![]() |
|
|
Unité de Biochimie Toxicologique et Cancérologique, Département des Sciences Pharmaceutiques, Université Catholique de Louvain, UCL-BCTC 7369, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
2To whom correspondence should be addressed.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: inulin oligofructose breast carcinogenesis tumor growth
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Carbohydrates such as inulin and oligofructose, which are nondigestible
in the upper digestive tract, selectively promote the growth of certain
types of bacteria, e.g., Bifidobacteria (Gibson et al. 1995
); thus they are classified as prebiotics
(Gibson and Roberfroid 1995
) and as soluble dietary
fiber (Roberfroid 1993
).
Because it is generally recognized that dietary fibers may act as
anticarcinogens (Wattenberg 1992
), it appeared
worthwhile to test the hypothesis that some of the recently identified
soluble dietary fibers might behave in the same way in tumor pathology.
In line with this hypothesis, the work reported here had the following two objectives: 1) to investigate the possible anticarcinogenic action of oligofructose in rat mammary carcinogenesis induced by methylnitrosourea; and 2) to test the hypothesis that oligofructose, inulin or pectin might help to control the growth of two lines of transplantable mouse tumors.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
From wk 4 after the carcinogen injection until the end of the experiment, the size, number and position of mammary tumors were manually assessed and their volume evaluated weekly by measuring three perpendicular dimensions with a vernier caliper. At wk 27, rats were anesthetized with diethylether and killed by exsanguination. A detailed autopsy was performed with tumor counting, measuring and description. The tumors and organs (liver, lung, kidneys, mammary glands and lymphatic nodes) were macroscopically examined, and specimens were taken for histopathologic examination (after fixation in 5% formalin solution, paraffin embedding and staining with hematoxylin-eosin).
In the second investigation, mice of the control groups were fed the basal diet for experimental mice A04 (UAR) and given free access to water. This basal diet contained 69% (wt/wt) carbohydrate (including 35% starch), 18% protein, 4% fiber, 3% lipids and 5% minerals and vitamins. The caloric value of this diet was 3.73 kcal/g. To 85 g of this basal diet, 15 g of oligofructose, inulin or pectin was added. The mice of both experimental groups were given 7 d before tumor transplantation and consumed the basal or experimental diets up to the end of experiment. Oligofructose (Raftilose) and inulin (Raftiline HP) were supplied by Orafti.
As a model for cancer growth, 106 viable
neoplastic cells of two lines of transplantable mouse tumors were
intramuscularly transplanted into the right thigh as follows:
1) EMT6, a mammary carcinoma (Rockwell et al. 1972
), was transplanted into young female BALB/c mice of ~20
g body weight (Iffa Credo); and 2) TLT, a transplantable
liver tumor (Taper et al. 1966
), was transplanted in
young male NMRI mice (Animalerie Facultaire, UCL, Brussels, Belgium).
To quantify tumor growth, two perpendicular tumor dimensions were
measured with a vernier caliper, and the mean tumor surface in
mm2 was calculated for each time period for
1012 mice (TLT tumor) or 911 mice (EMT6 tumor) per group. These
mean tumor surfaces in mm2 for each group at
individual time points are presented in the figures and were utilized
for statistical analysis. For TLT tumor, the measurements started at d
6 after tumor transplantation and were performed twice weekly until the
first animal died. Because the EMT6 tumor was growing more slowly,
those measurements started 18 d after the tumor transplantation
and were performed once weekly until the first mouse died. The results
of each experiment were confirmed by a second experiment completed for
each tumor line at another time. The results were cumulatively
calculated for each tumor line.
Multiple ANOVA and the Scheffé test were used for statistical comparison of the results among the different experimental and control groups.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1) fructans are classified as resistant
carbohydrates to which the dietary fiber concept applies. The
beneficial role of such food ingredients on carcinogenesis remains an
important topic for scientific research. Supplementation of a rat diet with 15% oligofructose negatively modulated rat mammary carcinogenesis induced by methylnitrosourea by decreasing the incidence of tumors (in term of the number of rats bearing the tumors) and the total number of tumors per group when compared with a control group fed a basal diet containing starch as the only carbohydrate. Tumors in other organs and metastases were observed only in rats from the control group. Because the protective diet was given after the phase of initiation, during the phase of promotion and progression, this anticarcinogenic effect can be considered as antipromoting and/or antiprogressing. However, the interesting results of this preliminary experiment require confirmation in a larger experiment.
