Journal of Nutrition EB Program 2010 Early Registration

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffer, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffer, L. J.

The Journal of Nutrition Vol. 128 No. 2 February 1998, pp. 333S-336S

Adaptation to Protein Restriction Is Impaired in Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus1,2

L. John Hoffer

Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Sir Mortimer B. Davis-Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec H3T 1E2, Canada

    ABSTRACT
Abstract
Introduction
References

Although mild abnormalities of amino acid metabolism frequently exist in conventionally treated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), their physiologic and nutritional importance is uncertain. We tested whether a tendency toward body N loss can be either masked or revealed in insulin-treated IDDM by changing the level of protein in the diet. After adaptation to a protein-free diet adequate in all other nutrients, obligatory urinary N excretion of intensively treated IDDM subjects was significantly greater than normal, indicating an impaired ability to recycle endogenous amino acids during protein restriction. When the preceding diet was high in protein, urea N production after consumption of a mixed test meal matched the amount of N consumed for both normal and diabetic subjects. However, when the test meal was preceded by 5 d of protein restriction, conventionally treated IDDM subjects failed to adaptively reduce postprandial urea production as effectively as normal or intensively treated IDDM subjects. Thus, even during insulin treatment, the ability to maximally recycle endogenous amino acids is impaired in IDDM, as is the ability to adaptively increase dietary amino acid retention in response to protein restriction.

KEY WORDS: nutrition · malnutrition · urea · amino acids · fed state

    INTRODUCTION
Abstract
Introduction
References

Protein wasting has long been known to accompany untreated or poorly treated insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) (Bliss 1982), but only in recent years has a detailed metabolic description of this phenomenon begun to emerge. Modern tracer studies reveal that even transient insulin withdrawal induces intense and prolonged body protein catabolism (Nair et al. 1983 and 1987, Umpleby et al. 1986). After insulin was introduced into clinical medicine, cases of extreme insulin lack and protein-wasting in IDDM became rare (Bliss 1982). Nevertheless, even modern intensive insulin regimens do not fully normalize insulin physiology, and the conventional twice-daily insulin therapy still used by the majority of diabetic persons is frequently associated with biochemical abnormalities of amino acid and energy metabolism (Carlson and Campbell 1993, Gebre-Medhin et al. 1985, Rudolf et al. 1982, Tamborlane et al. 1979). Are these abnormalities physiologically or nutritionally important?

Protein wasting does not occur in adults with insulin-treated IDDM (Rosenfalck et al. 1994); thus the physiologic consequences of residual abnormalities of protein metabolism in treated IDDM, if indeed there are any, must either be subtle and difficult to detect, or they emerge only in certain situations. In our research, we predicted that a tendency toward protein wasting in IDDM could be either masked or revealed if we varied the major factor that normally regulates body protein economy: the level of protein consumption.

It is easy to understand how a mild defect in the ability to suppress amino acid oxidation could be masked by a high protein intake. A person whose protein intake is above the requirement level will normally catabolize amino acids at the same rate at which they are consumed. Because most people consume about twice the normal protein requirement, there is no physiologic need to conserve dietary amino acids efficiently to maintain protein balance. To detect subtle defects in protein metabolism, it is first necessary to reduce habitual protein consumption to near or below the requirement level.

    PROTEIN REQUIREMENT OF NORMAL AND DIABETIC SUBJECTS MEASURED BY THE FACTORIAL METHOD

The factorial method was the first technique systematically used to estimate the adult protein requirement (Munro 1985). It is so named because it involves adding the factors (urinary, fecal and other) that contribute to body N loss. These losses are measured after several days of adaptation to a protein-free diet on the assumption that the lowest rate of endogenous amino acid catabolism and N excretion the body can achieve under these conditions---its "obligatory" N loss---is the minimum amount of protein needed from the diet to maintain N balance. Urinary obligatory N is by far the most important factor contributing to total obligatory N, and it has been found to be highly constant when measured in many different studies (FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation 1985).

