Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanden Heuvel, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vanden Heuvel, J. P.
(Journal of Nutrition. 1999;129:575-580.)
© 1999 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Supplement

Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptors: A Critical Link among Fatty Acids, Gene Expression and Carcinogenesis

John P. Vanden Heuvel

Department of Veterinary Science and Center for Molecular Toxicology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PEROXISOME...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PPAR-REGULATED GENES
 EFFECTS OF GROWTH FACTOR...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
It has been known for many years that long-chain fatty acids derived from endogenous metabolism and/or nutrition can act as second messengers and regulators of cell signaling pathways. For example, fatty acids regulate the activity of protein kinase C (PKC) in a mechanism distinct from activation by diacylglycerol. Like PKC activators such as phorbol esters, essential fatty acids activate PKC and in doing so modulate the activity of growth factor receptors such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Unsaturated fatty acids can inhibit GTPase activating protein, thereby quenching signals from p21-ras. These studies have shown that fatty acids can influence numerous signaling pathways and that these small lipophilic substances may be ancient second messengers. Fatty acids are also known modulators of the carcinogenic process, showing distinct tissue-specific pro- or anticancer effects. However, the reason for such a dichotomous effect on cellular processes has not been adequately described. In this article, the inclusion of a steroid hormone receptor–signaling pathway in mediating fatty acids' effects will be summarized. This signaling molecule has been deemed the peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR) and has been extensively examined in regard to its response to xenobiotic, fatty acid-like chemicals (peroxisome proliferators, PP). PP, like fatty acids, activate PPAR and modulate tissue-specific responses. The goal of this review is to describe a potential role for PPAR in mediating the effects of fatty acids on gene expression, cell growth, differentiation and apoptosis.


KEY WORDS: • peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor • conjugated linoleic acid • (n-3) fatty acids • peroxisome proliferators • cancer


    PEROXISOME PROLIFERATOR–ACTIVATED RECEPTORS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PEROXISOME...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PPAR-REGULATED GENES
 EFFECTS OF GROWTH FACTOR...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
The discovery of a novel steroid hormone receptor that was activated by fatty acid–like chemicals called peroxisome proliferators (PP) (Issemann and Green 1990Citation ) has added yet another signaling molecule to the arsenal utilized by fatty acids and their metabolites. Due to the initial characterization of activation by xenobiotics, these receptors were named peroxisome proliferator–activated receptors (PPAR). PPAR could have easily been labeled as fatty acid receptors because these proteins are activated by PP as well as endogenous fatty acids (reviewed in Latruffe and Vamecq 1997Citation ). Similar to other steroid hormone receptors, PPAR are ligand-activated transcription factors that control gene expression by interacting with specific DNA response elements (PPRE) located upstream of responsive genes (Tugwood et al. 1992Citation ). Genes containing PPRE motifs include acyl-CoA oxidase (ACO), peroxisomal bifunctional enzyme, liver fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP), and microsomal CYP4A, a cytochrome P450 fatty acid {omega}-hydroxylase (reviewed in Belury et al. 1998Citation ). In addition to these lipid metabolism enzymes, peroxisome proliferators regulate the expression of several growth regulatory genes (Ledwith et al. 1993Citation ), as will be discussed in more detail below. The battery of genes regulated by fatty acids and PP is critical to their effects on lipid metabolism, cellular differentiation and ultimately cancer (see Fig. 1).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Basic mechanism of action of peroxisome proliferator–activated receptors (PPAR). The steroid hormone receptor, PPAR, is activated by a variety of ligands and binds to the PPAR-response element (PPRE), driving the transcription of target genes. The resultant change in gene expression is responsible for effects on lipid metabolism (i.e., increased peroxisomal enzymes) as well as on growth regulation. Depending on the cell type being examined, PPAR activation and regulation of growth regulatory and immediate early genes result in proliferation, apoptosis or differentiation. Abbreviations: ACO, fatty acyl-CoA oxidase; LT, leukotriene; PG, prostaglandin; PP, peroxisome proliferators.

 
The cloning of three distinct PPAR from xenopus (Dreyer et al. 1992Citation ), led to the realization that a subfamily of these receptors existed. Currently, the subfamily has been defined as PPAR{alpha}, PPARß (also called PPAR{delta} and NUC1) and PPAR{gamma}. The potency of various chemicals to activate PPAR is subtype specific, and the expression of PPAR{alpha}, ß and {gamma} varies widely from tissue to tissue. In numerous cell types of ectodermal, mesodermal or endodermal origin, PPAR are coexpressed, although their concentration relative to each other varies widely (Braissant et al. 1996Citation ). PPAR{alpha} is highly expressed in hepatocytes, cardiomyocytes, enterocytes and the proximal tubule cells of kidney. PPARß is expressed ubiquitously and often at higher levels than PPAR{alpha} and {gamma}. PPAR{gamma} is expressed predominantly in adipose tissue and the immune system and exists as two distinct forms {gamma}1 and {gamma}2, which arise by differential transcription start sites and alternative splicing (Fajas et al. 1997Citation ). The distinct tissue distribution suggests that the PPAR subtypes play different biological roles. In fact, it is widely believed that of the different subtypes, PPAR{alpha} predominates in hepatic lipid metabolism and PPAR{gamma} plays a pivotal role in adipogenesis and immune responses. There is also evidence to support the role of PPAR in cell growth and differentiation, which will be discussed subsequently.


    PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS "MODEL" FATTY ACIDS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PEROXISOME...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PPAR-REGULATED GENES
 EFFECTS OF GROWTH FACTOR...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
As mentioned above, many PP and fatty acids are PPAR activators. The xenobiotic peroxisome proliferators, such as the fibrate hypolipidemic drugs, are structurally similar to endogenous and dietary fatty acids and their metabolites (see Fig. 2 ),containing a carboxylic acid functional group and a hydrophobic tail. The term "activator" denotes a chemical with the ability to convert PPAR into a transcriptional active complex. The most common means to examine activation is through the use of reporter assays. As shown in Figure 3 ,a variety of fatty acids and fatty acid analogs are as efficacious as the xenobiotic PP in activating PPAR.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR) ligands and activators. Shown are synthetic PPAR ligands such as Wy14,643 and clofibric acid as well as natural ligands such as conjugated linoleic acid, arachidonic acid and prostaglandin J2. Most of the peroxisome proliferators have a carboxylic acid group and a large hydrophobic domain.

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Activation of peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR) by peroxisome proliferators and fatty acids. A rat hepatoma cell line (FaO) was stably transfected with a peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE)-luciferase reporter gene. The cell line was treated with 100 µmol/L of the different chemicals for 4 h before harvesting and luciferase measurement. Data are normalized for protein concentration and expressed relative to DMSO (vehicle)-treated controls as a fold induction (DMSO control = 1; n = 3). Abbreviations used: DMSO, dimethylsulfoxide; Wy, Wy14,643; Bz, bezafibrate; TZD, troglitazone; PFDA, perfluorodecanoic acid; ETYA, 5,8,11,14-eicosatetraynoic acid; CLA, conjugated linoleic acid (e, trans; z, cis) ; DHA, docasahexaenoic acid.

 
Until recently, there has been some debate on the question whether PP and fatty acids activate PPAR through a direct, physical interaction. However, most receptor activators have been demonstrated to bind to PPAR subtypes with reasonable affinity. For example, certain mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids bind directly to PPAR{alpha} and PPAR{gamma} at physiologic concentrations (Kliewer et al. 1997Citation ). The eicosanoid 8(S)-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid is a PPAR{alpha} ligand, whereas 15-deoxy-{Delta}12,14-prostaglandin J2 specifically associates with PPAR{gamma} (Kliewer et al. 1995 and 1997Citation Citation ). The chemotactic agent leukotriene B4 and the hypolipidemic drug Wy 14,643 are specific PPAR ligands (Brown et al. 1997Citation ). It appears that the question whether PPAR should be classified as "orphan receptors" is no longer a point of contention.

Therefore, fatty acids and xenobiotic PP share the ability to bind to and activate various PPAR subtypes. The genes that are regulated by PP and fatty acids are essentially identical (Ledwith et al. 1996Citation ). From an experimental standpoint, PP have the advantage of undergoing fewer metabolic processes and are generally more potent than endogenous fatty acids (Krey et al. 1997Citation ). In the remaining discussion, PP will be used to typify the effects of fatty acids on gene expression and hence more complicated processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation and apoptosis.


    PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS REGULATORS OF CELLULAR GROWTH/DIFFERENTIATION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PEROXISOME...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PPAR-REGULATED GENES
 EFFECTS OF GROWTH FACTOR...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
Peroxisome proliferators as hepatic mitogens.

A theory that has been gaining favor over recent years is that peroxisome proliferators, and possibly other tumor promoters and fatty acids, cause cancer by altering the expression of a particular subset of genes that in turn affects the rate of proliferation of cells. Support for this theory includes the induction by PP of growth regulatory genes such as c-myc, c-Ha-ras, fos, jun and egr-1 (Cherkaoui Malki et al. 1990Citation , Ledwith et al. 1993 and 1996Citation Citation ). Compared with other growth regulators, the profile of PP-induced gene expression was most similar to that induced by arachidonic acid and eicosatetraynoic acid. Fatty acid– or PP-induced expression of growth regulatory genes precedes entry of the cell into S phase (Ledwith et al. 1996Citation ). The most convincing data regarding a PPAR-cell proliferation-tumor promotion connection come from the PPAR{alpha}-null mouse model system (Lee et al. 1995Citation ). Remarkably, the mice that lack PPAR{alpha} do not display the typical pleiotropic response, such as hepatomegaly, peroxisome proliferation and transcriptional-activation of target genes, when challenged with PP (Lee et al. 1995Citation ). These mice display abnormal lipid homeostasis (Aoyama et al. 1998Citation ), including fatty acid metabolism (Peters et al. 1997bCitation ). Importantly, in PPAR{alpha} null mice fed the PP Wy-14,643 in diet, there was no increase in hepatic cell proliferation (Peters et al. 1997aCitation ), in stark contrast to the wild-type mice. After 11 mo of consuming Wy14,643, 100% of the wild-type mice had multiple hepatocellular neoplasms, including adenomas and carcinomas, whereas the PPAR{alpha}-null mice were unaffected. This work demonstrates that the effects of Wy-14,643 on replicative DNA synthesis and hepatocarcinogenesis are mediated by PPAR{alpha} (Peters et al. 1997aCitation ).

