![]() |
|
|
Department of International Health and * Department of Biostatistics, The Rollins School of Public Health at Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
2To whom correspondence should be addressed.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: childhood stunting improved growth education fertility food supplements Guatemala
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Studies about nutrition and fertility milestones are limited mainly to
menarche. In North America and Europe, age at menarche has declined by
~3 y since the beginning of this century (Tanner 1968
and 1975
, Zacharias and Wurtman 1969
). This has been
attributed to improvements in the standard of living, including
nutrition (Ostersehlt and Danker Hopfe 1991
,
Prado 1986
, Veronesi and Gueresi, 1994
,
Wolanski, 1985
). Conversely, Chowdhury et al. (1978)
reported delays in the age at menarche in famine/war
situations involving acute food shortages. In a study of a rural Indian
population in Guatemala, Delgado et al. (1985)
found
that taller and heavier girls were more likely to experience earlier
menarche and, more importantly, that an early age at menarche was
associated with earlier marriage. A major limitation of most studies to
date, however, is their cross-sectional study design, which does
not permit inferences of causality (Chowdhury et al. 1978
, Delgado et al. 1985
Frisch 1972
, Frisch and McArthur 1974
, Hillman et al. 1971
, Tanner 1975
, Zacharias et al. 1976
). The only prospective study about menarche is our own
from Guatemala. Girls who were severely stunted at 3 y of age,
defined as height-for-age Z-score
(HAZ)3
< -3 based on the international National Center for Health Statistics
(NCHS)/WHO reference (WHO 1986
), attained menarche
~7 mo later (P < 0.05) than girls who
were not stunted (HAZ > -2) (Khan et al. 1996
).
On the other hand, nutritional supplementation was not associated with
age at menarche (Khan et al. 1995
).
It is not known whether these variations in age at menarche by early
childhood nutrition extend to the timing of first pregnancy and birth,
which are outcomes influenced by biological and social factors. Several
biological factors that may be determined in utero and early in life
may affect future ability to conceive and deliver a healthy newborn and
thereby influence age at first birth. Recently, Lumey and Stein (1997)
, using a retrospective cohort study design, found that
poor nutrition during pregnancy, measured by exposure in utero to the
Dutch Famine of 19441945, did not alter age at menarche or age at
first birth, which led the authors to conclude that in utero exposure
to nutritional deprivation in previously well-nourished women does
not reduce fertility. However, those results must be verified in other
settings, especially those in which malnutrition is common.
Social factors, such as socioeconomic status (SES) and education are
well-known predictors of fertility behavior (Ann et al. 1983
, Castro 1995
, dos Santos Silva and Beral 1997
). Analyses of cross-sectional data from
Demographic and Health Surveys in 26 developing countries found that
greater schooling in women was consistently associated with lower
fertility (Castro 1995
). Some studies show that
education delays the age at first birth across varied settings
(DeWit and Rajulton 1992
, dos Santos Silva and Beral 1997
, Engle and Smidt 1996
, Nath et al. 1999
, Nguyen et al. 1993
). These effects may
be due to the effect of female education on age at marriage, family
size preferences and/or contraceptive use. Although the benefit of
womens education in reducing overall fertility is well known, the
role it plays in the relation between nutrition and fertility
milestones remains unclear.
In summary, although the link between nutrition and fertility has been long debated, no prospective studies have examined how improved nutrition during early childhood influences future reproductive performance. The objectives of this study were twofold: 1) to examine the relationship between early childhood nutrition and the timing of fertility milestones that occur after menarche; and 2) to examine the role of education and the extent to which it modifies the relation between nutrition and fertility milestones in a developing country setting with high rates of malnutrition.
| SUBJECTS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This study is a follow-up of participants in a longitudinal,
community-based, food supplementation trial that was conducted in
eastern Guatemala by the Instituto de Nutrición de Centro
América y Panamá (INCAP) between 1969 and 1977. Four study
villages were stratified by size (two large and two small) and were
randomly allocated to receive either a high energy, high protein
supplement (Atole) or a low energy, no-protein supplement (Fresco).
Atole provided 682 kJ of energy and 11.5 g of protein per cup
(180 mL), whereas Fresco provided 247 kJ per cup and no protein. Both
supplements contained vitamins and minerals and were administered twice
daily. Data on maternal nutrition and on growth and maturation, diet,
illness and psychosocial development of children from birth to 7 y
of age were collected. Additional details about the original
intervention study are described elsewhere (Martorell et al. 1995a
). Since 1988, a series of follow-up studies of the
participants of the original study have been conducted in the same
villages in collaboration with INCAP. This report utilizes data from
the original intervention trial and the 1988 and 1994 follow-up
examinations described below.
