Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisler, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Warden, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisler, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Warden, C. H.

The Journal of Nutrition Vol. 127 No. 9 September 1997, pp. 1909S-1916S
Copyright ©1997 by the American Society for Nutritional Sciences

Mapping of Mouse Obesity Genes: A Generic Approach to a Complex Trait1

Janis S. Fisler*, 2 and Craig H. Wardendagger

* Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095 and dagger  Department of Pediatrics and Rowe Program in Genetics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616

ABSTRACT
CLASSICAL STRATEGIES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF GENES
APPLICATIONS OF QTL MAPPING TO OBESITY
FOOTNOTES
LITERATURE CITED


ABSTRACT

Identification of genes underlying any complex trait such as obesity is an important and difficult problem in genetics. Traditional candidate gene approaches cannot be relied on to identify all of the genes influencing a complex trait, and positional cloning is very laborious. With the advent of new tools and methods, however, comprehensive approaches to the identification of any genes underlying complex traits are now available. Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping is a general technique to map Mendelian factors influencing complex traits. The QTL approach involves the crossing of two strains that differ in the trait of interest to produce F2 or back-cross progeny, individually phenotyping and genotyping each progeny, and statistically associating the typed markers and the phenotype. QTL mapping has been used in the last 4 years to map genes for a wide variety of traits, including body weight and growth, obesity, atherosclerosis and susceptibility to cancer in the mouse, and hypertension, hyperactivity and arthritis in the rat. QTL mapping has also been used to map genes in pigs, poultry, cows, fish and plants. Once a trait has been located in a chromosomal subregion, identifying the underlying gene remains a significant problem. A monogenic model must be developed, isolating one gene influencing a trait from other genes affecting the same phenotype. Then the positional candidate strategy, which relies on a combination of mapping to a chromosomal subregion followed by a survey of the interval to see if attractive candidates reside there, becomes practical.

KEY WORDS: genetics · percentage body fat


CLASSICAL STRATEGIES FOR IDENTIFICATION OF GENES

Ideally, a gene causing obesity can be identified based on physiologic or biochemical understanding of its function. There are dozens of candidate genes for obesity, including genes controlling differentiation of adipocytes, adipocyte specific adrenergic receptors, factors produced by adipocytes, uncoupling proteins, enzymes of energy metabolism and central mechanisms, such as genes for neurochemicals and their receptors. Examples of genes that have been shown to affect body weight regulation in mice when over- or underexpressed include type II glucocorticoid receptor (Pepin et al. 1992), transforming growth factor-alpha (Luetteke et al. 1993), GLUT4 (Gnudi et al. 1995, Katz et al. 1995), glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Kozak et al. 1991), the 5-HT2c serotonin receptor (Tecott et al. 1995) and mitochrondrial uncouplingprotein (Kopecky et al. 1995). The most remarkable feature of these six models is that each influences body weight through different pathways. Although there has been at least one clear success with the beta 3-adrenergic receptor (Clement et al. 1995), human studies of candidate genes for obesity have proven difficult.

Alternatively, a gene causing obesity can be isolated without using any functional knowledge by positional cloning based on linkage information from human families or animal models, as has been accomplished for many genes, including the Lep (Zhang et al. 1994), tub (Kleyn et al. 1996, Noben-Trauth et al. 1996) and agouti (Bultman et al. 1992, Miller et al. 1993) genes causing monogenic obesity in mice. The remaining two genes causing obesity in mice were also recently identified. The cloning of Lep allowed the expression cloning of its receptor, Lepr (Tartaglia et al. 1995), whereas Cpefat was identified by a positional candidate approach. As with the over- and underexpression studies mentioned above, the cloning of these mouse obesity genes identified pathways that were previously unknown. Positional cloning may be possible for genes producing rare monogenic syndromes in humans that include obesity as a phenotype, but little progress has been made.

Difficulties with direct positional cloning of obesity genes may be overcome by cloning of genes in animal models, followed by studies of that gene in humans (Friedman et al. 1991). Positional cloning, however, requires that the model be monogenic and that the chromosomal location of the gene be precisely known. The identification of multiple genes that contribute to a complex phenotype requires strategies differing from classical single-gene/single-protein studies (Frankel 1995). Whole-genome searches in multigenic animal models can be conducted without any previous knowledge of the underlying genes and can identify chromosomal regions controlling a complex trait. Whole-genome searches thus focus attention on specific chromosomal regions that can be isolated and narrowed in congenic strains, then searched for candidate genes or subjected to positional cloning strategies.

