![]() |
|
|
Department of Food Science and Technology, Division of Human Nutrition, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
1To whom correspondence should be addressed.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: lycopene tomato lymphocytes DNA damage humans
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Epidemiologic studies suggest that antioxidant capacity is improved by
the consumption of tomato products, thereby decreasing the risk of the
development of diseases related to oxidative stress (Burney et al. 1989
, Franceschi et al. 1994
,
Giovannucci et al. 1995
, Parfitt et al. 1994
). Tomatoes contain different compounds (e.g., carotenoids,
vitamin C, flavonoids ) that may be responsible for the antioxidant
properties suggested. In particular, lycopene, the main carotenoid in
tomato products possesses the greatest quenching ability of singlet
oxygen among the various carotenoids (Di Mascio et al. 1989
) and is effective in protecting blood lymphocytes from
NO2 radical damage (Bohm et al. 1995
).
The few data available show that lycopene, like the other carotenoids, is not equally distributed in tissues; this suggests a mechanism whereby certain carotenoids may exert unique biologic effects. However, further data about lycopene concentrations and antioxidant properties in specific cells are required.
In a previous study, we found that the daily consumption of 60 g
tomato puree for 3 wk increased lycopene and ß-carotene plasma
concentrations and enhanced the resistance of lymphocyte DNA to an
oxidative stress (Riso et al. 1999
). In this study, to
obtain data more consistent with the actual dietary intake, we
evaluated whether the consumption of 25 g tomato puree for 2 wk
was sufficient to produce the same effect. Furthermore, we were
interested in studying the resistance of lymphocyte DNA to an oxidative
stress in relation to lymphocyte lycopene concentration.
| SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Healthy female subjects (n = 11) were selected on
the basis of their eating habits determined by means of a
food-frequency questionnaire and a food preference list
(Porrini et al. 1995
). We wanted to exclude subjects who
did not eat fruits and vegetables and those who followed a specific
diet or regimen (e.g., vegetarians, vegans, macrobiotics).
Subjects selected were not taking any supplement, drug or medication. They were all lean (body mass index = 20.3 ± 1.5 kg/m2) nonsmokers, with a mean age of 25.4 ± 2.2 y. Informed written consent was obtained from each participant and the protocol was approved by the Local Ethics committee.
Experimental design.
A week before the beginning of the study (-7 d) and during the entire
experimental period (14 d), subjects were asked to follow precise
instructions regarding their diet to limit carotenoid intake (<600
µg/d) without interfering with their own eating
habits. They were provided with a list of foods that were and were not
permitted as previously reported in detail (Riso et al. 1999
) and were asked to avoid any source of lycopene other than
the tomato puree they were given during the supplementation period.
After the first week of consuming a diet low in carotenoids, subjects received 25 g of double-concentrate tomato puree (Sainsburys, London, UK) providing ~7 mg lycopene and 0.3 mg ß-carotene. The tomato puree was consumed uncooked at lunch with pasta and 5 g of olive oil for 14 consecutive days. Subjects consumed their meals at home. Compliance with the diet was assessed by a dietician.
Blood samples.
Blood samples were collected at the beginning (d 0) and the end (d 14) of the experiment, early in the morning after overnight fasting. The blood was divided into two aliquots; 10 mL were used to separate lymphocytes, and the rest was centrifuged at 1000 x g at 4°C to obtain the plasma.
| Extraction of carotenoids from tomato, cells and plasma |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tomato samples were extracted exhaustively with tetrahydrofuran,
minimizing isomerization and degradation by performing the operation in
the dark and using BHT as antioxidant. The extract was then recovered
in petroleum ether, and aliquots of the organic phase were evaporated
under nitrogen in the dark and redissolved in the HPLC mobile phase
(Riso and Porrini 1997
).
Lymphocytes.