A total of 954 women who were born between January 1966 and August 1977 in the four study villages were exposed to supplementation either partially or totally, in utero and during the first 3 y of life in the original trial. Data on HAZ at or around 3 y, paternal illiteracy and SES during early childhood, and SES in 1988, were available for 395 women. Fertility data were available for 61% of this sample (n = 240). Comparison of the final analytical sample with women for whom follow-up data were not available (n = 714) indicated no differences in key variables such as type of supplement, level of stunting, SES during early childhood and paternal illiteracy.
Data collection.
Reproductive histories were collected for all women of reproductive age who were residents of the four study villages between October and December 1994. Trained field workers interviewed women at home using pretested questionnaires. The study protocol received ethical clearance from Emory University and INCAP, and informed consent was obtained from all subjects. Events recalled included age at menarche (to the nearest month), date of first intercourse, all unions and marriages, all pregnancies and their outcomes (abortions, miscarriages, still births and live births) and details of past and current contraceptive use. In addition, data on the highest grade of schooling completed and current marital status were obtained.
Conceptual framework.
We considered a series of successive time intervals among the following
events: menarche, first intercourse, first pregnancy and first birth
(Fig. 1
). In addition, cumulative time intervals (menarche to first birth and
age at first birth) were also considered. We hypothesized that either
the type of supplement and/or severe stunting, both of which are
measures of early childhood nutrition, were the key biological
variables that could influence the timing of all the fertility
outcomes, especially from menarche to first pregnancy (Stein and Kline 1991
). The social variables that we considered were
education (measured either as paternal literacy during early childhood
or the completion of primary school by the study subject) and SES.
Education could influence the timing of first intercourse and/or first
pregnancy, but not menarche. We therefore examined the association
between early childhood nutrition and fertility outcomes in models that
included either the antecedent (paternal literacy and SES during early
childhood) or concurrent (completion of primary schooling and current
SES) social variables. Because there is no variability in the time
interval from first pregnancy to first birth in our data, we used time
to first birth in lieu of first pregnancy.
|
Fertility outcomes. Age at menarche, first intercourse, first pregnancy and first birth were calculated to the nearest month by subtracting the reported date of these events (month, year) from the date of birth in the original longitudinal study. More than 90% of the first pregnancies were first births and time from first pregnancy to first birth was 9 mo for 95% of first births. Therefore, time to first pregnancy was not considered, due to lack of variability. The main outcome variables were the time intervals from menarche to first intercourse and from first intercourse to first birth. We also considered cumulative outcomes about menarche and first birth, i.e., time from menarche to first birth and age at first birth.
Atole. This was defined as a dichotomous variable to indicate the type of nutrition intervention received during early childhood (1 if Atole, 0 if Fresco).
Severe stunting.
If present at 3 y of age, this was used as a cumulative measure of
childhood nutritional status. Poor linear growth or stunting is the
best summary measure of chronic exposure to poor diet, high rates of
infection and inadequate care during early childhood (UNICEF 1990
). Previous analyses have shown that nearly all growth
retardation in our study population occurred by age 3 y
(Martorell et al. 1995b
). Length measurements, obtained
prospectively during early childhood in the original longitudinal
study, were expressed as HAZ using the international NCHS/WHO reference
(WHO 1986
). For women who did not have a length
measurement at exactly 3 y, the next best measurement between 24
and 48 mo of age was selected, following an algorithm that has been
used in previous analyses (Schroeder et al. 1995
).
Severe stunting was defined as a HAZ < -3.
Socioeconomic status (SES).
SES during early childhood and adulthood were expressed as separate
scores derived from principal components analysis in previous studies
from data on household characteristics and possessions that were
collected during 1975 and 1988, respectively (Rivera et al. 1995
).
Paternal illiteracy. This factor was based on whether the father could read or write at the time of the 19691977 longitudinal study. The level of education for the subjects mother was not used because of the extremely low prevalence and resulting lack of variability.
Schooling.
This was categorized as "completed primary school" if the highest
grade of schooling completed was
6 y. Examination of the effect of
schooling on fertility milestones as a continuous variable, i.e., years
of schooling, indicated a strong threshold effect at ~6 y, i.e.,
completion of primary school.
Data analysis.
