![]() |
|
|

*
Laboratoire de Biochimie Cellulaire,
Laboratoire de Biochimie de la Nutrition and
**
Laboratoire de Biologie Cellulaire, Université Catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
2To whom correspondence should be addressed.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-isobutyric acid and L-hydroxyproline. By
contrast, transport in the BL-to-AP direction resulted to a large
extent from passive movement (paracellular passage and transcellular
diffusion). L-Pro accumulation by Caco-2 cells was
significantly greater from the AP pole than from the BL pole. About
3050% of the accumulated molecules were incorporated into newly
synthesized proteins in a process inhibited by cycloheximide, whereas
the remainder were extensively metabolized into nonamino acid
compounds. L-Pro accumulations from the AP and BL poles
were both Na+ dependent, but they exhibited different
characteristics. AP accumulation was inhibited by competition with
(methylamino)-
-isobutyric acid, L-hydroxyproline and, to
a lesser extent, D-Pro, whereas BL accumulation was
inhibited by competition with L-hydroxyproline,
(methylamino)-
-isobutyric acid,
-aminoisobutyric acid,
L-histidine and small neutral amino acids. The results
indicate that AP-to-BL transport and AP accumulation of
L-Pro exhibited very different characteristics than
BL-to-AP transport and BL accumulation.
KEY WORDS: Caco-2 cells L-proline intestinal transport transepithelial transport intracellular accumulation
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The intestinal transport of imino acids has been investigated in
various animal species with the use of different tissue preparations.
L-Proline (L-Pro) has been reported to be
transported across the brush border membrane of the rat and rabbit
small intestine through two Na+-dependent carrier
systems: the B system, which is selective for neutral amino acids, and
the IMINO system (Munck et al. 1994
,
Stevens et al. 1982
). Reports with rabbit jejunal brush
border membrane vesicles indicate that the IMINO carrier of
the rabbit small intestine is a relatively selective carrier for imino
acids: it is strongly inhibited by imino acids,
(methylamino)-
-isobutyric acid (MeAIB) and, to a lesser extent,
L-phenylalanine, but it is insensitive to glycine,
L-alanine, ß-alanine and most other amino acids
(Stevens et al. 1985
and 1987
). An equivalent
Na+-dependent transport system with a high
affinity for imino acids and a low affinity for neutral amino acids has
been described in intact epithelium from the distal ileum of the rabbit
(Munck 1985
). However, in the intact preparation, imino
acids were also transported by an Na+-dependent
system that accepts neutral, cationic and non
-amino acids and that
was not detected in brush border membrane vesicles. The imino acid
carrier of the guinea pig small intestine resembles the
IMINO carrier of the rabbit small intestine (Hayashi et al. 1980
, Satoh et al. 1989
). In contrast,
the imino acid carrier of the rat small intestine differs markedly from
those of guinea pig and rabbit small intestine (Munck et al. 1994
). It transports non
-amino acids such as ß-alanine
and
-aminobutyric acid as efficiently as imino acids; second, it
does not prefer the L over the D configuration,
is sensitive to the small neutral amino acid, glycine and to
-aminoisobutyric acid (AIB) and is insensitive to inhibition by
neutral amino acids with side chains that contain more than one methyl
group. Moreover, although in the rabbit and guinea pig small intestine
the transport of imino acids is both Cl- and
Na+ dependent, in the rat small intestine
transport is Cl- independent (Munck et al. 1994
). The study of Malo et al. (1991)
demonstrated the coexistence of both
Na+-dependent and
Na+-independent carrier systems for
L-Pro uptake into brush border membrane vesicles from human
fetal small intestine. The Na+-dependent uptake
was attributed to the IMINO system, but this was not
confirmed by inhibition studies.
Major qualitative differences are observed with respect to the
transport of L-Pro in the various animal species. This
interspecies variation in the intestinal transport of L-Pro
prevents the extrapolation of animal data to humans. In addition,
studies on human adult tissue are lacking because of difficulties in
obtaining material for experiments. The use of a human cell culture
system, as an in vitro model of the intestinal barrier, would therefore
be a useful approach to characterize the mechanisms and the factors
that regulate the transport of imino acids across the human intestinal
mucosa. One such system based on the culture of the Caco-2 cells on
microporous membranes is increasingly used to investigate the
physiology of the enterocytes as well as the mechanisms involved in the
transport of nutrients and pharmacological agents. This cell line,
although derived from a colon adenocarcinoma, has been shown to
express, under routine culture conditions, numerous morphological
features of the small intestine absorptive cells, including a brush
border at the apical (AP) surface, AP tight junctional complexes, a
tall columnar shape and a polarized distribution of membrane
components, including enzymes, receptors, transport systems and ion
channels (Hidalgo et al. 1989
). Caco-2 cells have been
reported to express several transport systems that are present in the
intestinal epithelium. These include transport systems for nutrients
such as glucose, amino acids and dipeptides as well as for vitamins
such as cobalamin and biotin, nucleosides, bile acids and
monocarboxylic acids (for a review, see Hidalgo and Li 1996
).
