Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marciani, L.
Right arrow Articles by Fillery-Travis, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marciani, L.
Right arrow Articles by Fillery-Travis, A. J.
(Journal of Nutrition. 2000;130:122-127.)
© 2000 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Article

Gastric Response to Increased Meal Viscosity Assessed by Echo-Planar Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Humans1 ,2

Luca Marciani, Penny A. Gowland, Robin C. Spiller*3, Pretima Manoj{dagger}, Rachel J. Moore, Paul Young, Shireen Al-Sahab, Debbie Bush**, Jeff Wright** and Annette J. Fillery-Travis{dagger}

Magnetic Resonance Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK; * Division of Gastroenterology and ** Department of Surgery, Queen’s Medical Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; and {dagger} Institute of Food Research, Colney, Norwich NR4 7UA, UK

3To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Normal meals are highly viscous, and viscosity is a key factor in influencing gastric emptying of food. However, the process of meal dilution and mixing is difficult to assess with the use of conventional methods. The aim of this study was to validate an in vivo, novel, noninvasive, echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging (EPI) technique, capable of monitoring the viscosity of a model meal, and to use this to investigate the effects of viscosity on gastric emptying, meal dilution and satiety. Healthy volunteers (n = 8) ingested 500 mL of locust bean gum (0.25, 0.5, 1.0 or 1.5 g/100 g), nonnutrient, liquid meals of varying viscosities, and labeled with a nonabsorbable marker, phenol red. Meal viscosity was calibrated against the water proton transverse relaxation rate (T2-1) in vitro before ingestion, thus viscosity was measured in vivo via EPI measurements of T2-1. Viscosity and dilution were also measured directly using nasogastric aspirates. Gastric volumes as measured by EPI, fullness, appetite and hunger were also assessed serially. Before ingestion, the log of initial meal viscosity was linearly related to T2-1 (n = 8, r2 = 0.95). Similarly, T2-1 measured in vivo was also linearly related to the viscosity of the aspirates (r2 = 0.88). All meals underwent rapid dilution, leading to a reduction in viscosity, which was greatest for the most viscous meal (P < 0.01). Surprisingly, despite the fact that the initial meal viscosity varied 1000-fold, there was only a small delay in gastric emptying (P for trend < 0.05). The area under the curve for satiety increased with initial meal viscosity, whereas that for hunger decreased (P < 0.05). In conclusion, the viscosity of a meal in vivo can be measured noninvasively using EPI. The stomach responds to meal ingestion by rapid intragastric dilution, causing a reduction of meal viscosity, and gastric emptying is minimally delayed. However, increased viscosity is associated with more prolonged satiety.


KEY WORDS: • meal viscosity • gastric emptying • satiety • humans • echo-planar imaging


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
It has been proposed that slowing gastric emptying by means of increasing meal viscosity might slow digestion and absorption of nutrients, thus improving the management of glucose intolerance and obesity (Blackburn et al. 1984Citation , Haskell et al. 1992Citation , Zavoral et al. 1983Citation ). Several animal studies have shown that meal viscosity influences gastric motor function, although the techniques used have involved invasive surgery, and it is not clear that the results can be applied directly to humans under normal conditions (Cherbut et al. 1990Citation , Prove and Ehrlein 1982Citation ). Human studies suggest that high viscosity meals are more satisfying (Bergmann et al. 1992Citation , Di Lorenzo et al. 1988Citation ), and increasing viscosity may slow gastric emptying (Krotkiewski 1984Citation , Sandhu et al. 1987Citation , Wilmshurst and Crawley 1980Citation ). Testing this hypothesis in humans is difficult without a technique with which to measure intragastric volumes and viscosity. Scintigraphic emptying studies (Chaudhury 1974Citation ) have limited image resolution and cannot be repeated frequently because of the associated radiation dose. Furthermore, scintigraphic studies provide information only about the amount of meal remaining in the stomach, rather than the total gastric volume including secretions, which is likely to be the critical determinant of satiety. Ultrasonographic techniques are limited to views of the antrum because assessment of the whole gastric volume is difficult due to air/fluid interfaces, which disrupt the ultrasound beam. Recently, echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging (EPI)4 has been used extensively to study gastric emptying (Evans et al. 1993Citation , Schwizer et al. 1992Citation and 1994Citation , Stehling et al. 1989Citation ), motility (Issa et al. 1994Citation , Schwizer et al. 1996Citation ) and flow (Boulby et al. 1999Citation ) in the gastric lumen and to obtain three-dimensional images of the intragastric distribution of water-containing meals (Wright et al. 1996Citation ). EPI is an ultrahigh speed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Mansfield 1977Citation ) technique, which can effectively freeze gastric motility; thus it can overcome abdominal motion artifacts by acquiring images in 130 ms. Assessing the dynamic changes in intragastric meal viscosity using nasogastric intubation and aspiration is difficult and may modify normal gastric behavior. It would therefore be of great value to be able to use EPI to assess the viscosity of gastric contents in vivo, serially and noninvasively, and to relate this to gastrointestinal motor function.