Survival analysis techniques were used to account for right censoring
(Fleming and Harrington 1991
). Median values obtained
from Kaplan-Meier curves were used to compare the timing of
fertility outcomes within strata of the independent variables of
interest. Cox proportional hazard models were fitted to examine the
effect of the nutrition intervention (Atole vs. Fresco) and severe
stunting on the successive and cumulative time intervals, adjusting for
the following effects: 1) paternal literacy and SES
measured during early childhood and, 2) completion of
primary school by the subject and current SES. All analyses were
restricted to those women who had attained the prior milestone (all
women had experienced menarche). In addition, we adjusted for the age
at the prior milestone in all analyses except that for age at first
birth (Brewster et al. 1998
). For example, we controlled
for age at first intercourse in the model for time from first
intercourse to first birth. In the analysis of age at first birth,
however, we also controlled for age at menarche. We examined
interactions between type of supplement and education, and between
severe stunting and education. Because the unit of randomization in the
original intervention trial was the village, the responses of
individuals within a village are likely to be correlated. Therefore,
robust variance estimators (Lipsitz et al. 1994
) were
used to obtain P-values for the parameter estimates in
the proportional hazard models in the overall analysis, which pools all
four villages. All analyses were performed using SAS (1997)
and S-plus software (MathSoft 1996
).
All tests were two-tailed, and a P-value
0.05 was considered to indicate significance. Missing data were assumed
to be missing at random (Rubin 1987
).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Comparison of key outcomes by type of supplement (Table 2
) indicates that the median time intervals from menarche to first
intercourse and from first intercourse to first birth were 1.68 and
0.06 y shorter among those who received Atole than those who
received Fresco; median age at first birth was 1.17 y earlier.
However, there were strong between-village differences, especially
for the time from menarche to first intercourse, and from menarche to
first birth. Specifically, all fertility outcomes were significantly
delayed in the small Fresco village. In this village, only 42 and 38%
of women had experienced first intercourse and first birth,
respectively. The median interval from menarche to first intercourse
was 0.5 y earlier among those who were not severely stunted
compared with those who were. A similar difference was seen for the
time from menarche to first birth. Median age at first birth was
1.04 y earlier among those who were not severely stunted compared
with those who were. These differences, however, were not significant
(P = 0.25).
|
After adjusting for concurrent covariates (current SES and completion
of primary schooling), the hazard ratio for Atole for time from
menarche to first intercourse was 1.98 [95% confidence interval
(CI):1.38, 2.84]. Adjustment for antecedent covariates (parental
literacy and SES during early childhood) yielded similar estimates
(Table 3
). The hazard ratio for the time from first intercourse to first birth
was 1.12 (95% CI: 1.10, 1.23), adjusting for the concurrent
covariates. The adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) for the cumulative time
intervals (time from menarche to first birth and age at first birth)
were similar to those reported for the time from menarche to first
intercourse. There were no significant interactions between type of
supplement and education.
|
There was a significant interaction between education and severe
stunting during early childhood for time from menarche to first
intercourse but not for time from first intercourse to first birth.
Better growth, i.e., not being severely stunted at or around 3 y
of age, led to earlier milestones only among women with illiterate
fathers (Table 4
). The effect of paternal literacy in delaying fertility milestones was
greater among those who were not severely stunted during early
childhood. The median time from menarche to first intercourse was
2.75 y greater for subjects with literate fathers compared with
those with illiterate fathers among those not severely stunted during
early childhood. The difference associated with paternal illiteracy was
only 0.42 y among those who were severely stunted during early
childhood. Similar results were seen for time from menarche to first
birth and age at first birth. Completion of primary schooling by women
in the study increased the time from menarche to first intercourse,
with a larger effect among those who were severely stunted during early
childhood. Similar effects were seen for the cumulative time intervals.
Overall, completing primary schooling delayed the median age at first
birth by at least 3 y.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lumey and Stein (1997)
, found that poor nutrition in
utero (measured by ecological exposure to famine) did not affect age at
first birth in Dutch women. However, several differences in study
design (natural experiment vs. intervention trial; in utero vs. in
utero and early childhood exposure), study setting (differences in the
prevalence of malnutrition and other social factors that determine
fertility milestones such as age at first birth) and age at
follow-up (older vs. younger) between the two studies may account
for these differences between that study and ours.
Earlier work by Khan et al. (1995)
found no significant
effects of the type of supplement consumed during early childhood on
age at menarche. The current findings, however, show that women who had
received Atole in utero and/or during early childhood experienced first
intercourse or first birth at an earlier age than those who received
Fresco, even after adjusting for socioeconomic status and paternal
illiteracy during early childhood. The effect of type of supplement was
seen for both times, i.e., time from menarche to first intercourse and
time from first intercourse to first birth. The effect of
supplementation may be due in part to village-level differences in
other known and unknown nonnutritional or behavioral/cultural factors.
