Journal of Nutrition EB Program 2010 Early Registration

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Etherton, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Etherton, T. D.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2000;130:2623-2625.)
© 2000 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Articles

The Biology of Somatotropin in Adipose Tissue Growth and Nutrient Partitioning1

Terry D. Etherton

Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Somatotropin and Growth.
 Effects of Somatotropin on...
 REFERENCES
 
During the past 20 years, much has been learned about how porcine somatotropin (pST) affects growth and nutrient partitioning in growing pigs. The development of techniques to produce large quantities of recombinantly derived pST enabled numerous long-term studies to be conducted in which the effects of daily pST administration could be evaluated. Collectively, these studies established that treatment of growing pigs with pST markedly stimulated muscle growth and, concurrently, reduced fat deposition. In growing pigs, maximally effective doses of pST increase average daily gain as much as 10–20%, improve feed efficiency 15–30%, decrease adipose tissue mass and lipid accretion rates by as much as 50–80% and concurrently increase protein deposition by 50%. These effects are associated with a decrease in feed intake of ~10–15%. These responses occur because pST has a wide array of biological effects that modulate nutrient partitioning between adipose tissue and skeletal muscle. The decrease in adipose tissue growth is due to a reduction in lipogenesis that is the consequence of pST blunting the effects of many insulin-dependent events. With respect to fatty acid synthase (FAS), a pace-setting enzyme in the lipogenic pathway, enzyme activity is markedly reduced by pST. This is the result of a pST-mediated decrease in FAS mRNA levels that occurs because FAS gene transcription is decreased. The consequence of the decrease in lipid synthesis is that adipocyte hypertrophy is impaired and, hence, tissue growth. This review will provide an overview of some of the biological effects of pST in adipose tissue and will discuss what is known about the underlying mechanisms that account for these effects.


KEY WORDS:


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Somatotropin and Growth.
 Effects of Somatotropin on...
 REFERENCES
 
Duringthe past 20 years, much has been learned about how porcine somatotropin (pST)2 increases the growth of pigs and the underlying biological mechanisms. These advances were facilitated by the development of methods to produce recombinantly derived pST on a large scale. The availability of large quantities of recombinant pST enabled landmark studies to be conducted that evaluated how administration of pST affected muscle and adipose tissue growth. Administration of pST to growing pigs can increase muscle growth by as much as 50% and concurrently decrease adipose tissue accretion (maximal effect ~70%). The remarkable effects of pST are due to an impressive array of biological effects of the hormone on nutrient utilization, nutrient partitioning and the underlying biological processes that regulate and coordinate these metabolic events in a variety of tissues. One of the hallmark metabolic effects of pST in adipose tissue is that it decreases lipid synthesis and compromises many of the effects of insulin (1Citation 2Citation 3)Citation . Several excellent in-depth reviews have been written about the biological effects of pST on growth and nutrient partitioning and how insulin action is compromised in the pig. Consequently, this review provides an overview of the major findings relative to growth and adipose tissue metabolism; the reader is referred to more extensive reviews for in-depth information about the efficacy of pST and what is known about the biological mechanisms that mediate the effects of the hormone (1Citation 2Citation 3)Citation .


    Somatotropin and Growth.
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Somatotropin and Growth.
 Effects of Somatotropin on...
 REFERENCES
 
Somatotropin (ST) has impressive effects on growth and nutrient partitioning between muscle and adipose tissue. The extent to which this occurs is illustrated by studies in which maximally effective doses of pST [~100 µg/(kg body·d)] have been administered to growing pigs (for 30–77 d). These studies demonstrated that the average daily gain is increased ~10–20%, feed efficiency (feed consumed/body weight gain) is improved 13-33% and protein deposition (muscle growth) is increased by as much as 62% (reviewed in 2Citation ,4Citation ). The anabolic effects of pST in muscle contrast with the precipitous decrease that occurs in adipose tissue growth. As shown in Table 1Citation , lipid accretion rates are decreased by as much as 70%. Similar effects of human ST administration were observed in growing children (prepubertal boys) after treatment for 6 mo, albeit the effects were smaller (10% reduction in body fat), likely because of the dose administered (5)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Representative effects of porcine somatotropin (pST) on lipid accretion in pigs

 
It is important to appreciate that adipose tissue growth in pigs is highly dependent on lipogenic rate and that glucose is the primary carbon source. Isotope kinetic studies have shown that >40% of whole-body glucose turnover can be used by adipose tissue for de novo lipogenesis in 80-kg pigs (6)Citation . Thus, any metabolic modifier such as pST, which decreases glucose uptake by adipose tissue, creates a physiologic state in which the tissue is deprived of the primary substrate necessary for lipid accretion. This metabolic adaptation is important for the following reasons: 1) it results in a decrease in the rate of adipocyte hypertrophy and, hence, the rate of adipose tissue accretion; and 2) it accounts for the effects that pST has on productive efficiency and contributes to the increase in muscle growth. In concert with the dramatic shifts in adipose tissue glucose metabolism, glucose that is normally used for lipogenesis is redirected to other tissues, primarily muscle.