We have recently validated a method of measuring the viscosity of a galactomannan model meal in vitro using EPI (Marciani et al. 1998Citation ). In locust bean gum (LBG) water solutions, the nuclear spin-spin relaxation process (characterized by the relaxation rate, T2-1) is dominated by the fast exchange between the hydroxyl protons on polysaccharide coils and bulk water (Hills et al. 1991Citation ). Increasing LBG concentration increases the polysaccharide entanglement, affecting both the viscosity and the T2-1 of the solution and making it possible to calibrate the viscosity of the solution against its T2-1. The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and rheological properties of LBG solutions have also been shown to be independent of exposure to the intragastric environment (Marciani et al. 1998Citation ). These characteristics make LBG solutions ideal for carrying out viscosity measurements in vivo by MRI, provided that an ultrafast imaging technique is used to overcome gastrointestinal motion.

The first aim of this study was therefore to evaluate the applicability of this novel technique in vivo, by comparing the values of meal viscosity measured by EPI relaxometry within the gastric lumen with the viscosity of retrieved digesta samples measured using a standard viscometer. The second aim was to evaluate the changes in meal viscosity during gastric emptying and correlate them with both meal dilution and the subjective feelings of satiety in normal volunteers.


    SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Volunteers and study design.

LBG (Ceratonia siliqua, food grade, Lucas Meyer Colloids, Chester, UK) water solutions (0.25, 0.5, 1 and 1.5 g/100 g) were prepared by adding appropriate amounts of powder and 34 µg phenol red (BDH, Poole, UK) to 800 mL hot water. The solutions were blended using a food mixer and kept at 90°C for 1 h before being allowed to cool down slowly overnight to 37°C. The solutions were found to be homogeneous and stable in terms of relaxation times and viscosity for at least 17 h after preparation. Phenol red is a nonabsorbable marker, which allows meal dilution to be measured by spectrophotometry (Hobsley and Silen 1969Citation ).

Healthy volunteers (n = 8), age 18–30 y, 3 men and 5 women, who were free from serious disease, had no history of gastrointestinal disorders and were within ±25% of ideal body weight for their height, attended on four separate experimental morning sessions (>1 d and <7 d apart) after fasting overnight on each occasion. They were intubated with a nasogastric tube (i.d., 4 mm), which was positioned so that its tip was lying on the greater curvature of the stomach with the subject in the left lateral position. Water (50 mL) was then instilled and the positioning of the nasogastric tube within the gastric lumen was verified by recovering at least 45 mL of gastric aspirate (checked using Litmus paper). After this procedure, each volunteer drank 500 mL of one of the four LBG meals, which had been prepared as described above. The time when meal ingestion started was defined as t = 0 min. Meals were given according to a Latin-square randomization design to avoid order effects. This protocol was approved by the University Medical School Ethics Committee, and volunteers gave informed written consent before experiments.

Echo-planar imaging.

Single-shot EPI (Howseman et al. 1988Citation ) images were acquired on a whole-body 0.5 T purpose-built EPI scanner equipped with actively shielded gradients and a 50-cm diameter bird-cage coil. The in-plane resolution was 4.3 mm x 2.6 mm; a slice thickness of 1 cm was used throughout the experiments. Each image was acquired in 130 ms using a 128 x 128 matrix with an effective echo time of 40 ms. Initially, T2 data sets were acquired for each meal in vitro at 37°C by using a spin-echo EPI sequence with eight echo times varying from 60 to 960 ms repeated once. The repetition time was 10 s with a total acquisition time of 2.7 min. After ingestion, a transverse rapid multislice set of EPI images of the subject was acquired from the heart to the kidneys to determine the position and volume of the gastric lumen. The spin-echo EPI sequence was then used to acquire in vivo T2 data. Volume and T2 data sets were acquired every 12 min until the stomach appeared empty. Volunteers were asked to hold their breath before each image acquisition to minimize diaphragmatic displacement. In between scanning, volunteers were asked to sit upright on the scanning bed, lying down only for the time necessary to acquire the images. The time taken to drink the most viscous meal was longer than that required to ingest the least viscous one; thus the acquisition of the first set of images was standardized to be 12 min after the beginning of ingestion for all meals.