Our results show that although age at menarche was similar across
villages, the more culturally determined fertility milestones, such as
the time interval from menarche to first intercourse, were
significantly later in the small Fresco village. Earlier work has also
shown that this village is quite distinct both socially and
ecologically from the other villages (Bergeron 1993
). This village had a strong tradition of higher
schooling that dates back to even before the intervention study. Both
paternal literacy and completion of primary schooling were the highest
in this village. Unfortunately, we lack the data to examine
conclusively whether these village-level differences in fertility
milestones existed before the original intervention study. Although the
village-level allocation of treatment was appropriately accounted
for in our analysis, the small sample size (two pairs of villages)
limits our ability to control for these inherent village-level
differences.
In the case of severe stunting, previous work by Khan et al. (1996)
using data from the same INCAP cohort, found a
difference of ~7 mo in the mean age at menarche between subjects who
were severely stunted (HAZ < -3) at 3 y of age compared
with those who were not stunted (HAZ > -2). However, we found a
smaller nonsignificant difference (3 mo; P = 0.1), which may be due to the small sample size and the fact
that we compared two groups, i.e., severely stunted or not, instead of
three groups as in Khan et al. (1996)
.
Our results demonstrate the importance of social determinants,
especially education, in delaying fertility milestones. Paternal
literacy was associated with a longer time from menarche to first
intercourse, but was not associated with earlier first birth after
adjusting for other covariates. Completion of primary school had a
larger effect and significantly delayed the timing of first intercourse
and first birth, even after adjusting for socioeconomic status and age
at menarche. It should be noted, however, that schooling delayed only
the time to first intercourse from menarche, but not the time to first
birth from first intercourse. Contraceptive use was extremely low in
this population, which may explain the lack of effect of schooling on
the second interval. The other reason may be related to the accuracy of
recall of age at first intercourse. The interval from first intercourse
to first birth is short, suggesting that women may have reported age at
first intercourse based on the timing of first pregnancy and/or birth.
Age at menarche was not associated with completion of primary school,
which suggests that it is unlikely that early maturers dropped out of
school earlier; rather, we hypothesize that either better school
performance or staying in school longer were associated with a reduced
risk of having sex. This finding is consistent with previous studies
that have examined the role of social factors in predicting fertility
milestones (Ann et al. 1983
, Castro 1995
,
dos Santos Silva and Beral 1997
, Engle and Smidt 1996
).
A major contribution of our study is evidence of a strong interaction between early childhood stunting and education. Our findings suggest that the observed effect of stunting on time from menarche to first intercourse may also be due to behavioral rather than biological mechanisms. Better growth led to earlier outcomes only among those whose fathers were illiterate, suggesting familial influences. On the other hand, shorter girls who remain in school may be perceived as being less attractive and less mature for childbearing, and therefore have later outcomes.
In summary, this paper suggests that improved nutrition, especially
food supplementation during early childhood, results in earlier
attainment of fertility milestones. However, these effects may be
countered by social factors, especially education. The effect of
completing primary school in delaying fertility milestones was larger
in magnitude than that of improving nutrition. Because they come from
only one setting and are based on relative small samples, these
findings should be considered with caution, and more work is required
to improve our understanding of the underlying biological and social
mechanisms that explain the sequence of events that lead from early
childhood to age at first birth. In the meantime, programs that aim to
improve early childhood nutrition should be implemented in conjunction
with efforts to make sure that every child attends and stays in school.
It should also be noted that earlier work has shown that
"educability," i.e., performance on tests of knowledge, numeracy,
reading and vocabulary that were administered during adolescence,
improved among those who received Atole compared with Fresco, while
controlling for the level of schooling (Pollitt et al. 1995
). To benefit from improved educability, investments in
education such as the provision of good schools as well as improving
the availability of family planning services would be required to see
long-term benefits. In conclusion, the combination of improved
nutrition and better education will result not only in later fertility
milestones, but also healthier and better-nurtured children.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
3 Abbreviations used: AHR, adjusted hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; HAZ, height-for-age Z-score; INCAP,
Instituto de Nutrición de Centro América y Panamá;
NCHS, National Center for Health Statistics; SES, socioeconomic status. ![]()
Manuscript received April 5, 1999. Initial review completed May 20, 1999. Revision accepted August 24, 1999.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Ann T. B., Othman R., Butz W. P., DaVanzo J. Age at menarche in peninsular Malaysia: time, ethnic differentials and association with ages at marriage and at first birth. Malays, J. Reprod. Health 1983;1:91-108
2. Balakrishnan T. R, Rao K. V., Krotki K. J., Lapierre-Adamcyk E. Age at first birth and lifetime fertility. J. Biosoc. Sci. 1988;20:167-174[Medline]
3. Bergeron G. Social and economic development in four Ladino communities of eastern Guatemala. A comparative description. Food Nutr. Bull. 1993;14:221-236
4.
