![]() |
|
|

School of Dietetics and Human Nutrition and
*
Centre for Indigenous Peoples' Nutrition and Environment, McGill University, Macdonald Campus, Quebec H9X 3V9 and
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal
2To whom correspondence should be addressed.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: food security and nutrient intake urban food banks and nutrition urban food security food bank users' nutrient intake food bank users' diet
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The term "food bank" initially referred to a central collection and
distribution center that provided bulk food to local food relief
programs; the local food depot or food pantry then gave food assistance
directly to those in need. Today the media, community workers, and the
clients themselves most often refer to the local food assistance sites
as food banks; we use the term food bank in the local food relief
context. The food bank obtains emergency food supplies from a central
collection center, market discards, or food company donations; augments
supplies through purchases from fund-raising drives or from food
donations by residents of communities (Riches 1989
;
Vozenilek 1998
); and gives the collected food to those
in need of it. Emergency food bags were found to vary greatly in the
amount of nutrients they provide (Jacobs Starkey and Kuhnlein 1996
), and the food bank system was criticized as providing
limited nutritional support in a community (Riches 1989
).
Despite the concern for food security and nutrient intake adequacy
among urban food assistance recipients (Jacobs Starkey et al. 1995
, Kendall et al. 1996
, Radimer et al. 1990
, Wolfe et al. 1996
), most studies provide
only a snapshot of the food assistance program participants from a
single interview or from synthesis of focus group discussions
(Badun et al. 1995
, Hargrove et al. 1994
,
Smith and Hoerr 1992
, Tarasuk and MacLean 1990
). Few studies of food bank users address nutrient intake
throughout the month, looking at week-to-week variation in food intake,
or at the end of the month when the time since income was received is
greatest and food and financial resources are considered to be most
limited. Taren et al. (1990)
reported the number of servings of
different food items per week decreased during the last week of the
month; however, second or third servings of the same food were not
counted. Other studies have been limited by the use of small
convenience samples (Emmons 1986
, Villalon 1998
).
Increased health risk among low-income people is well documented;
nutritional status is one indicator of wellness, and an important
health monitoring parameter (Margetts and Jackson 1993
,
Najman 1993
). Definitive nutrient intake data are not
available from difficult-to-sample populations, such as emergency food
recipients. The need for greater understanding of obesity,
protein-energy malnutrition, iron, vitamin A, and folate status among
these people, as well as diet variety, was expressed (Anderson 1990
). Further, two priorities from the International
Conference on Nutrition are relevant to food assistance programs in
industrialized countries: 1) to assess, analyze, and monitor
nutrition situations; and 2) to improve household food
security (Food and Agriculture Organization 1995
).
We investigated the week-by-week over the income month food and
nutrient intakes of adult Quebec female and male food bank
users, to describe the overall nutrient intake and to characterize the
variation in ability to meet nutrient recommendations as the month
progressed. An earlier publication described the sociodemographic
characteristics of the study group (Jacobs Starkey et al. 1998
). The objectives of this analysis were threefold:
1) to assess the average diet over a month (mean of four
recalls) and determine correlates of poor overall intake; 2)
to describe any decline in intake over the income month and determine
for which clients this decline was most pronounced; and 3)
to describe the characteristics of clients who had the most highly
variable diet over the income month, as this may reflect food
insecurity.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Fifty-seven community organizations (sites) whose primary purpose was to direct food aid to clients were identified from a census of 167 agencies receiving supplies from a central food bank in metropolitan Montreal. Sites were stratified into three groups based on the number of people served per month: small sites (n = 21) provided food to <100 clients per month, medium (n = 20) 100499, and large sites (n = 16) served >500 people per month, for a total of >22,000 people served each month. A total of 20 individual sites were randomly selected in numbers proportionate to their representation of food banks of that size, and clients were then systematically selected at each site, based on the percentage of people served in each stratum (5.5% small, 20.7% medium, and 73.8% from large sites). A random number was generated each sampling day to designate the first client to be interviewed; after completion of that interview, the next person in line was approached for an interview, and so forth.