Rheology measurements.

Viscosity measurements were conducted at 37°C using a CSR10 (Bohlin Instruments, Cirencester, UK) temperature-controlled rheometer. Samples (20 mL) of the test meal were obtained before ingestion, immediately after ingestion and 40 min after ingestion with the use of the nasogastric tube. These samples underwent stress viscometry measurements with the use of a concentric cylinder geometry probe. Stress viscometry profiles were acquired for 30 shear rates spaced logarithmically and ranging from 0.1 s-1 to 1000 s-1. Zero-shear viscosity ({eta}0) values (in Pa·s) were then obtained from the viscosity/shear-rate profiles for each sample (Cronakis and Kasapis 1995Citation ).

Spectrophotometry measurements.

A CE 5501 (Cecil Instruments, Cambridge, UK) UV-visible (vis) spectrophotometer, operating at 37°C, was used to record the visible absorption at 560 nm of phenol red (Hobsley and Silen 1969Citation ) for all of the samples that had undergone rheological measurements. Each sample (0.5 mL) was put in a disposable cuvette and neutralized by adding 1.5 mL of a 25 g/100 g NH4OH water solution immediately before measurement. The 25 g/100 g NH4OH water solution was used to zero the spectrophotometer before each measurement. For each experiment, the values of the absorption of light at 560 nm by the samples retrieved via the nasogastric tube at later times were expressed as a proportion of the values obtained for the meal before ingestion. Because the absorption is directly proportional to the concentration of phenol red within the samples, the normalized values thus gave the fractional dilution of the digesta samples.

Satiety questionnaires.

The feelings of satiety of the volunteers were also assessed using a self-report scale technique (Hill et al. 1995Citation ). Before meal ingestion and every 12 min afterwards, volunteers were asked to give a number between 1 and 10 to indicate the following: 1) how full they felt (1 = "not full," 10 = "extremely full"); 2) how hungry (1 = "not hungry," 10 = "extremely hungry"); and 3) how much food they would eat (1 = "nothing," 10 = "an enormous meal") at that given time.

Data analysis.

T2 data sets were processed using Analyze software (Biomedical Imaging Resource, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN) by tracing a region of interest around the meal within the stomach and then using in-house written software as described previously (Gowland et al. 1998Citation ). T2 is the reciprocal of the time constant describing the decline in signal intensity of the images as the time delay in the imaging sequence (echo-time) is increased. The T2 values were converted to viscosity values using a previously established calibration curve (Marciani et al. 1998Citation ). The surrounding organs, fat, gastrointestinal gas and the nasogastric tube were discriminated easily and excluded from the region of interest. Measurements of the volume of the gastric contents were made by manually tracing a region of interest around the meal within the stomach on each slice and summing across the slices to determine the total volume. The averaged data sets of volume against time were then analyzed by calculating the half-emptying time (T1/2) and the area under the volume-time curve (AUC) (Elashoff et al. 1982Citation ). On three occasions, subjects failed to swallow all of the 500 mL within the required time; consequently, some data are missing.

Normal distributions of the data were not assumed, and results are therefore expressed as medians (range). Statistical analysis was performed using the nonparametric Friedman two-way ANOVA by ranks, followed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test for paired comparisons, using the Bonferroni correction to adjust the significance obtained for multiple comparisons. Page’s test for ordered alternatives was used to test the significance of any trends observed. It tests the hypothesis of an ordering in the response and is more specific than testing a difference in the alternatives as in Friedman’s two-way ANOVA (Siegel and Castellan 1988Citation ). Spearman’s nonparametric correlation coefficient was used to assess the significance of associations observed.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In vitro rheometry viscosity and T2 measurements.

Before ingestion, the viscosity of the four LBG meals given to volunteers ranged over four orders of magnitude (Table 1Citation ). Meal T2-1 increased logarithmically with LBG concentration from 0.46 to 0.98 s-1, and the average T2-1 values before ingestion differed significantly among different meals (P < 0.005). The logarithm of rheometer viscosity ({eta}0) of the meal before ingestion was linearly related to the transverse relaxation rate T2-1 (s-1) over the range of interest (r2 = 0.95).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Echo-planar imaging (EPI) measurements in human volunteers of meal viscosity in vitro1

 
In vivo experiments.

