Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 95 No. 4 August 1968, pp. 578-582
Copyright © 1968 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Menge, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Menge, H.

Linoleic Acid Requirement of the Hen for Reproduction

H. Menge

Animal Husbandry Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, Maryland

A study was designed to determine the linoleic acid (18:2) requirement of the hen for reproduction. Two hundred Leghorn pullets were reared and fed an essential fatty acid-deficient diet from 2 weeks of age through 22 weeks of age. At week 22, the depleted pullets were divided into 14 groups comprising duplicate pens of 7 different treatments, randomly arranged in a cage layer house. The groups were fed an 18:2 deficient diet supplemented with corn oil calculated on the basis of daily consumption to supply 0.0, 0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 4% 18:2, respectively. All diets were isocaloric and isonitrogenous. After a 20-week experimental period, the data showed that the hen required approximately 2% dietary 18:2 for egg production and maximum egg size, and 1% 18:2 for hatchability of fertile eggs. The requirement for production of fertile eggs was less than 0.125%. Using the ratio of oleate to linoleate (18:1 to 18:2) in the plasma and liver as an estimation of dietary adequacy, the data illustrate that a ratio of 5.0 or less is indicative of an adequate intake of 18:2 for the hen. When 18:2 was expressed as percentage of dietary calories, the data showed the requirement for hatchability to be 3.14% and for egg production and maximum egg size, 6.19% of dietary calories. There were no significant differences in nutrient intake and body weights between each experimental group. Thus, the reproductive responses obtained were due to supplementary 18:2, and the requirement can be expressed as percentage of diet or as percentage of dietary calories.


Manuscript received 19 February 1968.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]