Compared with studies of humans, genetic studies in animals are faster and often allow a more detailed and accurate description of phenotype (Lander and Schork 1994, Warden and Fisler 1994). Mice will often be the animal model of choice for genetic studies because of the availability of hundreds of inbred and congenic strains as well as a dense genetic map and physical mapping tools. Moreover, the homologous regions of mouse and human chromosomes are so well defined that it is frequently possible to identify the chromosomal location of a gene in humans by mapping it in mice, often with more precision than is provided by human mapping studies (Copeland et al. 1993). Because of their larger size, rats are used more extensively than mice for physiologic and biochemical studies of energy homeostasis. A number of well-characterized strains are available (Schemmel et al. 1970, Schork et al. 1995); as a result of the rapidly expanding rat genetic map, these will be very useful in identifying genes regulating energy balance. Other critical advantages of studies of mice and rats include the ability to manipulate diet and to obtain any tissue at various times during development. Thus, many studies are more practical in animals than in humans, including studies of diet-responsiveness, longitudinal studies and studies of critical periods in the development of obesity.

Quantitative trait locus mapping. Quantitative trait locus (QTL)3 mapping is a method for mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits, in virtually any animal model, by using genetic linkage maps (Jacob et al. 1991, Lander and Botstein 1989, Paterson et al. 1988). QTL mapping, like positional cloning, requires no knowledge of, or assumptions concerning, the biological nature of the trait being tracked. This technique has been applied to the mapping of Mendelian factors that underlie quantitative variables in obesity (Pomp et al. 1994, Taylor and Phillips 1996, Warden et al. 1993 and 1995, West et al. 1994a and 1994b, York et al. 1996), body weight or growth (Cheverud et al. 1996, Collins et al. 1993, Dragani et al. 1995, Hastings and Veerkamp 1993, Keightley et al. 1996, Rance et al. 1994), atherosclerosis (Hyman et al. 1994, Purcell-Huynh et al. 1995), cancer susceptibility (Fijneman et al. 1996, Nagase et al. 1996), epilepsy (Frankel et al. 1995b) and activity (Hofstetter et al. 1995) in mice, and hypertension (Clark et al. 1996, Deng et al. 1994, Hilbert et al. 1991, Jacob et al. 1991, Samani et al. 1996, Schork et al. 1995), hyperactivity (Moisan et al. 1996) and arthritis (Remmers et al. 1996) in rats. The QTL method can identify chromosomal regions regulating a trait in any animal model system for which two key resources are available, that is, genetically divergent strains and a linkage map covering all of the genome (Lander and Botstein 1989).

The four steps of QTL mapping, which are illustrated in Figure 1, are as follows: 1 ) two different inbred strains are first crossed to produce F2 or back-cross progeny; 2 ) phenotypes are assayed for all of the progeny; 3 ) all of the progeny are individually genotyped for markers that are spread throughout the genome; and 4 ) statistical associations of markers and phenotypes are performed to identify loci underlying the traits.


Fig. 1. Steps in quantitative trait locus mapping.
[View Larger Version of this Image (39K GIF file)]

Inbred strains, produced by 20 or more generations of brother × sister matings, provide the basic resource for analysis of both monogenic and multigenic traits. The genes passed on by any one animal of an inbred strain will be identical to those of any other animal of that strain, thus providing an invariant gene pool that can be used for all subsequent phenotyping and genotyping experiments. Ideally, the mean values of the trait under consideration of the parental strains should differ by at least two standard deviations. However, different strains may coincidentally have similar phenotypes, while exhibiting substantial genetic differences. In crosses involving such parental strains, the phenotypes of the progeny are expected to span a much wider range of values than do the phenotypes of the parents. One such instance of this phenomenon, the obesity of BSB mice, is discussed below. Once the model is chosen, a cross is set up between the two genetically divergent strains. The resulting F1 mice are then either crossed with each other to produce F2 progeny or mated to one of the parental strains to produce back-cross progeny, and the resulting progeny are used for the phenotyping and genotyping studies.