PPAR and apoptosis.

Consistent with role of PP as hepatic tumor promoters, these chemicals decrease the rate of programmed cell death (Bayly et al. 1994Citation , Roberts 1996Citation ), thereby altering the balance between mitosis/apoptosis, a key mechanism in carcinogenesis (Roberts et al. 1997Citation ). Recently, PPAR{alpha} has been shown to be an essential component of repression by PP of cell death (Roberts et al. 1998Citation ). These researchers showed that overexpression of a dominant negative PPAR{alpha} (thereby abolishing PPAR{alpha} activity) increases apoptosis in guinea pig liver.

PPAR as a master regulator of differentiation.

PPAR have been clearly established to be involved in differentiation of several cell types. The wide variety of cells that can be induced to differentiate with PP, fatty acids, thiazolidinediones and other PPAR ligands suggest that this subfamily of proteins can be termed "master regulators" of differentiation. This classification is reserved for genes that specify the fate of a particular cell, such as transcription factors capable of activating the program of differentiation (Granneman et al. 1998Citation ). PPAR have been shown to induce differentiation of adipocytes (Spiegelman et al. 1997Citation ), oligodendrocytes (Granneman et al. 1998Citation ), myoblasts (Grimaldi et al. 1997Citation ), keratinocytes (Hanley et al. 1998Citation ) and monocyte/macrophages (Tontonoz et al. 1998Citation ). The role of PPAR{gamma} in differentiation has been the most widely studied and demonstrates its role as a master regulator. Ectopic expression of PPAR{gamma} in fibroblasts regulated development of the adipose lineage in response to endogenous lipid activators (Tontonoz et al. 1994Citation ). That is, expression and activation of PPAR{gamma} is sufficient to result in a phenotypic change in fibroblasts. Also, ligand activation of PPAR{gamma} is sufficient to induce growth arrest in fibroblasts (Altiok et al. 1997Citation ), a key step in committing a cell to differentiate.

Could PPAR-dependent differentiation be responsible for anticarcinogenicity?

The ability of PP to increase differentiation is not associated with increased cancer risk and in most instances would be considered beneficial. A growing number of peroxisome proliferators, fatty acids and other PPAR ligands have anticancer effects in extrahepatic tissues. For example, the aromatic fatty acid phenylacetate and its analogs induce tumor cytostasis and differentiation in experimental models (Pineau et al. 1996Citation ). The relative potency of certain drugs to activate human PPAR{alpha} correlated with drug-induced cytostasis in human prostate carcinoma, melanoma and glioblastoma cell lines. Also, a dietary fatty acid with anticancer effects in skin, mammary, colon and stomach, conjugated linoleic acid (CLA; reviewed in Belury and Vanden Heuvel 1997Citation ), is a potent PPAR{alpha} activator (Belury et al. 1997Citation ).

Many fatty acids that activate PPAR (Fig. 3) have been demonstrated to be either anticancer or prodifferentiation in various animal and cellular models. Polyunsaturated fatty acids such as docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) as well as dietary lipids such as CLA and lipoic acid have received the most attention. A brief summary of fatty acids with anticancer properties is shown in Table 1 .The paradoxical antitumor effects of peroxisome proliferators and these fatty acids may be attributed to their effects on differentiation at the expense of cell replication. A direct connection between the anticarcinogenicity of chemicals such as CLA, DHA and EPA with PPAR activation requires further study. However, the connection is intriguing and may help explain the isomer-, tissue- and sex-specific inhibition of tumors that has been observed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Fatty acids with anticancer or prodifferentiation effects that are also known peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor activators

 

    PPAR-REGULATED GENES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PEROXISOME...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PPAR-REGULATED GENES
 EFFECTS OF GROWTH FACTOR...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
As described above, it is through altered gene expression that peroxisome proliferators, fatty acids and PPAR are able to regulate such diverse effects as cell proliferation, differentiation or apoptosis. Although most genes known to be regulated by these chemicals are involved in fatty acid metabolism (reviewed in Schoonjans et al. 1997Citation ), there are several PP-responsive genes with a link to cell cycle control. Induction of the oncogenes c-Ha-ras, jun and c-myc by PP has been reported and the ability to induce these genes correlates well with tumor-promoting potential (Ledwith et al. 1993, 1996 and 1997Citation Citation Citation , Rokos and Ledwith 1997Citation ). For example, the tumor promoters Wy14,643, clofibrate, ciprofibrate and DEHP were inducers of c-fos, c-jun, junB egr-1, and NUP475 whereas the noncarcinogenic PP dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) was ineffective (Ledwith et al. 1996Citation ). In addition, an immediate early gene (IEG) critically involved in lipid metabolism, tumor promotion and inflammation, cyclooxygenase-2, is also regulated by PP (Ledwith et al. 1997Citation ). IEG are key genes involved in regulating the cell cycle and are characterized by rapid response to mitogens as well as serum and cycloheximide (CHX) inducibility (Gashler and Sukhatme 1995Citation ). Our laboratory has recently identified and cloned a novel IEG involved in neuronal differentiation, rZFP-37, as a PP-regulated gene in rodent liver (Vanden Heuvel et al. 1998Citation ).

