Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A.
(Journal of Nutrition. 1999;129:1765-1768.)
© 1999 The American Society for Nutritional Sciences


Article

Recent Advances from Application of Doubly Labeled Water to Measurement of Human Energy Expenditure1 ,,2

Dale A. Schoeller

Department of Nutritional Sciences, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Assessment of Energy...
 Assessment of Energy...
 Obesity Research.
 Validating Measurement of Energy...
 REFERENCES
 
The doubly labeled water (DLW) method was developed 50 years ago, but nearly 40 years passed before it became a major tool for human nutrition research. Its use has grown dramatically, however, since the first human applications. The DLW method is now the preferred method for determining energy requirements of healthy and clinical populations. The method has been applied extensively to the study of the growing problem of obesity in order to determine the role of energy expenditure and physical activity in weight control. Finally, DLW has provided a new means of validating methods for assessing dietary intake. The accuracy and noninvasive nature of the DLW method makes it ideal for the study of human energy metabolism.


KEY WORDS: • energy • metabolism • calorimetry • requirements • isotope


    INTRODUCTION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Assessment of Energy...
 Assessment of Energy...
 Obesity Research.
 Validating Measurement of Energy...
 REFERENCES
 
In 1985, the FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Committee on Energy Requirements (1985)Citation recommended that energy requirements be based on assessments of energy expenditure rather than energy intake. The assessment of energy expenditure, however, was a daunting task because of the difficulty associated with the measurement of physical activity (PA),3 the most variable component of total daily energy expenditure (TEE). Earlier, we documented the first application of a stable isotope technique that had the potential for accurate, objective measurement of TEE in free-living individuals (Schoeller and van Santen 1982Citation ). This technique is the doubly labeled water method (DLW), which was developed by Nathan Lifson in the early 1950s (Lifson and McClintock 1966Citation ). The doubly labeled water method, in essence, turns the body into its own metabolic recorder. After a loading of water labeled with deuterium and 18O, the deuterium washes out of the body as water and the 18O washes out of the body as water and carbon dioxide. Under steady-state conditions, single-compartment kinetics, the difference between the two elimination rates is a measure of carbon dioxide output. Energy expenditure is then calculated from carbon dioxide production using standard equations for indirect calorimetry (Fig. 1Citation ). The advantage of the method is that it is not necessary to collect the expired carbon dioxide, but simply collect periodic urine specimens to determine the amount of stable isotope left in the body. Subjects are, therefore, free to live at home and engage in normal activities of daily life.



View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. After a loading dose of 2H218O, 5–20% of the tracers are lost from the body each day. The product of total body water (TBW) and the deuterium elimination rate (kH) is a measure of the rate of water output (rH2O). The product of TBW and the oxygen elimination rate (kO) is a measure of the sum of water output and two times carbon dioxide output (rCO2). Taking the difference between these two equations and rearranging terms yields the equations for calculation of rCO2. Small corrections are required for differences in isotope dilution spaces and isotope fractionation.

 
During the 10 years after its initial use in humans, the DLW method was subjected to extensive validation (Schoeller 1988Citation ) as well as a lively debate over the number of specimens and exact assumptions to be used in the model (Coward and Prentice 1985Citation , Schoeller 1984Citation ). These discussions have been largely resolved (Coward et al. 1994Citation , Roberts et al. 1995Citation ). The method is now considered the gold standard for the measurement of TEE and it has become a common tool. The method is also used widely in comparative biology, but that is beyond the scope of this review.

In recent years, DLW research has grown dramatically. Some of this growth results from advances in isotope ratio instrumentation (Coplen and Harper 1994Citation , Schoeller and Luke 1997Citation ). These improvements have made it possible to apply the DLW to studies involving hundreds of participants rather than the 5- to 20-participant studies that characterized earlier applications. The DLW method, however, is still very sensitive to the precision of the isotopic analyses (Speakman 1995Citation ). The number of participants in a given study is not a guarantee that the method is or is not sufficiently powered for correlation analysis because precision of the method varies among laboratories (Roberts et al. 1995Citation , Schoeller et al. 1995Citation ).

