Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, P. J.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2000;130:2718-2725.)
© 2000 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Articles

Biomarkers of Human Colonic Cell Growth Are Influenced Differently by a History of Colonic Neoplasia and the Consumption of Acarbose1 ,2

Gary A. Weaver*,{dagger}3, Colette T. Tangel{dagger}, Jean A. Krause{dagger}, Margaret M. Parfitt{dagger}, James J. Stragand*, Paul L. Jenkins{dagger}, Tara A. Erb{dagger}, Roger H. Davidson{dagger}, Harlan D. Alpern**, William B. Guiney, Jr.** and Paul J. Higgins{ddagger}

* Department of Medicine, {dagger} Research Institute and ** Department of Pathology, The Mary Imogene Bassett Hospital, Cooperstown, NY 13326 and {ddagger} Center for Cell Biology and Cancer Research, The Albany Medical College, Albany, NY 12208

3To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed at 287 Long Point Road, Harpswell, ME 04079.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The nutritional effects of butyrate on the colonic mucosa and studies of transformed cells suggest that butyrate has anti-colon cancer effects. If butyrate has antineoplastic effects, mucosal growth contrasts between normal subjects and those with a history of colonic neoplasia would parallel changes in growth characteristics caused by butyrate in a colon neoplasia population. To test this hypothesis, rectal biopsies from a survey of colonoscopy patients (n = 50) with and without a history of colonic neoplasia (controls) were compared. Similarly, rectal biopsies were compared from subjects (n = 44) with a colon neoplasia history in an acarbose-placebo crossover trial. Control subjects in the colonoscopy survey had higher bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) uptake than subjects with a history of neoplasia (P = 0.05). The control subjects also had a higher correlation of BrdU and Ki-67 labeling (P = 0.003). Both findings were paralleled by acarbose use. Acarbose augmented BrdU uptake (P = 0.0001) and improved the correlation of BrdU and Ki-67 labeling (P = 0.013). Acarbose also augmented fecal butyrate (P = 0.0001), which was positively correlated with Ki-67 labeling (P = 0.003). p52 antigen had an earlier pattern of crypt distribution in subjects with a history of colon neoplasia but was not affected by acarbose use. Lewis-Y antigen was expressed earlier in the crypt with acarbose but had similar expression in the colonoscopy survey groups. The use of acarbose to enhance fecal butyrate concentration produced mucosal changes paralleling the findings in control subjects as opposed to those with neoplasia, supporting the concept of an antineoplastic role for butyrate.


KEY WORDS: • human colon cancer • acarbose • short-chain fatty acids • colonic crypt cell proliferation • butyric acid


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Butyrate, formed by microbial fermentation, is a preferred colonocyte energy source (Roediger 1980Citation ) and induces differentiation in both the rumen mucosa (Sander et al. 1959Citation ) and colon tumor cells (Tsao et al. 1982Citation , Whitehead et al. 1986Citation ). Although butyrate inhibits growth of transformed cells in vitro (Kim et al. 1980Citation , Kruh 1982Citation , Morita et al. 1982Citation , Whitehead et al. 1986Citation ), in vivo animal studies (Lupton and Kurtz 1993Citation , Sakata 1987Citation , Velázquez et al. 1996bCitation ) and in vitro human studies (Bartram et al. 1993Citation , Scheppach et al. 1992Citation ) suggest that butyrate stimulates normal colonic mucosal proliferation. Numerous findings suggest that the short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), particularly butyrate, play a role in colon cancer prevention [for reviews see Hague et al. (1997)Citation , Hassig et al. (1997)Citation , Jass (1985)Citation , Kruh (1982)Citation , Roediger (1988)Citation , Scheppach et al. (1995)Citation and Velázquez et al. (1996a)Citation ].

Acarbose, an {alpha}-glucosidase inhibitor, slows digestion of disaccharides and starch and is used to treat diabetes (Chiasson et al. 1994Citation ). Acarbose expands the proportion of butyric acid in the SCFA of feces of subjects consuming high starch diets (Scheppach et al. 1988Citation ) and unrestricted diets (Weaver et al. 1997Citation ). Augmentation of butyrate may occur because microbial fermentation of starch produces more microbial butyrate production than fermentation of other carbohydrates such as pectin or arabinogalactan (Weaver et al. 1992Citation ). Thus, acarbose provides a means to test the effects of augmented starch fermentation and butyrate production on the colonic mucosa.

Testing the anticancer efficacy of potentially preventive agents and diets takes years, and preliminary studies using surrogate markers have been suggested (Kelloff et al. 1994Citation ). Increased proliferation or an upward shift in the crypt distribution of proliferating cells has been associated with risk for colonic neoplasia (Deschner et al. 1963Citation , Deschner and Lipkin 1975Citation , Lipkin et al. 1987Citation and 1983Citation , Paganelli et al. 1991Citation , Paspatis et al. 1998Citation , Risio et al. 1991Citation , Terpstra et al. 1987Citation ) and has been used to test preventive strategies (Alberts et al. 1990Citation , Lipkin and Newmark 1985Citation ). Although 3H-thymidine labeling was used initially to assess proliferation, comparable results between 3H-thymidine and bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) labeling of S-phase cells have been demonstrated (Lin and Allison 1993Citation , Qin and Willems 1993Citation ). Ki-67 (Sasaki et al. 1987Citation ), a nuclear antigen, is a potentially complementary marker to BrdU. BrdU labels only cells that actively synthesize DNA. Ki-67 is expressed in proliferating cells in late G1, S, G2 and M phases but not in early G1 or in nonproliferating cells (G0) (Gerdes et al. 1984Citation ). p52 is an intracellular cytoskeletal-protein of normal colonic epithelium that regulates cell shape or cell-to-substrate adhesion (Higgins et al. 1991Citation ) and occurs in the lumenal and upper crypt or maturational zones (Higgins and Tanaka 1991Citation ) and in the more highly differentiated epithelial cells of other tissues (Higgins and Tanaka 1991Citation ). Consequently, it would be expected to have a negative association with proliferation markers. Apoptosis can be estimated by measuring Lewis-Y antigen, an oligosaccharide that is commonly expressed in gastrointestinal tumors (Hiraishi et al. 1993Citation ). None of the above markers has been measured simultaneously in the same study with human subjects with a history of colonic neoplasia and subjects without neoplasia.

