Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turunen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dallner, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turunen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dallner, G.
(Journal of Nutrition. 1999;129:2113-2118.)
© 1999 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Article

Blood Concentration of Coenzyme Q10 Increases in Rats When Esterified Forms Are Administered1

Mikael Turunen*2, Eeva-Liisa Appelkvist{dagger}, Pavel Sindelar** and Gustav Dallner*

* Department of Biochemistry, Stockholm University, S-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden and {dagger} Clinical Research Center and ** Department of Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, S-171 76, Stockholm, Sweden

2To whom correspondence should be addressed.


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Coenzyme Q levels decrease during aging in most tissues and in the target organs of a number of diseases. The uptake of this lipid into the blood and other tissues was investigated in 6-wk-old male Sprague-Dawley rats after 3 wk of dietary supplementation. In addition to the natural form of coenzyme Q10, acetylated and succinylated forms were also administered. Coenzyme Q10 was taken up into the blood, but uptake was significantly greater in rats given the succinylated (~40%), and particularly, the acetylated forms (~70%). All three forms increased significantly the total coenzyme Q concentration in both the liver (~100%) and spleen (~130%). Coenzyme Q10 and its esterified forms were not taken up into kidney, heart, muscle or brain. Intraportal and intraperitoneal administration of succinylated coenzyme Q10 gave results similar to those obtained in the dietary experiments. Uptake of the dietary coenzyme Q10 into the liver and spleen did not down-regulate the endogenous synthesis, i.e., the amounts of isolated coenzyme Q9 did not change in these tissues. Thus, esterification of coenzyme Q increases the uptake of dietary lipid into the blood; however, the derivatization does not contribute to the elevation of coenzyme Q levels in various organs.


KEY WORDS: • coenzyme Q • rats • blood lipids • aging


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Coenzyme Q (CoQ) is present in all tissues and membranes in highly variable amounts (Ernster and Dallner 1995Citation ). Three main functions are attributed to this lipid, depending on distribution and concentration. It is a redox component of the mitochondrial respiratory chain; this electron carrier role was considered for a long time to be its only function (Trumpower 1990Citation ). However, its broad distribution provides a clue to its additional cellular role as the only endogenously synthesized lipid-soluble antioxidant (Ernster 1993Citation ). CoQ is highly efficient in preventing lipid, protein and DNA oxidation, and it is continuously regenerated by intracellular reduction systems (Andrée et al. 1998Citation ). In liposomes and in a mixture consisting of lipoproteins, it was demonstrated that CoQ is preferentially utilized as an antioxidant when both this lipid and {alpha}-tocopherol are available (Frei et al. 1990Citation , Stocker et al. 1991Citation ). In model membranes, CoQ destabilizes membranes and increases fluidity and permeability (Quinn and Katsikas 1985Citation ).

The tissue concentration of CoQ changes in physiologic processes such as during exercise and cold acclimation (Beyer et al. 1962Citation , Mataix et al. 1997Citation ). Its amount decreases in cardiomyopathy, degenerative muscle diseases, hepatocellular cancer and in most tissues during aging (Eggens et al. 1989Citation , Kalén et al. 1989Citation , Karlsson et al. 1990Citation , Mortensen 1993Citation ). In neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s and prion disease, its concentration is significantly elevated in the brain (Guan et al. 1996Citation , Söderberg et al. 1990Citation ). In some pathologic processes, when tissue CoQ content is decreased, it may be advantageous to supplement CoQ by dietary administration. Exogenously administered CoQ10 has an important function in the blood when free radical production is elevated, such as in ischemia-reperfusion syndrome, inflammation and conditions in which cholesterol and cholesterol ester oxidation occurs (Haramaki et al. 1998Citation , Tribble et al. 1994Citation , Upston et al. 1997Citation ).

