Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Innis, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lien, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Innis, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lien, E. L.

The Journal of Nutrition Vol. 127 No. 7 July 1997, pp. 1362-1370
Copyright ©1997 by the American Society for Nutritional Sciences

Formula Containing Randomized Fats with Palmitic Acid (16:0) in the 2-Position Increases 16:0 in the 2-Position of Plasma and Chylomicron Triglycerides in Formula-Fed Piglets to Levels Approaching Those of Piglets Fed Sow's Milk1

Sheila M. Innis2, Roger A. Dyer, and Eric L. Lien*

Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4 Canada and * Wyeth Nutrition International, Nutritional Research Department, Philadelphia, PA 19101

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
LITERATURE CITED


ABSTRACT

Human and pig milk fat contains a high proportion of palmitic acid (16:0) which is largely esterified to the 2-position of the triglycerides. In contrast, the 16:0 in most nonmilk fats and in infant formulas is mainly esterified at the triglyceride 1,3 positions. Gastric and pancreatic lipases hydrolyze fatty acids from the dietary triglyceride 1- and 3-positions to produce unesterified fatty acids and 2-monoglycerides which are absorbed and re-esterified. In this study, we determined whether formula with chemically randomized oils, which equally distributes 16:0 among all the positions of triglycerides, influences growth or the distribution of fatty acids in plasma and liver lipid of formula-fed piglets compared with piglets fed formula with native oils or sow's milk. After feeding from birth to 18 d, piglets fed formula with palm olein randomized with canola oil (co-randomized) had higher weight gain per liter of formula intake and higher 16:0 in the chylomicron triglyceride 2-position than piglets fed formula with randomized or native palm olein oil blended with canola oil. The fatty acid distribution of formula triglycerides is an important determinant of pathways of 16:0 absorption, and consequently of plasma lipid fatty acids in formula-fed piglets.

KEY WORDS: co-randomized oils · infant formula · milk · triglycerides · palmitic acid · piglets


INTRODUCTION

The positional distribution, as well as the composition, of fatty acids in dietary triglycerides is an important determinant of fat digestion and absorption (Small 1991). Gastric and pancreatic lipases hydrolyze fatty acids from the 1,3 positions of dietary triglycerides to produce free fatty acids and 2-monoglycerides (Carriere et al. 1993, Small 1991). Human milk triglycerides contain about 20-25% palmitic acid (16:0), with over 70% of the 16:0 esterified to the sn-2 position of the milk triglyceride (Martin et al. 1993). In contrast, the 16:0 in vegetable and most nonmilk fats is predominately esterified at the 1,3 positions, and mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids are usually esterified at the 2-position of the triglyceride (Small 1991). As a result, the intraluminal hydrolysis of human milk by gastric and pancreatic lipases should result in formation of 2-monopalmitin, whereas hydrolysis of other dietary fats should produce unesterified 16:0.

Unesterified 16:0 is less well absorbed from the lumen than shorter chain saturated, or carbon chain 18 unsaturated fatty acids such as oleic acid (18:1) or linoleic acid [18:2(n-6)] (de Fouw et al. 1994, Filer et al. 1969, Jensen et al. 1986). This may be due at least in part to a melting point above body temperatures (>60°C) and a strong tendency of unesterified 16:0 to form insoluble soaps with divalent cations such as calcium and magnesium at the pH of the small intestine (Chappell et al. 1986, de Fouw et al. 1994, Filer et al. 1969, Jensen et al. 1986, Mattson and Volpenheim 1964, Tantibhedhyangkul and Hashim 1979). To avoid this, some infant formulas contain 8:0-14:0 (caprylic, caproic, lauric and myristic acids) from medium-chain triglycerides and/or coconut oil rather than 16:0 as the major source of saturated fatty acids. The specific positioning of 16:0 at the 2-position of human milk triglycerides has been suggested as one of the reasons for the high efficiency of absorption of fat from human milk (Filer et al. 1969, Tomarelli et al. 1968). Support for this has been provided by studies showing better absorption of total dietary fat or 16:0 by infants fed formula with 16:0 esterified to the 2 rather than the 1,3 positions of the dietary triglycerides (Carnielli et al. 1995b, Filer et al. 1969). This is still controversial, however, because of the postulated role of the milk enzyme bile salt-stimulated lipase in completing the hydrolysis of the milk triglycerides to glycerol and unesterified fatty acids (Bernbäck et al. 1990).

