![]() |
|
|
Department of Animal Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616
2To whom correspondence should be addressed.
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
KEY WORDS: carnivores gluconeogenesis amino acid catabolism owls chickens
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although an understanding of digestive adaptations and trade-offs
of avian carnivores is emerging, relatively little is known about their
intermediary metabolism. Presumably, carnivorous species have enhanced
capacity to use amino acids for energy and for gluconeogenesis relative
to omnivorous species. Habitually low levels of dietary carbohydrate
consumption and the consequent relaxed selection pressure on the
metabolic pathways for dietary glucose disposal might be predicted to
result in poor glucose homeostasis in response to a glucose challenge.
In fact, red-tailed hawks (Dobbs 1985
) and penguins
(Chieri et al. 1972
) take three to four times longer to
reestablish baseline glucose levels after an intravenous glucose
challenge than do chickens, but the enzymatic basis is not known.
Nonavian carnivores such as house cats (Kettelhut and Migliorini 1980
), rainbow trout (Palmer and Ryman 1972
),
white sturgeon (Hung 1991
) and American alligators
(Coulson and Hernandez 1983
) are also glucose intolerant
as indicated by prolonged glucose tolerance curves relative to
omnivorous species such as chickens, rats and humans. In alligators,
glucose intolerance is especially pronounced, and several days are
required for normal blood glucose levels to be obtained after an
intravenous glucose challenge. Rainbow trout are glucose intolerant due
in part to the lack of hepatic glucokinase
(GK;3
hexokinase type IV, EC 2.7.1.1), which is responsible for
phosphorylating glucose and facilitating its uptake into hepatocytes
(Palmer and Ryman 1972
). Cats also lack hepatic
glucokinase and are poor at down-regulating amino acid catabolism
and gluconeogenesis when fed low protein diets, indicating obligatory
gluconeogenesis. For example, feeding cats a 17.5% protein diet
resulted in little change in the activity of hepatic enzymes
phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK; EC 4.1.1.31), alanine
aminotransferase (ALT; EC 2.6.1.2), aspartate aminotransferase (AST: EC
2.6.1.1), and fructose-bisphosphatase (FBP: EC 3.1.3.11) compared
with cats fed a 70% protein diet (Rogers et al. 1977
).
Conversely, in the omnivorous rat (Eisenstein and Strack 1971
, Kettelhut and Migliorini 1980
,
Peret et al. 1981
) and Japanese quail
(Featherston and Freedland 1973
), PEPCK and amino acid
transaminases are very adaptable to changes in dietary protein or
glucose content.
Threonine is one of most gluconeogenic of the essential amino acids,
but it is relatively deficient in many plant proteins, causing
omnivores to alternate between periods of threonine insufficiency and
excess, depending upon the composition of their diets. When dietary
threonine is at or below the requirement of chickens, they use this
amino acid with high efficiency for protein accretion (Edwards et al. 1997
), but when it is in excess, it is available for use
as a gluconeogenic precursor. For carnivorous species, dietary
threonine would always be expected to be in excess of needs for protein
accretion; this excess is oxidized or used as a substrate for
gluconeogenesis. Lactate is also a good substrate for gluconeogenesis
in chickens (Tinker et al. 1986
) and the carnivorous
common murre (Herzberg et al. 1988
). The endogenous
production of lactate as a result of anaerobic glucose oxidation during
physical exertion makes this metabolite a common substrate in all
species regardless of their customary diet. Thus, threonine represents
a substrate whose surplus for oxidation or gluconeogenesis is highly
dependent upon customary diet, whereas the availability of lactate is
independent of diet.
The purpose of these studies was to compare glucose tolerance and dietary plasticity of hepatic glucosemetabolizing enzymes in barn owls (Tyto alba) and chickens fed either a low glucose, high protein diet or a high glucose, low protein diet. We also compared the use of threonine and lactate for oxidation and glucose formation in hepatocytes isolated from these two species.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Diet formulation.
A high protein, low glucose diet (HPLG) and a low protein, high glucose diet (LPHG) were made from ground chicken carcasses. Male broiler-type chickens (Ross x Hubbard; n = 8), obtained from Peninsula Hatchery (Santa Cruz, CA) were grown to 8 wk of age and then killed by cervical dislocation. Chickens were skinned and their intestines, gizzards, head, necks, abdominal fat depots and feet were removed. Half of the chicken carcasses were used as the basis of HPLG. The protein content of the remaining four carcasses was decreased by removal of the leg and breast muscle groups, forming the basis of LPHG. Both groups of carcasses were ground in a meat grinder (Hobart, Troy, OH) until the meat was homogeneously mixed and most of the bones were in small (<3 mm) pieces. Any larger bones were removed and discarded.