The first aim of this study was to determine whether the distribution of proliferative and differentiated cells detected by these biomarkers differed in the two patient populations. To this end, we compared BrdU uptake and the presence of the antigens, Ki-67, p52 and Lewis-Y, in subjects with and without a history of colonic neoplasia in a colonoscopy survey. The related aim was to compare mucosal differences from the colonoscopy survey with changes caused by augmentation of colonic fermentation and butyrate production in a second population with a history of colonic neoplasia.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Colonoscopy survey.

Subjects were patients undergoing colonoscopy. All patients received an oral electrolyte bowel preparation, Colyte (Schwarz Pharmaceuticals, Mequon, WI) or Golytely (Braintree Laboratories, Braintree, MA), containing polyethylene glycol 3350, NaCl, KCl, NaHCO3 and Na2SO4 the evening before colonoscopy.

The patients were divided into two diagnostic groups, i.e., patients with a history of colonic neoplasia (n = 26, 3 with carcinoma) and control subjects (n = 24), those patients without a history of colonic neoplasia. Exclusion criteria were as follows: incomplete colonoscopy; history of more than a limited segmental colon resection; resection of the ileocecal valve; inflammatory bowel disease; use of >750 mg calcium/d; use of >625 µg vitamin D/wk; daily use of bile salts; or antibiotic use within 1 mo. The ages of the 30 men and 20 women enrolled in the survey ranged from 35 to 78 y with a mean of 60.6 y. The mean ± SEM age for the neoplasia subjects (n = 26) and controls (n = 24) was 65.7 ± 1.97 y and 55.2 ± 2.52 y, respectively. Patients defined as having neoplasia required the presence or history of at least one of the following: 0.5 cm or greater adenoma; at least two smaller adenomas; or colon cancer. Controls had no abnormality other than diverticulosis or hyperplastic polyps. Four biopsies of normal mucosa were taken 10 cm from the anal verge during colonoscopy using standard biopsy forceps.

Acarbose trial.

The study was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled crossover trial. Subjects were randomized to receive either acarbose (100 mg three times per day) (Bayer, West Haven, CT) or placebo three times per day. After 4 mo, the subjects took no study agent for 3–4 mo and then took the opposite study agent (acarbose or placebo) for 4 mo (Fig. 1Citation ). Biopsies of normal mucosa were taken as in the colonoscopy survey but without prior bowel preparation.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Acarbose-placebo crossover trial participant flow and data collection times. SCFA, fecal short-chain fatty acids; (a) indicates time of withdrawal for three subjects leaving the study for reasons unrelated to drug side effects; (b) indicates three subjects leaving the study because of diarrhea.

 
The subject population consisted of patients who met the same entrance criteria as those in the colonoscopy survey with a history of neoplasia. Exclusion criteria were similar to those of the colonoscopy survey but also included pregnancy, use of laxatives more than once a week and diabetes.

Subjects (n = 50) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either placebo or acarbose first. Randomization, data collection points and subject withdrawals are shown in Figure 1Citation . Forty-four subjects (15 women and 29 men) completed all study visits (age range: 44.3–74.5 y with a mean of 61.9 y). For technical reasons, some analyses could not be performed. For most analyses, 43 or 44 paired subject values were available.

Placebo tablets were prepared by Bayer; they consisted primarily of starch and were identical in color, size and appearance to acarbose tablets. As subjects were recruited, they were assigned to a previously determined, computer-generated randomization schedule. Each sequence of 10 study numbers contained five assigned initially to acarbose and five assigned initially to placebo.

Compliance was monitored by counting the tablets returned at each visit. The average daily tablet intake at the completion of each treatment was 2.73 ± 0.07 for acarbose and 2.68 ± 0.07 tablets for placebo.

Histologic methods (colonoscopy survey and acarbose trial).

Biopsies were placed in Hank’s balanced salt solution (GIBCOBRL Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) for transport. The incubation solution consisted of 9 mL of RPMI-1640 medium with 0.025 mmol/L Hepes buffer and L-glutamine (GIBCOBRL Life Technologies), 1 mL of fetal calf serum and 0.05 g/L of BrdU (Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO). A mixture of 5% CO2/95%O2 gas was bubbled for 30 s into the flasks containing the incubation solution and mucosal biopsies before sealing and incubation at 37°C for 1 h in a shaker bath. After 24 h in Carnoy’s fixative, the tissues were embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections (4 µm) were taken at 40-µm intervals. Slides for BrdU, Ki-67 and Lewis-Y were deparaffinized, placed in buffer (citric acid monohydrate and sodium citrate dihydrate, pH 5.5–5.7, Biotek Solutions, Santa Barbara, CA) and microwaved. The slides were then processed through a 2-d protocol on the TechMate 1000 stainer (Biotek Solutions), using a series of Biotek reagents including intermediate buffer washes, and sequentially treated with Biotek enzyme solution containing pepsin at pH 7.0 (only BrdU) and blocking solution. Slides were incubated overnight in the primary antibody, a 1:1000 dilution of monoclonal mouse anti-BrdU (DAKO, Carpinteria, CA); a 1:100 dilution of monoclonal mouse anti-Ki-67 (Immunotech, Westbrook, ME); or a 1:75 dilution of monoclonal mouse anti-Lewis-Y antibody (DAKO). The slides were then placed in biotinylated polyvalent (rabbit, mouse, rat) secondary antibody followed by hydrogen peroxide, avidin-biotin complex, diaminobenzidine chromogen and hematoxylin counterstain (Bioteck Solutions). Control slides known to stain positively were processed with each batch of investigational slides and examined for appropriate and inappropriate staining. Slides for p52 were deparaffinized with xylene, rehydrated in a graded ethanol series and immunocytochemistry carried out basically as described by Holt et al. (1995)Citation .