The 2-monoglyceride pathway is believed to account for about 80% of the triglycerides synthesized and secreted in chylomicrons following the absorption of dietary fat (Small 1991). Triglyceride synthesis via this pathway, rather than the 3-glycerophosphate pathway, results in formation of triglycerides with the same fatty acid in the 2-position as in the dietary fat (Myher et al. 1985). Thus, in the absence of complete hydrolysis by bile salt-stimulated lipase, the digestion and absorption of human milk fat should result in higher proportions of 16:0 in the 2-position of plasma triglycerides than should the digestion and absorption of infant formula with vegetable fats. Recent studies have provided evidence for this through the demonstration of higher proportions of 16:0 in the 2-position of plasma triglycerides in breast-fed infants than in infants fed formula containing similar amounts of 16:0, but predominately esterified to the triglyceride 1,3 positions (Innis et al. 1994). Similar differences occur between piglets fed sow's milk, which also has a high proportion of 16:0 in the 2-position of the milk triglyceride (Innis 1993, Parodi 1982), and piglets fed formula containing vegetable oils (Innis et al. 1995).

The physiological importance of dietary 16:0 or of its position in the plasma triglycerides of young infants is not well known. The well-known preferential portal-venous transport and rapid hepatic beta -oxidation of 8:0-12:0, compared with chylomicron triglyceride transport of 16:0 (Bach and Babayan 1982, Senior 1968), however, can reasonably be expected to result in differences in fatty acid metabolism between infants fed formula with 8:0-12:0 and breast-fed infants (Innis 1992). Further, the distribution of fatty acids in plasma triglycerides is known to influence the rate of hydrolysis by lipoprotein lipase and the composition of partial glycerides cleared by the liver (Mortimer et al. 1992, Nilsson et al. 1992, Small 1991). However, no information is available as yet to indicate whether the plasma triglyceride fatty acid distributions of young infants are important to fatty acid turnover or delivery to specific tissues.

The proportion of 16:0 esterified to the 2-position of dietary triglycerides can be increased by chemical randomization. This process involves release of fatty acids from their natural position followed by equal re-esterification among all three positions of the glycerol molecule. Whether formulas containing randomized fats can be used to support a distribution of fatty acids in plasma lipids similar to that found during milk feeding is not known. This study, therefore, determined if the feeding of formula with randomized fats can increase the proportion of 16:0 in the 2-position of chylomicron triglycerides and if increased absorption of saturated 2-monoglycerides is accompanied by changes in the composition of chylomicron or liver lipid fatty acids in formula-fed piglets. The small blood volumes available in studies with infants often limit analyses to measures of total plasma phospholipid, triglyceride and cholesteryl ester fatty acids. However, it is possible that chylomicron fatty acids, which should reflect the absorbed lipids, will differ from those of other plasma lipoproteins, e.g., VLDL or LDL. This study, therefore, also compared the fatty acid composition of triglycerides, phospholipids and cholesteryl esters in plasma with that in chylomicron.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Animals and formulas. Three fat blends were prepared using unmodified (native) canola and palm olein oils, native canola oil and randomized palm olein, or canola oil and palm olein oil randomized together (co-randomized), each with (v/v fat blend) 22% coconut oil and 13% soybean oil to provide 10:0, 12:0 and additional 18:2(n-6) and 18:3(n-3). The fat blends were used to prepare a ready-to-feed liquid formula as described by Atkinson et al. (1993) containing (% energy) about 45.5% fat, 14.1% protein and 40.4% carbohydrate. The composition of the formula and the sow's milk total fatty acids, and the percentage of each fatty acid in the 2-position, determined as described elsewhere (Innis 1993, Lien et al. 1993), are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Composition and positional distribution of fatty acids in formula and sow's milk1

[View Table]

Male piglets of birthweight >1 kg were obtained from Peter Hill Holdings, Langley, BC, Canada. The piglets were randomly assigned to one of the three formulas, six piglets each, and bottle-fed until d 18 after birth (Hrboticky et al. 1990). Passive immunity was provided by inclusion of colostrum-derived immunoglobulins (La Belle, Bellingham, WA) in the formulas for the first 72 h after birth. Piglets fed sow's milk (n = 6) were fed by their natural mothers and studied at a similar age and time after the last feed. Littermates were not assigned to the same diet group. All of the procedures involving the piglets were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the University of British Columbia and conformed with the guidelines of the Canadian Council on Animal Care.