Because PPRE motifs have not been observed in the IEG discussed above, how PP regulate their expression is a matter of debate. Some have suggested that PPAR was not a major player in IEG expression because higher doses of a peroxisome proliferator were required to induce c-jun or c-myc than required to induce ACO or CYP4A1 (Ledwith et al. 1996Citation ). However, the involvement of PPAR in regulating IEG expression can be implied from effects of this receptor on differentiation, apoptosis and carcinogenesis. In particular, the fact that the PPAR{alpha}-null mouse has abrogated PP-induced cell proliferation and tumor formation demonstrates that this protein must be involved in regulating key cell-cycle control genes. We have recently shown that PPAR{alpha}-null mice are no longer responsive to peroxisome proliferator–induced c-myc mRNA (Belury et al. 1998Citation ) or rZFP-37 (Vanden Heuvel et al. 1998Citation ). Certainly, the induction of IEG by PP is much more difficult to explain than genes involved in lipid metabolism (Belury et al. 1998Citation ). The convergence of PP with growth factor pathways, in particular the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK; Rokos and Ledwith 1997Citation ) and direct interaction of PPAR with other transcription factors (Sakai et al. 1995Citation ) may explain the complex regulation of IEG by PP. The role of growth factor pathways in affecting PPAR activity is discussed subsequently.


    EFFECTS OF GROWTH FACTOR PATHWAYS ON PPAR ACTIVITY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PEROXISOME...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PPAR-REGULATED GENES
 EFFECTS OF GROWTH FACTOR...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
As stated above, fatty acids are known second messengers that are able to regulate the activity of PKC, ras and growth factor receptors (Bandyopadhyay et al. 1993Citation , Khan et al. 1995Citation , Sumida 1995Citation , Tsai et al. 1989Citation ). We can now add PPAR to this list of signaling molecules affected by these small chemicals. A large number of growth factors including epidermal growth factor (EGF), fibroblast growth factor, tumor necrosis factor-{alpha} (TNF{alpha}), insulin, various interleukins and cytokines regulate gene expression upon binding to membrane-bound tyrosine kinase receptors. Each of these receptors may recruit different signaling molecules to drive expression of IEG and hence alter the phenotype of the target cell. The growth factor–receptor binding results in the generation of activated kinases, which in turn phosphorylate transcription factors involved in immediate early gene expression. There is a growing base of literature regarding growth factors and PPAR activity, in particular TNF{alpha}, insulin and PDGF/EGF. PDGF treatment of adipocytes in culture decreases the transcriptional activity of PPAR{gamma}1 (Camp and Tafuri 1997Citation ). This receptor undergoes EGF-stimulated MAPK kinase (MEK)-dependent phosphorylation and cotransfection of adipocytes with a constitutively active MEK decreased PPAR transcriptional activity. In vitro assays demonstrate that extracellular signal related kinase (ERK2) and c-jun-N-terminal kinase (JNK) are able to phosphorylate PPAR{gamma}2 (Adams et al. 1997Citation ), which may help explain the effects of EGF and TNF{alpha}, respectively, on gene expression. Insulin increases the phosphorylation of PPAR{alpha}, an effect that is associated with increased transcriptional activity (Shalev et al. 1996Citation ). Insulin and a PPAR{gamma} ligand (troglitazone, TZD) act synergistically to increase the expression of an adipocyte-specific gene, aP2 (Zhang et al. 1996Citation ). Transfection with a dominant negative MEK resulted in a decrease in the effects of both insulin and TZD on PPAR{gamma} activity, indicating that MAPK is involved in the cross talk between PPAR and insulin. Finally, pretreatment of ML457 cells with PD98059, an MEK inhibitor, blocks peroxisome proliferator–induced c-fos, egr-1 and junB expression (Rokos and Ledwith 1997Citation ). These data show that PPAR are phosphoproteins that are affected by MAPK and JNK activity.