The uptake of L-Pro in Caco-2 cells was previously studied by Nicklin et al. (1992). They showed that L-Pro uptake was saturable, energy dependent and Na+ dependent. According to the results of competition experiments with amino acids and synthetic analogs, the authors concluded that the carrier system responsible for L-Pro uptake had many features in common with the ubiquitous system A. These results were, however, obtained with monolayers cultured on six-well plates and, most likely, formed of undifferentiated or only partially differentiated Caco-2 cells.
In the present study, the transport of L-Pro was investigated in monolayers of differentiated Caco-2 cells grown on microporous membrane supports. Two amino acid carrier systems that serve L-Pro have been identified and characterized: the Na+-dependent IMINO system at the AP membrane and the Na+-dependent A system at the BL membrane.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Iscoves modified Dulbeccos medium, Hams F12 medium, NCTC 135 medium, Hanks balanced salt solution (HBSS, powder form), HEPES, L-glutamine, a mixture of trace elements and minimal essential medium nonessential amino acids were purchased from GIBCO BRL (Life Technologies Ltd., Paisley, UK). L-Phe, L-Leu, L-Pro, D-Pro, L-hydroxyproline, L-His, glycine, L-Ala, ß-Ala, AIB, MeAIB, 2-deoxyglucose (2-DOG), choline chloride, deoxycholic acid sodium salt, cycloheximide, 5-(N,N-hexamethylene)-amiloride, albumin complexed to linoleic acid, ethanolamine, insulin, triiodothyronine, hydrocortisone and o-phthaldialdehyde were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Trichloroacetic acid (TCA), sodium azide, NaHCO3, NaOH, Tris, 5-sulfosalicylic acid and LiOH were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). 2-[N-Morpholino]ethanesulfonic acid was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Fetal bovine serum was purchased from BioWhittaker Europe (Verviers, Belgium). Epidermal growth factor was purchased from Boehringer-Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany). Bovine dermal type I collagen was purchased from Cellon (Strassen, Luxembourg). L-[2,3-3H]Proline (L-[3H]Pro, specific activity 1.63 TBq/mmol) and D-[1-14C]mannitol (D-[14C]mannitol, specific activity 2.15 GBq/mmol) were purchased from Amersham Life Sciences (Little Chalfont, U.K.).
Cell culture.
The intestinal Caco-2 cell line was routinely grown, as previously
described (Halleux and Schneider 1991
,
Sergent-Engelen et al. 1993
), in plastic tissue culture
flasks (175 cm2; Greiner Labortechnik, Frickenhaussen,
Germany) using the basal defined medium (Schneider 1989
). Basal defined medium mainly consists in a 5:5:1 (v/v/v)
mixture of Iscoves modified Dulbeccos, Hams F12 and NCTC 135
media.
For transport experiments, efflux experiments and biotransformation
studies, the cells were seeded onto a poly(ethylene terephthalate)
microporous membrane (1-µm pore diameter, 11-µm thickness, 1.6
x 106 pores/cm2; Whatman SA,
Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium) as previously described (Halleux and Schneider 1991
, Sergent-Engelen et al. 1993
).
All cells used in this study were between passages 194 and 239.
Experiments were always performed
24 h after the last feeding
because the time after feeding is known to affect the transport of
amino acids. The integrity of the monolayers was checked by measurement
of the transepithelial flux of
D-[14C]mannitol and the transepithelial
electrical resistance (TEER) (Millicell-ERS Resistance System;
Millipore, Bedford, MA and Endohm 24; World Precision Instruments,
Sarasota, FL). All of the monolayers used in this study exhibited TEER
values of 400600
· cm2 and
D-[14C]mannitol clearances of <30 µL ·
insert-1 · h-1.
Transport studies.
The culture medium was replaced by HBSS containing 5 mmol/L glucose and supplemented with 10 mmol/L HEPES and 5 mmol/L NaHCO3 (transport medium). The pH value of the transport medium was adjusted to pH 7.4 with NaOH or Tris for sodium-free medium. Before transport experiments, the cells were depleted of amino acids by incubation for 30 min at 37°C in the transport medium, after which the donor and acceptor solutions were replaced with the appropriate solutions prewarmed at 37°C.
Transepithelial passage was quantified by the addition of D-[14C]mannitol and L-[3H]Pro in either the upper or lower compartment of the bicameral culture insert and analysis of the solution of the other compartment. The upper and lower compartments contained 1.8 and 2.8 mL transport medium, respectively. The donor solution contained the radioactive compounds (8.416.7 MBq/L L-[3H]Pro and 16.7 MBq/L D-[14C]mannitol) dissolved in transport medium in the presence of a varying amount of nonlabeled L-Pro to give the required final concentration. At each sampling time (60, 120 and 180 min), 100 µL transport medium was withdrawn from the acceptor compartment and replaced with fresh transport medium. The rates of transport were calculated from the slope of L-Pro or D-mannitol appearance curves.
