![]() |
|
|
Signaling in Human Tumor Cells1
Department of Radiation Oncology and * Department of Otolaryngology, Long Island Jewish Medical Center, New Hyde Park, NY 11040
2To whom correspondence should be addressed.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
.
Using a reporter gene driven by the estrogen receptor, I3C (10125
µmol/L) significantly repressed the 17ß-estradiol
(E2)-activated ER-
signaling in a dose-dependent manner. I3C and
breast cancer susceptibility gene 1
(BRCA1) synergistically inhibited transcriptional activity of ER-
.
Moreover, I3C down-regulated the expression of the
estrogen-responsive genes, pS2 and cathepsin-D, and
up-regulated BRCA1. The inhibitory effects of I3C did not
contribute to its cytotoxic effects because these activities were
observed at less than toxic concentrations. These results further
suggest that antitumor activities of I3C are associated not only with
its regulation of estrogen activity and metabolism, but also its
modulation of ER transcription activity.
KEY WORDS: indole-3-carbinol estrogen receptor human breast cancer breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1)
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
I3C is not considered the active component responsible for the
biological effects. A series of oligomeric products that are formed
from I3C, such as 2-(indol-3-ylmethyl)-3,3'-diindolylmethane, are the
active compounds (Broadbent and Broadbent 1998a
and 1998b
, Chang et al. 1999
). Oligomeric products
arise rapidly in acidic environments such as in the stomach and form
more slowly during neutral conditions.
Estrogen is clearly responsible for the regulation of many genes
involved in the regulation of proliferation and chemosensitivity in
estrogen-sensitive tissues. Estrogen deprivation causes regression
of many breast tumors (McKeon 1997
). 17ß-estradiol
(E2) binds to the estrogen receptor (ER) with high affinity. In turn,
the ER (ER-
and ER-ß) bind estrogen response elements (ERE)
located in promoters of estrogen-responsive genes and regulate
their transcription (Evans 1988
, Katzenellenbogen 1996
). The action of the ER is regulated not only by ligand,
but also by some coregulatory proteins (Torchia et al. 1998
). Recently, we found that the breast
cancer susceptibility gene 1 (BRCA1) interacts physically
with ER-
and inhibits the expression of an ER-
transcription
cofactor, p300 (Fan et al. 1998
and our unpublished
data). As a result of these effects, the hormone-activated
transcription activity of the ER-
is suppressed by BRCA1 (Fan et al. 1999
). In addition, we found that I3C up-regulates
BRCA1 expression in a dose-dependent manner (Meng et al. 2000a
) in breast cancer cells and in cervical
cancer cells (unpublished). Therefore, these findings compelled us to
question whether I3C directly modulates the transcription activity of
ER-
and whether I3C gives rise to any effects on BRCA1 functions as
an inhibitor of ER-
signaling.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The cell lines used in this study were obtained from the American Type
Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and maintained as monolayer
cultures in Dulbeccos modified Eagles medium (DMEM)
supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), 2 mmol/L glutamine, 0.1
mg/L streptomycin and 1000 U/L penicillin G (BioWhittaker,
Walkersville, MD). All of the vectors used in this study were described
previously (Fan et al. 1999
), including the ER
expression plasmid containing both the T7 and cytomegalovirus
promoters, the ERE-TK-LUC reporter composed of the vitellogenin A2 ERE
controlling a minimal thymidine kinase promoter (TK81), and luciferase
in plasmid pGL2, the expression of wild-type BRCA1 in pcDNA3
plasmid, pCMV-Sp1 (Sp1) and Sp1-TK-LUC. I3C was purchased from Sigma
(St. Louis, MO), dissolved in 95% ethanol and stored at -20°C
before use. The MTT assay of I3C toxicity showed that IC3 (>150
µmol/L, 24 h treatment) resulted in a significant
toxicity in these cell lines (data not shown). Therefore, 10125
µmol/L doses of I3C were employed in the present
study.
Determination of the 17ß-estradiolactivated ER-
mediated
transcriptional activity.
Assay of E2-activated ER-
mediated transcriptional activity was
performed as described previously (Fan et al. 1999
).