Participating clients signed a consent form. Eligibility criteria were 18 y of age or older, from a household of known address within two bus transfers from the food assistance site, and spoken English or French in the home unless an interpreter was available. Clients entered the study at any time during the month, when they came to the food bank to obtain supplies; only one respondent per household was enrolled. Based on when study participants received their income, largely as one social assistance check per month, we determined whether they were in income-week 1, 2, 3 or 4 of the month. Income-week served as an indicator of financial risk (more money at hand in income-week 1 than income-week 4). Interviews were conducted in winter (>NOREF>February to April 1995) when disposable income for food was expected to be most limited by other seasonal costs. All procedures were approved by the McGill University Ethics Committee.
Measurement sequence.
Once enrolled, while still at the food bank, clients completed a dietitian-administered structured questionnaire, including self-reported height and weight, and initial 24-h dietary recall interview. They were interviewed weekly thereafter at home or other convenient location, to complete three additional 24-h recalls. Thus, each person who completed the study was interviewed a total of four times. These clients were paid an honorarium ($25) at the final visit. All days of the week were represented in the recall data.
Repeated in-person 24-h recalls were used because preliminary work revealed a number of food assistance recipients without a telephone or with access only to a common-use telephone. Trained dietitian-interviewers used household food portion models to enhance correct estimation of portion size and decrease respondent bias. Clients were asked if they had visited a food bank in the interval since the previous interview; however, data on the source of foods consumed were not collected during the recall interviews.
Data analysis.
Each 24-h recall was coded by the dietitian who conducted the
interview, using food codes representing the Canadian Nutrient File
(The Food Processor, Version 5.03; ESHA Research, Salem, OR). The
software program selected was reported to be appropriate for the
nutrients analyzed (Lee et al. 1995
). The percentage
contribution of protein, fat, and carbohydrate to energy intake was
determined for each income-week and compared to the Nutrition
Recommendations for Canadians (Minister of National Health and
Welfare 1990
).
The contribution of recalled food to the food groups of Canada's Food
Guide to Healthy Eating (Health and Welfare Canada 1992
)
was determined using serving sizes provided in the
Guide. Volume and dimensions were converted to gram
weights, as needed. For comparison with the Quebec Nutrition Survey
(Santé Québec 1995
), servings for the meat
and alternatives group were calculated using 60 g of meat, fish,
or poultry; 200 mL of canned beans; and 50 mL of peanut butter.
Mean energy and nutrient intake over the four recalls was calculated.
ANOVA, stratified for age and gender, followed by Tukey's
multiple comparison test, was used to compare mean intakes by
income-week (Hatcher and Stepanski 1994
). Mean intakes
of the number of food servings for each of the food groups of Canada's
food guide to healthy eating (Health and Welfare Canada
1992
) were compared to minimum recommended intake levels for
each food group. To investigate the relationship between overall intake
of nutrients and correlates of intake, continuous variables were
analyzed using multiple regressions. Change in energy and nutrient
intake (from income-week 1 to income-week 4) was divided into
quintiles; the association of these quintiles with sociodemographic
variables was assessed using the chi-square test of independence. To
assess whether greater day-to-day variability in energy intake was
associated with different levels of intake of any of the
micronutrients, the mean intakes per energy variability quintile were
compared using ANOVA. Differences at the level of P < 0.05 were considered significant. Statistics were generated using
SAS/STAT 6.11 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A total of 60% or 490/816 clients approached were enrolled,
57.2% of women and 62.9% of men. Sociodemographic data obtained upon
enrollment are described elsewhere (Jacobs Starkey et al. 1998
). Briefly, clients' mean age was 41 y with mean body
mass index
(BMI)3
of 27 ± 11 (kg/m2); 43% were born in
Canada. The most common regions of origin for non-Canadian clients were
Eastern Europe, South America, and the Caribbean. Refugees represented
16% of clients enrolled in the study. Weekly or biweekly food bank
visits were reported by 36.9% of clients.
All four 24-h recall interviews were completed by 428 (87.3%) subjects (219 men and 209 women): 23 from small, 89 from medium, and 316 from large food assistance sites. Among these food assistance recipients, men and women were equally represented (51.2 and 48.8%, respectively); 77.6% were in the 1849-y-old age group; 63.1% were single, separated, or widowed; and 66.6% had completed high school or post-secondary studies. Twice as many men as women (49.2 vs. 27.4%) had a technical, college, or university education. The total number of people fed in a household (mean 2.4 ± 1.5) was higher when women versus men presented themselves at the food bank (P < 0.0001), 2.8 ± 1.6 versus 2.1 ± 1.4, respectively. Eighty-three percent of food bank users who completed the study received income as social assistance benefits.