To determine sodium dependency of transport, sodium chloride in the transport medium was replaced with an equimolar amount of choline chloride and sodium salts were replaced with their potassium equivalents. Alternatively, amiloride (100 µmol/L) was added to the sodium-containing transport medium in both compartments to block the Na+/H+ exchanger. To ensure that choline did not induce muscarinic effects, atropine (10 µmol/L) was added to the Na+-free medium. For energy depletion, transport medium was depleted in glucose and supplemented with 1 mmol/L NaN3 and 50 mmol/L 2-DOG in both compartments. For protein synthesis inhibition, 50 mg/L cycloheximide was added to the transport medium in both compartments. For sodium replacement, energy depletion and protein synthesis inhibition, the cells were preincubated in the appropriate transport medium for 30 min. For the experiments at 4°C, cells were preincubated for 30 min at 4°C before the addition of the labeled probes. The effect of acidification of the donor solution on L-Pro transport was studied by adding HBSS at pH 6.0 (buffered with 10 mmol/L 2-[N-morpholino]ethanesulfonic acid) in the donor compartment and HBSS at pH 7.4 in the acceptor compartment. The absence of toxicity of these experimental conditions was checked by optical phase contrast microscopy examination and assayed by measurement of the TEER at the end of the transport experiment. For the competition experiments, an excess of unlabeled amino acid or synthetic analog (1 mmol/L) was added to the donor compartment together with the radioactive L-Pro.
Intracellular accumulation.
At the end of the transport experiment (180 min), the cell monolayers
were washed six times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then
resuspended in 1 mL of 10 g/L deoxycholic acid sodium salt adjusted to
pH 11.3 with NaOH. After 10 min at room temperature, the cells were
removed by scraping and disrupted by ultrasonication. The radioactivity
of 100 µL of the cell homogenate was measured to determine the amount
of L-Pro taken up. The amount of cell protein was measured
by the method of Lowry (Lowry et al. 1951
) using bovine
serum albumin as a standard. Then, 100 µL of the cell homogenate was
also precipitated with 100 µL of a 250 g/L TCA solution in the
presence of 10 µL fetal bovine serum as a protein carrier for 30 min
at 4°C. At the end of the incubation, the TCA-insoluble pellet,
representing amino acid incorporation into newly synthesized proteins,
was separated from the soluble fraction through centrifugation at 5200
x g for 10 min, and the soluble fraction was
assessed for radioactivity.
Efflux experiments.
The cells monolayers were loaded with 10 µmol/L L-[3H]Pro for 15 min at 37°C and then washed three times with ice-cold PBS. The intracellular accumulation of L-[3H]Pro was determined on three samples as described earlier. For the other inserts, the loaded L-[3H]Pro was then allowed to efflux into the media bathing the AP and BL sides of the monolayers. After various durations, ranging from 10 to 90 min, the amounts of L-[3H]Pro released were determined by measuring the radioactivity of 100 µL samples withdrawn from the AP and BL media.
Radioactive measurements.
For all of the experiments, the amount of radioactive material was analyzed by liquid scintillation spectrometry with a Packard Tri-Carb 1600 TR instrument (Packard Instrument Company, Meriden, CT) after dispersion in 2 mL Aqualuma cocktail (Lumac; LSC, Groningen, the Netherlands).
Biotransformation.
The extent of L-Pro biotransformation by the Caco-2 cells was checked at the end of the transport experiment (180 min). For this purpose, the identity of the 3H label (either in the donor compartment or collected from the acceptor compartment, as well as that of the non-TCA precipitable cell fraction) was determined at the end of the incubation period by thin layer chromatography (TLC) on silica plates (0.25 mm thick on glass supports, 20 x 20 cm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using n-butanol/acetic acid/water (4:1:1) as the mobile phase. A solution of L-Pro (2 g/L) dissolved in HBSS was used as a reference to determine the position of the imino acid on the silica plate. At the end of the migration, the plates were stained with ninhydrin reagent (0.2% in ethanol; Sigma-Aldrich NV/SA, Bornem, Belgium), and each lane was divided vertically into 1-cm blocks. Each block of silica was scraped and poured into a scintillation vial together with 2 mL Aqualuma cocktail and underwent liquid scintillation counting as described.
The level of L-Pro biotransformation into other amino acids
by the Caco-2 cells was checked through HPLC analysis of cellular
extracts and culture media. Increases in various amino acids were
examined by comparison with a reference sample. After a preincubation
of 30 min at 37°C in HBSS, the cells were incubated for an additional
3 h at 37°C with 100 µmol/L L-Pro in HBSS or with
HBSS alone (reference sample) in the donor compartment and with HBSS in
the acceptor compartment. Samples of cellular extracts and culture
media were deproteinized and underwent HPLC analysis as described by
Fekkes et al. (1995)
with minor modifications. The HPLC
system consisted of a P4000 pump and a Thermo Separation Products
degassing device (Thermo Separation Products, San Jose, CA), a RF-551
fluorescence detector (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) and a Carlo Erba
Instruments integrator (Milano, Italy). A 5-µm Spherisorb ODS 2
column (125 x 3 mm I.D.) (Waters, Milford, MA) was used.