    Effects of Somatotropin on Adipose Tissue Growth.
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Somatotropin and Growth.
 Effects of Somatotropin on...
 REFERENCES
 
Lipogenesis. The range of biological effects of pST are extraordinary and have been discussed previously (2)Citation . Somatotropin orchestrates many diverse physiologic processes so that more nutrients can be used for lean tissue accretion, and fewer, primarily glucose, are used by adipose tissue. Because the majority (~80%) of lipid in the body is derived from de novo fatty acid synthesis (7)Citation and adipose tissue is the major site of fatty acid synthesis in pigs (7Citation ,8)Citation , early studies focused on establishing whether the effects of pST were the result of changes in lipogenesis. On the basis of in vitro (9Citation 10Citation 11)Citation and in vivo kinetic studies (6)Citation , pST administration dramatically reduces fatty acid synthesis in adipose tissue. In growing pigs, rates of de novo synthesis can be decreased by >90%, whereas effects on rates of lipolysis are minimal (2Citation ,12)Citation . The effects of pST on lipogenesis appear to be a direct action of pST because essentially all effects that occur with in vivo pST treatment can be mimicked when adipose tissue explants are cultured chronically with pST (13)Citation . In addition, administration of insulin-like growth factor I daily for 28 d to pigs does not mimic the effects of pST administration on carcass composition (14)Citation .

One mechanism by which pST alters nutrient partitioning is to modulate tissue responsiveness to insulin. In adipose tissue, this involves a decrease in sensitivity with no change in the maximum response (13Citation ,15)Citation . The reduction in insulin sensitivity decreases insulin-regulated events such as glucose transport, lipogenic enzyme activities, expression of lipogenic enzyme genes and lipogenesis (reviewed in 2Citation ). Moreover, pST treatment reduces whole-body glucose response when insulin tolerance tests are conducted (16)Citation . This effect of pST is frequently referred to as insulin resistance; this is somewhat misleading, however, because the effect is clearly tissue specific and relates only to certain insulin-responsive processes. Kinetic studies have demonstrated that the alteration in glucose response to insulin is almost exclusively related to effects on lipogenesis in adipose tissue (11)Citation ; insulin sensitivity of skeletal muscle is relatively unaffected (2Citation ,17)Citation . The consequence of tissue-specific control of insulin action is a remarkable shift in nutrient partitioning such that much of the glucose destined for lipid synthesis in adipose tissue is redirected to muscle. This adaptation is important because the additional glucose diverted to muscle appears to play a critical role in providing additional energy to support the increase in muscle protein synthesis observed in pigs treated with pST.

The decrease in insulin sensitivity caused by pST in pig adipose tissue is not associated with any change in insulin receptor number or tyrosine kinase activity of the insulin receptor (18)Citation . This is consistent with the fact that some effects of insulin in the adipocyte are not diminished by ST treatment (e.g., insulin inhibition of lipolysis; see 2Citation ). Little is known, however, about the postreceptor events that mediate the effects of pST on the insulin signal pathway(s) to antagonize the stimulatory effect of insulin on expression of lipogenic enzyme genes. For this reason, studies have been undertaken to use FAS as a model to learn more about how ST regulates FAS enzyme activity and gene transcription. An important rationale for selecting FAS as a model to study was based on the observations that pST markedly reduces FAS enzyme activity (see Table 2Citation ) and that enzyme activity and FAS gene expression are exquisitely sensitive to insulin (i.e., insulin increases enzyme activity and gene expression). In addition, the FAS gene is useful to study because changes in enzyme activity are the result of changes in enzyme protein mass that reflect changes in FAS mRNA abundance (reviewed in 19Citation ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of porcine somatotropin (pST) on various lipogenic enzyme activities in pig adipose tissue1

 
On the basis of the evidence that pST decreases FAS enzyme activity (18Citation ,20)Citation and the fact that changes in enzyme protein levels reflect changes in FAS protein abundance, it is not surprising that treatment of growing pigs with pST dramatically decreases adipose tissue FAS mRNA levels (21)Citation . In addition, in both rat liver and cultured 3T3-F442A adipocytes, ST reduces FAS mRNA abundance and the ability of insulin to increase mRNA, effects that are the result of a decrease in gene transcription (22Citation ,23)Citation . Somatotropin also shortens the half-life of FAS mRNA from 35 to 11 h (23)Citation . Thus, ST reduces FAS mRNA abundance both at the transcriptional level as well as by destabilizing FAS mRNA.

