glutamate Technical Committee #6246-01106. ![]()
3 AMPA,
-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid; ARC, arcuate nucleus; DAB, 3,3'-diaminobenzidine-4HCl; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; GluR, glutamate receptor; IgG, immunoglobulin G; ME, median eminence; MSG, monosodium glutamate; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate; s.c., subcutaneous; TBS, Tris buffered saline. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Airoldi L., Bizzi A., Salamona M., Garattini S. Attempts to establish the safety margin for neurotoxicity of monosodium glutamate. Filer L. J., Jr Garattini S. Kare M. R. Reynolds A. W. Wurtman R. J. eds. Glutamic Acid: Advances in Biochemistry and Physiology 1979:321-331 Raven Press New York, NY.
2. Ankacrona M., Dypbukt J. M., Bonfoco E., Zhivotovsky B., Orrenius S., Lipton S. A., Nicotera P. Glutamate-induced neuronal death: a succession of necrosis or apoptosis depending on mitochondrial function. Neuron 1995;15:961-973[Medline]
3. Attwell D., Barbour B., Szatkowski M. Nonvesicular release of neurotransmitter. Neuron 1993;11:401-407[Medline]
4. Bizzi A., Veneroni E., Salmona M., Garattini S. Kinetics of monosodium glutamate in relation to its neurotoxicity. Toxicol. Lett. 1977;1:123-130
5.
Bonfoco E., Krainc D., Ankacrona M., Nicotera P., Lipton S. A. Apoptosis and necrosis: two distinct events induced respectively by mild and intense insults with N-methyl-D-aspartate or nitric ovide/superoxide in cortical cell cultures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1995;92:7162-7166
6. Brorson J. R., Manzolillo P. A., Miller R. J. Ca2+ entry via AMPA/KA receptors and excitotoxicity in cultured cerebellar Purkinje cells. J. Neurosci. 1994;14:187-197[Abstract]
7. Choi D. W., Rothman S. M. The role of glutamate neurotoxicity in hypoxic-ischemic neuronal death. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 1990;13:171-182[Medline]
8. de Vitry F., Picart R., Jacque C., Tixier-Vidal A. Glial fibrillary acidic protein. A cellular marker of tanycytes in the mouse hypothalamus. Dev. Neurosci. 1981;4:457-460[Medline]
9. Eurenius L., Jarskar R. Electron microscope studies on the development of the external zone of the mouse median eminence. Z. Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat. 1971;122:488-502[Medline]
10. Goldsmith P. C., Thind K. K. Morphological basis for neuronal control of GnRH secretion in the monkey. Plant T. M. Lee P. A. eds. The Neurobiology of Puberty 1995;vol. 2:1-14 J. Endocrinology Ltd Bristol, UK.
11. Goldsmith P. C., Thind K. K., Perera A. D., Plant T. M. Glutamate-immunoreactive neurons and their GnRH neuronal interactions in the monkey hypothalamus. Endocrinology 1994;134:858-868[Abstract]
12. Heywood R., Worden A. N. Glutamate toxicity in laboratory animals. Filer L. J., Jr Garattini S. Kare M. R. Reynolds A. W. Wurtman R. J. eds. Glutamic Acid: Advances in Biochemistry and Physiology 1979:203-215 Raven Press New York, NY.
13. Holzwarth-McBride M. A., Hurst E. M., Knigge K. M. Monosodium glutamate induced lesions of the arcuate nucleus. I. Endocrine deficiency and ultrastructure of the median eminence. Anat. Rec. 1976;186:185-205[Medline]
14. Hu L., Fernstrom J. D., Goldsmith P. C. Exogenous glutamate enhances glutamate receptor subunit expression during selective neuronal injury in the ventral arcuate nucleus of postnatal mice. Neuroendocrinology 1998;68:77-88[Medline]
15. Kanai Y., Hediger M. A. Primary structure and functional characterization of a high-affinity glutamate transporter. Nature (Lond.) 1992;360:467-471[Medline]
16. Lehmann A., Jonsson T. MK-801 selectively protects mouse arcuate neurons in vivo against glutamate toxicity. NeuroReport 1992;3:421-424[Medline]
17. Levi G., Patrizio M. Astrocyte heterogeneity: endogenous amino acid levels and release evoked by non-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor agonists and by potassium-induced swelling in type-1 and type-2 astrocytes. J. Neurochem. 1992;58:1943-1952[Medline]
18. Levi G., Raiteri M. Carrier-mediated release of neurotransmitters. Trends Neurosci 1993;16:415-419[Medline]
19. McCall A., Glaeser B. S., Millington W., Wurtman R. J. Monosodium glutamate neurotoxicity, hyperosmolarity, and blood-brain barrier dysfunction. Neurobehav. Toxicol. 1979;1:279-283[Medline]
20. McDonald J. W., Fix A. S., Tizzano J. P., Schoepp D. D. Seizures and brain injury in neonatal rats induced by 1S,3R-ACPD, a metabotropic glutamate receptor agonist. J. Neurosci. 1993;13:4445-4455[Abstract]
21. National Research Council Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Publication no. 8523 (rev.) 1985 National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD.
