Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 94 No. 2 February 1968, pp. 185-192
Copyright © 1968 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Slyter, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Slyter, L. L.
Right arrow Articles by Weaver, J. M.

Microbial Species Including Ureolytic Bacteria from the Rumen of Cattle Fed Purified Diets

L. L. Slyter, R. R. Oltjen, D. L. Kern and J. M. Weaver

United States Department of Agriculture, ARS, Animal Husbandry Research Division, Beltsville, Maryland

The rumen microbial populations were studied in cattle fed either natural or purified diets. The purified diets contained either isolated soy protein or 1 of 4 nonprotein nitrogen (NPN) sources. Four-hundred and three strains of bacteria isolated at random from a nonselective medium (264 strains) and a lactobacillus medium (139 strains) were presumptively identified and tested for urease activity. There were 28 and 2 ureolytic strains among the total bacteria isolated from the nonselective and lactobacillus medium, respectively. The ureolytic strains represented a wide variety of bacteria. Among the total population, the most predominant presumptively identified groups of bacteria grown on nonselective medium were anaerobic lactobacilli and Bacteroides amylophilus. The latter group's concentrations in rumen contents were higher in the steers fed either urea or urea phosphate than in steers fed biuret or uric acid. The percentage of facultative anaerobic and H2S-producing ruminal bacteria were significantly greater for steers fed biruet than for steers fed the other NPN sources. Steers fed uric acid had significantly more cellulolytic bacteria than steers fed urea and urea phosphate and steers fed urea had significantly more amylolytic bacteria than steers fed urea phosphate. Cattle fed a 30% roughage-70% concentrate natural diet contained significantly more ruminal protozoa and gramnegative rod-shaped bacteria but contained significantly fewer cocci than cattle fed urea or isolated soy supplemented purified diets.


Manuscript received 24 June 1967.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]