In both experimental and human studies, dietary CoQ10 has been shown to be taken up into the blood and distributed in LDL and HDL (Elmberger et al. 1989Citation , Mohr and Stocker 1994Citation ). Uptake into the liver is also substantial. Conversely, uptake into the kidney, heart, muscle and brain does not occur in rats administered CoQ10 (Alessandri et al. 1988Citation , Lönnrot et al. 1998Citation , Reahal and Wrigglesworth 1992Citation , Zhang et al. 1995Citation and 1996Citation ). However, in a recent study, it was found that CoQ10 is taken up into the brain; in addition, the exogenous lipid also greatly elevates the concentration of endogenously synthesized CoQ9 (Matthews et al. 1998Citation ).

The role of {alpha}-tocopherol as a lipid-soluble antioxidant is well documented, and the efficiency of the uptake process can be greatly elevated by derivatization of this vitamin (Burton et al. 1988Citation ). Our aim was to investigate the possible improvement of CoQ10 uptake after esterification and administration of the acetylated and succinylated forms. It appeared possible to perform experiments by analyzing lipids with the available HPLC methodology because it can separate the CoQ9 (endogenous) and CoQ10 (dietary) species. Our purpose was to establish whether derivatization increases the uptake into the blood and whether these derivatives are taken up by various organs. Because the major part of CoQ in all tissues is synthesized by the tissues themselves, uptake of exogenous lipid may down-regulate this biosynthetic process by a feedback mechanism, if the exogenous lipid is distributed into appropriate compartments. If down-regulation of endogenous synthesis occurs, dietary administration of CoQ would not be meaningful. Therefore, the endogenous CoQ9 synthesized during dietary treatment is of considerable interest.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and diets.

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (Anticimex, Stockholm, Sweden) were used. The diet was composed of cereal products (barley, wheat feed, wheat, corn germ), vegetable proteins (high protein soybean), animal proteins (Chilean fish meal) and a vitamin mixture.3 The CoQ concentration in this diet was < 0.1 mg/kg. The CoQ-enriched diet contained one of the following: CoQ10 (Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO) (1g/kg diet), acetylated CoQ10 (1 g/kg diet) or succinylated CoQ10 (1 g/kg diet). Diacetylated and disuccinylated CoQ10 were synthesized according to Okamoto et al. 1985Citation and provided to us by E. Blackedal (Vulpes, Göteborg, Sweden). The chemical structures of CoQ10 and its acetylated and succinylated forms are shown in Figure 1Citation . The purity and identity of these compounds were verified by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry and 1H and 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (Vulpes). The ethics committee of the university approved the experiments in this study.



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The chemical structure of 6-decaprenyl-2–3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-1–4-benzoquinone (CoQ10) R = H, (upper structure), succinylated CoQ10 (middle structure) and acetylated CoQ10 (lower structure).

 
Experiment 1.

Rats (6 wk old), weighing 180 ± 6 g, were divided randomly into four groups. The control group received the basal diet. The diet mixed with CoQ10 was given to the second group. The third group received the acetylated CoQ10, and the fourth group was given succinylated CoQ10 mixed into the diet. All groups had free access to their respective diets, and the treatments were continued for 3 wk. At the end of the treatment, body weights were measured; the mean weight of rats in both the control and treated groups increased to 320 ± 10 g. Rats were decapitated and liver, kidney, heart, muscle, brain and spleen were removed and stored at -20°C for later analysis. Blood was taken for the preparation of plasma.

Experiment 2.

Rats weighing 180 ± 6 g were divided into three groups and given free access to the basal diet. The first group was the control rats. The second group received succinylated CoQ10 by intraportal administration. The rats were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection of 0.1 mL Mebumal (60 mg/mL) per 100 g body weight. The succinylated CoQ10 (10 mg) was mixed with 0.3 mL Intralipid (Pharmacia & Upjohn, Uppsala, Sweden) by sonication and injected into the portal vein. After 30 min, the rats were decapitated, blood was collected, and the heart and liver removed. The third group of rats was injected intraperitoneally with succinylated CoQ10, prepared as described above. Three injections were made at 12-h intervals (3.3 mg succinylated CoQ10 each time, dissolved in Intralipid) and the rats were decapitated 12 h after the last injection. Blood, heart and liver samples were removed.

Experiment 3.