Although nearly a century old, the concept of obligatory N is best explained by using modern terms of protein turnover. When the diet is protein free, whole-body amino acid oxidation represents the excess of endogenous protein breakdown over protein synthesis. After full metabolic adaptation to a protein-free diet, amino acid oxidation and N excretion become a precise index of the maximum efficiency with which endogenous amino acids can be recycled. To determine whether maximum amino acid reutilization is impaired in IDDM, we measured the rate of body protein oxidation of normal subjects and subjects with uncomplicated IDDM after adaptation to a control diet containing a relatively generous amount of protein [1.2 g/(kg·d)] and then again after full adaptation to a protein-free, but maintenance-energy and otherwise nutritionally adequate diet (Lariviere et al. 1992). All subjects lived in the metabolic unit for the duration of the study; the blood glucose level of the diabetic subjects was measured at least seven times daily and regulated by using a portable continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pump. Our intention was to normalize the blood glucose level of these subjects to the maximum extent possible in a clinically plausible scenario. As a result of this approach, the blood glucose parameters of our diabetic subjects fell well within published guidelines for intensive insulin therapy (DCCT Research Group 1986). Metabolic adaptation was measured by using two different methods. The first was postabsorptive plasma leucine oxidation, which was measured after adaptation to each of the diets and (for the diabetic subjects) during strict euglycemia maintained by an intravenous insulin infusion. The second was daily urinary N excretion, which had reached an apparent steady state after 7 d of adaptation to the protein-free diet, and hence represented obligatory urinary N excretion. Because the urinary measurement indicated amino acid oxidation over the entire day, it accounted for variations in amino acid oxidation associated with a clinically feasible intensity of diabetic control. These effects would not be revealed during a short-term tracer leucine oxidation study conducted during strict euglycemia.

With subjects consuming the high protein diet and during strict euglycemia, post-absorptive plasma leucine appearance and oxidation of the diabetic and normal subjects were similar; after adaptation to the protein-free diet, leucine appearance and oxidation decreased to the same extent (17 and 55%, respectively) for both groups. This indicated that insulin therapy of IDDM that accomplishes strict euglycemia is compatible with a normal maximum efficiency of amino acid recycling.

Average obligatory urinary N excretion (± SD) of the normal subjects was 39.4 ± 7.3 mg/(kg·d), in close agreement with other determinations of normal adult obligatory urinary N excretion (Bodwell et al. 1979, FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation 1985). This N excretion rate was also appropriate for the total amino acid oxidation rate indicated by their short-term postabsorptive leucine oxidation data (Lariviere et al. 1992). This confirmed that the urinary N excretion of normal people consuming a protein-free diet is constant over the entire day (Steffee et al. 1981).

By contrast, daily obligatory urinary N excretion of the diabetic subjects was 18% higher than normal, 46.3 ± 9.9 mg/(kg·d) (P < 0.05). This indicated that their rate of protein oxidation measured over the entire day was greater than when measured during strict euglycemia. It appeared, therefore, that a clinically feasible intensive insulin regimen, which is less intense than strict euglycemia, was not compatible with maximum efficiency of endogenous amino acid conservation in IDDM.

Although obligatory urinary N excretion was greater than normal in the diabetic group as a whole, individual values were higher for some subjects than for others. Could differences in the effectiveness of the intensive insulin regimen of different individuals account for this variation in obligatory N? If this was indeed the case, there should be a direct relationship between average daily blood glucose, the standard measure of the intensity of insulin therapy, and obligatory N excretion. This proved to be the case because obligatory N and average blood glucose were strongly correlated (r2 = 0.94; P < 0.0002). This suggests that even within the range of intensities of insulin therapy considered "intensive," there remain subtle impairments in amino acid recycling efficiency.

    FED STATE PROTEIN METABOLISM AFTER PROTEIN RESTRICTION

Although the factorial method can be a sensitive research tool for detecting subtle impairments of metabolic adaptation, it does not represent a realistic clinical situation. Moreover, it assumes that amino acids lost from the body can be replaced with perfect efficiency from the diet. In reality, there is considerable variation in the retention of dietary amino acids during their initial distribution and metabolism in the body (Millward 1994). This explains why the average daily protein requirement indicated by the factorial method (0.34 g protein/kg adult body weight) is substantially less than the value of 0.60 g/kg indicated by more detailed studies that include several test levels of protein intake (FAO/WHO/UNU Expert Consultation 1985).

To test whether dietary amino acids are retained efficiently in IDDM, we designed an "oral protein tolerance test." This test required subjects to consume a meal that combined the liquid food products Ensure HN and Glucerna (both from Ross Laboratories, Columbus OH) to provide 0.5 g/kg of protein, 10 kcal/kg and enough soluble fiber to prevent the abnormally rapid carbohydrate absorption characteristic of most defined liquid formula products (Peters and Davidson 1992). We named this test by analogy with the glucose tolerance test. Because an abnormal glucose tolerance test indicates impaired disposal of an oral glucose load, abnormal "protein tolerance" would be indicated by abnormal disposal of a protein load, resulting in an abnormally high post-prandial urea production rate.