Of the 62 dropouts from the study, 59.7% were men. In comparison to the completing adults, dropouts were younger (mean age 38 vs. 41 y, P < 0.05), lived in smaller households (2.2 ± 1.4 vs. 2.4 ± 1.6, P < 0.05), and shopped more often for food (4.5 ± 2.8 vs. 3.4 ± 2.7 times per week, P < 0.05) than clients who completed the study. Dropouts also reported spending more on smoking ($9.33 ± 10.38 vs. $6.01 ± 9.84, P < 0.01).
Dietary intake status and energy intakes.
Energy intakes (means of 4 d) (Table 1
) of male and female food bank clients were similar to the general
Quebec population (Santé Québec 1995
).
Further, whereas the vast majority of people received money once a
month as a social assistance check, there was no decline in mean energy
intake over the income-month (Table 2
). Mean energy intake varied with age and gender (P < 0.01) in the expected directions, being higher for men and the
younger food bank clients. Whereas energy intake variation was high, as
evidenced by large standard deviations, it is unlikely that the food
bank users chronically lacked enough to eat. Self-reported
height-weight data indicated that <6% of subjects had a BMI below 20,
66% between 2027, and 28% had a BMI
28
kg/m2. There could be a concern that food bank
users, entering the study in any income-week, would report lower
intakes in later interviews as a result of interview fatigue thus
obscuring trends over the month. There were no differences in energy
intakes analyzed by visit (week-by-week from the time people entered
the study, regardless of income-week).
|
|
To further examine the week-to-week variability in energy intake, quintiles of the coefficient of variation of energy intake were formed (data not shown). There were no differences in the mean (4 d) energy intake by quintile of variation in energy intake. For men, mean energy intake at the lowest quintile of variability (13%) was 10.2 MJ, similar to the 10.4 MJ obtained by those with the highest variability in energy intake (65%). Multivariate analysis of the correlates of variability in energy intake indicated that the week-to-week variability in energy intake was higher among smokers (P < 0.002) and among Canadian-born clients (P < 0.02) and lower when more people usually ate together (P < 0.004). Age and gender were not associated with variability of intake. The correlates of variability of intake from week-to-week appeared to reflect lifestyle, whereas the correlates of mean energy intake over the 4-wk period were age and sex, indicators of biological variability between subjects.
Food group servings.
The proportion of food bank users who met the minimum recommended
number of servings from Canada's food guide to healthy eating
(Health and Welfare Canada 1992
) (Table 3
) was similar to the general Quebec population (Santé
Québec 1995
). The proportion of clients who met minimum
intake recommendations for milk products was lower than for Quebecers
in general; only 32.5% of Quebecers and 21% of food bank clients met
the recommended intakes. Mean intake of milk products (data not shown)
was below the recommended minimum of two servings for all age and sex
groups; mean intakes of the other three food groups exceeded the
recommended minimum number of servings.
|
With the exception of calcium, mean nutrient intakes (4 recalls) (Table 1)
met the Recommended Nutrient Intakes (RNI), levels thought to meet
the needs of most healthy people (Murray and Beare-Rogers 1990
). Mean calcium intakes were below the RNI for women aged
1849 y and both men and women aged 50+ years. Analysis of food group
data support these observations (Table 3)
.
Mean nutrient intakes by income-week (Table 2)
showed very little
change over the month; nutrient intake was not influenced by how close
clients were to their next check. It is possible that our participants
obtained food bank provisions before running out of food, thus
maintaining a stable intake over the weeks. ANOVA revealed an effect
for income-week only for one nutrient, calcium [F(3,1272) = 3.08;
P < 0.03]. Calcium intake was not consistent over
time; during weeks 1 and 3 intakes were significantly lower than during
weeks 2 and 4 (P < 0.04) for all age and sex groups.
Mean nutrient intake was also not different by quintile of energy intake variability; those people with the most erratic daily eating pattern obtained micronutrients similar to their more energy-consistent peers.
Correlates of nutrient intake.