Male Sprague-Dawley rats (12 mo old), weighing 420 ± 5 g, were divided into two groups. The first group was the control and the second group received CoQ10 for 3 wk as described in Experiment 1. The weight of both groups increased to 435 ± 6 g. Rats were decapitated and liver, kidney, muscle, spleen, heart and brain were removed; blood was taken for the preparation of plasma.

Preparation of hepatic subfractions.

Livers were homogenized in 0.25 mol/L sucrose with three strokes in a Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer at 440 rpm The homogenate was then centrifuged at 300 x g for 10 min. The resulting supernatant, called "300 x g supernatant" was centrifuged at 6000 x g for 20 min. The pellet (mitochondria) was washed three times and resuspended in 0.25 mol/L sucrose (1 g liver/mL). The supernatant after the 6000 x g centrifugation was collected and named "postmitochondrial supernatant."

Lipid extraction.

Tissues were homogenized in 0.25 mol/L sucrose in an Ultra Turrax blender (IKA Labortechnik, Staufen, Germany). One milliliter of homogenate, hepatic subfraction or blood was supplemented with 10 nmol CoQ6 (Sigma Chemical) as an internal standard. Samples were then extracted with 18 mL methanol and 12 mL petroleum ether (boiling point 40–60°C) as described by Åberg et al. 1992Citation . After extensive vortex treatment for 30 s, the petroleum ether phase was collected and evaporated under N2. The residue was dissolved in 50 µL chloroform/methanol (2:1) and stored at 4°C in the dark. The samples were analyzed 20 h later by HPLC (Shimadzu LC-10A system, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). At the time of measurement, all of the CoQ was in an oxidized form.

Analysis of CoQ by HPLC.

Analyses were carried out using a reversed-phase ODS Hypersil C18, 3-µm column (Hewlett-Packard, Böblingen, Germany) as described by Ericsson et al. 1991Citation . CoQ levels were quantified by employing a linear gradient starting from methanol/water (9:1) (solvent A) to methanol/2-propanol/n-hexane (2:1:1) (solvent B) with a program time of 45 min and a 1.5 mL/min flow rate according to Ericsson et al. 1992Citation . The absorption was monitored with a UV detector (Waters model 490, Millipore, Bedford, MA) at 210 and 275 nm. CoQ9 and CoQ10 were identified with standards and by reduction of the isolated fractions with sodium borohydride. With HPLC, CoQ9 and CoQ10 exhibited a baseline separation, and detection at 275 nm did not result in coelution of other disturbing substances (Fig. 2Citation ). The elution time for CoQ9 and CoQ10 was 18 and 22 min, respectively.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Analysis of CoQ from rat tissues with HPLC using UV absorption at 275 nm. Lipid extract from rat spleen after 3 wk administration of basal diet (panel A) or succinylated CoQ10-enriched diet (1 g/kg diet) for 3 wk (panel B). CoQ6 = coenzyme Q6; CoQ9 = coenzyme Q9; CoQ10 = coenzyme Q10; SCoQ10 = succinylated coenzyme Q10.

 
Statistical analysis.

Data are presented as means ± SEM. The differences between the two groups (Tables 1Citation and 2)Citation were evaluated by Student’s t test. For comparison of several groups or for repeated comparisons to a single control group (Figs. 3Citation and 4)Citation , ANOVA and Dunnett’s post-hoc test were used. The statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Instat Version 3.01 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Differences were considered significant at P < 0.001 after Bonferroni correction.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Uptake of succinylated CoQ10 into rat tissues after intraportal and intraperitoneal administration12

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. CoQ10 concentration in tissues of 12-mo-old rats after 3 wks of CoQ10 intake12

 


View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Uptake of CoQ10 by blood and liver (A), brain and heart (B), kidney, muscle and spleen (C) of rats fed 1 g/kg diet CoQ10, acetylated CoQ10 (ACoQ10) or succinylated CoQ10 (SCoQ10) in the diet for 3 wk. Values are the means ± SEM, n = 9. *Significantly different from control (P < 0.001). **Significantly different from all other treatments within the same tissue (P < 0.001). For experimental procedure, see Experiment 1 in Materials and Methods.