Labeled hemicrypts scored per subject in the colonoscopy survey were (mean ± SEM) 66 ± 2.1 for BrdU, 64.7 ± 3 for Ki-67, 18.3 ± 1 for p52 and 34.2 ± 1.9 for Lewis-Y. Labeled hemicrypts scored per subject in the acarbose trial after acarbose use and placebo use, respectively, were (mean ± SEM) 40.4 ± 3.6 and 47.5 ± 4.1 for BrdU, 53.9 ± 3.1 and 59.1 ± 3.2 for Ki-67, 38.4 ± 4.4 and 39.7 ± 4 for Lewis-Y and 17.7 ± 0.6 and 17.7 ± 0.7 for p52. Fewer hemicrypts were sought for Lewis-Y and p52 because of the continuous distribution of these antigens. Each crypt was divided longitudinally into two hemicrypts and each cell in a column of hemicrypt cells was scored as 1 (positive staining) or 0 (no staining) with the score electronically placed in a spread sheet column and transferred to SAS. p52 slides were scored with manual recording of positive (1) or no staining (0) of each hemicrypt cell. SAS programs divided each spread sheet column into five equal compartments when the number of cells was divisible by 5. Otherwise, the lower four compartments were assigned equal numbers of cells and the remainder assigned to compartment 5. The total labeling percentage was defined as the percentage of cells labeled in a hemicrypt. The distributions of labeled crypt cells were analyzed as the percentage of compartment cells labeled in each of the five approximately equal hemicrypt compartments (number of labeled cells in a compartment divided by the number of cells in that compartment as a percentage).

Fecal samples and SCFA analyses (acarbose trial).

Subjects voided fecal samples into polypropylene biohazard bags (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA), closed the bags and placed the bags in styrofoam coolers on ice. Samples were collected the evening before or morning of study visits. When subjects were unable to collect a sample in the 24 h before a study visit, samples were collected as soon as possible after the study visit. Dry feces (Weaver et al. 1986Citation ) and SCFA (Weaver et al. 1997Citation ) were determined on fecal suspensions.

Dietary history.

Acarbose trial subjects recorded what they ate for the 4 d before each study visit. These diet records were analyzed using the Nutritional Data System (Nutrition Coordinating Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN).

Statistical methods (colonoscopy survey and acarbose trial).

The sample size estimate for the colonoscopy survey was based on the results of Risio et al. (1991)Citation , suggesting that a sample of 25 in each diagnostic group would provide a power of 0.83 to detect a difference in labeling index of 2.0 between the groups with an {alpha} of 0.05 (two-tailed).

Sample size estimates for the acarbose trial were based initially on the results of a wheat bran trial (Alberts et al. 1990Citation ). Six of eight high labeling patients significantly lessened labeling with wheat bran treatment. Using these proportions, a sample size of 40 with an {alpha} of 0.05 (two-tailed) and a proportional difference of 0.3 would have a power of 0.83. A requirement for 40 subjects was also deduced from the results of our colonoscopy survey described in this report using BrdU labeling of crypt compartment 3. Fifty subjects were enrolled, with the anticipation that 10 would drop out of the study.

Statistical analyses were carried out with the Statistical Analysis System (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) using a MicroVAX 3190 computer. Differences between diagnostic groups for the colonoscopy survey were tested using mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA with crypt compartment as a repeated measure. Bonferroni t tests were used to isolate crypt compartment differences.

The primary outcomes for the acarbose trial, i.e., changes in histologic labeling and SCFA between acarbose and placebo treatments, were assessed using two-way repeated-measures ANOVA to examine treatment (acarbose or placebo) and duration of treatment for SCFA (1, 2 or 4 mo of treatment) or crypt compartments (1–5) for the histologic methods. Type III sum-of-squares error terms were used for analyses except as noted.

The secondary outcomes, correlations between labeling methods and SCFA, used Pearson’s correlation coefficients. Correlation coefficients were compared for differences between diagnostic groups or treatment-related changes using Fisher’s z test for difference between two correlation coefficients.

Intestinal gas symptoms were rated on a scale of 1 to 10 with 5 being the normal condition, 1 indicated fewer and 10 more symptoms. These scores were compared by repeated-measures ANOVA. Dietary variables were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA as described above for the SCFA. All data values are expressed as the mean ± SEM.

Study approval.

Both studies were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of Bassett Hospital. Signed informed consent was obtained from each subject after a detailed discussion of the study plan and potential risks.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Colonoscopy survey.

The BrdU and Ki-67 total labeling percentages and compartment labeling percentages are shown in Figure 2Citation . Percentages of both markers lessened as the surface was approached, as expected for markers of proliferation. The control group had a higher percentage of BrdU-labeled cells. Bonferroni t tests for BrdU labeling of individual crypt compartments did not reach the P < 0.01 required for significance (P-values for the differences between crypts 3, 4 and 5 of the two groups were 0.012, 0.026 and 0.029, respectively). Crypt compartment scores for BrdU labeling were used to predict the diagnostic group using a stepwise logistic regression procedure. The best prediction of diagnostic group was achieved when the data for compartment 3 alone were used. Predicted probabilities were concordant 69.3% and discordant 30.3%. The {chi}2 score for the third BrdU compartment was 6.444 (P = 0.011).