Figure 1Citation shows a multislice set of images acquired across the stomach. It can be seen that with the EPI sequence, the meal provided contrast sufficient to discriminate between the stomach contents and the surrounding tissues without the need for any additional contrast agent. Figure 2ACitation shows an example set of in vivo spin-echo EPI images used to measure the T2 of the meal within the stomach. The average viscosity ({eta}0) values calculated using EPI in vivo correlated well with average rheometer measured viscosity {eta}0 values (r2 = 0.88). (Fig. 2BCitation ). Viscosity declined immediately after swallowing for the meals because they were diluted by saliva and by gastric secretions. Although dilution of each meal was similar, the fall in viscosity of the more viscous meal was greater because of the exponential relationship between viscosity and concentration. Immediately after ingestion, the mean rheometer measured viscosity of the 1.5 g/100 g meal fell from 11 to 2 Pa·s. In contrast, the less viscous 0.25 g/100 g LBG meal showed a much smaller absolute fall. At 40 min, all of the meals showed a marked fall in the rheometry-measured viscosity with respect to the initial value of the corresponding meal (P < 0.05) (Table 1)Citation .



View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging (EPI) multislice set acquired across the gastric body and antrum of a 22-y-old female subject 12 min after ingestion of 0.5 g/100 g liquid, nonnutrient, low viscosity locust bean gum meal. Each EPI image is acquired in <130 ms with a slice thickness of 1 cm. Images are devoid of motion artifacts, and the test meal appears bright compared with the surrounding tissues.

 


View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging (EPI) measurements in humans of the viscosity of locust bean gum liquid, viscous, nonnutrient meals. (A) An example set of spin-echo EPI transverse relaxation time (T2) data set acquired 12 min after a normal subject ingested a 1 g/100 g locust bean gum meal, showing the fall in signal intensity with increasing echo-time (the 8 echo times shown are progressively increasing from 60 to 960 ms). Signal intensity is measured for each echo time and fitted to an exponential equation yielding the T2 of the test meal. In vitro calibrations of the inverse of T2 vs. viscosity are then used to calculate meal viscosity values in vivo. (B) The individual viscosity {eta}0 values calculated from the individual EPI data plotted against the {eta}0 values measured by the viscometer on the correspondent in vitro samples before ingestion and nasogastric tube aspirates. The values calculated using EPI in vivo correlated well with the values measured by the rheometer on the nasogastric aspirates (r2 = 0.88).

 
The 560-nm spectrophotometry measurement data (Table 1)Citation confirmed a progressive dilution of the stomach contents (Page’s test for trend, P < 0.01 for all meals), due mainly to the addition of saliva during swallowing and then to gastric secretions.

Gastric emptying curves were approximately exponential in form for all of these meals, and the gastric volumes declined rapidly with little meal remaining after 90 min. The relationship between gastric emptying time (T1/2) and AUC for the gastric emptying curve with initial meal viscosity is shown in Table 2Citation . There was a significant trend (P < 0.05) for the AUC to increase with initial meal viscosity.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Effect of initial meal viscosity in human volunteers on half gastric emptying time and area under the curve for gastric emptying (AUC) for the four locust bean gum liquid, nonnutrient, viscous meals1

 
The volunteers’ sensations of fullness, hunger and appetite were plotted against time (Fig. 3Citation ). The sense of fullness experienced by volunteers during the emptying of the LBG meal was significantly influenced by initial meal viscosity (Friedman ANOVA, {chi}2 = 9.4, P < 0.02), with a significant trend toward increasing fullness with increasing initial viscosity (Page’s test for trend, P < 0.05). Appetite decreased with increasing meal viscosity (Table 3Citation ). Hunger fell immediately after drinking, especially for the 1 and 1.5 g/100 g LBG meals, but then increased rapidly again. The AUC for hunger vs. time was significantly related to viscosity (Friedman ANOVA, {chi}2 = 10.4, P < 0.02) with a significant trend for increasing initial viscosity to be associated with decreased hunger (Page’s test for trend, P < 0.001).



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. The variation with time of the self-assessment satiety questionnaire ratings for the sense of fullness experienced by human volunteers after ingestion of 0.25 (n = 8) and 1.5 g/100 g (n = 6) locust bean gum meals. Each data point represents the mean ± SEM of the self-assessment scores at that time point. The sense of fullness was significantly influenced by initial meal viscosity (Friedman ANOVA, {chi}2 = 9.4, P < 0.02), with a significant trend to increasing fullness with increasing initial viscosity (Page’s test for trend, P < 0.05).