Samples from each mixture were analyzed for the following: moisture content by overnight drying in a drying oven at 65 oC; lipid content by ether extraction (Tecator Soxtec System HT 1043 Extractor, Pittsburgh, PA) of the dried tissue; and protein content of the defatted material by the Kjeldahl method (Tecator Auto 1030 Analyzer, Pittsburgh, PA). Proximate analysis information was used to formulate two isocaloric diets. This was accomplished by adding back abdominal fat pads to the LPHG diet in an amount equal to the fat removed with leg and breast muscles as determined by composition analysis. In addition, 300 g/kg D-glucose (Staley, Decatur, IL) was added on a dry weight basis to the LPHG diet. Proximate analysis indicated that the LPHG and HPLG diets had similar fat contents (283.2 and 304.1 g/kg dry matter, respectively), and a protein content of 334.4 and 553.5 g/kg dry matter, respectively. Calculated metabolizable energy values were 20.5 and 20.9 MJ/kg dry matter, respectively. To facilitate consumption, diets were placed into sausage casings with the use of a manually operated sausage-making machine. Diet-filled sausage casings were tied off with string to give pellets approximating the size of a small chick (2535 g).
Experimental animals.
Nonreleasable barn owls (n = 10) were obtained from various rehabilitation centers in central California, an area in which owls typically consume a diet made up exclusively of rodents and small birds. Barn owls (450 g average body weight) were allowed to acclimate to environmental rooms (50% humidity, 26°C, and 10 h dim light:14 h dark). The low light levels were necessary to prevent retinal injury. Owls were attached to ground perches by leather bracelets and a 3-ft leather leash and kept in groups of 23 per room. Owls were fed two 1-d old leghorn chicks/d. After the birds appeared comfortable with their new environment (3 d) they received two HPLG pellets each morning. Half of the birds readily ate the food pellets after several days. To accommodate those owls that did not readily accept the food pellets, pieces of skin and feathers from day-old leghorn chicks were attached to the surface of moistened pellets. One owl was unwilling to accept the modified food pellets and was not used in the study. The remaining nine owls were randomly assigned to either the HPLG diet or the LPHG diet. Owls switched to the LPHG diet were done so gradually over a 5-d period; on d 6, the owls received their experimental diets exclusively. After a further 6 d (d 11 after beginning the introduction of LPHG), three owls per dietary treatment were given an intravenous glucose tolerance test, and after 10 d (d 15 after beginning the introduction of LPHG), liver biopsies were taken for enzymatic analysis. The remaining three owls were used to determine oral glucose tolerance after receiving the HPLG diet as their exclusive food for 10 d.
Male Single Comb White Leghorn chicks (n = 30) obtained from Peninsula Hatchery were grown in battery brooders with raised wire floors. At 21 d, the chickens were moved to environmental chambers (50% humidity, 26 oC, and 10 h dim light:14 h dark). Chicks were fed a corn-soybean mealbased chicken starter (Purina, St. Louis, MO) ad libitum until 28 d of age and an average weight of 410 g. Chicks were randomly divided into two groups and assigned to either the HPLG diet or the LPHG diet. Because both experimental diets consisted primarily of meat, chicks were gradually introduced to each of the diets over a 5-d period. Thereafter, chicks were fed the experimental diets as the sole food source ad libitum. After a further 6 d of consuming experimental diets, three chicks per diet were used for intravenous glucose tolerance tests. After 10 d of consuming the experimental diets (d 15 since the beginning of their introduction), 10 chicks per diet were used for liver enzyme analysis and at 10 d, four chicks consuming the HPLG diet were used for an oral glucose tolerance test.
After 5 d of exclusive consumption of experimental diets, digesta samples, uncontaminated by urine, were sampled from the anterior-rectum using a syringe fitted with flexible tubing (5 mm diameter). The rectum of barn owls and chickens is relatively short (8 cm), facilitating easy access to the area of the ileocecal junction. Rectal digesta samples were taken from three owls and three chicks per diet 8 h after the morning feeding. This time period coincided with completion of consumption of the day's meal. The samples were extracted with 5 vol of water, centrifuged (10,000 x g for 10 min) and analyzed for glucose concentrations (kit 1620; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis MO).
Glucose challenge tests.
Chickens and barn owls were subjected to an intravenous glucose tolerance test 12 h after food removal. Blood was taken from the brachial vein of the bird to determine baseline glucose levels. Birds were then weighed and given an intravenous injection of 5 mL/kg body weight of 1.1 mol/L D-(+)-glucose (Sigma Chemical) in the opposite brachial vein over a period of 15 s. Approximately 100 µL of blood was collected at 10, 25, 60, 120, 210 and 360 min after glucose injection, placed in heparinized hematocrit tubes and stored on ice. Blood plasma was stored in a -20°C freezer before analysis of glucose concentrations.
Twelve hours before an oral glucose tolerance test, the HPLG diet was removed. Birds received a slurry of 22.2 mmol glucose/kg body weight in 10 mL of water by gavage. This amount of glucose was equivalent to the amount consumed in 40 g of LPHG, a typical morning meal for an owl. Blood samples were taken at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 180 and 240 min after gavage.