The growth of solid tumors made of two different transplantable tumor cell lines is distinctly inhibited in mice fed a 15% oligofructose-, inulin- or pectin-supplemented diet. There was practically no difference in the tumor growth inhibitory effect among all three dietary nondigestible carbohydrates in the experiments on TLT tumor, but oligofructose appeared to be slightly more active than inulin or pectin on EMT6 tumor. In both tumors, this inhibitory effect reached almost 50% compared with mice fed the control diet.
There are several hypothetical mechanisms that may be involved in
the inhibitory and/or anticancinogenic effect of these nondigestible
carbohydrates on tumor growth and/or appearance. These carbohydrates
are nondigestible by endogenous enzymes, but they are actively
fermented by colonic bacteria. In addition, the chicory fructans
selectively promoting Bifidobacteria are acting as
prebiotics, thus modifying the composition of colonic microflora
(Gibson et al. 1995
, Wang and Gibson 1993
). Such alterations (and others that are similar) of the
colonic microflora have been reported to have an inhibitory action on
tumor incidence and/or growth (Reddy et al. 1973
,
Reddy and Rivenson 1993
). The same investigators are
reporting that inulin and oligofructose reduce the incidence of colonic
aberrant crypt foci in azoxymethane-treated rats.
Moreover, it has been reported that a cell wall preparation from
Bifidobacterium infantis has a tumor-suppressive effect
(Sekine et al. 1994
, Tsuyuki et al. 1991
); another report concerned the antimelanoma activity of
inulin (Cooper and Carter 1986
). More recently,
Rumney and Rowland (1995)
reviewed the potential
anticarcinogenic effect of nondigestible oligosaccharides and concluded
that the following two lines of evidence are suggestive of such an
effect: 1) "certain biomarkers thought to be affected by
cancer risk are beneficially affected by oligosaccharides consumption
in animals and man;" 2) "they increase the numbers of
lactic acid bacteria in the gut, bacteria which show antigenotoxic and
anticarcinogenic effects. `'
Although tumor cell proliferation is dependent on glucose availability
because these cells acquire the major part of their energy from the
glycolytic pathway (Cay et al. 1992
), it has been
reported that chicory fructans decrease serum glucose (Kok et al. 1996
, Yamashita et al. 1984
) and insulin
levels (Kok et al. 1996
), and it has been hypothesized
(Basserga 1995
, Giovanucci 1995
) that
hyperinsulinemia could be a key factor in carcinogenesis and tumor
development. Change in insulin sensitivity could thus be part of the
mechanism of the tumor growth inhibition by nondigestible
carbohydrates.
Finally, Kuhajda et al. (1994)
demonstrated that human
cancer cells cultivated in vitro strongly require endogenous fatty acid
synthesis for their growth and that the inhibition of this metabolic
pathway can be considered as a new and promising target for cancer
therapy. Complementary to this idea are recent observations that
chicory fructans, which inhibit tumor growth, also decrease
triglycerides, phospholipids and VLDL in serum by lowering de novo
lipogenesis in the liver (Fiordaliso et al. 1995
,
Kok et al. 1996
).
Further studies are required to elucidate which of the above-mentioned mechanisms are essential in the tumor inhibitory and/or anticancinogenic effect of nondigestible carbohydrates. It is possible that all or some of them are necessary to create a metabolic chain reaction conditioning these beneficial effects. More advanced investigations on other tumors and on the mechanisms involved may lead to a considerable improvement in the understanding of their action, thus enabling their introduction as food components that reduce the risk of cancers.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Basserga R. The insulin-like growth factor I receptor; a key to tumor growth?. J. Cancer Res. 1995;55:149-252
2. Cay O., Radnell M., Jeppsson B., Ahren B., Bengmark S. Inhibitory effect of 2-deoxy-D-glucose on liver tumor growth in rats. J. Cancer Res. 1992;52:5794-5796
3. Cooper P. D., Carter M. The anti-melanoma activity of inulin in mice. Mol. Immunol. 1986;23:903-908[Medline]
4. Edelman J., Dickerson A. G. The metabolism of fructose polymers in plants. Biochem. J. 1966;98:787-794[Medline]
5. Fiordaliso, M. F., Kok, N., Goethals, F., Desager, J. P., Deboyser, D., Roberfroid, M. & Delzenne, N. (l995) Dietary oligofructose lowers triglycerides, phospholipids and cholesterol in serum and very low density lipoproteins of rats. Lipids 30: 163167.