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and Ki-67 total labeling percentages and compartment labeling percentages. Left panels: BrdU (upper panel) and Ki-67 (lower panel) distributions in colonoscopy survey biopsies. Right panels: BrdU (upper panel) and Ki-67 (lower panel) distributions in colonic biopsies after acarbose trial treatment periods. Whole column represents the percentage of labeled hemicrypt cells. Crypt compartments 1–5 represent compartments from base (1) to surface (5) with essentially equal numbers of cells in each compartment. Percentages for each compartment are the percentage of compartment cells that are labeled. Percentages are means ± SEM. Statistical values are from ANOVA for diagnostic groups or treatment periods. No significant diagnostic group differences were present for Ki-67 for the colonoscopy survey.

 
Ki-67 labeling percentages showed no significant differences between the two diagnostic groups. Crypt length from Ki-67 analysis was 51.6 ± 0.9 cells. The percentage of Ki-67 labeling was roughly double the percentage of BrdU labeling (Fig. 3Citation ).



View larger version (140K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Photomicrographs of a colonic crypt with adjacent sections stained for bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and Ki-67. Dark brown nuclei are labeled. Left panel: stained for BrdU; right panel: stained for Ki-67. The original magnification was X60.

 
Correlations between BrdU and Ki-67 labeling were higher for controls than for neoplasia subjects (Table 1Citation ). When the correlation coefficients of individual compartments were compared, the correlations between the two labeling methods were significantly different between diagnostic groups for compartment 4 and approached significance (P = 0.06) in compartment 3.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Comparison of correlations between BrdU and Ki-67 crypt-labeling percentages and butyrate percentage and Ki-67 labeling percentages1

 
The percentage of cells labeled with p52 and Lewis-Y antigens increased as the surface was approached (Fig. 4Citation ). There was no significant difference in the percentage of labeling between groups for either p52 or Lewis-Y antigens. There was a significant difference in the pattern of labeling for p52, consistent with earlier expression of p52 antigen in the neoplasia group.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. The percentage of cells labeled with p52 and Lewis-Y antigens. Left panels: p52 (upper panel) and Lewis-Y (lower panel) distributions in colonoscopy survey biopsies. Right panels: p52 (upper panel) and Lewis-Y (lower panel) distributions in colonic biopsies after acarbose trial treatment periods. Whole column represents the percentage of labeled hemicrypt cells. Crypt compartments 1–5 represent compartments from base (1) to surface (5) with essentially equal numbers of cells in each compartment. Percentages for each compartment are the percentage of compartment cells that are labeled. Percentages are means ± SEM. ANOVA values for p52 for diagnostic groups and the interaction term for crypt compartment-diagnostic group are shown. No significant diagnostic group differences were present for Lewis-Y for the colonoscopy survey. No significant treatment period differences were present for p52 for the acarbose trial. Significant ANOVA values shown for Lewis-Y for the acarbose trial are as follows: treatment differences, treatment-crypt compartment interaction and post-hoc tests.

 
Acarbose trial.

Scores rating rectal gas and intestinal gas discomfort were both higher during acarbose use (P = 0.0001). The scores for gas output at the completion of each treatment were 8.1 ± 0.2 for acarbose and 5.6 ± 0.3 for placebo and were consistent with augmentation of colonic fermentation during acarbose use.

No important dietary changes were noted between treatment periods. Nutritional Data System variables, total carbohydrate, percentage of carbohydrate, total fiber, soluble fiber, insoluble fiber, pectin, starch, sucrose, galactose, glucose, fructose, lactose and vegetable protein were examined by ANOVA. The only changes noted were higher sucrose consumption at the 1-mo placebo visit and an average of 2 g/d less lactose consumption during acarbose use.

Butyric acid concentrations and percentages of total SCFA were augmented with acarbose treatment (Fig. 5Citation ). The ANOVA interaction term for butyric acid for Treatment and Time was not significant, suggesting that steady states of butyrate production were present. Acetate and propionate percentages of total SCFA and propionate concentrations lessened with acarbose treatment.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations (upper panel) and percentages (lower panel) of total SCFA (sum of the concentrations of acetic, propionic, butyric, isobutyric, isovaleric, valeric and caproic acids) in fecal samples after 1, 2 and 4 mo of treatment in the acarbose trial. Statistical values are from ANOVA for treatment differences.

 
BrdU and Ki-67 labeling (Fig. 2)Citation were more concentrated with acarbose use than placebo. The interaction term for Treatment and Crypt Compartment was not significant. Crypt length measured in cells during Ki-67 assessment lengthened with acarbose use (60.9 ± 1) compared with placebo use (55.4 ± 0.8) by paired t test (P = 0.0001), consistent with growth stimulation. Correlation coefficients between BrdU and Ki-67 labeling improved with acarbose treatment (Table 1)Citation .

The p52 antigen (Paganelli et al. 1993Citation ) was most concentrated in the lumenal compartments but did not change with the two treatments (Fig. 4)Citation . Lewis-Y antigen universally stained the mucosal surface and the percentage of crypt cells in compartments 2 and 3 was greater with acarbose treatment (Fig. 4)Citation .

Associations of fermentation products and proliferation markers were sought using correlation coefficients and stepwise linear regression. The most consistent and significant relationship was between Ki-67 labeling and fecal butyrate concentration and percentage of total SCFA (Table 1)Citation . Ki-67 labeling and butyrate were positively correlated with acarbose use, whereas some negative correlations were present with placebo use. No significant correlation patterns were present between BrdU labeling and SCFA concentrations or percentages.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Colonoscopy survey.