Little is known about how ST affects the insulin signal pathways that blunt the stimulatory effects of insulin on FAS gene expression. Clearly, the effect has to be postreceptor because insulin binding is unaffected. With respect to how ST might interfere with insulin signaling at the distal end of the signal pathway (i.e., at the level of FAS gene transcription), it is probable that this reflects the presence of a somatotropin response element that acts as a negative control element or that ST affects the abundance or binding of a trans-acting factor(s) that interacts with the insulin response element (IRE) in the FAS gene in a way that blunts insulin regulation.

Relative to the latter hypothesis, there is an IRE located in the proximal region (from -71 to -50) of the FAS promoter that appears to mediate the stimulatory effect of insulin on FAS gene transcription (24)Citation . In this IRE, there is an E-box DNA binding motif (5'-CANNTG-3') for basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factors such as upstream stimulatory factors (USF); both USF1 and USF2 have been shown to bind to this site (25)Citation . A study reported that USF binding to the E-box at -65 was required for insulin regulation of the FAS promoter (26)Citation . However, it is uncertain whether USF1 mediates the insulin antagonistic effect of ST on FAS gene expression. Studies we have conducted (Yin, D., and Etherton, T. D., unpublished data) demonstrated that neither insulin nor ST affect the abundance of USF1 or binding of USF1 to the FAS-IRE in vitro in 3T3-F442A adipocytes. Thus, our findings indicate that USF1 is not involved in mediating the effects of insulin and ST on the regulation of FAS gene transcription, suggesting that other mechanisms exist. The nature of these mechanisms is not clear and much work remains to be done to clarify how pST decreases FAS gene transcription.

Lipolysis.

In pigs, the predominant effect of pST on adipose tissue growth is the result of changes in lipogenesis; lipolysis is relatively unaffected (2Citation ,12)Citation . The conclusion that lipolysis not affected by pST was definitively established by Dunshea et al. (12)Citation . These investigators quantified glycerol and nonessential fatty acid kinetics using a primed, continuous infusion of [2-3H]glycerol and [9,10(n)-3H]oleic acid in pigs treated with 120 µg pST/(kg body · d) for 8 d. Kinetics were examined under both basal conditions and during a hyperinsulinemic/euglycemic clamp. Although indices of fat mobilization tended to be higher in pigs treated with pST, the magnitude of the increases was small and would be sufficient to account for only a minor fraction of the decreased lipid accretion observed in pST-treated pigs.

The evidence to date clearly indicates that pST has potent effects on a number of key metabolic events that control adipose tissue growth. The mechanisms by which pST affects nutrient utilization in adipose tissue involve tissue-specific changes in key metabolic pathways as well as alterations in tissue responsiveness to insulin. In many cases, the cellular sites of the alterations in metabolic pathways and signal transduction have been identified, and it is clear that the biological effects of pST are dependent upon multiple changes. This metabolic regulation occurs in an orchestrated manner that results in the redirection of glucose away from lipid synthesis to muscle to provide additional ATP to support the increase in muscle protein deposition that occurs. The consequence of a decrease in lipid synthesis is that adipose tissue growth is dramatically reduced. At the gene level, we have much to learn about how pST blunts the effects of insulin on FAS gene transcription. The diverse spectrum of effects of pST in a variety of tissues as well as in a specific tissue reinforces the fact that multiple intracellular signaling events likely mediate the effects of the hormone. The nature of these signal pathways is obscure; with respect to adipose tissue, much remains to be unraveled about the mechanisms that account for the precipitous decrease in tissue growth. Nonetheless, it is evident that pST plays a key role in regulating adipose tissue metabolism. As we learn more about the mechanisms by which pST blunts adipose tissue growth, it is not unreasonable to speculate that we may discover innovative strategies that can be implemented clinically for the prevention and treatment of human obesity. The large body of evidence from studies conducted with growing pigs treated with pST provides compelling support for the idea that with respect to adipose tissue, ST is not a "growth" hormone; rather, it is a potent metabolic hormone that has remarkable antiobesity effects.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Manuscript received 9 May 2000. Back