Liver sampling.
On the morning before surgery for liver biopsy, one food pellet was offered to each barn owl and the uneaten portion was removed after 8 h. Removal of food permitted emptying of the upper gastrointestinal tract so that the birds could be ventilated adequately during surgery. A liver biopsy was taken 16 h after food removal. Barn owls were anesthetized with isoflurane via an endotracheal tube. After laparotomy, a 1- to 2-g piece of the liver was removed and immediately frozen between two aluminum plates in liquid N2 and then stored at -20°C.
For chickens, feed was also removed 16 h before liver collection. Chicks were anesthetized with isoflurane gas; livers were removed from the body cavity, freeze-clamped in liquid N2 and stored at -20 °C. Immediately after liver removal, chickens were killed by cervical dislocation.
Liver enzyme activity.
Frozen liver samples were prepared for enzyme analysis by placing them
on dry ice and using a hammer to break them into pieces no larger than
67 mm across in a -20°C cold room. Liver samples were weighed into
test tubes and 9 parts of ice-cold 0.14 mol/L KCl was added for
ALT, AST, pyruvate kinase (PK; EC 2.7.1.40), malic enzyme (ME; EC
1.1.1.40) and FBP assays. For PEPCK assays, 9 parts of ice-cold
deionized water was added. Samples were homogenized on ice with a
Polytron (Brinkmann Instruments, Westbury, NY) twice at
half-maximum power for 15 s. Homogenates were centrifuged for
30 min at 14,000 x g in a 5 oC cold
room in an Eppendorf centrifuge (Brinkmann). For GK assay, 1 part liver
was added to 5 parts 0.15 mol/L KCl, 0.005 mol/L sodium EDTA and 5
mmol/L MgCl2, pH 7.0, then homogenized with a Teflon pestle
twice for 15 s. The homogenate was centrifuged (Sorvall RC 100,
DuPont Wilmington, DE) for 1 h at 105,000 x g
and 4°C and the supernatant was assayed for GK activity as described
by Dipietro and Weinhouse (1960)
. The assays for ALT and
AST were according to procedures described by Segal and Matsuzawa (1970)
. The assays for PEPCK and FBP were according
to procedures described by Opie and Newsholme (1967)
.
The assays for ME and PK were by the techniques described by
Ochoa (1955)
and Llorente et al. (1970)
,
respectively. Enzyme activity was measured in a multicell
thermostatically controlled spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan)
and was expressed as substrate consumed per minute per milligram of
protein. Protein was determined using a protein assay kit (#5656; Sigma
Chemical).
Hepatocyte culture.
Two orphaned and nonreleasable barn owl chicks and single comb white
leghorn chicks were fed day-old leghorn chicks and chicken starter,
respectively, to an age of ~6 wk. After exsanguination, the liver was
excised and rinsed in a petri-dish containing cold Hanks' balanced
salt solution (without Ca2+ or Mg2+) with
penicillin-streptomycin (105 U penicillin
and 100 mg streptomycin/L); hepatocytes were isolated by the procedure
described by Laurin and Cartwright (1993)
using type IV
collagenase (Sigma Chemical). Washed cells were resuspended in cold
Eagle's minimum essential media (#7399, Sigma Chemical) with 11.1
mmol/L glucose or in Eagle's with 19.4 mmol/L of glucose. Viability
was determined with 4 g/L trypan blue and was >95%. Final cell
concentrations were adjusted to 0.35 x 109 cells/L
for barn owls and 1.1 x 109 cells/L for chickens.
Differing cell concentrations were necessary to give similar cell
protein concentrations because of the cell size differential between
species. Aliquots of the final cell suspensions were taken for protein
determination (Protein Assay Kit 5656, Sigma Chemical).
Cell suspension (2 mL) was added to 25-mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 2 mL of one of the four treatment media designated as L/L, L/H, H/L and H/H [where the first letter signifies glucose concentration of 11.1 (L) or 19.4 (H) mmol/L and the second letter signifies threonine or lactate level of 2 mmol/L and 14.8 kBq (L) or 4 mmol/L and 29.6 kBq (H)]. Threonine and lactate were U-14C with a specific activity 4.85 and 3.1 TBq/mmol, respectively (ICN Biomedical, Costa Mesa, CA). The final specific activity of the substrate in the media was the same at both the high and low levels of substrate.
Treatments were replicated in four flasks per bird, giving a total of
eight observations per treatment for each species. Flasks with cells
and media were oxygenated with 95:5 O2/CO2 for
30 s and fitted with a septum stopper with a hanging center well
(Kontes Vineland, NJ), which contained a piece of fluted filter paper
for trapping CO2. Measurement of substrate oxidation to
CO2 and conversion to glucose was as described by
Beliveau and Freedland (1982)
. The amount of substrate
converted to CO2 and glucose was calculated from the
specific activity of label in the precursor and the products and were
expressed as µmol product formed/(g protein · h).