The application of the DLW method has expanded human nutrition knowledge. Most of the recent advances can be placed in one of three categories as follows: the assessment of energy requirements in health and disease, the study of the etiology of obesity, and the validation of tools for the assessment of dietary intake, an application that takes the FAO/WHO/UNU recommendation to its extreme.


    Assessment of Energy Requirements.
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Assessment of Energy...
 Assessment of Energy...
 Obesity Research.
 Validating Measurement of Energy...
 REFERENCES
 
Black et al. (1996)Citation compiled results from 574 DLW studies that had been published over the previous 12 years. These represented only a third of the DLW measurements that had been published at the time because selection criteria excluded data that did not include a resting metabolic rate under near basal conditions, data from developing countries and data that did not represent "normal" free-living conditions. These data indicated that the recommended energy intakes for the United States (NRA 1989Citation ) for infants and children were high, whereas those for adolescents and adults were usually low. In the three years since the compilation was published, the data available in the literature have tripled. Care should be exercised in reviewing these data, however, because many of the DLW results are included in more than one data analysis. Among the recent publications are four that are notable for their size. Davis (1998)Citation recently reviewed the growing body of data on energy requirements in infants (n > 400) and reported that current recommendations for energy intake in y 1 of life remain ~10% higher than indicated by DLW measured expenditure plus estimated increase in body energy stores. A study 8- to 12-y-old girls (n = 109) by Bandini et al. (1997)Citation suggests that TEE is 100–200 kcal/d greater than the earlier estimate of Black et al. (1996)Citation , whereas a study of 46 adolescents (Bratteby et al. 1998Citation ) supports the values accumulated by Black et al. (1996)Citation , but indicates that the gender difference may be smaller than that first estimated. Finally, in the elderly, Carpenter et al. (1998)Citation published a study of 164 subjects with an average age between 65 and 70 y. The data support those of Black et al. (1996)Citation for men, but the study found that women expend ~2000 kcal/d, which halves the gender difference suggested by Black's data for this age group.

The DLW has also been applied to the measurement of energy requirements of healthy individuals under some very abnormal and fascinating conditions. Branth et al. (1996)Citation determined the energy requirements of six men from an 11-man sailing crew during an around the world, off-shore race and found that TEE averaged 4700 kcal/d. Pulfrey and Jones (1996)Citation measured the TEE of six mountain climbers during an ascent above 6000 m and reported TEE equaled 4700 kcal/d. Taking altitude to the extreme, Lane et al. (1997)Citation and Stein et al. (1999)Citation reported that energy expenditure during short-term space flight is similar to expenditure on earth, despite the absence of the need to work against the forces of gravity. The growing database regarding energy requirements for military training and operations included two new entries. Mudambo et al. (1997)Citation studied eight Zimbabwean solders during field exercises in extreme heat and reported TEE of 5600 kcal/d, whereas Burstein et al. (1996)Citation reported lower expenditures of 4300 and 3900 kcal/d for field operations of military during extreme cold and heat, respectively.

Under more typical conditions, investigators have studied the plasticity of expenditure under conditions of added training or forced inactivity. Blanc et al. (1998)Citation measured the response to forced bed-rest and found a 20% reduction in TEE compared with free-living conditions. Eliakim et al. (1998)Citation measured TEE at the end of 5 wk of physical activity training in male adolescents and found that TEE was 15% greater than that of nontraining controls. Van Etten et al. (1997)Citation reported a 9% increase in TEE in 18 men enrolled in a resistance training program. In that study, all of the increase was attributed to nonresting expenditure and 40% of the increase was due to the training sessions themselves. Only Treuth et al. (1998)Citation reported that a weight training program in 7- to 10-y-old girls resulted in no increase in TEE despite a 19% increase in strength. Thus most studies continue to find that programmed changes in physical activity do alter TEE in the expected direction (Westerterp 1998Citation ).

An area of study that is still significantly limited is that of energy requirements in developing countries (Coward 1998Citation ). Only two recent papers have appeared. Jiang et al. (1998)Citation studied 41 infants at 4 and 6 mo of age. They reported TEE values that are not different from those in developed countries, but do find evidence of a decline in growth rate at 6 mo, suggesting that energy intake at the time of weaning may be less than optimal. Wren et al. (1997)Citation compared the expenditures of small-for-age children in Guatemala with those who were normal weight-for-age and a second control group of normal weight-for-age children in the United States. Although TEE was decreased in the small weight-for-age children, it was not reduced after adjusting for fat-free mass, indicating that factors leading to the growth stunting did not alter cellular determinant of energy expenditure.