22. Ohara Y., Iwata S., Ichimure M., Sasaoka M. Effect of administration routes of monosodium glutamate on plasma glutamate levels in infant, weanling and adult mice. J. Toxicol. Sci. 1977;2:281-290
23. Olney J. W. Excitotoxic amino acids: research applications and safety implications. Filer L. J., Jr Garattini S. Kare M. R. Reynolds A. W. Wurtman R. J. eds. Glutamic Acid: Advances in Biochemistry and Physiology 1979:287-331 Raven Press New York, NY.
24. Pardridge W. M. Regulation of amino acid availability to brain: selective control mechanisms for glutamate. Filer L. J., Jr Garattini S. Kare M. R. Reynolds A. W. Wurtman R. J. eds. Glutamic Acid: Advances in Biochemistry and Physiology 1979:125-137 Raven Press New York, NY.
25. Pelligrini-Giampetro D. E., Gorter J. A., Bennett M.V.L., Zukin R. S. The GluR2 (GluR-B) hypothesis: Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors in neurological disorders. Trends Neurosci 1997;20:464-470[Medline]
26. Reynolds W. A., Butler V., Lemkey-Johnston N. Hypothalamic morphology following ingestion of aspartame or MSG in the neonatal rodent and primate: a preliminary report. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 1976;2:471-480[Medline]
27. Seeburg P. H. The TINS/TiPS Lecture. The molecular biology of mammalian glutamate receptor channels. Trends Neurosci. 1993;16:359-365[Medline]
28.
Smirnova T., Laroche S., Errington M. L., Hicks A. A., Bliss T. V., Mallet J. Transsynaptic expression of a presynaptic glutamate receptor during hippocampal long-term potentiation. Science (Washington DC) 1993;262:433-436
29. Stegink L. D., Reynolds A. W., Filer L. J., Jr, Baker G. L., Daabees T. T., Pitkin R. M. Comparative metabolism of glutamate in the mouse, monkey, and man. Filer L. J., Jr Garattini S. Kare M. R. Reynolds A. W. Wurtman R. J. eds. Glutamic Acid: Advances in Biochemistry and Physiology 1979:85-102 Raven Press New York, NY.
30. Stegink L. D., Shepherd J. A., Brummel M. C., Murray L. M. Toxicity of protein hydrolysate solutions: correlation of glutamate dose and neuronal necrosis to plasma amino acid levels in young mice. Toxicology 1974;2:285-299[Medline]
31. Takasaki Y. Studies on brain lesion by administration of monosodium L-glutamate to mice. I. Brain lesions in infant mice caused by administration of monosodium L-glutamate. Toxicology 1978;9:293-305[Medline]
32. Takasaki Y., Matsuzawa Y., Iwata S., Ohara Y., Yonetani S., Ichimura M. Toxological studies of monosodium L-glutamate in rodents: relationships between routes of administration and neurotoxicity,. Filer L. J., Jr Garattini S. Kare M. R. Reynolds A. W. Wurtman R. J. eds. Glutamic Acid: Advances in Biochemistry and Physiology 1979:255-285 Raven Press New York, NY.
33. Weindl A., Joynt R. J. The circumventricular organs. Brain-Endocrine Interaction. Median Eminence: Structure and Function 1972;vol. I:280-297 Karger Basel, Switzerland. International. Symposium, Munich, 1971
34.
Wickelgren I. Teaching the brain to take drugs. Science (Washington DC) 1998;280:2045-2047
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E O Farombi and O O Onyema Monosodium glutamate-induced oxidative damage and genotoxicity in the rat: modulatory role of vitamin C, vitamin E and quercetin Human and Experimental Toxicology, May 1, 2006; 25(5): 251 - 259. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||