 


View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Mitochondrial uptake of dietary CoQ10 in liver of rats fed 1 g/kg diet CoQ10, acetylated CoQ10 (ACoQ10) or succinylated CoQ10 (SCoQ10) in the diet for 3 wk. (A) Distribution of endogenous CoQ10. (B) Distribution of dietary CoQ10 and its esterified forms. The values are the means ± SEM, n = 6. *Significantly different from control (P < 0.001). For experimental procedure, see Experiment 1 in Materials and Methods.

 

    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Efficient uptake of CoQ10 and its derivatives into the blood was observed with all three types of CoQ (Fig. 3ACitation ). The endogenous CoQ10 level in the control group was 51.6 nmol/L and increased to 1440.6 nmol/L when the nonderivatized lipid was consumed. Rats fed acetylated CoQ10 had blood concentrations exceeding 2240 nmol/L (P < 0.001). The succinylated derivative was absorbed less efficiently than the acetylated form, but the uptake was 40% higher than that of the nonderivatized CoQ. The uptake of CoQ10 into the liver was also highly efficient. The concentration in the liver of control rats was 3.8 nmol/g, whereas in rats fed CoQ10, the concentration was 146 nmol/g (Fig. 3ACitation ). Both the acetylated and succinylated forms of CoQ10 were efficiently taken up by the liver, but in contrast to the situation in the blood, the derivatization did not further increase the uptake levels. In both blood and the liver, endogenous CoQ10 did not represent more than ~10% of the total. Because administration of an exogenous substance may influence the biosynthetic rate of the endogenous lipid, the level of CoQ9, was determined. Administration of CoQ10 or its esterified derivatives did not affect the endogenous CoQ9 concentration in the blood or the liver.

In brain and heart, dietary treatment had no effect on the endogenous CoQ10 concentration (Fig. 3BCitation ). The dietary treatments did not influence the endogenous CoQ9 concentrations in either the brain or the heart, where this lipid species comprises 60 and 90% of the total, respectively.

In kidney and muscle, no uptake was observed upon administration of CoQ10 or its esterified forms (Fig. 3CCitation ). However, the rats treated with dietary CoQ10 had an eightfold greater concentration of this lipid in the spleen than did the nontreated control. The levels in rats administered the acetylated and succinylated forms were similar. The spleen is a blood-rich organ; however, this does not explain the relatively high level of CoQ10 after dietary treatment. The endogenous CoQ9 concentration in muscle, kidney and spleen tissue made up 90, 80 and 70% of the total, respectively, but administration of CoQ10 or its derivatized forms did not affect the level of the CoQ9.

The presence of acetylated and succinylated forms of CoQ10 in blood and organs was analyzed with HPLC because these derivatives have a shorter elution time than that of the nonderivatized form. In blood, ~5% of the total uptake of the lipid could be identified as the derivative, whereas in liver and spleen, no succinylated or acetylated forms were detected (not shown). Esterases present in both blood and various tissues appear to efficiently hydrolyze the derivatized forms of CoQ10.

The intracellular localization of exogenous CoQ10 was investigated by fractionation of the liver homogenate. In liver of the controls, mitochondria represented the largest membranous cellular compartment; ~80% of the total cellular CoQ10 was present in mitochondria, whereas the remainder was distributed in the other subcellular membranes, present in the postmitochondrial supernatant (Fig. 4ACitation ). A similar distribution pattern was also found for CoQ9 (not shown). Treatment of rats with CoQ10 or its acetylated or succinylated forms increased the lipid concentration in both mitochondria and the postmitochondrial supernatant. However, this elevation was greater in the latter fraction than in the mitochondria (Fig. 4BCitation ). Thus, the CoQ distribution pattern (CoQ9 and CoQ10) in these two compartments after treatment was the opposite of that found in the control rats, and the majority of the CoQ10 was distributed in the extramitochondrial compartment.

We investigated whether the route of administration is the main cause of restricted uptake of CoQ10 into blood, liver and spleen but not into other organs. For this reason, succinylated CoQ10 was injected directly into the portal vein instead of peroral administration (Table 1Citation ). In the liver, the concentration of CoQ10 was six times greater than that in the control group after 30 min, but in the heart, no detectable uptake of this lipid was observed. In rats given intraperitoneal injections of succinylated CoQ10, efficient uptake into the liver was found, and the lipid concentration was eight times greater than that in controls. Again, this administration method did not affect the CoQ10 concentration of the heart.