The methods used for phenotyping should be the most specific and precise measurements available. For example, the percentage of body fat is a better measure of obesity than body weight or body mass index. Particular care should be taken to minimize the error of the assay and environmental differences, because nongenetic variation will reduce the power of the method (Paterson et al. 1991). QTL mapping can be applied to any continuously varying trait, such as the percentage of body fat, oxygen consumption and weight gain induced by early overfeeding, or to yes/no traits by using a chi 2 analysis.

Genotyping identifies which of the two parental strains (1 or 2 in Fig. 1) has contributed alleles at a specific locus in each F2 or back-cross animal. The two most common methods for genotyping are polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay of simple sequence repeats (SSR) and restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP) of cDNA or genomic clones. The most common SSR consists of a variable number of cytosine-adenine repeats (CA)n. It is present at ~100,000 copies per genome and is so polymorphic that any two inbred mouse strains will, on average, be polymorphic at 50 % of existing SSR loci (Dietrich et al. 1992). Genotyping with SSR primers is faster and cheaper than RFLP and is generally the method of choice. Genotyping by RFLP remains useful when testing a specific candidate gene for association with a trait.

A linear regression of phenotype on genotype, such as an ANOVA, is the classical method for determining if the mean phenotype values of progeny with different genotypes at a specific marker are significantly different. If Strains 1 and 2 denote inbred strains (Fig. 1) and we assume a back cross with Strain 2 as the recurrent parent, then there would be two possible genotypes at each marker in the back-cross progeny, aa' and a'a'. In F2 mice, there would be three possible genotypes, aa, aa' and a'a'. Finding a significant phenotypic difference between animals with different genotypes suggests that a gene to which the marker is tightly linked controls a measurably detectable difference in the phenotype. This approach is limited by both the number and spacing of the individual markers genotyped, because linear regression can be used only to detect association at each genotyped marker.

QTL analysis requires the construction of genetic linkage maps of ordered markers that can be constructed from primary data using the MAPMAKER/QTL (Lander and Botstein 1989, Lander and Schork 1994, Lander et al. 1987, Paterson et al. 1988) or MapManager/QT software. These genetic linkage maps are used with quantitative phenotype data to locate QTL by an efficient interval mapping method that calculates log-of-the-odds (LOD) scores for each quantitative trait at 1- to 2-cM intervals between each marker. LOD scores provide a measure of the significance of association of a trait and genotype as the log 10 of the likelihood of the odds ratio (LOD). LOD scores of 3.3 and 4.3 or greater are considered statistically significant evidence of association in back-cross and intercross mice, respectively (Lander and Kruglyak 1995). Statistical models for the analysis of multiple QTL (Jansen 1994, Jansen and Stam 1994) and multistep analyses (Schork et al. 1995) have been developed.


APPLICATIONS OF QTL MAPPING TO OBESITY

QTL mapping has been used to identify chromosomal loci linked to obesity in a number of different mouse crosses. As discussed in greater detail below, QTL mapping has been applied to spontaneous obesity in a cross of Mus spretus with C57BL/6J (BSB), with identification of loci promoting obesity on chromosomes 6, 7, 12 and 15 (Warden et al. 1993 and 1995). QTL mapping has also been used to identify loci underlying diet-induced obesity in four different crosses. In an F2 cross between mouse strains SWR/J and AKR/J, whole-genome mapping revealed loci linked to adiposity on chromosomes 4, 9 and 15 (West et al. 1994a and 1994b). In another cross from the same laboratory, this time between CAST/Ei and C57BL/6J strains, the chromosome 15 locus was again identified (York et al. 1996). With the use of the technique of selective DNA pooling in a cross between 129/Sv and EL/Suz mouse strains, QTL for body fat were identified on chromosomes 1 and 7 (Taylor and Phillips 1996). A QTL for body fat was identified on chromosome 2 in a cross between the strain M16i, which was selected for high body weight gain, and CAST (Pomp et al. 1994). Finally, we identified a locus on distal chromosome 2 in an F2 intercross between NZB/BINJ and Sm/J mice (Lembertas, et al. 1997). It is not surprising that a particular locus is not identified in all crosses examined. To identify a QTL, the parental strains used in the cross must be genetically divergent at that locus. If the parental strains carry the same allele at a particular locus, the locus would not contribute to phenotypic variation in that cross and no QTL would be found.

