![]() |
|
|

* Station de Recherches Avicoles, INRA, 37380 Nouzilly, France and
Laboratoire de Génétique Factorielle, INRA, 78352 Jouy-en-Josas, France
Energy balance of adult cockerels genetically selected for high (R+) or low (R
) residual feed consumption was investigated by using indirect calorimetry. Although no between-line difference was found in digestion of ingested energy, the true metabolizable energy (ME) intake was 40% greater in R+ than in R
birds. Basal heat production (HP) did not significantly differ between genotypes. Diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT) was significantly enhanced in R+ compared with R
birds, i.e., +84% when expressed as the difference in kilojoules of heat production determined in feed-deprived and fed cockerels, +31% when calculated as a percentage of ME intake (P < 0.01). The difference in DIT calculated from the regression between HP and physical activity explained 75% of the difference in HP; the remaining 25% could be explained by activity-related HP. The results cannot be explained by differences in the plasma concentration of circulating thyroid hormones: plasma thyroxine concentration did not differ between genotypes, whereas plasma triiodothyronine concentration was lower in feed-deprived R+ than in R
birds and indistinguishable in fed birds of the two lines. Heat production, however, was higher in the R+ line. Propranolol decreased HP only in the R+ line, suggesting a
-adrenergic control of DIT at least in cockerels of this line. Plasma triglyceride concentration was lower in the R+ than in the R
line in fed cockerels, and plasma nonesterified fatty acid concentration was higher in the R+ than in the R
line in feed-deprived cockerels. These results are consistent with the leanness of the R+ compared with the R
line. The R+ and R
lines constitute an original model of diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT), a process that is under genetic control of appetite and allows R+ birds to balance all of their excessive energy intake without any adipose tissue storage.
In animal production, two thirds of the total costs of meat, egg or milk production are due to feed expenses. The improvement of feed efficiency, i.e., the reduction of feed intake for a given level of production, has long been the main preoccupation of breeders and geneticists. In laying hens, an important part of the variation of feed consumption can be explained by the egg mass, body weight and its variation (Byerly et al. 1980
, Fairfull and Chambers 1984
). However, the remaining variation, referred to as residual feed intake or R criterion, may be used for direct selection of feed efficiency. The R is defined as the difference between the observed and the predicted feed intake. Two experimental lines have been divergently selected for high (R+)4 or low (R
) residual feed intake (RFC), (Bordas and Mérat 1984
, and Bordas et al. 1992
). The observed feed intake differs by 40% for males of the same body weight and by 20% for females of the same body weight and egg production after 14 generations of selection. The higher energy intake of R+ birds should be offset by the following: 1) a lower digestion of ingested energy; 2) an enhanced energy expenditure (basal metabolic rate, physical activity or heat increment of feed, which is the heat production due to the increase in metabolic rate after feed ingestion, also referred as the thermic effect of food or diet-induced thermogenesis); or 3) changes in body composition. Selection for RFC did not modify the digestive use of energy intake of either cockerels or hens (Gabarrou and Géraert 1994
, Géraert et al. 1991
). The body composition of the two lines differs but, surprisingly, R+ birds are leaner than R
birds (El Kazzi et al. 1995, Tixier et al. 1988
, Zein-El-Dein 1985). Using indirect calorimetry, Géraert et al. (1991)
and Gabarrou and Géraert (1994)
demonstrated that differences in energy intake were balanced by enhanced heat production (HP) in the R+ compared with the R
line. This difference in HP could result from an enhanced basal metabolic rate, physical activity or from diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT). When comparing White Leghorn hens of another RFC selection program, Luiting (1991)
demonstrated that high RFC hens produce more heat than low RFC hens partly because of enhanced activity expenditure (+30-50%). The remaining 50-70% suggests higher DIT in high, compared with low RFC hens.
This DIT may be divided into an obligatory component related to digestion, absorption and processing of nutrients and into a regulatory or facultative component (Jéquier 1985
). In rats, the hyperphagia induced by highly palatable diets is accompanied by a large increase in metabolic rate as a result of the regulatory DIT, which reduces weight gain and obesity. In mammals, this regulatory DIT allows body weight to be maintained in spite of a large increase in feed intake. DIT has been attributed mainly to sympathetic nervous stimulation of brown adipose tissue (BAT) thermogenesis after a meal (Rothwell and Stock 1979
). BAT is involved in cold-induced thermogenesis in rodents, but regulatory DIT has not yet been demonstrated in birds, which have no BAT (Saarela et al. 1989
). However, after prolonged cold exposure, ducklings exhibit nonshivering thermogenesis (NST) associated with loose-coupling of subsarcolemmal muscular mitochondria (Barré et al. 1985
).