The possibility was tested that in older rats, which have a lower concentration of CoQ in most organs compared with younger ones, the lack of optimal tissue concentration may activate the uptake mechanism and the lipid would be more easily absorbed from the diet (Table 2Citation ). The CoQ10 concentration in blood was ~20 times greater in the CoQ10-supplemented group than in controls. In the liver, the elevation was 30-fold, whereas in the spleen, the lipid concentration was eight times higher in the treated rats. In brain, heart, kidney and muscle, the lipid concentration in the two groups did not differ, showing the lack of uptake from the diet. Also, the endogenous CoQ9 levels were unchanged in all tissues investigated. The results obtained with the older rats are similar to those described for the younger rats in Figure 3Citation , demonstrating that uptake of dietary CoQ10 is not age dependent.


    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The role of CoQ in cellular metabolism and in the prevention of oxidative damage indicates that a lowering of the tissue concentration is one of the etiological factors of development of a number of diseases (Ernster and Dallner 1995Citation ). In contrast to other neutral lipids, this lipid decreases with aging in most organs in both experimental systems and humans (Beyer et al. 1985Citation , Kalén et al. 1989Citation ). Lowered concentration may appear in a number of tissues in various diseases but is most often observed in the heart and muscle. Because the two main lipid-soluble antioxidants of the blood are {alpha}-tocopherol and CoQ, it is not surprising that both of these antioxidants efficiently prevent oxidative stress-induced damage in conditions such as ischemia-reperfusion syndrome (Haramaki et al. 1998Citation ).

When tissue concentrations of CoQ in experimental systems and humans are low, dietary administration of this lipid is often applied (Folkers 1990Citation ). Uptake into the blood is dependent on various factors such as the various oils in the mixture, other dietary constituents and the physical properties of CoQ administered. Administration of a derivatized lipid is often used to increase the uptake and transport efficiency. During the uptake of cholesterol, esterification with a fatty acid occurs in the intestinal wall; dolichol is esterified in a similar manner to make possible its intracellular transport to the lysosomes (Kahn et al. 1989Citation , Tollbom et al. 1988Citation ). {alpha}-Tocopherol used in supplementation is acetylated or succinylated, and these esterified forms of CoQ were applied in this study. Derivatization of CoQ improved the efficiency of uptake, and the blood levels were significantly increased with both derivatives, particularly the acetylated form. Because uptake into the liver and spleen takes place efficiently with the nonderivatized form, it is not expected that modification of the natural substance is required in this case. In our study and those preformed previously, there was no appreciable uptake of dietary CoQ by kidney, heart, muscle and brain tissues. These findings are at variance with those found in a recent study in which the brain concentration of CoQ was greater in rats after dietary supplementation (Matthews et al. 1998Citation ).

There are several possible explanations for the lack of uptake observed here, in addition to the most obvious cause, i.e., the absence of a transport mechanism for this specific substance. Uptake may be dependent on the dose and length of exposure employed. In our experiments, the CoQ supply exceeded that generally given to human subjects 20–30 times; therefore a further increase of the dietary content did not appear meaningful. The fact that the total CoQ concentration of both blood and liver was increased several-fold in our investigation proves that efficient uptake occurred when the transport mechanism was operative.

CoQ is a membrane constituent, and it is not obvious that dietary intake increases its concentration in membranes. The polyisoprenoid portions of CoQ, dolichol and dolichyl phosphate, are considered to be situated in the central hydrophobic portion of the membrane bilayer, which can house only a limited amount of these lipids (de Ropp and Troy 1985Citation , Valtersson et al. 1985Citation ). Accordingly, for uptake studies, membranes with a lipid deficiency could be more appropriate. One-year-old rats have lower CoQ concentrations in most tissues than younger rats. When these older rats were used in the uptake studies, the results were similar to those of the younger age group. Therefore, it is unlikely that the lack of uptake in some of the organs studied was due to the use of younger rats with a higher endogenous CoQ concentration. Because high uptake of CoQ was observed in both the liver and spleen, the idea that uptake requires deficiency is not supported. In the liver, exogenous CoQ was increased in both mitochondria and other membranes, but it remains to be established whether it was incorporated into the appropriate intramembraneous compartment. It is possible that the major proportion of the derivatized lipid was hydrolyzed during uptake into the blood, which may result in an inefficiency of transport into other tissues. However, because neither intraportal nor intraperitoneal administration gave better results than the peroral supplementation, this possibility appears to be unlikely.

