![]() |
|
|
a Division of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology and b Food Science Group, Department of Food Technology and Nutritional Sciences, Wageningen Agricultural University, 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands and c Unilever Research Vlaardingen, 3130 AC Vlaardingen, The Netherlands
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-carotene and retinol and decreased the serum concentration
of lycopene. Serum total ß-carotene responses (changes in serum
concentrations from the start to the end of the intervention period)
differed significantly between the whole leaf and liquefied spinach
groups and between the minced and liquefied spinach groups. The lutein
response did not differ among spinach groups. Addition of dietary fiber
to the liquefied spinach had no effect on serum carotenoid responses.
The relative bioavailability as compared to bioavailability of the
carotenoid supplement for whole leaf, minced, liquefied and liquefied
spinach plus added dietary fiber for ß-carotene was 5.1, 6.4, 9.5 and
9.3%, respectively, and for lutein 45, 52, 55 and 54%, respectively.
We conclude that the bioavailability of lutein from spinach was higher
than that of ß-carotene and that enzymatic disruption of the matrix
(cell wall structure) enhanced the bioavailability of ß-carotene from
whole leaf and minced spinach, but had no effect on lutein
bioavailability.
KEY WORDS: carotenoids bioavailability processing spinach dietary fiber humans
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bioavailability is defined as the fraction of an ingested nutrient that
is available to the body for utilization in normal physiological
functions or for storage (Jackson 1997
). We have developed the mnemonic
SLAMENGHI, which includes all factors that could affect
bioavailability, especially bioavailability of ß-carotene and other
carotenoids (Castenmiller and West 1998
, de Pee and West 1996
). The
SLAMENGHI factors are as follows: Species of carotenoids,
molecular Linkage, Amount of carotenoids consumed
in a meal, Matrix in which the carotenoid is incorporated,
Effectors of absorption and bioconversion,
Nutrient status of the host, Genetic factors,
Host-related factors, and Interactions. Current
information on carotenoid bioavailability is limited, fragmentary, and
often conflicting. Apart from the many factors that determine
bioavailability, the lack of adequate indicators has made it difficult
to establish the bioavailability of carotenoids in food.
Carotenes dissolved in oil are more readily absorbed than when
they are incorporated in foods such as fruits and vegetables. The
plasma response to ingestion of ß-carotene dissolved in oil was found
to be about five times the response to a similar amount of ß-carotene
in carrots (Brown et al. 1989
, Micozzi et al. 1992
). Recent studies in
Indonesia have shown that feeding ß-carotene from dark-green, leafy
vegetables produced a lower plasma response than similar quantities of
ß-carotene in a fat matrix (de Pee et al. 1995
). The serum response
to ß-carotene from fruits was four times higher than that from
vegetables (de Pee et al. 1998
). Cooking or fine grinding of foods
could increase the bioavailability of carotenes by disrupting or
softening plant cell walls and disrupting carotenoid-protein complexes
(Hussein and El-Tohamy 1990
, VAN Zeben and Hendriks 1948
).
The greater ease with which carotenoids in thermally treated foods can
be extracted during analysis may imply that they are also biologically
more available.
We describe a controlled dietary intervention study with differently
processed spinach products to examine the effect of the food matrix on
carotenoid concentrations in human serum. Different processing
techniques were used as a means of testing the role of cellular
structure. One of the spinach products was treated with a mixture of
enzymes, which causes disruption of the cell wall structure as well as
depolymerization of the cell wall components, reducing the dietary
fiber content of the spinach product. Dietary pectin added to meals
reduced plasma responses to ß-carotene in humans (Rock and Swendseid 1992
). Thus, by adding sugar beet fiber, we also examined the effect of
restoring fiber to the enzyme-treated spinach on serum carotenoid
concentrations. Although the fiber added replaced that lost during
enzyme treatment, it did not restore cell wall structure or cellular
integrity.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The subjects were 72 healthy, non-smoking, normolipidemic volunteers: 42 women and 30 men, aged 1858 y. The subjects, students of Wageningen Agricultural University and other residents of the Wageningen area, were recruited through local advertisements and all gave their written informed consent. None of the subjects were taking oral medication, apart from oral contraceptives, nor supplements of any kind during the last 3 mo before the study started and during the study period. Subjects were screened for elevated fasting glucose and protein levels in urine and for low hemoglobin and abnormal hematology. All subjects completed a medical and a general questionnaire and food frequency questionnaires to estimate their habitual intakes of energy, carotenoids and vitamin A. All subjects had normal body mass indices (1828 kg/m2), fasting serum cholesterol concentrations < 6.5 mmol/L and fasting triacylglycerol concentrations < 2.8 mmol/L. During the study, two male volunteers withdrew from the study for personal reasons. Characteristics of the subjects are presented in Table 1 . The protocol for this study was approved by the Medical-Ethical Committee of the Division of Human Nutrition and Epidemiology of Wageningen Agricultural University.
|
The study started with a 3-wk run-in period followed by a dietary intervention period of 3 wk. During the intervention period, subjects were allocated to one of six experimental groups. Blood was taken by venipuncture from fasting subjects between 7.15 and 10.00 h at the start of the run-in period and at days 0, 1, 8, 15, 21 and 22 of the dietary intervention period. Blood samples, to which no anticoagulant was added, were left to clot and were centrifuged within 1 h after being drawn. The serum was separated and stored at -80°C until analysis.
