Journal of Nutrition LabDiet, Your World of Nutritional Answers

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamath, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sangiah, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamath, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sangiah, S.

The Journal of Nutrition Vol. 127 No. 3 March 1997, pp. 478-482
Copyright ©1997 by the American Society for Nutritional Sciences

Absorption, Retention and Urinary Excretion of Chromium-51 in Rats Pretreated with Indomethacin and Dosed with Dimethylprostaglandin E2, Misoprostol or Prostacyclin1,2,3

Surekha M. Kamath, Barbara J. Stoecker4, Melissa L. Davis-Whitenack, Marlo M. Smith, Bernice O. Adeleye5, and Subbiah Sangiah*

Department of Nutritional Sciences, and * Department of Physiological Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK 74078-6141

ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
FOOTNOTES
LITERATURE CITED


ABSTRACT

Drug-nutrient interactions affecting chromium were investigated in this study. Rats were injected with indomethacin to reduce endogenous prostaglandin synthesis and dosed with prostaglandin analogues or prostacyclin. Effects on absorption, tissue distribution and urinary excretion of 51Cr from 51CrCl3 were evaluated using a 2 × 4 factorial experimental design. Forty-eight adult male rats were food deprived for 12 h and then injected intraperitoneally with indomethacin (5 mg/kg body wt) or placebo. Thirty minutes later, rats were intubated and dosed with one of four treatments: a prostaglandin E1 analogue (misoprostol) at 50 µg/kg body wt; a prostaglandin E2 analogue (16,16-dimethylprostaglandin E2) at 7.5 µg/kg body wt; prostacyclin at 20 µg/kg body wt; or control (7.64 mmol/L Tween-80 suspended in 0.15 mol/L NaCl containing 0.48 mol/L ethanol). Immediately after intubation, rats were dosed with 3.7 mBq of 51CrCl3 by micropipette. Blood was collected from the tail at intervals after 51Cr dosing. Six hours after dosing, 51Cr rats were exsanguinated by cardiac puncture. Indomethacin, an inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis, significantly increased (P < 0.05) 51Cr in blood at all time periods tested except at 15 min. In tissues, indomethacin significantly increased 51Cr retention. Urinary 51Cr excretion at 6 h was higher (P < 0.05) in indomethacin-pretreated rats than in control rats. Administration of indomethacin, which blocks prostaglandin synthesis, enhanced 51Cr absorption, whereas dosing with 16,16-dimethylprostaglandin E2 decreased 51Cr absorption.

Key words: chromium, indomethacin, prostaglandins, drug-nutrient interactions, rats.


INTRODUCTION

Chromium is an essential trace mineral required for carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in rats as well as humans (Mertz 1993). In the United States, chromium content of many self-selected diets is less than 50 µg/d (Anderson and Kozlovsky 1985). Some elderly persons may be at risk of chromium depletion because of decreased food intake due to decreased energy needs and reduced access to a variety of foods (Nordstrom 1982) as well as their altered metabolism due to aging (Nordstrom 1982, Offenbacher 1992).

Drug-nutrient interactions are another concern for elderly persons. Because of the extensive use of over-the-counter as well as prescribed medications, the elderly are particularly at risk for drug-nutrient interactions (Roe 1986). Davis et al. (1995) showed that antacids reduced 51Cr absorption in rats. In elderly patients, mineral depletion may be the most common example of drug-induced nutritional deficiencies (Roe 1986). Because mechanisms of chromium absorption and metabolism have not been clarified, there is concern regarding impaired chromium status with the use of over-the-counter drugs.

On the other hand, Davis et al. (1995) showed that aspirin, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)6 and prostaglandin inhibitor, markedly enhanced absorption, tissue retention and urinary excretion of 51Cr. Aspirin and indomethacin, another NSAID, are used commonly by elderly persons in the treatment of arthritis.

The gastrointestinal mucosa produces a relatively large quantity of prostaglandins, which affect a number of gastric as well as intestinal functions (Robert 1979). Both indomethacin and aspirin dose-dependently inhibit prostaglandin synthesis and induce gastrointestinal mucosal damage, including ulcers in experimental animals (Kauffman 1989, Miller 1983, Rainsford and Willis 1982, Takeuchi et al. 1986c) and humans (Johansson et al. 1980, Redfern et al. 1987). Gastrointestinal prostaglandins, including prostacyclin (PGI2), dimethylprostaglandin E2 (dmPGE2) and misoprostol, protect the gastrointestinal mucosa against NSAID-induced mucosal damage (Balint and Varro 1989, Brand et al. 1985, Graham et al. 1988, Leung et al. 1989, Nylander et al. 1995, Robert 1979, Robert et al. 1968). The mechanism by which prostaglandins protect gastrointestinal mucosa is still not fully understood, but inhibition of cyclooxygenase activity reduces mucus and bicarbonate secretion (Kauffman 1989, Takeuchi et al. 1986c) and gastrointestinal cytoprotection (Miller 1983).