This experiment was thus performed to investigate the energy balance of R+ and R
adult cockerels and in particular to clarify the origin of the difference in HP between the two lines by determining the basal metabolic rate, activity and DIT. The endocrinal and neuroendocrinological control of HP by thyroid hormones or by nervous sympathetic system was also investigated.
lines (Bordas et al. 1992|
Table 1. Diet composition |
); tube-feeding was not employed.
20°C until measurment of the triglyceride, uric acid, glucose, triiodothyronine and thyroxine concentrations.
). After an adaptation to tube-feeding for 3 d at 100% of their individual free feed intake, birds received on the fourth day either 60 or 100% of their individual free feed intake. Heat production was continuously monitored for 23 h/d.
cockerels were measured as described by Picard et al. (1992)
. Feeder weights (± 0.01 g) and duration of any access to feeders (± 0.1 s) were recorded 6 times per second. Cockerels were adapted for 2 wk to the experimental device and the feed intake was recorded during a 24-h period. A meal was defined as a period of continuous eating not interrupted by more than 120 s (Savory 1979
).
-antagonist that inhibits thermogenesis induced by
-adrenergic activity. Birds had free access to water. Heat production was continuously monitored for 23 h.
radar sensor was installed in each chamber to record activity. A constant climate was provided by a microprocessor controller (± 0.5°C; Digireg S48, Sfere, Lyon, France) coupled with a temperature probe (± 0.5°C; CS1B, TCSA, Bordeaux, France). A direct-drive fan recirculated air (100 m3/h) through a cooling/heating device (10-35°C). Condensates were discarded daily. Relative humidity was measured by a humidity probe (HMW30 UB/YB, Vaisala, Helsinki, Finland).
Table 2.
Body weight, feed intake, physical activity, energy balance, respiratory quotients, rectal and comb temperature of R+ and R
.
adult cockerels1 (Experiment 1)
). Heat production was measured continuously for 23 h (1 h was necessary for maintenance and calibration). Diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT) was estimated from the difference between heat production determined in feed-deprived and fed cockerels. Heat production in the inactive state was calculated by extrapolating the regression between heat production and physical activity to zero activity.
and Okabe et al. 1980
, respectively) by using the kits provided by BioMerieux SA (Charbonnières-les-Bains, France).
80°C until analysis. Deiodinase I activity was determined as described by Darras et al. (1992). The animal protocols were approved by the French Ministry of Agriculture.
birds (+40%), no difference between lines was observed for body weight or digestion of ingested energy (Table 2). The TMEi was thus higher in the R+ line (+40%). When birds were deprived of feed, heat production (HP) did not differ between lines, but HP measured in fed birds was significantly higher in the R+ line (+29%). Diet-induced thermogenesis (DIT), estimated as the difference between HP measured in feed-deprived or fed birds, was 84% higher in the R+ line. When expressed as a percentage of TMEi, DIT remained higher in the R+ line (27.5 %) than in the R
line (20.9%).
Table 3.
Regression equations between heat production (HP) and true metabolizable energy intake (TMEi) of R+ and R
line, whether birds were tube-fed (+31%) or had free access to feed (+43 %). The extrapolation to zero feed intake HP, b, which corresponds to the basal metabolic rate, did not differ between lines whether birds were tube-fed or had free access to feed. The slope of the regression between retained energy and TMEi, representing the ability to retain energy, was lower in the R+ line. Moreover, the retained energy extrapolated to zero feed intake, representing the total energy losses when unfed was higher in the R+ line.
cockerels1
Table 4.
Plasma triglyceride, uric acid, glucose, triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) concentrations in fed and unfed R+ and R
counterparts. Plasma T3 concentration did not differ in fed birds but was lower in feed-deprived R+ birds. T4 and hepatic deiodinase I activity did not differ between lines. Rectal temperature did not differ significantly between lines but comb temperature was higher in fed R+ than R
birds.
adult cockerels, and hepatic deiodinase I activity1
(Experiment 1)
Table 5.