Subconfluent proliferating cells plated in 24-well culture dishes were
cotransfected with the luciferase reporter plasmid containing ERE (ERE-
TK-LUC; 0.5 µg), ER expression plasmid (0.5
µg/L) and pCMV-ß-gal (0.5 µg/L).
pBluescript DNA (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) was used to adjust the total
DNA concentration to an equal amount per well. The transfection was
carried out using the transfection reagent, lipofectin (Gibco-BRL,
Gaithersburg, MD) according to the manufactures instructions. Cells
were cultured for an additional 24 h in DMEM (phenol red free, and
charcoal-stripped FCS and 1 µmol/L E2) with
different concentration of l3C. Cells were harvested with a luciferase
lysis buffer (Promaga, Madison, WI). Lysates were analyzed for
luciferase activity using a liquid scintillation counter (Model
LS60001C, Beckman, Fullerton, CA) and the data were normalized by
protein concentration.
Protein analysis.
pS2, cathepsin-D and BRCA1 proteins ware assayed using a
Western blot assay as described previously (Fan et al. 1998
). Conditioned media from the cultures of I3C-untreated and
-treated cells were collected and concentrated using a Centriprep-3
device (Amicon, Beverly, MA). Conditioned medium (50
µL) was electrophoresed on a 15%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to membranes via
electroblotting. In addition, cells were harvested by lysing PBS
containing 1% Nonidet P-40 and protease inhibitors, 10 ng/L leupeptin,
10 ng/L aprotinin, 2 mmol/L 4-(2- aminoethyl)-benzene-sulfonyl
fluoride, 10 mmol/L sodium fluoride, 1 mmol/l sodium
-orthovanadate
and 5 mmol/L sodium pyrophosphate. Equal aliquots of total protein (50
µg per lane) were electrophoresed on a 6%
SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred to membranes by
electroblotting. The membranes were incubated with primary antibodies,
pS2 (V3030, monoclonal, Biomedia, CA), cathepsin-D
(06467, polyclonal, Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY) and BRCA1
(C-20, polyclonal; Santa Cruz, Hercules, CA), and then incubated with
secondary antibodies after being washed extensively. Antibody reaction
was revealed using an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system
(Amersham Life Science, Arlington Heights, IL) as instructed by the
manufacturer. Equal protein loading and transfer were confirmed by
immunoblotting for
-actin protein using a goat polyclonal
-actin
antibody (I-19; Santa Cruz). A colored marker (Bio-Rad Laboratories,
Hercules, CA) was used as a molecular size standard.
Statistical analysis.
The statistical analyses were carried out by the Statistica (Stat-Soft,
Tulsa, OK) software system. The differences in luciferase
activity were assessed by Students t test.
P < 0.05 was considered to be significant and 0.05
P < 0.1 was considered to be marginally
significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
is
repressed by I3C.
First, we examined the effect of I3C on estrogen-activated
transcriptional activity of the ER-
in MCF-7, an ER-positive
human breast cancer cell line. The cells were cotransfected overnight
with an ERE-containing luciferase reporter (ERE-TK-LUC) plasmid and
an ER expression plasmid. The ER-
expression plasmid controlled by
the CMV promoter was provided to ensure a high level expression of
ER-
under all assay conditions. As shown in Figure 1A
, I3C inhibited the E2-stimulated reporter activity. There was a
dose-dependent decrease up to an
50% reduction compared with
the positive control level (without I3C treatment). Similar results
were also observed in the human breast cancer cell lines T47D and
MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 1B
) and three human cervical cancer cell
lines, CaSki, SiHa and C33-A (Fig. 1C
). We also tested the
capability of I3C to regulate the activity of a reporter gene driven by
the Sp1 transcription factor (Fig. 1D
). I3C had neither an
inhibitory nor an enhancing effect on the ability of Sp1 to regulate
this reporter gene.
|
transcription signaling (Fan et al. 1999
transcriptional signaling.