Most of the studies examining growth factor/PPAR cross talk have focused on the MAPK pathways. However, we have examined the effects of various chemical inhibitors of signaling pathways on PPAR activity and have found other potential cross-talk mechanisms (see Fig. 4 ).For example, PI3K inhibitors wortmannin and LY294002 cause a very dramatic enhancement of PPAR activity. We also have evidence for JNK and CamKII, as well as MAPK, impinging upon PPAR activity. These data are supported by work reported previously (Ledwith et al. 1996Citation ) showing that H7, a protein kinase inhibitor, affected peroxisome proliferator–induced IEG expression. Thapsigargin and A23187 also affected peroxisome proliferator–induced DNA synthesis, suggesting a role of calcium mobilization on IEG expression.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Effect of inhibitors of growth factor signal transduction and peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor (PPAR) activity. An FaO cell line, which stably harbors a peroxisome proliferator response element (PPRE)-luciferase construct, was used to examine the effects of various chemicals on PPAR activity. Cells were pretreated with dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) or the inhibitors for 1 h. Subsequently, the cells were treated with Wy14,643 for 4 h and luciferase was measured. Data are means, n = 3. Abbreviations used: PKC, protein kinase C; MEK, ; JNK, c-jun-N-terminal kinase.

 
Therefore, growth factors, acting through their cognate receptors and regulating signal transduction, play a major role in determining the activity of PPAR and hence the effects of peroxisome proliferators on gene expression. The same may be said presumably of endogenous and dietary fatty acids, i.e., that activity of growth factor and PPAR pathways will determine the cellular response observed, be it differentiation or mitogenesis. The amplification of signals from growth factor receptors by fatty acids has been previously observed, although the mechanism for this effect was suggested to be predominantly via PKC (Bandyopadhyay et al. 1993Citation ). The data presented above suggest that PPAR, similar to PKC, may represent a downstream effector of both fatty acids as well as growth factors.


    SUMMARY
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PEROXISOME...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PPAR-REGULATED GENES
 EFFECTS OF GROWTH FACTOR...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 
Peroxisome proliferator–activated receptors (PPAR) are steroid hormone receptors that are activated by fatty acids, fatty acid metabolites and exogenous peroxisome proliferators (PP). PP are convenient tools to examine the potential mechanism of gene regulation by fatty acids because the former are more potent PPAR activators (Krey et al. 1997Citation ) and undergo less extensive metabolism. Similar to other members of this superfamily of transcription factors, PPAR affects the phenotype of a target cell by regulating a battery of growth regulatory and immediate early genes. PPAR and growth factor signaling processes are highly convergent, which may have an effect on the immediate early gene expression and hence on cellular phenotype. In this review article, we have shown that fatty acids activate PPAR. We have also demonstrated that PPAR is involved in liver carcinogenesis as well as being a "master regulator" of differentiation in extrahepatic tissues. Whether PPAR activation results in proliferation or differentiation may depend on the PPAR subtype as well as other tissue-specific components. However, fatty acids such as CLA, DHA and EPA have anticancer activity in extrahepatic tissues and are known PPAR activators. This raises the possibility that PPAR activation and its subsequent effect on differentiation may explain in part why certain polyunsaturated fatty acids have a beneficial health effect and may also point to future means of intervention in cancer therapy.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Presented at the symposium "Steroid Hormone Receptor and Nutrient Interactions: Implications for Cancer Prevention" as part of Experimental Biology 98, April 18–22, 1998, San Francisco, CA. The symposium was sponsored by the American Society for Nutritional Sciences and was supported in part by educational grants from Loders Croklaan, Inc. and Slimfast Nutrition Institute. Published as a supplement to The Journal of Nutrition. Guest editors for the symposium publication were Diane F. Birt, Iowa State University and Martha Belury, Purdue University. Back

2 Supported in part by grants from Public Health Service-National Institutes of Health (DK49009 and ES07799) Back

3 Abbreviations used: ACO, fatty acyl-CoA oxidase; CLA, conjugated linoleic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; EGF, epidermal growth factor; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; ERK, extracellular signal related kinase; IEG, immediate early gene; JNK, c-jun-N-terminal kinase; L-FAB, liver fatty acid binding protein; MAPK, mitogen activated protein kinase; MEK, MAPK kinase; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; PP, peroxisome proliferators; PPAR, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; TXD, troglitazone. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 PEROXISOME...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PEROXISOME PROLIFERATORS AS...
 PPAR-REGULATED GENES
 EFFECTS OF GROWTH FACTOR...
 SUMMARY
 REFERENCES
 

1. Adams M., Reginato M. J., Shao D., Lazar M. A., Chatterjee V. K.. Transcriptional activation by peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma is inhibited by phosphorylation at a consensus mitogen-activated protein kinase site. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:5128-5132.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Altiok S., Xu M., Spiegelman B. M.. PPARgamma induces cell cycle withdrawalinhibition of E2F/DP DNA-binding activity via down-regulation of PP2A. Genes Dev 1997;11:1987-1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

3. Aoyama T., Peters J. M., Iritani N., Nakajima T., Furihata K., Hashimoto T., Gonzalez F. J.. Altered constitutive expression of fatty acid-metabolizing enzymes in mice lacking the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha). J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:5678-5684.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Bandyopadhyay G. K., Hwang S., Imagawa W., Nandi S.. Role of polyunsaturated fatty acids as signal transducersamplification of signals from growth factor receptors by fatty acids in mammary epithelial cells. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 1993;48:71-78.[Medline]

5. Bayly A. C., Roberts R. A., Dive C.. Suppression of liver cell apoptosis in vitro by the non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogen and peroxisome proliferator nafenopin. J. Cell Biol. 1994;125:197-203.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Beck S. A., Smith K. L., Tisdale M. J.. Anticachectic and antitumor effect of eicosapentaenoic acid and its effect on protein turnover. Cancer Res 1991;51:6089-6093.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Begin M. E., Ells G., Das U. N., Horrobin D. F.. Differential killing of human carcinoma cells supplemented with n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1986;77:1053-1062.