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Effect of initial meal viscosity on the subjective feelings of satiety in human volunteers for the four locust bean gum liquid, nonnutrient, viscous meals1

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
This study demonstrates for the first time that it is possible to monitor in vivo and noninvasively the viscosity of a model meal using EPI, by measuring the transverse relaxation time T2 of the meal and calibrating T2-1 against meal viscosity. The EPI sequence used was a single-shot MRI technique, which is fast enough to give "snap-shot" images devoid of motion artifact. LBG meals appear bright in the images compared with the surrounding tissues. This makes it possible to identify the stomach contents easily without the need to add contrast agents to the meal, which might alter gastric emptying.

LBG is a simple galactomannan polysaccharide derived from the endosperm of the bean; it possesses physical properties that make it particularly suitable for this study. LBG water solutions are nonnutrient, colorless and tasteless; in general, they were well tolerated by volunteers. Liquid solutions of different viscosity can be prepared easily by varying the concentration. Both the viscosity and MRI parameters of such a solution depend on the concentration and entanglement of the polysaccharide coils (Cronakis and Kasapis 1995Citation ), a fact that allows us to use MRI to assess changes in intragastric viscosity noninvasively (Marciani et al. 1998Citation ). Importantly for this study, the viscosity and T2 of the meal, unlike other viscous gums such as pectin, are unaffected by pH or gastric juice (Marciani et al. 1998Citation ). The 0.25 g/100 g LBG meal was similar in viscosity to water, whereas the 1.5 g/100 g meal was just pourable and was about the most viscous meal that could be swallowed. Even so, three subjects experienced nausea and bloating and failed to drink more viscous meals within the requested time; however, this may have resulted in part from the discomfort caused by intubation and the difficulties in swallowing a viscous meal in the presence of a nasogastric tube. However, previous studies suggested that a nasogastric tube does not significantly alter gastric emptying (Müller-Lissner et al. 1982Citation ).

We found a good correlation between viscosity assessed by EPI and standard bench viscometry. Some scatter will be introduced into the EPI data by the peristaltic movements, which might move spins out from the slice of the refocusing pulse, thus reducing the apparent T2. This could be overcome by using a thicker slice for the refocusing pulse. Errors in viscometry measurements performed on the aspirates could arise from small particulates, which would disturb the rheometer measurements. The four points that lie above the line of fit on Figure 2BCitation correspond to data acquired at t = 40 min for the more viscous meals. This systematic error between the different measures of viscosity is probably due to underestimation of mean viscosity by the rheometer measurements because the aspirates will selectively sample the least viscous part of the meals. Using T2 mapping, we have subsequently observed the heterogeneity in meal dilution (Marciani et al. 1999Citation ). Mapping was not performed in this study because of the presence of the nasogastric tube.

This method allows us to assess meal dilution, gastric distention and satiety feelings simultaneously, and to relate them to meal viscosity. An interesting observation made in these experiments was the process of progressive dilution, which rapidly reduced the viscosity of the LBG meals. This may be due to either salivation or acid secretion in response to the meals. Basal acid output of 40–80 mL/h would not be enough to account for the 150 mL of extra fluid required to produce the meal dilution we observed, but meal-stimulated secretion, which can reach 200 mL/h, could easily do so. Salivary output is usually no >75 mL/h, but may increase under the stimulus of a nasogastric tube (Sonnenberg et al. 1982Citation ). Rapid dilution reduced the initial large differences in meal viscosity, minimizing the differences in the gastric emptying rates of these nonnutrient meals. Similar marked reductions in meal viscosity after ingestion have been observed previously in rats and in pigs and have been reported to be largely the result of dilution (Cameron-Smith et al. 1994Citation , Cherbut et al. 1990Citation ).

The delayed emptying of the most viscous meals was predictable because increased viscosity would be expected to reduce flow out of the stomach given a constant force. However, the stomach probably adjusts to increased viscosity for the following reason: although viscosity varied 1000-fold between meals, emptying rates differed by a factor of only 1.3. This suggests that the stomach is doing more work in response to higher viscosity meals; however, models based on flow velocity data are required to prove this. Whether similar results occur with nutrient meals remains to be seen because increased outflow resistance due to pylorospasm and altered duodenal motility is likely to be much more important than with nonnutrient meals, although models based on velocity data are required to prove this. Hence, to investigate the relationship between gastric function and viscous/nutrient meals, we have recently introduced a nutrient LBG test meal, which has T2 properties similar to those of the nonnutrient meal used in this study (Marciani et al. 1999Citation ).