Using two breast cancer cell lines (Fig. 2A
|
Finally, we determined that I3C could affect the amount of BRCA1 and
pS2 and cathepsin-D. Both the conditioned medium and extracts from
the cells of exponentially growing MCF-7 cells cultured in
serum-free medium containing E2 (1 µmol/L) and/or I3C
(100 µmol/L) were used for Western analysis. As shown in
Figure 3A
and
B, E2 significantly increased the expression of pS2 and cathepsin-D
proteins
3.54 and 5.56.0 fold in 10% FSC medium and
serum-free medium, respectively. However, I3C significantly
suppressed this estrogen-enhanced protein expression. In contrast
to pS2 and cathepsin-D, I3C significantly increased BRCA1 protein
expression in the presence and the absence of E2. 17ß-estradiol
slightly decreased BRCA1 protein. Similar results were also obtained in
T47D cells (data not shown).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
in a dose-dependent manner.
This suppression was associated with an inhibition of the accumulation
of pS2 and cathepsin-D, proteins whose gene expression is estrogen
dependent. We also found that I3C and wild-type BRCA1
synergistically suppressed the ER-
transcription signaling.
Additionally, I3C was able to up-regulate BRCA1, and this
up-regulation was independent of estrogen. These results clearly
show that I3C is a negative regulator of ER-
signaling. I3C does not
show any effects on the activity of Sp1 transcription factor,
indicating that I3C selectively represses the E2-stimulated
transcriptional activity and is not an indiscriminate repressor of
transcription. The cytotoxic effects of I3C did not contribute to the
inhibition of ER-
transcription activities because the doses used
did not give rise to any inhibition of cell proliferation (Meng et al. 2000a
This direct link between ER signaling modulation and I3C has
important implications in the understanding of antitumor activity
of I3C because many tumors are enhanced by estrogen. It is known that
estrogen, via its specific binding to ER, stimulates the expression of
many genes containing ERE in their regulatory regions. Many such genes
are involved in promotion or enhancement of cell proliferation, DNA and
protein synthesis and metastatic capability of breast cancer [for
reviews, see Dickson and Lippman (1987)
and
Osborne (1998)
]. Our work and other previous studies
showed that I3C exhibited the chemoprevention properties of breast
cancer through its antitumor cell proliferation, antitumor cell
migration and invasion activities (Bradlow et al. 1991
and 1995
, Chen et al. 1999
, Cover et al. 1999
, Ge et al. 1999
, Hudson et al. 1998
, Liu et al. 1994
, Meng et al. 2000a and
2000b, Niwa et al. 1994
, Telang et al. 1992
and 1997
, Tiwari et al. 1994
,
Wong et al. 1997
). Thus, the negative regulatory role of
I3C in the transcriptional activity of the ER-
identified in this
study provides a plausible mechanism for some of the
antiproliferation and metastasis potential of I3C in breast cancer.
This notion is supported by other in vitro and in vivo observations,
suggesting an inverse correlation between the concentration of I3C and
ER expression in cancer cells (Liu et al. 1994
,
Yuan et al. 1999
). In fact, it has been found that
2-(indol-3-ylmethyl)-3,3'-diindolylmethane, a major active component of
I3C in vivo, inhibits the proliferation of breast cancer cells
associated with blocking ER function (Chang et al. 1999
).
Increased expression of the tumor suppressor gene BRCA1 may
also play an important role for I3C in the suppression of ER-
transcriptional signaling. Mutations in BRCA1 increase the risk of
breast and ovarian cancer (Ford et al. 1994
, Miki et al. 1994
) and prostate cancer in men (Langston et al. 1996
). BRCA1 exhibits multiple biological functions as a tumor
suppressor (Fan et al. 1998
). Loss of heterozygosity has
been found frequently in a region of chromosome 17p at which BRCA1
locates in cervical carcinoma cases (Krul et al. 1999
).