Administration of particular compounds often down-regulates endogenous synthesis, which is very unfavorable. If the uptake of exogenous CoQ is paralleled by a decrease in the endogenous cellular CoQ, the dietary supplementation is not effective. In our experiments, no decrease of CoQ9 levels was found in the liver and spleen, in spite of the fact that CoQ10 levels were increased many-fold. This is a favorable observation, suggesting that the search for new ways to increase the CoQ concentration in various organs is not futile.

A large number of studies in the literature propose substantial functional improvement in organs upon CoQ administration, in spite of the limited uptake of this lipid. This limitation, however, does not exclude the possibility that CoQ modifies organ functions. Upon metabolism of CoQ, as well as after irradiation or concomitant lipid peroxidation, a number of intermediates and metabolites are produced that could have direct regulatory effects on the biosynthetic process (Forsmark-Andrée et al. 1997Citation , Morimoto et al. 1969Citation ). Alternatively, interaction with cell surface receptors can activate intracellular signaling mechanisms such as heterotrimeric G-proteins, which could explain the positive effects observed. Isolation and characterization of these metabolites are clearly important tasks for the future.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by the Swedish Cancer Society and the Swedish Medical Research Council. Back

3 The protein content was 18.7 g, the fat content 4 g and carbohydrates, 57 g/100 g. The vitamin mixture consisted (per 100 g) of retinol (1460 IU), cholecalciferol (150 IU), {alpha}-tocopherol (10 µg), thiamin (1.3 mg), riboflavin (1.2 mg), pyridoxine (1.4 mg), menadione (1.6 mg), B-12 (3.1 µg), folic acid (0.28 mg), nicotinic acid (7.8 mg), pantothenic acid (2.6 mg), choline (139 mg), inositol (171 mg) and biotin (36 µg). The major minerals were (per 100 g) calcium (0.74 mg), phosphorous (0.71 mg), sodium (0.22 mg), chlorine (0.45 mg), magnesium (0.18 mg) and potassium (0.70 mg). The trace minerals consisted of iron, copper, manganese, zinc, cobalt, iodine and selenium. Back

Manuscript received March 31, 1999. Initial review completed April 28, 1999. Revision accepted July 27, 1999.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

1. Åberg F., Appelkvist E.-L., Dallner G., Ernster L. Distribution and redox state of ubiquinones in rat and human tissues. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1992;295:230-234[Medline]

2. Alessandri M. G., Scalori V., Giovannini L., Mian M., Beretelli A. A. Plasma and tissue concentrations of coenzyme Q10 in the rat after intravenous administration by a microsphere delivery system or a new type of solution. Int. J. Tissue React. 1988;10:99-102[Medline]

3. Andrée P., Dallner G., Ernster L. Ubiquinol: an endogenous lipid-soluble antioxidant in animal tissues. Özben T. eds. Free Radicals, Oxidative Stress, and Antioxidants 1998:293-314 Plenum Press New York, NY.

