![]() |
|
|
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011 and a Eppley Institute for Research in Cancer and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: glucocorticoid energy restriction skin mice diet
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has long been known that glucocorticoid hormones are potent
inhibitors of skin carcinogenesis. In particular, Belman and Troll (1972)
reported that topical application of steroidal anti-inflammatory
glucocorticoid analogues inhibited skin carcinogenesis in direct
proportion to their anti-inflammatory activity. Furthermore, dietary
administration of glucocorticoid hormone was also effective in skin
cancer prevention (Trainin 1963
). More recent studies demonstrated that
food restriction with reduction of all components of the diet (Pashko and Schwartz 1992
) and energy restriction, with reduction in fat and
carbohydrate (Yaktine et al. 1998
) elevated glucocorticoid hormone in
mice. The DER study demonstrated a 10-fold higher level of plasma
corticosterone in the restricted mice than in controls at 0700 h.
Research by Pashko and Schwartz (1992)
demonstrated the dependence of
food restriction prevention of skin carcinogenesis on an intact adrenal
gland. Food-restricted sham-operated mice had few papillomas after 12
wk of TPA in DMBA-initiated mice, whereas high rates of papilloma
developed in food-restricted adrenalectomized mice as well as in the
sham-operated and adrenalectomized fully fed controls. This experiment
did not demonstrate that glucocorticoid hormone was the critical
hormone. However, there is currently no evidence that other adrenal
hormones such as aldosterone or epinephrine contribute to skin
carcinogenesis; thus the most direct and rational hypothesis is that
elevated glucocorticoid hormone was responsible for the observation.
More recent studies indicated that adrenalectomy similarly blocked the
inhibition of lung carcinogenesis in diet-restricted animals (Pashko and Schwartz 1996
).
Glucocorticoid hormone (GCH) acts by binding to an intercellular
receptor, the glucocorticoid receptor, a member of the steroid hormone
receptor superfamily (Cato and Wade 1996
). Hormone binding alters
association with heat shock proteins and translocates the receptor to
the nucleus where the activated receptor acts as a transcription
factor. A body of research has demonstrated interactions between the
steroid hormone receptor superfamily members and members of the
activator protein-1 (AP-1) transcription factor family (Pfahl 1993
).
Such interactions are of particular interest because AP-1 induction by
TPA is required for tumor promotion, and the interaction between the
activated GR and AP-1 interfered with transcription from both GR- and
AP-1regulated genes (Pfahl 1993
). These observations provide the
foundation for our hypothesis that dietary energy restriction inhibits
mouse skin carcinogenesis by elevating GCH and GR, and the activated GR
interferes with AP-1 transcriptional regulation.
Our research on this hypothesis developed along two tracts, one assessing the activation of the GR in the DER mouse and the other assessing the effect of DER on the activation of the AP-1 transcription.
| Glucocorticoid activation in DER mouse epidermis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and GRß isoforms have
been observed in skin; the antibody used for this research detected
both of these forms without discrimination by subtype. Mice were killed
at 0700, 1600 and 2300 h, and the results of this experiment
indicated no consistent change in the GR protein with diet. Binding of
protein to the GR consensus sequence to assess activated receptor was
conducted on nuclear extracts of mice prefed control and DER diets.
These results clearly indicated that nuclear extracts of DER mice had
less binding activity than extracts from control mice. This was the
opposite of what would be expected if DER resulted in activation of the
GR. Finally, localization of GR protein in the epidermal cell was
assessed using immunogold and electron microscopy. This experiment
indicated no significant difference in the ratio of cytoplasmic:nuclear
receptor in epidermis from the control and DER mice (Yaktine et al. 1998Thus, none of these three lines of evidence suggested that DER resulted in activated GR. However, it is important to note that these are all indirect measurements of GR activation. Because the aim of these studies was to compare the effect of control and DER protocols, it was necessary to assess GR activation in mouse skin. To measure steroid hormone binding activity of the epidermis, it would be necessary to isolate mouse epidermal cells. However, such isolation would require heat or cold treatment of the epidermis and this would alter the heat shock proteins that are critical in the binding of the receptor with the hormone and activation of the receptor. This alteration would make dietary differences difficult or impossible to detect.
