Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 92 No. 1 May 1967, pp. 66-70
Copyright © 1967 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berg, B. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berg, B. N.

Maintenance of Pregnancy in Protein-deprived Rats by Transitory Protein Supplements during Early Gestation

Benjamin N. Berg

Geigy Research, Division of Geigy Chemical Corporation, Ardsley, New York

A study was made to determine the relationship between dietary protein and maintenance of pregnancy in protein-deprived rats at 2 stages of gestation, namely, after mating (day zero) and after implantation of the blastocyst (day 5). By means of transitory feeding, it was shown that there was a critical need for protein at both stages, and that protein supplements supported pregnancy at either stage. Particularly striking was the observation that supplements of protein given 2 or 3 days after inception of pregnancy were sufficient to sustain reproduction in rats deprived of dietary protein at the same high level as in protein-fed controls. Litter size was unaffected by protein deficiency, but fetal growth was retarded. Food consumption of rats receiving a protein-free diet throughout gestation was less than that of rats receiving 20% protein, and the reduction in food intake was greater in protein-deprived rats carrying young than in those failing to litter. The results of the present experiments correspond to those reported previously with a restricted stock diet, and suggest that the effects of restriction were attributable to protein deficiency.


Manuscript received 10 December 1966.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]