Normal subjects and subjects with uncomplicated IDDM were admitted to the metabolic unit; the latter were either treated intensively as before or with a conventional insulin regimen of two daily injections of a mixture of intermediate- and short-acting insulin. Oral protein tolerance was measured after adaptation to a relatively generous protein intake [1.2 g/(kg·d)] and then again after 5 d of adaptation to a protein-free diet (Hoffer et al. 1997). Amino acid oxidation was inferred from urinary urea excretion over the 9 h after the test meal was consumed, with a correction for changes in the body urea pool size. Net protein utilization (NPU) was calculated as (Nin - urea N production)/Nin. It should be noted that this measurement of urea production ignores the fact that some newly synthesized urea is hydrolyzed in the gut and hence is not detected by a nonisotopic method based on urinary urea excretion (Taveroff et al. 1993). However, by including a tracer dose of [13C]urea in several of the test meals and measuring its recovery in urine and plasma, we determined that neither dietary condition nor the presence of hyperglycemia affected this source of unmeasured urea loss. (Approximately 75% of the [13C]urea in each test meal was recovered in urine and plasma under all conditions.) In each test meal, we also included a tracer of the rapidly transaminated amino acid, [15N]alanine, in order to estimate "first-pass" dietary amino acid catabolism, with resulting appearance of the label in plasma and urinary urea (Freyse et al. 1987).

 
View this table:
[in this window] [in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of prior adaptation to protein restriction on the metabolic response to a test meal1

When the high protein diet was consumed, total N balance of all three subject groups was close to zero, as anticipated. Blood glucose levels of the intensively and conventionally treated diabetic subjects were well within the ranges that define these different intensities of insulin therapy (DCCT Research Group 1993). In particular, during the first test meal, the 2-h postprandial blood glucose rose to only 7.5 mmol/L in the intensively treated subjects but to 16.9 mmol/L in the conventionally-treated subjects. Despite these differences in postprandial blood glucose, urea excretion and the transfer of the 15N in the test meal into urea were similar for all three groups (Table 1). NPU was similarly low, confirming our supposition that persons adapted to a surfeit protein intake will oxidize amino acids at a rate equivalent to what is consumed in a generous test meal, irrespective of other metabolic factors.

Five days of protein restriction changed the test meal response considerably. Although postprandial blood glucose increases were similar to those after the first test meal, urea excretion was strongly reduced and NPU increased for all subject groups (Table 1). However, although urea excretion of the intensively treated subjects was reduced to a value comparable to that of the normal subjects, urea excretion by the conventionally treated group was 19% higher (P < 0.05) and their NPU correspondingly lower (Table 1). Also, although transfer of the 15N in the test meal into urea was reduced for all groups after the second test meal, this reduction was less effective for the conventionally treated diabetic subjects than for the normal and intensively treated diabetic subjects (P < 0.05). From this experiment, we concluded that although intensively treated diabetic subjects reduce postprandial amino acid oxidation as effectively as nondiabetic subjects after dietary protein restriction, the adaptation of conventionally treated diabetic subjects is impaired.

    CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These results indicate that adaptation to dietary protein restriction involves an increase in endogenous amino acid reutilization and increased dietary amino acid retention after a standard mixed meal. This latter process is impaired during conventional IDDM treatment, but not during intensive treatment. Maximum endogenous amino acid reutilization is impaired even during intensive diabetic therapy, and it varies intimately with the deviation from fully physiologic insulin replacement. Because a high efficiency of dietary amino acid retention and endogenous amino acid recycling becomes necessary only when dietary protein intake is restricted, diabetic adults whose protein intake is ample will normally be protected from protein wasting. The precise combination of protein restriction and imperfect metabolic control that will result in clinical protein wasting cannot be predicted from this research. Both, however, are important.

    FOOTNOTES
1   Presented as part of the symposium "Nutritional Implications of Dietary Protein Restriction in Diabetes Mellitus" given at the Experimental Biology 97 meeting, April 7, 1997, New Orleans, LA. This symposium was sponsored by the American Society for Nutritional Sciences and was supported by educational grants from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories, Inc., Finnigan MAT, Isotec, Inc., Martek Biosciences Corp. and Ross Products Division, Abbott Laboratories. Guest editor for the symposium publication was L. John Hoffer, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
2   Supported by the Medical Research Council of Canada.

    LITERATURE CITED
Abstract
Introduction
References

0022-3166/98 $3.00 ©1998 American Society for Nutritional Sciences
[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
M. J. Hamadeh and L. J. Hoffer
Effect of protein restriction on sulfur amino acid catabolism in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2003; 284(2): E382 - E389.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoffer, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoffer, L. J.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1998 by American Society for Nutrition