Regression equations between heat production (HP) and physical activity (PA) of R+ and R
line when birds had free access to feed (Table 2). Tube-feeding drastically reduced activity, particularly in the R
line compared with the R+ line. The energetic cost of activity (the slope of regression, Table 5) was higher in the R
line whether birds were tube-fed (+11%) or had free access to feed (+33%). HP extrapolated to zero activity (Table 5) was higher in the R+ line whether birds were tube-fed (+19%) or had free access to feed (+29%). As a consequence, the total energetic cost of activity was slightly but not significantly higher in the R+ line, 244 vs. 211 kJ/(kg0.75·D), when cockerels had free access to feed. Tube feeding drastically reduced the total activity expenditure, which remained significantly higher in the R+ than in the R
line, 91 versus 48 kJ/(kg0.75·D).
cockerels1
birds, both lines spent the same amount of time eating (4.9 h/24 h) and consumed a similar number of meals (86 meals/24 h). R+ birds had higher (1.38 g) meal size (calculated as feed intake/number of meals) than R
birds (0.99g).
|
Table 6.
Feed intake pattern in R+ and R |
birds. DL-Propranolol (
-antagonist) decreased HP only in the R+ line (Table 7). When treated with DL-propranolol, R+ and R
birds did not differ in HP.
|
Table 7.
An oral dose of DL-propranolol (5 mg/kg) reduces heat production of R+ but not R |
cockerels was due mainly to a divergence in TME intake (40%). Basal metabolic rate, estimated from HP of feed-deprived birds, did not differ significantly between lines. Heat production was significantly enhanced (29%) in fed R+ cockerels compared with R
cockerels. Luiting (1991)
line) was not significant (P = 0.15), but in a larger population, Bordas and Mérat (1984)
line (+0.63°C).
found that as much as 50-70 % of the divergence in HP between lines could not be accounted for by changes in physical activity. In Experiment 1, the activity-related HP, which was higher in the R+ line (+16%), did not explain the total divergence in HP between lines. The difference due to activity [33 and 38 kJ/(kg0.75·d), in Experiments 1 and 2, respectively) represented only 25 and 36%, respectively, of the difference in HP between lines. Because no difference was observed in basal metabolic rate, the remaining 75 or 64% of the difference in HP could thus be accounted for by DIT.
), tube-feeding drastically reduced physical activity (Table 3) in both lines (
0.8 counts/min), suggesting a similar level of activity related to feed intake in the R+ and R
lines. Both lines spent the same time eating, which reinforces such a hypothesis. However, the energetic cost of activity (slope) appeared lower in the R+ line (Table 3). The difference in activity between lines may therefore be due to a difference in behavior such as higher water intake to enhance heat dissipation, as observed previously (Gabarrou and Géraert 1994
).
in humans as a facultative DIT. For 100 kJ TME ingested, R+ birds dissipated 27.5 kJ as DIT compared with 20.9 kJ in R
birds. Regressions between HP and feed intake (Table 3) indeed revealed higher coefficients in the R+ cockerels than in the R
cockerels, i.e., 0.261 versus 0.182 with free access to feed and 0.230 versus 0.176 when tube-fed. Moreover, DL-propranolol decreased HP only in the R+ line. Such results suggest that the R+ line dissipated more heat than required for obligatory thermogenesis induced by feed ingestion through a facultative or regulatory thermogenesis under sympathetic control (Jéquier 1985
). Such regulatory thermogenesis has also been observed previously in rats fed highly palatable diets (Rothwell and Stock 1979
). In this rat model, the increase in energy intake induced by highly palatable diets is partially eliminated by enhanced thermogenesis through
-adrenergic stimulation of the BAT (Rothwell and Stock 1980
).
birds, which generally exhibited similar plasma T3 and T4 concentrations and hepatic deiodinase activity. Danforth and Burger (1989)
were also unable to show any difference in plasma T3 and T4 when increased energy intake was balanced by enhanced HP, but an increase in plasma norepinephrine concentration was observed. However, the lower plasma T3 concentration observed in feed-deprived R+ birds might indicate higher T3 turnover in this line. T3 regulation of thermogenesis should be further investigated in these lines.