    Assessment of Energy Requirements of Clinical Populations.
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Assessment of Energy...
 Assessment of Energy...
 Obesity Research.
 Validating Measurement of Energy...
 REFERENCES
 
The DLW method provides a unique tool for assessing energy requirements for clinical populations, many of which suffer weight loss or failure to thrive. Infants with cyanotic congenital heart disease or broncopulmonary disease fail to grow at reference rates. Leitch et al. (1998)Citation and de Meer et al. (1997)Citation , used the DLW method to document increases in TEE of 30 and 15%, respectively, in 1- to 2-mo-old infants. These increase the risk of undernutrition and require that special attention be paid to maintaining energy intake.

Among adults, however, a different relationship is being noted. Chronic diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure have often been classified as hypermetabolic diseases because of increases in resting metabolic rate (RMR). DLW measurements, however, have demonstrated that TEE either is not different from controls or is less due to decreases in physical activity (Baarends et al. 1997Citation , McCallan et al. 1995Citation ). Thus, losses of weight or muscle mass in these individuals is not ususally caused by increased energy needs, and greater attention should be focused on maintaining normal levels of dietary intake. Investigators interested in determining energy requirements of clinical populations are finding that individual levels of TEE are quite variable; they are focusing on identifying factors other than simple anthropometrics that may help predict an individual's energy requirements (Johnson et al. 1997Citation , Toth et al. 1997Citation ).


    Obesity Research.
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Assessment of Energy...
 Assessment of Energy...
 Obesity Research.
 Validating Measurement of Energy...
 REFERENCES
 
Before the DLW method became available for human research, many believed that obese individuals had lower absolute energy requirements than their lean controls. It is now clear that TEE tends to increase with weight and that the obese as a group expend more energy than lean controls (Prentice et al. 1996Citation ). The DLW method has also made it possible to quantitate the energy costs of physical activity in free-living individuals, thus helping to focus research attention on the role of physical activity in the development, maintenance and treatment of obesity (Schoeller 1998Citation ). The DLW method has also been used to demonstrate that the interindividual differences in energy expenditure associated with physical activity are larger than those for RMR or the thermic effect of meals (TEM) and thus more likely to lead to major deficits or surfeits in energy balance. Care is required in the interpretation of such findings, however, because the energy expended in physical activity is calculated by taking the difference between TEE and RMR (with or without correction for TEM). TEE has an uncertainty of 5–10% as a result of random measurement errors; when the difference from RMR is taken, this uncertainty is transferred to the physical activity term. This inflates the apparent between-individual variability in the energy expended in physical activity (Schoeller and Hnilicka 1996Citation ). Other difficulties in the interpretation of TEE data also occur because there is controversy regarding the means of comparing TEE among individuals of different sizes (Dietz 1998Citation ). In planning future studies, there is considerable value in the inclusion of a measurement of RMR so that expenditure can be partitioned between resting and physical activity. Inclusion of TEM is also of some value, but in many instances it is necessary to measure TEM only in a subset of the study population or use literature values because the individual measurement error for TEM is comparable to the interindividual variation.

Considerable research efforts have been directed recently at the study of ethnic differences in energy metabolism to determine whether these may explain the differences in the prevalence of obesity among ethnic groups. During the last few years alone, studies have been performed in three ethnic groups with high prevalences of obesity. Rush et al. (1999)Citation compared adult New Zealanders of European and Polynesian origins. TEE was noted to correlate with body weight in all but the obese subjects of Polynesian origin, suggesting a difference in the factors that control TEE in this group. They also noted that the nonobese Polynesians expended 50% more energy in physical activity than the nonobese Europeans. Sable et al. (1997)Citation compared TEE and RMR between 5-y-old Pima Indians and Caucasians. They could not find differences in energy expenditure after adjusting for body size that would explain the already greater weight and fatness in the Pima Indian children. Three studies comparing African-American and Caucasian children have also been recently performed. Sun et al. (1998)Citation studied children between 5 and 10 y of age and did not find any differences in energy expenditure after adjustment for fat-free mass. Studying a similar number of girls (n = 81) who were somewhat older, Wong et al. (1999)Citation did find that African-American girls expended less energy both at rest and in physical activity. At the other end of the life-span, Carpenter et al. (1998)Citation reported that African-Americans >55 y of age expended 10% less energy than Caucasians. This difference was equally divided between RMR and physical activity. The results from cross-sectional studies, therefore, are still mixed with regard to differences among populations with different tendencies toward the development of obesity, and further studies are warranted.

