Journal of Nutrition

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 95 No. 1 May 1968, pp. 111-121
Copyright © 1968 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howard, E.
Right arrow Articles by Granoff, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howard, E.
Right arrow Articles by Granoff, D. M.

Effect of Neonatal Food Restriction in Mice on Brain Growth, DNA and Cholesterol, and on Adult Delayed Response Learning1

Evelyn Howard and Dan M. Granoff

Department of Physiology, The Johns Hopkins University, School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland

This study was designed to examine the long-term effects of a limited period of nutritional restriction on ultimate brain size and functional capacity. Experimental mice were intermittently removed from their mothers during the period of rapid brain growth between 2 and 16 days of age, producing a 57% reduction in body weight compared with littermate controls. Thereafter they were fed ad libitum. At 9 months, body, cerebral and cerebellar weights were reduced in the males by 17, 7 and 14%, respectively, below control values. Total DNA was reduced 8% in the cerebrum and 22% in the cerebellum. Cerebral cholesterol was reduced slightly. Despite these brain changes, the restricted groups showed no lasting impairment in voluntary running, in learning a Lashley type III maze, or a visual discrimination with escape from water as a reward. The restricted males showed an unexpected improvement in learning a delayed response task. The restriction experience may have altered reaction patterns so that the restricted males were able to more than compensate for any possible handicap due to the nutritional deprivation. The restricted females did not manifest this improved performance, and their final body size reduction exceeded that of the males.


1 This investigation was supported in part by Public Health Service Research Grant no. AM-02679 from the National Institute of Arthritis and Metabolic Diseases, and by a grant from the Henry Foundation.

Manuscript received 17 November 1967.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]