Multivariate correlates of nutrient intake were identified (Table 4
). Overall intakes (means of 4 d) were regressed on the linear
combination of age, sex, country of origin, education level, civil
status, number of people fed, frequency of using the food bank,
telephone costs, rent payment, and smoking. Civil status and rent
payment showed no relationship to nutrient intake (P >
0.05) and were deleted from the final models. As expected, men had a
higher intake than women for energy (2.1 MJ) and all nutrients, with
the exception of vitamins A and C. Food bank clients not born in Canada
(58.8% of subjects) had higher intakes of folate (P <
0.0002) and vitamin C (P < 0.001). Similarly,
education was positively associated with intake of folate
(P < 0.008), vitamin C (P < 0.01),
and vitamin A (P < 0.001).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The 60% enrollment success in this study compares favorably with other
large scale studies in Canada (69%) and the United States (61%)
(Santé Québec 1995
; US Department of
Health and Human Services and US Department of Agriculture
1986
). The <13% dropout rate over four contacts was not
unreasonable.
Mean energy intakes below recommended levels (Murray and Beare-Rogers 1990
), such as we found for food bank users, was
also reported by Badun et al (1995)
in a low-income group in Ontario
and by Dowler and Calvert (1995)
among lone-parents in Britain.
Nonetheless, our study participants did not have low mean BMI. Although
Kendall et al (1996)
hypothesized that occasional bingeing behaviors
may predispose food-insecure individuals to obesity, we found the
distribution of BMI among food bank users to be similar to the general
Quebec population (Santé Québec 1995
) .
The mean of four 24-h dietary recalls is considered valid to represent
the overall nutrient intake of a group (Bingham 1991
).
Mean energy intakes in this study were higher than reported in other
low-income groups, for example, by Crotty et al (1992)
using weighed
food records and by Dowler and Calvert (1995)
using two 24-hour
recalls. Energy intakes reported in the NHANES III report
(US Department of Health and Human Services
1994) and in the Quebec Nutrition Survey
(Santé Québec 1995
) were similar to those in
the present study for women and older men. Men aged 1849 y in both of
these surveys had higher mean energy intakes than food bank users;
however, the low income subgroup in the Quebec survey had lower energy
intakes than food bank users (US Department of Health and Human
Services 1994, Santé Québec 1995
).
Peterkin et al (1982)
reported that food stamp program participants in
the US meet the recommended daily allowance (RDA) for calcium, iron,
magnesium, vitamin A, thiamin, and vitamin C less often than their
nonpoor peers. Badun et al (1995)
also found calcium, folate, and zinc
intake of a small sample of Canadian low-income people to be below
recommended levels. Although Levine (1996)
found that economic
resources are a determinant of zinc status, in our study zinc intake by
food bank users was higher in most age/sex groups than that reported in
two Quebec surveys (Ghadirian et al. 1995
,
Santé Québec 1995
). Lower zinc intakes
(<7.5 mg/d) were found for lower income participants in NHANES II,
which were attributed to food selection rather than a low energy intake
(Mares-Perlman et al. 1995
). These latter results are
supported by analysis of Canadian family food expenditure data:
Campbell and Horton (1991)
found an increased proportion of households
with lower protein, iron, folate, and calcium levels among those with
lower income. Interpretation of iron intake data must also consider
food source. Gibson (1994)
, upon reporting a study where 44% of iron
came from pasta, rice, cereal and bread, cautioned that meal
composition may be an important variable for study in vulnerable
groups. Given that over 70% of the food bank users had mean meat &
alternatives food group intake above the minimum recommended number of
servings, their mean zinc and iron intakes above RNI levels were not
unexpected.
Mean intakes of folate, vitamin C, iron, thiamin, zinc, and vitamin A
were higher in the present study than recently reported for other
low-income groups (Crotty et al. 1992
, Dowler and Calvert 1995
, Santé Québec 1995
).
Fruit and vegetable intake (important for sources of folate) is related
to both income (Myres and Kroetsch 1978
) and education
(Rogers et al 1995
). Low-income women in Maryland
reported spending little time on cooking and revealed barriers to fruit
and vegetable consumption as preference for other food, time and effort
required, perishability, and cost (Trieman et al.,
1996
). Given the declining earnings of young men and increasing
income gaps between higher- and lower-income Canadians
(Morissette 1997
), the challenge to have an adequate
food budget is likely to affect even more people in the future. Stitt et al. (1995)
found a 53% difference in the regularity of fresh fruit
and vegetable consumption when comparing high and low income groups in
Britain. Education level reported in our study group was reflected in
mean folate intakes meeting recommended levels, except among older men.