Statistical analysis.
Data were analyzed by ANOVA using the General Linear Models procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) for main effects and their interactions. Main effects for the intravenous glucose tolerance experiment were species, time and diet, and for the oral glucose tolerance experiment, they were species and time. Single degree of freedom contrasts were used to compare glucose values of chickens and barn owls at individual time points. Main effects for hepatic enzyme activities were species and diet. Main effects for the hepatocyte metabolism experiment were animal, species, glucose level and substrate level. Because the main effect for animal was not significant (P = 0.44), it was removed from the final model. Data are reported as means ± SEM and P < 0.05 indicated significant differences.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Glucose tolerance.
Initial (0 min) plasma glucose concentrations, taken 12 h after
food deprivation, were greater (P = 0.004) in chickens
fed HPLG than in those fed LPHG (Fig. 1
). In owls, initial plasma glucose concentrations were not significantly
different due to diet (P = 0.14). Initial glucose
concentrations for HPLG-fed birds were 14.87 and 14.14 mmol/L for
chickens and owls, respectively, and final concentrations for
HPLG-fed birds were 11.97 and 13.98 mmol/L. Initial glucose
concentrations for LPHG-fed birds were 11.58 and 12.54 mmol/L for
chickens and owls, respectively, and final concentrations were 10.32
and 13.04 mmol/L. The lack of significant time by diet interaction
(P > 0.5) indicates that, within a species, the shapes
of the glucose tolerance curves were not markedly affected by dietary
treatments.
|
Plasma glucose concentrations after an oral glucose challenge were also
very different between the two species (Fig. 2
). Maximal glucose concentration was greater (26.5 and 17.6 mmol/L,
respectively) and occurred later (90 and 30 min, respectively) in barn
owls than in chickens. At 240 min, the plasma glucose concentration of
barn owls were still significantly higher than initial levels
(P = 0.002), whereas levels in chickens had returned to
initial levels between 120 and 180 min.
|
Hepatic ALT activity averaged 27.6% higher in HPLG-fed chickens
and barn owls compared with LPHG-fed birds (Table 1
). Owls and chickens fed the LPHG diet had significantly higher
activities of ME compared with HPLG-fed birds, but the extent of
this difference was species dependent (significant species by diet
interaction). Owls exhibited only 25% greater ME activity when fed
LPHG compared with HPLG, whereas chicken ME activity was 106% greater
when LPHG was fed. There was a trend for a diet by species interaction
for PEPCK (P = 0.08), with HPLG, resulting in a 14.9%
greater activity than with LPHG in chickens, but little difference in
barn owls.
|
Hepatocyte metabolism.
Owls oxidized more than three times as much lactate to carbon dioxide
than did chickens (Table 2
). Glucose level also significantly affected the rate of lactate
oxidation, with 39% lower rates at the high glucose concentrations
than at the low concentration. High levels of lactate (4 mmol/L) caused
a 50% greater rate of lactate oxidation compared with low levels of
lactate (2 mmol/L). However, owls and chickens did not adjust to the
level of lactate in a similar manner, as evidenced by a significant
species by substrate interaction. In barn owls, lactate was oxidized
53% faster at the high lactate level compared with the low level,
whereas chickens oxidized lactate only 37% faster, when averaged
across glucose levels.
|
Chickens oxidized 61% more threonine to carbon dioxide than did barn owls. Across both species, the rate of threonine oxidation at high glucose levels was 77% lower than at low glucose levels. However, chickens and barn owls responded differently to changes in glucose levels (P = 0.003 for species by glucose interaction), with chickens decreasing threonine oxidation due to high media glucose to a greater extent (89%) than barn owls (54%). A significant interaction also indicates that threonine oxidation in chickens and barn owls responded differently to threonine level. Owl hepatocytes experienced a 136% increase in oxidation with increased substrate, whereas chicken hepatocytes had a 65% decrease. There was also a glucose by substrate interaction (P = 0.013); at the low glucose level, the high level of threonine resulted in 24% higher oxidation than the lower level of threonine, but at the high glucose level, the difference was 98%.
Owl hepatocytes converted 87% more threonine to glucose than did chicken hepatocytes. Glucose level also had a significant effect on the rate of gluconeogenesis. Averaged across species, hepatocytes incubated in the low level of glucose had 335% greater rates of gluconeogenesis from threonine than hepatocytes incubated in the high level of glucose. Hepatocytes from barn owls and chickens responded differently to media glucose concentration. In barn owl hepatocytes incubated in a low concentration of glucose, the rate of gluconeogenesis from threonine was 310% higher than those incubated in a high glucose concentration. For the same comparison in chicken hepatocytes, gluconeogenesis increased 505%. Averaged across species and glucose levels, increasing threonine concentration from 2 to 4 mmol/L increased the rate of gluconeogenesis from threonine by 48%. The level of substrate influenced the two species differently (P = 0.0002 for the species by substrate interaction). In barn owl hepatocytes, high media threonine resulted in a 109% greater rate of gluconeogenesis from threonine compared with low media threonine, but in chicken hepatocytes, gluconeogenesis was 17% lower at the high media concentration.