4. Beyer R. E., Burnett B.-A., Cartwright K. J., Edington D. E., Falzon M. J., Kreitman K. R., Kuhn T. W., Ramp B. J., Rhee S.Y.S., Rosenwasser M. J., Stein M., Chin-I A. Tissue coenzyme Q (ubiquinone) and protein concentrations over the life span of the laboratory rat. Mech. Aging Dev. 1985;32:267-281

5. Beyer R. E., Noble W. M., Hirschfeld T. J. Coenzyme Q (ubiquinone) levels of tissues of rats during acclimation to cold. Can. J. Biochem. 1962;40:511-518[Medline]

6. Burton G. W., Ingold K. U., Foster D. O., Cheng S. C., Webb A., Hughes L., Lusztyk E. Comparison of free {alpha}-tocopherol and {alpha}-tocopheryl acetate as sources of vitamin E in rats and humans. Lipids 1988;23:834-840[Medline]

7. de Ropp J. S., Troy F. A. 2H NMR investigation of the organization and dynamics of polyisoprenoids in membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 1985;258:9122-9127[Abstract/Free Full Text]

8. Eggens I., Elmberger P. G., Löw P. The lipid composition of highly differentiated human hepatomas, with special reference to fatty acids. Br. J. Exp. Pathol. 1989;70:83-92[Medline]

9. Elmberger P. G., Kalén A., Brunk U., Dallner G. Discharge of newly synthesized dolichol, dolichyl phosphate and ubiquinone with lipoproteins to rat liver perfusate and to the bile. Lipids 1989;24:919-930[Medline]

10. Ericsson J., Scallen T. J., Chojnacki T., Dallner G. Involvement of sterol carrier protein-2 in dolichol biosynthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 1991;266:10602-10607[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Ericsson J., Thelin A., Chojnacki T., Dallner G. Isoprenoid biosynthesis in rat liver peroxisomes. Characterization of cis-prenyltransferase and squalene synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 1992;267:19730-19735[Abstract/Free Full Text]

12. Ernster L. Lipid peroxidation in biological membranes: mechanisms and implications. Yagi K. eds. Active Oxygens, Lipid Peroxides, and Antioxidants 1993:1-38 CRC Press Boca Raton, FL.

13. Ernster L., Dallner G. Biochemical, physiological and medical aspects of ubiquinone function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1995;1271:195-204[Medline]

14. Folkers K. Progress in biochemical approaches to clinical therapy with coenzyme Q10. Lenaz G. Barnabei O. Rabbi A. Battino M. eds. Highlights in Ubiquinone Research 1990:309-322 Taylor & Francis London, UK.

15. Forsmark-Andrée P., Lee C. P., Dallner G., Ernster L. Lipid peroxidation and changes in the ubiquinone content and the respiratory chain enzymes of submitochondrial particles. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1997;22:391-400[Medline]

16. Frei B., Kim M. C., Ames B. N. Ubiquinol-10 is an effective lipid-soluble antioxidant at physiological concentrations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1990;87:4879-4883[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Guan Z. Z., Söderberg M., Sindelar P., Prusiner S. B., Kristensson K., Dallner G. Lipid composition in scrapie-infected mouse brain. Prion infection increases the levels of dolichol-P and ubiquinone. J. Neurochem. 1996;66:277-285[Medline]

18. Haramaki N., Stewart D. B., Aggarwal S., Ikeda H., Reznick A. Z., Packer L. Networking antioxidants in the isolated rat heart are selectively depleted by ischemia-reperfusion. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1998;25:329-339[Medline]

19. Kahn B., Wilcox H. G., Heimberg M. Cholesterol is required for secretion of very-low-density lipoprotein by rat liver. Biochem. J. 1989;258:807-816[Medline]

20. Kalén A., Appelkvist E.-L., Dallner G. Age-related changes in the lipid compositions of rat and human tissues. Lipids 1989;24:579-584[Medline]

21. Karlsson J., Diamant B., Folkers K., Edlund P.-O., Lund B., Theorell H. Skeletal muscle and blood CoQ10 in health and disease. Lenaz G. Barnabei O. Rabbi A. Battino M. eds. Highlights in Ubiquinone Research 1990:288-292 Taylor & Francis London, UK.