Studies in our laboratory are determining whether papillomavirus
oncoproteins (cofactors for cervical cancer) bind and target BRCA1 for
degradation. Recent studies from our laboratory showed that BRCA1
functions as a new inhibitor in the modulation of ER-
transcriptional signaling through its physical binding to the ER-
and its regulation of an ER-
cofactor p300/CBP (Fan et al. 1999
and unpublished data). This and previous studies
(Meng et al. 2000a
) show that exposure to I3C results in
a significant increase in the expression of the BRCA1 protein. Because
this up-regulation is independent of estrogen, other mechanisms
must account for this. I3C increases expression of some Phase I and
Phase II genes via it binding to the Ah receptor [reviewed by
Chen et al. (1998)
]. The ability of I3C to increase
BRCA1 together with our observations that I3C and BRCA1 synergistically
down-regulate ER-dependent gene expression increases the
effectiveness of I3C in this activity. Other investigators have
determined that I3C promotes the 2-hydroxylation of E2 and decreases
the use of the 16
-hydroxlation pathway, metabolism that would
decrease estrogenic activity [reviewed by Bradlow et al. (1995)
]. Hence, I3C appears to reduce estrogen activity by
multiple mechanisms.
Our present findings highlight the potential of this
phytochemical for both the prevention and treatment of
estrogen-enhanced cancers. In fact, I3C was effective in preventing
estrogen-dependent cervical dysplasia in normal mice and
estrogen-dependent cervical cancer in mice with papillomavirus
transgenes (Jin et al. 1999
). More recently, I3C was
shown to be effective in the treatment of cervical dysplasia in women
(Bell et al. 2000
). Concentrations of I3C in these and
other in vivo studies indicate that I3C is effective at concentrations
achievable by eating cruciferous vegetables. The higher concentration
of I3C used in the cervical dysplasia study was 400 mg/d, a
concentration usually obtainable by daily consumption of one third of a
head of cabbage. Because the conversion of I3C to the active
condensation products is not as efficient in vitro as in the acid
environment of the stomach, higher concentrations of this compound are
usually required to evaluate its in vivo activities. In addition to the
powerful effect of antiestrogenic activities, IC3 has other antitumor
activities including induction of enzymes that would detoxify
carcinogens [reviewed by Chen et al. (1998)
],
induction of apoptosis (Ge et al. 1999
and our
unpublished observations in cervical cells), down-regulation of
CDK6 (Cover et al. 1998
) and as an antioxidant
(Shertzer et al. 1988
). Together, these beneficial
effects indicate that this phytochemical has tremendous potential in
the treatment and prevention of cancer, particularly
estrogen-enhanced cancer.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
3 Abbreviations used: BRCA1, breast cancer
susceptibility gene 1; E2, 17ß-estradiol; ER, estrogen
receptor; ERE, estrogen response element; ERE-TK-LUC, an ERE, thymidine
kinase promoter and luciferase in plasmid pGL2; FCS, fetal calf serum;
I3C, indole-3-carbinol. ![]()
Manuscript received April 25, 2000. Initial review completed June 27, 2000. Revision accepted August 24, 2000.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Bell, M. C., Crowley-Nowick, P., Bradlow, H. L., Sepkovic, D.W., Schmidt-Grimminger, D., Howell, P., Mayeaux, E. J., Tucker, A., Turbat-Herrera, E. A. & Mathis, J. M. (2000) Placebo controlled trial of indole-3-carbinol in the treatment of CIN. (in press).
2.
Bradlow H. L., Michnovicz J., Telang N. T., Osborne M. P. Effects of dietary indole-3-carbinol on estradiol metabolism and spontaneous mammary tumors in mice. Carcinogenesis 1991;12:1571-1574
3. Bradlow H. L., Sepkovic D. W., Telang N. T., Osborne M. P. Indole-3-carbinol: A novel approach to breast cancer prevention. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1995;768:180-200[Abstract]
4. Broadbent T. A., Broadbent H. S. 11. The chemistry and pharmacology of indole-3-carbinol (indole-3-methanol) and 3-(methoxymethyl)indole. [Part II]. Curr. Med. Chem. 1998a;5:337-352[Medline]
5. Broadbent T. A., Broadbent H. S. 1. The chemistry and pharmacology of indole-3-carbinol (indole-3-methanol) and 3-(methoxymethyl)indole. [Part II]. Curr. Med. Chem. 1998b;5:469-491[Medline]
6. Chang Y. C., Riby J., Chang G. H., Peng B. C., Firestone G., Bjeldanes L. F. Cytostatic and antiestrogenic effects of 2-(indol-3-ylmethyl)-3,3'-diindolylmethane, a major in vivo product of dietary indole-3-carbinol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1999;58:825-834[Medline]
7.