8. Belury M. A., Moya-Camarena S. Y., Liu L.-L., Vanden Heuvel J. P.. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid induces peroxisome-specific enzyme accumulation and ornithine decarboxylase activity in mouse liver. J. Nutr. Biochem. 1997;8:579-584.

9. Belury M. A., Moya-Camarena S. Y., Sun H., Snyder E., Davis J. W., II, Cunningham M. L., Vanden Heuvel J. P.. Comparison of dose-response relationships for induction of lipid metabolizing and growth regulatory genes by peroxisome proliferators in rat liver. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1998;151:254-261.[Medline]

10. Belury M. A., Vanden Heuvel J. P.. Protection against cancer and heart disease by the dietary fat, conjugated linoleic acidpotential mechanisms of action. Nutr. Dis. Update J. 1997;1:58-63.

11. Braissant O., Foufelle F., Scotto C., Dauca M., Wahli W.. Differential expression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs)tissue distribution of PPAR-alpha, -beta, and -gamma in the adult rat. Endocrinology 1996;137:354-366.[Abstract]

12. Brown P. J., Smith-Oliver T. A., Charifson P. S., Tomkinson N. C., Fivush A. M., Sternbach L. E., Wade L., Orband-Miller D. J., Parks S. G., Blanchard S. A., Kliewer J. M., Lehmann D. D., Willson T. M.. Identification of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligands from a biased chemical library [In Process Citation]. Chem. Biol. 1997;4:909-918.[Medline]

13. Camp H. S., Tafuri S. R.. Regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma activity by mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:10811-10816.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

14. Chapkin R. S., Jiang Y. H., Davidson L. A., Lupton J. R.. Modulation of intracellular second messengers by dietary fat during colonic tumor development. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1997;422:85-96.[Medline]

15. Cherkaoui Malki M., Lone Y. C., Corral-Debrinski M., Latruffe N.. Differential proto-oncogene mRNA induction from rats treated with peroxisome proliferators. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1990;173:855-861.[Medline]

16. desBordes C., Lea M. A.. Effects of C18 fatty acid isomers on DNA synthesis in hepatoma and breast cancer cells. Anticancer Res 1995;15:2017-2021.[Medline]

17. Dreyer C., Krey G., Keller H., Givel F., Helftenbein G., Wahli W.. Control of the peroxisomal beta-oxidation pathway by a novel family of nuclear hormone receptors. Cell 1992;68:879-887.[Medline]

18. Fajas L., Auboeuf D., Raspe E., Schoonjans K., Lefebvre A. M., Saladin R., Najib J., Laville M., Fruchart J. C., Deeb S., Vidal-Puig A., Flier J., Briggs M. R., Staels B., Vidal H., Auwerx J.. The organization, promoter analysis, and expression of the human PPARgamma gene. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:18779-18789.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

19. Fuchs J. Packer L. Zimmer G. eds. Lipoic Acid in Health and Disease 1997 Marcel Dekker, Inc New York, NY.. .

20. Gashler A., Sukhatme V. P.. Early growth response protein 1 (Egr-1)prototype of a zinc-finger family of transcription factors. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. 1995;50:191-224.[Medline]

21. Germain E., Chajes V., Cognault S., Lhuillery C., Bougnoux P.. Enhancement of doxorubicin cytotoxicity by polyunsaturated fatty acids in the human breast tumor cell line MDA-MB-231relationship to lipid peroxidation. Int. J. Cancer 1998;75:578-583.[Medline]

22. Granneman J., Skoff R., Yang X. Y.. Member of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor family of transcription factors is differentially expressed by oligodendrocytes. J. Neurosci. Res. 1998;51:563-573.[Medline]

23. Grimaldi P. A., Teboul L., Inadera H., Gaillard D., Amri E. Z.. Trans-differentiation of myoblasts to adipoblaststriggering effects of fatty acids and thiazolidinediones. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 1997;57:71-75.[Medline]

24. Hanley K., Yan J., He S. S., Friedman M., Elias P. M., Bikle D. D., Williams M. L., Feingold K. R.. Keratinocyte differentiation is stimulated by activators of the nuclear hormone receptor PPAR{alpha}. J. Investig. Dermatol. 1998;110:368-375.[Medline]