It is difficult to determine the number of new obesity genes identified by these few studies mapping obesity loci. Several of these QTL are in the same chromosomal regions and may be the same gene. It is likely that the chromosome 15 locus found in the SWR/J × AKR/J, CAST/Ei × C57BL/6J, and C57BL/6J × Mus spretus (BSB) crosses are identical. The BSB mice were maintained on a standard laboratory diet, whereas the SWR/J × AKR/J and CAST/Ei × C57BL/6J crosses were maintained on a high fat, high sucrose "obesifying" diet. It is also likely that the loci identified on distal chromosome 2 in the standard diet-fed M16i × CAST cross and the high fat, high cholesterol diet fed NZB/BINJ × SM/J cross are identical. Thus, the chromosome 15 and chromosome 2 obesity loci do not appear to be influenced by diet composition. Loci on chromosomes 4 and 9 were identified only in mice fed a diet defined as "obesifying" and could reflect diet-responsive obesity genes.

Because variations in environment, including variations in diet, across the study subjects will increase the variance due to nongenetic factors, it is important to reduce such variation (Paterson et al. 1991). Certainly, standard laboratory diets from different suppliers and even from different lots from one supplier vary in composition, particularly in type of fat used in diet formulation (Lardinois et al. 1989). It is, therefore, preferable that defined diets be used in QTL studies.

A number of these QTL for body fat are near the mapped positions for the single-gene mutations causing obesity. The chromosome 6 locus that was identified in BSB mice is very near the Lep gene (Warden et al. 1993 and 1995) at which the Lepob mutation causes massive obesity in mice (Zhang et al. 1994); there is preliminary evidence that Lep alleles influence fat pad weight in this cross (Warden et al. 1996). Similarly, the chromosome 7 locus in BSB mice includes the tub gene, which causes maturity-onset obesity in mice (Kleyn et al. 1996, Noben-Trauth et al. 1996). The chromosome 4 locus identified in the SWR/J × AKR/J cross includes the Lepr gene (West et al. 1994b), which codes for the leptin receptor (Tartaglia et al. 1995); our laboratory has shown that AKR/J mice fed a high fat diet are resistant to exogenous leptin (Lembertas et al. 1996a and 1996b). Finally, the locus we identified on distal chromosome 2 in the NZB/BINJ × Sm/J cross (Lembertas et al. 1997) contains the agouti gene whose mutations (Ay, Avy) result in the obesity of the yellow (agouti) mouse (Bultman et al. 1992, Miller et al. 1993). It thus seems likely that normal genetic variation in these genes contributes to multigenic obesity.

QTL mapping has also been applied to crosses involving lines of mice that have been divergently selected for body weight or fat content or body weight gain. F2 populations of crosses selected for low × high body weight lines and low × high body fat lines revealed a QTL on the proximal X chromosome for body weight but not for body fat (Hastings and Veerkamp 1993, Rance et al. 1994). Still other studies have identified QTL for growth or body weight in mice (Cheverud et al. 1996, Collins et al. 1993, Dragani et al. 1995, Keightley et al. 1996) and pigs (Andersson et al. 1994, Clamp et al. 1972).


Fig. 2. Linkage maps for chromosomes 6,7,12 and 15 for BSB mice (from Warden et al. 1995). Linkage maps were constructed from 253 BSB mice from the cross of SPRET/Pt × C57BL/6J using the MAPMAKER 3.0 program. Distances are in Kosambi centimorgans.
[View Larger Version of this Image (33K GIF file)]

QTL mapping in BSB mice. A cross between the strains Mus spretus and C57BL/6J was originally designed to use as a mapping resource and for genetic studies of cholesterol (Warden et al. 1993). However, we observed varying degrees of obesity among back-cross animals (BSB mice) even though both parental strains are relatively lean (Fisler et al. 1993). BSB mice are back-cross progeny resulting from the cross of (C57BL/6J × Mus spretus) F1 females with C57BL/6J males. Because F1 males are infertile, only F1 females are useful in this cross. The parental strains differ somewhat in the percentage of body fat: C57BL/6J mice have ~8 % body fat, whereas the M. spretus strain has ~2% body fat (P < 0.05). The (C57BL/6J × Mus spretus) F1 progeny were similar to the C57BL/6J parent. In contrast, BSB backcross progeny ranged from <1 to 65 % body fat, far outside the range observed in either parent or in the F1 mice. The simplest model for this observation is that obesity results from the interactions of two genes, and that one locus must be homozygous for C57BL/6J alleles (BB), while the other locus is heterozygous (SB) because this is the only combination of two genes that is unique to back-cross mice.