22. Lönnrot K., Holm P., Lagerstedt A., Huhtala H., Alho H. The effects of lifelong ubiquinone Q10 supplementation on the Q9 and Q10 tissue concentrations and life span of male rats and mice. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Int. 1998;44:727-737[Medline]

23. Mataix J., Mañas M., Quies J., Battino M., Cassinello M., Lopez-Frias M., Huertas J. R. Coenzyme Q content depends upon oxidative stress and dietary fat unsaturation. Mol. Asp. Med. 1997;18:129-135

24. Matthews R., Yang L., Brown S., Baik M., Beal F. Coenzyme Q10 administration increases brain mitochondrial concentrations and exerts neuroprotective effects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998;95:8892-8897[Abstract/Free Full Text]

25. Mohr D., Stocker R. Radical-mediated oxidation of isolated human very-low-density lipoprotein. Arterioscler. Thromb. 1994;14:1186-1192[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Morimoto H., Imada I., Watanabe M., Nakao Y. Ubiquinones and related compounds. Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1969;729:158-170

27. Mortensen S. A. Perspectives on therapy of cardiovascular diseases with coenzyme Q10 (ubiquinone). Clin. Investig. 1993;71:116-123

28. Okamoto K., Matsumoto M., Watanabe M., Kawada M., Imamoto T., Imada I. Effects of 6-({omega}-substituted alkyl)-2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-1,4-benzoquinones and related compounds on mitochondrial and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide oxidase systems. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1985;33:3745-3755

29. Quinn P. J., Katsikas H. Thermal characteristics of coenzyme Q and its interaction with model membrane systems. Lenaz G. eds. Coenzyme Q 1985:107-130 John Wiley & Sons New York, NY.

30. Reahal S., Wrigglesworth J. Tissue concentration of coenzyme Q10 in the rat following its oral administration. Drug Metab. Dispos 1992;20:423-427[Abstract]

31. Söderberg M., Edlund C., Kristensson K., Dallner G. Lipid compositions in different regions of the human brain during aging. J. Neurochem. 1990;54:415-423[Medline]

32. Stocker R., Bowry V. W., Frei B. Ubiquinol-10 protects human low density lipoprotein more efficiently against lipid peroxidation than does alpha-tocopherol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1991;88:1646-1650[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Tollbom Ö, Valtersson C., Chojnacki T., Dallner G. Esterification of dolichol in rat liver. J. Biol. Chem. 1988;263:1347-1352[Abstract/Free Full Text]

34. Tribble D. L., van den Berg J. J., Motchnik P. A., Ames B. N., Lewis D. M., Chait A., Krauss R. M. Oxidative susceptibility of low density lipoprotein subfractions is related to their ubiquinol-10 and alpha-tocopherol content. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A. 1994;91:1183-1187[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Trumpower B. L. The protonmotive Q cycle. Energy transduction by coupling of proton translocation to electron transfer by the cytochrome bc1 complex. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265:11409-11412[Free Full Text]

36. Upston J. M., Neuzil J., Witting P. K., Alleva R., Stocker R. Oxidation of free fatty acids in low density lipoprotein by 15-lipoxygenase stimulates nonenzymic, alpha-tocopherol-mediated peroxidation of cholesteryl esters. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:30067-30074[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Valtersson C., van Duyn G., Verkleij A. J., Chojnacki T., de Kruiff B., Dallner G. The influence of dolichol, dolichol esters and dolichyl phosphate on phospholipid polymorphism and fluidity in model membranes. J. Biol. Chem. 1985;260:2742-2751[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Zhang Y., Åberg F., Appelkvist E.-L., Dallner G., Ernster L. Uptake of dietary coenzyme Q supplement is limited in rats. J. Nutr. 1995;125:446-453

39. Zhang Y., Turunen M., Appelkvist E.-L. Restricted uptake of dietary coenzyme Q is in contrast to the unrestricted uptake of {alpha}-tocopherol into rat organs and cells. J. Nutr. 1996;126:2089-2097




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Jonassen, P. L. Larsen, and C. F. Clarke
A dietary source of coenzyme Q is essential for growth of long-lived Caenorhabditis elegans clk-1 mutants
PNAS, December 28, 2000; (2000) 21337498.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
T. Jonassen, P. L. Larsen, and C. F. Clarke
A dietary source of coenzyme Q is essential for growth of long-lived Caenorhabditis elegans clk-1 mutants
PNAS, January 16, 2001; 98(2): 421 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turunen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dallner, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Turunen, M.
Right arrow Articles by Dallner, G.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1999 by American Society for Nutrition