During the first 3 wk of the study (run-in period), subjects chose
their own diets but were instructed to avoid foods rich in carotenoids
and vitamin A. During the dietary intervention period, subjects were
supplied with total diets, except for a limited choice of free products
(approximately 10 energy%), which did not contain carotenoids or
retinol. Subjects received a hot meal at the Division of Human
Nutrition and Epidemiology and foods for their other meals and snacks
were packed to be taken home. A maximum of two alcoholic consumptions
per day was allowed but were not permitted to be consumed together with
the hot meal. Duplicate portions of diets were collected for chemical
analysis. The daily selection of free choice foods was recorded in a
diary, and the nutrient content was calculated (Stichting NEVO 1995
).
Individual body weights throughout the study were maintained ± 2
kg.
Diet.
All subjects in the six treatment groups were fed the same control diet
throughout the study, and the menu was changed daily on a weekly cycle.
The control diet consisted of foods, other than fruits and vegetables
with moderate or high amounts of carotenoids, and met the requirements
of Dutch Recommended Daily Allowances (Netherlands Food and Nutrition
Council 1992
). Four groups received a spinach product, one control
group received no additional source of carotenoids and one group
received a carotenoid supplement. The carotenoid supplement was a
suspension in vegetable oil of microcrystalline ß-carotene (40 g/kg;
Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and crystalline lutein and
zeaxanthin derived from marigold flowers (60 g/kg and 3 g/kg,
respectively; FloraGLO, Kemin Industries, Des Moines, IA), added to
salad dressing. The energy content of the diets of the control group
and carotenoid supplement group was adjusted to that of the spinach
groups by providing extra amounts of appropriate foods. The spinach
groups received 20 g whole leaf spinach, minced spinach, liquefied
spinach or liquefied spinach to which dietary fiber was added/MJ. All
spinach products originated from one batch and were prepared and
provided by Langnese-Iglo in Wunstorf (Germany) for Unilever Research
Vlaardingen (The Netherlands). Four different spinach products were
prepared: whole leaf spinach with an almost intact food matrix; minced
spinach in which the matrix is partially disrupted; enzymatically
liquefied spinach in which the matrix is disrupted; and the
enzymatically liquefied spinach to which dietary fiber was added. The
whole leaf spinach was washed and subsequently blanched for 90 s
and cooled down quickly. The minced spinach was minced to 5 mm after
blanching. The liquefied spinach was prepared by treating minced
spinach with an enzymatic preparation with pectinase, hemicellulase and
cellulase activities (Rapidase LIQ plus, Gist-brocades, Seclin, France)
during 2.5 h at 35°C. After the enzyme treatment,
the spinach was boiled for 510 min to inactivate the enzymes. The
spinach products were frozen immediately after processing. Liquefaction
resulted in a breakdown of cell wall material. Therefore, the fourth
group received the liquefied spinach plus fiber prepared from sugar
beet (10 g/kg wet weight, Fibrex 600, TEFCO Food Ingredients b.v.,
Bodegraven, The Netherlands) to compensate for the loss of dietary
fiber. This fiber product contains per 100 g of product, 73 g
of dietary fiber of which one third is soluble and 22 g is pectin.
All frozen spinach was thawed and heated by microwave before
consumption. The spinach products contained no measurable nitrite, and
the content of nitrate was less than 1000 mg/kg, thus ensuring that the
nitrate intake of the subjects was below the Acceptable Daily Intake
for nitrate (FAO/WHO 1995
). Microbiological counts showed normal values
and confirmed that the spinach products were safe for human
consumption.
Serum measurements.
Serum carotenoids and retinol were measured by high performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) (Craft and Wise 1992
). To avoid day-to-day
analytic variations, all samples from an individual were analyzed
sequentially as a set. After precipitation with ethanol, extraction
followed with hexane twice; samples were evaporated under nitrogen and
injected into the HPLC system described below. Serum cholesterol and
triacylglycerol concentrations were analyzed with the Abbott Spectrum
high performance diagnostic system following a standard procedure
(Siedel et al. 1983
, Sullivan et al. 1985
).
Food measurements.
The duplicate portions of the daily food intake of one subject
collected throughout the study were mixed thoroughly as weekly
portions, and subsequently pooled samples were stored at
-20°C until analysis. The moisture level and the ash
content in each weekly portion were determined (Osborne and Voogt 1978
)
using a vacuum oven at 85°C and a muffle furnace at
550°C. The protein concentration was determined by the
Kjeldahl method using a conversion factor of 6.25. The Folch method
(Folch et al. 1957
) was used to extract fat. Digestible carbohydrate
was calculated by difference. Dietary fiber was analysed according to
the AOAC Official Method 992.16 for total dietary fiber (AOAC 1996
).