Bongaarts J. Does malnutrition affect fecundity?. A summary of evidence. Science (Washington, DC) 1980;208:564-569
5. Brewster K. L., Cooksey E. C., Guilkey D. K., Rindfuss R. R. The changing impact of religion on sexual and contraceptive behavior of adolescent women in the United States. J. Marriage Fam. 1998;60:493-504
6. Castro M. T. Womens education and fertility: results from 26 Demographic and Health Surveys. Stud. Fam. Plann. 1995;26:187-202[Medline]
7. Chowdhury A.K.M.A., Huffman S. L., Curlin G. T. Malnutrition, menarche and marriage in rural Bangladesh. Soc. Biol. 1978;24:316-325
8. Delgado H. L, Hurtado E., Valverde V. Physical growth, age at menarche and age at first union in rural Guatemala. Ecol. Food Nutr. 1985;16:127-133
9. DeWit M. L., Rajulton F. Education and timing of parenthood among Canadian women: a cohort analysis. Soc. Biol. 1992;39:109-122[Medline]
10. dos Santos Silva I., Beral V. Socioeconomic differences in reproductive behavior. IARC Sci. Publ. 1997;138:285-308
11. Engle P. L., Smidt R. K. Influences of Adolescent Childbearing and Marital Status at First Birth on Rural Guatemalan Women and Children 1996 The Population Council New York, N.Y. International Center for Research on Women, Washington DC.
12. Fleming T. R., Harrington D. P. Counting Processes and Survival Analysis 1991 John Wiley & Sons New York, NY.
13. Freedman D. S., Thornton A., Wallisch L. Age at first birth and family size: evidence from a longitudinal study. Soc. Biol. 1981;28:217-227[Medline]
14.
Frisch R. Weight at menarche: similarities for well nourished and undernourished girls at different ages and evidence for historical constancy. Pediatrics 1972;50:445-450
15.
Frisch R. E., McArthur J. W. Menstrual cycle: fatness as a determinant of minimum weight for height necessary for their maintenance or onset. Science (Washington, DC) 1974;185:949-951
16. Hillman R. W., Slater P., Nelson M. J. Season of birth, parental age menarcheal age and body form: some interrelationships in young women. Hum. Biol. 1971;42:570-580
17. Khan A. D., Schroeder D. G., Martorell R., Haas J. D., Rivera J. Early childhood determinants of age at menarche in rural Guatemala. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 1996;8:717-723
18. Khan A. D., Schroeder D. G., Martorell R., Rivera J. A. Age at menarche and nutritional supplementation. J Nutr 1995;125:1090S-1096S
19. Lipsitz S. T., Dear K.B.G., Zhao L. Jacknife estimators of variance for parameter estimates from estimating equations with applications to clustered survival data. Biometrics 1994;50:842-846[Medline]
20.
Lumey L. H., Stein A. D. In utero exposure to famine and subsequent fertility: the Dutch Famine Birth Cohort Study. Am. J. Pub. Health. 1997;87:1962-1966
21. Macro International Inc Guatemala 1987: results from the demographic and health survey. Stud. Fam. Plann. 1990;21:55-59[Medline]
22. Martorell R. The role of nutrition in economic development. Nutr. Rev. 1996;54:S66-S71[Medline]
23. Martorell R., Delgado H. L., Valverde V., Klein R. E. Maternal stature, fertility and infant mortality. Hum. Biol. 1981;53:303-312[Medline]
24. Martorell R., Habicht J.-P., Rivera J. A. History and design of the INCAP longitudinal study (196977) and its follow up (198889). J. Nutr. 1995;125:1027S-1041S
25. Martorell R., Schroeder D. G., Rivera J. A., Kaplowitz H. A. Patterns of linear growth in rural Guatemalan adolescents and children. J. Nutr. 1995;125:1068S-1077S
26. MathSoft Inc. (1996) S-Plus Software, Version 3.4. MathSci, Seattle, WA.
27.
