![]() |
|
|
After reading a recent publication by Brodie et al. (1999)
in which our work was discussed (Houseknecht et al. 1998
), we consider it pertinent to clarify the applications
of methodologies used so that our data may be interpreted correctly.
Most importantly, the clarification of our approaches is important for
understanding our hypothesis.
First, with the transactivation assay, we were testing the
ability of conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) to induce PPAR
activation,
not transcription. Indeed, as can be read in the "Research design and
methods" section (Houseknecht et al. 1998
), we
transfected CV-1 cells with psG5-PPAR
full-length expression
vector. Doing so predicts that PPAR
is being transcribed and
translated in the cell system, thereby "preparing" this
transcription factor for activation (i.e., by CLA). Similar to other
steroid hormone receptors, PPAR
requires activation by a ligand in
order to modulate gene expression by interacting with a specific DNA
response element (known as PPRE) located upstream of a responsive gene.
In our transactivation assay, we cotransfected the cells with
pSV-GL2-PPRE-luciferase reporter plasmid and determined the ability of
various concentrations of CLA to activate PPAR
by measuring activity
of the "reporter," luciferase.
Second, we would like to clarify our hypothesis that was incorrectly
described by Brodie et al. (1999)
when it was stated:
"Using a transfection study, they demonstrate that CLA and
troglitazone can activate PPAR
transcription. They hypothesize from
these data that increased PPAR
is responsible for increased aP2
mRNA." This statement is completely wrong, as mentioned before, we
were not looking at increasing PPAR
mRNA in any part of our study.
Our hypothesis is that mRNA levels of aP2, a PPAR-responsive gene
(see above), were increased as a result of PPAR
activation (NOT
induction) by CLA.
Third, the authors incorrectly compared our data measuring aP2
mRNA and PPAR
-transactivation with work by Okuno et al. (1998)
who did not actually measure aP2 mRNA or PPAR
activation. In contrast to Brodie's implication that our data do not
agree with others, our findings are in close agreement with the dogma
that ligands and activators of PPAR
result in induction of
PPAR-responsive genes such as aP2, in vivo (Pearson et al. 1996
) and in vitro (Tonotonoz et al. 1994
).
REFERENCES
1.
Brodie A. E., Manning V. A., Ferguson K. R., Jewell D. E., Hu Y. Conjugated linoleic acid inhibits differentiation of pre- and post-confluent 3T3L1 preadipocytes but inhibits cell proliferation only in preconfluent cells. J. Nutr. 1999;129:602-606
2. Houseknecht K. L., Vanden Heuvel J. P., Moya-Camarena S. Y., Portocarrero C. P., Peck L. W., Nickel K. P., and Belury M. A. Dietary conjugated linoleic acid normalizes impaired glucose tolerance in the Zucker diabetic fatty fa/fa rat. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998;244:678-682[Medline]
3. Okuno A., Tamemoto H., Tobe K., Ueki K., Mori Y., Iwamoto K., Umesono K., Akanuma Y., Fujiwara T., Horikoshi H., Yazaki Y., and Kadowaki T. Troglitazone increases the number of small adipocytes without change of white adipose tissue mass in obese Zucker rats. J. Clin. Invest. 1998;101:1354-1361[Medline]
4.
Pearson S. L., Cawthorne M. A., Clapham J. C., Dunmore S. J., Holmes S. D., Moore G.B.T., Smith S. A., and Tadayyon M. Thiazolidinedione insulin sensitizer BRL 49653 increases the expression of PPAR-
and aP2 in adipose tissue of high-fat-fed rats. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 1996;229:752-757[Medline]
5.
Tonotonoz P., Hu E., Graves R. A., Budavari A. I., and Spiegelman B. M. mPPAR
2: Tissue-specific regulator of an adipocyte enhancer. Genes & Dev 1994;8:1224-1234
Oregon State University Department of Animal Sciences Corvallis, OR 97331-6702
Dear Dr. Suttie:
We thank Dr. Belury for clarifying their data. The point of their
investigation was to show that PPAR
is activated by CLA. We did
misstate their results to mean that CLA caused more PPAR mRNA. Our
confusion came from their discussion where both expression and
activation of PPAR were linked with expression of aP2. However, their
paper does say "We report that both CLA and TZD significantly
increased the steady state level of aP2 mRNA" (p. 681). Even with
their interpretation, the aP2 changes which they report do not agree
with our data. Therefore, these comments by Drs. Moya-Camarena and
Belury do not affect the conclusion of our paper.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||