The dietary fiber content of the various spinach products was
determined as methanol-ether insoluble solids
(MEIS)4and the amount of pectin (polygalacturonic acid) in the spinach
products was measured by hydrolyzing pectic substances to water-soluble
galacturonic acid using an enzyme preparation (Katan and van de Bovenkamp 1981
). Carotenoids and retinol were determined in the pooled
samples and in spinach products and salad dressings containing the
carotenoid supplement. Carotenoids and retinol were extracted from wet
material after homogenisation, using tetrahydrofuran (THF) and
redissolved in THF/methanol (1:1 v/v) and injected into the HPLC system
described below.
Chemicals and instrumentation for carotenoid and retinol analysis.
Pure grades of all-trans-
carotene,
all-trans-ßcarotene and lycopene were obtained from
Sigma Chemical Co. (St Louis, MO) and all-trans-lutein,
all-trans-zeaxanthin, and
all-trans-ß-cryptoxanthin from Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd
(Basel, Switzerland). The carotenoid concentrations of the standards
were measured in a Zeiss M4 QIII spectrophotometer (Carl Zeiss,
Oberkochen/Württemberg, Germany). The HPLC system, manufactured
by Thermo Separation Products (San Jose, CA), was equipped with a pump
(P4000), a solvent degasser (SCM1000), a temperature controlled
autosampler (AS3000), a UV-visible forward optical scanning detector
(Spectra Focus UV3000), interface (SN4000), and control and integration
software (PC1000, version 3.0). A reversed phase Vydac 218 TP 54 column
containing silica polymerically modified with C18 from The Separations
Group (Hesperia, CA) was used, and the metal frits in the column were
replaced by a PAT (Peek Alloyed with Teflon) frits from the same
manufacturer to minimize carotenoid degradation on the column. The
mobile phase consisted of a mixture of methanol and THF (98:2 v/v). For
each series of analyses of serum samples, a control serum sample was
analysed. The coefficients of variation (CV) within runs for serum
analysis of
-carotene, ß-carotene, lutein, zeaxanthin,
ß-cryptoxanthin, lycopene and retinol in control pools averaged 7.4,
3.9, 3.6, 8.7, 4.5, 10.4 and 1.6%, respectively. For each series of
analyses of food samples, a control sample (homogenized baby food) was
extracted in duplicate and injected into the HPLC system for monitoring
the stability of the analytical procedure over time. The CV within runs
for food analysis of
-carotene, ß-carotene and lutein in control
pools averaged 5.7, 6.8 and 8.8%, respectively. All sample
preparations and extractions were carried out in duplicate and under
subdued yellow light with minimal exposure to oxygen (Hulshof et al. 1997
).
Statistical analysis.
Serum concentrations were averaged for d 0 and 1 and for d 21 and 22
for each subject. For each person, the response to treatment was
calculated as the change in serum concentrations from the start to the
end of the intervention period. Two-tailed t-tests for
independent samples were performed to evaluate differences in serum
responses between the control and treatment groups and between the
carotenoid supplement and pooled spinach groups. To compare differences
in responses among the groups receiving various spinach products, after
significant F-tests (ANOVA) the Tukey method for multiple
comparisons was used (Godfrey 1985
). Analyses were carried out using
general linear models to compare differences in response among
intervention groups, controlling for several factors and covariables,
including sex, vegetarian diet, age, body mass index and change in
cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations. Spearman correlation
coefficients for the entire study group were calculated when relevant.
Differences associated with P < 0.05 were regarded as
significant (SPSS/PC 7.5, 1997, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL).
The relative bioavailability of ß-carotene and lutein was calculated by dividing the serum response (µmol/L) relative to the intake of the respective carotenoid in each spinach group (mg/MJ) by the serum response to the carotenoid in the supplement group relative to the intake of carotenoid in the carotenoid supplement (mg/MJ). The serum carotenoid responses were adjusted for serum responses in the control group, and the amount of carotenoid consumed (mg/MJ) by the control group was subtracted from the amount consumed by each spinach group.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The composition of the diets is given in Table 2
. Consumption of spinach significantly increased the serum
concentrations of all-trans-ßcarotene,
cis-ßcarotene (and consequently total ß-carotene),
lutein (Table 3
, Fig. 1and Fig. 2),
-carotene and retinol (P < 0.05); decreased the
serum concentration of lycopene as compared to the control group
(P < 0.05); and had no effect on serum concentrations
of zeaxanthin and ß-cryptoxanthin. The serum responses (changes in
serum concentrations from the start to the end of the intervention
period) of total ß-carotene and lutein were significantly related
(rs = 0.51; P < 0.001).
