QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (Publish Ahead of Print[PDF]) All Versions of this Article: 139/12/2389    most recent jn.109.111856v1 Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Google Scholar Articles by Zempleni, J. Articles by Wijeratne, S. S. K. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Zempleni, J. Articles by Wijeratne, S. S. K.

---

Symposium: Nutrients and Epigenetic Regulation of Gene Expression

Repression of Transposable Elements by Histone Biotinylation^1,2

Department of Nutrition and Health Sciences, University of Nebraska at Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583

Transposable elements constitute >40% of the human genome; transposition of these elements increases genome instability and cancer risk. Epigenetic mechanisms are important for transcriptional repression of retrotransposons, thereby preventing transposition events. Binding of biotin to histones, mediated by holocarboxylase synthetase (HCS), is a novel histone mark that plays a role in gene regulation. Here, we review recent findings that biotinylation of lysine-12 in histone H4 (H4K12bio) is an epigenetic mechanism to repress long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons in human and mouse cell lines, primary cells from human adults, and in Drosophila melanogaster. Further, evidence is summarized that supports a causal relationship between the repression of LTR in H4K12bio-depleted cells and increased production of viral particles, increased frequency of retrotransposition events, and increased frequency of chromosomal abnormalities in mammals and Drosophila. Although HCS interacts physically with histones H3 and H4, the mechanism responsible for targeting HCS to retrotransposons to mediate histone biotinylation is uncertain. We hypothesize that HCS binds specifically to genomic regions rich in methylated cytosines and catalyzes increased biotinylation of histone H4 at lysine-12. Further, we hypothesize that this biotinylation promotes the subsequent dimethylation of lysine-9 in histone H3, resulting in an overall synergistic effect of 3 diet-dependent covalent modifications of histones in the repression of LTR.

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. jzempleni2{at}unl.edu.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. B. Kirkland Niacin Status Impacts Chromatin Structure J. Nutr., December 1, 2009; 139(12): 2397 - 2401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Ho and J. Zempleni Overview to Symposium "Nutrients and Epigenetic Regulation of Gene Expression" J. Nutr., December 1, 2009; 139(12): 2387 - 2388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Ho, J. D. Clarke, and R. H. Dashwood Dietary Sulforaphane, a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor for Cancer Prevention J. Nutr., December 1, 2009; 139(12): 2393 - 2396. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. Stover One-Carbon Metabolism-Genome Interactions in Folate-Associated Pathologies J. Nutr., December 1, 2009; 139(12): 2402 - 2405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]