Food bank users in this study who were not born in Canada had higher
folate intakes; this may reflect a greater consumption of raw food or
of meals that require cooking from raw ingredients. Dowler and Calvert (1995)
found that nonwhite respondents' higher nutrient intake could
be related to a greater dietary diversity; a more consistent habit of
cooking from fresh, raw ingredients; and a less likelihood of smoking.
Diets with higher diversity scores are more likely to meet nutrient
intake recommendations, and diet diversity is associated with higher
income and education (Kant et al. 1991
).
Heavy smoking has been reported to be negatively associated with
attitudes about healthy eating (Smith et al. 1997
). From
7-d weighed food records of British adults, Margetts and Jackson (1993)
determined that, while there was little difference in total food energy
between smokers and nonsmokers, the smokers had lower fiber, iron,
carotene, and ascorbic acid intakes. Our results among low-income
smokers show a similar pattern.
Mean calcium intake of participants in this study was below levels
reported for French Canadian men and women (Ghadirian et al. 1995
), for low-income men (Myres and Kroetsch 1978
), and for adult women entering a food bank study
(Villalon 1998
). Intakes of men and women aged 50+ y
were similar to those reported in the Quebec Nutrition Survey, while
younger food bank users had intakes below their provincial age
counterparts (Santé Québec 1995
). Low-income
Quebecers' mean intake of calcium (Santé Québec
1995
) was similar to that of the food bank users in this study.
In an early study of food stamp program participants in the US,
Peterkin et al. (1982)
reported that households meeting the RDA for
calcium consumed more milk, vegetables, and grain products, an area for
further investigation among young food bank clients. The need to
augment emergency food supplies with milk products was previously
documented (Jacobs Starkey 1994
).
Comparative data on variability in nutrient intake are limited. The
coefficient of variation for energy intake of male food bank users aged
1849 y was higher than reported by Beaton et al. (1979)
(47.3 vs.
35.8%, respectively), as was the variability for six other nutrients:
protein, fat, calcium, iron, thiamin, and vitamin C. Using the example
of calcium variability in adults, that of food bank users (76.4%) was
similar to low income Quebecers (72.4%) and higher than that reported
in the US (49.7%) (Beaton et al. 1983
,
Santé Québec 1995
). The response of
within-person variance to both environmental and biological pressures
(Tarasuk and Beaton 1991
) is at play. It may be that the
high variation in food bank users' intake protects, in the short term,
from overall low intakes.
Food bank users in this study most often reported use of the food bank
as a community service (Jacobs Starkey et al. 1998
), had
a fixed address, and were able to carry the provisions received. The
homeless and other poor groups who are less mobile, such as single
parents with large families and the frail elderly, are not well
represented by these data.
The nutrient intake of adult food bank users is not worse than the general Quebec population. Energy intake was sufficient and was unrelated to clients' social circumstances. Five important correlates of nutrient intake in the study population were determined: frequency of food bank use, household size, smoking, education, and country of birth. These data may be important to health professionals to target nutrition information and intervention activities with food bank clients.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
2 Abbreviations used: BMI, body mass index; RE,
retinol equavalents; RDA, recommended daily allowance; RNI, recommended
nutrient intakes. ![]()
Manuscript received July 23, 1998. Initial review completed September 24, 1998. Revision accepted December 22, 1998.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Anderson S. A. Core indicators of nutritional status in difficult-to-sample populations. J. Nutr. 1990;120(suppl. 11):1559-1600
2. Badun C., Evers S., Hooper M. Food security and nutritional concerns of parents in an economically disadvantaged community. J. Can. Diet Assoc. 1995;56:75-80
3. Beaton G. H., Milner J., Corey P., Cousins M., Stewart E., deRamos M., Hewitt D., Grambsch P. V., Kassim N., Little J. A. Sources of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: Implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1979;32:2456-2559
4.
Beaton G. H., Milner J., McGuire V., Feather T. E., Little J. A. Source of variance in 24-hour dietary recall data: Implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Carbohydrate sources, vitamins, and minerals. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1983;37:986-995
5. Bingham S. A. Assessment of food consumption and nutrient intake. Current intake. Margetts B. M. Nelson M. eds. Design Concepts in Nutritional Epidemiology 1991:154-191 Oxford University Press Toronto, Canada.