Tissue preparation. At 18 d of age and 4 h after a feeding of 60 mL formula, the piglets were anesthetized with ketamine/rompun (37.5:3.75 mg/kg, MTC Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, ON, Canada Chemagro, Etobicoke, ON, Canada, respectively), by intramuscular injection. Blood samples were drawn by cardiac puncture into tubes containing 150 mg EDTA/L in 9 g NaCl/L) as the anticoagulant. Plasma was prepared by centrifugation 2000 × g for 15 min, and with the exception of aliquots for HDL cholesterol and chylomicron, the samples were frozen at -80°C. The liver was immediately removed, weighed, homogenized in ice-cold saline and stored at -80°C. Chylomicron were isolated at d < 1.006 kg/L by ultracentrifugation, 60 min at 140,000 × g using a Beckman model L5 ultracentrifuge and SW-28 rotor (Beckman Instruments, Palo Alto, CA).

Biochemical analyses. Plasma and liver total and free cholesterol, and triglycerides were determined with enzymatic kits (no. 225-26, 210-75, respectively, from Diagnostic Chemicals Charlottetown, PE, Canada). Esterified cholesterol was calculated as the difference between free and total cholesterol. HDL cholesterol was determined following precipitation of the apolipoprotein (apo) B-containing lipoproteins with heparin-manganese chloride (Gidez et al. 1982) within 6 h of blood collection. The amount of cholesterol associated with the apo B-containing lipoproteins was calculated as the difference between the total and HDL cholesterol.

Plasma, chylomicron and liver total lipids were extracted, and the triglycerides, phospholipids and cholesteryl esters separated by TLC (Hrboticky et al. 1990). The separated lipid fractions were recovered, and an aliquot of the triglyceride and phospholipid fractions was taken for analysis of the 2-position fatty acids; the fatty acid components in the remaining samples were converted to their respective methyl esters using methanoic HCl (1:5 v/v) 100°C × 5 min for phospholipids, and 14% boron trifloride in methanol/benzene/methanol (25:20:25, v/v/v) 100°C × 30 min or 45 min for triglyceride and cholesteryl esters, respectively. Enzymatic hydrolysis to determine the composition of the chylomicron triglyceride and phospholipid 2-position fatty acids used pig pancreatic lipase (EC 3.1.1.4) and phospholipase A2 (EC 3.1.1.3 Type 11) (both from Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO), respectively, as described by Kuksis (1984). Mono-heptadecanoic or heptadecanoic acid was added after the pancreatic lipase or phospholipase A2 enzyme reactions, respectively, as internal standards. The monoglyceride and free fatty acid and lysophospholipid and free fatty products were then separated by TLC using hexane/diethyl ether/acetic acid, 60:40:1.5 (v/v/v/) and chloroform/acetic acid/methanol/water, 75:25:5:2 (v/v/v/v), respectively. Parallel reactions without triglyceride or phospholipid substrate were always done to correct for any fatty acid components in the enzyme preparations. The completeness of the reactions was established in preliminary experiments and monitored throughout these studies from the amount of the substrate (triglyceride and diglyceride, or phospholipid) present after TLC separation of the reaction products. Fatty acid methyl esters were separated and quantified using a Varian 3400 gas liquid chromatograph equipped for analysis with capillary columns and a Varian Star data system (Varian Canada, Georgetown, ON, Canada) (Innis et al. 1994 and 1995). Milk fatty acids were determined following direct methylation of fatty acids (Lepage and Roy 1987) as in previous studies (Innis et al. 1994).

Statistical analysis. Results were compared among the three groups of formula-fed piglets and between groups of piglets fed formula and the group fed sow's milk using ANOVA. Formal tests for significant difference were made using Fisher's least significant difference and were performed only for ANOVA results with P < 0.05. The level of significance was set at P < 0.0125 for comparisons between piglets fed formula and piglets fed sow's milk, and at P < 0.008 for comparisons among the three groups of formula-fed piglets, equivalent to P = 0.05 with correction using the Bonferroni method for the number of comparisons with the data sets. All calculations were performed using the GLM procedure in the Number Cruncher Statistical System, version 5.01 (Kaysville, UT). Values given in the text are means ± SEM, n = 6.


RESULTS

Growth. There were no significant differences in body weight among the groups of 18-d-old piglets fed formula (4.5 ± 0.2, 4.9 ± 0.3 and 4.5 ± 0.2 kg for piglets fed the formula with native oils, randomized palm olein and canola oil, or co-randomized palm olein and canola oil, respectively). However, weight gain relative to formula intake from birth to 18 d was significantly higher in piglets fed the co-randomized palm olein and canola oil than in those fed the native oils or randomized palm olein with native canola oil, 0.214 ± 0.005, 0.192 ± 0.03 and 0.196 ± 0.010 kg gain/L formula, respectively.