BSB mice were examined for measures of obesity including percentage of body fat, body mass index, weight of fat pads and for biochemical parameters related to obesity, including glucose, insulin, corticosterone, glycerol, plasma triglycerides, nonesterified fatty acids and total and HDL cholesterol. Unlike the single-gene recessive obesities, there was an increase in fat-free tissue with increasing carcass fat (Fisler et al. 1993). The most notable biochemical variable was the lack of response of corticosterone to ACTH stimulation in obese BSB mice (Fisler et al. 1993, Pace et al. 1993).

BSB mice (n = 412) were typed for 148 markers covering all chromosomes except the Y chromosome (all Y chromosomes in BSB mice are from the C57BL/6J parent). Figure 2 shows the markers typed on chromsomes 6, 7, 12 and 15 in the BSB mice (Warden et al. 1995). We searched for genetic loci underlying the obesity phenotypes that were measured in BSB mice by using the MAPMAKER/QTL program (Paterson et al. 1988), which calculates the strength of associations between genotypes and phenotypes as the log10 of the likelihood of the odds ratio (LOD) score (Fig. 3). It has been calculated that, in a mouse back cross, a LOD score of 3.3 is the threshold for statistically significant linkage (Lander and Kruglyak 1995).


Fig. 3. Log-of-the-odds (LOD) likelihood plot for plasma cholesterol levels, hepatic lipase activity and percentage of body fat, adjusted for a linear effect of age, on chromosome 7 (modified from Warden et al. 1993). The y-axis shows the LOD score calculated by the MAPMAKER/QTL program at 2-cM intervals. The x-axis shows the genetic distances of markers in centimorgans.
[View Larger Version of this Image (24K GIF file)]

To date, we have identified four chromosomal loci that contribute to obesity in BSB mice: obesity results from the heterozygous SB genotype at three loci and from the homozygous BB genotype at one locus. These four loci explain <50% of the variation in percentage of body fat in BSB mice, suggesting that additional genes, perhaps with effects too small to detect in this experiment, contribute to obesity in this model. It is also possible that interactions among the QTL contributed to phenotypic variance (Paterson et al. 1991). We observed that the markers D7Mit8 and D7Ucla1 on distal mouse chromosome 7 were significantly linked with percentage of body fat (peak LOD score 4.2), total plasma cholesterol (LOD score 4.4) and hepatic lipase (HL) activity (LOD score 5.1) (Fig. 3, 4) (Warden et al. 1993 and 1995). The chromosome 7 locus explained 6.5% of the variance in the percentage of body fat. Mice that were heterozygous for Mus spretus and C57BL/6J alleles at the D7Mit8 marker had 28% more body fat than mice that were homozygous for C57BL/6J alleles at that locus (P < 0.0003). A locus on mouse chromosome 6 near the marker D6Mit1, which lies very near the Lep gene, exhibited a LOD score of 4.8, explaining 7.1% of the variance in femoral fat pad weight, and a LOD score of 3.4 for total plasma cholesterol (Fig. 4) (Warden et al. 1993 and 1995). Mice that were heterozygous at the D6Mit1 locus had ~twofold heavier femoral fat pads than mice that were homozygous C57BL/6J at that locus (P < 0.0001). A third locus was found on mouse chromosome 12 near the marker D12Mit27. It exhibited a LOD score of 4.8 and explained 7% of the variance in percentage of fat (Fig. 4). Mice that were heterozygous at the D12Mit27 locus had 44% greater body fat than mice homozygous for C57BL/6J alleles at that locus (P < 0.0002). A fourth locus was identified in BSB mice on mouse chromosome 15 near D15Mit13 (LOD score 3.4) explaining 5.9% of the variance in mesenteric fat. Mice heterozygous at this locus had 32% smaller mesenteric fat pads than mice that were homozygous for C57BL/6J alleles (P < 0.0001). Each of the four loci identified in BSB mice does not appear to act in an additive manner with the other three loci. Mus spretus alleles promote obesity at the chromosome 6, 7, and 12 loci, whereas C57BL/6J alleles promote obesity at the chromosome 15 locus. Furthermore, the chromosome 15 locus appears to promote obesity only if the homozygous C57BL/6J genotype occurs on a background where the chromosome 6, 7 and 12 loci are all heterozygotes (Fig. 5).