2 Abbreviations used: FAS, fatty acid synthase; IRE, insulin response element; pST, porcine somatotropin; ST, somatotropin; USF, upstream stimulatory factor. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Somatotropin and Growth.
 Effects of Somatotropin on...
 REFERENCES
 

1. Boyd R. D., Bauman D. E. Mechanisms of action for somatotropin in growth. Campion D. R. Hausman G. J. Martin R. J. eds. Current Concepts of Animal Growth Regulation 1989:257-293 Plenum New York

2. Etherton T. D., Bauman D. E. Biology of somatotropin in growth and lactation of domestic animals. Physiol. Rev. 1998;78:745-761[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Bell A. W., Bauman D. E., Beermann D. H., Harrell R. J. Nutrition, development and efficacy of growth promoters in livestock species. J. Nutr. 1998;128(suppl. 2):360S-363S

4. Etherton T. D., Louveau I. Manipulation of adiposity by somatotropin and beta-adrenergic agonists: a comparison of their mechanisms of action. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1992;51:419-431[Medline]

5. Kamel A., Norgren S., Elimam A., Danielsson P., Marcus C. Effects of growth hormone treatment in obese prepubertal boys. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2000;85:1412-1419[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Dunshea F. R., Harris D. M., Bauman D. E., Boyd R. D., Bell A. W. Effect of porcine somatotropin on in vivo glucose kinetics and lipogenesis in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 1992;70:141-151[Abstract]

7. O’Hea E. K., Leville G. A. Significance of adipose tissue and liver as sites of fatty acid synthesis in the pig and the efficiency of utilization of various substrates for lipogenesis. J. Nutr. 1969;99:338-344

8. Bauman D. E. Intermediary metabolism of adipose tissue. Fed. Proc 1976;35:2308-2313[Medline]

9. Walton P. E., Etherton T. D. Stimulation of lipogenesis by insulin in swine adipose tissue: antagonism by porcine growth hormone. J. Anim. Sci. 1986;62:1584-1595

10. Walton P. E., Etherton T. D., Chung C. S. Exogenous pituitary and recombinant growth hormones induce insulin and insulin-like growth factor I resistance in pig adipose tissue. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol. 1987;4:183-189[Medline]

11. Walton P. E., Etherton T. D., Evock C. M. Antagonism of insulin action in cultured pig adipose tissue by pituitary and recombinant porcine growth hormone: potentiation by hydrocortisone. Endocrinology 1986;118:2577-2581[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Dunshea F. R., Harris D. M., Bauman D. E., Boyd R. D., Bell A. W. Effect of somatotropin on nonesterified fatty acid and glycerol metabolism in growing pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 1992;70:132-140[Abstract]

13. Etherton T. D., Louveau I., Sørensen M. T., Chaudhuri S. Mechanisms by which somatotropin decreases adipose tissue growth. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1993;58(suppl.):287S-295S[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Klindt J., Yen J. T., Buonomo F. C., Wise T. Growth, body composition, and endocrine responses to chronic administration of insulin-like growth factor I and(or) porcine growth hormone in pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 1998;76:2368-2381[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Etherton T. D., Smith S. B. Somatotropin and ß-adrenergic agonists: their efficacy and mechanisms of action. J. Anim. Sci. 1991;69(suppl. 2):2-26[Free Full Text]

16. Gopinath R., Etherton T. D. Effects of porcine growth hormone on glucose metabolism of pigs: II. Glucose tolerance, peripheral tissue insulin sensitivity and glucose kinetics. J. Anim. Sci. 1989;67:689-697

17. Wray-Cahen D., Bell A. W., Boyd R. D., Ross A., Bauman D. E., Krick B. J., Harrell R. J. Nutrient uptake by the hindlimb of growing pigs treated with porcine somatotropin and insulin. J. Nutr. 1995;125:125-135

18. Magri K. A., Adamo M., Leroith D., Etherton T. D. The inhibition of insulin action and glucose metabolism by porcine growth hormone in porcine adipocytes is not the result of any decrease in insulin binding or insulin receptor kinase activity. Biochem. J. 1990;266:107-113[Medline]

19. Hillgartner F. B., Salati L. M., Goodridge A. G. Physiological and molecular mechanisms involved in nutritional regulation of fatty acid synthesis. Physiol. Rev. 1995;75:47-76[Free Full Text]