Plasma lipids. The plasma total cholesterol and HDL cholesterol were significantly higher in piglets fed sow's milk (3.58 ± 0.17 and 1.48 ± 0.08 mmol/L, respectively), than in piglets fed the formula with native oils (2.31 ± 0.14 and 1.13 ± 0.62 mmol/L), randomized palm olein (2.35 ± 0.17 and 1.16 ± 0.11 mmol/L) or co-randomized palm olein and canola oil (2.52 ± 0.14 and 1.25 ± 0.08 mmol/L). The plasma triglyceride concentrations were not different among the groups fed milk and those fed the formula with native oils, randomized palm olein, or corandomized palm olein and canola oil (0.36 ± 0.07, 0.40 ± 0.08, 0.52 ± 0.21 and 0.46 ± 0.06 mmol/L, respectively).

Chylomicron lipid fatty acids. The piglets fed formula had significantly lower levels of 16:0, 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3), and higher 18:1, 18:2(n-6) and 18:3(n-3), but similar levels of 18:0 in chylomicron triglycerides compared with piglets fed sow's milk (Table 2). These differences reflect the lower 16:0, absence of 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3), higher 18:1, 18:2(n-6) and 18:3(n-3), and similar 18:0 in the formula compared with sow's milk (Table 1).

Table 2. Composition of the major total and position 2 fatty acids in chylomicron triglycerides of piglets fed formula with native or randomized oils, or sow's milk1

[View Table]

The chylomicron triglyceride percentage of 16:0 was significantly higher in piglets fed the formula with co-randomized palm olein and canola oil than in piglets fed the formula with randomized palm olein and native canola oil. The chylomicron triglyceride percentage of 22:6(n-3), on the other hand, was significantly lower in piglets fed the formula with the co-randomized rather than native oils. There were no other differences in the chylomicron triglyceride total fatty acid composition among the groups of formula-fed piglets.

The differences in the chylomicron triglyceride 2-position fatty acids between the formula and milk-fed piglets and among the groups of formula-fed piglets were much larger than in the chylomicron triglyceride total fatty acids (Table 2). Palmitic acid (16:0) represented 39.5 ± 2.1% of the chylomicron triglyceride 2-position fatty acids of piglets fed sow's milk, a value significantly higher than in any of the formula-fed piglets (Table 2). The piglets fed sow's milk also had significantly lower 18:0, 18:1, 18:2(n-6) and 18:3(n-3), but higher 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) in chylomicron triglyceride 2-position fatty acids than the piglets fed formula. These differences in enrichment of 16:0, 18:0, 18:1, 18:2(n-6), 18:3(n-3), 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) in the chylomicron triglyceride 2-position fatty acids between the milk- and formula-fed piglets are reasonably explained by differences in the distribution of these fatty acids in the 2-position of milk and formula triglycerides. For example, 18:0, which is not well absorbed from the intestinal lumen as an unesterified fatty acid (Jensen et al. 1986), is esterified mainly at the 1-position; 18:1, 18:2(n-6) and 18:3(n-3) are predominantly esterified at the 1- and 3-positions; and 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) (which was absent in the formula) are equally distributed between the 2- and 3-positions of milk triglycerides (Martin et al. 1993).

Feeding the formula with randomized palm olein oil, or co-randomized palm olein and canola oil resulted in significant changes in the piglet chylomicron triglyceride 2-position enrichment of 16:0, as well as 18:0, 18:2(n-6), 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) compared with the formula with native oils (Table 2). The piglet chylomicron triglyceride 2-position percentages of 16:0 and 18:0 were significantly higher in the groups in the following order: co-randomized palm olein and canola oils > randomized palm olein and native canola oil > native palm olein and canola oil. The percentages of 18:2(n-6), 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3), on the other hand, decreased in the groups in the same order.

Differences in the major fatty acids in the chylomicron phospholipids among piglets fed the different diets were relatively small, particularly when compared with the differences in the triglycerides (Table 2, 3). The piglets fed formula had significantly lower levels of 16:0, 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3), higher 18:1, 18:2(n-6) and 18:3(n-3), but similar 18:0 in chylomicron phospholipids than the piglets fed sow's milk. These differences, which are similar to those in the chylomicron triglycerides, again reflect the differences in fatty acid composition of the milk and formula (Table 1). Of note, however, 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) were significantly lower, and 18:2(n-6) was higher in the plasma phospholipid total and, in particular, 2-position fatty acids of piglets fed the formula with co-randomized palm olein and canola oil than in piglets fed the other formula (Table 3). The levels of saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids in the chylomicron phospholipids, however, were not significantly different among piglets fed the different formulas.