Data analysis.
Results are expressed as means ± SD. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with a Dunnett post hoc test for comparisons between test assays and controls or a Tukey post hoc test for multiple comparisons. The computer program was Systat 5.2.1 (Systat, Evanston, IL).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The passages of D-[14C]mannitol and
L-[3H]Pro were studied on Caco-2
cells cultivated for 1719 d after seeding over the time range of
0180 min with a 60-min sampling interval (Fig. 1
). To facilitate direct comparison, the results are presented as
clearance, which is, by definition, the volume of plasma containing the
amount of substance that is removed by the kidney per unit of time. By
analogy, in this study, we defined clearance as the equivalent volume
of solution (µL) containing the amount of labeled material that
passed across the cell monolayer. The results indicate that the
passages of D-[14C]mannitol and
L-[3H]Pro were proportional to the
duration of the experiment. The clearance rate of
D-[14C]mannitol was similar in the
AP-to-BL and BL-to-AP directions, reaching values of 16 and 11 µL ·
insert-1 · h-1,
respectively. The passage of L-Pro was systematically
higher than that of
D-[14C]mannitol. In addition, the
transport of L-Pro in the AP-to-BL direction was
significantly higher than that in the BL-to-AP direction, suggesting
that the distribution of the transport carriers is polarized.
|
After a 3-h incubation with 10 µmol/L
L-[3H]Pro, the Caco-2 cells
accumulated 3H-labeled material corresponding to
1 100 ± 114 pmol/mg cell protein from the AP pole and to 467
± 169 pmol/mg cell protein from the BL pole. The proportion of
3H-labeled material precipitable by TCA was 50
± 14 and 36 ± 15% from the AP and BL poles, respectively.
The intracellular concentration of 3H label
recovered as radioactive TCA-soluble material, calculated on the
basis of a cellular volume for Caco-2 cells of 3.66 µL/mg cell
protein (Brunham et al. 1989
), was 148 ± 48
µmol/L from the AP side and 85 ± 47 µmol/L from the BL side.
These results suggest that Caco-2 cells concentrated the
3H-labeled material from both the AP and BL sides
of the monolayers and accumulated it preferentially from the AP pole.
In both cases,
3050% of the accumulated
3H-labeled material was incorporated into newly
synthesized proteins.
Biotransformation of L-Pro.
After 3 h of incubation of Caco-2 cell monolayers with 10 µmol/L L-[3H]Pro, the identity of the 3H label in the AP and BL bathing solutions as well as in the TCA-soluble cell-associated fraction was determined with TLC. Regardless of the compartment in which L-[3H]Pro was added, the 3H signal in the solution bathing the BL side was typical of L-[3H]Pro and no other major radioactive products were detected. In contrast, several other radioactive products were detected in the solutions bathing the AP side: they amounted to 73 and 57% of the 3H-labeled material recovered when L-[3H]Pro was added at the AP and BL sides, respectively. These various radioactive products were also detected in the TCA-soluble cell-associated fraction: they represented 66 and 61% of the TCA-soluble 3H-labeled material accumulated from the AP and BL sides, respectively. The results suggest that L-Pro was extensively metabolized by the Caco-2 cells and that the products of metabolism were selectively excreted at the AP side of the cells.
HPLC analysis gave no indication that the final products of the metabolism of L-Pro by the Caco-2 cells would consist of some of the amino acids commonly found in proteins.
Because of this extensive metabolism, the radioactive material detected in the solution bathing the AP side as well as accumulated by the cells does not correspond exclusively to L-[3H]Pro and is expressed as L-Pro equivalents in the next sections.
Concentration dependence of transport and accumulation.
The transport of L-Pro was investigated at different
concentrations ranging from 100 µmol/L to 50 mmol/L in the AP-to-BL
and BL-to-AP directions. The transport rate of L-Pro in the
AP-to-BL direction increased at first and then tapered off at
concentrations of >5 mmol/L (Fig. 2
). This curve likely represents the contribution of a saturable process
as well as a nonsaturable one to total L-Pro transport. In
contrast, transport in the BL-to-AP direction was strictly proportional
to the concentration over the entire range.
|
|
Supplementation of the transport medium with 1 mmol/L
NaN3 and 50 mmol/L 2-DOG significantly decreased
the AP-to-BL transport of L-Pro, whereas it increased the
BL-to-AP transport (Table 1
). The results also show that treatment of the monolayers with these
metabolic inhibitors increased the passage of D-mannitol
through tight junctions.
|
The transport of amino acids has been described to be coupled with
Na+ (Christensen 1990
,
Maillard et al. 1995
). Therefore, we studied the
transport of L-Pro in the absence of
Na+. The substitution of sodium chloride in the
transport medium with choline chloride decreased the AP-to-BL transport
of L-Pro: the transport in the absence of
Na+ was decreased to 25% of control (Table 1)
.