Expansion of mucosal cell proliferation has been suggested as both a marker of risk for colon cancer and an important factor in carcinogenesis. Although some crypt labeling studies (Deschner and Lipkin 1975Citation , Lipkin et al. 1987Citation , Paganelli et al. 1991Citation , Paspatis et al. 1998Citation , Risio et al. 1991Citation , Terpstra et al. 1987Citation ) support these concepts, our colonoscopy survey results did not show expansion of proliferation in subjects with a history of colonic neoplasia. Other crypt labeling studies (Jass et al. 1997Citation , Kashtan et al. 1992Citation , Kohn et al. 1997Citation , Marra et al. 1994Citation , Rozen et al. 1998Citation , Wong et al. 1995Citation ) and flow cytometric studies (Nakamura et al. 1995Citation , Nsien et al. 1991Citation ) do not support expansion of proliferation as a marker of risk. Furthermore, patchy expansion of the proliferative zone into the upper crypt (Lipkin 1974Citation ) as initially described may be explained by areas of microadenoma (Jass et al. 1997Citation , Nakamura et al. 1995Citation ). Confounding variables could potentially explain conflicting results; however, we found no influence on our results of the potential confounders of age, family history of neoplasia or a history of hyperplastic polyps. Because of the variable results of studies using single proliferation markers (S-phase labeling or Ki-67), single markers do not appear to be reliable indicators of risk for colon neoplasia.

Although we found no difference in Ki-67 labeling percentage between the diagnostic groups of the colonoscopy survey, BrdU and Ki-67 labeling percentages of individual control subjects were better correlated than those of subjects with a history of colonic neoplasia (Table 1)Citation . This suggests greater synchrony between G1 duration and S-phase entry in the proliferating cells of the control subjects. Kohn et al. (1997)Citation did not find Ki-67 proliferation differences between colon cancer patients and controls but did find better correlation between retinoblastoma protein labeling and Ki-67 labeling in controls than in colon cancer patients. Because retinoblastoma protein is important for S-phase entry, their results are consistent with the BrdU and Ki-67 correlation differences found in our study. Differences in synchronous labeling in our colonoscopy survey subjects and in other studies (Kohn et al. 1997Citation , Shmakov et al. 1995Citation ) suggest that studies designed to detect disruption of cell cycle synchrony might help in understanding the disordered cellular physiology leading to colonic neoplasia or in detecting populations prone to colonic neoplasia.

The p52 labeling distributions in colonoscopy survey neoplasia subjects suggest a more basilar distribution than in the control subjects. Although no correlation was found between subject age and p52 expression in crypt compartments 2 and 3 in which the greatest difference between diagnostic groups occurred, p52 distribution does change in aging rats (Holt et al. 1995Citation ). Because p52 is not present in immature crypt base cells, cell differentiation and p52 formation may have occurred earlier in the neoplasia group. As with p52, greater expression of Lewis-Y antigen occurred in surface crypt compartments. However, crypt compartment distributions were similar for the two diagnostic groups, suggesting similar levels of apoptosis in both groups.

Because both BrdU and p52 labeling showed differences between diagnostic groups, their crypt compartment scores were used in a stepwise logistic regression procedure by SAS to predict the diagnostic group. The best prediction was achieved using only compartment 3 for BrdU. Considering this and the correlation patterns of BrdU and Ki-67, the most important labeling difference between the diagnostic groups of the colonoscopy survey was for the correlations of BrdU and Ki-67 labeling. Therefore it would be of interest to have further studies that simultaneously measure other cell cycle markers that assess differing portions of the cell cycle.

Acarbose trial.

Acarbose use caused significant changes in mucosal proliferation and SCFA. The positive correlation of butyrate with Ki-67 during acarbose use suggests a causal relationship between butyrate production and mucosal proliferation. Although acarbose simultaneously reduced propionate production there were no significant correlations between propionate and Ki-67 or BrdU labeling during acarbose use, suggesting that propionate reduction did not enhance proliferation.

The responses to acarbose occurred without dietary restrictions or starch supplementation throughout the 4-mo treatment period. Comparison of dietary records between the study periods showed only minor dietary carbohydrate differences between study periods so that acarbose use was the primary dietary intervention. The enhancement of butyrate values was comparable to that found in previous short-term studies (Scheppach et al. 1988Citation , Weaver et al. 1997Citation ). A study using higher doses of acarbose (300 mg three times per day) (Holt et al. 1996Citation ) showed lesser fecal butyrate differences, possibly because poorly absorbed acarbose may inhibit microbial (Weaver et al. 1997Citation ) as well as host amylases.

Positive butyrate and Ki-67 correlations with acarbose use contrast with the negative butyrate and Ki-67 correlations with placebo use (Table 1)Citation . The positive correlations might be explained by the more rapid or frequent transition of cells from early G1-phase to later G1-phase. Ki-67 does not label early G1 cells. The lack of butyrate and BrdU (S-phase labeling) correlation also suggests that butyrate’s effect occurs early in the cell cycle.

There were significantly more cells expressing Lewis-Y antigen in crypt compartments 2 and 3 with acarbose treatment than with placebo treatment. Earlier expression of Lewis-Y antigen suggests that the mucosal growth caused by acarbose may have been compensated in part by an enhanced commitment to apoptosis. p52 protein had similar distributions between the treatment periods. No clear associations between SCFA and Lewis-Y and p52 antigen distributions were found, suggesting that fermentation products were not closely associated with their expression.

Comparison of the colonoscopy survey and the acarbose trial.

Acarbose-treated subjects and control subjects of the colonoscopy survey showed relatively higher proliferation (assessed by BrdU labeling). The correlation of BrdU and Ki-67 labeling significantly improved with acarbose (Table 1)Citation , paralleling a better correlation of BrdU and Ki-67 labeling in control subjects of the colonoscopy survey (Table 1)Citation . These parallels suggest that augmentation of butyrate from acarbose created a more benign histologic milieu. These results and higher butyrate values in normal subjects compared with those with colonic neoplasia (Clausen et al. 1991Citation , Kashtan et al. 1992Citation , Weaver et al. 1988Citation ) offer a circumstantial linkage of butyrate and histologic change that may reflect reduced neoplasia risk. Improved cell cycle synchrony associated with butyrate suggests that butyrate optimizes cell cycle timing for the least probability of replication error.

