Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 98 No. 3 July 1969, pp. 297-302
Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Renner, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Renner, R.

Effectiveness of Various Sources of Nonessential Nitrogen in Promoting Growth of Chicks Fed Carbohydrate-containing and "Carbohydrate-free" Diets1

Ruth Renner

School of Household Economics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Studies were conducted to compare the requirement of the chick for glutamic acid when fed "carbohydrate-free" and carbohydrate-containing diets, and to determine the effectiveness of other sources of nonessential nitrogen in meeting this requirement. Results showed that either L-glutamic acid or L-aspartic acid could serve as the major source of nonessential nitrogen when nonprotein energy was supplied by either glucose or soybean oil; however, in the absence of dietary carbohydrate the requirement increased. In the absence of dietary carbohydrate when nonprotein energy was supplied by soybean oil, diammonium citrate was less effective in promoting growth than L-glutamic acid or L-aspartic acid; DL-serine was still less effective, and DL-alanine and ammonium acetate almost completely failed to promote growth. The addition of carbohydrate to the diet markedly improved growth of chicks fed either diammonium citrate or ammonium acetate, but DL-alanine still failed to promote growth. Although DL-serine was more effective than DL-alanine, it was less effective than either L-glutamic acid, L-aspartic acid or diammonium citrate. Further studies showed that chicks fed a carbohydrate-containing diet in which L-alanine served as the major source of nonessential nitrogen grew at the same rate as chicks fed a similar diet containing L-aspartic acid, although slightly but significantly slower than chicks fed L-glutamic acid. The failure of chicks to grow when DL-alanine served as the major source of nonessential nitrogen in a carbohydrate-containing diet is due to the D-isomer.


1 Supported in part by a research grant from the National Research Council of Canada.

Manuscript received 27 December 1968.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]