Journal of Nutrition Animal Diets/Enrichment Products...

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blakely, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hendrich, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blakely, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hendrich, S.

The Journal of Nutrition Vol. 127 No. 5 May 1997, pp. 824S-825S
Copyright ©1997 by the American Society for Nutritional Sciences

Introduction1

Shirley R. Blakely2, Adrianne Rogers*, and Suzanne Hendrichdagger

U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC, * Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA and dagger  Iowa State University, Ames, IA

FOOTNOTES
LITERATURE CITED

Finding the optimal laboratory animal diet to sustain growth and longevity and yield reproducible experimental results is of critical importance in nutritional and toxicological research. Diet is of concern in toxicological and other research with rodents, because diet composition can affect the activity of xenobiotic test substances and alter the outcome and reproducibility of long-term studies. For example, diets can alter the metabolism of test substances, which can result in errors of interpretation of data.

Nutritionally complete natural ingredient diets, either the closed formula commercial diets or the open formula NIH-07 diet, and purified diets, such as the AIN-76A diet, are most commonly used in nutritional and toxicological studies (Rutten and DeGroot 1992). Evaluation of the carcinogenic potential of xenobiotic compounds can differ depending on the diet fed. In general, higher tumor incidences have been reported in rodents fed the AIN-76A or other purified diets compared with rodents fed natural ingredient diets (Cohen et al. 1997, Fullerton et al. 1992). All diets should be formulated on the basis of current knowledge of nutritional requirements for the laboratory animals as recently published by the National Research Council (1995).

The high batch-to-batch variability in the types and quantities of nutrient and non-nutrient components in the natural ingredient diets can increase the variability and reduce the reproducibility of experimental results (Rao 1988). Unrefined materials in the natural ingredient diet, such as corn, soybean meal, fish meal, wheat and oats, may contain pesticide and mycotoxin contaminants (Merrill et al. 1997). Purified diets overcome some of these limitations because they are formulated with defined quantities of highly refined ingredients. This results in higher batch-to-batch reproducibility and minimizes chemical contaminants (Rao 1988). However, there may be important components in natural ingredient diets that are not present in purified diets, or the balance of components in purified diets may not be ideal (Jackson et al. 1997). Much uncertainty surrounds the use of purified diets in long-term studies, in part because the protein levels of laboratory animal diets are 20-25% (by weight), which are adequate for growth and reproduction but are too high for long-term maintenance.

New diets are being developed to provide better outcomes in long-term studies. The new AIN-93M purified diet contains a different source and lower level of protein than the AIN-76A diet and is designed for long-term maintenance (Reeves 1997). The new National Toxicology Program natural ingredient diet (NTP2000) contains less protein than the NIH-07 diet and yields increased survivorship in rodent bioassays (Rao 1997). The term survivorship is defined as the proportion of animals surviving until the end of chronic studies and is based upon toxicological guidelines that require 50% survival of rats until 24 mo of age as a requirement for a valid negative carcinogenic bioassay (Food and Drug Administration 1982). Declining survivorship of the three strains of rodents most commonly employed in toxicity testing, Fisher 344 rats, Sprague-Dawley rats and B6C3F1 mice, has led some scientists to speculate that the future of risk assessment is threatened (Abelson 1995).

Overfeeding, excessive weight gain and increased spontaneous disease are cited as causes of this decreased longevity. Permitting laboratory animals to feed ad libitum may result in overfeeding. Rather than change the macronutrient composition of the diet, some researchers restrict the amount of diet fed by 10-40% of that consumed by ad libitum-fed animals. Numerous studies have shown that moderate to severe restriction (20-40%) can increase survivorship and change the metabolism of toxicants. Two reports in this supplement address this issue (Keenan et al. 1997, McDonald 1997).

The Nutrition and Food Toxicology Research Interest Section (NFT-RIS) of the American Society for Nutrition Sciences presents this supplement on animal diets. Of the numerous appropriate and relevant topics considered, the NFT-RIS chose animal diets for long-term nutritional and toxicological studies because of the broad applicability to practically all research involving rodents. Three underlying themes were the focus of the symposium: 1) the design of diets for chronic rodent studies, 2) the influence of diet on carcinogenesis studies, and 3) the determination of the correct level and balance of nutrients and essential non-nutrient components. The objectives were to define the broad issues related to designing diets for long-term studies, to identify problems and solutions associated with using both types of diets, and to examine innovative approaches to diet formulation that have been successfully used by researchers. There is a need for continued vigilance and research on animal diets used for long-term nutritional and toxicological studies. Such efforts will serve as reminders of the critical influences diet can have on research results and ensure continued advances toward finding the optimal diet.


FOOTNOTES

1   Presented as part of the symposium "Animal Diets for Nutritional and Toxicological Research" given at Experimental Biology 96, April 15, 1996, Washington, DC. This symposium was sponsored by the American Society of Nutritional Sciences. Guest editor for the symposium publication was Shirley Blakely, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC.
2   To whom correspondence should be addressed.


LITERATURE CITED


0022-3166/97 $3.00 ©1997 American Society for Nutritional Sciences
[Medline]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blakely, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hendrich, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Blakely, S. R.
Right arrow Articles by Hendrich, S.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]