Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 96 No. 1 September 1968, pp. 69-75
Copyright
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leveille, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chakrabarty, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leveille, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Chakrabarty, K.

Absorption and Utilization of Glucose by Meal-fed and Nibbling Rats1

Gilbert A. Leveille and Krishna Chakrabarty

Division of Nutritional Biochemistry, Department of Animal Science, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois

The absorption and utilization of glucose by meal-fed (animals having access to food for a single, daily, 2-hour period) and nibbling (fed ad libitum) rats was studied. Meal-fed rats absorbed glucose more rapidly than nibbling animals and this enhanced absorptive rate could be explained by an increase in the weight of the small intestine. The weight of the intestine relative to body weight and the glucose absorption coefficient were both increased by about 40% in the meal-fed as compared with the nibbling animal. As a consequence of the enhanced glucose absorption rate the amount of glucose entering the blood stream, per unit time, would be approximately 40% greater in the meal-fed animal. Yet, blood glucose levels increased more slowly in meal-fed than in nibbling rats following the oral administration of glucose. The rate of utilization of absorbed glucose was significantly greater in meal-fed as compared with nibbling rats. Also, the rate of glycogen storage in muscle (abdominal, gastrocnemius and diaphragm) following food ingestion was significantly greater for meal-fed than for nibbling animals. The physiological significance of these findings and the possible regulatory mechanisms involved are discussed.


1 Supported in part by Public Health Service Research Grant no. AM-10774 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases.

Manuscript received 7 March 1968.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]