20. Harris D. M., Dunshea F. R., Bauman D. E., Boyd R. D., Wang S. Y., Johnson P. A., Clarke S. D. Effect of in vivo somatotropin treatment of growing pigs on adipose tissue lipogenesis. J. Anim. Sci. 1993;71:3293-3300[Abstract]

21. Donkin S. S., Chiu P. Y., Yin D., Louveau I., Swencki B., Vockroth J., Evock-Clover C. M., Peters J. L., Etherton T. D. Porcine somatotropin differentially down-regulates expression of the GLUT4 and fatty acid synthase genes in pig adipose tissue. J. Nutr. 1996;126:2568-2577

22. Donkin S. S., McNall A. D., Swencki B., Peters J. L., Etherton T. D. The growth hormone-dependent decrease in hepatic fatty acid synthase mRNA is the result of a decrease in gene transcription. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 1996;16:151-158[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Yin D., Clarke S. D., Peters J. L., Etherton T. D. Somatotropin-dependent decrease in fatty acid synthase mRNA abundance in 3T3-F442A adipocytes is the result of a decrease in gene transcription and mRNA stability. Biochem. J. 1998;331:815-820

24. Moustaid N., Beyer R. S., Sul H. S. Identification of an insulin response element in the fatty acid synthase promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:5629-5634[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Wang D., Sul H. S. Upstream stimulatory factors bind to insulin response sequence of the fatty acid synthase promoter. USF1 is regulated. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:28716-28722[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Wang D., Sul H. S. Upstream stimulatory factor binding to the E-box at -65 is required for insulin regulation of the fatty acid synthase promoter. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:26367-26374[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Evock C. M., Etherton T. D., Chung C. S., Ivy R. E. Pituitary porcine growth hormone (pGH) and a recombinant pGH analog stimulate pig growth performance in a similar manner. J. Anim. Sci. 1988;66:1928-1194

28. Liu C. Y., Grant A. L., Kim K. H., Mills S. E. Porcine somatotropin decreases acetyl-CoA carboxylase gene expression in porcine adipose tissue. Dom. Anim. Endocrinol. 1994;11:125-132[Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. M. Wallace, M. Matsuzaki, J. Milne, and R. Aitken
Late but Not Early Gestational Maternal Growth Hormone Treatment Increases Fetal Adiposity in Overnourished Adolescent Sheep
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2006; 75(2): 231 - 239.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
E. J. Murphy
Stable isotope methods for the in vivo measurement of lipogenesis and triglyceride metabolism
J Anim Sci, April 1, 2006; 84(13_suppl): E94 - E.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. T. Yen, J. Klindt, B. J. Kerr, and F. C. Buonomo
Lysine requirement of finishing pigs administered porcine somatotropin by sustained-release implant
J Anim Sci, December 1, 2005; 83(12): 2789 - 2797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. M. Wallace, R. P. Aitken, J. S. Milne, and W. W. Hay Jr.
Nutritionally Mediated Placental Growth Restriction in the Growing Adolescent: Consequences for the Fetus
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2004; 71(4): 1055 - 1062.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. M. Wallace, J. S. Milne, and R. P. Aitken
Maternal Growth Hormone Treatment from Day 35 to 80 of Gestation Alters Nutrient Partitioning in Favor of Uteroplacental Growth in the Overnourished Adolescent Sheep
Biol Reprod, May 1, 2004; 70(5): 1277 - 1285.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
J. Novakofski
Adipogenesis: Usefulness of in vitro and in vivo experimental models
J Anim Sci, March 1, 2004; 82(3): 905 - 915.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J ANIM SCIHome page
T. D. Etherton
Somatotropic function: The somatomedin hypothesis revisited
J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E239 - 244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
F. Frick, D. Linden, C. Ameen, S. Eden, A. Mode, and J. Oscarsson
Interaction between growth hormone and insulin in the regulation of lipoprotein metabolism in the rat
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, November 1, 2002; 283(5): E1023 - E1031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
R. A. French, S. R. Broussard, W. A. Meier, C. Minshall, S. Arkins, J. F. Zachary, R. Dantzer, and K. W. Kelley
Age-Associated Loss of Bone Marrow Hematopoietic Cells Is Reversed by GH and Accompanies Thymic Reconstitution
Endocrinology, February 1, 2002; 143(2): 690 - 699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Etherton, T. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Etherton, T. D.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2000 by American Society for Nutrition