In addition to cross-sectional studies, three very important longitudinal studies have been performed that investigate the relationship between energy expenditure and weight or fat gain. Stunkard et al. (1999)Citation measured TEE at 3 mo of age and found that it did not predict weight at 1 y, whereas several measures of energy intake did explain a small portion of the variance in weight. Goran et al. (1998)Citation followed 4-y-old children for 4 y and also found that TEE did not explain any of the variation in weight or fat gain. Among adult women who had recently and voluntarily lost weight, Schoeller et al. (1997)Citation also found that energy expended in physical activity was a predictor of weight gain over the next year. It is difficult to compare these four studies, but they do suggest that the role of energy expenditure in weight control may differ with age. At the same time, it must be remembered that comparisons among these studies are limited by the difficulty of adjusting TEE for differences in body size and composition.


    Validating Measurement of Energy Intake.
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Assessment of Energy...
 Assessment of Energy...
 Obesity Research.
 Validating Measurement of Energy...
 REFERENCES
 
Before the development of the DLW method, self-reported habitual energy intake was often used as a proxy measure of TEE. Now it has become clear that TEE obtained from DLW is accurate, and TEE is being used as a biomarker of energy intake. In so doing, significant underreporting of dietary energy intake has been documented (Schoeller 1995Citation ). Because of the importance of self-reported dietary intake in the study of the relationships between diet and health, considerable attention has been directed toward characterizing and understanding the roots of the underreporting.

Three studies characterized the degree of underreporting of dietary energy as part of studies in which the use of self-reported dietary intake is common. Champagne et al. (1998)Citation found that self-reported dietary energy intake was unreliable for the study of the role of energy intake in the etiology of obesity among 10-y-old children. Underreporting ranged from 17 to 30% for groups of obese or nonobese children of different ethnicity. Ambler et al. (1998)Citation reported that self-report was unreliable in determining the effect of physical training on energy intake in adolescents by comparing self-reported energy intake against TEE in a group during training and a control group. Reported energy intakes were comparable in both groups even through expenditure was greater in the group receiving physical training and weight did not change. Finally, Martin et al. (1996)Citation compared self-reported energy intake with TEE in middle-aged women during y 2 of a dietary intervention study. These nonobese women underreported energy intake by 20%, raising further concern about the general accuracy of the intake questionnaires.

Johnson et al. (1998)Citation attempted to validate a multipass 24-h recall method for determining energy intake. They found that underreporting correlated with women being overweight or having poor reading and spelling skills. Finally, Black et al. (1997)Citation compared the utility of three methods of defining underreporting of dietary intake. The found that urinary nitrogen could identify the worst underreporters, but that it was less sensitive than TEE from DLW. They also found that the use of the cut-offs based on calculated RMR (Goldberg et al. 1991Citation ) helped to identify major underreporting, but that these too had limitations.

The application of the DLW method has come full circle. Early studies used the ability to measure expenditure to replace energy intake as a proxy measurement of energy requirements. Now, expenditure from DLW has become a benchmark for validating methods to assess habitual energy intake. Other applications have also proliferated to such a degree that DLW has become a victim of its own success. The demand for 18O has exceeded world-wide production for the past two years, creating a world-wide shortage of the tracer. This is currently curtailing further research, and increased production is required to meet this demand.