Partitioning ratios (substrate oxidized/substrate converted to glucose)
in hepatocytes from barn owls and chickens are shown in Figure 3
. When averaged across glucose levels and lactate concentrations,
hepatocytes from both species oxidized more lactate than they utilized
for gluconeogenesis. Chicken hepatocytes partitioned considerably more
lactate toward gluconeogenesis (ratio of 2.26) compared with barn owl
hepatocytes (ratio of 10.15). High levels of glucose shifted the
partitioning of lactate toward oxidation in chicken hepatocytes but
toward gluconeogenesis in barn owl hepatocytes.
|
The sum of lactate and threonine (lactate + threonine) that was
oxidized or used for gluconeogenesis was lower at high glucose
concentrations than at low concentrations (Table 2)
. However, a
significant glucose by species interaction indicated that barn owls
were less sensitive to media glucose concentration; there was 32% less
oxidation of lactate + threonine in low glucose relative to high
glucose for barn owls, but 85% less in chickens. A similar pattern was
observed for the rate of gluconeogenesis from lactate + threonine, with
the decrease due to higher glucose levels of 62% in barn owls and 83%
in chickens. Thus, compared with chickens, barn owls were less capable
of decreasing substrate (lactate + threonine) oxidation and use for
gluconeogenesis with increasing glucose.
A significant substrate by species interaction indicates that the effect of substrate concentration on the rate of lactate + threonine oxidation was also species dependent. In the barn owl, increasing the concentration of substrate increased the rate by 78%, but in the chicken, there was a decrease of 50%. Similarly, the use of lactate + threonine for gluconeogenesis was 98% greater in the barn owl at high relative to low substrate concentrations, but was 13% lower in the chicken. Thus, the use of lactate + threonine for either oxidation or gluconeogenesis by barn owl hepatocytes was more sensitive to additional media threonine and lactate than were chicken hepatocytes.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chickens and barn owls had large differences in the shapes of their
glucose tolerance curves after either an oral or intravenous glucose
challenge as demonstrated by a difference in the height of the glucose
peak or the duration required to return to baseline glucose levels.
These findings are similar to those seen by Dobbs (1985)
comparing chickens and red-tailed hawks. The 6.3-fold difference
that we observed in hepatic glucokinase activity may be one possible
explanation for these large differences in rates of glucose clearance.
Rainbow trout are similarly glucose intolerant and have low activities
of glucokinase activity; yet their ability to clear a glucose load is
greatly improved by the administration of insulin (Palmer and Ryman 1972
). The relatively low levels of glucokinase and
pyruvate kinase were not induced by feeding barn owls a high glucose
diet for 1 wk, as would be expected if hormonal adaptation were to
occur. Insulin concentrations in the avian carnivores, penguins,
eagles, kestrels and red-tailed hawks, are very low relative to
chickens (Basabe et al. 1975
, Minick and Duke 1991
, Minick et al. 1996
). However, in kestrels,
insulin is more responsive to glucose than in chickens (Minick 1993
). The fact that we saw considerable glycosuria when
glucose was fed in a diet containing 33% protein, which is a known
secretagogue for insulin in red-tailed hawks (Minick et al. 1996
) and chickens, further suggests that insulin responses are
not the only critical factor influencing our results.
The high rate of gluconeogenesis and poor capacity to down-regulate this process may partially explain the sustained high levels of glucose in the barn owl. Relative to chicken hepatocytes, those of the barn owl were less capable of down-regulating gluconeogenesis from lactate or threonine when media glucose concentrations were high. Thus, sustained production of glucose by the liver even during a glucose challenge may contribute to the slow fall of glucose levels.
Given that barn owls normally consume a diet that is mainly devoid of
glucose, it is not surprising that they possess over threefold higher
levels of PEPCK relative to chickens. Migliorini et al. (1973)
found a similar difference (fourfold) in hepatic PEPCK
activity between fed chickens and black vultures. Furthermore, PEPCK in
black vultures consuming animal carcasses is near maximally induced and
does not further increase in activity during fasting (Veiga et al. 1978
). The normal high rate of gluconeogenesis in black
vultures is associated with resistance to a fall in plasma glucose
concentrations during starvation (Migliorini et al. 1973
). The barn owls in our experiment were also resistant to
hypoglycemia after a 12-h period of feed withdrawal. In chickens,
fasting plasma glucose was higher in those fed HPLG than in those fed
LPHG. Apparently, chickens previously fed HPLG and barn owls on either
diet had less of a decline in glucose levels due to the 12-h food
deprivation because they were already in a highly gluconeogenic state.