6. Black A. E., Prentice A. M., Goldberg G. R., Jebb S. A., Bingham S. A., Livingstone M.B.E., Coward W. A. Measurements of total energy expenditure provide insights into the validity of dietary measurements of energy intake. J. Am. Diet Assoc. 1993;93:572-579[Medline]
7. Campbell C. C., Horton S. E. Apparent nutrient intake of Canadians: Continuing nutritional challenges for public health professionals. Can. J. Public Health 1991;82:374-380[Medline]
8. Canadian Association of Food Banks.(1997)Hunger Count 1997. A Report on Emergency Food Assistance in Canada. Toronto: ON; Canadian Association of Food Banks.
9. Crotty P. A., Rutishauser I.H.E., Cahill M. Food in low-income families. Aust. J. Public Health 1992;16:168-174[Medline]
10. Davis B., Tarasuk V. Hunger in Canada. Agr. Human Values 1994;11:58-57
11. Dowler E., Calvert C. Nutrition and diet in lone-parent families in London 1995 Family Policies Study Centre London.
12. Emmons L. Food procurement and the nutritional adequacy of diets in low-income families. J. Am. Diet Assoc. 1986;86:1684-1693[Medline]
13. Food and Agriculture Organization World Declaration on Nutrition/The International Conference on Nutrition. Food Nutr. Agr. 1995;13/14:2-3
14. Ghadirian P., Shatenstein B., Lambert J., Thouez J. P., PetitClerc C., Parent M-E., Mailhot M., Goulet M-C. Food habits of French Canadians in Montreal, Quebec. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 1995;14:37-45[Abstract]
15. Gibson R. Iron concerns in Canada. NIN Rev #22. Rapport Suppl 1994;9:1-3
16. Goldberg G. R., Black A. E., Jebb S. A., Cole T. J., Murgatroyd P. R., Coward W. A., Prentice A. M. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: 1. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991;45:569-581[Medline]
17. Hargrove D., Dewolfe J., Thompson L. Food security: What the community wants. Learning through focus groups. J. Can. Diet Assoc. 1994;55:188-191[Medline]
18. Hatcher L., Stepanski E. J. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Univariate and Multivariate Statistics 1994 SAS Institute Inc Cary, NC.
19. Health and Welfare Canada.(1992)Food Guide Facts. Background for Educators and Communicators. Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, Canada. Cat. H-3925312.
20. Jacobs Starkey L. An evaluation of emergency food bags. J. Can. Diet Assoc. 1994;55:175-178
21. Jacobs Starkey L., Kuhnlein H. V. Nutrient adequacy of urban food assistance provisions. J. Am. Diet Assoc. 1996;96: Suppl:A-55(abstr.)
22. Jacobs Starkey L., Kuhnlein H. V., Gray-Donald K. Food bank users: Sociodemographic and nutritional characteristics. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 1998;158:1143-1149[Abstract]
23. Jacobs Starkey L., Murphy S., Bertrand L., Cossette M., Desrosiers Choquette J., Duquette M-, P. & Leduc Gauvin J. Summary Report: Ad Hoc Committee on Hunger and Food Security, Montreal, 19921994. J. Can. Diet Assoc. 1995;56:110-112
24. Kant A. K., Block G., Schatzin A., Ziegler R. G., Nestle M. Dietary diversity in the US population, NHANES II, 19761980. J Amer. Diet Assoc. 1991;91:1526-1531
25. Kendall A., Kennedy E. Position of the American dietetic association: Domestic food and nutrition security. J. Am. Diet Assoc. 1998;98:337-342[Medline]
26. Kendall A., Olson C. M., Frongillo E. A. Relationship of hunger and food insecurity to food availability and consumption. J. Am. Diet Assoc. 1996;96:1019-1024[Medline]
27. Lee R. D., Nieman D. C., Rainwater M. Comparison of eight microcomputer dietary analysis programs with the USDA Nutrient Data Base for standard reference. J. Am. Diet Assoc. 1995;95:858-867[Medline]
28.
Levine B. S. Most frequently asked questions
about zinc. Nutr. Today 1996;31:171-172
29. Mares-Perlman J. A., Subar A. F., Block G., Greger J. L., Luby M. H. Zinc intake and sources in the US adult population: 19761980. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 1995;14:349-357[Abstract]
30. Margetts B. M., Jackson A. A. Interactions between people's diet and their smoking habits: The dietary and nutritional survey of British adults. Br. Med. J. 1993;307:1381-1384
31.