    FOOTNOTES
 
1 Supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (DK30031). Back

2 Manuscript received 2 August 1999. Back

3 Abbreviations used: DLW, doubly labeled water; PA, physical activity; RMR, resting metabolic rate; TEE, total (daily) energy expenditure; TEM, thermic effect of meals. Back


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 Assessment of Energy...
 Assessment of Energy...
 Obesity Research.
 Validating Measurement of Energy...
 REFERENCES
 

1. Ambler C., Eliakim A., Brasel J. A., Lee W. N., Burke G., Cooper D. M. Fitness and the effect of exercise training on the dietary intake of healthy adolescents. Int. J. Obes. 1998;22:354-362

2. Baarends E. M., Schols A. M., Westerterp K. P., Wouters E. F. Total daily energy expenditure relative to resting energy expenditure in clinically stable patients with COPD. Thorax 1997;52:780-785[Abstract]

3. Bandini L. G., Cyr H., Must A., Dietz W. H. Validity of reported energy intake in preadolescent girls. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997;65:1138S-1141S[Abstract/Free Full Text]

4. Black A. E., Binghan S. A., Johansson G., Coward W. A. Validation of dietary intakes of protein and energy against 24 hour urinary N and DLW energy expenditure in middle aged women, retired men and post-obese subjects: comparisons with validation against presumed energy requirements. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997;51:405-413[Medline]

5. Black A. E., Coward J. T., Cole T. J., Prentice A. M. Human energy expenditure in affluent societies: an analysis of 574 doubly-labelled water measurements. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996;50:72-92[Medline]

6. Blanc S., Normand S., Ritz P., Pachiaudi C., Vico L., Gharib C., Gauquelin-Koch G. Energy and water metabolism, body composition, and hormonal changes induced by 42 days of enforced inactivity and simulated microgravity. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998;83:4289-4297[Abstract/Free Full Text]

7. Branth S., Hambraeus L, Westerterp K., Anderssen A., Edsgren R., Mustelin M., Nilsson R. Energy turnover in a sailing crew during off-shore racing around the world. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1996;28:1272-1276[Medline]

8. Bratteby L.E., Sandhagen B., Fan H., Enghardt H., Samuelson G. Total energy expenditure and physical activity as assessed by the doubly labeled water method in Swedish adolescents in whom energy intake was underestimated by 7-d diet records. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998;67:905-911[Abstract]

9. Burstein R., Coward A. W., Askew W. E., Carmel K., Irving C., Shpilberg O., Moran D., Pikarsky A., Ginot G., Sawyer M., Golan R., Epstein Y. Energy expenditure variations in soldiers performing military activities under cold and hot climate conditions. Milt. Med. 1996;161:750-754

10. Carpenter W. H., Fonong T., Toth M. J., Ades P. A., Calles-Escandon J., Walston J. D., Poehlman E. T. Total daily energy expenditure in free-living older African-Americans and Caucasians. Am J. Physiol. 1998;274:E96-E101[Abstract/Free Full Text]

11. Champagne C. M., Baker N. B., DeLany J. P., Harsha D. W., Bray G. A. Assessment of energy intake underreporting by doubly labeled water and observations on reported nutrient intakes in children. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1998;98:426-433[Medline]

12. Coplen T. B., Harper I. T. An improved technique for the 2H/1H analysis of urines from diabetic volunteers. Biol. Mass Spectrom. 1994;23:437-439[Medline]

13. Coward W. A. Contributions of the doubly labeled water method to studies of energy balance in the Third World. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998;68:962S-969S[Abstract]

14. Coward W. A., Prentice A. M. Isotope method for the measurement of carbon dioxide production rate in man [letter]. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1985;41:659-663[Free Full Text]

15. Coward W. A., Ritz P., Cole T. J. Revision of calculations in the doubly labeled water method for measurement of energy expenditure in humans [editorial]. Am. J. Physiol. 1994;267:E805-E807[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Davis P.S.W. Energy requirements for growth and development in infancy. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998;68:939S-943S[Abstract]

17. de Meer K., Westerterp K. R., Houwen R. H., Browers H. A., Berger R., Okken A. Total energy expenditure in infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia is associated with respiratory status. Eur. J. Pediatr. 1997;156:299-304[Medline]

18. Dietz W. H. Does energy expenditure affect changes in body fat in children? [editorial]. Am. J. Clin. Nutr 1998;67:190-191[Medline]

19. Eliakim A., Brasel J. A., Mohan S., Wong W.L.T., Cooper D. M. Increased physical activity and the growth hormone-IGF-I axis in adolescents. Am. J. Physiol. 1998;275:R308-R314[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. FAO/WHO/UNU (1985) Energy and protein requirements. Report of a joint FAO/WHO Ad Hoc Expert Committee. FAO/WHO/UNU. Geneva (Tech Report Ser No 724).