Table 3. Composition of the major total and position 2 fatty acids in chylomicron phospholipids of piglets fed formula with native or randomized oils, or sow's milk1

[View Table]

The chylomicron cholesteryl esters of the piglets fed formula had significantly lower levels of 16:0 and 20:4(n-6), and higher 18:1, 18:2(n-6) and 18:3(n-3) than those of the piglets fed sow's milk (Table 4). The chylomicron cholesteryl ester percentages of 18:0 and 18:1 were significantly lower in the piglets fed randomized palm olein oil than in piglets fed the formula with native oils or co-randomized palm olein and canola oil. In contrast to the chylomicron triglycerides and phospholipids, however, the cholesteryl ester percentage of 22:6(n-3) was not different between the piglets fed formula and piglets fed sow's milk, and no differences in the percentage of 20:4(n-6) or 22:6(n-3) were found among piglets fed the different formulas.

Table 4. Composition and distribution of major fatty acids in chylomicron cholesteryl esters of piglets fed formula with native or randomized oils, or sow's milk1

[View Table]

Liver lipid fatty acids. The composition and distribution of fatty acids in the formulas (Table 1) also influenced the composition of the piglet liver fatty acids (Table 5). The percentages of 18:0 and 18:1 in the liver triglycerides, 18:3(n-3) in phospholipids, and 18:2(n-6) and 18:3(n-3) in cholesteryl esters were significantly higher, whereas 22:6(n-3) in the triglycerides and 20:4(n-6) in phospholipids and cholesteryl esters were significantly lower in the piglets fed formula than in those fed sow's milk. The liver triglyceride percentages of 16:0 of piglets fed the formula with randomized palm olein oil and 18:3(n-3) in piglets fed the co-randomized palm olein and canola oil were significantly lower than in piglets fed the other formulas (Table 5). The fatty acid composition of the liver phospholipids and cholesteryl esters was not significantly altered by the distribution of fatty acids in the formula triglycerides.

Table 5. Composition of major fatty acids in liver lipid classes of piglets fed formula with native or randomized oils, or sow's milk1

[View Table]

Fatty acids in plasma compared with chylomicron lipids. Compared with plasma, the chylomicron triglycerides of piglets fed formula had significantly lower levels of 16:0 and 18:0 and higher 18:1 and 18:2(n-6) (Fig. 1). The piglets fed sow's milk, on the other hand, had similar levels of 16:0, 18:1 and 18:2(n-6) in their chylomicron and plasma triglycerides. The difference in 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) in plasma compared with chylomicron triglycerides also differed between the piglets fed milk and those fed formula. That is, piglets fed formula had higher levels of 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) in plasma than in chylomicron triglycerides. Probably, this reflects the absence of a dietary intake of 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) and synthesis of 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) from 18:2(n-6) and 18:3(n-3), respectively, in the liver of the formula-fed animals. This difference was not seen in piglets fed sow's milk. Presumably, this reflects absorption of the milk 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3).
Fig. 1. Comparison of the major fatty acids in the plasma and chylomicron triglycerides of piglets fed the formula with native palm olein and canola oil, randomized palm olein and native canola oil, or co-randomized palm olein and canola oil, or sow's milk. The results shown are means ± SEM, n = 6/group. The statistical significance, where P <=  0.05, of the difference between the plasma and chylomicrons is indicated above the bars.
[View Larger Version of this Image (36K GIF file)]

The composition of saturated, monounsaturated, (n-6) and (n-3) fatty acids in plasma compared with chylomicron phospholipids was very similar for the piglets fed sow's milk, except for a significantly higher percentage of 18:2(n-6) in plasma than in chylomicron phospholipids (Fig. 2). The piglets fed formula, in contrast, all had significantly higher levels of 16:0 in their plasma than in chylomicron phospholipids. In addition, the percentage of 18:1 was significantly higher and 22:6(n-3) was significantly lower in the plasma than in chylomicron phospholipids of piglets fed the formula with native oils. Piglets fed the formula with randomized palm olein oil also had a significantly lower percentage of 22:6(n-3) in their plasma than in chylomicron phospholipids. Piglets fed the formula with the co-randomized oils had significantly higher percentages of 18:0, 18:1 and 18:3(n-3) and a lower percentage of 18:2(n-6) in their plasma than in chylomicron cholesteryl esters (Fig. 3). The only difference between the plasma and chylomicron cholesteryl esters of piglets fed the formula with native or randomized palm olein, on the other hand, was a higher 18:1 or 22:6(n-3), respectively, in the chylomicron than in plasma.