The
-carotene response was significantly correlated to the total
ß-carotene response (rs = 0.69;
P < 0.001), and the all-trans-ß-carotene
and cis-ß-carotene responses were significantly correlated
(rs = 0.79; P < 0.001).
|
|
|
|
The carotenoid supplement group had significantly higher responses of
serum concentrations of all-trans-ßcarotene,
cis-ßcarotene, (and consequently total ß-carotene),
lutein (Table 3)
, zeaxanthin and
-carotene than the control group,
and significantly higher responses of
all-trans-ßcarotene, cis-ßcarotene, (and
consequently total ß-carotene) (Table 3)
, zeaxanthin,
-carotene,
lycopene and ß-cryptoxanthin than the pooled spinach groups. Thus,
the food matrix (cellular structure) played an important role in the
uptake of ß-carotene from spinach. Processing spinach in various ways
did not affect lutein bioavailability.
Dietary fiber.
The all-trans-ß-carotene, cis-ß-carotene, total ß-carotene and lutein serum responses in the liquefied spinach group were not different from the responses in the liquefied spinach plus added dietary fiber group. Adding 10 g of sugar beet fiber per kg wet weight of spinach had no effect on serum carotenoid response. The enzyme-treated spinach contained 13% less MEIS (methanol-ether insoluble solids) and 17% less polygalacturonic acid than the whole leaf spinach, which contained per 100 g dry matter 71 g MEIS and 11 g polygalacturonic acid, respectively. The composition of the sugar beet fiber added to spinach was comparable to the fiber present in the whole leaf spinach, but had a higher amount of pectin.
Retinol.
The decrease in serum concentration of retinol was significantly less (P = 0.04) in the pooled spinach groups than in the control group. Serum retinol concentrations decreased in the control group (7.6%), in the minced spinach group (5.1%) and liquefied spinach plus dietary fiber group (2.9%), but increased in the carotenoid supplement group (2.9%), whole leaf spinach group (1.4%) and liquefied spinach group (0.4%).
Cholesterol and triacylglycerol.
The changes in serum cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations
after 3 wk of dietary intervention (serum cholesterol and
triacylglycerol responses) of the carotenoid supplement group and
pooled spinach groups were not significantly different from the
response in the control group. Normalized serum concentrations of total
ß-carotene and lutein were calculated as follows: carotenoid
concentration/(cholesterol + triacylglycerol concentration).
Adjustment of serum carotenoid concentrations for concentrations of
cholesterol and other lipids may provide a better reflection of dietary
intake of carotenoids (Willett et al. 1983
). Analysis of the normalized
serum carotenoid concentrations of total ß-carotene and lutein showed
significant differences of the normalized ß-carotene responses
between the whole leaf spinach and liquefied spinach group
(P = 0.05) and between the whole leaf spinach group and
liquefied spinach plus added dietary fiber group (P <
0.02).
Diets.
The chemical analysis of the diets supplied showed consistent data for the 3 wk and among the treatment groups. Surprisingly, the enzyme-treated spinach products, which were treated for 2.5 h at 35°C, did not have a higher concentration of cis-ßcarotene than the whole leaf spinach. Chemical analysis of the salad dressings showed that the carotenoid supplement should provide daily per 11 MJ energy intake: ß-carotene, 10.9 mg (all-trans-ßcarotene, 10.5 mg;cis-ßcarotene, 0.4 mg); lutein, 12.2 mg; and zeaxanthin, 1.0 mg. However, from the analysis of the duplicate portions of ~11 MJ of the carotenoid supplement group, the daily intake of lutein was 46% lower (6.6 ± 0.2 mg) than was to be expected from the lutein concentrations in the salad dressings, whereas the daily intake of ß-carotene in the duplicate food portions was 10% lower than expected based on the amounts analysed in the salad dressing (Table 2) . Prepared spinach products, as consumed during the dietary intervention period, contained 1518% of the ß-carotene as cisisomers. The amounts of total ß-carotene and lutein in the duplicate food portions were 09% and 3143%, respectively, lower than those expected to be present in the daily food from analysis of the spinach products. The amount of carotenoids measured in the duplicate portions was used to calculate relative bioavailability.
Estimate of relative bioavailability.
Based on the analysis of the duplicate portions, the bioavailability of
ß-carotene from spinach as compared to the carotenoid supplement was
5.1, 6.4, 9.5 and 9.3% for whole leaf, minced, liquefied and liquefied
spinach plus added dietary fiber, respectively. The bioavailability of
ß-carotene from whole leaf spinach was calculated as follows:
![]() |
The relative bioavailability of lutein from spinach was 45, 52, 55 and 54% for whole leaf, minced, liquefied and liquefied spinach plus added dietary fiber, respectively. Thus, enzymatic treatment increased the relative bioavailability of ß-carotene in spinach by about half. The relative bioavailability of lutein in spinach was more than five times higher than that of ß-carotene and was not affected by the enzymatic treatment.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-carotene and retinol and decreased serum concentrations of
lycopene. For ß-carotene, but not for lutein, there was a significant
effect of processing: liquefied spinach, in which the vegetable food
matrix is disrupted, produced a higher serum response than whole leaf
spinach, where the food matrix is still intact, and minced spinach.