Fig. 4. Log-of-the-odds (LOD) scores for obesity and associated phenotypes at the four loci identified in BSB mice. Peak LOD scores are shown for hepatic lipase activity, plasma total cholesterol, percentage of body fat, and mesenteric and femoral fat pads on chromosomes 6, 7, 12 and 15 (from Warden et al. 1995).
[View Larger Version of this Image (34K GIF file)]


Fig. 5. Genotypic interactions of the obesity loci identified in BSB mice. For each quantitative trait locus (QTL), the Mit marker closest to the peak LOD score was used to determine genotype of the BSB mice. BSB mice were then grouped by genotype and percentage of body fat plotted. S stands for mice heterozygous for Mus spretus and C57BL/6J alleles; B represents mice homozygous for C57BL/6J alleles.
[View Larger Version of this Image (66K GIF file)]


Fig. 6. (A) Effect of the locus on distal chromosome 7 in the B10.129(5M)/nSn and B10.C(41N)/Sn congenics (modified from Warden et al. 1995). Total plasma cholesterol, percentage of body fat, retroperitoneal fat pad weight and body weight are given for the congenic as a percentage of the C57BL/10SnJ background strain. All animals were fed a standard laboratory diet and were between 135 and 175 d old. (B) Molecular mapping of chromosomal breakpoints showed that the B10.129(5M)/nSn and C57BL/10SnJ congenics were essentially identical (modified from Warden et al. 1995).
[View Larger Version of this Image (25K GIF file)]

Beyond QTL mapping. The problem with QTL mapping studies is that each locus identified must be isolated in a congenic strain, essentially making it into a monogenic model, so as to further characterize the gene. A congenic mouse strain is genetically identical to a background strain, except for a small chromosomal region derived from a donor strain, and is created by a regimen of crossing and selection that places a gene from donor genetic sources onto a standard inbred-strain background (Bailey 1975, Graff and Snell 1968). Thus, comparison of a phenotype of a congenic strain with the phenotype of its background strain allows study of the effects of single genes derived from the donor strain, isolated from the effects of other donor strain genes. Congenic strains can be used to isolate individual underlying genes even for very complex traits. The isolation of more than 40 minor histocompatability genes (Bailey 1975, Graff and Snell 1968) and the recent production of congenic mouse strains isolating epilepsy QTL (Frankel et al. 1995a), nonobese diabetic-derived diabetogenic genetic intervals (Yui et al. 1996) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-susceptibility genes (Morel et al. 1996) demonstrate the feasibility of using congenic strains to dissect the complex pathogenic mechanisms of polygenic disease.

We reasoned that the genetic variations influencing obesity in BSB mice may be relatively common because many inbred strains of laboratory mice vary in body fat content (West et al. 1992). Chromosome 7 is the site of several histocompatibility genes that have been isolated in several congenic strains with two different donor strains, 129/SnJ and BALB/cByJ, on two different background strains, C57BL/6ByJ and C57BL/10SnJ. Two of these congenic strains, B10.129(5M)/nSn and B10.C(41N)/Sn, contain a region of chromosome 7 that includes the QTL identified in BSB mice. The two congenic strains differ from the background C57BL/10SnJ strain in several parameters related to obesity (Fig. 7A). Compared with strain C57BL/10SnJ mice, the two congenic strains exhibited only ~25% of the retroperitoneal fat pad weight and ~60 % of the body fat. Total body weight and plasma HL activity were decreased, and total cholesterol was increased in the B10.129(5M)/nSn congenic strain. Thus, the characteristics of the locus isolated in these congenic strains are strikingly similar to those of the chromosome 7 locus identified in BSB mice. We mapped the breakpoints between the background strain-derived and donor strain-derived chromosomes. Both congenic strains contain between 27 and 29 cM of donor strain DNA on chromosome 7 (Fig. 7B).