Fig. 2. Comparison of the major fatty acids in the plasma and chylomicron phospholipids of piglets fed the formula with native palm olein and canola oil, randomized palm olein and native canola oil, or co-randomized palm olein and canola oil, or sow's milk. The results shown are means ± SEM, n = 6/group. The statistical significance, where P <=  0.05, of the difference between the plasma and chylomicrons is indicated above the bars.
[View Larger Version of this Image (38K GIF file)]


Fig. 3. Comparison of the major fatty acids in the plasma and chylomicron cholesteryl esters of piglets fed the formula with native palm olein and canola oil, randomized palm olein and native canola oil, or co-randomized palm olein and canola oil, or sow milk. The results shown are means ± SEM, n = 6/group. The statistical significance, where P <=  0.05, of the difference between the plasma and chylomicrons is indicated above the bars.
[View Larger Version of this Image (38K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

The physiological importance of the preferential positioning of 16:0 in human (as well as pig) milk triglycerides is not completely understood, but has been proposed to be important in facilitating fat absorption (Filer et al. 1969, Tomarelli et al. 1968). This hypothesis is based on the relatively poor absorption of unesterified 16:0 and better absorption of 16:0 when present at the 2-position of dietary triglycerides. The milk enzyme, bile salt-stimulated lipase, however, can complete the hydrolysis of milk triglycerides in vitro to glycerol and unesterified fatty acids (Bernbäck et al. 1990). The extent of hydrolysis of 16:0 from milk triglycerides by this enzyme in infants in vivo, however, is uncertain. Recent studies have reported a high proportion (about 27% fatty acids) of 16:0 esterified at the 2-position of the plasma triglycerides in breast-fed infants (Innis et al. 1994). This suggests that a considerable proportion of human milk 16:0 is absorbed as 2-monopalmitin. For this reason, studies on the effects of dietary oils that also result in absorption of 2-monopalmitin are clearly of interest.

Assuming no hydrolysis of the (60%) 16:0 in the 2-position of sow's milk triglycerides (Table 1) and 70-80% of intestinal cell triglyceride synthesis in the fed state via the 2-monoglyceride pathway (Small 1991, Yang and Kuksis 1991), 16:0 should represent 39-46% of fatty acids in the 2-position of the chylomicron triglycerides of piglets fed sow's milk. This theoretical value agrees closely with the results of this study to show 39.5 ± 2.09% 16:0 in fatty acids at the 2-position of chylomicron triglycerides from piglets fed sow's milk. This result offers strong evidence that, at least in piglets, milk lipases do not hydrolyze substantial amounts of 16:0 from the 2-position of the milk triglycerides. The high absorption of fat from human milk (Barnes et al. 1974) and relatively high amounts of 16:0 esterified to the 2-position of plasma triglycerides in breast-fed infants (Innis et al. 1994) suggest that 16:0 is also at least partly absorbed as 2-monopalmitin in human infants.

The limited volume of blood which can be drawn from young infants often restricts studies on plasma fatty acid transport to analysis on lipids extracted from total plasma (Carlson et al. 1991, Innis et al. 1994 and 1996) rather than on separated lipoproteins. These studies with piglets show that the presence and direction (higher or lower) of difference between the plasma and chylomicron fatty acid levels depends on whether milk or formula is fed. Differences in the fatty acid composition of piglet plasma and chylomicron phospholipids, which have been reported in several studies on (n-6) and (n-3) fatty acid requirements, however, were relatively small and inconsistent, at least in these milk- and formula-fed piglets. This suggests that although studies pertaining to the transport of absorbed fatty acids should consider separation and analysis of chylomicron lipids, the incorporation of fatty acids into phospholipids might be adequately addressed through analysis of total plasma phospholipids.

The studies described here found improved growth relative to formula intake, and higher levels of 16:0 in chylomicron triglyceride total and 2-position fatty acids of piglets fed a formula with co-randomized palm olein and canola oil rather than randomized or native palm olein blended with native canola oil. Because body weights were not different among the formula-fed groups, it seems possible that piglets fed the native and randomized palm olein formulas consumed more formula to satisfy their energy requirement than piglets fed the co-randomized formula. Whether this could result from differences in 16:0 absorption cannot be extrapolated from the results of this study. Some evidence for this suggestion, however, is available. Recent studies with rats have shown that the absorption of 16:0 is increased, as indicated by a reduced fecal excretion of 16:0, when a greater proportion of the dietary 16:0 is esterified at the triglyceride 2 rather than 1,3 positions (de Fouw et al. 1994, Lien et al. 1993). Further, studies conducted several decades ago found that triglyceride configuration, specifically the position of 16:0, is an important determinant of fat absorption in formula-fed infants (Filer et al. 1969). More recent studies have confirmed this and have shown that fecal 16:0 excretion is lower in premature infants fed formula with 16:0 predominantly esterified at the triglyceride 2-position rather than formula containing the usual oil sources of 16:0 (Carnielli et al. 1995b).

