Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 97 No. 1 January 1969, pp. 65-69
Copyright © 1969 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tennant, B.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tennant, B.
Right arrow Articles by Goldman, M.

Influence of Microorganisms on Intestinal Absorption: Oleic Acid 131I and Triolein 131I Absorption by Germfree and Conventionalized Rats1,2,

Bud Tennant, Mario Reina-Guerra, Doris Harrold and Marvin Goldman

Department of Clinical Sciences and the Radiobiology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California

Several differences in lipid metabolism have been demonstrated between germfree and conventional rats. To evaluate the role which intestinal absorption might play in determining these differences, we compared the absorption of oleic acid 131I and triolein 131I in germfree and conventionalized rats. Gastric emptying of both compounds appeared to be delayed in germfree rats and correspondingly less radioactivity reached the cecum during the 6-hour period following intragastric administration. When corrections were made for differences in gastric emptying, germfree and conventionalized rats absorbed oleic acid and triolein at similar rates. Under the conditions of our studies, intestinal microorganisms did not appear to influence the rate of either lipolysis or fatty acid absorption directly, but significantly influenced the rate at which fat was transported along the gastrointestinal tract.


1 This work was conducted as part of Western Regional Research Project, W-88 and was supported by RRF-2279.

2 A preliminary report of these results was presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Gnotobiotics, Incorporated, Buffalo, New York, June 9–10, 1968.

Manuscript received 5 August 1968.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]