Chen I., McDougal A., Wang F., Safe S. Aryl hydrocarbon-mediated antiestrogenic and antitumorigenic activity of diindolymethane. Carcinogenesis 1998;19:1631-1639
8.
Cover C. M., Hsieh S. J., Cram E. J., Hong C., Riby J. E., Bjeldanes L. F., Firestone G. L. Indole-3-carbinol and tamoxifen cooperate to arrest the cell cycle of MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res 1999;59:1244-1251
9.
Cover C. M., Hsieh S. J., Tran S. H., Hallden G., Kim G. S., Bjeldanes L. F., Firestone G. L. Indole-3-carbinol inhibits the expression of cyclin-dependent kinase-6 and induces a G 1 cell cycle arrest of human breast cancer cells independent of estrogen receptor signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:3838-3847
10. Dickson R. B., Lippman M. E. Estrogenic regulation of growth and polypeptide growth factor secretion in human breast carcinoma. Endocr. Rev. 1987;8:29-43[Medline]
11. Evans R. M. The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily 1988;240:889-895 Science Washington DC
12. Fan S., Wang I. A., Yuan R. Q., Ma Y. X., Meng Q., Erdos M. R., Brody L. C., Goldberg I. D., Rosen E. M. BRCA1 as a potential human prostate tumor suppressor: modulation of proliferation, damage responses and expression of cell regulatory proteins. Oncogene 1998;16:3069-3082[Medline]
13. Fan S., Wang J. A., Yuan R., Ma Y., Meng Q., Erdos M. R., Pestell R. G., Yuan F., Auborn K. I., Goldberg I. D., Rosen E. M. BRCA1 regulates estrogen receptor signaling in transfected cells 1999;284:1354-1356 Science Washington DC
14. Ford D., Easton D. F., Bishop D. T., Narod S. A., Goldgar D. E. Risks of cancer in BRCA1-mutation carriers. Lancet 1994;343:692-695[Medline]
15. Ge X., Fares F. A., Yannai S. Induction of apoptosis in MCF-7 cells by indol-3-carbinol is independent of p53 and bax. Anticancer Res 1999;19:3199-3203[Medline]
16. Hudson E. A., Howells L., Ball H. W., Pfeifer A. M., Manson M. M. Mechanisms of action of indole-3-carbinol as a chemopreventive agent. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 1998;26:S370[Medline]
17.
Jin L., Qi M., Chen D. Z., Anderson A., Yang G. Y., Arbeit I. M., Auborn K. I. Indole-3-carbinol prevents cervical cancer in human papilloma virus type 16 (HPV16) transgenic mice. Cancer Res 1999;59:3991-3997
18. Katzenellenbogen B. S. Estrogen receptors: bioactivities and interactions with cell signaling pathways. Biol. Reprod. 1996;54:287-293[Abstract]
19.
Kojima T., Tanaka T., Mori H. Chemoprevention of spontaneous endometrial cancer in female donryu rats by indole-3-carbinol. Cancer Res 1994;54:1446-1449
20. Kothari A., Borges A., Kothari L. Chemoprevention by melatonin and combined melatonin-tamoxifen therapy of second generation nitroso-methylurea-induced mammary tumours in rats. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 1995;4:497-500[Medline]
21. Krul E. J., Kersemaekers A. M., Zomerdijk-Nooyen Y. A., Cornelisse C. J., Peters L. A., Fleuren G. J. Different profiles of allelic losses in cervical carcinoma cases in Surinam and the Netherlands. Cancer 1999;86:997-1004[Medline]
22. Langston A. A., Stanford J. L., Wicklund K. G., Thompson J. D., Blasej R. G., Ostrander E. A. Germ-line BRCA1 mutations in selected men with prostate cancer. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1996;58:881-884[Medline]
23.