The effects of prostaglandins on mineral metabolism have not been studied extensively, but some researchers suggest that prostaglandins have a role in the absorption of minerals such as zinc (Song and Adham 1978, 1979), calcium (Johansson et al. 1980) and chromium (Davis et al. 1995). Song and Adham (1979) noted that indomethacin-injected rats had less 65Zn (from a duodenal dose) in their internal organs than did controls. Johansson et al. (1980) reported that when indomethacin was used three times daily at 25- or 50-mg doses in the treatment of rheumatic diseases, a significant reduction in serum calcium was found. Their results suggest that prostaglandins may have a role in calcium homeostasis in humans.

For chromium, Davis et al. (1995) showed that absorption, tissue retention and urinary excretion of 51Cr were significantly higher in animals dosed orally with aspirin than in control animals. They suggested that aspirin, a NSAID, inhibited endogenous prostaglandin synthesis and enhanced chromium absorption. Effects of gastrointestinal prostaglandins on chromium have not been studied.

One objective of the present study was to inhibit the synthesis of endogenous gastrointestinal prostaglandins and measure 51Cr absorption, tissue distribution and urinary excretion. A second objective was to evaluate the effects of supplemental prostaglandin analogues or PGI2 on 51Cr.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-eight male Sprague Dawley rats (Sasco, Omaha, NE) were fed an AIN-93G semipurified diet (Reeves et al. 1993) with no dietary variables for an average of 3 wk. Rats weighed 188 ± 3 g at the end of the maintenance period. Food was withheld from the rats for 12 h before the experiment, but they had free access to distilled drinking water during that period. The rats were randomly assigned to eight groups in a 2 × 4 factorial design. The study protocol was approved by the Oklahoma State University Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee.
Fig. 1. Chromium-51 in blood of rats injected intraperitoneally with indomethacin (5 mg/kg body wt) or placebo 30 min before an oral dose of 51CrCl3 (n = 24). Data represent the 6 h following the oral dose of 51Cr and are expressed as a percentage of the 51Cr dose, assuming blood is 7% of body weight. Overall significance of repeated measures of blood from 30 min to 6 h = 0.0003.
[View Larger Version of this Image (20K GIF file)]


Fig. 2. Chromium-51 in blood of rats following an oral dose of 51CrCl3. Rats were intubated and dosed with control, misoprostol (a PGE1 analogue), dimethylprostaglandin E2 (dmPGE2) or prostacyclin (PGI2) immediately prior to the 51Cr dose (n = 12). Data represent the 6 h following the 51Cr dose and are expressed as a percentage of the 51Cr dose, assuming blood is 7% of body weight. Lines not sharing a letter are significantly different overall from one another based on repeated measures of blood from 30 min to 6 h (P < 0.05).
[View Larger Version of this Image (22K GIF file)]

Twenty-four rats were injected intraperitoneally with 5 mg indomethacin/kg body wt suspended in 0.15 mol/L saline containing 3.82 mmol/L Tween-80; the other 24 rats were injected with the same volume of 0.15 mol/L saline containing 3.82 mmol/L Tween-80 without indomethacin (placebo). Thirty minutes later, the rats were intubated and dosed with one of four different treatments: control (7.64 mmol/L Tween-80 suspended in 0.48 mol/L ethanol and 0.15 mol/L NaCl used for the other drugs), 50 µg/kg body wt of misoprostol [a prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) analogue], 7.5 µg/kg body wt of 16,16-dmPGE2 [a prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) analogue] or 20 µg/kg body wt of PGI2. Immediately after intubation, the rats were given an oral dose of 3.7 mBq of 51CrCl3 (0.18 µg of chromium in 50 µL of 0.02 mol/L HCl) by micropipette.

Drug preparation. Indomethacin for intraperitoneal injection was prepared by adding 20 mg of indomethacin to 4.0 mL of 0.15 mol/L NaCl containing 3.82 mmol/L Tween-80. Rats were then injected with the indomethacin (5 mg/kg body wt). Preparation of the vehicle (placebo) was identical except no indomethacin was added.

The principal diluent for all intubated drugs was a suspension of 7.64 mol/L Tween-80 in 0.15 mmol/L NaCl. Ethanol concentrations were kept below 0.48 mol/L for all drugs but varied somewhat due to differences in solubility. The control was prepared by adding 0.48 mol/L ethanol to the 7.64 mmol/L Tween-80 suspension in 0.15 mol/L NaCl used for the other drugs.