| AP-1 activation in the epidermis of DER mice |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The studies described above on GR activation in the DER mouse epidermis did not suggest that DER causes activation of GR that would interfere with AP-1. Thus, we assessed a constituent protein of AP-1, c-Jun, over the period of TPA induction in control and DER mice. This study was designed to determine if some of the inhibition in AP-1 induction was due to an inhibition in the induction of the constituent proteins for AP-1. Studies were conducted on c-jun at the message and protein levels by using Northern and Western blot strategies, respectively. Our results demonstrated an inhibition of c-jun message at 1 and 3 h after TPA in the epidermis from DER mice in comparison with control mice and a parallel inhibition in c-jun protein at 1, 6 and 24 h in these mice (unpublished data). These results suggest that the observed inhibition in AP-1 activation in the DER mouse epidermis was due to reduced induction in the constituent proteins of AP-1. Additional studies will be required to assess other constituent proteins of AP-1 and determine if our observations with c-jun are representative of other proteins that partner to form the AP-1 transcription factor.
| Cellular signaling that induces AP-1 transcription |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The MAPK pathway was of interest for our investigations because protein kinase C (PKC) plays a role in the activation of the MAPK pathway; our earlier investigations, as described below, demonstrated striking inhibition of specific PKC isoforms in the epidermis of DER mice. MAPK is activated by convergence of ras and PKC on Raf-1, a serine kinase. Raf-1 activates MAPK kinase (MEK) that induces extracellular response kinase (ERK). Activation of ERK results in induction of nuclear ELK that directly induces c-fos and indirectly induces c-jun. Studies are underway to determine whether TPA induction of ERK 1 and 2 is inhibited in the epidermis of DER mice.
| Influence of DER on PKC activity and expression |
|---|
|
|
|---|
,
,
and
;
dietary energy did not modify the presence of PKC
or
(Birt et al. 1994
and
in the epidermis
of DER mice in comparison with control mice in cytosolic and
particulate protein. For example, DER reduced the overall amount of PKC
in cytosol and particulate by 42 and 59%, respectively.
Recent observations from our laboratory provide evidence that
corticosterone has a role in the regulation of PKC protein expression.
We conducted preliminary studies on the effect of corticosterone in the
drinking water on PKC
,
,
and
expression in mouse
epidermis. Mice were bilaterally adrenalectomized and corticosterone
was provided in the drinking water. They were maintained with 0, 3, 30
or 60 µg corticosterone/mL drinking water for a period of 612 wk.
Circulating corticosterone and epidermal PKC
,
,
and
were
measured by radioimmunoassay and Western blot, respectively. A
dose-response relationship was observed in plasma corticosterone, with
the highest dose resulting in an average of ~270 ng corticosterone/mL
plasma. Adrenalectomized mice that were not given corticosterone in the
drinking water experienced no change in PKC
expression in
comparison with sham-operated mice. Corticosterone in the drinking
water resulted in decreased expression, and the difference was
significant with treatments of
3 µg/mL. PKC
was similarly
reduced by increasing doses of corticosterone, but PKC
and
were
not consistently influenced with increasing doses of corticosterone.
These results parallel our earlier observations on DER effects on PKC
protein (PKC
and
, reduced in DER mice; Birt et al. 1994
) and
support our hypothesis that expression of some isoforms of PKC (
and
) in mouse epidermis are responsive to circulating corticosterone
and reduced by the elevated hormone in the DER mouse, whereas other
isoforms (e.g., PKC
and
) are not responsive.
| SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
). Our studies on PKC expression in control and DER mice
that are either intact or adrenalectomized suggest that elevated GCH
may play some role in the inhibition of PKC isoforms in the DER mouse.
Our present working hypothesis is that elevated GCH in the DER mouse
reduces the amount and activity of PKC isoforms important in the
activation of the Raf-1/MAPK pathway. We further hypothesize that this
reduction in kinase activity attenuates the induction of c-jun and
AP-1. Because activation of AP-1 transcription by TPA was obligatory
for tumor promotion, we suggest that inhibition of this pathway by DER
contributes to the inhibition of skin carcinogenesis. We suggest that
DER prevention of skin cancer through hormonal mediators of
transcription may be extrapolated to other models in which DER inhibits
carcinogenesis, but the hormonal players and relevant signaling
pathways may differ, depending on those pathways that are active in the
tissues of interest.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Presented at the symposium "Steroid Hormone
Receptor and Nutrient Interactions: Implications for Cancer
Prevention" as part of Experimental Biology 98, April 1822, 1998,
San Francisco, CA. The symposium was sponsored by the American Society
for Nutritional Sciences and was supported in part by educational
grants from Loders Croklaan, Inc. and Slimfast Nutrition Institute.