The increased satiety and decreased hunger induced by the more viscous meals may have been related to the increased gastric volumes and slower emptying, or to an effect of viscosity on the process of ingestion, which may alter satiety. or stretch receptors in the stomach. High fiber meals have been reported previously to be associated with greater gastric secretion (Grimes and Goddard 1977Citation ), and increased secretions are known also to be a response to high fiber diets (Johansen and Bach Knudsen 1994Citation ). This may reflect in part the cephalic effects of the increased chewing that such meals require, or it may be a direct response of the oral cavity and gut to the tactile qualities of the meals (McIntyre et al. 1997Citation ). It is also possible that the stomach alters its secretions in response to the changes in antral work required to empty the more viscous meals.

We believe that this novel technique will allow investigation of the relationship between meal viscosity and other aspects of gastrointestinal motor function, such as intragastric flow and motility, which can be monitored noninvasively by MRI. As described here, this technique is limited to model nonnutrient meals, although it can be extended to nutrient and particulate model meals. The use of model meals, rather that real meals, is necessarily artificial, but allows us to separate out the important variables influencing gastric behavior. The technique is well tolerated and could be applied easily to patients with disordered gastric function, including various forms of gastroparesis and non-ulcer dyspepsia. A better understanding of the effects of meal viscosity on satiety and gastric emptying will also be of great importance to the food industry in identifying nonnutrient gums, which could be added to convenience foods to increase the satiety they induce.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Presented in part at the United European Gastroenterology Week in Birmingham, England [Spiller, R. C., Marciani, L., Manoj, P., Young, P., Moore, R., Wright, J., Rose, D., Fillery-Travis, A., Johnson, I. & Gowland, P. (1997) A novel echo-planar imaging (EPI) method for measuring the viscosity and emptying of a model meal in man. Gut 41 (suppl. 3): A41 (abs.)] and at the Digestive Disease Week in New Orleans, LA [Marciani, L., Wright, J., Manoj, P., Moore, R. J., Young, P., Bush, D., Al-Sahab, S., Fillery-Travis, A., Gowland, P. A. & Spiller, R. C. (1998) Noninvasive echo-planar imaging (EPI) monitoring of intragastric viscosity, dilution and emptying of viscous meals in normal subjects. Gastroenterology 114 (suppl.): G3282 (abs.)]. Back

2 Supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Swindon, UK). Back

4 Abbreviations used: AUC, area under the curve; EPI, echo-planar imaging; LBG, locust bean gum; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance; T1/2, half emptying time; T2, relaxation time; T2-1, transverse relaxation rate. Back

Manuscript received April 28, 1999. Initial review completed June 11, 1999. Revision accepted September 27, 1999.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 SUBJECTS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

1. Bergmann J. F., Chassany O., Petit A., Triki R., Caulin C., Segrestaa J. M. Correlation between echographic gastric emptying and appetite: influence of psyllium. Gut 1992;33:1042-1043[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Blackburn N. A., Redfern J. S., Jarjis H., Holgate A. M., Hanning I., Scarpello J. H. B., Johnson I. T., Read W. The mechanism of action of guar gum in improving glucose tolerance in man. Clin. Sci. (Lond.) 1984;66:329-336[Medline]

3. Boulby P., Moore R., Gowland P., Spiller R. C. Fat delays emptying but increases forward and backward antral flow as assessed by flow sensitive magnetic resonance imaging. Neurogastroenterol. Mot. 1999;11:27-36[Medline]

4. Cameron-Smith D., Collier G. R., O’Dea K. Effect of soluble dietary fiber on the viscosity of gastrointestinal contents and the acute glycaemic response in the rat. Br. J. Nutr. 1994;71:563-571[Medline]

5. Chaudhury T. K. Use of 99m Tc-DTPA for measuring gastric emptying time. J. Nucl. Med. 1974;15:391-395[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Cherbut C., Albina E., Champ M., Doublier J. L., Lecannu G. Action of guar gums on the viscosity of digestive contents and on the gastrointestinal motor function in pigs. Digestion 1990;46:205-213[Medline]

7. Cronakis I. S., Kasapis S. Food applications of biopolymers. Theory and practice. Charambolous G. eds. Food Flavours: Generation, Analysis and Process Influence 1995:75-88 Elsevier Science Amsterdam, The Netherlands

8. Di Lorenzo C., Williams C. M., Hajnal F., Valenzuela J. E. Pectin delays gastric emptying and increases satiety in obese subjects. Gastroenterology 1988;95:1211-1215[Medline]

9. Elashoff J. D., Reedy T. J., Meyer J. H. Analysis of gastric emptying data. Gastroenterology 1982;83:1306-1312[Medline]