25. Iigo M., Nakagawa T., Ishikawa C., Iwahori Y., Asamoto M., Yazawa K., Araki E., Tsuda H.. Inhibitory effects of docosahexaenoic acid on colon carcinoma 26 metastasis to the lung. Br. J. Cancer 1997;75:650-655.[Medline]

26. Issemann I., Green S.. Activation of a member of the steroid hormone receptor superfamily by peroxisome proliferators [see comments]. Nature (Lond.) 1990;347:645-650.[Medline]

27. Jiang W. G., Hiscox S., Hallett M. B., Horrobin D. F., Mansel R. E., Puntis M. C.. Regulation of the expression of E-cadherin on human cancer cells by gamma-linolenic acid (GLA). Cancer Res 1995;55:5043-5048.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

28. Khan W. A., Blobe G. C., Hannun Y. A.. Arachidonic acid and free fatty acids as second messengers and the role of protein kinase C. Cell. Signalling 1995;7:171-184.[Medline]

29. Kliewer S. A., Lenhard J. M., Willson T. M., Patel I., Morris D. C., Lehmann J. M.. A prostaglandin J2 metabolite binds peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and promotes adipocyte differentiation. Cell 1995;83:813-819.[Medline]

30. Kliewer S. A., Sundseth S. S., Jones S. A., Brown P. J., Wisely G. B., Koble C. S., Devchand P., Wahli W., Willson T. M., Lenhard J. M., Lehmann J. M.. Fatty acids and eicosanoids regulate gene expression through direct interactions with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors alpha and gamma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997;94:4318-4323.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Krey G., Braissant O., Kalkhoven L.H.F.E., Perroud M., Parker M. G., Wahli W.. Fatty acids, eicosanoids, and hypolipidemic agents identified as ligands of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors by coactivator-dependent receptor ligand assay. Mol. Endocrinol. 1997;11:779-791.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

32. Latruffe N., Vamecq J.. Peroxisome proliferators and peroxisome proliferator activated receptors (PPARs) as regulators of lipid metabolism. Biochimie 1997;79:81-94.[Medline]

33. Ledwith B. J., Johnson T. E., Wagner L. K., Pauley C. J., Manam S., Galloway S. M., Nichols W. W.. Growth regulation by peroxisome proliferatorsopposing activities in early and late G1. Cancer Res 1996;56:3257-3264.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Ledwith B. J., Manam S., Troilo P., Joslyn D. J., Galloway S. M., Nichols W. W.. Activation of immediate-early gene expression by peroxisome proliferators in vitro. Mol. Carcinog. 1993;8:20-27.[Medline]

35. Ledwith B. J., Pauley C. J., Wagner L. K., Rokos C. L., Alberts D. W., Manam S.. Induction of cyclooxygenase-2 expression by peroxisome proliferators and non-tetradecanoylphorbol 12,13-myristate-type tumor promoters in immortalized mouse liver cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:3707-3714.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Lee S., . S.,Pineau T., Drago J., Lee E. J., Owens J. W., Kroetz D. L., Fernandez-Salguero P. M., Westphal H., Gonzalez F. J.. Targeted disruption of the alpha isoform of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gene in mice results in abolishment of the pleiotropic effects of peroxisome proliferators. Mol. Cell. Biol. 1995;15:3012-3022.[Abstract]

37. Noguchi M., Minami M., Yagasaki R., Kinoshita K., Earashi M., Kitagawa H., Taniya T., Miyazaki I.. Chemoprevention of DMBA-induced mammary carcinogenesis in rats by low-dose EPA and DHA. Br. J. Cancer 1997;75:348-353.[Medline]

38. Peters J. M., Cattley R. C., Gonzalez F. J.. Role of PPAR alpha in the mechanism of action of the nongenotoxic carcinogen and peroxisome proliferator Wy-14,643. Carcinogenesis 1997;18:2029-2033.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

39. Peters J. M., Hennuyer N., Staels B., Fruchart J. C., Fievet C., Gonzalez F. J., Auwerx J.. Alterations in lipoprotein metabolism in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha-deficient mice. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:27307-27312.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Pineau T., Hudgins W. R., Liu L., Chen L. C., Sher T., Gonzalez F. J., Samid D.. Activation of a human peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor by the antitumor agent phenylacetate and its analogs. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1996;52:659-667.[Medline]

41. Ramesh G., Das U. N.. Effect of free fatty acids on two-stage skin carcinogenesis in mice. Cancer Lett 1996;100:199-209.[Medline]

42. Roberts R. A.. Non-genotoxic hepatocarcinogenesissuppression of apoptosis by peroxisome proliferators. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1996;804:588-611.[Medline]

43. Roberts R. A., James N. H., Woodyatt N. J., Macdonald N., Tugwood J. D.. Evidence for the suppression of apoptosis by the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha). Carcinogenesis 1998;19:43-48.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

44. Roberts R. A., Nebert D. W., Hickman J. A., Richburg J. H., Goldsworthy T. L.. Perturbation of the mitosis/apoptosis balancea fundamental mechanism in toxicology. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1997;38:107-115.[Medline]