Lymphocytes were recovered from 10 mL of whole blood by means of a density gradient separation with Hystopaque 1077 (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO). After being washed, lymphocytes were recovered in 1 mL of PBS and counted by hemocytometer. Cell membrane lysis was performed by adding 1 mL TRITON 1% (Sigma Chemical) and quickly freezing (in liquid nitrogen) and defrosting the samples. Carotenoid extraction was performed by adding 1 mL ethanol (containing echinenone as internal standard) and 2 mL hexane. After 1 min of vortexing, the organic layer was separated. A subsequent extraction with 2 mL hexane was performed, and the organic layer was separated and added to the previous one. The sample was then dried under N2 and solubilized in 100 µL of the HPLC mobile phase for the carotenoid analysis.
Plasma.
The extraction was performed in duplicate on 100 µL of
plasma as previously reported (Porrini et al. 1998
).
HPLC analysis of carotenoids.
Carotenoid HPLC analysis was performed as previously described
(Riso and Porrini 1997
). Carotenoid concentrations were
calculated by means of a mixture of standards containing lutein,
zeaxanthin, ß-cryptoxanthin (Hoffman-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland),
-carotene and ß-carotene (Sigma Chemical); lycopene (Sigma
Chemical) was prepared daily to avoid problems of degradation and
injected separately. Lycopene concentration is the sum of the
all-trans and cis isomers (Porrini et al. 1998
). Carotenoid concentrations were corrected by the
recovery of an internal standard. Detection limits, determined at a
signal-to-noise ratio of 3, were between 20 and 70
µg/L.
| DNA damage evaluated by Comet assay |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lymphocyte separation.
Lymphocyte separation was performed on 70 µL of whole blood by density gradient with Hystopaque 1077 (Sigma) and then resuspended in PBS. Two samples for each subject were prepared.
Comet assay or single cell gel electrophoresis and H2O2 treatment.
The Comet assay was conducted according to Singh et al. (1988)
with little modification. It was used to evaluate DNA
damage to primary lymphocytes after exposure to an oxidant. Cells
embedded in agarose on microscope slides were exposed to a solution of
H2O2 in PBS (500 µmol/L) for 5
min; other unexposed slides served as controls.
Quantification of DNA damage.
Cells for each slide (n = 50) were captured electronically with an image analysis system and analyzed for fluorescence intensity. Undamaged DNA is recognized as a fluorescent core. The presence of strand breaks in the chain (damaged DNA) allows DNA to migrate during the electrophoresis to form a tail; the larger and more fluorescent the tail, the greater is the DNA damage.
DNA damage was calculated as Relative Tail Moment (RTM) as follows: Tail Moment/(Head Moment + Tail Moment). Tail/Head Moment is the sum of the intensity of each pixel in the Tail/Head multiplied by its distance from the center. CV <8% were calculated on both control and treated slides. For each subject, the mean RTM of treated cells was subtracted from the mean RTM of control cells.
Statistical analysis.
Only complete sets of data were analyzed; thus nine of the eleven subjects were considered. One-way ANOVA for a repeated-measures design was used to investigate the effect of daily tomato consumption on lycopene and other carotenoid plasma concentrations. One-way ANOVA was also used to evaluate the effect of tomato consumption on lymphocyte DNA damage. Differences were considered significant if P < 0.05. The analysis of simple regression was used to evaluate the correlation between variables (plasma and lymphocyte carotenoid concentration vs. RTM). Statistical analyses were performed on a personal computer with Statistica Software (Statsoft, Tulsa, OK). Values are means ± SD.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Plasma carotenoid concentrations at recruitment (-7 d) were 0.35
± 0.08 µmol/L for lycopene, 0.49 ± 0.06
µmol/L for lutein, 0.07 ± 0.02 µmol/L
for zeaxanthin, 0.40 ± 0.09 µmol/L for
ß-cryptoxanthin, 0.08 ± 0.04 µmol/L for
-carotene, 0.40 ± 0.11 µmol/L for
all-trans ß-carotene and 0.05 ± 0.03
µmol/L for cis ß-carotene. After 7 d of
consuming a tomato-free diet (d 0) there were significant
reductions in lycopene, lutein and ß-cryptoxanthin (P
< 0.05).