21. Goldberg G. R., Black A. E., Jebb S. A., Cole T. J., Murgatroyd P. R., Coward W. A., Prentice A. M. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology: I. Derivation of cut-off limits to identify under-recording. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991;45:569-581[Medline]

22. Goran M. I., Shewchuk R., Gower B. A., Nagy T. R., Carpenter W. H., Johnson R. K. Longitudinal changes in fatness in white children: no effect of childhood energy expenditure. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998;67:309-316[Abstract]

23. Jiang Z., Yan Q., Su Y., Acheson K. J., Thelin A., Piguet-Welsch C., Pitz P., Ho Z. C. Energy expenditure of Chinese infants in Guangong Province, south China, determined with the use of the doubly labeled water method. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998;67:1256-1264[Abstract]

24. Johnson R. K., Hildreth H. G., Contompasis S. H., Goran M. I. Total energy expenditure in adults with cerebral palsy as assessed by doubly labeled water. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1997;97:966-970[Medline]

25. Johnson R. K., Soultanakis R. P., Matthews D. E. Literacy and body fatness are associated with underreporting of energy intake in US low-income women using the multiple-pass 24-hour recall: a doubly labeled water study. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1998;98:1136-1140[Medline]

26. Lane H. W., Gretebeck R. J., Schoeller D. A., Davis-Street J., Socki R. A., Gibson E. K. Comparison of ground-based and space flight energy expenditure and water turnover in middle-aged healthy male US astronauts. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997;65:4-12[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Leitch C. A., Karn C. A., Peppard R. J., Granger D., Liechty E. A., Ensing G. J., Denne S. C. Increased energy expenditure in infants with cyanotic congenital heart disease. J. Pediatr. 1998;133:755-760[Medline]

28. Lifson N., McClintock R. Theory of use of the turnover rates of body water for measuring energy and maternal balance. J. Theor. Biol. 1966;12:46-74[Medline]

29. Martin L. J., Su W., Jones P. J., Lockwood G. A., Tritchler D. L, Boyd N. F. Comparison of energy intakes determined by food records and doubly labeled water in women participating in a dietary intervention trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996;63:483-490[Abstract/Free Full Text]

30. McCallan D. C., Noble C., Balwin C., Jebb S. A., Prentice A. M., Coward W. A., Sawyer M. B., McManus T. J., Griffin G. E. Energy expenditure and wasting in human immunodeficiency virus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 1995;333:88-88

31. Mudambo K. S., Scrimgeor C. M., Rennie M. J. Adequacy of food rations in solders during exercise in hot, day-time conditions assessed by doubly labeled water and energy balance methods. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. Occup. Physiol. 1997;76:364-351

32. National Research Council Recommended Dietary Allowances 10th ed. 1989 National Academy Press Washington, DC.

33. Prentice A. M., Black A. E., Coward W. A., Cole T. J. Energy expenditure in overweight and obese adults in affluent societies: an analysis of 319 doubly-labelled water measurements. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1996;50:93-97[Medline]

34. Pulfrey S. M., Jones P. J. Energy expenditure and requirement while climbing above 6,000 m. J. Appl. Physiol. 1996;81:1306-1311[Abstract/Free Full Text]

35. Roberts S. B, Dietz W., Sharp T., Dallal G. E., Hill J. O. Multiple laboratory comparison of the doubly labeled water technique. Obes. Res. 1995;3:S3-S14[Medline]

36. Rush E. C., Plank L. D., Coward W. A. Energy expenditure of young Polynesian and European women in New Zealand and relations to body composition. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999;69:43-48[Abstract/Free Full Text]