45. Rokos C. L., Ledwith B. J.. Peroxisome proliferators activate extracellular signal-regulated kinases in immortalized mouse liver cells. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:13452-13457.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

46. Sakai M., Matsushima-Hibiya Y., Nishizawa M., Nishi S.. Suppression of rat glutathione transferase P expression by peroxisome proliferatorsinteraction between Jun and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha. Cancer Res 1995;55:5370-5376.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Salerno J. W., Smith D. E.. The use of sesame oil and other vegetable oils in the inhibition of human colon cancer growth in vitro. Anticancer Res 1991;11:209-215.[Medline]

48. Schoonjans K., Martin G., Staels B., Auwerx J.. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, orphans with ligands and functions. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 1997;8:159-166.[Medline]

49. Shalev A., Siegrist-Kaiser C. A., Yen P. M., Wahli W., Burger A. G., Chin W. W., Meier C. A.. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha is a phosphoproteinregulation by insulin. Endocrinology 1996;137:4499-4502.[Abstract]

50. Sokoloski J. A., Hodnick W. F., Mayne S. T., Cinquina C., Kim C. S., Sartorelli A. C.. Induction of the differentiation of HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells by vitamin E and other antioxidants in combination with low levels of vitamin D3possible relationship to NF-kappaB. Leukemia 1997;11:1546-1553.[Medline]

51. Spiegelman B. M., Hu E., Kim J. B., Brun R.. PPAR gamma and the control of adipogenesis. Biochimie 1997;79:111-112.[Medline]

52. Sumida C.. Fatty acidsancestral ligands and modern co-regulators of the steroid hormone receptor cell signalling pathway. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 1995;52:137-144.[Medline]

53. Takahashi M., Minamoto T., Yamashita N., Kato T., Yazawa K., Esumi H.. Effect of docosahexaenoic acid on azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats. Cancer Lett 1994;83:177-184.[Medline]

54. Tontonoz P., Hu E., Spiegelman B. M.. Stimulation of adipogenesis in fibroblasts by PPAR gamma 2, a lipid-activated transcription factor [published erratum appears in Cell 80: 957ff. (1995)]. Cell 1994;79:1147-1156.[Medline]

55. Tontonoz P., Nagy L., Alvarez J.G.A., Thomazy V. A., Evans R. M.. PPAR{gamma} promotes monocyte/macrophage differentiation and uptake of oxidized LDL. Cell 1998;93:241-252.[Medline]

56. Tsai M. H., Yu C. L., Wei F. S., Stacey D. W.. The effect of GTPase activating protein upon ras is inhibited by mitogenically responsive lipids. Science (Washington, DC) 1989;243:522-526.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Tsai W. S., Nagawa H., Muto T.. Differential effects of polyunsaturated fatty acids on chemosensitivity of NIH3T3 cells and its transformants. Int. J. Cancer 1997;70:357-361.[Medline]

58. Tugwood J. D., Issemann I., Anderson R. G., Bundell K. R., McPheat W. L., Green S.. The mouse peroxisome proliferator activated receptor recognizes a response element in the 5' flanking sequence of the rat acyl CoA oxidase gene. EMBO J 1992;11:433-439.[Medline]

59. Vanden Heuvel J. P., Holden P., Tugwood J., Ingle C., Yen W., Galjart N., Greenlee W. F.. Identification of a novel peroxisome proliferator responsive cDNA isolated from rat hepatocytes as the zinc-finger protein ZFP-37. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1998;152:107-118.[Medline]

60. Zhang B., Berger J., Zhou G., Elbrecht A., Biswas S., White-Carrington S., Szalkowski D., Moller D. E.. Insulin- and mitogen-activated protein kinase-mediated phosphorylation and activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma. J. Biol. Chem. 1996;271:31771-31774.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
J. P. Gray, J. W. Davis II, L. Gopinathan, T. L. Leas, C. A. Nugent, and J. P. Vanden Heuvel
The Ribosomal Protein rpL11 Associates with and Inhibits the Transcriptional Activity of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{alpha}
Toxicol. Sci., February 1, 2006; 89(2): 535 - 546.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
N. Strakova, J. Ehrmann, P. Dzubak, J. Bouchal, and Z. Kolar
The Synthetic Ligand of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-{gamma} Ciglitazone Affects Human Glioblastoma Cell Lines
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., June 1, 2004; 309(3): 1239 - 1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Han and N. Sidell
RU486-Induced Growth Inhibition of Human Endometrial Cells Involves the Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B Signaling Pathway
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., February 1, 2003; 88(2): 713 - 719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. G. Hunter, M. F. van Delft, R. A. Rachubinski, and J. P. Capone
Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor gamma Ligands Differentially Modulate Muscle Cell Differentiation and MyoD Gene Expression via Peroxisome Proliferator-activated Receptor gamma -dependent and -independent Pathways
J. Biol. Chem., October 5, 2001; 276(41): 38297 - 38306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vanden Heuvel, J. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vanden Heuvel, J. P.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1999 by American Society for Nutrition