We have made relative comparisons between the colonoscopy survey and the acarbose trial rather than direct comparisons of labeling percentages because biopsies from the colonoscopy survey were taken from an empty colon, whereas acarbose trial biopsies were from an unprepared colon. Although the agent used for bowel preparation was not thought to affect proliferation (Fireman et al. 1989Citation ), the effects of colonic fermentation seen in the acarbose trial make it reasonable to infer that biopsies taken from a colon empty of feces for a period of time would differ from those taken with colonic contents present. This colonic nutritional difference between studies may have been responsible for the poor correlation of BrdU and Ki-67 with placebo treatment in the acarbose trial compared with the neoplasia subjects of the colonoscopy survey. This implies that removal of nutrients for a limited time has a cell cycle synchronizing effect.

It is not surprising that butyrate, as a key colonocyte nutrient (Roediger 1980Citation ), stimulates mucosal proliferation. Higher rates of colonic mucosal proliferation occur in the proximal colon (Potten et al. 1992Citation ) where the highest concentrations of butyrate are found (Cummings et al. 1987Citation ). The more concentrated colonic mucosal proliferation with acarbose use has benign characteristics compared with our colonoscopy survey results and agrees with the in vitro stimulatory effects of butyrate on normal colonic mucosa (Bartram et al. 1993Citation , Scheppach et al. 1992Citation ) and with in vivo animal studies (Lupton and Kurtz 1993Citation , Sakata 1987Citation , Velázquez et al. 1996bCitation ). These findings, together with improved cell cycle synchrony associated with butyrate and epidemiologic data relating the negative correlation of colon cancer incidence by country with dietary starch intake by country (Cassidy et al. 1994Citation ), support a role for butyrate in prevention of colon cancer.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
The authors thank Theodore Peters, Jr., Meyer J. Wolin and Terry L. Miller for their many helpful suggestions.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Presented in part at the Scientific Session of the American Gastroenterological Association meeting, May 14, 1995, San Francisco, CA and at the Scientific Session of the Nutrition Society in Taipei, May 16, 1997, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. [Tangel, C., Stragand, J., Parfitt, M., Jenkins, P., Krause, J., Alpern, H., Davidson, R. & Weaver, G. (1995) Bromodeoxyuridine uptake and Ki-67 antigen in colonic biopsies of subjects with and without colonic neoplasia. Gastroenterology 108: A545 (abs.)], [Higgins, P., Tangel, C., Stragand, J., Parfitt, M., Jenkins, P. & Weaver, G. (1995) p52 protein in colonic biopsies of subjects with and without colonic neoplasia. Gastroenterology 108: A480 (abs.)]. Back

2 Supported by National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute grant CA56432, the Irving A. Hansen Memorial Foundation and Bayer Corporation. Back

Manuscript received May 30, 2000. Initial review completed June 21, 2000. Revision accepted August 9, 2000.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

1. Alberts D. S., Einspahr J., Rees-McGee S., Ramanujam P., Buller M. K., Clark L., Ritenbaugh C., Atwood J., Pethigal P., Earnest D., Villar H., Phelps J., Lipkin M., Wargovich M., Meyskens F. L., Jr Effects of dietary wheat bran fiber on rectal epithelial cell proliferation in patients with resection for colorectal cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1990;82:1280-1285[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Bartram H. P., Scheppach W., Schmid H., Hofmann A., Dusel G., Richter F., Richter A., Kasper H. Proliferation of human colonic mucosa as an intermediate biomarker of carcinogenesis: effects of butyrate, deoxycholate, calcium, ammonia, and pH. Cancer Res 1993;53:3283-3288[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Cassidy A., Bingham S. A., Cummings J. H. Starch intake and colorectal cancer risk: an international comparison. Br. J. Cancer 1994;69:937-942[Medline]

4. Chiasson J. L., Josse R. G., Hunt J. A., Palmason C., Rodger N. W., Ross S. A., Ryan E. A., Tan M. H., Wolever T. M. The efficacy of acarbose in the treatment of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. A multicenter controlled clinical trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 1994;121:928-935[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Clausen M. R., Bonnen H., Mortensen P. B. Colonic fermentation of dietary fibre to short chain fatty acids in patients with adenomatous polyps and colonic cancer. Gut 1991;32:923-928[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Cummings J. H., Pomare E. W., Branch W. J., Naylor C. P., MacFarlane G. T. Short chain fatty acids in human large intestine, portal hepatic and venous blood. Gut 1987;28:1221-1227[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Deschner E., Lewis C. M., Lipkin M. In vitro study of human rectal epithelial cells. I. Atypical zone of H3 thymidine incorporation in mucosa of multiple polyposis. J. Clin. Investig. 1963;42:1922-1928

8. Deschner E. E., Lipkin M. Proliferative patterns in colonic mucosa in familial polyposis. Cancer 1975;35:413-418[Medline]

9. Fireman Z., Rozen P., Fine N., Chetrit A. Reproducibility studies and effects of bowel preparations on measurements of rectal epithelial proliferation. Cancer Lett 1989;45:59-64[Medline]

10. Gerdes J., Lemke H., Wacker H. H., Schwab J., Stein H. Cell cycle analysis of a cell proliferation associated human nuclear antigen defined by the monoclonal antibody Ki67. J. Immunol. 1984;133:1710-1715[Abstract]

11. Hague A., Singh B., Paraskeva C. Butyrate acts as a survival factor for colonic epithelial cells: further fuel for the in vivo versus in vitro debate. Gastroenterology 1997;112:1036-1040[Medline]

12. Hassig C. A., Tong J. K., Schreiber S. L. Fiber-derived butyrate and the prevention of colon cancer. Chem. Biol. 1997;4:783-789[Medline]

13. Higgins P. J., Chaudhari P., Ryan M. P. Cell-shape regulation and matrix protein p52 content in phenotypic variants of ras-transformed rat kidney fibroblasts. Functional analysis and biochemical comparison of p52 with proteins implicated in cell-shape determination. Biochem. J. 1991;273:651-658

14. Higgins P. J., Tanaka Y. Cytoarchitectural response and expression of c-fos/p52 genes during enhancement of butyrate-initiated differentiation of human colon carcinoma cells by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 and its analogs. Lipkin M. Newmark H. I. Kelloff G. eds. Calcium, vitamin D, and Prevention of Colon Cancer 1991:305-326 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL.