Morabia A., Constanza M. C. World Health Organization collaborative study of neoplasia and steroid contraceptives. International variability in ages at menarche, first livebirth and menopause. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998;148:1195-1205
28. Nath D. C., Land K. C., Goswami G. Effects of the status of women on the first-birth interval in Indian urban society. J. Biosoc. Sci. 1999;31:55-69[Medline]
29. Nguyen L., Nguyen M. T., Swenson I., Pham B. S. Selected determinants of fertility in Vietnam: age at marriage, marriage to first birth interval and age at first birth. J. Biosoc. Sci. 1993;25:303-310[Medline]
30. Ostersehlt D., Danker Hopfe H. Changes in age at menarche in Germany: evidence for a continuing decline. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 1991;3:647-654
31. Pollitt E., Gorman K. S., Engle P. L., Rivera J. A., Martorell R. Nutrition in early life and the fulfillment of intellectual potential. J. Nutr. 1995;125:1111S-1118S
32. Prado C. Secular change and genetic influence in the menarcheal age. Acta Med. Auxol. (Milan) 1986;18:117-121
33. Rahman M. The effect of child mortality on fertility regulation in rural Bangladesh. Stud. Fam. Plann. 1998;29:268-281[Medline]
34. Rivera J., Flores M., Martorell R., Ramakrishnan U., Melgar P. Generational effects of supplementary feeding during early childhood. Battaglia F. Falkner F. Garza C. Salle B. Rey J. eds. 5th International Workshop on Maternal and Extrauterine Nutritional Factors. Their Influence on Fetal and Infant Growth, Universidad de Salamanca, Spain 1996:197-204 Ediciones Ergon Madrid, Spain.
35. Rivera J., Martorell R., Ruel M., Habicht J.-P., Haas J. D. Nutritional supplementation during the preschool years influences body size and composition of Guatemalan adolescents. J. Nutr. 1995;125:1078S-1089S
36. Rubin D. B. Multiple Imputation for Nonresponse in Surveys 1987 John Wiley & Sons New York, NY.
37. SAS Institute Inc. (1997) SAS/STAT Software: Change and Enhancements through Release 6.12. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
38. Schroeder D. G., Martorell R., Rivera J., Ruel M., Habicht J.-P. Age differences in the impact of nutritional supplementation on growth. J. Nutr. 1995;125:1051S-1067S
39. Stein A. D., Kline J. Pre-pregnant body size and spontaneous abortion of known karyotype. Early Hum. Dev. 1991;25:173-180[Medline]
40. Tanner J. M. Earlier maturation in man. Sci. Am. 1968;218:21-27[Medline]
41. Tanner J. M. Age at menarche. Evidence of the rate of human maturation 1975unpublished paper presented at a meeting of the British Society for Population Studies, London School of Economics, England.
42. United Nations International Childrens Emergency Fund Strategy for improved nutrition of children and women in developing countries 1990 UNICEF New York, NY.
43. Veronesi F. M., Gueresi P. Trend in menarcheal age and socioeconomic influence in Bologna (Northern Italy). Ann. Hum. Biol. 1994;21:187-196[Medline]
44. Wolanski N. Secular trend, secular changes or long-term adaptational fluctuations?. Acta Med. Auxol. (Milan) 1985;17:7-19
45. World Health Organization Use and interpretation of anthropometric indicators of nutritional status, WHO Working Group. Bull. WHO 1986;64:929-941[Medline]
46. Zacharias L. W., Rand W. M., Wurtman R. A prospective study of sexual development and growth in American girls: the statistics of menarche. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 1976;31:325-337[Medline]
47. Zacharias L. W., Wurtman R. Age at menarche: genetic and environmental influences. N. Engl. J. Med. 1969;280:868-875
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Uauy and N. Solomons Diet, Nutrition, and the Life-Course Approach to Cancer Prevention J. Nutr., December 1, 2005; 135(12): 2934S - 2945S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. G. Elias, P. A.H. van Noord, P. H.M. Peeters, I. den Tonkelaar, and D. E. Grobbee Childhood exposure to the 1944-1945 Dutch famine and subsequent female reproductive function Hum. Reprod., September 1, 2005; 20(9): 2483 - 2488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Li, H. X. Barnhart, A. D. Stein, and R. Martorell Effects of Early Childhood Supplementation on the Educational Achievement of Women Pediatrics, November 1, 2003; 112(5): 1156 - 1162. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||