In contrast, the substitution of Na+ with choline
slightly increased the BL-to-AP transport. The addition of atropine (10
µmol/L) in the Na+-free medium, to abolish the
possible muscarinic effects of choline, did not significantly affect
the transport of L-Pro in either direction (data not
shown). A similar inhibition of the AP-to-BL transport (to 29% of
control) was observed on the addition of 100 µmol/L amiloride to the
Na+-containing transport medium.
Treatment of the monolayers with cycloheximide did not significantly affect the transepithelial transport of L-Pro
(Table 1)
.
Acidification of the donor compartment to pH 6.0 (with pH of the acceptor compartment being maintained at pH 7.4) did not affect the transport of L-[3H]Pro in the AP-to-BL direction or of L-[3H]Pro equivalents in the BL-to-AP direction (data not shown).
To explore the substrate specificity of the L-Pro carrier
systems, we compared the transport of 10 µmol/L
L-[3H]Pro in the absence or
presence of a 1 mmol/L concentration of various unlabeled amino acids
or synthetic analogs in the donor compartment (Fig. 4
). The most potent inhibitors of the AP-to-BL transport were MeAIB and
L-hydroxyproline. The stereoisomer D-Pro showed
lower inhibition. The small neutral amino acids (L-Ala and
glycine), the non
-amino acid ß-Ala, the cationic amino acid
L-His, the large neutral amino acids (L-Phe and
L-Leu) and AIB did not interfere with the AP-to-BL
transport of L-Pro. BL-to-AP transport was unaffected by
any of the tested compounds, indicating that AP-to-BL and BL-to-AP
transports were mediated by different mechanisms.
|
The accumulation of L-Pro equivalents from both the AP and
BL poles of the Caco-2 cells was significantly reduced by metabolic
inhibitors, by an incubation at 4°C and, to a lesser extent, by
cycloheximide (Table 2
). Under these conditions, the incorporation of
L-[3H]Pro into TCA-precipitable
proteins became very low.
|
90% from
both AP and BL sides of the cells (Table 2)The amount of intracellular 3H-labeled material in the TCA-soluble fraction was drastically reduced by the metabolic inhibitors, by an incubation at 4°C and in the absence of Na+ (not shown).
Acidification of the transport medium in the donor compartment to pH
6.0 significantly decreased the accumulation from the BL side of the
Caco-2 cells but not from the AP side (Table 2)
.
Substrate selectivity of the systems responsible for
L-Pro accumulation was determined by coincubation of 10
µmol/L L-[3H]Pro with a 100-fold
excess of various unlabeled amino acids or synthetic analogs. The
results (Fig. 5
) indicate that MeAIB and L-hydroxyproline inhibited
accumulation from both AP and BL sides of the cells; D-Pro
inhibited accumulation from the AP side but not from the BL side;
glycine, L-Ala, L-His and AIB inhibited
accumulation from the BL side but not from the AP side and ß-Ala,
L-Leu and L-Phe had no effect on accumulation
from either side of the cells.
|
Uptake and efflux of L-Pro.
Monolayers were preloaded from either the AP side (for BL efflux
studies) or the BL side (for AP efflux studies) of the cells with 10
µmol/L L-[3H]Pro for 15 min. The
accumulation level of L-Pro equivalents achieved under
these conditions is given in Figure 6
(inset). After washing the cell monolayers with ice-cold
PBS, the efflux of the preloaded L-Pro equivalents from the
BL or AP side of the monolayers was monitored as a function
of time at 37°C (Fig. 6)
. The amount effluxed at the AP
side did not significantly increase after 20 min, whereas the amount effluxed at the BL side continued to increase until the end of
the experiment (90 min). Most of the preloaded
3H-labeled material from the AP side of the cells
(
60%) was released at their BL side. This radioactivity
corresponded exclusively to
L-[3H]Pro, because no
metabolites were detected by TLC in the medium bathing the BL pole of the Caco-2 cells (see earlier). In addition, 62 ± 4% of the
cell-associated radioactivity at the end of the efflux experiment
was precipitable by TCA, indicating that the 3H
label not effluxed principally corresponded to
L-[3H]Pro incorporated
into proteins. Some of the preloaded 3H-labeled
material from the BL side (
35%) was released at the AP side,
and 33 ± 10% of the cell-associated radioactivity at the end
of the efflux experiment was precipitable by TCA. These results
indicate that the accumulated 3H-labeled
material was rather selectively effluxed at the BL side of the Caco-2
cells, in the form of intact
L-[3H]Pro.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
TLC analysis showed that L-Pro was extensively metabolized
after uptake by the Caco-2 cells with selective excretion of the
metabolites at the AP side of the cells. HPLC analysis indicated that
the metabolites did not consist of some of the other amino acids
commonly found in proteins. In contrast,
3H-labeled material recovered in the medium
bathing the BL pole of the cells was associated with molecules of
intact L-[3H]Pro. In pig
enterocytes, L-Pro has been shown to be degraded mainly
into ornithine, citrulline and arginine:
8090% of utilized
L-Pro carbons was recovered in ornithine plus citrulline
plus arginine (Wu 1997
). In addition, Wu (1997)
showed that the mitochondrial enzyme proline oxidase was
present in the pig small intestine. It was therefore proposed that
proline oxidase catalyzes the oxidation of L-Pro into
pyrroline-5-carboxylate (Dillon et al. 1999
, Wu 1997
). Ornithine aminotransferase then catalyzes the
transamination of pyrroline-5-carboxylate with glutamate to form
ornithine, which is subsequently converted to citrulline by ornithine
carbamoyltransferase. Citrulline is then converted to arginine through
the successive action of arginosuccinate synthase and arginosuccinate
lyase. On the basis of these findings from pigs, a widely used animal
model to study human intestinal physiology, it can be expected that
L-Pro would also be converted to ornithine, citrulline and
arginine in the human intestine. However, this could not be confirmed
in our model because the HPLC method used in this study did not detect
ornithine and citrulline.