Addition of dietary fiber to liquefied spinach does not restore the
cellular structure, but did compensate for the fiber that was broken
down and had no effect on serum responses of carotenoids as compared to
serum responses after consumption of liquefied spinach.
There are three possible explanations for the low bioavailability of
ß-carotene (5.19.5%) from spinach compared to the carotenoid
supplement. First is the food matrix in which the carotenoids are
embedded. Other investigators also found a low bioavailability of
ß-carotene from vegetables as compared to pure ß-carotene:
stir-fried vegetables, 7% (de Pee et al. 1995
); carrots, 1826%
(Brown et al. 1989
, Micozzi et al. 1992
, Törrönen et al. 1996
). Rock et al. (1998)
found a trend for a greater percentage
increase in plasma concentrations of total ß-carotene in the period
when thermally processed and pureed carrots and spinach were fed to
healthy women as compared to the period when these women were fed raw
carrots and spinach.
Second is the isomeric form of ß-carotene in spinach. The carotenoid
supplement dissolved in oil contained mainly
all-trans-ßcarotene (approximately 96%), whereas in the
spinach products 1518% of the ß-carotene was present as cisisomers. Several investigators have shown that
all-trans-ßcarotene is more readily absorbed than its
cis isomers (Ben-Amotz and Levy 1996
, Gaziano et al. 1995
,
Jensen et al. 1987
, Tamia et al. 1995
). Rock et al. (1998)
recently
found that feeding subjects thermally processed and pureed spinach that
provided an increased proportion of cis-ßcarotene was
not associated with a significant increase in the plasma
cis-ßcarotene concentration after 4 wk. They concluded
that isomerization of ß-carotene in foods by heat treatment does not
negate the enhanced ß-carotene uptake associated with consuming
processed vegetables compared with raw vegetables. In our study, a
significant increase in the serum concentrations of the
cis-ß-carotene was observed in the treatment groups at the
end of the dietary intervention period. The relative bioavailability of
all-trans-ßcarotene for whole leaf, minced, liquefied
and liquefied spinach plus added dietary fiber was 6.2, 6.8, 10.1 and
9.9% and of cis-ßcarotene was 4.1, 4.2, 6.6 and 6.2%,
respectively. These results provide some support for more ready
absorption of all-trans-ßcarotene than
cis-ßcarotene. However, the issue needs further
research. The ratio of serum all-trans- tocis-ßcarotene was strongly correlated in our study. It is not
known whether this is due to an artefact produced by the chemical
analysis because measuring cis-ßcarotene isomers in
chlorophyl-containing foods is extremely difficult or whether
ß-carotene isomers are in some sort of equilibrium in human serum.
Third, there may be an effect of other carotenoids on the
bioavailability of ß-carotene. Kostic et al. (1995)
found that when
ß-carotene and lutein were given to subjects in the same dose,
ß-carotene significantly reduced the serum area-under-the-curve
values for lutein. Also Micozzi et al. (1992)
found that oral doses of
ß-carotene (12 or 30 mg daily for 6 wk) lowered serum lutein
concentrations in men. In contrast, a preferential increase in
chylomicron concentrations of lutein compared to ß-carotene in the
presence of high amounts of ß-carotene and small amounts of lutein
was described by Gärtner et al. (1996)
. Although our study was
not designed to examine the interaction between carotenoids, we found
no evidence to conclude that ß-carotene and lutein interact with each
other.
The relative bioavailability of lutein from spinach products ranged from 45 to 55%. Thus, we conclude that the relative bioavailability of lutein from spinach is greater than that of ß-carotene and less affected by the food matrix. Lutein, which is a dihydroxycarotenoid, is about 0.1% as lipophylic as ß-carotene. This may explain why the matrix in which lutein is embedded in spinach does not reduce lutein absorption as it does the absorption of ß-carotene. The amount of lutein found in the duplicate portions was much lower than was to be expected from addition of the results of the separate analyses of the control diet and either the carotenoid supplement or the spinach products. Lutein from spinach products and from the carotenoid supplement was apparently lost when added to a complete, daily diet. The composition of the carotenoid supplement was based on analysis of the various spinach products and experiments to examine the preferred preparation of the spinach for this study. Unexpectedly, at the time of the intervention study, the lutein content of the spinach products was found to be higher than those analyzed several months before the study, which partly explains why the carotenoid supplement group received less lutein than the spinach groups.
One of the effects of dietary fiber on lipid metabolism centres upon
its interactions with bile acids, resulting in their increased loss by
faecal excretion, disturbance of micelle formation and thus a decreased
absorption of fats and fat soluble substances (Olson 1994
). Addition of
dietary fiber to liquefied spinach had no effect on the serum
ß-carotene responses. Rock and Swendseid (1992)
reported earlier that
adding 12 g dietary citrus pectin to controlled meals with 25 mg
synthetic ß-carotene (0.48 g pectin/mg ß-carotene) reduced the
increase in plasma ß-carotene. In our study, where the proportion of
dietary fiber added (0.23 g fiber/mg ß-carotene) was half that used
earlier (Rock and Swendseid 1992
), we were not able to demonstrate an
effect of dietary fiber.