Misoprostol was prepared for dosing by adding 20 mL of ethanol to 100 µg of ground tablet and diluting in 0.15 mol/L NaCl containing 7.64 mmol/L Tween-80. Rats were given 50 µg misoprostol/kg body wt by gastric intubation.

The dmPGE2 was received as 1 mg in 100 µL of methyl acetate and was diluted with 100 µL of 95% ethanol. Immediately before gastric intubation, the dmPGE2 was diluted to a final concentration of 1.5 mg/L in 0.15 mol/L NaCl containing 7.64 mmol/L Tween-80. Rats were intubated with 7.5 µg dmPGE2/kg body wt.

Prostacyclin was prepared for dosing by adding 200 µL of 95% ethanol to 1 mg of PGI2. The PGI2 was diluted to a final concentration of 10 mg/L in 7.64 mmol Tween-80 in 0.15 mol/L NaCl. Rats were intubated with 20 µg PGI2/kg body wt.

Experimental procedure. After dosing with 51Cr, the rats were placed in individual metabolic cages for urine collection. Urine samples were collected at 2, 4 and 6 h. Approximately 0.2 mL of blood was collected from the tail at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 h after 51Cr dosing. Six hours after dosing, the rats were anesthetized with ketamine (30 mg/kg body wt) and xylazine (2.2 mg/kg body wt). The rats were exsanguinated by cardiac puncture, and blood samples were collected. Urine, blood and tissues (liver, kidney, spleen, heart, lung, testes, pancreas and bone) were sampled and counted in the gamma counter to assess 51Cr absorption, retention and urinary excretion.

Table 1. Tissue 51Cr after pretreatment with indomethacin or placebo, at 6 h after dosing with control, misoprostol, dimethylprostaglandin E2 (dmPGE2) or prostacyclin (PGI2) in rats1

[View Table]

Calculation of total 51Cr in blood was performed assuming blood was 7% of body weight (Harkness and Wagner 1983). Data are expressed as a percentage of the intubated chromium dose. Samples of the dose were counted each day with tissue samples to allow correction for decay of the 51Cr.

Statistical analyses. Data were analyzed as a 2 × 4 factorial experiment (Cochran and Cox 1957) using SAS software (SAS/STAT, version 6, SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Square root transformations were performed on the data to correct for non-homogeneity of variance (Cochran and Cox 1957). The general linear model procedure in SAS was used for analysis of variance of the transformed tissue and urine data. A repeated measures analysis was performed on the transformed blood data (Cochran and Cox 1957). Differences among means were identified using the least significant difference test (Kirk 1982) and were considered significant at P < 0.05. 


RESULTS

Blood data were analyzed beginning at 30 min because of variable absorption at 15 min. No statistical interactions were found between the drugs and indomethacin. Therefore, their effects on the absorption, tissue distribution and urinary excretion of 51Cr are discussed separately. Overall, rats pretreated with indomethacin, a blocker of prostaglandin synthesis, had significantly higher (P < 0.0003) total 51Cr in blood than the placebo group (Fig. 1).

The control group had higher 51Cr absorption into blood than the groups that received misoprostol (P < 0.03) or dmPGE2 (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2). The value for the group dosed with dmPGE2 was lower (P < 0.03) than for all other treatment groups.

In tissues of indomethacin-pretreated rats, retention of 51Cr was greater (P < 0.03) in all tissues except lung, compared with the placebo group, which was not pretreated with indomethacin (Table 1). Most of the 51Cr retained in tissues was in liver and kidney.

When drugs were compared, retention of 51Cr was reduced significantly (P < 0.05) by dmPGE2 compared with all other groups in liver, kidney, spleen, testes and bone (Table 1). Tissue retentions in control, misoprostol- and PGI2-treated groups were not significantly different. In heart, 51Cr retention in the dmPGE2-treated group was significantly lower than in the control and misoprostol groups but not lower than in the PGI2-treated group. In the lung and pancreas, 51Cr retention was not significantly affected by the administered prostaglandin analogues or by prostacyclin.

The total cumulative urinary excretion of 51Cr was higher (P < 0.05) in indomethacin-treated than in placebo-treated rats (0.44 vs. 0.21% of 51Cr dose). Urinary excretion of 51Cr at 4 h tended to be higher (P < 0.06) in indomethacin-treated rats. The significance level for the effect of drugs on urinary excretion of 51Cr was 0.09. The group treated with dmPGE2 tended (P < 0.09) to have lower urinary 51Cr excretion than all other groups (Fig. 3).