Minister of National Health and Welfare.(1990)Action Toward
Healthy Eating
Canada's Guidelines for Healthy Eating and
Recommended Strategies for Implementation. Health and Welfare Canada,
Ottawa, Canada.
32. Morissette R. Declining earnings of young men. Can. Soc. Trends 1997;46:8-12
33. Murray T. K., Beare-Rogers J. L. Nutrition recommendations, 1990. J. Can. Diet Assoc. 1990;51:391-395
34. Myres A. W., Kroetsch D. The influence of family income on food consumption and nutrient intake in Canada. Can. J. Public Health 1978;69:208-221[Medline]
35. Najman J. M. Health and poverty: Past, present and prospects for the future. Soc. Sci. Med. 1993;36:157-166
36. Peterkin B. B., Kerr R. L., Hama M. Y. Nutritional adequacy of diets of low-income households. J. Nutr. Educ. 1982;14:102-104
37. Radimer K. L., Olson C. M., Campbell C. C. Development of indicators to assess hunger. J. Nutr. 1990;120:1544-1548
38. Riches G. Food banks, hunger and economic growth: Charity or collective social security in the 1990s?. NIN Rapport 1989;4:5
39. Rogers M.A.M., Simon D. G., Zucker L. B., Mackessy J. S., Newman-Palmer N. B. Indicators of poor dietary habits in a high risk population. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 1995;14:159-164[Abstract]
40. Santé Québec, Bertrand, L., ed.(1995)Les Québecoises et les Québecois mangent-ils mieux? Rapport de l'Enquêate québecoise sur la nutrition, 1990. Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux, gouvernement du Québec., Montréal, Québec.
41. Smith P. K., Hoerr S. L. A comparison of current food bank users, non-users and past users in a population of low income single mothers. J. Nutr. Educ. 1992;24:59S-66S
42. Smith M. J., Johnson R. K., Wang M. Q. The association between smoking and the diet and health attitudes, awareness, and knowledge of low-income parents. Fam. Econ. Nutr. Rev. 1997;10:16-25
43. Stitt S., O'Connell C., Grant D. Old, poor & malnourished. Nutr. Health 1995;10:135-154[Medline]
44.
Tarasuk V., Beaton G. H. The nature and individuality of with-in subject variation in energy intake. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991;54:464-470
45. Tarasuk V., MacLean H. The food problems of low-income single mothers: An ethnographic study. Can. Home Econ. J. 1990;40:76-82
46.
Taren D. L., Clark W., Chernesky M., Quirk E. Weekly food servings and participation in social programs among low income families. Am. J. Public Health 1990;80:1376-1378
47. Treiman K., Freimuth V., Damron D., Lasswell A., Anliker J., Havas S., Langenberg P., Feldman R. Attitudes and behaviors related to fruits and vegetables among low-income women in the WIC program. J. Nutr. Educ. 1996;28:149-156
48. US Department of Health and Human Services and US Department of Agriculture.(1986)Nutrition Monitoring in the United States. A Progress Report from the Joint Nutrition Monitoring Evaluation Committee. DHHS Pub No (PHS) 861255: Public Health Service, US Govt. Printing Office, Washington, DC.
49. Villalon L. Comptoir alimentaire de Mapleton, Nouveau-Brunswick. Profil sociodemographique et alimentaire des beneficiaires. Can. J. Diet Prac. Res. 1998;59:75-82
50. Vozenilek G. P. Dietetics in the fight against domestic hunger. J. Am. Diet Assoc. 1998;98:266, 268-266, 269
51. Wolfe W. S., Olson C. M., Kendall A., Frongillo E. A. Jr Understanding food insecurity in the elderly: A conceptual framework. J. Nutr. Educ. 1996;28:92-100
52. World Health Organization. (1985)Energy and Protein Requirements. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation. Technical Report Series 724. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. I. Kirkpatrick and V. Tarasuk Food Insecurity Is Associated with Nutrient Inadequacies among Canadian Adults and Adolescents J. Nutr., March 1, 2008; 138(3): 604 - 612. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Tarasuk, L. McIntyre, and J. Li Low-Income Women's Dietary Intakes Are Sensitive to the Depletion of Household Resources in One Month J. Nutr., August 1, 2007; 137(8): 1980 - 1987. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||