The plasma total lycopene, all-trans ß-carotene and
cis ß-carotene concentrations increased significantly
after 2 wk of consuming the diet with tomato puree (Table 1
, P < 0.05). The plasma concentrations of lutein,
zeaxanthin, ß-cryptoxanthin and
-carotene were not significantly
different before and after tomato consumption.
|
There was no effect of tomato consumption on lutein, zeaxanthin,
ß-cryptoxanthin,
-carotene, all-trans ß-carotene or
cis ß-carotene concentration of lymphocytes (Table 1)
.
Tomato intake for 14 d significantly increased lycopene
concentration (P < 0.005).
DNA damage.
DNA damage of lymphocytes, quantified as RTM, significantly decreased with respect to baseline, after the 14 d of tomato intake (P < 0.0001). After tomato consumption, DNA damage to lymphocytes (RTM = 0.28 ± 0.08) was half (P < 0.0001) that of the basal level (RTM = 0.57 ± 0.05). The RTM of control cells at d 0 and 14 were 0.06 ± 0.02 and 0.07 ± 0.03, respectively.
The regression analysis showed an inverse correlation between plasma lycopene concentration and oxidative DNA damage (r = -0.82, P < 0.0001) and between lymphocyte lycopene concentration and oxidative DNA damage (r = -0.62; P < 0.01).
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Some studies (Gartner et al. 1997
, Porrini et al. 1998
, Stahl and Sies 1992
) have described the
carotenoid plasma response after tomato product intake; however, little
is known about the relationship between the intake of foods rich in
carotenoids and their concentrations in specific cells or the amount
necessary to ensure the antioxidant activity.
Some authors reported data obtained after supplementation of subjects
with pure substances such as ß-carotene. Murata et al. (1994)
found that ß-carotene concentrations in plasma,
peripheral blood monocytes and platelets from subjects supplemented
with 60 mg ß-carotene for 44 wk were higher than in subjects given a
placebo; however, no differences were present in red blood cells.
We found that the daily consumption of 25 g tomato puree for 14
consecutive days significantly increased plasma and lymphocyte lycopene
concentration, whereas ß-carotene concentration increased only in
plasma, and the other carotenoids remained constant. The amount of
lycopene delivered as tomato was quite low and the period of intake
short, but the bioavailability of lycopene from tomato puree is
probably very high (Porrini et al. 1998
), resulting in a
significant increase not only in plasma but also in cells. Previously,
we reported an increase in plasma lycopene concentration of ~0.5
µmol/L after the consumption of 60 g of the same
tomato puree daily for 3 wk (Riso et al. 1999
). In this
study, the increase was ~0.4 µmol/L after the
consumption of less than half that quantity of tomato puree for 2 wk.
Consequently, it seems that low amounts are sufficient to improve and
maintain plasma levels, and that plasma lycopene concentrations do not
respond in a dose-dependent manner. The 25 g tomato puree were
sufficient to improve lycopene concentration even in lymphocytes, where
we found almost a doubling effect.
To our knowledge, this is the first time that the cellular
concentrations of specific antioxidants were studied relative to DNA
oxidative damage. The interest in lymphocytes is due not only to the
fact that they are considered a good marker of the actual body state,
but also because lymphocytes could be a reliable model for studying the
effect of the addition of specific antioxidants to the diet
(Anderson et al. 1994
, Duthie et al. 1996
, Riso et al. 1999
). We studied DNA damage
because it is a useful biomarker of the oxidative status and the
antioxidant defense system of the animal (Duthie et al. 1996
). DNA damage in primary lymphocytes was induced ex vivo by
means of H2O2 and measured
by Comet assay. We chose a high concentration of
H2O2 (500
µmol/L) to exacerbate DNA damage and highlight cells able
to protect themselves from the oxidative stress.
After subjects consumed tomato puree for 14 d, DNA damage of lymphocytes challenged with H2O2 was reduced by ~50%, demonstrating an improvement in cell antioxidant capacity. The regression analysis showed a strong inverse relation between plasma lycopene concentration and lymphocyte DNA damage. This indicates that when dietary antioxidant intake is consistent, plasma antioxidant concentrations reflect well the cellular antioxidant capacity, even if plasma is more directly subjected to the fluctuation of dietary antioxidant intake than are cells.