37. Sable A. D., Fontvieille A. M., Harper I. T., Ravussin E. Low levels of physical activity in 5-year-old children. J. Pediatr. 1997;131:423-429[Medline]

38. Schoeller D. A. Use of two-point sampling for the doubly-labelled water method [letter]. Hum. Nutr. Clin. Nutr. 1984;38:477-480[Medline]

39. Schoeller D. A. Measurement of energy expenditure in free-living humans by using doubly labeled water. J. Nutr. 1988;118:1278-1289

40. Schoeller D. A. Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report. Metabolism 1995;44:18-22[Medline]

41. Schoeller D. A. Balancing energy expenditure and body weight. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998;68:956S-961S[Abstract]

42. Schoeller D. A., Hnilicka J. Reliability of the doubly labeled water method for measurement of total daily energy expenditure in free-living subjects. J. Nutr. 1996;126:348S-354S

43. Schoeller D. A., Luke A. H. Rapid 18O analysis of CO2 samples by continuous flow isotope ratio mass spectrometry. J. Mass Spectrom. 1997;32:1332-1336[Medline]

44. Schoeller D. A., Shay K. J., Kushner R. F. How much physical activity is needed to minimize weight gain in previously obese women?. Am J Clin Nutr 1997;66:551-556[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Schoeller D. A., Taylor P. B., Shay K. Analytical requirements for the doubly labeled water method. Obes. Res. 1995;3:S14-S20

46. Schoeller D. A., van Santen E. Measurement of energy expenditure in man by the doubly labeled water method. J. Appl. Physiol. 1982;53:955-959[Abstract/Free Full Text]

47. Speakman J. R. Estimation of the precision in DLW studies using the two-point methodology. Obes. Res. 1995;3:S31-S40

48. Stein, T. P., Leskiw, M. J., Schluter, M. D., Donaldson, M. R. & Larina, I. (1999) Protein kinetics during and after long duration space flight on Mir. Am. J. Physiol. in press.

49. Stunkard A. J., Berkowitz R. I., Stallings V. A., Schoeller D. A. Determinants of change in body size in infancy: energy intake not energy output. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999;69:524-530[Abstract/Free Full Text]

50. Sun M., Gower B. A., Nagy T. R., Trowbridge C. A., Dezenberg C., Goran M. I. Total, resting, and activity-related energy expenditures are similar in Caucasian and African-American children. Am. J. Physiol. 1998;274:E232-E237[Abstract/Free Full Text]

51. Toth M. J., Gottlieb S. S., Fisher M. L., Poehlman E. T. Daily energy requirements in heart failure patients. Metabolism 1997;46:1294-1298[Medline]

52. Treuth M. S., Hunter G. R., Pichon C., Figueroa-Colon R., Goran M. I. Fitness and energy expenditure after strength training in obese prepubertal girls. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1998;30:1130-1136[Medline]

53. Van Etten L. M., Westerterp K. R., Verstappen F. T., Boon B. J., Saris W. H. Effect of an 18-wk weight-training program on energy expenditure and physical activity. J. Appl. Physiol. 1997;82:298-304[Abstract/Free Full Text]

54. Westerterp K. R. Alterations in energy balance with exercise. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998;68:970S-975S[Abstract]

55. Wong W. W., Butte N. F., Ellis K. J., Herenroader A. C., Hill R. B., Stuff J. E., Smith E. O. Pubertal African-American girls expend less energy at rest and during physical activity than Caucasian girls. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1999;84:906-911[Abstract/Free Full Text]

