Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 97 No. 4 April 1969, pp. 517-524
Copyright © 1969 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Burton, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Burton, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Reid, J. T.

Interrelationships among Energy Input, Body Size, Age and Body Composition of Sheep1

J. H. Burton2 and J. T. Reid

Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York

Interactions of age, body weight and energy intake on the proximate chemical composition and energy value of the body were examined in 26 Shropshire, male-castrate sheep. Body weight at a given age was manipulated by imposing on a given animal one of two levels of energy input (averaging 278 and 421 kcal of gross energy/1 kg empty-body weight 0.73 per day). The amounts of body components at a given age were greater in sheep receiving the high intake of energy than in those supplied the low level. The relationships between the body components and body weight, however, were not different for the two energy input levels. Thus, energy input, within the range studied, did not influence body composition in a manner independent of its effect on body mass. In animals containing less than 31% of fat, the amounts of body components increased linearly with increasing body weight; above this concentration of fat, the weights of water and protein increased at decreasing rates and the amounts of fat and energy increased at increasing rates, as body weight increased. The overall best fit of the relationships between the body components and body weight was provided by the model, Y = a Xb. For these relationships, the R2 values for the predictands other than ash ranged from 0.939 to 0.982. The use of age in addition to body weight as the predictors increased the R2 values by only 0.002 to 0.019 over those computed between body weight alone and the various predictands. Thus, body composition in sheep was not related to prior energy intake, only slightly associated with age, but was chiefly associated with body weight.


1 Supported by Public Health Service Research Grant no. AM-02889 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases.

2 The data reported here are a part of those presented in the M.S. degree Thesis by J. H. Burton to the Graduate School, Cornell University, 1967.

Manuscript received 21 October 1968.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]