The study with piglets reported here also provides biochemical evidence to suggest that co-randomization of palm olein with an oil low in 16:0 improves 16:0 absorption. Piglets fed the formula with co-randomized palm olein and canola oil had higher proportions of 16:0 in chylomicron and liver triglycerides and, more specifically, higher amounts of 16:0 in the chylomicron triglyceride 2-position fatty acids than piglets fed similar amounts of 16:0 from randomized palm olein blended with native canola oil. The formulas containing co-randomized palm olein and canola oil and randomized palm olein oil with native canola oil had similar amounts of 16:0 in total (21.1%) and 2-position (about 30%) fatty acids. It is therefore reasonable to conclude that co-randomization of an oil high in 16:0 with an oil low in 16:0 leads to improved absorption of 2-monopalmitin. Similarly, studies in rats found improved absorption of dietary 16:0 when palm olein was co-randomized rather than blended with coconut oil (Lien et al. 1993). The improved absorption of 16:0 conferred by co-randomization has been suggested to result from differences in the amount of totally saturated triglycerides in the diets. In the rat studies, the amounts of tripalmitin and dipalmitoylstearoyl glycerol were about 44 and 40% lower, respectively, when palm olein was co-randomized with coconut oil rather than blended with coconut oil (Lien et al. 1993).

Previous studies found higher plasma and HDL cholesterol concentrations in piglets fed formula containing about 70% 16:0 in the triglyceride 2-position fatty acids than in piglets fed a formula with similar amounts of 16:0 but from the usual vegetable oils (Innis et al. 1993). In contrast, in the study reported here, no differences were found in plasma total or HDL cholesterol among piglets fed the formula with co-randomized, randomized or native palm olein oil. The randomized and co-randomized palm olein in the study here, however, had less (about 30%) 16:0 in the triglyceride 2-position fatty acids (Table 1). Further, the enzymatic catalysis used to prepare the synthesized triglycerides resulted in relatively little 16:0 in the triglyceride 1,3 positions (Innis et al. 1993). In contrast, the chemical randomization used to prepare the randomized and co-randomized oils resulted in equal redistribution of 16:0 among all three positions in the triglyceride. Differences in the effects of dietary triglyceride 16:0 distribution on plasma cholesterol in this compared with previous (Innis et al. 1995) studies could, therefore, be explained by the difference in enrichment of 16:0 at the triglyceride 2-position or in the amount of 16:0 remaining at the 1,3 positions. Recent studies with adult humans, however, found no effect on fasting serum lipoprotein cholesterol levels after feeding diets with 28% energy from fat with 66.9% 16:0 compared with 6.4% 16:0 in the triglyceride 2-position fatty acids (Zock et al. 1995). Human and pig milk and infant formula typically contain about 50% dietary energy as fat (Innis 1992). Possibly, both the dietary triglyceride quantity and distribution of 16:0 in dietary triglycerides are important in determining any effects of 16:0 on plasma cholesterol metabolism.

Usually 16:0 represents 20-30% of the plasma cholesteryl ester fatty acids of breast-fed infants (Innis et al. 1994) and piglets fed sow's milk (Innis et al. 1993, Table 4 of the present study). The origin of these saturated cholesteryl esters is not known. Previous studies found higher 16:0 in plasma cholesteryl ester fatty acids of piglets fed formula containing about 70% 16:0 in the triglyceride 2-position fatty acids than in piglets fed formula with 16:0 from the usual vegetable oils (Innis et al. 1993 and 1995). A recent study with premature infants (Carnielli et al. 1995a) also found higher plasma cholesteryl ester 16:0 in infants fed formula containing triglycerides with 58% rather than 4% 16:0 in the triglyceride 2-position fatty acids. In contrast, no differences in plasma or chylomicron cholesteryl ester 16:0 were found among piglets fed the randomized, co-randomized or native palm olein oils in the studies reported here. Whether the absence of any effect on cholesteryl ester 16:0 in this study is explained by the lower proportion of 16:0 in the 2-position and/or the relatively high proportion of 16:0 remaining in the 1,3 positions of the randomized and co-randomized oil triglycerides is not known.