56. Wren R. E., Blume H., Mazariegos M., Solomons N., Alvarez J. O., Goran M. I. Body composition, resting metabolic rate, and energy requirements of short- and normal-stature, low-income Guatemalan children. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997;66:406-412[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
R. L. Prentice, P. A. Shaw, S. A. Bingham, S. A. A. Beresford, B. Caan, M. L. Neuhouser, R. E. Patterson, M. L. Stefanick, S. Satterfield, C. A. Thomson, et al.
Biomarker-calibrated Energy and Protein Consumption and Increased Cancer Risk Among Postmenopausal Women
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2009; 169(8): 977 - 989.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. J Moshfegh, D. G Rhodes, D. J Baer, T. Murayi, J. C Clemens, W. V Rumpler, D. R Paul, R. S Sebastian, K. J Kuczynski, L. A Ingwersen, et al.
The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, August 1, 2008; 88(2): 324 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. L. Neuhouser, L. Tinker, P. A. Shaw, D. Schoeller, S. A. Bingham, L. V. Horn, S. A. A. Beresford, B. Caan, C. Thomson, S. Satterfield, et al.
Use of Recovery Biomarkers to Calibrate Nutrient Consumption Self-Reports in the Women's Health Initiative
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2008; 167(10): 1247 - 1259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
J. L. Locher, C. S. Ritchie, C. O. Robinson, D. L. Roth, D. Smith West, and K. L. Burgio
A Multidimensional Approach to Understanding Under-Eating in Homebound Older Adults: The Importance of Social Factors
Gerontologist, April 1, 2008; 48(2): 223 - 234.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
H. K Neilson, P. J Robson, C. M Friedenreich, and I. Csizmadi
Estimating activity energy expenditure: how valid are physical activity questionnaires?
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2008; 87(2): 279 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. K. Das, C. H Gilhooly, J. K Golden, A. G Pittas, P. J Fuss, R. A Cheatham, S. Tyler, M. Tsay, M. A McCrory, A. H Lichtenstein, et al.
Long-term effects of 2 energy-restricted diets differing in glycemic load on dietary adherence, body composition, and metabolism in CALERIE: a 1-y randomized controlled trial
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2007; 85(4): 1023 - 1030.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. B Heymsfield, J. B Harp, M. L Reitman, J. W Beetsch, D. A Schoeller, N. Erondu, and A. Pietrobelli
Why do obese patients not lose more weight when treated with low-calorie diets? A mechanistic perspective
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, February 1, 2007; 85(2): 346 - 354.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J J. Snodgrass, W. R Leonard, L. A Tarskaia, and D. A Schoeller
Total energy expenditure in the Yakut (Sakha) of Siberia as measured by the doubly labeled water method.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2006; 84(4): 798 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
C. Ruggiero and L. Ferrucci
The endeavor of high maintenance homeostasis: resting metabolic rate and the legacy of longevity.
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., May 1, 2006; 61(5): 466 - 473.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
D. Thompson, A. M. Batterham, S. Bock, C. Robson, and K. Stokes
Assessment of Low-to-Moderate Intensity Physical Activity Thermogenesis in Young Adults Using Synchronized Heart Rate and Accelerometry with Branched-Equation Modeling
J. Nutr., April 1, 2006; 136(4): 1037 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
A. G. Pittas, S. K. Das, C. L. Hajduk, J. Golden, E. Saltzman, P. C. Stark, A. S. Greenberg, and S. B. Roberts
A Low-Glycemic Load Diet Facilitates Greater Weight Loss in Overweight Adults With High Insulin Secretion but Not in Overweight Adults With Low Insulin Secretion in the CALERIE Trial
Diabetes Care, December 1, 2005; 28(12): 2939 - 2941.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T. A Wadden, G. D Foster, D. B Sarwer, D. A Anderson, M. Gladis, R. S Sanderson, R. Letchak, R. I Berkowitz, and S. Phelan
Dieting and the development of eating disorders in obese women: results of a randomized controlled trial
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, September 1, 2004; 80(3): 560 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. K. Das, E. Saltzman, M. A. McCrory, L. K. G. Hsu, S. A. Shikora, G. Dolnikowski, J. J. Kehayias, and S. B. Roberts
Energy Expenditure Is Very High in Extremely Obese Women
J. Nutr., June 1, 2004; 134(6): 1412 - 1416.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
R J. Stubbs, D. A Hughes, A. M Johnstone, G. W Horgan, N. King, and J. E Blundell
A decrease in physical activity affects appetite, energy, and nutrient balance in lean men feeding ad libitum
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2004; 79(1): 62 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. B. Dixon, F. J. Cronin, and S. M. Krebs-Smith
Let the Pyramid Guide Your Food Choices: Capturing the Total Diet Concept
J. Nutr., February 1, 2001; 131(2): 461S - 472.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schoeller, D. A.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1999 by American Society for Nutrition