15. Hiraishi K., Suzuki K., Hakomori S., Adachi M. LeY antigen expression is correlated with apoptosis (programmed cell death). Glycobiology 1993;3:381-390[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Holt P. R., Atillasoy E., Lindenbaum J., Ho S. B., Lupton J. R., McMahon D., Moss S. F. Effects of acarbose on fecal nutrients, colonic pH, and short-chain fatty acids and rectal proliferation indices. Metabolism 1996;45:1179-1187[Medline]

17. Holt P. R., Higgins P. J., Atillasoy E., Davis P. J., Lipkin M. Abnormal cell proliferation and p52/p35-CSK expression in the colons of aging rats. Exp. Gerontol. 1995;30:495-503[Medline]

18. Jass J. R. Diet, butyric acid and differentiation of gastrointestinal tract tumors. Med. Hypotheses 1985;18:113-118[Medline]

19. Jass J. R., Ajioka Y., Radojkovic M., Allison L. J., Lane M. R. Failure to detect colonic mucosal hyperproliferation in mutation positive members of a family with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer. Histopathology 1997;30:201-207[Medline]

20. Kashtan H., Stern H. S., Jenkins D.J.A., Jenkins A. L., Thompson L. U., Hay K., Marcon N., Minkin S., Bruce W. R. Colonic fermentation and markers of colorectal-cancer risk. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1992;55:723-728[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Kelloff G. J., Boone C. W., Steele V. E., Crowell J. A., Lubet R., Sigman C. C. Progress in cancer chemoprevention: perspectives on agent selection and short-term clinical intervention trials. Cancer Res 1994;54:2015s-2024s[Abstract/Free Full Text]

22. Kim Y. S., Taso D., Siddiqui B., Whitehead J. S., Arnstein P., Bennett J., Hicks J. Effects of sodium butyrate and dimethylsulfoxide on biochemical properties of human colon cancer cells. Cancer 1980;45:1185-1192[Medline]

23. Kohn G. J., Schwartz H. J., Ruebner B. H., Wong A. J., Lawson M. J. Colonic retinoblastoma protein and proliferation in cancer and non-cancer patients. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 1997;12:198-203[Medline]

24. Kruh J. Effects of sodium butyrate, a new pharmacological agent, on cells in culture. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 1982;42:65-82[Medline]

25. Lin P., Allison D. C. Measurement of DNA content and of tritiated thymidine and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation by the same cells. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1993;41:1435-1439[Abstract]

26. Lipkin M. Phase 1 and Phase 2 proliferative lesions of colonic epithelial cells in diseases leading to colonic cancer. Cancer 1974;34:878-888

27. Lipkin M., Blattner W. A., Fraumeni J.F.J., Lynch H. T., Deschner E., Winawer S. Tritiated thymidine (ph) labeling distribution as a marker for hereditary predisposition to colon cancer. Cancer Res 1983;43:1899-1904[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Lipkin M., Enker W. E., Winawer S. J. Tritiated-thymidine labeling of rectal epithelial cells in "non-prep" biopsies of individuals at increased risk for colonic neoplasia. Cancer Lett 1987;37:153-162[Medline]

29. Lipkin M., Newmark H. Effect of added dietary calcium on colonic epithelial cell proliferation in subjects at high risk for familial colonic cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 1985;313:1381-1384[Abstract]

30. Lupton J. R., Kurtz P. P. Relationship of colonic luminal short-chain fatty acids and pH to in vivo cell proliferation in rats. J. Nutr. 1993;123:1522-1530

31. Marra G., Anti M., Percesepe A., Armelao F., Ficarelli R., Coco C., Rinelli A., Vecchio F. M., D’Arcangelo E. Circadian variations of epithelial cell proliferation in human rectal crypts. Gastroenterology 1994;106:982-987[Medline]

32. Morita A., Tsao D., Kim Y. S. Effect of sodium butyrate on alkaline phosphatase in HRT-18, a human rectal cancer cell line. Cancer Res 1982;42:4540-4545[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Nakamura S., Goto J., Kitayama Y., Sheffield J. P., Talbot I. C. Flow cytometric analysis of DNA synthetic phase fraction of the normal appearing colonic mucosa in patients with colorectal neoplasms. Gut 1995;37:398-401[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Nsien E., Steinberg W. M., Wilkinson D. S., Rhame J. G., Henry J. P. Single-parameter DNA flow cytometric analysis of normal-appearing colonic mucosa does not predict the presence of colonic neoplasia. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1991;86:1477-1481[Medline]

35. Paganelli G. M., Biasco G., Santucci R., Brandi G., Lalli A. A., Miglioli M., Barbara L. Rectal cell proliferation and colorectal cancer risk level in patients with nonfamilial adenomatous polyps of the large bowel. Cancer 1991;68:2451-2454[Medline]

36. Paganelli G. M., Higgins P. J., Biasco G., Lipkin M., Brandi G., Santucci R., Miglioli M., Luigi B. Abnormal rectal cell proliferation and p52/p35 protein expression in patients with ulcerative colitis. Cancer Lett 1993;73:23-28[Medline]

37. Paspatis G. A., Zizi A., Chlouverakis G. J., Giannikaki E. S., Vasilakaki T., Elemenoglou I., Karamanolis D. G. Proliferative patterns of rectal mucosa as predictors of advanced colonic neoplasms in routinely processed rectal biopsies. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1998;93:1472-1477[Medline]

38. Potten C. S., Kellett M., Rew D. A., Roberts S. A. Proliferation in human gastrointestinal epithelium using bromodeoxyuridine in vivo: data for different sites, proximity to a tumour, and polyposis coli. Gut 1992;33:524-529[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Qin Y., Willems G. Comparison of the classical autoradiographic and the immunohistochemical methods with BrdU for measuring proliferation parameters in colon cancer. Anticancer Res 1993;13:731-735[Medline]