The transport of L-Pro in the AP-to-BL direction was much faster than that in the opposite direction, indicating the presence in the Caco-2 cells of one or more specific polarized systems for the transepithelial transport of L-Pro. In addition, the passage of L-Pro in the AP-to-BL direction was much faster than that of D-mannitol, suggesting that the transcellular pathway of L-Pro in the AP-to-BL direction outweighed the paracellular pathway.
The AP-to-BL transport of L-Pro was demonstrated to be a
carrier-mediated process by the following observations:
1) it exhibited strong temperature dependence, 2)
it was significantly reduced by energy depletion, 3) it was
saturable and 4) it was Na+ dependent.
The presence of metabolic inhibitors reduced the AP-to-BL transport to
57% of control, although the real energy dependence may be higher.
Indeed, the increase in the
D-[14C]mannitol passage
through treatment of the monolayers with metabolic inhibitors could
result from tight junction alteration, because the gate function of
tight junctions is itself ATP dependent and probably was affected by
this strong energy depletion (Mandel et al. 1993
). An
alternative explanation could be that the 2-DOG at the high
concentration used (50 mmol/L) could have an osmotic effect on the
cells, resulting in a stimulation of the paracellular passage of
L-Pro. This hypothesis was tested by measuring the
transepithelial passage of
D-[14C]mannitol in the
presence of 50 mmol/L D-mannitol. The results (not shown)
did not indicate any differences from the control condition. Kinetics
of the AP-to-BL transport suggest the contribution of a saturable
component and a nonsaturable one to total L-Pro transport.
The nonsaturable component likely corresponds to the paracellular
pathway and the transcellular diffusion of L-Pro across
Caco-2 cell monolayers.
In contrast, BL-to-AP transport of L-Pro was not inhibited by energy depletion or by removal of sodium from the transport medium and was unsaturable. This suggests that transport in the BL-to-AP direction mainly results from passive movement by transcellular passive diffusion and/or through the paracellular pathway. The reduction in the BL-to-AP transport (to 51%) observed when the temperature of incubation was lowered from 37°C to 4°C may in part result from a decrease in the cellular membrane fluidity at 4°C.
The following arguments indicate that uptake of L-Pro from both the AP and BL sides of the cells occurred via a carrier-mediated pathway. 1) Accumulation from both sides was significantly reduced in the presence of metabolic inhibitors or after a decrease in the incubation temperature to 4°C. These reductions seem to be the result of a simultaneous inhibitory action on both protein synthesis and carrier-mediated transport because the incorporation of L-[3H]Pro into newly synthesized proteins and the amount of 3H-labeled material recovered in the TCA-soluble fraction were significantly decreased under these experimental conditions. 2) AP and BL accumulations were both shown to be markedly Na+ dependent. Kinetics of AP accumulation suggest the contribution of a saturable and a nonsaturable, probably diffusional, component to total transport, whereas BL accumulation was not saturable.
L-Pro is largely cationic at pH values below its
isoelectric point, pI = 6.3 (Boyer 1993
).
Therefore, the decrease in the amount of L-Pro equivalents
accumulated from the BL side of the cells at pH 6.0 could result from a
decrease in the affinity of L-Pro for the carriers.