In all groups, intake of carotenoids other than ß-carotene and lutein
was rather low. We found that the
-carotene response was
significantly correlated to the ß-carotene response, which is in line
with the finding of others that ß-carotene supplementation increases
concentrations of
-carotene (Castenmiller and West 1998
).
In conclusion, this study confirmed that the bioavailability of ß-carotene, and to a lesser extent of lutein, was affected by the food matrix and that processing spinach had an effect on the matrix (disruption of cell wall structure and loss of cellular integrity), and thus on the bioavailability of ß-carotene from spinach. The bioavailability of ß-carotene from liquefied spinach was higher than from whole leaf or minced spinach. We could not demonstrate an effect on serum ß-carotene or lutein responses from the addition of dietary fiber to liquefied spinach. This suggests that once the cell wall components are broken down, addition of dietary fiber in amounts previously present in the food, has no effect on bioavailability of carotenoids. A limitation of the present study may be that subjects in the control group were fed low-carotenoid diets. The effects of feeding carotenoids in this type of study may result in greater apparent increases and differences in serum carotenoid responses. To obtain estimates of absolute bioavailability and to understand the mechanisms involved, it will be necessary to carry out studies using other experimental approaches including those involving isotopically-labelled carotenoids.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by Unilever Research
Vlaardingen, The Netherlands and by the Commission of the European
Communities, Agriculture and Fisheries (FAIR) specific RTD programme
CT950158, Improving the quality and nutritional value of
processed foods by optimal use of food antioxidants (Project
Leader: B. Sandström, Copenhagen, Denmark). This paper does not
necessarily reflect the Commission's views and in no way anticipates
its future policy in this area. ![]()
2 The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked ''advertisement'' in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. ![]()
3 Abbreviations used: CV, coefficients of
variation; MEIS, methanol-ether insoluble solids; PAT, Peek Alloyed
with Teflon; THF, tetrahydrofuran. ![]()
Manuscript received August 25, 1998. Initial review completed September 16, 1998. Revision accepted November 4, 1998.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. AOAC Official Method 992.16 for total dietary fiber (1996) In: Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (Cunniff, P., ed.), vol. II, 16th ed., 1995. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Gaithersburg, MD..
2.
Ben-Amotz A., Levy Y.. Bioavailability of a natural isomer mixture compared with synthetic all-trans ß-carotene in human serum. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996;63:729-734.
3.
Brown E. D., Micozzi M. S., Craft N. E., Bieri J. G., Beecher G., Edwards B. K., Rose A., Taylor P. R., Smith J. C., Jr. Plasma carotenoids in normal men after a single ingestion of vegetables or purified ß-carotene. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1989;49:1258-1265.
4. Castenmiller J.J.M., West C. E.. Bioavailability and bioconversion of carotenoids. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1998;18:19-38.[Medline]
5. Craft N. E., Wise S. A.. Optimization of an isocratic high-performance liquid chromotographic separation of carotenoids. J. Chromatogr. 1992;589:171-176.
6. de Pee S., West C. E.. Dietary carotenoids and their role in combating vitamin A deficiencya review of the literature. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996;50:S38-S53.
7. de Pee S., West C. E., Muhilal , Karyadi D., Hautvast J.G.A.J.. Lack of improvement in vitamin A status with increased consumption of dark-green leafy vegetables. Lancet 1995;346:75-81.[Medline]
8. de Pee S., West C. E., Permaesih D., Martuti S., Muhilal & Hautvast J.G.A.J.. Orange fruit is more effective than are dark-green leafy vegetables in increasing serum concentrations of retinol and ß-carotene in schoolchildren in Indonesia. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998;68:1058-1067.[Abstract]
9. FAO/WHO (1995) Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants. Forty-fourth report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. WHO Technical Report Series 859. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland..
10.
Folch J., Lees M., Sloane Stanley G. H.. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 1957;226:497-509.
11. Gärtner C., Stahl W., Sies H.. Preferential increase in chylomicron levels of the xanthophylls lutein and zeaxanthin compared to ß-carotene in the human Int. J. Vit. Nutr. Res. 1996;66:119-125.
12.
Gaziano J. M., Johnson E. J., Russell R. M., Manson J. E., Stampfer M. J., Ridker P. M., Frei B., Hennekens C. H., Krinsky N. I.. Discrimination in absorption or transport of ß-carotene isomers after oral supplementation with either all-trans- or 9-cis-ß-carotene. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995;61:1248-1252.
13. Godfrey K.. Statistics in practiceComparing the means of several groups. N. Engl. J. Med. 1985;313:1450-1456.[Abstract]
14. Hulshof P.J.M., Chao X., van de Bovenkamp P., Muhilal & West C. E.. Application of a validated method for the determination of provitamin A carotenoids in Indonesian foods of different maturity and origin. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1997;45:1174-1179.