40. Risio M., Lipkin M., Candelaresi G. L., Bertion A., Coverlizza S., Rossini F. P. Correlations between rectal mucosa cell proliferation and the clinical and pathological features of nonfamilial neoplasia of the large intestine. Cancer Res 1991;51:1917-1921[Abstract/Free Full Text]

41. Roediger W.E.W. Role of anaerobic bacteria in the metabolic welfare of the colonic mucosa in man. Gut 1980;21:793-798[Abstract/Free Full Text]

42. Roediger W.E.W. Bacterial short-chain fatty acids and mucosal disease of the colon. Br. J. Surg. 1988;75:346-348[Medline]

43. Rozen P., Lubin F., Papo N., Zajicek G. Rectal epithelial proliferation in persons with or without a history of adenoma and its association with diet and lifestyle habits. Cancer 1998;83:1319-1327[Medline]

44. Sakata T. Stimulatory effect of short-chain fatty acids on epithelial cell proliferation in the rat intestine: a possible explanation for trophic effects of fermentable fibre, gut microbes and luminal trophic factors. Br. J. Nutr. 1987;58:95-103[Medline]

45. Sander E. G., Warner R. G., Harrison H. N., Lossli J. K. The stimulatory effect of sodium butyrate and sodium propionate on the development of rumen mucosa in the young calf. J. Dairy Sci. 1959;42:1600-1605[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Sasaki K., Murakami T., Kawasaki M., Takahashi M. The cell cycle associated change of the Ki-67 reactive nuclear antigen expression. J. Cell. Physiol. 1987;133:579-584[Medline]

47. Scheppach W., Bartram H. P., Richter F. Role of short-chain fatty acids in the prevention of colorectal cancer. Eur. J. Cancer 1995;31A:1077-1080

48. Scheppach W., Bartram P., Richter A., Richter F., Liepold H., Dusel G., Hofstetter G., Ruthlein J., Kasper H. Effect of short-chain fatty acids on the human colonic mucosa in vitro. J. Parent. Enteral Nutr. 1992;16:43-48[Abstract/Free Full Text]

49. Scheppach W., Fabian M., Sach M., Kasper H. J. The effect of starch malabsorption on fecal short chain acid excretion in man. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 1988;23:755-759[Medline]

50. Shmakov A. N., Morey A. L., Ferguson D.J.P., Fleming K. A., O’Brien J. A., Savidge T. C. Conventional patterns of human intestinal proliferation in a severe-combined immunodeficient xenograft model. Differentiation 1995;59:321-330[Medline]

51. Terpstra O. T., van Blankenstein M., Dees J., Eilers G.A.M. Abnormal pattern of cell proliferation in the entire colonic mucosa of patients with colon adenoma or cancer. Gastroenterology 1987;92:704-708[Medline]

52. Tsao D., Morita A., Bella A., Jr, Luu P., Kim Y. S. Differential effects of sodium butyrate, dimethyl sulfoxide, and retinoic acid on membrane-associated antigen, enzymes, and glycoproteins of human rectal adenocarcinoma cells. Cancer Res 1982;42:1052-1057[Abstract/Free Full Text]

53. Velázquez O. C., Lederer H. M., Rombeau J. L. Butyrate and the colonocyte, implications for neoplasia. Dig. Dis. Sci. 1996a;41:727-739[Medline]

54. Velázquez O. C., Zhou D., Seto R. W., Jabbar A., Choi J., Lederer H. M., Rombeau J. L. In vivo crypt surface hyperproliferation is decreased by butyrate and increased by deoxycholate in normal rat colon: associated in vivo effects on c-Fos and cJun expression. J. Parent. Enteral Nutr. 1996b;20:243-250[Abstract/Free Full Text]

55. Weaver G. A., Krause J. A., Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Incidence of methanogenic bacteria in a sigmoidoscopy population: an association of methanogenic bacteria and diverticulosis. Gut 1986;27:698-704[Abstract/Free Full Text]

56. Weaver G. A., Krause J. A., Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Short chain fatty acid distributions of enema samples from a sigmoidoscopy population: an association of high acetate and low butyrate ratios with adenomatous polyps and colon cancer. Gut 1988;29:1539-1543[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Weaver G. A., Krause J. A., Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Corn starch fermentation by the colonic microbial community yields more butyrate than cabbage fiber fermentation: corn starch fermentation rates correlate negatively with methanogenesis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1992;55:70-77[Abstract/Free Full Text]

58. Weaver G. A., Tangel C. T., Krause J. A., Parfitt M. M., Jenkins P. L., Rader J. M., Lewis B. A., Miller T. L., Wolin M. J. Acarbose enhances human colonic butyrate production. J. Nutr. 1997;127:717-723[Abstract/Free Full Text]

59. Whitehead R. H., Young G. P., Bhathal P. S. Effects of short chain fatty acids on a new human colon carcinoma cell line (LIM 1215). Gut 1986;27:1457-1463[Abstract/Free Full Text]

60. Wong A. J., Kohn G. J., Schwartz H. J., Ruebner B. H., Lawson M. J. Colorectal cancer and noncancer patients have similar labeling indices by microscopy and computed image analysis. Hum. Pathol. 1995;26:1329-1332[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
N. J. Emenaker, G. M. Calaf, D. Cox, M. D. Basson, and N. Qureshi
Short-Chain Fatty Acids Inhibit Invasive Human Colon Cancer by Modulating uPA, TIMP-1, TIMP-2, Mutant p53, Bcl-2, Bax, p21 and PCNA Protein Expression in an In Vitro Cell Culture Model
J. Nutr., November 1, 2001; 131(11): 3041S - 3046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, P. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Higgins, P. J.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2000 by American Society for Nutrition