The inverse relation between lycopene concentration and DNA damage was confirmed also in lymphocytes. From these data, we conclude that lycopene contributes to the protection of DNA from oxidative stress or, at least, that it is a good marker of tomato antioxidant properties. In fact, other substances present in tomato (ß-carotene, lutein, phytoene and vitamin C) contribute to the antioxidant properties observed.
Few other studies have investigated the effect of the consumption of a
real food on DNA damage. Pool-Zobel et al. (1997)
supplemented 23 subjects for 2 wk with 300 mL tomato juice (40 mg
lycopene), 330 mL carrot juice (22.3 mg ß-carotene, 15.7 mg
-carotene) or 10 g dried spinach powder (11.3 mg lutein). Using
the Comet assay, they found a significant decrease in endogenous levels
of strand breaks in lymphocyte DNA after the intake of all the three
foods, and a reduction of the levels of oxidized pyrimidine bases
(detected by introducing an intermediate incubation step with
endonuclease III) during the carrot juice supplementation.
Rao and Argawal (1998)
evaluated the effect of dietary
supplementation of lycopene from different tomato products (two
different spaghetti sauces and a tomato juice) on lymphocyte DNA
oxidation, measured by 8-oxo-2-deoxyguanosine. DNA damage tended to
be lower when the products were consumed. Presumably, the
supplementation period was too short for differences to be significant
although the amount of lycopene provided was quite high. The authors
found a significant increase in plasma lycopene concentrations but did
not evaluate lymphocyte concentrations.
To our knowledge, this is the first report describing the effect of the
consumption of a small quantity of tomato, and consequently lycopene
[7 mg vs. 20.550.4 mg lycopene used by Rao and Argawal (1998)
and 40 mg lycopene used by Pool-Zobel et al. (1997)
], for a short period of time on oxidative damage.
Previously, large amounts of foods and/or antioxidants likely have been
used to clearly establish their effects on specific targets. Now it is
important to begin considering the effect of reasonable amounts of
dietary antioxidants to determine healthy dietary habits to recommend
to the population.
This is particularly important in light of the results of a cell
culture study (Lowe et al. 1999
) in which high lycopene
concentrations (>3 µmol/L) did not afford protection
against DNA damage in HT29 cells but seemed to act as a prooxidant.
However, these high lycopene concentrations cannot be achieved even by
consuming a diet very rich in lycopene, probably due to a mechanism of
control that maintains plasma lycopene concentrations at values less
than ~1 µmol/L (Porrini et al. 1998
).
In conclusion, our results emphasize the importance of the consumption of foods such as tomato in improving antioxidant capacity and decreasing the risk of the development of diseases related to oxidative stress.
Manuscript received July 23, 1999. Revision accepted October 15, 1999.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Anderson D., Yu T. W., Phillips B. J., Schmezer P. The effect of various antioxidants and other modifying agents on oxygen-radical-generated DNA damage in human lymphocytes in the Comet assay. Mutat. Res. 1994;307:261-271[Medline]
2. Bohm F., Tinkler J. H., Truscott T. G. Carotenoids protect against cell membrane damage by nitrogen dioxide radical. Nat. Med. 1995;1:98-99[Medline]
3.
Burney P.G.J., Comstock G. W., Morris J. S. Serologic precursors of cancer: serum micronutrients and the subsequent risk of pancreatic cancer. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1989;49:895-900
4. Di Mascio P., Kaiser S., Sies H. Lycopene as the most efficient biological carotenoid singlet oxygen quencher. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1989;274:532-538[Medline]
5.
Duthie S. J., Ma A., Ross M. A., Collins A. R. Antioxidant supplementation decreases oxidative DNA damage in human lymphocytes. Cancer Res 1996;56:1291-1295
6. Franceschi S., Bidoli E., La Vecchia C., Talamini R., DAvanzo B., Negri E. Tomatoes and risk of digestive-tract cancers. Int. J. Cancer 1994;59:181-184[Medline]
7.