birds, suggesting similar metabolic pathways in both lines. However, fed R+ birds exhibited a lower triglyceridemia (as previously observed by El Kazzi et al. 1995), which could contribute to the lower adiposity of R+ birds (El Kazzi et al. 1995, Tixier et al. 1988
, Zein-El- Dein 1985). When feed deprived, R+ birds showed a higher NEFA concentration than R
birds. This has also been reported in rats fed highly palatable diets (Rothwell and Stock 1979
). In the hyperphagic rat model, enhanced thermogenesis results from a
-adrenergic and T3 stimulation of the BAT (Rothwell and Stock 1979
) and of the liver mitochondria (Liverini et al. 1994
). Fatty acids are indeed the main fuel of the enhanced thermogenesis of the BAT. But because birds have no BAT (Saarela 1989), other tissues could be involved. However, DIT and NST may have a common origin (Rothwell and Stock 1980
). Barré et al. (1985)
showed that NST of cold-acclimated ducklings was controlled by glucagon and involved the loose-coupled oxidative phosphorylation of subsarcolemmal muscle mitochondria. Liver, through its very important metabolic role in birds, might also be involved in the enhanced thermogenesis of R+ birds as suggested in rats fed highly palatable diets (Liverini et al. 1994
). The higher plasma NEFA level might also suggest that fatty acids can be used as fuel or even enhance the uncoupling of mitochondria (Barré et al. 1985
).
lines are an interesting model for the study of the genetic control of DIT. The enhanced HP due to a higher DIT allows R+ birds to eliminate their excessive energy intake. Metabolic pathways such as the uncoupling effect of NEFA and their tissue localization (liver or muscles) should be futher investigated in relation to the endocrine and/or neuroendocrine control. Although
-adrenergic regulation appears to be involved, thyroid control remains unclear. The investigation of thyroid hormone turnover could clarify its role in the enhanced thermogenesis of the R+ birds.
, cockerels selected for low RFC; RFC, residual food consumption; T3, triiodothyronine; T4, thyroxine; TME, true metabolizable energy; TMEi, true metabolizable energy intake.
Manuscript received 26 July 1996. Initial reviews completed 3 October 1996. Revision accepted 13 August 1997.
une installation automatisée appliquée aux oiseaux. Cahiers de Nutrition et de Diététique XXV: 205.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
W. G. Bottje and G. E. Carstens Association of mitochondrial function and feed efficiency in poultry and livestock species J Anim Sci, April 1, 2009; 87(14_suppl): E48 - E63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. F. Chen, N. Z. Huang, D. Gourichon, Y. P. Lee, M. Tixier-Boichard, and A. Bordas Effect of Introducing the Naked Neck Gene in a Line Selected for Low Residual Feed Consumption on Performance in Temperate or Subtropical Environments Poult. Sci., July 1, 2008; 87(7): 1320 - 1327. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Swennen, P.-J. Verhulst, A. Collin, A. Bordas, K. Verbeke, G. Vansant, E. Decuypere, and J. Buyse Further Investigations on the Role of Diet-Induced Thermogenesis in the Regulation of Feed Intake in Chickens: Comparison of Adult Cockerels of Lines Selected for High or Low Residual Feed Intake Poult. Sci., September 1, 2007; 86(9): 1960 - 1971. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Swennen, E. Delezie, A. Collin, E. Decuypere, and J. Buyse Further Investigations on the Role of Diet-Induced Thermogenesis in the Regulation of Feed Intake in Chickens: Comparison of Age-Matched Broiler versus Layer Cockerels Poult. Sci., May 1, 2007; 86(5): 895 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Blesbois, F. Seigneurin, I. Grasseau, C. Limouzin, J. Besnard, D. Gourichon, G. Coquerelle, P. Rault, and M. Tixier-Boichard Semen Cryopreservation for Ex Situ Management of Genetic Diversity in Chicken: Creation of the French Avian Cryobank Poult. Sci., March 1, 2007; 86(3): 555 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Van Eerden, H. Van Den Brand, M. J. W. Heetkamp, E. Decuypere, and B. Kemp Energy Partitioning and Thyroid Hormone Levels During Salmonella enteritidis Infections in Pullets with High or Low Residual Feed Intake. Poult. Sci., October 1, 2006; 85(10): 1775 - 1783. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Collin, M. Taouis, J. Buyse, N. B. Ifuta, V. M. Darras, P. Van As, R. D. Malheiros, V. M. B. Moraes, and E. Decuypere Thyroid status, but not insulin status, affects expression of avian uncoupling protein mRNA in chicken Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, April 1, 2003; 284(4): E771 - E777. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||