15. Hussein L., El-Tohamy M.. Vitamin A potency of carrot and spinach carotenes in human metabolic studies. Int. J. Vit. Nutr. Res. 1990;60:229-235.
16. Jackson M. J.. The assessment of bioavailability of micronutrientsintroduction. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997;51:S1-S2.
17. Jensen C. D., Howes T. W., Spiller G. A., Pattison T. S., Whittam J. H., Scala J.. Observations on the effects of ingesting cis and trans-beta-carotene isomers on human serum concentrations. Nutr. Rep. Int. 1987;35:413-422.
18. Katan M. B., van de Bovenkamp P.. Determination of total dietary fiber by difference and of pectin by colorimetry or copper titration. James W.P.T. Theander O. eds. The Analysis of Dietary Fiber in Food 1981:217-239 Marcel Dekker, Inc New York, NY.. .
19.
Kostic D., White W. S., Olson J. A.. Intestinal absorption, serum clearance, and interactions between lutein and ß-carotene when administered to human adults in separate or combined oral doses. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995;62:604-610.
20. Krinsky N. I.. Actions of carotenoids in biological systems. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1993;13:561-587.[Medline]
21.
Micozzi M. S., Brown E. D., Edwards B. K., Bieri J. G., Taylor P. R., Khachik F., Beecher G. R., Smith J. C., Jr. Plasma carotenoid response to chronic intake of selected foods and ß-carotene supplements in men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1992;55:1120-1125.
22. . Netherlands Food and Nutrition Council. Recommended Dietary Allowances 1989 in The Netherlands 1992 Netherlands Food and Nutrition Council The Hague, The Netherlands.. .
23. Olson J.A.. Absorption, transport, and metabolism of carotenoids in humans. Pure Appl. Chem. 1994;66:1011-1016.
24. Osborne D. R., Voogt P.. The analysis of nutrients in foods 1978 Academic Press London, UK.. .
25.
Rock C. L., Swendseid M. E.. Plasma ß-carotene response in humans after meals supplemented with dietary pectin. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1992;55:96-99.
26.
Rock C. L., Lovalvo J. L., Emenhiser C., Ruffin M. T., Flatt S. W., Schwartz S. J.. Bioavailability of ß-carotene is lower in raw than in processed carrots and spinach in women. J. Nutr. 1998;128:913-916.
27. Seddon J. M., Ajani U. A., Sperduto R. D., Hiller R., Blair N., Burton T. C., Farber M. D., Gragoudas E. S., Haller J., Miller D. T., Yannuzzi L. A., Willett W.. Dietary carotenoids, vitamins A, C, and E, and advanced age-related macular degenerationEye Disease Case-Control Study Group. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1994;272:1413-1420.[Abstract]
28.
Siedel J., Hägele E. O., Ziegenhorn J., Wahlefeld A. W.. Reagent for the enzymatic determination of serum total cholesterol with improved lipolytic efficiency. Clin. Chem. 1983;29:1075-1080.
29.
Sies H., Stahl W.. Vitamins E and C, ß-carotene, and other carotenoids as antioxidants. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995;62:1315S-1321S.
30. Stichting NEVO. Dutch nutrient data base 1995 Voorlichtingsbureau voor de Voeding The Hague, The Netherlands.. .
31.
Sullivan D. R., Kruijswijk Z., West C. E., Kohlmeier M., Katan M. B.. Determination of serum triglycerides by an accurate enzymatic method not affected by free glycerol. Clin. Chem. 1985;31:1227-1228.
32. Tamai H., Morinobu T., Murata T., Manago M., Mino M.. 9-cis ß-carotene in human plasma and blood cells after ingestion of ß-carotene. Lipids 1995;30:493-498.[Medline]
33. Törrönen R., Lehmusaho M., Häkkinen S., Hänninen O., Mykkänen H.. Serum ß-carotene response to supplementation with raw carrots, carrot juice or purified ß-carotene in healthy non-smoking women. Nutr. Res. 1996;16:565-575.
34. Van Poppel G.. Epidemiological evidence for ß-carotene in prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996;50:S57-S61.
35. Van Zeben W., Hendriks T. F.. The absorption of carotene from cooked carrots. Zschr. Vitamin Forsch. 1948;19:265-266.
36.