10. Evans D. F., Lamont G., Stehling M. K., Blamire A. M., Gibbs P., Coxon R., Hardcastle J. D., Mansfield P. Prolonged monitoring of the upper gastrointestinal tract using echo planar magnetic resonance imaging. Gut 1993;34:848-852[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Gowland P. A., Freeman A., Issa B., Boulby P., Duncan K. R., Moore R. J., Baker P. N., Bowtell R. W., Johnson I. R., Worthington B. S. In-vivo relaxation time measurements in the human placenta using echo-planar imaging at 0.5 T. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1998;16:241-247[Medline]

12. Grimes D. S., Goddard J. Gastric emptying of wholemeal and white bread. Gut 1977;18:725-729[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Haskell W. L., Spiller G. A., Jensen C. D., Ellis B. K., Gates J. E. Role of water-soluble dietary fibre in the management of elevated plasma cholesterol in healthy subjects. Prev. Cardiol. 1992;69:433-439

14. Hill A. J., Rogers P. J., Blundell J. E. Techniques for the experimental measurement of human eating behaviour and food intake: a practical guide. Int. J. Obes. 1995;19:361-375

15. Hills B. P., Cano C., Belton P. S. Proton NMR relaxation studies of aqueous polysaccharide systems. Macromolecules 1991;24:2944-2950

16. Hobsley M., Silen W. Use of an inert marker (phenol red) to improve accuracy in gastric secretion studies. Gut 1969;10:787-795[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Howseman A. M., Stehling M. K., Chapman B., Coxon R., Turner R., Ordidge J., Cawley M. G., Glover P., Mansfield P. Improvements in snap-shot nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Br. J. Radiol. 1988;61:822-828[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Issa B., Freeman A., Boulby P., Wright J., Gowland P., Bowtell R., Spiller R., Mansfield P. Gastric motility by tagged EPI. Magma 1994;2:295-298

19. Johansen H. N., Bach Knudsen K. E. Effects of wheat-flour and oat mill fractions on jejunal flow, starch degradation and absorption of glucose over an isolated loop of jejunum in pigs. Br. J. Nutr. 1994;72:299-313[Medline]

20. Krotkiewski M. Effect of guar gum on body-weight, hunger ratings and metabolism in obese subjects. Br. J. Nutr. 1984;52:97-105[Medline]

21. Mansfield P. Multi-planar image formation using NMR spin echoes. J. Phys. C Solid State Phys. 1977;10:L55-L58

22. Marciani L., Manoj P., Hills B. P., Moore R. J., Young P., Fillery-Travis A., Spiller R. C., Gowland P. Echo-planar imaging relaxometry to measure the viscosity of a model meal. J. Magn. Res. 1998;135:82-86[Medline]

23. Marciani L., Spiller R. C., Gowland P. A., Manoj P., Moore R. J., Young P., Al-Sahab S., Fillery-Travis A. Influence of meal viscosity and nutrient content on gastric emptying, meal dilution and satiety assessed non-invasively by echo-planar imaging. Gastroenterology 1999;116:G4504(abs.)

24. McIntyre A., Vincent R. M., Perkins A. C., Spiller R. C. Effect of bran, ispaghula, and inert plastic particles on gastric emptying and small bowel transit in humans: the role of physical factors. Gut 1997;40:223-227[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Müller-Lissner S. A., Fimmel C. J., Will N., Müller-Duysing W., Heinzel F., Blum A. L. Effect of gastric and transpyloric tubes on gastric emptying and duodenogastric reflux. Gastroenterology 1982;83:1276-1279[Medline]

26. Prove J., Ehrlein H.-J. Motor function of gastric antrum and pylorus for evacuation of low and high viscosity meals in dogs. Gut 1982;23:150-156[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Sandhu K. S., El Samahi M. M., Mena I., Dooley C. P., Valenzuela J. E. Effect of pectin on gastric emptying and gastroduodenal motility in normal subjects. Gastroenterology 1987;92:486-492[Medline]

28. Schwizer W., Fraser R., Borovicka J., Asal K., Crelier G., Kunz P., Boesiger P., Fried M. Measurement of proximal and distal gastric motility with magnetic resonance imaging. Am. J. Physiol. 1996;271:G217-G222[Abstract/Free Full Text]

29. Schwizer W., Fraser R., Maecke H., Siebold K., Funck R., Fried M. Gd-DOTA as a gastrointestinal contrast agent for gastric emptying measurements with MRI. Magn. Res. Med. 1994;31:388-393[Medline]

30. Schwizer W., Maecke H., Fried M. Measurement of gastric emptying by magnetic resonance imaging in humans. Gastroenterology 1992;103:369-376[Medline]