Liu H., Wormke M., Safe S. H., Bjeldanes L. F. Indolo[3,2-b]carbazole: a dietary-derived factor that exhibits both anti estrogenic and estrogenic activity. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1994;86:1758-1765
24. Loub W. D., Wattenberg L. W., Davis D. W. Aryl hydrocarbon hydroxylase induction in rat tissues by naturally occurring indoles of cruciferous plants. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1975;54:985-988
25. McKeon V. A. The Breast Cancer Prevention Trial: evaluating tamoxifens efficacy in preventing breast cancer. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 1997;26:79-90[Medline]
26. Meng Q., Qi M., Chen D. Z., Goldberg I., Rosen E., Auborn K., Fan S. Suppression of breast cancer invasion and migration by indole-3-carbinol: associated with up-regulation of BRCA1 and E-cadherin/catenin complexes. J. Mol. Med. 2000a;78:155-165[Medline]
27. Meng Q., Goldberg I., Rosen E., Fan S. Inhibitory effects of indole-3-carbinol on cell invasion and migration in human breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2000b;in press
28.
Michnovicz J. J., Bradlow H. L. Induction of estradiol metabolism by dietary indole-3-carbinol in humans. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990;82:947-949
29. Miki Y., Swensen J., Shattuck-Eidens D., Futreal P. A., Harshman K., Tavtigian S., et al A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 1994;266:66-71 Science Washington DC
30. Niwa T., Swaneck G., Bradlow H. L. Alterations in estradiol metabolism in MCF-7 cells induced by treatment with indole-3-carbinol and related compounds. Steroids 1994;59:523-527[Medline]
31. Osborne C. K. Steroid hormone receptors in breast cancer management. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 1998;51:227-238[Medline]
32. Shertzer H. G., Berger M. L., Tabor M. W. Intervention in free radical mediated hepatotoxicity and lipid peroxidation by indole-3-carbinol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1988;37:333-338[Medline]
33. Telang N. T., Bradlow H. L., Osborne M. P. Molecular and endocrine biomarkers in non-involved breast: relevance to cancer chemoprevention. J. Cell Biochem. 1992;160:161-169
34. Telang N. T., Katdare M., Bradlow H. L., Osborne M. P. Estradiol metabolism: an endocrine biomarker for modulation of human mammary carcinogenesis. Environ. Health Perspect. 1997;105(Suppl 3):559-564
35.
Tiwari R. K., Guo L., Bradlow H. L., Telang N. T., Osborne M. P. Selective responsiveness of human breast cancer cells to indole-3-carbinol, a chemopreventive agent. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1994;86:126-131
36. Torchia J., Glass C., Rosenfeld M. G. Co-activators and co-repressors in the integration of transcriptional responses. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1998;10:373-383[Medline]
37. Wong G. Y., Bradlow L., Sepkovic D., Mehl S., Mailman J., Osborne M. P. Dose-ranging study of indole-3-carbinol for breast cancer prevention. J. Cell Biochem. 1997;2829:111-116
38. Yuan F., Chen D. Z., Liu K., Sepkovic D. W., Bradlow H. L., Auborn K. Anti-estrogenic activities of indole-3-carbinol in cervical cells: implication for prevention of cervical cancer. Anticancer Res 1999;19:1673-1680[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S.-A. Lee, J. H Fowke, W. Lu, C. Ye, Y. Zheng, Q. Cai, K. Gu, Y.-T. Gao, X.-o. Shu, and W. Zheng Cruciferous vegetables, the GSTP1 Ile105Val genetic polymorphism, and breast cancer risk Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 753 - 760. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Tilton, S. A. Givan, C. B. Pereira, G. S. Bailey, and D. E. Williams Toxicogenomic Profiling of the Hepatic Tumor Promoters Indole-3-Carbinol, 17{beta}-Estradiol and {beta}-Naphthoflavone in Rainbow Trout Toxicol. Sci., March 1, 2006; 90(1): 61 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Savino III, J. F. Evans, D. Rabinowitz, K. J. Auborn, and T. H. Carter Multiple, disparate roles for calcium signaling in apoptosis of human prostate and cervical cancer cells exposed to diindolylmethane. Mol. Cancer Ther., March 1, 2006; 5(3): 556 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E M Rosen, S Fan, and C Isaacs BRCA1 in hormonal carcinogenesis: basic and clinical research Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2005; 12(3): 533 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Takada, M. Andreeff, and B. B. Aggarwal Indole-3-carbinol suppresses NF-{kappa}B and I{kappa}B{alpha} kinase activation, causing inhibition of expression of NF-{kappa}B-regulated antiapoptotic and metastatic gene products and enhancement of apoptosis in myeloid and leukemia cells Blood, July 15, 2005; 106(2): 641 - 649. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Garcia, G. A. Brar, D. H. H. Nguyen, L. F. Bjeldanes, and G. L. Firestone Indole-3-Carbinol (I3C) Inhibits Cyclin-dependent Kinase-2 Function in Human Breast Cancer Cells by Regulating the Size Distribution, Associated Cyclin E Forms, and Subcellular Localization of the CDK2 Protein Complex J. Biol. Chem., March 11, 2005; 280(10): 8756 - 8764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Yoshida, S. Katashima, J. Ando, T. Tanaka, F. Uematsu, D. Nakae, and A. Maekawa Dietary indole-3-carbinol promotes endometrial adenocarcinoma development in rats initiated with N-ethyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine, with induction of cytochrome P450s in the liver and consequent modulation of estrogen metabolism Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2004; 25(11): 2257 - 2264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Ambrosone, S. E. McCann, J. L. Freudenheim, J. R. Marshall, Y. Zhang, and P. G. Shields Breast Cancer Risk in Premenopausal Women Is Inversely Associated with Consumption of Broccoli, a Source of Isothiocyanates, but Is Not Modified by GST Genotype J. Nutr., May 1, 2004; 134(5): 1134 - 1138. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Auborn, M. Qi, X. J. Yan, S. Teichberg, D. Chen, M. P. Madaio, and N. Chiorazzi Lifespan Is Prolonged in Autoimmune-Prone (NZB/NZW) F1 Mice Fed a Diet Supplemented with Indole-3-Carbinol J. Nutr., November 1, 2003; 133(11): 3610 - 3613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. L. Kohut, J. R. Thompson, J. Campbell, G. A. Brown, M. D. Vukovich, D. A. Jackson, and D. S. King Ingestion of a Dietary Supplement Containing Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and Androstenedione Has Minimal Effect on Immune Function in Middle-Aged Men J. Am. Coll. Nutr., October 1, 2003; 22(5): 363 - 371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Li, J. Backer, A. S. K. Wong, E. L. Schwanke, B. G. Stewart, and M. Pasdar Bcl-2 expression decreases cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion J. Cell Sci., September 15, 2003; 116(18): 3687 - 3700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Fowke, F.-L. Chung, F. Jin, D. Qi, Q. Cai, C. Conaway, J.-R. Cheng, X.-O. Shu, Y.-T. Gao, and W. Zheng Urinary Isothiocyanate Levels, Brassica, and Human Breast Cancer Cancer Res., July 15, 2003; 63(14): 3980 - 3986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Auborn, S. Fan, E. M. Rosen, L. Goodwin, A. Chandraskaren, D. E. Williams, D. Chen, and T. H. Carter Indole-3-Carbinol Is a Negative Regulator of Estrogen J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2470S - 2475. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. H. Carter, K. Liu, W. Ralph Jr., D. Chen, M. Qi, S. Fan, F. Yuan, E. M. Rosen, and K. J. Auborn Diindolylmethane Alters Gene Expression in Human Keratinocytes In Vitro J. Nutr., November 1, 2002; 132(11): 3314 - 3324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Chinni and F. H. Sarkar Akt Inactivation Is a Key Event in Indole-3-carbinol-induced Apoptosis in PC-3 Cells Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2002; 8(4): 1228 - 1236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D.-Z. Chen, M. Qi, K. J. Auborn, and T. H. Carter Indole-3-Carbinol and Diindolylmethane Induce Apoptosis of Human Cervical Cancer Cells and in Murine HPV16-Transgenic Preneoplastic Cervical Epithelium J. Nutr., December 1, 2001; 131(12): 3294 - 3302. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||