Willett W. C., Stampfer M. J., Underwood B. A., Speizer F. E., Rosner B., Hennekens C. H.. Validation of a dietary questionnaire with plasma carotenoid and
-tocopherol levels. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1983;38:631-639.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. C. Khan, C. E West, S. de Pee, D. Bosch, H. D. Phuong, P. J. Hulshof, H. H. Khoi, H. Verhoef, and J. G. Hautvast The contribution of plant foods to the vitamin A supply of lactating women in Vietnam: a randomized controlled trial Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 1112 - 1120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Tang, J. Qin, G. G Dolnikowski, R. M Russell, and M. A Grusak Spinach or carrots can supply significant amounts of vitamin A as assessed by feeding with intrinsically deuterated vegetables Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2005; 82(4): 821 - 828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Novotny, A. C. Kurilich, S. J. Britz, and B. A. Clevidence Plasma appearance of labeled {beta}-carotene, lutein, and retinol in humans after consumption of isotopically labeled kale J. Lipid Res., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 1896 - 1903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H. Lichtenstein and R. M. Russell Essential Nutrients: Food or Supplements?: Where Should the Emphasis Be? JAMA, July 20, 2005; 294(3): 351 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. A Thurmann, W. Schalch, J.-C. Aebischer, U. Tenter, and W. Cohn Plasma kinetics of lutein, zeaxanthin, and 3-dehydro-lutein after multiple oral doses of a lutein supplement Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2005; 82(1): 88 - 97. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Burke, J. Curran-Celentano, and A. J. Wenzel Diet and Serum Carotenoid Concentrations Affect Macular Pigment Optical Density in Adults 45 Years and Older J. Nutr., May 1, 2005; 135(5): 1208 - 1214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. van Lieshout and S. de Pee Vitamin A equivalency estimates: understanding apparent differences Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2005; 81(4): 943 - 945. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. D. Ribaya-Mercado and J. B. Blumberg Lutein and Zeaxanthin and Their Potential Roles in Disease Prevention J. Am. Coll. Nutr., December 1, 2004; 23(suppl_6): 567S - 587S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J Haskell, K. M Jamil, F. Hassan, J. M Peerson, M I. Hossain, G. J Fuchs, and K. H Brown Daily consumption of Indian spinach (Basella alba) or sweet potatoes has a positive effect on total-body vitamin A stores in Bangladeshi men Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2004; 80(3): 705 - 714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Asai, M. Terasaki, and A. Nagao An Epoxide-Furanoid Rearrangement of Spinach Neoxanthin Occurs in the Gastrointestinal Tract of Mice and In Vitro: Formation and Cytostatic Activity of Neochrome Stereoisomers J. Nutr., September 1, 2004; 134(9): 2237 - 2243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Chitchumroonchokchai, S. J. Schwartz, and M. L. Failla Assessment of Lutein Bioavailability from Meals and a Supplement Using Simulated Digestion and Caco-2 Human Intestinal Cells J. Nutr., September 1, 2004; 134(9): 2280 - 2286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H.-Y. Chung, H. M. Rasmussen, and E. J. Johnson Lutein Bioavailability Is Higher from Lutein-Enriched Eggs than from Supplements and Spinach in Men J. Nutr., August 1, 2004; 134(8): 1887 - 1893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L Molldrem, J. Li, P. W Simon, and S. A Tanumihardjo Lutein and {beta}-carotene from lutein-containing yellow carrots are bioavailable in humans Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2004; 80(1): 131 - 136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. O Dragsted, A. Pedersen, A. Hermetter, S. Basu, M. Hansen, G. R Haren, M. Kall, V. Breinholt, J. J. Castenmiller, J. Stagsted, et al. The 6-a-day study: effects of fruit and vegetables on markers of oxidative stress and antioxidative defense in healthy nonsmokers Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, June 1, 2004; 79(6): 1060 - 1072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. E Upritchard, C. R. Schuurman, A. Wiersma, L. B. Tijburg, S. A. Coolen, P. J Rijken, and S. A Wiseman Spread supplemented with moderate doses of vitamin E and carotenoids reduces lipid peroxidation in healthy, nonsmoking adults Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2003; 78(5): 985 - 992. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Moller, U. Vogel, A. Pedersen, L. O. Dragsted, B. Sandstrom, and S. Loft No Effect of 600 Grams Fruit and Vegetables Per Day on Oxidative DNA Damage and Repair in Healthy Nonsmokers Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2003; 12(10): 1016 - 1022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. E. Jaramillo-Flores, L. Gonzalez-Cruz, M. Cornejo-Mazon, L. Dorantes-Alvarez, G. F. Gutierrez-Lopez, and H. Hernandez-Sanchez Effect of Thermal Treatment on the Antioxidant Activity and Content of Carotenoids and Phenolic Compounds of Cactus Pear Cladodes (Opuntia ficus-indica) Food Science and Technology International, August 1, 2003; 9(4): 271 - 278. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. W.-M. Boileau, A. C. Boileau, and J. W. Erdman Jr Bioavailability of all-trans and cis-Isomers of Lycopene Experimental Biology and Medicine, November 1, 2002; 227(10): 914 - 919. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Miller, J. Humphrey, E. Johnson, E. Marinda, R. Brookmeyer, and J. Katz Why Do Children Become Vitamin A Deficient? J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2867S - 2880. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. E. West, A. Eilander, and M. van Lieshout Consequences of Revised Estimates of Carotenoid Bioefficacy for Dietary Control of Vitamin A Deficiency in Developing Countries J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2920S - 2926. |