Fig. 7. Chromosomal locations of obesity quantitative trait loci (QTL) and positional candidate genes in mice (modified from Warden and Fisler 1997). Mob1, Mob2, Mob3 and Mob4 are QTL derived for spontaneous obesity in BSB mice (Warden et al. 1995), and the Mob5 is the QTL for diet-induced obesity in NZB/BINJ × Sm F2 mice (Lembertas et al. 1997). Do1, Do2 and Do3 are the QTL identified in the AKR × SWR cross (West et al. 1994a and 1994b).
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]

We generated a small cross of the B10.129(5M)/nSn congenic with the C57BL/10SnJ background strain to test its suitability for fine mapping and to test the observed difference in obesity between the congenic and background strains. Sixty F2 mice have been partially phenotyped and genotyped. We observed ~1.6-fold variation in BMI and 76-fold variation in retroperitoneal fat pad weight among the F2 progeny. Examination of the retroperitoneal fat pad/BMI ratio in 32 male F2 mice suggests that segregation of the phenotype may be sufficient to allow fine mapping that will further narrow the QTL region. In addition, subcongenic strains that break the congenic region into smaller segments can be generated from this cross. A subcongenic that differs from the background strain will contain the gene of interest, whereas a subcongenic that does not differ from background will be eliminated from further consideration. This procedure, although laborious, proved successful in fine mapping in several studies (Frankel et al. 1995a, Yui et al. 1996).

Once the QTL has been narrowed to just a few centimorgans, an examination of candidate genes within that region is the next step in identifying the gene. An example of this positional candidate approach applied to a monogenic mutation is the description of Cpefat causing the obesity of the fat mouse. Genetic mapping showed that the obese phenotype had a chromosomal position co-incident with the gene Cpe, coding for carboxypeptidase E, which is involved in prohormone (particularly proinsulin) processing (Naggert et al. 1995). Cpe of Cpefat mice is also defective in pituitary in brain, suggesting that obesity may develop as a result of defective prohormone processing for neuroendocrine hormones (Naggert et al. 1995).

Several candidate genes have been identified within the confidence limits of the QTL on chromosome 7 including Ucp2 (uncoupling protein-2) (Fleury et al. 1997), Snrpn (Leff et al. 1992), Igf1r (Hochberg et al. 1992), tub (Coleman and Eicher 1990, Kleyn et al. 1996, Noben-Trauth et al. 1996), Stp (phenol preferring sulfotransferase), Ins2 (the second mouse insulin locus) (Jones et al. 1992) and Igf2 (the locus for insulin-like growth factor 2). Mapping of the donor strain chromosomal region of the B10.129(5M)/nSn congenic strain showed that it contains several of these candidate genes, including Ucp2, Snrpn, Igf1r and tub (Fig. 7B) but excludes Stp, Ins2 and Igf2. A summary of obesity QTL and candidate genes is provided in Figure 7 to simplify identification of positional candidates that are co-incident with existing and future QTL.


FOOTNOTES

1   Presented as part of a symposium Obesity: Common Symptom of Diverse Gene-base Metabolic Dysregulations, Little Rock, Arkansas, March 4, 1997. This conference was co-sponsored by the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and the National Center for Toxicological Research/Food and Drug Administration and was supported by generous grants from The Jane B. Mendel Family Trust, Amgen, Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Division of American Home Products, and The Governor Winthrop Rockefeller Memorial Lecture Series-University of Arkansas. Guest editor for this symposium was George L. Wolff, Division of Biochemical Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research/FDA, Jefferson, AR 72079.
2   To whom correspondence should be addressed at 2023 East Sim's Way, Suite 245, Port Townsend, WA 98368.
3   Abbreviations used: HL, hepatic lipase; LOD, log-of-the-odds; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; QTL, quantitative trait locus; RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphisms; SSR, simple sequence repeats.


LITERATURE CITED


0022-3166/97 $3.00 ©1997 American Society for Nutritional Sciences
[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fisler, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Warden, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fisler, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Warden, C. H.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]