Rats and chickens fed a high glucose diet and then deprived of food
exhibit a lag time of a few days to reestablish previous glucose
baseline levels as they shift from a mostly glycolytic state to a
gluconeogenic one (Eisenstein and Strack 1971
,
Hazelwood and Lorenz 1959
). As with other raptors, barn
owls commonly face periods of starvation and need to catabolize large
amounts of endogenous protein to sustain plasma glucose levels. The
barn owl is particularly sensitive to starvation in that it is unable
to decrease its existence energy requirements and it loses lean body
mass rapidly (Handrich et al. 1993
). The high rate of
gluconeogenesis in barn owls in the fed state continues to protect
plasma glucose levels during starvation.
It is possible that the large difference in hepatic PEPCK activity
between chickens and owls represents a difference in the tissue
distribution of the gluconeogenic pathway between these two species. In
chickens, the kidney accounts for as much as 30% of the gluconeogenic
capacity (Watford 1989
). The kidneys of owls are
considerably smaller than those of chickens (Johnson 1968
), and the liver might be relied on more for this pathway.
Additionally, the cytosolic form of PEPCK found in the kidney of
chickens is considerably more responsive to dietary manipulations than
the mitochondrial form found in the liver (Watford 1989
). We found a lack of regulation of hepatic PEPCK by diet
in owls as well as chickens but our tissue preparation technique
precluded the independent measurement of cytosolic and mitochondrial
forms. Clearly, an understanding of the contribution of PEPCK to the
glucose intolerance in barn owls will require measurement of the
cytosolic form in the liver and kidney.
In vitro experiments with cultured hepatocytes revealed that barn owls oxidized 214% more lactate to carbon dioxide than did chickens. However, chickens oxidized 61% more threonine than barn owls. Owl hepatocytes might be predisposed to oxidizing less threonine than those of chickens because their customary diet requires them to rely more heavily on amino acids such as threonine for gluconeogenesis. Increasing glucose in the media decreased the catabolism of both substrates, and this sparing was considerably more pronounced in chickens than in barn owls. In this study, the low glucose level chosen was 11.1 mmol/L, which was slightly below the fasting level of chickens and barn owls. The high level of 19.4 mmol/L is similar to the maximum seen in chickens after an oral glucose challenge.
Chickens made 43% more glucose from lactate than did barn owls and, conversely, barn owls made 87% more glucose from threonine than did chickens. Owls preferred to use threonine as a gluconeogenic precursor relative to lactate, presumably because they evolved with large excesses of amino acids arriving from their normal diet, whereas the omnivorous chicken does not normally have large excesses of dietary threonine. Gluconeogenesis from lactate was greatly suppressed by high levels of glucose in chickens but not in barn owls. When threonine was the substrate, gluconeogenesis was suppressed by high media glucose in both species but to a greater relative extent in chickens. When threonine concentrations were increased in the media, barn owls increased its use for gluconeogenesis, whereas chickens increased its oxidation. This provides further evidence of the efficiency and preference of barn owls for using amino acids for gluconeogenesis. When both substrates are considered together (threonine + lactate), barn owls and chickens metabolize similar amounts to CO2 and glucose, but barn owls were less capable of decreasing oxidation and gluconeogenesis in the presence of high levels of glucose.
Hepatocyte glucose production from lactate or threonine was markedly decreased by high media glucose concentrations, but in our feeding trial, PEPCK activity was not affected by high levels of glucose. This would suggest that either PEPCK is not the primary regulatory enzyme for this pathway or that regulation occurs at a step by-passed in our assay system.
In both species, ME activity was significantly lower in birds fed the
HPLG diet. Malic enzyme and lipogenesis have been shown to increase
with increasing glucose or carbohydrate in the diet and decrease with
increasing protein or fat (Featherston and Freedland 1973
, Rosebrough et al. 1990
; Yeh and Leveille 1969
). Averaged across diets, ME activity in the liver
of barn owls was only 35% of that in chickens. It is conceivable that
the low ME activity of barn owls results from low selection pressure on
this enzyme due to the high fat content of animal prey in their
customary diet. This same reasoning may help to explain why ME activity
was less affected by diet in barn owls relative to chickens. In barn
owls fed the HPLG diet, ME was low, and it was only 26% higher in
those that consumed the LPHG diet. Hepatic ME activity in chickens was
103% higher in those fed the LPHG diet compared with those fed the
HPLG diet. Thus, barn owls have a low capacity to synthesize fatty
acids and are less capable of augmenting this pathway when presented
with additional dietary glucose.