31. Siegel S., Castellan N. J. Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences 1988 McGraw-Hill Singapore.

32. Sonnenberg A., Steinkamp U., Weise A., Berges W., Wienbeck M., Rohner H. G., Peter P. Salivary secretion in reflux esophagitis. Gastroenterology 1982;83:889-895[Medline]

33. Stehling M. K., Evans D. F., Lamont G., Ordidge R. J., Howseman A. M., Chapman B., Coxon R., Mansfield P., Hardcastle J. D., Coupland R. E. Gastrointestinal-tract dynamic MR studies with echo-planar imaging. Radiology 1989;171:41-46[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Wilmshurst P., Crawley J.C.W. The measurement of gastric transit time in obese subjects using 24Na and the effects of energy content and guar gum on gastric emptying and satiety. Br. J. Nutr. 1980;44:1-6[Medline]

35. Wright J., Adams V., Gowland P., Spiller R., Evans D., Mansfield P. Gastric mixing of a solid and liquid meal measured by echo planar magnetic resonance imaging (EPI). Gastroenterology 1996;110:A781(abs.)

36. Zavoral J. H., Hannan P., Fields D. J., Hanson M. N., Frantz I. D., Kuba K., Elmer P., Jacobs D. R. The hypolipidemic effect of locust bean gum food products in familial hypercholesterolemic adults and children. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1983;38:285-294[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
K. R. Juvonen, A.-K. Purhonen, M. Salmenkallio-Marttila, L. Lahteenmaki, D. E. Laaksonen, K.-H. Herzig, M. I. J. Uusitupa, K. S. Poutanen, and L. J. Karhunen
Viscosity of Oat Bran-Enriched Beverages Influences Gastrointestinal Hormonal Responses in Healthy Humans
J. Nutr., March 1, 2009; 139(3): 461 - 466.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
H. P. Peters, H. M Boers, E. Haddeman, S. M Melnikov, and F. Qvyjt
No effect of added {beta}-glucan or of fructooligosaccharide on appetite or energy intake
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2009; 89(1): 58 - 63.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GutHome page
D Sifrim
Relevance of volume and proximal extent of reflux in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease
Gut, February 1, 2005; 54(2): 175 - 178.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
C. L. Hoad, P. Rayment, R. C. Spiller, L. Marciani, B. d. C. Alonso, C. Traynor, D. J. Mela, H. P. F. Peters, and P. A. Gowland
In Vivo Imaging of Intragastric Gelation and Its Effect on Satiety in Humans
J. Nutr., September 1, 2004; 134(9): 2293 - 2300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
D. Geleva, W. Thomas, M. C. Gannon, and J. M. Keenan
A Solubilized Cellulose Fiber Decreases Peak Postprandial Cholecystokinin Concentrations after a Liquid Mixed Meal in Hypercholesterolemic Men and Women
J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2194 - 2203.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
M. Nishimukai, H. Hara, and Y. Aoyama
The Addition of Soybean Phosphatidylcholine to Triglyceride Increases Suppressive Effects on Food Intake and Gastric Emptying in Rats
J. Nutr., May 1, 2003; 133(5): 1255 - 1258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
F. Mariotti, M. E Pueyo, D. Tome, R. Benamouzig, and S. Mahe
Guar gum does not impair the absorption and utilization of dietary nitrogen but affects early endogenous urea kinetics in humans
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2001; 74(4): 487 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
L. Marciani, P. A. Gowland, R. C. Spiller, P. Manoj, R. J. Moore, P. Young, and A. J. Fillery-Travis
Effect of meal viscosity and nutrients on satiety, intragastric dilution, and emptying assessed by MRI
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, June 1, 2001; 280(6): G1227 - G1233.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol.Home page
L. Marciani, P. A. Gowland, A. Fillery-Travis, P. Manoj, J. Wright, A. Smith, P. Young, R. Moore, and R. C. Spiller
Assessment of antral grinding of a model solid meal with echo-planar imaging
Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2001; 280(5): G844 - G849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
I. Bourdon, B. Olson, R. Backus, B. D. Richter, P. A. Davis, and B. O. Schneeman
Beans, as a Source of Dietary Fiber, Increase Cholecystokinin and Apolipoprotein B48 Response to Test Meals in Men
J. Nutr., May 1, 2001; 131(5): 1485 - 1490.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Marciani, L.
Right arrow Articles by Fillery-Travis, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Marciani, L.
Right arrow Articles by Fillery-Travis, A. J.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 2000 by American Society for Nutrition