Gartner C., Stahl W., Sies H. Lycopene is more bioavailable from tomato paste than from fresh tomatoes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997;66:116-122
8.
Giovannucci E., Ascherio A., Rimm E. B., Stampfer M. J., Colditz G. A., Willett W. C. Intake of carotenoids and retinol in relation to risk of prostate cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1995;87:1767-1776
9. Lowe G. M., Booth L. A., Young A. J., Bilton R. F. Lycopene and ß-carotene protect against oxidative damage in HT29 cells at low concentrations but rapidly lose this capacity at higher doses. Free Radic. Res. 1999;30:141-151[Medline]
10.
Murata T., Tamai H., Morinobu T., Manago M., Takenaka H., Hayashi K, Mino M. Effect of long-term administration of ß-carotene on lymphocyte subsets in humans. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994;60:597-602
11.
Parfitt V. J., Rubba P., Bolton C., Marotta G., Hartog M., Mancini M. A comparison of antioxidant status and free radical peroxidation of plasma lipoproteins in healthy young persons from Naples and Bristol. Eur. Heart J. 1994;15:871-876
12.
Pool-Zobel B. L., Bub A., Muller H., Wollowski I., Rechkemmer G. Consumption of vegetables reduces genetic damage in humans: first results of a human intervention trial with carotenoid-rich foods. Carcinogenesis 1997;18:1847-1850
13. Porrini M., Crovetti R., Silva S., Testolin G. Evaluation of satiety sensations and food intake after different preloads. Appetite 1995;25:17-30[Medline]
14. Porrini M., Riso P., Testolin G. Absorption of lycopene from single or daily portions of raw and processed tomato. Br. J. Nutr. 1998;80:353-361[Medline]
15. Rao A.V., Argawal S. Bioavailability and in vivo antioxidant properties of lycopene from tomato products and their possible role in the prevention of cancer. Nutr. Cancer 1998;3:199-203
16.
Riso P., Pinder A., Santangelo A., Porrini M. Does tomato consumption effectively increase the resistance of lymphocyte DNA to oxidative damage?. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999;69:712-718
17. Riso P., Porrini M. Determination of carotenoids in vegetable foods and plasma. Int. J. Vitam. Nutr. Res. 1997;67:47-54[Medline]
18. Singh N. P., McCoy M. T., Tice R. R., Schneider E. L. A simple technique for quantitation of low levels of DNA damage in individual cells. Exp. Cell Res. 1988;175:184-191[Medline]
19. Stahl W., Sies H. Uptake of lycopene and its geometrical isomers is greater from heat-processed than from unprocessed tomato juice. J. Nutr. 1992;122:2161-2166
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Y. Lorenzo, A. Azqueta, L. Luna, F. Bonilla, G. Dominguez, and A. R. Collins The carotenoid {beta}-cryptoxanthin stimulates the repair of DNA oxidation damage in addition to acting as an antioxidant in human cells Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2009; 30(2): 308 - 314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. R. Wasson, V. J. McKelvey-Martin, and C. S. Downes The use of the comet assay in the study of human nutrition and cancer Mutagenesis, May 1, 2008; 23(3): 153 - 162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Devaraj, S. Mathur, A. Basu, H. H. Aung, V. T. Vasu, S. Meyers, and I. Jialal A Dose-Response Study on the Effects of Purified Lycopene Supplementation on Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2008; 27(2): 267 - 273. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sahin, C. Orhan, M. Tuzcu, K. Sahin, and O. Kucuk The Effects of Tomato Powder Supplementation on Performance and Lipid Peroxidation in Quail Poult. Sci., February 1, 2008; 87(2): 276 - 283. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Zhao, G. Aldini, E. J Johnson, H. Rasmussen, K. Kraemer, H. Woolf, N. Musaeus, N. I Krinsky, R. M Russell, and K.-J. Yeum Modification of lymphocyte DNA damage by carotenoid supplementation in postmenopausal women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2006; 83(1): 163 - 169. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Porrini and P. Riso What Are Typical Lycopene Intakes? J. Nutr., August 1, 2005; 135(8): 2042S - 2045S. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. R Collins Assays for oxidative stress and antioxidant status: applications to research into the biological effectiveness of polyphenols Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 261S - 267S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Briviba, S. E. Kulling, J. Moseneder, B. Watzl, G. Rechkemmer, and A. Bub Effects of supplementing a low-carotenoid diet with a tomato extract for 2 weeks on endogenous levels of DNA single strand breaks and immune functions in healthy non-smokers and smokers Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2004; 25(12): 2373 - 2378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. K. Campbell, K. Canene-Adams, B. L. Lindshield, T. W.-M. Boileau, S. K. Clinton, and J. W. Erdman Jr Tomato Phytochemicals and Prostate Cancer Risk J. Nutr., December 1, 2004; 134(12): 3486S - 3492S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Tyssandier, C. Feillet-Coudray, C. Caris-Veyrat, J.-C. Guilland, C. Coudray, S. Bureau, M. Reich, M.-J. Amiot-Carlin, C. Bouteloup-Demange, Y. Boirie, et al. Effect of Tomato Product Consumption on the Plasma Status of Antioxidant Microconstituents and on the Plasma Total Antioxidant Capacity in Healthy Subjects J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2004; 23(2): 148 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Moller, U. Vogel, A. Pedersen, L. O. Dragsted, B. Sandstrom, and S. Loft No Effect of 600 Grams Fruit and Vegetables Per Day on Oxidative DNA Damage and Repair in Healthy Nonsmokers Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2003; 12(10): 1016 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Nair, H. Bartsch, and J. Nair Prevention of degenerative diseases; clues from studies investigating oxidative stress, Brussels, 13 November 2002 Mutagenesis, September 1, 2003; 18(5): 477 - 483. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Nyberg, S.-M. Hou, G. Pershagen, and B. Lambert Dietary fruit and vegetables protect against somatic mutation in vivo, but low or high intake of carotenoids does not Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2003; 24(4): 689 - 696. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Bowen, L. Chen, M. Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis, C. Duncan, R. Sharifi, L. Ghosh, H.-S. Kim, K. Christov-Tzelkov, and R. van Breemen Tomato Sauce Supplementation and Prostate Cancer: Lycopene Accumulation and Modulation of Biomarkers of Carcinogenesis Experimental Biology and Medicine, November 1, 2002; 227(10): 886 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Heber and Q.-Y. Lu Overview of Mechanisms of Action of Lycopene Experimental Biology and Medicine, November 1, 2002; 227(10): 920 - 923. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Giovannelli, C. Saieva, G. Masala, G. Testa, S. Salvini, V. Pitozzi, E. Riboli, P. Dolara, and D. Palli Nutritional and lifestyle determinants of DNA oxidative damage: a study in a Mediterranean population Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2002; 23(9): 1483 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Moller and S. Loft Oxidative DNA damage in human white blood cells in dietary antioxidant intervention studies Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2002; 76(2): 303 - 310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E.-S. Hwang and P. E. Bowen Can the Consumption of Tomatoes or Lycopene Reduce Cancer Risk? Integr Cancer Ther, June 1, 2002; 1(2): 121 - 132. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Chen, M. Stacewicz-Sapuntzakis, C. Duncan, R. Sharifi, L. Ghosh, R. v. Breemen, D. Ashton, and P. E. Bowen Oxidative DNA Damage in Prostate Cancer Patients Consuming Tomato Sauce-Based Entrees as a Whole-Food Intervention J Natl Cancer Inst, December 19, 2001; 93(24): 1872 - 1879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. van den Berg, T. van Vliet, W. M. R. Broekmans, N. H. P. Cnubben, W. H. J. Vaes, L. Roza, G. R.M.M. Haenen, A. Bast, and H. van den Berg A Vegetable/Fruit Concentrate with High Antioxidant Capacity Has No Effect on Biomarkers of Antioxidant Status in Male Smokers J. Nutr., June 1, 2001; 131(6): 1714 - 1722. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||