By feeding diets differing widely in glucose and protein content and by manipulating glucose and gluconeogenic precursors in the media of cultured hepatocytes, we determined that the flexibility of glucose metabolism of barn owls is less than that of chickens. Barn owls, like other carnivores, have greatly diminished liver glucokinase and malic enzyme activity compared with omnivores, presumably due to a lack of selection pressure for retaining these habitually idle pathways. Conversely, the high activity PEPCK and preferential use of threonine for gluconeogenesis facilitate the consumption of a high protein, low glucose diet.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
3 Abbreviations used: ALT, alanine
aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; FBP,
fructose-bisphosphatase; GK, glucokinase; HPLG, high protein, low
glucose diet; LPHG, low protein, high glucose diet; ME, malic enzyme;
PEPCK, phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase; PK, pyruvate kinase. ![]()
Manuscript received March 26, 1999. Initial review completed May 6, 1999. Revision accepted July 27, 1999.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1. Barton N.W.H., Houston D. C. A comparison of digestive efficiency in birds of prey. Ibis 1993;135:363-371
2. Basabe J. C., Farina J. M., Chieri R. A. In vitro insulin secretion from the penguin (Pygoscelis papua) pancreas. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 1975;27:43-51[Medline]
3. Beliveau G. P., Freedland R. A. Metabolism of serine, glycine and threonine in isolated cat hepatocytes Felis domestica. Comp. Biochem. Physiol B Comp. Biochem. 1982;71:13-18[Medline]
4. Chieri R. A., Basabe J. C., Farina M. S., Foglia V. G. Studies on carbohydrate metabolism in penguins (Pygocellis papua). Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 1972;18:1-4[Medline]
5. Coulson R. A., Hernandez T. Alligator Metabolism. Studies on Chemical Reactions In Vivo 1983 Pergamon Press Oxford, UK.
6.
Diamond J. M. Evolutionary design of intestinal nutrient absorption: enough but not too much. News Physiol. Sci. 1991;6:92-96
7.
Dipietro D. L., Weinhouse S. Hepatic glucokinase in the fed, fasted, and alloxan-diabetic rat. J. Biol. Chem. 1960;235:2542-2545
8. Dobbs J. C. Avian Carnivore: Food Recognition, Nutrient Intakes, and Utilization of Nitrogen 1985 Doctoral thesis University of California-Davis, Davis, CA.
9. Duke G. E. Gastrointestinal physiology and nutrition in wild birds. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 1997;56:1049-1056[Medline]
10. Duke G. E., Evanson O. A., Redig P. T., Rhoades D. D. Mechanism of pellet egestion in great horned owls (Bubo Virginianus). Am. J. Physiol. 1976;213:1824-1828
11. Edwards H. M., III, Baker D. H., Fernandez S. R., Parsons C. M. Maintenance threonine requirement and efficiency of its use for accretion of whole-body threonine and protein in young chicks. Br. J. Nutr. 1997;78:111-119[Medline]
12. Eisenstein A. B., Strack I. Effect of high protein feeding on gluconeogenesis in rat liver. Diabetes 1971;20:577-585[Medline]
13. Featherston W. R., Freedland R. A. Influence of dietary protein and carbohydrate levels on liver enzyme activities in quail. J. Nutr. 1973;103:625-634
14. Handrich Y., Nicolas L., Le Maho Y. Winter starvation in captive common barn-owls: physiological states and reversible limits. Auk 1993;110:458-469
15. Hazelwood R. L., Lorenz F. W. Effects of fasting and insulin on carbohydrate metabolism in the domestic fowl. Am. J. Physiol. 1959;:47-55
16.
Herzberg G. R., Brosnan J. T., Hall B., Rogerson M. Gluconeogenesis in liver and kidney of common murre (Uria aalge). Am. J. Physiol. 1988;254:R903-R907
17. Hung S. S. Carbohydrate utilization by white sturgeon as assessed by oral administration tests. J. Nutr. 1991;121:1600-1605
18. Johnson O. W. Some morphological features of avian kidneys. Auk 1968;85:216-222
19. Karasov W. H., Diamond J. M. A simple method for measuring intestinal solute uptake in vitro. Comp. Physiol. 1982;152B:105-116
20. Karasov W. H., Levey D. J. Digestive system trade-offs and adaptations of frugivorous passerine birds. Physiol. Zool. 1990;63:1248-1270
21. Kettelhut I.C.F., Migliorini R. H. Glucose homeostasis in a carnivorous animal (cat) and in rats fed a high protein diet. Am. J. Physiol. 1980;239:R437-R444
22. Kirkwood J. K. The partitioning of food energy for existence in the kestrel (Falco tinnunculus) and the barn owl (Tyto alba). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1979;63A:495-498
23. Klandorf H. Glucose tolerance and pancreatic hormones in thyroidectomized and thyroid hormone-injected cockerels. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 1988;69:226-232[Medline]
24. Klasing K. C. Comparative Avian Nutrition 1998 CAB International Wallingford, UK.
25. Laurin D. E., Cartwright A. L. Factors affecting insulin responsiveness of triglyceride synthesis in incubated chicken hepatocytes. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1993;202:476-481[Abstract]
26. Llorente P., Marco R., Sols A. Regulation of liver pyruvate kinase and the phosphoenolpyruvate crossroads. Eur. J. Biochem. 1970;13:45-54[Medline]
27. Martin A. M., Zim H. S., Nelson A. L. American Wildlife and Plants 1951 McGraw-Hill Book Company New York, NY.
28.