To determine the type of amino acid carriers involved in the
transepithelial transport of L-Pro, the
cross-inhibition profiles of L-Pro transport and
accumulation were compared with those of the
Na+-dependent neutral amino acids carriers
described by Christensen (1990)
. The strong inhibition
of the AP-to-BL transport and of the AP and BL accumulations by MeAIB
indicates that system ASC is not responsible for L-Pro
transport and accumulation in the Caco-2 cells. Similarly, AP-to-BL
transport and AP accumulation are not mediated by system A, because
they were not inhibited by AIB and small aliphatic neutral amino acids.
In contrast, the cross-inhibition profile of BL accumulation
resembles system A: BL accumulation was strongly inhibited by AIB,
MeAIB and small aliphatic neutral amino acids (L-Ala,
glycine) but not by branched (L-Leu) or aromatic neutral
amino acids (L-Phe). Moreover, as observed here, the
activity of system A has been shown to be highly sensitive to the
extracellular pH and to decrease markedly with a decrease in pH
(McGivan et al. 1994
). AP-to-BL transport and AP
accumulation seem to be mediated by a system similar to the rabbit
IMINO system: they were Na+-dependent and
strongly inhibited by MeAIB and L-hydroxyproline but were
insensitive to ß-Ala, L-Ala and glycine.
In a previous report on L-Pro transport in Caco-2 cells
(Nicklin et al. 1992
), the uptake of L-Pro
has been shown to be saturable, energy dependent and
Na+ dependent. In competition experiments, strong
inhibition of L-Pro uptake was found with MeAIB, AIB,
L-Ala and L-Ser, whereas moderate inhibition
was observed with glycine, D-Pro and
-aminoisobutyric
acid. Aromatic and branched amino acids showed no interaction with the
carrier system. The authors concluded that the carrier system
responsible for L-Pro uptake had many features in common
with the ubiquitous system A. These results were, however, obtained
with monolayers cultured on six-well plates and most likely formed
at least in part of undifferentiated Caco-2 cells. Mordrelle et al. (1996)
examined the transport of L-Pro in the
rat epithelial cell line IEC-17, which presents the characteristics of
the undifferentiated crypt cells. Their results suggested that the
transport of L-Pro was also mediated through system A. In
contrast, systems B and IMINO, which mediate the transport
of L-Pro in the rat small intestine, were absent or
expressed at a very low level in the IEC-17 cell line.
Characterization of the transport of the nonessential imino acid
L-Pro in the Caco-2 cell line was the aim of this study.
L-Pro was transported selectively in the AP-to-BL direction
by a system that has many features in common with the IMINO
system of the rabbit small intestine. By contrast, transport in the
BL-to-AP direction results mainly from passage through nonspecific
pathways (paracellular route and/or transcellular passive diffusion).
However, the transport of L-Pro across the BL membrane was
shown to be, at least in part, mediated by system A, which has also
been shown to transport L-Pro in nonepithelial cells
(Christensen 1990
) as well as in undifferentiated
intestinal cells (Mordrelle et al. 1996
). This suggests
that L-Pro that enters the intestinal cells from the BL
side via a carrier-mediated process is not delivered at their AP
side but is for the large part used for their own maintenance and
metabolism.
Finally, the results of this report confirm the usefulness of the Caco-2 cell culture system to study intestinal absorption and transport regulation of the amino acids.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
3 Abbreviations used: AIB,
-aminoisobutyric acid; AP, apical; BL, basolateral; 2-DOG, 2-deoxyglucose; HBSS, Hanks balanced salt solution; MeAIB, (methylamino)-
-isobutyric acid; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; TCA, trichloroacetic acid; TEER, transepithelial electrical resistance; TLC, thin layer chromatography. ![]()
Manuscript received February 8, 2000. Initial review completed March 22, 2000. Revision accepted July 25, 2000.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Boyer F. B. pKa values and pHi values of amino acids. Modern Experimental Biochemistry 2nd ed. 1993:523 The Benjamin/Cummings Publishing Company Inc Redwood City, CA.
2.
Brunham D. B., Fondacaro J. D. Secretagogue-induced protein phosphorylation and chloride transport in Caco-2 cells. Am. J. Physiol. 1989;256:G808-G816
3.
Christensen H. N. Role of amino acid transport and countertransport in nutrition and metabolism. Physiol. Rev. 1990;70:43-77
4.
Dillon E. L., Knabe D. A., Wu G. Lactate inhibits citrulline and arginine synthesis from proline in pig enterocytes. Am. J. Physiol. 1999;276:G1079-G1086
5. Fekkes D., van Dalen A., Edelman M., Voskuilen A. Validation of the determination of amino acids in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography using automated pre-column derivatization with o- phthaldialdehyde. J. Chromatogr. B. Biomed. Appl. 1995;669:177-186[Medline]
6. Ganapathy V., Brandsch M., Leibach F. H. Intestinal transport of amino acids and peptides. Johnson L. R. eds. Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract 3rd ed. 1994:1773-1794 Raven Press New York, NY.