Published as a supplement to The Journal of Nutrition. Guest
editors for the symposium publication were Diane F. Birt, Iowa State
University and Martha Belury, Purdue University. ![]()
2 Supported by the American Institute for Cancer
Research (AICR) award 97B039-REN and the National Cancer Institute
(NCI) grants 1R01 CA 42986 and CA77451. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used: AP-1, activator protein-1;
DER, dietary energy restriction; DMBA, 7-12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene;
ERK, extracellular response kinase; GCH, glucocorticoid hormone; GR,
glucocorticoid receptor; JNK, c-Jun-N-terminal kinase; MAPK,
mitogen-activated protein kinase; MEK, MAPK kinase; PKC, protein kinase
C; TPA, 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.
Belman S., Troll W.. The inhibition of croton oil-promoted mouse skin tumorigenesis by steroid hormones. Cancer Res 1972;32:450-454.
2. Birt D. F., Barnett T., Pour P. M., Copenhaver J.. High-fat diet blocks the inhibition of skin carcinogenesis and reductions in protein kinase C by moderate energy restriction. Mol. Carcinog. 1996;16:115-120.[Medline]
3.
Birt D. F., Copenhaver J., Pelling J. C., Anderson J.. Dietary energy restriction and fat modulation of protein kinase C isoenzymes and phorbol ester binding in Sencar mouse epidermis. Carcinogenesis 1994;15:2727-2732.
4.
Birt D. F., Pelling J. C., White L. T., Dimitroff K., Barnett T.. Influence of diet and calorie restriction on the initiation and promotion of skin carcinogenesis in the SENCAR mouse model. Cancer Res 1991;51:1851-1854.
5.
Birt D. F., Pinch H. J., Barnett T., Phan A., Dimitroff K.. Inhibition of skin tumor promotion by restriction of fat and carbohydrate calories in SENCAR mice. Cancer Res 1993;53:27-31.
6. Birt D. F., Shull J. D., Yaktine A.. Chemoprevention of Cancer. Shils M. E. Olson J. E. Shike M. Ross A. C. eds. Modern Nutrition in Health and Disease 1998:1263-1295 Williams & Wilkins Baltimore, MD.. .
7. Cato A.C.B., Wade E.. Molecular mechanisms of anti-inflammatory action of glucocorticoids. BioEssays 1996;18:371-378.[Medline]
8. Choe M., Kris E. S., Luthra R., Copenhaver J., Pelling J. C., Donnelly T. E., Birt D. F.. Protein kinase C is activated and diacylglycerol is elevated in epidermal cells from Sencar mice fed high fat diets. J. Nutr. 1992;122:2322-2329.
9.
Donnelly T. E., Birt D. F., Sittler R., Anderson C. L., Choe M., Julius A. D.. Dietary fat regulation of the association of protein kinase C activity with epidermal cell membranes. Carcinogenesis 1987;8:1867-1870.
10. Kris E. S., Choe M., Luthra R., Conway H., Barnett T., Yaktine A., Birt D. F.. Protein kinase C activity is reduced in epidermal cells from energy-restricted SENCAR mice. J. Nutr. 1994;124:485-492.
11.
Pashko L. L., Schwartz A. G.. Reversal of food restriction-induced inhibition of mouse skin tumor promotion by adrenalectomy. Carcinogenesis 1992;13:1925-1928.
12.
Pashko L. L., Schwartz A. G.. Inhibition of 7,12-dimethylbenzanthracene-induced lung tumorigenesis in A/J mice by food restriction is reversed by adrenalectomy. Carcinogenesis 1996;17:209-212.
13. Pfahl M.. Nuclear receptor/AP-1 interaction. Endocr. Rev. 1993;14:651-658.[Medline]
14. Trainin N.. Adrenal imbalance in mouse skin carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 1963;23:415-419.
15. Yaktine A., Vaughn R., Blackwood D., Duysen E., Birt D. F.. Dietary energy restriction in the SENCAR mouseelevation of glucocorticoid hormone levels but no change in distribution of glucocorticoid receptor in epidermal cells. Mol. Carcinog. 1998;21:62-69.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. Fan, K. Kouda, H. Nakamura, and H. Takeuchi Effects of Dietary Restriction on Spontaneous Dermatitis in NC/Nga Mice Experimental Biology and Medicine, December 1, 2001; 226(11): 1045 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||