Migliorini R. H., Linder C., Moura J. L., Veiga J. A. Gluconeogenesis in a carnivorous bird (black vulture). Am. J. Physiol. 1973;225:1389-1392
29. Minick M. C. Endocrine pancreatic control of blood glucose homeostasis in raptors. Trends Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1993;1:483-499
30. Minick M. C., Duke G. E. Simultaneous determinations of plasma insulin, glucose and glucagon levels in fasting, previously stressed but convalescing bald eagles. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1991;99A:307-311
31. Minick M. C., Duke G. E., Fishman S. W., Harvey R. B. Effects of intragastric nutrients upon simultaneously determined plasma insulin, glucagon, insulin-glucagon ratios and glucose in red-tailed hawks, Buteo jamaicensis gmelin. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 1996;113:173-179
32. Ochoa S. Malic enzyme. Methods Enzymol 1955;1:739-743
33. Opie L. H., Newsholme E. A. The activities of fructose 1,6-diphosphatase, phosphofructokinase, and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase in white and red muscle. Biochem. J. 1967;103:391-398[Medline]
34. Palmer T. N., Ryman B. E. Studies on oral glucose tolerance in fish. J. Fish Biol. 1972;4:311-319
35. Peret J., Foustock S., Chanez M., Bois-Joyeux B., Assan R. Plasma glucagon and insulin concentrations and hepatic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase and pyruvate kinase activities during and upon adaptation of rats to a high protein diet. J. Nutr. 1981;111:1173-1184
36. Rogers Q. R., Morris J. G., Freedland R. A. Lack of hepatic enzymatic adaptation to low and high levels of dietary protein in the adult cat. Enzyme 1977;22:348-356[Medline]
37. Rosebrough R. W., Mitchell A. D., Von Vleck M. F., Steele N. C. Protein and energy relations in the broiler chicken. 8. Comparison involving protein- and lysine-adequate and inadequate diets on lipid metabolism. Br. J. Nutr. 1990;64:515-523[Medline]
38. Segal H. L., Matsuzawa T. L-Alanine aminotransferase (rat liver). Methods Enzymol 1970;17A:153-159
39. Tabaka C. S., Ullrey D. E., Sikarskie J. G., Debar S. R., Ku P. K. Diet, cast composition, and energy and nutrient intake of red-tailed hawks (Buteo jamaicensis), great horned owls (Bubo virginianus), and turkey vultures (Cathartes aura). J. Zoo. Wildl. Med. 1996;27:187-196
40. Tinker D. A., Brosnan J. T., Herzberg G. R. Interorgan metabolism of amino acids, glucose, lactate, glycerol and uric acid in the domestic fowl (Gallus domesticus). Biochem. J. 1986;240:829-836[Medline]
41. Veiga J. A., Roselino E. S., Migliorini R. H. Fasting, adrenalectomy, and gluconeogenesis in the chicken and a carnivorous bird. Am. J. Physiol. 1978;234:R115-R121[Medline]
42. Watford M. Hormonal and nutritional regulation of phsophoenolpyruvate carboxykinase mRNA levels in chicken kidney. J. Nutr. 1989;119:319-322
43. Yeh Y. Y., Leveille G. A. Effect of dietary protein on hepatic lipogenesis in the growing chick. J. Nutr. 1969;98:356-366
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. S. Green, J. J. Ramsey, C. Villaverde, D. K. Asami, A. Wei, and A. J. Fascetti Cats Are Able to Adapt Protein Oxidation to Protein Intake Provided Their Requirement for Dietary Protein Is Met J. Nutr., June 1, 2008; 138(6): 1053 - 1060. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. R. Rogers and J. G. Morris Up-Regulation of Nitrogen Catabolic Enzymes Is Not Required to Readily Oxidize Excess Protein in Cats J. Nutr., September 1, 2002; 132(9): 2819 - 2820. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. A. Koutsos, J. Smith, L. W. Woods, and K. C. Klasing Adult Cockatiels (Nymphicus hollandicus) Metabolically Adapt to High Protein Diets J. Nutr., July 1, 2001; 131(7): 2014 - 2020. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S Panserat, E Plagnes-Juan, J Breque, and S Kaushik Hepatic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene expression is not repressed by dietary carbohydrates in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) J. Exp. Biol., January 1, 2001; 204(2): 359 - 365. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||