7. Halleux C., Schneider .-J. Iron absorption by intestinal epithelial cells: 1. Caco 2 cells cultivated in serum-free medium, on polyethyleneterephthalate microporous membranes, as an in vitro model. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 1991;27A:293-302
8. Hayashi K., Yamamoto S.-I., Ohe K., Miyoshi A., Kawasaki T. Na+-gradient-dependent transport of L-proline and analysis of its carrier system in brush-border membrane vesicles of the guinea pig ileum. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1980;601:654-663[Medline]
9. Hidalgo I., Raub T., Borchardt R. Characterization of human colon carcinoma cell line (Caco-2) as a model system for intestinal epithelial permeability. Gastroenterology 1989;96:736-749[Medline]
10. Hidalgo I. J., Li J. Carrier-mediated transport and efflux mechanisms in Caco-2 cells. Adv. Drug Del. Rev. 1996;22:53-66
11.
Lowry O. H., Rosebrough N. J., Farr A. L., Randall R. J. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951;193:265-275
12. Maillard M. E., Stevens B. R., Mann G. E. Amino acid transport by small intestinal, hepatic and pancreatic epithelia. Gastroenterology 1995;108:888-910[Medline]
13. Malo C. Multiple pathways of amino acid transport in brush border membrane vesicles isolated from the human fetal small intestine. Gastroenterology 1991;100:1644-1652[Medline]
14. Mandel L. J., Bacallao R., Zampighi G. Uncoupling of the molecular fence and paracellular gate functions in epithelial tight junctions. Nature (Lond.) 1993;361:552-555[Medline]
15. McGivan J. D., Pastor-Anglada M. Regulatory and molecular aspects of mammalian amino acid transport. Biochem J 1994;299:321-334
16. Mircheff A. K., van Os C. H., Wright E. M. Pathways for alanine transport in intestinal basal lateral membranes vesicles. J. Membr. Biol. 1980;52:83-92[Medline]
17. Mordrelle A., Huneau J.-F., Cormet E., Tomé D. Involvement of system A in proline transport in the intestinal crypt-like cell line IEC-17. Nutr. Biochem. 1996;7:431-436
18.
Munck B. G. Transport of imino acids and non-
-amino acids across the brush-border membrane of the rabbit ileum. J. Membr. Biol. 1985;83:15-24[Medline]
19. Munck B. G., Munck L. K., Rasmussen S. N., Polache A. Specificity of the imino acid carrier in rat small intestine: Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 1994;35:R1154-R1161
20.
Munck L. K., Munck B. G. Chloride-dependent intestinal transport of imino and ß-amino acids in the guinea pig and rat. Am. J. Physiol. 1994;266:R997-R1007
21. Nicklin P. L., Irwin W. J., Hassan I. F., Mackay M. Proline uptake by monolayers of human intestinal absorptive (Caco-2) cells in vitro. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1992;1104:283-292[Medline]
22.
Pappenheimer J. R. On the coupling of membrane digestion with intestinal absorption of sugars and amino acids. Am. J. Physiol. 1993;265:G409-G417
23. Satoh O., Kudo H., Yamada K., Kawasaki T. Characterisation of amino-acid transport systems in guinea-pig intestinal brush-border membrane. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1989;985:120-126[Medline]
24. Schneider Y.-J. Optimisation of hybridoma cell growth and monoclonal antibody secretion in a chemically defined serum- and protein-free culture medium. J. Immunol. Methods 1989;116:65-77[Medline]
25. Sergent-Engelen T., Delistrie V., Schneider Y.-J. Phase I and II biotransformations in living Caco 2 cells cultivated under serum-free conditions. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1993;46:1393-1401[Medline]
26. Stevens B. R., Ross H. J., Wright E. M. Multiple transport pathways for neutral amino acids in rabbit jejunal brush border vesicles. J. Membr. Biol. 1982;66:213-225[Medline]
27. Stevens B. R., Wright E. M. Substrate specificity of the intestinal brush-border proline/sodium (IMINO) transporter. J. Membr. Biol. 1985;87:27-34[Medline]
28.
Stevens B. R., Wright E. M. Kinetics of the intestinal brush border proline (imino) carrier. J. Biol. Chem. 1987;262:6546-6551
29.
Wu G. Synthesis of citrulline and arginine from proline in enterocytes of postnatal pigs. Am. J. Physiol. 1997;272:G1382-G1390
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Broer Amino Acid Transport Across Mammalian Intestinal and Renal Epithelia Physiol Rev, January 1, 2008; 88(1): 249 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Metzner, J. Kalbitz, and M. Brandsch Transport of Pharmacologically Active Proline Derivatives by the Human Proton-Coupled Amino Acid Transporter hPAT1 J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., April 1, 2004; 309(1): 28 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
V. Berger, Y. Larondelle, A. Trouet, and Y.-J. Schneider Transport Mechanisms of the Large Neutral Amino Acid L-Phenylalanine in the Human Intestinal Epithelial Caco-2 Cell Line J. Nutr., November 1, 2000; 130(11): 2780 - 2788. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||