Fig. 3. Chromium-51 in urine from rats 6 h after an oral dose of 51CrCl3. Rats were intubated and dosed with control, misoprostol (a PGE1 analogue), dimethylprostaglandin E2 (dmPGE2) or prostacyclin (PGI2) immediately prior to the 51Cr dose, n = 12. Data are expressed as a percentage of the 51Cr dose. Effects of the intubated drugs tended to be significant (P < 0.09).
[View Larger Version of this Image (49K GIF file)]


DISCUSSION

In the present study, pretreatment of rats with 5 mg indomethacin/kg body wt significantly increased 51Cr absorption, tissue retention and urinary excretion. Indomethacin is a NSAID that inhibits cyclooxygenase activity, reduces prostaglandin production and increases intestinal permeability (Bjarnason et al. 1989, Nylander et al. 1995, Rainsford and Willis 1982). According to Takeuchi et al. (1986c), 5 mg/kg body wt of indomethacin reduced prostaglandins in the corpus mucosa by 80-90% for more than 4 h without producing visible gastric lesions. Acid-induced HCO-3 secretion was significantly decreased by subcutaneous administration of these doses of indomethacin (Takeuchi et al. 1986c). In addition, prostaglandins have cytoprotective properties independent of their effects on acid secretion (Miller 1983). The increased 51Cr absorption and tissue retention seen in the present study seem to be due to one or more of these effects of prostaglandin inhibition.

Some studies have shown that a variety of prostaglandins and analogues reduce gastrointestinal side effects associated with NSAID, including indomethacin, when taken together (Johansson et al. 1980). In the small bowel, increases in PGE2 generation were correlated with decreases in permeability (Gerstle et al. 1994, Nylander et al. 1995). In the present study, oral dosing with dmPGE2 significantly decreased 51Cr absorption, compared with control rats that received no exogenous prostaglandins or analogues. Other investigators found that administration of dmPGE2 (30 µg/kg) significantly increased HCO-3 output in rats dosed with 5 mg indomethacin/kg (Takeuchi et al. 1988). Likewise, dmPGE2 doses of 5 µg/kg (Leung et al. 1989) and 10-30 µg/kg (Takeuchi et al. 1986b) increased mucosal alkaline secretion in rats. Takeuchi and co-workers (1986a) suggested that endogenous prostaglandins have a role in maintaining acid-neutralizing capacity in the duodenum. Because indomethacin not only restricts blood flow and inhibits formation of mucus but also leaves the surface exposed to acid, this acidic environment may further promote chromium absorption. Chromium is poorly absorbed from alkaline environments (Mertz 1969), which may contribute to the decreased absorption seen in this study with PGE2 administration. Increased cytoprotection by prostaglandins (Miller 1983) also may have reduced 51Cr absorption.

Misoprostol, a PGE1 analogue, inhibits gastric acid secretion in dogs at doses of 10-30 µg/kg (Dajani et al. 1976) and in humans (Brand et al. 1985). In the present study, 51Cr in blood following dosing with 50 µg/kg of misoprostol was significantly lower than in the control group but significantly higher than in the group dosed with 7.5 µg/kg body wt of dmPGE2. Rats dosed with PGI2 also had more 51Cr in blood than rats dosed with dmPGE2. Neither PGE1 analogue or PGI2 significantly affected urinary excretion or tissue concentrations of 51Cr. Thus at the doses used, dmPGE2 had the greatest inhibitory effect on 51Cr absorption and retention.

In summary, enhanced 51Cr absorption seen with indomethacin pretreatment may be mediated by an increase in mucosal permeability, by the inhibition of gastrointestinal prostaglandin synthesis, or by the presence of a more acidic luminal environment. These results suggest that directly or indirectly prostaglandins may influence chromium absorption.


FOOTNOTES

1   Presented in part at Experimental Biology 95, April 9-13, 1995, Atlanta, GA [Kamath, S. M., Stoecker, B. J., Whitenack, M. D., Smith, M., Adeleye, B. O. & Sangiah, S. (1995) Indomethacin and prostaglandin E2 analogue effects on absorption, retention, and urinary excretion of 51chromium. FASEB J. 9:A577 (abs.)].
2   This research was supported by Oklahoma Center for the Advancement of Science and Technology grant no. HR3-059 and the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station, Hatch Project 2041. 
3   The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 USC section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
4   To whom correspondence should be addressed.
5   Current address: School of Human Resources, University of Southwestern Louisiana, Lafayette, LA 70504-0399.
6   Abbreviations used: dmPGE2, dimethylprostaglandin E2; NSAID, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug; PGE1, prostaglandin E1; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; PGI2, prostacyclin.

Manuscript received 11 March 1996. Initial reviews completed 21 May 1996. Revision accepted 9 September 1996.


LITERATURE CITED


0022-3166/97 $3.00 ©1997 American Society for Nutritional Sciences




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kamath, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sangiah, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kamath, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sangiah, S.


Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
Copyright © 1997 by American Society for Nutrition