6. Gibson G. R., Beatty E. B., Wang X., Cummings J. H. Selective stimulation of Bifidobacteria in the human colon by oligofructose and inulin. Gastroenterology 1995;108:975-982[Medline]
7. Gibson G. R., Roberfroid M. B. Dietary modulation of the human colonic microbiota: introducing the concept of prebiotics. J. Nutr. 1995;125:1401-1412
8. Giovannucci G. Inulin and colon cancer. Cancer Causes Control 1995;6:164-179[Medline]
9. Kok N., Roberfroid M., Delzenne N. Involvement of lipogenesis in the lower VLDL secretion induced by oligofructose in rats. Br. J. Nutr. 1996;76:881-890[Medline]
10.
Kuhajda F.P.J.K., Wood F. D., Hennigar R. A., Jacobs L. B., Dick J. D., Pw G. R. Fatty acid synthesis: a potential selective target for antineoplastic therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994;91:6379-6383
11. Milner J. A. Reducing the risk of cancer. Goldberg I. eds. Functional Foods 1994:39-70 Chapman & Hall London, UK.
12. Reddy G. V., Shabani K. M., Benerjee M. R. Inhibitory effect of yogurt on Ehrlich ascites tumor cell proliferation. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1973;50:815-817
13.
Reddy B. S., Rivenson A. Inhibitory effect of Bifidobacterium longum on colon, mammary and liver carcinogenesis induced by 2-amino-3-methylimidazo-[4,5,-f]-quinoline, a food mutagen. Cancer Res 1993;53:3914-3918
14. Roberfroid M. B. Dietary modulation of experimental neoplastic development: role of fat and fibre content and caloric intake. Mutat. Res. 1991;259:351-362[Medline]
15. Roberfroid M. Dietary fiber, inulin and oligofructose: a review comparing their physiological effects. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 1993;33:103-148
16. Rockwell S. C., Kallman R. F., Fajardo L. P. Characteristics of a serially transplanted mouse mammary tumor and its tissue culture-adapted derivative. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1972;49:735-746
17. Rumney C., Rowland L. Non-digestible oligosaccharides potential anticarcinogenic agents?. Br. Nutr. Found. Bull. 1995;20:194-203
18. Sekine K., Watanabe-Sekine E., Ohta J., Toida T., Tatsuki T., Kawashima T., Hashimoto Y. Induction and activation of tumoricidal cells in vivo and in vitro by bacterial cell wall of Bifidobacterium infantis. Bifid. Microflora 1994;13:65-77
19.
Taper H. S., Wooley G. W., Teller M. N., Lardis M. P. A new transplantable mouse liver tumor of spontaneous origin. Cancer Res 1966;26:143-148
20. Tsuyuki S., Yamazaki S., Akashiba H., Kamimura H., Sekine K., Toida T., Saito M., Kawashima T., Ueda K. Tumor-suppressive effect of a cell wall preparation, WPG, from Bifidobacterium infantis in germ free and florabearing mice. Bifid. Microflora 1991;10:43-52
21. Van Loo J., Coussement P., De Leenheer L., Hoebregs H., Smits G. On the presence of inulin and oligofructose as natural ingredients in the Western diet. CRC Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 1995;35:525-552
22. Wang X., Gibson G. Effects of the in vitro fermentation of oligofructose and inulin by bacteria growing in the human large intestine. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 1993;75:373-380[Medline]
23. Wattenberg L. Inhibition of carcinogenicity by minor dietary constituents. Cancer Res 1992;52:2085s-2091s[Medline]
24. Williams C. M., Dickerson J. W. Nutrition and cancer. Some biochemical mechanisms. Nutr. Res. Rev. 1990;3:45-100
25. Yamashita K., Kawai K., Itakura M. Effects of fructooligosaccharides on blood glucose and serum lipids in diabetic subjects. Nutr. Res. 1984;4:961-966
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||