Enrichment of 16:0 at the 2-position of dietary triglycerides involves redistribution of unsaturated fatty acids to the outer 1,3 positions. Because gastric and pancreatic lipases hydrolyze fatty acids from the triglyceride 1,3 positions, but not the 2-position, this has clear implications for the absorption of unsaturated fatty acids. It has been estimated that reassembly of triglycerides via the 2-monoglyceride pathway accounts for synthesis of about 70-80% of the triglycerides secreted in chylomicrons in the fed state. This pathway shows little specificity in the positioning of fatty acids at the 1- and 3-positions (Small 1991, Yang and Kuksis 1991). Synthesis of triglycerides via the 3-glycerol phosphate pathway, on the other hand, incurs the usual preferential positioning of unsaturated fatty acids at the 2-position of the glycerol. The results of the studies reported here provide the first evidence to show that as the percentage of 16:0 in the 2-position of the plasma chylomicron triglycerides increases, presumably due to increased absorption of 2-monopalmitin, the proportion of unsaturated fatty acids decreases. Of note, the higher absorption of 2-monopalmitin in piglets fed the formula with co-randomized palm olein and canola oils was accompanied by lower 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3), and higher 18:2(n-6), but not 16:0, in the chylomicron phospholipid total and 2-position fatty acids. These results suggest that the effect of dietary triglyceride structure on the chylomicron phospholipid 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) is explained by differences in the pathway of 18:2(n-6) absorption, i.e., as a monoglyceride or unesterified fatty acid, rather than a specific effect of 16:0. Little information is available on the origin of 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) incorporated into chylomicron phospholipids during the feeding of diets without 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3). Potential sources include 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) secreted in bile phospholipids, uptake of systemic fatty acids, or desaturation-elongation of dietary 18:2(n-6) and 18:3(n-3) by the intestinal cells. Potentially, a decrease in chylomicron phospholipid 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) could involve inhibition of 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3) synthesis, or competition by 18:2(n-6) for acylation.

In summary, the results of these studies found that co-randomization of a dietary oil high in 16:0 with an unsaturated oil resulted in improved weight gain relative to feed intake (equivalent to about 9%), and higher absorption of 16:0 as a 2-monoglyceride (by up to twofold) in formula-fed piglets compared with piglets fed formula with similar oils blended but not co-randomized together. Redistribution of saturated fatty acids in formula triglycerides, however, alters not only the pathway of saturated fatty acid absorption, but also those of the (n-6) and (n-3) fatty acids. Further studies to consider the possible physiological significance of absorption of dietary fatty acids as unesterfied fatty acids or monoglycerides on the plasma transport and subsequent metabolism of (n-6) and (n-3) fatty acids with diets, such as milk containing 20:4(n-6) and 22:6(n-3), would be useful.


FOOTNOTES

1   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
2   To whom correspondence should be addressed.

Manuscript received 13 September 1996. Initial reviews completed 19 November 1996. Revision accepted 7 March 1997.


LITERATURE CITED


0022-3166/97 $3.00 ©1997 American Society for Nutritional Sciences



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Poult. Sci.Home page
J. H. Kim, N.-J. Choi, H. G. Park, I. H. Kim, H. G. Lee, M. K. Song, K. Y. Whang, and Y. J. Kim
Utilization of Oil By-Product from the Purification Process of Conjugated Linoleic Acid as Feeding Supplements for the Accumulation of Conjugated Linoleic Acid in the Egg Yolk
Poult. Sci., January 1, 2008; 87(1): 64 - 70.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
W. W.K. Koo, E. M. Hockman, and M. Dow
Palm olein in the fat blend of infant formulas: effect on the intestinal absorption of calcium and fat, and bone mineralization.
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2006; 25(2): 117 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
W. W. K. Koo, M. Hammami, D. P. Margeson, C. Nwaesei, M. B. Montalto, and J. B. Lasekan
Reduced Bone Mineralization in Infants Fed Palm Olein-Containing Formula: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Prospective Trial
Pediatrics, May 1, 2003; 111(5): 1017 - 1023.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
L. Amate, A. Gil, and M. Ramirez
Dietary Long-Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids from Different Sources Affect Fat and Fatty Acid Excretions in Rats
J. Nutr., December 1, 2001; 131(12): 3216 - 3221.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. M Nelson and S. M Innis
Plasma lipoprotein fatty acids are altered by the positional distribution of fatty acids in infant formulatriacylglycerols and human milk
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 1999; 70(1): 62 - 69.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. M. Innis and R. A. Dyer
Dietary Canola Oil Alters Hematological Indices and Blood Lipids in Neonatal Piglets Fed Formula
J. Nutr., July 1, 1999; 129(7): 1261 - 1268.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
S. E. Nelson, J. A. Frantz, and E. E. Ziegler
Absorption of Fat and Calcium by Infants Fed a Milk-Based Formula Containing Palm Olein
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., August 1, 1998; 17(4): 327 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Innis, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lien, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Innis, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Lien, E. L.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]