Journal of Nutrition OpenSOurce Diets- www.ResearchDiets.com

Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Journal of Nutrition Vol. 9 No. 2 February 1935, pp. 233-260
Copyright © 1935 by American Society for Nutrition
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Murlin, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Burton, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Murlin, J. R.
Right arrow Articles by Burton, A. C.

Human Calorimetry

I. A Semi-Automatic Respiration Calorimeter

Nine Figures

John R. Murlin and Alan C. Burton

Department of Vital Economics, University of Rochester, Rochester, N. Y.

A respiration calorimeter is described in which the measurement of direct heat has many automatic features. The respiration chamber is a cylinder of Pyrex glass through which air circulates in a closed circuit including two interchangeable Benedict trains of absorbers. Oxygen is admitted automatically as it is consumed and is measured on a wet test meter. Cold water, brought initially to a constant temperature, passes through a grid of pyrex tubes to carry away most of the heat. The temperatures of inflowing and outflowing water and air, and the temperature of the glass wall are electrically measured and automatically recorded every minute. Water flow and air flow are recorded by meters of special design.

The calorimeter is not adiabatic, the escape of heat through the insulation around the walls being measured by the thermal gradient set up across it, which is electrically recorded by resistance thermometers. Calibration with electrical input of heat gives the heat flow for a given gradient and also the hydrothermal equivalent (22.1 Calories per degree).

In a series of alcohol checks, the totals of direct and indirect heats differ by 0.17 per cent, while the average difference in individual hour periods is 2.9 per cent. In human calorimetry, the average difference is more, but by the use of rectal and surface temperatures measured by resistance thermometers, it has been brought to 5.5 per cent.


Manuscript received 2 August 1934.





Home Help [Feedback] [For Subscribers] [Archive] [Search] [Contents]