![]() |
|
|
Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720-3104
Dear Dr. Suttie,
We have appreciated the opportunity of seeing Stumpf and Bidmons letter.
We are sorry not to have known of their papers when preparing ours
(Carpenter and Zhao 1999
). Their work gives reason to
expect that molecules with vitamin D activity will be present on the
skin and fur of rats that have an adequate supply of the vitamin
(Stumpf 1995
).
Where, in Steenbocks work, an irradiated rat conferred protection
from rickets on a nonirradiated cage mate (Steenbock and Black 1924
), the presence of active molecules on the coat of the
former could certainly have been the source of the latters
protection. Also when one cage of irradiated rats was placed on top of
a control cage (Nelson and Steenbock 1925a
), it could
again have been particles of skin and fur falling down and being eaten
by the animals below that protected them, although the potency of these
fragments would have had to be surprisingly high.
However, in further experiments by Steenbocks group, the wire screens
on the floors of cages previously occupied by nonirradiated rats were a
source of vitamin D activity when they were irradiated in the absence
of rats (Nelson and Steenbock 1925b
). It appeared,
therefore, that whatever had come onto the screens from the rats was
only a precursor that needed to be irradiated before it displayed
vitamin D activity. The two possible sources of such precursor(s)
appear to be grease from the fur, or from fecal pellets.
We join Drs. Stumpf and Bidmon in hoping that workers with the necessary facilities and experience will soon put the hypotheses to a direct test, and explain what has remained a mystery for so long.
REFERENCES
1.
Carpenter K. J., Zhao L. Forgotten mysteries in the early history of vitamin D. J. Nutr. 1999;129:923-927
2.
Nelson E. M., Steenbock H. Further observations on the anti-rachitic action of the irradiated animals on the nonirradiated when placed in the same cage. Am. J. Physiol. 1925a;73:341-345
3.
Nelson E. M., Steenbock H. Observations bearing on the alleged induction of growth-promoting properties in air by irradiation with ultraviolet light. J. Biol. Chem. 1925b;62:575-593
4.
Steenbock H., Black A. The induction of growth-promoting and calcifying properties in a ration by exposure to ultraviolet light. J. Biol. Chem. 1924;61:405-422
5. Stumpf W. E. Vitamin D sites and mechanisms of action: a histochemical perspective. Reflections on the utility of autoradiography and cytopharmacology for drug targeting. Histochem. Cell Biol. 1995;104:417-427[Medline]
6.
Stumpf W. E., Bidmon H.-J. "Vitamin D mysteries"? Secretions and sloughings from skin and oral-gastrointestinal mucosa contain hormone. J. Nutr. 2000;130:264
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||